Decontamination of sulfur contaminants from a vessel
11850551 ยท 2023-12-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C02F2103/365
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
B01D53/76
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method for treating sulfur contaminants is provided. The method comprises introducing a methylmorpholine-N-oxide solution to a vessel, wherein the vessel comprises a water layer and a gas layer, wherein the water layer and the gas layer comprise the hydrogen sulfide; introducing methylmorpholine-N-oxide into the water layer; and treating the water layer by allowing the methylmorpholine-N-oxide to react with the hydrogen sulfide.
Claims
1. A method for removing hydrogen sulfide, comprising: (A) introducing a methylmorpholine-N-oxide solution to a vessel, wherein the vessel comprises a water layer and a gas layer, wherein the water layer and the gas layer comprise the hydrogen sulfide, and wherein the water layer further comprises an iron oxide; (B) introducing methylmorpholine-N-oxide into the water layer; wherein the methylmorpholine-N-oxide comprises between about 0.01 weight volume % and about 60 weight volume % methylmorpholine-N-oxide of the gas layer; (C) treating the water layer by allowing the methylmorpholine-N-oxide to react with the hydrogen sulfide; (D) treating the gas layer by allowing the hydrogen sulfide in the water layer to react with the methylmorpholine-N-oxide; and (E) introducing steam to the vessel, wherein steam removes at least a portion of the hydrogen sulfide from the water layer; (F) adjusting a hydrogen sulfide rate of evaporation by increasing the vessel temperature; and (G) adjusting a hydrogen sulfide rate of condensation by decreasing the vessel temperature.
2. A method for removing hydrogen sulfide, comprising: (A) introducing a methylmorpholine-N-oxide solution to a vessel, wherein the vessel comprises a water layer and a gas layer, wherein the water layer and the gas layer comprise the hydrogen sulfide, and wherein the water layer further comprises an iron oxide; (B) introducing methylmorpholine-N-oxide into the water layer; (C) treating the water layer by allowing the methylmorpholine-N-oxide to react with the hydrogen sulfide; (D) introducing steam to the vessel, wherein steam removes at least a portion of the hydrogen sulfide from the water layer; (E) treating the gas layer by allowing the hydrogen sulfide in the water layer to react with the methylmorpholine-N-oxide; and (F) recirculating between about one volume of the water layer in the vessel to about two volumes of water layer in the in the vessel, wherein the recirculating further comprises heating the water layer; and (G) adjusting a hydrogen sulfide rate of condensation by decreasing the vessel temperature.
3. A method for removing hydrogen sulfide, comprising: (A) introducing a methylmorpholine-N-oxide solution to a vessel, wherein the vessel comprises a water layer and a gas layer, wherein the water layer and the gas layer comprise the hydrogen sulfide, and wherein the water layer further comprises an iron oxide; (B) introducing methylmorpholine-N-oxide into the water layer; (C) treating the water layer by allowing the methylmorpholine-N-oxide to react with the hydrogen sulfide; (D) introducing steam to the vessel, wherein steam removes at least a portion of the hydrogen sulfide from the water layer; (E) increasing the temperature of the water layer; (F) treating the gas layer by allowing the hydrogen sulfide in the water layer to react with the methylmorpholine-N-oxide; and (G) adjusting a hydrogen sulfide rate of condensation by decreasing the vessel temperature.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising adjusting a hydrogen sulfide rate of condensation by increasing the pressure in the vessel.
5. The method of claim 3, further comprising adjusting a hydrogen sulfide rate of condensation by increasing a surface area of an interface between the water layer and the gas layer.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) For a detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(6)
(7) In embodiments as shown in
(8) The water layer 15 and the gas layer 20 may be contaminated with the sulfur contaminants by any method of contamination. The sulfur contaminants may be provided to the water layer 15 and the gas layer 20 from any source. The sulfur contaminants may be present in the water layer 15 and the gas layer 20 at any concentration. Without limitation, the sulfur contaminants may be present in the water layer 15 and/or the gas layer 20 in an amount in a range including any of and between any of about 100 ppm to about 180,000 ppm. For example, the sulfur contaminants may be present in the water layer 15 and the gas layer 20 in an amount of about 100 ppm, about 500 ppm, about 1000 ppm, about 5000 ppm, about 10,000 ppm, about 15,000 ppm, about 50,000 ppm, about 100,000 ppm, about 150,000 ppm, about 180,000 ppm, or any ranges therebetween.
(9)
(10) In the embodiments shown in
(11) With continued reference to
(12)
(13) As with
(14) With continued reference to
(15) With reference to
(16) After the desired reaction time occurs (i.e., sulfide conversion is about complete), the treated water 35 (i.e., treated water) may be drawn off from vessel 10 and nonhazardous products 40 may also be removed from vessel 10. Treated water 35 may be sent to any desired location such as a water treatment plant. In embodiments, treated water 35 has no sulfur contaminants. Nonhazardous products 40 include nonhazardous sulfur reaction products along with other native solids in vessel 10 (i.e., sludge). Nonhazardous products 40 may be removed from vessel 10 by any suitable means. In an embodiment, the means include a centrifuge. In embodiments, the liquid portion of the effluent passing from the centrifuge may then be routed to a treatment facility or any other desirable location.
(17) In the embodiments shown in
(18) In embodiments as shown in
(19) To further illustrate various illustrative embodiments of the present invention, the following examples are provided.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
(20) A purpose of this Example was to determine the extent of the reaction of morpholine-N-oxide on a sulfur contaminant (i.e. H.sub.2S) in water at varying mole ratios. The experiments were conducted at 40 C. and 60 C. At all mole ratios (morpholine-N-oxide:H.sub.2S) down to and including 1.0:1.0, the destruction of H.sub.2S was complete at 60 C. after 24 hours. Elemental sulfur was a visible product. This sulfur was present as platelets (flakes). After 24 hours at 40 C., the reaction was complete only at a mole ratio of 3.0:1.0, although nearly complete reactions were recorded at ratios of 2.0:1.0 and 1.8:1.0. Reactions at lower mole ratios were variously incomplete and consistent with the lower loadings. After 48 hours at 40 C., the reaction was complete at all mole ratios except for the lowest loading (1.0:1.0). The product was variously present as a milky suspension and flaked solids.
(21) For the experiment, a pint of archived sour water at pH-8.5 was used with an H.sub.2S content at 9,985 mg/liter (0.293 M/lit). The molecular weight of the solid methylmorpholine-N-oxide was 126.0. A methylmorpholine-N-oxide stock solution was prepared by dissolving 5.00 grams in 100.0 mLs distilled water (0.397 M/lit). To each of several screw-capped sample vials, 2.0 mLs of the sour water and a dash of powdered iron rust were added. The vials were then diluted with 15 mLs of distilled water and the following volumes of methylmorpholine-N-oxide were added.
(22) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sample Makeup [Methylmorpholine-N-oxide] = 0.397 M/lit [H.sub.2S] = 0.293 M/lit (@ pH~8.5)~0.5 gm Fe.sub.2O.sub.3xH.sub.2O Volume Mole ratio methylmorpholine- (Methylmorpholine-N- N-oxide stock oxide: H.sub.2S) 1.477 mLs 1.0:1 1.772 mLs 1.2:1 2.067 mLs 1.4:1 2.363 mLs 1.6:1 2.658 mLs 1.8:1 2.953 mLs 2.0:1 4.430 mLs 3.0:1
(23) Three such series were prepared. Each series was treated as follows: series 1: heated at 40 C. for 24 hours (static), series 2: heated at 40 C. for 48 hours (static), series 3: heated at 60 C. for 24 hours (static). At termination of the reaction periods, the entire contents of each reaction vial were emptied into 20 mls of sulfide anti-oxidant buffer, and each was titrated with 0.100 M/lit Pb. The results are shown below.
(24) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Reaction of Morpholine-N-oxide on H.sub.2S for 24 Hours @ 40 C. Sample mls Pb.sup.++ Gms H.sub.2S Titrated Gms H.sub.2S Added % Reacted 1.0:1 1.9 0.00019 0.000585 68% 1.2:1 1.8 0.00018 0.000585 69% 1.4:1 1.7 0.00017 0.000585 71% 1.6:1 0.7 0.00007 0.000585 88% 1.8:1 0.4 0.00004 0.000585 93% 2.0:1 0.3 0.00003 0.000585 95% 3.0:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100%
(25) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Reaction of Morpholine-N-oxide on H.sub.2S for 48 Hours @ 40 C. Sample mls Pb.sup.++ Gms H.sub.2S Titrated Gms H.sub.2S Added % Reacted 1.0:1 0.4 0.00004 0.000585 93% 1.2:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.4:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.6:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.8:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 2.0:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 3.0:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100%
(26) Elemental sulfur, present as small platelets, had been precipitated during reaction.
(27) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Reaction of Morpholine-N-oxide on H.sub.2S for 24 Hours @ 60 C. Sample mls Pb.sup.++ Gms H.sub.2S Titrated Gms H.sub.2S Added % Reacted 1.0:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.2:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.4:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.6:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 1.8:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 2.0:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100% 3.0:1 0.0 0.00000 0.000585 100%
(28) Elemental sulfur, present as small platelets, had been precipitated during reaction.
Example 2
(29) A purpose of this example was to determine if a lower ratio than 1.0:1.0 of methylmorpholine-N-oxide:sulfide will completely remove sulfide from solution. The experiments were conducted at 40 C. and 60 C. At a mole ratio of 0.7:1.0 (methylmorpholine-N-oxide:H.sub.2S), the oxidation and removal of sulfide appeared to be 98%-99% complete.
(30) A pint of archived sour water at pH-8.5 was used that had an H.sub.2S content at 8,016 mg/liter (0.250 M/lit). A sample of solid 4-methylmorpholine-N-oxide was determined to have a molecular weight of 126.0. A 4-methylmorpholine-N-oxide stock solution was prepared by dissolving 5.00 grams in 100.0 mls distilled water (0.397 M/lit). To each of four screw-capped sample vials, 2.0 mls of the sour water and an amount of powdered iron rust were added. The vials were diluted to 20 mls with distilled water after adding 0.822 mls of 4-methylmorpholine-N-oxide, which amounted to a reaction ratio of 0.7:1.0.
(31) Two of the samples were placed in a 40 C. bath for a reaction time of 48 hours. The other two were placed in a 60 C. bath for 24 hours. At termination of the reaction periods, the entire contents of a reaction vial from each bath were emptied into 20 mls of sulfide anti-oxidant buffer, and each was titrated with 0.100 M/lit Pb.sup.++. The sample reacted at 40 C. required 0.10 mls of the Pb titrant, and the sample reacted at 60 C. required 0.05 mls. These analysis results calculated to 99% and 98% destruction of sulfide in the tests.
(32) The second samples from these reactions were acidified with H.sub.2SO.sub.4. This was done in order to determine if there was any odor of residual H.sub.2S. There was no odor of H.sub.2S. Instead, there was the unmistakable odor of SO.sub.2. A common reaction product of N-oxides with sulfur is thiosulfate. When thiosulfate is acidified, it disproportionates, forming SO.sub.2. Elemental sulfur, present as small platelets, had been formed during both reactions.
Example 3
(33) A sample from a large sour water tank was tested. Methylmorpholine-N-oxide with added temperature of 50 C. was found to reduce hydrogen sulfide to 0 ppm in 19 hours or less. During the course of the testing, discoveries were made about the catalytic effect of the voluminous corrosion solids in the tank. When such solids were present, methylmorpholine-N-oxide trials at ambient temperatures were found to be complete with hydrogen sulfide at 0 ppm after 24 hours treatment time. Other trials where the solids were removed prior to methylmorpholine-N-oxide treatment demonstrated that methylmorpholine-N-oxide reduced hydrogen sulfide to 0 ppm in six days at ambient conditions.
(34) A sample of the tank was taken and found to be black from suspended corrosion solids (Fe.sub.2O.sub.3+FeS). Various analyses were conducted in order to determine H.sub.2S content so that a methylmorpholine-N-oxide dose could be calculated. Prior readings were 800-900 ppm H.sub.2S. A test using a CHEMETS sulfide colorimetric test kit estimated 400-500 ppm H.sub.2S. Iodometric titration gave an H.sub.2S result of 600-700 ppm on the whole sample, and 400-500 ppm H.sub.2S on filtered sample.
(35) The first demonstration was performed under standard conditions where treatments were assisted by heating at 50 C. Two different dosage levels were prepared using newly-made as well as eight month old formulation. One sample was run at ambient conditions. The test make-ups are below in Table 5.
(36) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Reaction of Morpholine-N-oxide on H.sub.2S for 19 Hours @ Varying Temperatures First Tank Sample methylmorpholine-N- Temp (mL) oxide:H.sub.2S mole ratio ( C.) 15 1.5:1 50 15 3:1 50 15 3:1 50 15 3:1 Ambient
(37) After 19 hours under the test conditions described above, the heated samples were observed to be completely reacted (H.sub.2S=0 ppm). Also, the ambient sample was mostly reacted as evidenced by a cloudy yellow solution, which is typical for that course of the reaction.
(38) Verification of the completion of H.sub.2S oxidation was seen in the lead acetate test strips. A dark strip was untreated, the clear strip included the three heated samples with H.sub.2S=0 ppm, and another strip was the ambient sample that was seen to be much lighter. A subsequent test with CHEMETS colorimetric sulfide kit indicated the H.sub.2S levels in the ambient sample to be well below 100 ppm H.sub.2S. These tests suggested that the presence of significant amounts of corrosion material were such a sufficient catalyst for timely methylmorpholine-N-oxide reactions that heat may not be a necessity in every application.
(39) Lab trials were initiated to study the effectiveness of methylmorpholine-N-oxide at low dose rates and under ambient conditions. The sample array was intended to study the reaction rate of methylmorpholine-N-oxide with and without the iron oxide catalytic solids and also varying dose rates. One sample represented the most extreme test of methylmorpholine-N-oxideambient conditions with no iron oxide present and a methylmorpholine-N-oxide:H.sub.2S ratio of 1:1 (i.e., the lowest theoretical dose rate possible). Test parameters were summarized in Table 6.
(40) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Reaction of Morpholine-N-oxide on H.sub.2S for 24 Hours @ Ambient Temperatures Mole ratio methylmorpholine-N- oxide:H.sub.2S Solids Level Temperature 1:1 Minimal Ambient 1.5:1 Minimal Ambient 1.5:1 Abundant - Sx Shaken Ambient
(41) After 24 hours of exposure, methylmorpholine-N-oxide was found to produce complete eradication of H.sub.2S in the sample with solids as evidenced. This was consistent with the ambient test with solids above. Also, the higher dose sample with no solids looked to be turning a darker shade of yellow, which indicated some initial progress in reaction.
(42) Both of the samples with no solids present were also seen to progressively react with all the H.sub.2S as well, at much longer reaction times. A summary of the results is included in Table 7.
(43) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Summary of H.sub.2S Treatment Results Solids Present Mole Ratio Time to H.sub.2S = 0 ppm Yes 1.5:1 24 hours No 1.5:1 6 days No 1:1 (theoretical minimum) 12 days
Example 4
(44) A sample was obtained comprising 9,066 ppm H.sub.2S as measured using a CHEMETS sulfide colorimetric test kit. Prior readings indicated the sample had a H.sub.2S concentration greater than 12,000 ppm. A sample of solid 4-methylmorpholine-N-oxide was determined to have a molecular weight of 126.0. A 4-methylmorpholine-N-oxide stock solution was prepared by dissolving 5.00 grams in 100.0 mls distilled water (0.397 M/lit). The sample was distributed into three separate sample vials comprising 20 mL of the original sample. To each of the three sample vials an amount of powdered iron rust was added. Methylmorpholine-N-oxide was added to the three vials in an amount of 2, 2.5, and 3.8 mLs to provide a ratio of methylmorpholine-N-oxide:H.sub.2S of 1.5:1, 2:1, and 3:1 respectively. The three samples were placed in a 50 C. bath for a reaction time of 24 hours. The results are shown in Table 8.
(45) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Reaction of Morpholine-N-oxide on H.sub.2S for 24 Hours methylmorpholine-N- Estimated Completed oxide:H.sub.2S mole ratio Reaction Time 1.5:1 >32 2:1 26 3:1 <24
(46) The 3:1 sample reached reaction completion at less than 24 hours. The 2:1 sample reached reaction completion at 26 hours. The 1.5:1 sample had not reached reaction completion by 32 hours when the experiment was stopped, however, the appearance of the vile indicated that some measure of the H.sub.2S had been treated.
(47) The preceding description provides various embodiments of the systems and methods of use disclosed herein which may contain different method steps and alternative combinations of components. It should be understood that, although individual embodiments may be discussed herein, the present disclosure covers all combinations of the disclosed embodiments, including, without limitation, the different component combinations, method step combinations, and properties of the system. It should be understood that the compositions and methods are described in terms of comprising, containing, or including various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also consist essentially of or consist of the various components and steps. Moreover, the indefinite articles a or an, as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one or more than one of the element that it introduces.
(48) For the sake of brevity, only certain ranges are explicitly disclosed herein. However, ranges from any lower limit may be combined with any upper limit to recite a range not explicitly recited, as well as, ranges from any lower limit may be combined with any other lower limit to recite a range not explicitly recited, in the same way, ranges from any upper limit may be combined with any other upper limit to recite a range not explicitly recited. Additionally, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit and an upper limit is disclosed, any number and any included range falling within the range are specifically disclosed. In particular, every range of values (of the form, from about a to about b, or, equivalently, from approximately a to b, or, equivalently, from approximately a-b) disclosed herein is to be understood to set forth every number and range encompassed within the broader range of values even if not explicitly recited. Thus, every point or individual value may serve as its own lower or upper limit combined with any other point or individual value or any other lower or upper limit, to recite a range not explicitly recited.
(49) Therefore, the present embodiments are well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, and may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Although individual embodiments are discussed, the disclosure covers all combinations of all of the embodiments. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. Also, the terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of those embodiments. If there is any conflict in the usages of a word or term in this specification and one or more patent(s) or other documents that may be incorporated herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with this specification should be adopted.