Porcine cell line for virus production
11060069 ยท 2021-07-13
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C12N7/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12N2760/16151
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a continuous porcine cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components. Further, the present invention relates to a method for producing a virus using said cell line and a virus obtainable by said method. Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method for accumulating a virus from an environmental sample using said cell line and a virus obtainable by said method.
Claims
1. A continuous and non-adherent kidney or testis porcine cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components, wherein the cell line comprises an endogenous protease for activation of virus infectivity, wherein the cell line is infected with a virus or transfected with a plasmid carrying (a) nucleic acid sequence(s) encoding a virus, and wherein the virus carries a protease cleavage site cleavable by said endogenous protease, and wherein the virus is a virus of the Orthomyxoviridae or Paramyxoviridae family.
2. The continuous porcine cell line of claim 1, wherein the cell line is porcine kidney-15S (PK-15S).
3. The continuous porcine cell line of claim 2, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3307.
4. The continuous porcine cell line of claim 1, wherein the cell line is swine testis S (STS).
5. The continuous porcine cell line of claim 4, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3308.
6. The continuous porcine cell line of claim 1, wherein the virus is an influenza virus or Newcastle disease virus.
7. A method for producing a virus comprising the steps of: providing a continuous and non-adherent porcine kidney or testis cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components and that is permissive for the virus, wherein the cell line comprises an endogenous protease for activation of virus infectivity, (ii) infecting said cell line with the virus or transfecting said cell line with a plasmid carrying (a) nucleic acid sequence(s) encoding the virus, and (iii) culturing the cell line infected or transfected in step (ii), thereby producing the virus, wherein the virus carries a protease cleavage site cleavable by said endogenous protease, and wherein the virus is a virus of the Orthomyxoviridae or Paramyxoviridae family.
8. The method of claim 7, which does not require the addition of an exogenous protease for activation of virus infectivity.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the cell line is PK-15S.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3307.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein the cell line is STS.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3308.
13. The method of claim 7, wherein the virus is an influenza virus or Newcastle disease virus.
14. A continuous and non-adherent porcine cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3307.
15. A continuous and non-adherent porcine cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3308.
16. A method for producing a virus comprising the steps of: (i) providing a continuous and non-adherent porcine cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components and that is permissive for a virus, (ii) infecting said cell line with the virus or transfecting said cell line with a plasmid carrying (a) nucleic acid sequence(s) encoding the virus, and (iii) culturing the cell line infected or transfected in step (ii), thereby producing the virus, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3307.
17. A method for producing a virus comprising the steps of: (i) providing a continuous and non-adherent porcine cell line that is capable of proliferating in medium free of animal-derived components and that is permissive for a virus, (ii) infecting said cell line with the virus or transfecting said cell line with a plasmid carrying (a) nucleic acid sequence(s) encoding the virus, and (iii) culturing the cell line infected or transfected in step (ii), thereby producing the virus, wherein the cell line is deposited at the DSMZ with the deposit number DSM ACC3308.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1) The following Figures and examples are merely illustrative of the present invention and should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention as indicated by the appended claims in any way.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
EXAMPLES
(8) The examples given below are for illustrative purposes only and do not limit the invention described above in any way.
(9) 1.1 Stable Adaption to Single-Cell Suspension Cultivation
(10) Adaptation of adherent cells to proliferation in suspension and without dependence on serum is complex and unique for each cell line [46,47]. However, this step is important to obtain a system suitable for veterinary vaccine production that requires efficient, robust and highly cost-effective solutions. The significant advantages of single-cell suspension production systems suitable for cultivation in scalable bioreactors is briefly discussed in the context of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) vaccines [48], but the same considerations apply for all veterinary and human vaccines, especially if they are required at higher volumes and doses. The burden associated with bovine serum are discussed in the context of introduction of adventitious agents to pharmaceutical products [46].
(11) Successful adaptation to proliferation without serum and to proliferation in suspension induces profound changes in cell cultures. The affected cell lines must be guided through modulations in metabolic pathways, apoptotic cascades, cytoskeleton integrity, and intracellular vesicle targeting.
(12) Metabolic pathways shift because the wide spectrum of growth factors cannot be provided by chemically-defined medium or plant hydrolysates. Apoptosis needs to remain suppressed also in the absence of protective serum factors, and receptors responsible for anoikis induction must ignore absence of adhesion signals that are normally provided by the growth support and neighbouring cells. The cytoskeleton, a pervasive structure throughout the cell, must rearrange with the transition from anchored fusiforms to the artificially induced spheres. Finally, transport of cellular (and viral) components along actin filaments and microtubule tracks must be reorganized as cell polarity is lost in a suspension cell without basal and apical surfaces. The results are observable extensive and global shifts in the genome and proteome [49] so that parental cell and derived progeny are highly divergent and not interchangeable anymore. To avoid ambiguities due to this development, the cell lines that have shifted signalling and metabolic pathways towards a novel generation are denoted with the suffix S.fwdarw.G+(PK-15S.fwdarw.G+, STS.fwdarw.G+, or abbreviated PK-15S and STS).
(13) The process towards adaptation was characterized by phases with very low proliferation rates and viabilities that had to be alternated with subtle changes to the media and culture formats to prevent loss of the cultures.
(14) The experimental steps were the following: The adherent PK-15 cells were trypsinized and re-suspended to approx. 1510.sup.6 cells/mL in a cell culture medium based on CD-U4. CD-U4 cell culture medium is a modification of DMEM and can be obtained, for example, from GE Healthcare under catalogue T1313. Viability and cell density immediately decreased significantly (see
(15) A stable culture that proliferated in single-cell suspension without dependence on microcarriers could be maintained in chemically-defined medium at cell densities between 0.310.sup.6 and at least 1010.sup.6 cells/mL starting with week 16 (corresponding to passage 21). A stirred-tank bioreactor was inoculated out of this stable culture at passage 26, the culture was maintained for at least additional 8 weeks to demonstrate that adaptation has been accomplished. No animal-derived components and no trypsin was used after passage 5 and, therefore, was also not used towards inoculation of the bioreactor.
(16) A culture stably adapted to proliferation in suspension in chemically defined medium free of animal-derived components was also obtained of the ST cell line. This cell line transiently required supplementation with 30-60 mg/L putrescine, 30-50 mg/L spermine, 5-25 L/L TrypLE, 200 ng/mL insuline, 1-3 g/L soy hydrolysate, 0.05% methylcellulose, and 600-900 mg/L NaCl in addition to the components given above for full adaptation.
(17) A continuous passage history in media free of animal derived components is highly desirable. Animal derived components, especially bovine serum, can be contaminated with adventitious agents that can cause disease in vaccine recipients and that complicate trans-boundary dissemination of vaccine preparations [46]. Cryocultures of the PK-15S and STS cell lines were submitted according to the Budapest Treaty to the DSMZ on Sep. 21, 2016 and received the deposit numbers DSM ACC3307 and DSM ACC3308, respectively. Both cryocultures were obtained out of cultures that proliferate in animal-derived component free medium (the medium for PK-15S is even chemically-defined), they were passaged at least 10 times in such medium, and they are stored in preservation medium free of animal-derived components.
(18) In summary, a robust adaptation to continuous proliferation in medium free of animal derived components in true suspension is demonstrated for the PK-15 and ST cell lines for the first time.
(19) 1.2 Cell Line Identity and Purity
(20) Cell line cross-contamination is a frequent problem. To confirm that the here described PK-15S cell line is pure, PCR was performed to examine cell identity.
(21) Fehler! Verweisquelle konnte nicht gefunden werden.
(22) The banding pattern in
(23) In summary, the here described PK-15S and STS cultures are pure and identifiable. Most importantly, the presence of simian or canine material was not observed, previously demonstrated to be highly permissive for influenza viruses, in PK-15S or STS cultures.
(24) 1.3 High Titers after Influenza Virus Infection
(25) Orthomyxoviruses depend on proteolytic activation of the viral receptor, the HA protein, very similar to the paramyxoviruses [33-35]. The embryonal tissues provide the required proteases if vaccines are produced in embryonated eggs. The proteases contained in embryonated eggs are replaced by exogenous trypsin for production of myxovirus vaccines in cell cultures.
(26) Influenza A viruses (AIVs) isolated with the help of cell lines have been proposed to be suitable as vaccine seeds [50]. Important parameters in the determination of vaccine properties are infectious units as an indicator for active viruses present in the preparations. Another important parameter is the haemagglutinating activity on erythrocyte preparations from chicken, horse or guinea pig as an indicator for the amount of potentially reactogenic antigen present in the vaccine harvest.
(27) The hemagglutinating and infectious activities of at least three different low pathogenic Influenza A viruses (LPAIVs) propagated in the suspension PK-15S cells in true suspension cultures in chemically-defined medium without microcarriers and at extremely low MOIs compare favourably, or are even superior to the results reported in MDCK cells [50,51] or obtained here as reference and that are shown in
(28) The results shown in
(29) The cells were subcultivated between 810.sup.5 viable cells/mL and 610.sup.6 viable cells/mL for routine passaging, usually with two splits per week. Subpassage was performed by at least 5-fold dilution of the cell suspension without any centrifugation.
(30) Infectious titers of LPAIVs were determined on Vero cells. 1.510.sup.6 cells in DMEM:F12 medium containing 2 mM GlutaMAX I (both Gibco) and 5% fetal calf serum (Biochrom) were seeded into CellBIND 96-well plates (Corning) at 100 L of cell suspension. The medium was replaced on the following day against DMEM:F12 containing 2 mM GlutaMAX I and 1.5 g/mL trypsin (type IX-S, Sigma T0303), but no fetal calf serum. Serial dilutions in steps of 10 of LPAIV-containing virus samples were prepared in DMEM:F12 medium free of serum, and 10 L each of the dilutions were added to the Vero cultures. Virus replication was allowed at 37 C. for 72 h and detected by the cytopathic effect. Calculation of TCID.sub.50 values was performed according to Spearman and Krber using the implementation of the FAO [52, 53].
(31) Haemagglutination units (HAU) were determined with chicken erythrocytes and serial dilutions of infected cell suspensions in PBS in steps of 2. Erythrocytes from 7 mL of a 25% complete blood suspension in Alsever buffer (E200, Labor Dr. Merk & Kollegen GmbH, Germany) were washed thrice in cold PBS and diluted in PBS to a concentration that yields an OD of 2.9 to 3.1 at 576 nm. This suspension was stored for up to one week at 4 C. Centrifugation for the washing steps was performed at room temperature with 500g, brake set to low, for 5 min each.
(32) The assay was performed in round-bottom 96-well microtiter plates. The first row of the plate was filled with 200 L of the crude culture supernatant and all other rows received 100 L of PBS. Next, 100 L of virus sample was added to the second row, the pipetting tips were replaced and the suspension mixed with fresh tips. This two-fold dilution was continued serially into the next row, and, for samples with high potency, continued into a second plate. Each well thus contained 100 L of diluted virus sample and was subsequently supplemented with 100 L of the erythrocyte suspension. This volume was mixed by pipetting and the turbid solution allowed to stand undisturbed for 60 min at ambient temperature (22 C.). HAU/100 L are given by the highest dilution where formation of the characteristic dot was not yet visible.
(33) The bioreactor experiments were conducted in DASBox (DASGip, Eppendorf) bioreactor units. These stirred-tank reactors are equipped with a Marine impeller with 3 blades and 60-250 mL working-volume vessels. Gas mixing was performed with N2, air, CO.sub.2 and O.sub.2. The pH was adjusted with CO.sub.2 and 1 M Na.sub.2CO.sub.3. Inoculation was performed to 0.810.sup.6 PK-15S and 110.sup.6 BHK cells/mL in CD-U4 medium and the culture was allowed to proliferate for 4 days to approximately 310.sup.6 cells/mL. Glutamine was usually added to 2 mM at day 4 and glucose to 6 g/L at day 5. (see
(34) The parameters for the cell proliferation phase were 37 C. culture temperature, 60% DO (dissolved oxygen) saturation in the medium, 180 rpm for the impeller, and a pH 7.1. The pH was increased to 7.5 units as a gradient over 6 h after infection.
(35) Trypsin (type IX-S, Sigma T0303) was added automatically to the infected culture to 16 U/mL of reactor volume per day in 4 burst of 4 mL each separated by 6 hours. This particular trypsin is provided as 1 g lyophylisate that was resuspended to 1 mg/mL in PBS. Specific activity depends on the lot and was 18500 U/mg in our experiments. Addition of 16 U/mL therefore corresponds to less than 0.9 g/mL of trypsin which is well below the toxic level in the range of 2.5 g/mL.
(36) In summary, for the first time, a PK-15S cell line was demonstrated to allow production of LPAIV seed viruses to high infectious and haegglutinating titers in a stirred tank bioreactor in chemically defined medium. The results were at least as good as those obtained with MDCK.
(37) 1.4 Independent of Trypsin
(38) The virions of many viruses such as ortho- and paramyxoviruses must be proteolytically processed for activation of the infectious units. The proteases contained in embryonated eggs are sufficient to activate influenza and Newcastle disease viruses. The addition or ectopical expression [54] of exogenous trypsin or other proteases is required for production of these viruses in cell cultures.
(39) It would be highly advantageous, and very unusual, if a continuous cell line would allow production of influenza virus isolates independent of exogenously added trypsin and only with a natively inherent cognate protease activity. Such an inherent property may help in the identification and production of viruses, e.g. of low-pathogenic field isolates. Such a property is clearly different from the introduction of selected non-cognate proteases by genetic recombination.
(40) To test for such a property requires a cell line that robustly proliferates in a medium as the here described chemically-defined cell proliferation medium with a very low protein content (10 ng/mL of recombinant IGF) and without other substances that may interfere with the enzymatic activity of proteases.
(41) Infectious titers and HA titers of LPAIVs were determined as described above. Detection of NDV replication in the titration plates was facilitated by immunostaining: the Vero indicator cells were fixed in methanol for 10 min, allowed to dry to completion, and rehydrated with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20. NDV antiserum (GD Animal Health) was added to a dilution of 1:2000 in PBS containing 1% fetal calf serum and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After two washes with PBS, secondary antibody (anti-chicken, Alexa Fluor 488 labelled, host rabbit, Dianova, 303-545-003 at 1 g/L) was added at a dilution of 1:2000 for 2 h at ambient temperature or overnight at 4 C. Infected wells were identified by fluorescence after two washes with PBS.
(42) The HA units were determined as described for LPAIVs above with one modification, titration was performed with sonicated, rather than crude cell lysate. Sonication was performed using a Vial Tweeter (set to 20 s of 100% cycle and 90% amplitude) that allows handling of closed sample caps to avoid cross-contamination (Hielscher, Germany).
(43) The results are shown in
(44) In summary, a cell culture system that does not require exogenous trypsin, and that allows propagation of LPAIVs to very high hemagglutinating and infectious titers has been developed.
(45) 1.5 the Protease in the Porcine Cell Lines is Endogenous
(46) It has further been quantified whether the protease of the porcine cell lines is active intracellularly as has been described for human airway epithilium [55,56]. Serum contains a wide spectrum of high-molecular weight protease inhibitors [57] that would interfere with exogenous proteases (such as trypsin) or proteases that are being secreted by the host cell or contained in the vaccine preparation.
(47) The data shown in
(48)
(49) That the endogenous activity is unusually high in the PK-15S and STS cell lines in combination with the suspension culture format and in medium free of animal derived components can be inferred from the high susceptibility and high permissivity. For example, the infectious yield for any of the tested strains (H5N3, H7N7 or M9N2) in PK-15S was at least 10.sup.6 TCID.sub.50/mL, the MOI was 10.sup.4 viruses/cell, and cell density was 210.sup.6 cells/mL. The input was, thus, of (210.sup.6 cells/mL)(10.sup.4 TCID.sub.50/cell)=200 TCID.sub.50/mL. The burst size was (10.sup.6 TCID.sup.50/mL): (200 TCID.sub.50/mL)=5000. A burst size higher than 100 demonstrates high permissivity and that productive infection with such a burst size is obtained with a MOI of only 10.sup.4, 10-fold below 0.001, demonstrates high susceptibility.
(50) An unusually broad investigation has been presented that includes industrially relevant avian, canine and porcine cell lines. The data shown in
REFERENCES
(51) 1. Richard, M.; de Graaf, M.; Herfst, S. Avian influenza A viruses: from zoonosis to pandemic. Future Virol. 2014, 9, 513-524. 2. Li, F. C. K.; Choi, B. C. K.; Sly, T.; Pak, A. W. P. Finding the real case-fatality rate of H5N1 avian influenza. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008, 62, 555-559. 3. Sonnberg, S.; Webby, R. J.; Webster, R. G. Natural history of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1. Virus Res. 2013, 178, 63-77. 4. Simon-Grif, M.; Martin-Valls, G. E.; Vilar, M. J.; Busquets, N.; Mora-Salvatierra, M.; Bestebroer, T. M.; Fouchier, R. A.; Martin, M.; Mateu, E.; Casal, J. Swine influenza virus infection dynamics in two pig farms; results of a longitudinal assessment. Vet. Res. 2012, 43, 24. 5. Ma, W.; Garca-Sastre, A.; Schwemmle, M. Expected and Unexpected Features of the Newly Discovered Bat Influenza A-like Viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004819. 6. Hause, B. M.; Collin, E. A.; Liu, R.; Huang, B.; Sheng, Z.; Lu, W.; Wang, D.; Nelson, E. A.; Li, F. Characterization of a novel influenza virus in cattle and Swine: proposal for a new genus in the Orthomyxoviridae family. mBio 2014, 5, e00031-00014. 7. Kobasa, D.; Jones, S. M.; Shinya, K.; Kash, J. C.; Copps, J.; Ebihara, H.; Hatta, Y.; Kim, J. H.; Halfmann, P.; Hata, M.; Feldmann, F.; Alimonti, J. B.; Fernando, L.; Li, Y.; Katze, M. G.; Feldmann, H.; Kawaoka, Y. Aberrant innate immune response in lethal infection of macaques with the 1918 influenza virus. Nature 2007, 445, 319-323. 8. Gambotto, A.; Barratt-Boyes, S. M.; de Jong, M. D.; Neumann, G.; Kawaoka, Y. Human infection with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus. Lancet 2008, 371, 1464-1475. 9. Ma, W.; Kahn, R. E.; Richt, J. A. The pig as a mixing vessel for influenza viruses: Human and veterinary implications. J. Mol. Genet. Med. Int. J. Biomed. Res. 2008, 3, 158-166. 10. Bano, S.; Naeem, K.; Malik, S. A. Evaluation of pathogenic potential of avian influenza virus serotype H9N2 in chickens. Avian Dis. 2003, 47, 817-822. 11. Sun, Y.; Liu, J. H9N2 influenza virus in China: a cause of concern. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 18-25. 12. Monne, I.; Hussein, H. A.; Fusaro, A.; Valastro, V.; Hamoud, M. M.; Khalefa, R. A.; Dardir, S. N.; Radwan, M. I.; Capua, I.; Cattoli, G. H9N2 influenza A virus circulates in H5N1 endemically infected poultry population in Egypt. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2013, 7, 240-243. 13. Wan, H.; Sorrell, E. M.; Song, H.; Hossain, M. J.; Ramirez-Nieto, G.; Monne, I.; Stevens, J.; Cattoli, G.; Capua, I.; Chen, L.-M.; Donis, R. O.; Busch, J.; Paulson, J. C.; Brockwell, C.; Webby, R.; Blanco, J.; Al-Natour, M. Q.; Perez, D. R. Replication and transmission of H9N2 influenza viruses in ferrets: evaluation of pandemic potential. PloS One 2008, 3, e2923. 14. Wan, H.; Perez, D R Amino acid 226 in the hemagglutinin of H9N2 influenza viruses determines cell tropism and replication in human airway epithelial cells. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 5181-5191. 15. Ito, T.; Couceiro, J. N.; Kelm, S.; Baum, L. G.; Krauss, S.; Castrucci, M. R.; Donatelli, I.; Kida, H.; Paulson, J. C.; Webster, R. G.; Kawaoka, Y. Molecular basis for the generation in pigs of influenza A viruses with pandemic potential. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 7367-7373. 16. Sheta, B. M.; Fuller, T. L.; Larison, B.; Njabo, K. Y.; Ahmed, A. S.; Harrigan, R.; Chasar, A.; Abdel Aziz, S.; Khidr, A.-A. A.; Elbokl, M. M.; Habbak, L. Z.; Smith, T. B. Putative human and avian risk factors for avian influenza virus infections in backyard poultry in Egypt. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 168, 208-213. 17. Capua, I.; Marangon, S. Control of avian influenza in poultry. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1319-1324. 18. Swayne, D.; Brown, I. Chapter 2.3.4. Avian Influenza. OIE Man. Diagn. Tests Vaccines Terr. Anim. 2015, 1, 436-454. 19. Ackland, N. R.; Tannock, G. A.; Young, I. F. A device for the nondestructive decontamination of large volumes of infected egg waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49, 920-924. 20. Enserink, M. Influenza. Crisis underscores fragility of vaccine production system. Science 2004, 306, 385. 21. Hoa, L. K.; Hiep, L. V.; Be, L. V. Development of pandemic influenza vaccine production capacity in Viet Nam. Vaccine 2011, 29 Suppl 1, A34-36. 22. Sambo, E.; Bettridge, J.; Dessie, T.; Amare, A.; Habte, T.; Wigley, P.; Christley, R. M. Participatory evaluation of chicken health and production constraints in Ethiopia. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 118, 117-127. 23. Osterrieder, N.; Schumacher, D. A continuous cell line for the production of vaccines. WO/2003/066093 A1. 2002. 24. Uscher-Pines, L.; Barnett, D. J.; Sapsin, J. W.; Bishai, D. M.; Balicer, R. D. A systematic analysis of influenza vaccine shortage policies. Public Health 2008, 122, 183-191. 25. Chua, J. V.; Chen, W. H. Bench-to-bedside review: vaccine protection strategies during pandemic flu outbreaks. Crit. Care Lond. Engl. 2010, 14, 218. 26. Bni, J.; Stalder, J.; Reigel, F.; Schpbach, J. Detectionof reverse transcriptase activity in live attenuated virus vaccines. Clin. Diagn. Virol. 1996, 5, 43-53. 27. David, S. A. W.; Volokhov, D. V.; Ye, Z.; Chizhikov, V. Evaluation of Mycoplasma inactivation during production of biologics: egg-based viral vaccines as a model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2718-2728. 28. Doroshenko, A.; Halperin, S. A. Trivalent MDCK cell culture-derived influenza vaccine Optaflu (Novartis Vaccines). Expert Rev. Vaccines 2009, 8, 679-688. 29. Gregersen, J.-P.; Schmitt, H.-J.; Trusheim, H.; Brker, M. Safety of MDCK cell culture-based influenza vaccines. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 143-152. 30. Parvin, R.; Shehata, A. A.; Heenemann, K.; Gac, M.; Rueckner, A.; Halami, M. Y.; Vahlenkamp, T. W. Differential replication properties among H9N2 avian influenza viruses of Eurasian origin. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 75. 31. Trombetta, C.; Piccirella, S.; Perini, D.; Kistner, O.; Montomoli, E. Emerging Influenza Strains in the Last Two Decades: A Threat of a New Pandemic? Vaccines 2015, 3, 172-185. 32. Skowronski, D. M.; Janjua, N. Z.; De Serres, G.; Sabaiduc, S.; Eshaghi, A.; Dickinson, J. A.; Fonseca, K.; Winter, A.-L.; Gubbay, J. B.; Krajden, M.; Petrie, M.; Charest, H.; Bastien, N.; Kwindt, T. L.; Mahmud, S. M.; Van Caeseele, P.; Li, Y. Low 2012-13 influenza vaccine effectiveness associated with mutation in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain not antigenic drift in circulating viruses. PloS One 2014, 9, e92153. 33. Zhirnov, O. P.; Ovcharenko, A. V.; Bukrinskaya, A. G. Myxovirus replication in chicken embryos can be suppressed by aprotinin due to the blockage of viral glycoprotein cleavage. J. Gen. Virol. 1985, 66 (Pt 7), 1633-1638. 34. Muramatsu, M.; Homma, M. Trypsin action on the growth of Sendai virus in tissue culture cells. V. An activating enzyme for Sendai virus in the chorioallantoic fluid of the embryonated chicken egg. Microbiol. Immunol. 1980, 24, 113-122. 35. Rott, R.; Reinacher, M.; Orlich, M.; Klenk, H. D. Cleavability of hemagglutinin determines spread of avian influenza viruses in the chorioallantoic membrane of chicken embryo. Arch. Virol. 1980, 65, 123-133. 36. Garten, W.; Bosch, F. X.; Linder, D.; Rott, R.; Klenk, H. D. Proteolytic activation of the influenza virus hemagglutinin: The structure of the cleavage site and the enzymes involved in cleavage. Virology 1981, 115, 361-374. 37. Nagai, Y.; Shimokata, K.; Yoshida, T.; Hamaguchi, M.; Iinuma, M.; Maeno, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Klenk, H. D.; Rott, R. The spread of a pathogenic and an apathogenic strain of Newcastle disease virus in the chick embryo as depending on the protease sensitivity of the virus glycoproteins. J. Gen. Virol. 1979, 45, 263-272. 38. Steinhauer, D. A. Role of hemagglutinin cleavage for the pathogenicity of influenza virus. Virology 1999, 258, 1-20. 39. Gong, W.; Zhang, L.; Lu, Z.; Jia, J.; Wang, M.; Peng, Z.; Guo, H.; Shi, J.; Tu, C. Complete genome sequence of a novel sub-subgenotype 2.1 g isolate of classical swine fever virus from China. Arch. Virol. 2016. 40. Delrue, I.; Van Gorp, H.; Van Doorsselaere, J.; Delputte, P. L.; Nauwynck, H. J. Susceptible cell lines for the production of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by stable transfection of sialoadhesin and CD163. BMC Biotechnol. 2010, 10, 48. 41. Ma, C.; Song, H.; Guan, K.; Zhou, J.; Xia, X.; Li, F. Characterization of swine testicular cell line as immature porcine Sertoli cell line. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2016, 52, 427-433. 42. Li, I. W. S.; Chan, K. H.; To, K. W. K.; Wong, S. S. Y.; Ho, P. L.; Lau, S. K. P.; Woo, P. C. Y.; Tsoi, H. W.; Chan, J. F. W.; Cheng, V. C. C.; Zheng, B. J.; Chen, H.; Yuen, K. Y. Differential susceptibility of different cell lines to swine-origin influenza A H1N1, seasonal human influenza A H1N1, and avian influenza A H5N1 viruses. J. Clin. Virol. Off. Publ. Pan Am. Soc. Clin. Virol. 2009, 46, 325-330. 43. Herman, M.; Haugerud, S.; Malik, Y. S.; Goyal, S. M. Improved in vitro cultivation of swine influenza virus. Int J Appl Res Vet Med 2005, 3, 124-128. 44. Ngunjiri, J. M.; Mohni, K. N.; Sekellick, M. J.; Schultz-Cherry, S.; Webster, R. G.; Marcus, P. I. Lethal H5N1 influenza viruses are not resistant to interferon action in human, simian, porcine or chicken cells. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1456-1457. 45. Jordan, I.; Munster, V. J.; Sandig, V. Authentication of the R06E fruit bat cell line. Viruses 2012, 4, 889-900. 46. Hawkes, P. W. Fetal bovine serum: geographic origin and regulatory relevance of viral contamination. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2015, 2, 1. 47. Rodrigues, M. E.; Costa, A. R.; Henriques, M.; Cunnah, P.; Melton, D. W.; Azeredo, J.; Oliveira, R. Advances and drawbacks of the adaptation to serum-free culture of CHO-Kl cells for monoclonal antibody production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 169, 1279-1291. 48. Silva, A. C.; Delgado, I.; Sousa, M. F. Q.; Carrondo, M. J. T.; Alves, P. M. Scalable culture systems using different cell lines for the production of Peste des Petits ruminants vaccine. Vaccine 2008, 26, 3305-3311. 49. de la Luz-Hernndez, K. R.; Rojas-del Calvo, L.; Rabasa-Legon, Y.; Lage-Castellanos, A.; Castillo-Vitlloch, A.; Daz, J.; Gaskell, S. Metabolic and proteomic study of NSO myeloma cell line following the adaptation to protein-free medium. J. Proteomics 2008, 71, 133-147. 50. Donis, R. O.; Influenza Cell Culture Working Group; Influenza Cell Culture Working Group; Davis, C. T.; Foust, A.; Hossain, M. J.; Johnson, A.; Klimov, A.; Loughlin, R.; Xu, X.; Tsai, T.; Blayer, S.; Trusheim, H.; Colegate, T.; Fox, J.; Taylor, B.; Hussain, A.; Barr, I.; Baas, C.; Louwerens, J.; Geuns, E.; Lee, M.-S.; Venhuizen, O.; Neumeier, E.; Ziegler, T. Performance characteristics of qualified cell lines for isolation and propagation of influenza viruses for vaccine manufacturing. Vaccine 2014, 32, 6583-6590. 51. Ren, Z.; Lu, Z.; Wang, L.; Huo, Z.; Cui, J.; Zheng, T.; Dai, Q.; Chen, C.; Qin, M.; Chen, M.; Yang, R. Rapid production of a H9N 2 influenza vaccine from MDCK cells for protecting chicken against influenza virus infection. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 2999-3013. 52. Bross, I. Estimates of the LD50; a critique. Biometrics 1950, 6, 413-423. 53. Litamoi, J.; Palya, V. J.; Sylla, D.; Rweyemamu, M. M. Quality control testing of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia live attenuated vaccine. Standard operating procedure 2: Estimation of viable Mycoplasma Content of CBPP Vaccines (Microtitration Method). Website: fao.org/docrep/003/v9952e00.htm (accessed April 2015). FAO Anim. Prod. Health Pap. 1996, 128. 54. Bttcher, E.; Freuer, C.; Steinmetzer, T.; Klenk, H.-D.; Garten, W. MDCK cells that express proteases TMPRSS2 and HAT provide a cell system to propagate influenza viruses in the absence of trypsin and to study cleavage of HA and its inhibition. Vaccine 2009, 27, 6324-6329. 55. Bttcher, E.; Matrosovich, T.; Beyerle, M.; Klenk, H.-D.; Garten, W.; Matrosovich, M. Proteolytic activation of influenza viruses by serine proteases TMPRSS2 and HAT from human airway epithelium. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 9896-9898. 56. Zhirnov, O. P.; Ikizler, M. R.; Wright, P. F. Cleavage of influenza a virus hemagglutinin in human respiratory epithelium is cell associated and sensitive to exogenous antiproteases. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 8682-8689. 57. Travis, J.; Salvesen, G. S. Human plasma proteinase inhibitors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1983, 52, 655-709.