Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system

Abstract

The present invention provides a method and system for providing on-site electrical power to a fracturing operation, and an electrically powered fracturing system. Natural gas can be used to drive a turbine generator in the production of electrical power. A scalable, electrically powered fracturing fleet is provided to pump fluids for the fracturing operation, obviating the need for a constant supply of diesel fuel to the site and reducing the site footprint and infrastructure required for the fracturing operation, when compared with conventional systems.

Claims

1. A system for use in delivering pressurized fluid to a wellbore, the system comprising: a) an electrically powered fracturing system with at least one fracturing pump capable of pumping a fracturing fluid, wherein the pump is driven by at least one electric pump motor electrically connected to a portable turbine powered electrical generator, wherein the electrically powered fracturing system further comprises: b) trailer on which the at least one fracturing pump and the at least one electric pump motor are mounted; and c) an electric blender system configured to provide a blended fracturing fluid to the fracturing pump for delivery to a wellbore operation, comprising: a blender tub; a fluid additive system: a fluid addition source hopper; an inlet electric motor configured to drive an inlet pump, in communication with a fluid additive source and cable of pumping the fluid additive source into and out of the blender tub; d) at least one variable control drive electrically connected to at least one electric motor to control the speed of at least one electric motor; and e) at least one control system.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises liquid petroleum gas.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the trailer on which the electrically powered fracturing system is mounted further comprises at least one variable control drive mounted.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one variable control drive controls the speed of the at least one electric pump motor of the electrically powered fracturing system and the at least one variable control drive is mounted on a separate trailer from the electrically powered fracturing system.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein at least one variable control drive controls the speed of at least one blending motor.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one electric motor is capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 revolutions per minute (rpm) and up to 20,000 foot per pounds (ft/lbs) of torque.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein speed of the electric pump motor is controlled by one or more variable frequency drive.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the trailer on which the electrically powered fracturing system is mounted further comprises at least one variable control drive mounted on the same trailer.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the electrical generator is adapted to generate electricity at a rating of 13.8 kilovolts for fracturing operations.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the system produces no greater than about 80 decibels of sound.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the system produces carbon dioxide emissions no greater than 2200 kilogram per hour (kg/hr).

12. The system of claim 1, wherein the system is powered by natural gas.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the system is powered by liquid condensate fuel.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the control system is further configured to monitor and control the turbine powered electrical generator.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more variable frequency drives control the speed of the at least one electric pump motor and the blending motor.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more variable frequency drives control the current of the at least one electric pump motor and the blending motor.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the control system is configured to control and monitor at least one pump, motors, and the turbine powered electrical generator utilizing a single point of control.

18. The system of claim 1, wherein further comprising an electrical transformer and a drive unit that are in electrical communication with the turbine generator.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the electrical transformer is located on the same trailer as the at least one electric pump motor.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the drive unit is configured to step down voltage from the portable turbine powered electrical generator.

21. A method of delivering fracturing fluid to a wellbore, the method wherein comprising the steps of: providing a portable turbine powered electrical generator with a control system electrically connected to the generator; providing an electrically powered fracturing system with at least one fracturing pump capable of pumping a fracturing fluid comprising, driven by at least one electric pump motor electrically connected to a portable turbine powered electrical generator, and wherein the electrically powered fracturing further comprises a trailer on which the at least one pump and the at least one electric pump motor are mounted; providing an electric blender system configured to provide a blended fracturing fluid to the fracturing pump for delivery to a wellbore operation, comprising: a blender tub; a fluid additive system: a fluid addition source hopper; an inlet electric motor configured to drive an inlet pump, in communication with a fluid additive source and cable of pumping the fluid additive source into and out of the blender tub; providing at least one variable control drive electrically connected to the electric pump motor; and pumping a fracturing fluid from the blending system into the electrically powered fracturing system; and pumping the fracturing fluid using the at least one fracturing pump into a wellbore.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises liquid petroleum gas.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein further comprising the step of controlling the speed of the electric pump motor through at least one variable control drive.

24. The method of claim 21, wherein further comprising controlling the current delivered to the electric pump motor through at least one variable control drive.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein further comprising controlling and monitoring motor and the turbine powered electrical generator utilizing a single point of control.

26. The method of claim 21, wherein the electrical generator is adapted to generate electricity at a rating of 13.8 kilovolts for fracturing operations.

27. The method of claim 21, wherein the system produces no greater than about 80 decibels of sound.

28. The method of claim 21, wherein at least one electric motor is capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 revolutions per minute (rpm) and up to 20,000 foot per pounds (ft/lbs) of torque.

29. The method of claim 21, wherein further comprising the step of providing a transformer and a drive unit electrically connected to the portable turbine powered electrical generator and stepping down the voltage of the portable turbine powered electrical generator.

30. The method of claim 21, wherein further comprising providing a control system.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) A better understanding of the presently disclosed subject matter can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein:

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a traditional fracturing site;

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of a fracturing site in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;

(4) FIG. 3 is a schematic perspective view of a fracturing trailer in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;

(5) FIG. 4A is a schematic perspective view of a fracturing module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;

(6) FIG. 4B is a schematic perspective view of a fracturing module with maintenance personnel in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;

(7) FIG. 5A is a schematic side view of a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;

(8) FIG. 5B is an end view of the blender module shown in FIG. 4A;

(9) FIG. 5C is a schematic top view of a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;

(10) FIG. 5D is a schematic side view of the blender module shown in FIG. 5C;

(11) FIG. 5E is a schematic perspective view of the blender module shown in FIG. 5C;

(12) FIG. 6 is a schematic top view of an inlet manifold for a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein; and

(13) FIG. 7 is a schematic top view of an outlet manifold for a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(14) The presently disclosed subject matter generally relates to an electrically powered fracturing system and a system and method for providing on-site electrical power and delivering fracturing fluid to a wellbore at a fracturing operation.

(15) In a conventional fracturing operation, a slurry of fluids and additives is injected into a hydrocarbon bearing rock formation at a wellbore to propagate fracturing. Low pressure fluids are mixed with chemicals, sand, and, if necessary, acid, and then transferred at medium pressure and high rate to vertical and/or deviated portions of the wellbore via multiple high pressure, plunger style pumps driven by diesel fueled prime movers. The majority of the fluids injected will be flowed back through the wellbore and recovered, while the sand will remain in the newly created fracture, thus propping it open and providing a permeable membrane for hydrocarbon fluids and gases to flow through so they may be recovered.

(16) According to the illustrative embodiments described herein, natural gas (either supplied to the site or produced on-site) can be used to drive a dedicated source of electrical power, such as a turbine generator, for hydrocarbon-producing wellbore completions. A scalable, electrically powered fracturing fleet is provided to deliver pressurized treatment fluid, such as fracturing fluid, to a wellbore in a fracturing operation, obviating the need for a constant supply of diesel fuel to the site and reducing the site footprint and infrastructure required for the fracturing operation, when compared with conventional operations. The treatment fluid provided for pressurized delivery to the wellbore can be continuous with the wellbore and with one or more components of the fracturing fleet, in certain illustrative embodiments. In these embodiments, continuous generally means that downhole hydrodynamics are dependent upon constant flow (rate and pressure) of the delivered fluids, and that there should not be any interruption in fluid flow during delivery to the wellbore if the fracture is to propagate as desired. However, it should not be interpreted to mean that operations of the fracturing fleet cannot generally be stopped and started, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.

(17) With reference to FIG. 1, a site plan for a traditional fracturing operation on an onshore site is shown. Multiple trailers 5 are provided, each having at least one diesel tank mounted or otherwise disposed thereon. Each trailer 5 is attached to a truck 6 to permit refueling of the diesel tanks as required. Trucks 6 and trailers 5 are located within region A on the fracturing site. Each truck 6 requires a dedicated operator. One or more prime movers are fueled by the diesel and are used to power the fracturing operation. One or more separate chemical handling skids 7 are provided for housing of blending tanks and related equipment.

(18) With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative embodiment of a site plan for an electrically powered fracturing operation on a onshore site is shown. The fracturing operation includes one or more trailers 10, each housing one or more fracturing modules 20 (see FIG. 3). Trailers 10 are located in region B on the fracturing site. One or more natural gas-powered turbine generators 30 are located in region C on the site, which is located a remote distance D from region B where the trailers 10 and fracturing modules 20 are located, for safety reasons. Turbine generators 30 replace the diesel prime movers utilized in the site plan of FIG. 1. Turbine generators 30 provide a dedicated source of electric power on-site. There is preferably a physical separation between the natural gas-based power generation in region C and the fracturing operation and wellbore located in region B. The natural gas-based power generation can require greater safety precautions than the fracturing operation and wellhead. Accordingly, security measures can be taken in region C to limit access to this more hazardous location, while maintaining separate safety standards in region B where the majority of site personnel are typically located. Further, the natural gas powered supply of electricity can be monitored and regulated remotely such that, if desired, no personnel are required to be within region C during operation.

(19) Notably, the setup of FIG. 2 requires significantly less infrastructure than the setup shown in FIG. 1, while providing comparable pumping capacity. Fewer trailers 10 are present in region B of FIG. 2 than the trucks 6 and trailers 5 in region A of FIG. 1, due to the lack of need for a constant diesel fuel supply. Further, each trailer 10 in FIG. 2 does not need a dedicated truck 6 and operator as in FIG. 1. Fewer chemical handling skids 7 are required in region B of FIG. 2 than in region A of FIG. 1, as the skids 7 in FIG. 2 can be electrically powered. Also, by removing diesel prime movers, all associated machinery necessary for power transfer can be eliminated, such as the transmission, torque converter, clutch, drive shaft, hydraulic system, etc. . . . , and the need for cooling systems, including circulating pumps and fluids, is significantly reduced. In an illustrative embodiment, the physical footprint of the on-site area in region B of FIG. 2 is about 80% less than the footprint for the conventional system in region A of FIG. 1.

(20) With reference to the illustrative embodiments of FIG. 3, trailer 10 for housing one or more fracturing modules 20 is shown. Trailer 10 can also be a skid, in certain illustrative embodiments. Each fracturing module 20 can include an electric motor 21 and a fluid pump 22 coupled thereto. During fracturing, fracturing module 20 is operatively associated with turbine generator 30 to receive electric power therefrom. In certain illustrative embodiments, a plurality of electric motors 21 and pumps 22 can be transported on a single trailer 10. In the illustrative embodiments of FIG. 3, four electric motors 21 and pumps 22 are transported on a single trailer 10. Each electric motor 21 is paired to a pump 22 as a single fracturing module 20. Each fracturing module 20 can be removably mounted to trailer 10 to facilitate ease of replacement as necessary. Fracturing modules 20 utilize electric power from turbine generator 30 to pump the fracturing fluid directly to the wellbore.

(21) Electrical Power Generation

(22) The use of a turbine to directly drive a pump has been previously explored. In such systems, a transmission is used to regulate turbine power to the pump to allow for speed and torque control. In the present operation, natural gas is instead used to drive a dedicated power source in the production of electricity. In illustrative embodiments, the dedicated power source is an on-site turbine generator. The need for a transmission is eliminated, and generated electricity can be used to power the fracturing modules, blenders, and other on-site operations as necessary.

(23) Grid power may be accessible on-site in certain fracturing operations, but the use of a dedicated power source is preferred. During startup of a fracturing operation, massive amounts of power are required such that the use of grid power would be impractical. Natural gas powered generators are more suitable for this application based on the likely availability of natural gas on-site and the capacity of natural gas generators for producing large amounts of power. Notably, the potential for very large instantaneous adjustments in power drawn from the grid during a fracturing operation could jeopardize the stability and reliability of the grid power system. Accordingly, a site-generated and dedicated source of electricity provides a more feasible solution in powering an electric fracturing system. In addition, a dedicated on-site operation can be used to provide power to operate other local equipment, including coiled tubing systems, service rigs, etc. . . .

(24) In an illustrative embodiment, a single natural gas powered turbine generator 30, as housed in a restricted area C of FIG. 2, can generate sufficient power (for example 31 MW at 13,800 volts AC power) to supply several electric motors 21 and pumps 22, avoiding the current need to deliver and operate each fluid pump from a separate diesel-powered truck. A turbine suitable for this purpose is a TM2500+ turbine generator sold by General Electric. Other generation packages could be supplied by Pratt & Whitney or Kawasaki for example. Multiple options are available for turbine power generation, depending on the amount of electricity required. In an illustrative embodiment, liquid fuels such as condensate can also be provided to drive turbine generator 30 instead of, or in addition to, natural gas. Condensate is less expensive than diesel fuels, thus reducing operational costs.

(25) Fracturing Module

(26) With reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, an illustrative embodiment of fracturing module 20 is provided. Fracturing module 20 can include an electric motor 21 coupled to one or more electric pumps 22, in certain illustrative embodiments. A suitable pump is a quintiplex or triplex plunger style pump, for example, the SWGS-2500 Well Service Pump sold by Gardner Denver, Inc.

(27) Electric motor 21 is operatively associated with turbine generator 30, in certain embodiments. Typically, each fracturing module 20 will be associated with a drive housing for controlling electric motor 21 and pumps 22, as well as an electrical transformer and drive unit 50 (see FIG. 3) to step down the voltage of the power from turbine generator 30 to a voltage appropriate for electric motor 21. The electrical transformer and drive unit 50 can be provided as an independent unit for association with fracturing module 20, or can be permanently fixed to the trailer 10, in various embodiments. If permanently fixed, then transformer and drive unit 50 can be scalable to allow addition or subtraction of pumps 22 or other components to accommodate any operational requirements.

(28) Each pump 22 and electric motor 21 are modular in nature so as to simplify removal and replacement from fracturing module 20 for maintenance purposes. Removal of a single fracturing module 20 from trailer 10 is also simplified. For example, any fracturing module 20 can be unplugged and unpinned from trailer 10 and removed, and another fracturing module 20 can be installed in its place in a matter of minutes.

(29) In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 3, trailer 10 can house four fracturing modules 20, along with a transformer and drive unit 50. In this particular configuration, each single trailer 10 provides more pumping capacity than four of the traditional diesel powered fracturing trailers 5 of FIG. 1, as parasitic losses are minimal in the electric fracturing system compared to the parasitic losses typical of diesel fueled systems. For example, a conventional diesel powered fluid pump is rated for 2250 hp. However, due to parasitic losses in the transmission, torque converter and cooling systems, diesel fueled systems typically only provide 1800 hp to the pumps. In contrast, the present system can deliver a true 2500 hp directly to each pump 22 because pump 22 is directly coupled to electric motor 21. Further, the nominal weight of a conventional fluid pump is up to 120,000 lbs. In the present operation, each fracturing module 20 weighs approximately 28,000 lbs., thus allowing for placement of four pumps 22 in the same physical dimension (size and weight) as the spacing needed for a single pump in conventional diesel systems, as well as allowing for up to 10,000 hp total to the pumps. In other embodiments, more or fewer fracturing modules 20 may be located on trailer 10 as desired or required for operational purposes.

(30) In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can include a electric motor 21 that is an AC permanent magnet motor capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque. Fracturing module 20 can also include a pump 22 that is a plunger-style fluid pump coupled to electric motor 21. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have dimensions of approximately 136 width108 length100 height. These dimensions would allow fracturing module 20 to be easily portable and fit with a ISO intermodal container for shipping purposes without the need for disassembly. Standard sized ISO container lengths are typically 20, 40 or 53. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have dimensions of no greater than 136 width108 length100 height. These dimensions for fracturing module 20 would also allow crew members to easily fit within the confines of fracturing module 20 to make repairs, as illustrated in FIG. 4b. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have a width of no greater than 102 to fall within shipping configurations and road restrictions. In a specific embodiment, fracturing module 20 is capable of operating at 2500 hp while still having the above specified dimensions and meeting the above mentioned specifications for rpms and ft/lbs of torque.

(31) Electric Motor

(32) With reference to the illustrative embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3, a medium low voltage AC permanent magnet electric motor 21 receives electric power from turbine generator 30, and is coupled directly to pump 22. In order to ensure suitability for use in fracturing, electric motor 21 should be capable of operation up to 1,500 rpm with a torque of up to 20,000 ft/lbs, in certain illustrative embodiments. A motor suitable for this purpose is sold under the trademark TeraTorq and is available from Comprehensive Power, Inc. of Marlborough, Massachusetts A compact motor of sufficient torque will allow the number of fracturing modules 20 placed on each trailer 10 to be maximized.

(33) Blender

(34) For greater efficiency, conventional diesel powered blenders and chemical addition units can be replaced with electrically powered blender units. In certain illustrative embodiments as described herein, the electrically powered blender units can be modular in nature for housing on trailer 10 in place of fracturing module 20, or housed independently for association with each trailer 10. An electric blending operation permits greater accuracy and control of fracturing fluid additives. Further, the centrifugal blender tubs typically used with blending trailers to blend fluids with proppant, sand, chemicals, acid, etc. . . . prior to delivery to the wellbore are a common source of maintenance costs in traditional fracturing operations.

(35) With reference to FIGS. 5A-5E and FIGS. 6-7, illustrative embodiments of a blender module 40 and components thereof are provided. Blender module 40 can be operatively associated with turbine generator 30 and capable of providing fractioning fluid to pump 22 for delivery to the wellbore. In certain embodiments, blender module 40 can include at least one fluid additive source 44, at least one fluid source 48, and at least one centrifugal blender tub 46. Electric power can be supplied from turbine generator 30 to blender module 40 to effect blending of a fluid from fluid source 48 with a fluid additive from fluid additive source 44 to generate the fracturing fluid. In certain embodiments, the fluid from fluid source 48 can be, for example, water, oils or methanol blends, and the fluid additive from fluid additive source 44 can be, for example, friction reducers, gellents, gellent breakers or biocides.

(36) In certain illustrative embodiments, blender module 40 can have a dual configuration, with a first blender unit 47a and a second blender unit 47b positioned adjacent to each other. This dual configuration is designed to provide redundancy and to facilitate access for maintenance and replacement of components as needed. In certain embodiments, each blender unit 47a and 47b can have its own electrically-powered suction and tub motors disposed thereon, and optionally, other electrically-powered motors can be utilized for chemical additional and/or other ancillary operational functions, as discussed further herein.

(37) For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, first blender unit 47a can have a plurality of electric motors including a first electric motor 43a and a second electric motor 41a that are used to drive various components of blender module 40. Electric motors 41a and 43a can be powered by turbine generator 30. Fluid can be pumped into blender module 40 through an inlet manifold 48a by first electric motor 43a and added to tub 46a. Thus, first electric motor 43a acts as a suction motor. Second electric motor 41a can drive the centrifugal blending process in tub 46a. Second electric motor 41a can also drive the delivery of blended fluid out of blender module 40 and to the wellbore via an outlet manifold 49a. Thus, second electric motor 41a acts as a tub motor and a discharge motor. In certain illustrative embodiments, a third electric motor 42a can also be provided. Third electric motor 42a can also be powered by turbine generator 30, and can power delivery of fluid additives to blender 46a. For example, proppant from a hopper 44a can be delivered to a blender tub 46a, for example, a centrifugal blender tub, by an auger 45a, which is powered by third electric motor 42a.

(38) Similarly, in certain illustrative embodiments, second blender unit 47b can have a plurality of electric motors including a first electric motor 43b and a second electric motor 41b that are used to drive various components of blender module 40. Electric motors 41b and 43b can be powered by turbine generator 30. Fluid can be pumped into blender module 40 through an inlet manifold 48b by first electric motor 43b and added to tub 46b. Thus, second electric motor 43a acts as a suction motor. Second electric motor 41b can drive the centrifugal blending process in tub 46b. Second electric motor 41b can also drive the delivery of blended fluid out of blender module 40 and to the wellbore via an outlet manifold 49b. Thus, second electric motor 41b acts as a tub motor and a discharge motor. In certain illustrative embodiments, a third electric motor 42b can also be provided. Third electric motor 42b can also be powered by turbine generator 30, and can power delivery of fluid additives to blender 46b. For example, proppant from a hopper 44b can be delivered to a blender tub 46b, for example, a centrifugal blender tub, by an auger 45b, which is powered by third electric motor 42b.

(39) Blender module 40 can also include a control cabin 53 for housing equipment controls for first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b, and can further include appropriate drives and coolers as required.

(40) Conventional blenders powered by a diesel hydraulic system are typically housed on a forty-five foot tractor trailer and are capable of approximately 100 bbl/min. In contrast, the dual configuration of blender module 40 having first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b can provide a total output capability of 240 bbl/min in the same physical footprint as a conventional blender, without the need for a separate backup unit in case of failure.

(41) Redundant system blenders have been tried in the past with limited success, mostly due to problems with balancing weights of the trailers while still delivering the appropriate amount of power. Typically, two separate engines, each approximately 650 hp, have been mounted side by side on the nose of the trailer. In order to run all of the necessary systems, each engine must drive a mixing tub via a transmission, drop box and extended drive shaft. A large hydraulic system is also fitted to each engine to run all auxiliary systems such as chemical additions and suction pumps. Parasitic power losses are very large and the hosing and wiring is complex.

(42) In contrast, the electric powered blender module 40 described in certain illustrative embodiments herein can relieve the parasitic power losses of conventional systems by direct driving each piece of critical equipment with a dedicated electric motor. Further, the electric powered blender module 40 described in certain illustrative embodiments herein allows for plumbing routes that are unavailable in conventional applications. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the fluid source can be an inlet manifold 48 that can have one or more inlet crossing lines 50 (see FIG. 7) that connect the section of inlet manifold 48 dedicated to delivering fluid to first blender unit 47a with the section of inlet manifold 48 dedicated to delivering fluid to second blender unit 47b. Similarly, in certain illustrative embodiments, outlet manifold 49 can have one or more outlet crossing lines 51 (see FIG. 6) that connect the section of outlet manifold 49 dedicated to delivering fluid from first blender unit 47a with the section of outlet manifold 49 dedicated to delivering fluid from second blender unit 47b. Crossing lines 50 and 51 allow flow to be routed or diverted between first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b. Thus, blender module 40 can mix from either side, or both sides, and/or discharge to either side, or both sides, if necessary. As a result, the attainable rates for the electric powered blender module 40 are much larger that of a conventional blender. In certain illustrative embodiments, each side (i.e., first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b) of blender module 40 is capable of approximately 120 bbl/min. Also, each side (i.e., first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b) can move approximately 15 t/min of sand, at least in part because the length of auger 45 is shorter (approximately 6) as compared to conventional units (approximately 12).

(43) In certain illustrative embodiments, blender module 40 can be scaled down or downsized to a single, compact module comparable in size and dimensions to fracturing module 20 described herein. For smaller fracturing or treatment jobs requiring fewer than four fracturing modules 20, a downsized blender module 40 can replace one of the fracturing modules 20 on trailer 10, thus reducing operational costs and improving transportability of the system.

(44) Control System

(45) A control system can be provided for regulating various equipment and systems within the electric powered fractioning operation. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the control system can regulate fracturing module 20 in delivery of treatment fluid from blender module 30 to pumps 22 for delivery to the wellbore. Controls for the electric-powered operation described herein are a significant improvement over that of conventional diesel powered systems. Because electric motors are controlled by variable frequency drives, absolute control of all equipment on location can be maintained from one central point. When the system operator sets a maximum pressure for the treatment, the control software and variable frequency drives calculate a maximum current available to the motors. Variable frequency drives essentially tell the motors what they are allowed to do.

(46) Electric motors controlled via variable frequency drive are far safer and easier to control than conventional diesel powered equipment. For example, conventional fleets with diesel powered pumps utilize an electronically controlled transmission and engine on the unit. There can be up to fourteen different parameters that need to be monitored and controlled for proper operation. These signals are typically sent via hardwired cable to an operator console controlled by the pump driver. The signals are converted from digital to analog so the inputs can be made via switches and control knobs. The inputs are then converted from analog back to digital and sent back to the unit. The control module on the unit then tells the engine or transmission to perform the required task and the signal is converted to a mechanical operation. This process takes time.

(47) Accidental over-pressures are quite common in these conventional operations, as the signal must travel to the console, back to the unit and then perform a mechanical function. Over-pressures can occur in milliseconds due to the nature of the operations. These are usually due to human error, and can be as simple as a single operator failing to react to a command. They are often due to a valve being closed, which accidentally creates a deadhead situation.

(48) For example, in January of 2011, a large scale fractioning operation was taking place in the Horn River Basin of north-eastern British Columbia, Canada. A leak occurred in one of the lines and a shutdown order was given. The master valve on the wellhead was then closed remotely. Unfortunately, multiple pumps were still rolling and a system over-pressure ensued. Treating iron rated for 10,000 psi was taken to well over 15,000 psi. A line attached to the well also separated, causing it to whip around. The incident caused a shutdown interruption to the entire operation for over a week while investigation and damage assessment were performed.

(49) The control system provided according to the present illustrative embodiments, being electrically powered, virtually eliminates these types of scenarios from occurring. A maximum pressure value set at the beginning of the operation is the maximum amount of power that can be sent to electric motor 21 for pump 22. By extrapolating a maximum current value from this input, electric motor 21 does not have the available power to exceed its operating pressure. Also, because there are virtually no mechanical systems between pump 22 and electric motor 21, there is far less moment of inertia of gears and clutches to deal with. A near instantaneous stop of electric motor 21 results in a near instantaneous stop of pump 22.

(50) An electrically powered and controlled system as described herein greatly increases the ease in which all equipment can be synced or slaved to each other. This means a change at one single point will be carried out by all pieces of equipment, unlike with diesel equipment. For example, in conventional diesel powered operations, the blender typically supplies all the necessary fluids to the entire system. In order to perform a rate change to the operation, the blender must change rate prior to the pumps changing rates. This can often result in accidental overflow of the blender tubs and/or cavitation of the pumps due to the time lag of each piece of equipment being given manual commands.

(51) In contrast, the present operation utilizes a single point control that is not linked solely to blender operations, in certain illustrative embodiments. All operation parameters can be input prior to beginning the fractioning. If a rate change is required, the system will increase the rate of the entire system with a single command. This means that if pumps 22 are told to increase rate, then blender module 40 along with the chemical units and even ancillary equipment like sand belts will increase rates to compensate automatically.

(52) Suitable controls and computer monitoring for the entire fracturing operation can take place at a single central location, which facilitates adherence to pre-set safety parameters. For example, a control center 40 is indicated in FIG. 2 from which operations can be managed via communications link 41. Examples of operations that can be controlled and monitored remotely from control center 40 via communications link 41 can be the power generation function in Area B, or the delivery of treatment fluid from blender module 40 to pumps 22 for delivery to the wellbore.

Comparison Example

(53) Table 1, shown below, compares and contrasts the operational costs and manpower requirements for a conventional diesel powered operation (such as shown in FIG. 1) with those of a electric powered operation (such as shown in FIG. 2).

(54) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of Conventional Diesel Powered Operation vs. Electric Powered Operation Diesel Powered Electric Powered Operation Operation Total fuel cost (diesel) - Total fuel cost (natural gas) - about $80,000 per day about $2,300 per day Service interval for Service interval for diesel engines - about electric motor - about every 200-300 hours every 50,000 hours Dedicated crew size - Dedicated crew size - about 40 people about 10 people

(55) In Table 1, the Diesel Powered Operation utilizes at least 24 pumps and 2 blenders, and requires at least 54,000 hp to execute the fracturing program on that location. Each pump burns approximately 300-400 liters per hour of operation, and the blender units burn a comparable amount of diesel fuel. Because of the fuel consumption and fuel capacity of this conventional unit, it requires refueling during operation, which is extremely dangerous and presents a fire hazard. Further, each piece of conventional equipment needs a dedicated tractor to move it and a driver/operator to run it. The crew size required to operate and maintain a conventional operation such as the one in FIG. 1 represents a direct cost for the site operator.

(56) In contrast, the electric powered operation as described herein utilizes a turbine that only consumes about 6 mm scf of natural gas per 24 hours. At current market rates (approximately $2.50 per mmbtu), this equates to a reduction in direct cost to the site operator of over $77,000 per day compared to the diesel powered operation. Also, the service interval on electric motors is about 50,000 hours, which allows the majority of reliability and maintainability costs to disappear. Further, the need for multiple drivers/operators is reduced significantly, and electric powered operation means that a single operator can run the entire system from a central location. Crew size can be reduced by around 75%, as only about 10 people are needed on the same location to accomplish the same tasks as conventional operations, with the 10 people including off-site personnel maintenance personnel. Further, crew size does not change with the amount of equipment used. Thus, the electric powered operation is significantly more economical.

Modular Design and Alternate Embodiments

(57) As discussed above, the modular nature of the electric powered fracturing operation described herein provides significant operational advantages and efficiencies over traditional fracturing systems. Each fracturing module 20 sits on trailer 10 which houses the necessary mounts and manifold systems for low pressure suctions and high pressure discharges. Each fracturing module 20 can be removed from service and replaced without shutting down or compromising the fractioning spread. For instance, pump 22 can be isolated from trailer 10, removed and replaced by a new pump 22 in just a few minutes. If fracturing module 20 requires service, it can be isolated from the fluid lines, unplugged, un-pinned and removed by a forklift. Another fracturing module 20 can be then re-inserted in the same fashion, realizing a drastic time savings. In addition, the removed fracturing module 20 can be repaired or serviced in the field. In contrast, if one of the pumps in a conventional diesel powered system goes down or requires service, the tractor/trailer combination needs to be disconnected from the manifold system and driven out of the location. A replacement unit must then be backed into the line and reconnected. Maneuvering these units in these tight confines is difficult and dangerous.

(58) The presently described electric powered fracturing operation can be easily adapted to accommodate additional types of pumping capabilities as needed. For example, a replacement pumping module can be provided that is adapted for removable mounting on trailer 10. Replacement pumping module can be utilized for pumping liquid nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or other chemicals or fluids as needed, to increase the versatility of the system and broaden operational range and capacity. In a conventional system, if a nitrogen pump is required, a separate unit truck/trailer unit must be brought to the site and tied into the fractioning spread. In contrast, the presently described operation allows for a replacement nitrogen module with generally the same dimensions as fractioning module 20, so that the replacement module can fit into the same slot on the trailer as fractioning module 20 would. Trailer 10 can contain all the necessary electrical power distributions as required for a nitrogen pump module so no modifications are required. The same concept would apply to carbon dioxide pump modules or any other pieces of equipment that would be required. Instead of another truck/trailer, a specialized replacement module can instead be utilized.

(59) Natural gas is considered to be the cleanest, most efficient fuel source available. By designing and constructing fit for purpose equipment that is powered by natural gas, it is expected that the fracturing footprint, manpower, and maintenance requirements can each be reduced by over 60% when compared with traditional diesel-powered operations.

(60) In addition, the presently described electric powered fracturing operation resolves or mitigates environmental impacts of traditional diesel-powered operations. For example, the presently described natural gas powered operation can provide a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions as compared to diesel-powered operations. In an illustrative embodiment, a fractioning site utilizing the presently described natural gas powered operation would have a carbon dioxide emissions level of about 2200 kg/hr, depending upon the quality of the fuel gas, which represents an approximately 200% reduction from carbon dioxide emissions of diesel-powered operations. Also, in an illustrative embodiment, the presently described natural gas powered operation would produces no greater than about 80 decibels of sound with a silencer package utilized on turbine 30, which meets OSHA requirements for noise emissions. By comparison, a conventional diesel-powered fractioning pump running at full rpm emits about 105 decibels of sound. When multiple diesel-powered fractioning pumps are running simultaneously, noise is a significant hazard associated with conventional operations.

(61) In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric-powered fractioning operation described herein can also be utilized for offshore oil and gas applications, for example, fracturing of a wellbore at an offshore site. Conventional offshore operations already possess the capacity to generate electric power on-site. These vessels are typically diesel over electric, which means that the diesel powerplant on the vessel generates electricity to meet all power requirements including propulsion. Conversion of offshore pumping services to run from an electrical power supply will allow transported diesel fuel to be used in power generation rather than to drive the fracturing operation, thus reducing diesel fuel consumption. The electric power generated from the offshore vessel's power plant (which is not needed during station keeping) can be utilized to power one or more fracturing modules 10. This is far cleaner, safer and more efficient than using diesel powered equipment. Fracturing modules 10 are also smaller and lighter than the equipment typically used on the deck of offshore vessels, thus removing some of the current ballast issues and allowing more equipment or raw materials to be transported by the offshore vessels.

(62) In a deck layout for a conventional offshore stimulation vessel, skid based, diesel powered pumping equipment and storage facilities on the deck of the vessel create ballast issues. Too much heavy equipment on the deck of the vessel causes the vessel to have higher center of gravity. Also, fuel lines must be run to each piece of equipment greatly increasing the risk of fuel spills. In illustrative embodiments of a deck layout for an offshore vessel utilizing electric-powered fractioning operations as described herein, the physical footprint of the equipment layout is reduced significantly when compared to the conventional layout. More free space is available on deck, and the weight of equipment is dramatically decreased, thus eliminating most of the ballast issues. A vessel already designed as diesel-electric can be utilized. When the vessel is on station at a platform and in station keeping mode, the vast majority of the power that the ship's engines are generating can be run up to the deck to power modules. The storage facilities on the vessel can be placed below deck, further lowering the center of gravity, while additional equipment, for instance, a 3-phase separator, or coiled tubing unit, can be provided on deck, which is difficult in existing diesel-powered vessels. These benefits, coupled with the electronic control system, gives a far greater advantage over conventional vessels.

(63) While the present description has specifically contemplated a fracturing system, the system can be used to power pumps for other purposes, or to power other oilfield equipment. For example, high rate and pressure pumping equipment, hydraulic fracturing equipment, well stimulation pumping equipment and/or well servicing equipment could also be powered using the present system. In addition, the system can be adapted for use in other art fields requiring high torque or high rate pumping operations, such as pipeline cleaning or dewatering mines.

(64) It is to be understood that the subject matter herein is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or illustrative embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. Accordingly, the subject matter is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.