CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURE OF GRAPHENIC COMPOUNDS

Abstract

Provided herein are high throughput continuous or semi-continuous reactors and processes for manufacturing graphenic materials, such as graphene oxide. Such processes are suitable for manufacturing graphenic materials at rates that are up to hundreds of times faster than conventional techniques, have little batch-to-batch variation, have a high degree of tunability, and have excellent performance characteristics.

Claims

1. A process for manufacturing a graphenic compound, the process comprising: a. injecting a first stock into a first inlet of a continuous or semi-continuous reactor, the first stock comprising graphite; b. optionally injecting a second stock into a second inlet of the continuous reactor, the second stock comprising potassium permanganate; c. optionally injecting a third stock into a third inlet of the continuous or semi-continuous reactor, the third stock comprising an oxidizing or quenching agent and being injected downstream from the injection point of the first and/or second stock(s); d. optionally injecting a fourth stock into a fourth inlet of the continuous reactor, the fourth stock comprising water and being injected downstream from the injection point of the first, second, and third stocks; and e. collecting the graphenic compound from an outlet of the continuous reactor, the graphene oxide being collected downstream from the injection points of the first, second, third, and fourth stocks.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein the continuous reactor has a flow from the first inlet to the outlet, the flow being a vortex flow.

3. The process of claim 2, wherein the vortex flow is a toroidal vortex flow.

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the continuous reactor is configured to produce a toroidal vortex flow.

5. The process of claim 4, wherein the toroidal vortex flow comprises a plurality of non-axisymmetric toroidal vortices.

6. The process of claim 1, wherein the continuous reactor is a continuous Taylor-Couette reactor.

7. The process of claim 1, wherein the continuous reactor comprises a reactor chamber into which the first, second, third, and fourth stocks are injected; the reactor chamber being configured between an outer wall of a first cylindrical body and the inner wall of a second cylindrical body or bore, one or both of the first and/or second cylindrical bodies rotating around the axis thereof.

8. The process of claim 7, wherein the first and second cylindrical bodies are rotating in opposite directions.

9. The process of claim 1, wherein the fluid stock further comprising phosphoric acid and wherein the quenching agent is hydrogen peroxide.

10. (canceled)

11. The process of claim 1, wherein the graphite is intercalated with sulfuric acid, bisulfate, sulfate, or a combination thereof upstream of injection of the third stock.

12. (canceled)

13. The process of claim 1, wherein the graphite is converted to graphite oxide upstream of injection of the fourth stock.

14. (canceled)

15. The process of claim 13, wherein covalent sulfates of the graphite oxide are hydrolyzed and interlayer registry of the graphite oxide is lost downstream of injection of the fourth stock and upstream of collection of the graphene oxide.

16. (canceled)

17. The process of claim 13, wherein the graphene oxide is in the form of a particle comprising more than one graphene oxide sheet, on average, or a particle comprising about 2 to about 20 graphene oxide sheets, on average.

18. (canceled)

19. The process of claim 1, wherein the first stock comprises graphite in a concentration of about 0.1 wt. % to about 50 wt. %.

20. A process for manufacturing graphene oxide, the process comprising: a. injecting a first stock into a toroidal vortex flow, the first stock comprising graphite and sulfuric acid, and the continuous flow reactor configured to produce a toroidal vortex flow; b. optionally injecting a second stock into the toroidal vortex flow, the second stock comprising potassium permanganate; c. optionally injecting a third stock into the toroidal vortex flow, the third stock comprising an oxidizing agent and being injected downstream from the injection point of the first and/or second stock(s); d. optionally injecting a fourth stock into a fourth inlet of the continuous flow reactor, the fourth stock comprising water and being injected downstream from the injection point of the first, second and third stocks; and e. collecting graphene oxide.

21.-22. (canceled)

23. A continuous or semi-continuous reactor or reactor system comprising: a. a first body, the first body comprising an outer wall; b. a second body, the second body comprising an inner wall, the inner wall defining a bore, the first body being configured within the bore; c. a reaction chamber, the reaction chamber being configured between the outer wall of the first body and the inner wall of the second body; d. a first inlet, the first inlet being configured in fluid communication with the reaction chamber; and e. a first outlet, the first outlet being configured in fluid communication with the reaction chamber.

24.-25. (canceled)

26. The reactor or reactor system of claim 23, wherein the outer wall of the first body defines a cylindrical body and wherein the inner wall of the second body defines a cylindrical bore.

27. (canceled)

28. The reactor or reactor system of claim 23, wherein the first body and/or second body independently comprise a stainless-steel alloy, an austenitic stainless steel, an austenitic chromium-nickel stainless steel, a super duplex stainless steel alloy, polytetrafluoroethylene, glass coated metal, borosilicate glass, polytetrafluoroethylene coated metal, nickel-chromium-molybdenum-tungsten alloy, stainless steel with silicon, a NiFeCr Mo alloy, a NiCrMo alloy, an alloy, lead, high silicon cast iron, cast iron, ductile iron, any combination thereof.

29. The reactor or reactor system of claim 23, further comprising a cooling jacket or cooling coil in at least partial surrounding relation to the second body or a heating jacket or heating coil in at least partial surrounding relation to the second body.

30. (canceled)

31. The reactor or reactor system of claim 23, further comprising a stock reservoir in fluid contact with the first inlet.

32.-60. (canceled)

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:

[0043] FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary process whereby a graphenic compound (graphene oxide) is prepared utilizing a reactor or process described herein.

[0044] FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic of an exemplary toroidal flow reactor provided herein, with a variety of inlets and an outlet.

[0045] FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of an exemplary toroidal reactor provided herein, with a plurality of toroidal (Taylor) vortices.

[0046] FIG. 4 illustrates XRD traces of exemplary graphite materials utilized in processes and compositions herein.

[0047] FIG. 5 illustrates XRD traces of various graphene oxide materials preparable from various batch synthesis techniques.

[0048] FIG. 6 illustrates a trace of an FTIR pattern of an exemplary graphene oxide materials obtained from a batch reactor using reagents that do not include sodium nitrate.

[0049] FIG. 7 illustrates a trace of an FTIR pattern of an exemplary graphene oxide materials obtained from a batch reactor using reagents that do not include phosphoric acid.

[0050] FIG. 8 illustrates a trace of an XRD pattern of an exemplary graphenic material obtained from a toroidal batch reactor (30 minutes).

[0051] FIG. 9 illustrates a trace of an FTIR pattern of an exemplary graphenic material obtained from a toroidal batch reactor (30 minutes).

[0052] FIG. 10 illustrates a trace of an XRD pattern of an exemplary graphenic material obtained from a toroidal batch reactor (60 minutes).

[0053] FIG. 11 illustrates a trace of an FTIR pattern of an exemplary graphenic material obtained from a toroidal batch reactor (60 minutes).

[0054] FIG. 12 illustrates a schematic of an exemplary semi-continuous toroidal flow reactor provided herein, with an inlet (additional inlets are optional) and an outlet.

[0055] FIG. 13 illustrates a trace of an XRD pattern of an exemplary graphenic material obtained from a semi-continuous toroidal reactor (30 minutes).

[0056] FIG. 14 illustrates a schematic of an exemplary continuous toroidal flow reactor provided herein, with an inlet (additional inlets are optional) and an outlet.

[0057] FIG. 15 illustrates a trace of an XRD pattern of an exemplary graphenic material obtained from a continuous toroidal reactor (10 minutes).

[0058] FIG. 16 illustrates traces of FTIR patterns of an exemplary graphene oxide materials obtained from a batch reactor using identical reagents and reaction conditions.

[0059] FIG. 17 illustrates traces of FTIR patterns of an exemplary graphene oxide materials obtained from a toroidal reactor using identical reagents and reaction conditions.

[0060] FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary system provided herein comprising a plurality of exemplary reactors provided herein.

[0061] FIG. 19 illustrates various exemplary flow types of a process or reactor provided herein

[0062] FIG. 20 illustrates XRD images of the resulting material prepared according to a process provided herein using various flow types.

[0063] FIG. 21 illustrates interlayer spacing and multi-layered characteristics of exemplary graphenic materials prepared according to exemplary processes provided herein.

[0064] FIG. 22 illustrates 2D Raman spectra G Peak results of various exemplary graphenic structures provided herein.

[0065] FIG. 23 illustrates 2D Raman spectra G, D, and 2D peak results of various exemplary graphenic structures provided herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0066] Provided in certain embodiments herein are processes and systems for manufacturing graphenic components, such as graphene oxide, including single layer graphene oxide and/or multi-layered graphene oxide. Also provided herein are compositions used to make graphenic products described herein and/or the graphenic products produced or produce-able by processes or from compositions described herein. In specific instances, the processes provided herein are continuous or semi-continuous (flow) processes. In certain instances, processes provided herein facilitate greatly improved (reduced) manufacturing times for graphenic products. Moreover, in some instances, processes provided herein facilitate greater control of the interaction between reagents of the processes thereof, providing greater control of and greater quality control of resulting graphenic products. For example, in certain embodiments, provided herein are processes that are utilized to control the degree of oxidation, the type of oxidation, the number of layers, the lateral dimension, other characteristics, or combinations thereof of graphenic products produced thereby. In addition, with the ability to precisely control flow, rotation/vortex parameters, and inputs characteristics, timing and location, greater quality control of the resultant products is achieved, whether the graphenic product is first out, last out, somewhere in-between, or even during a different run or using a separate system.

[0067] In specific embodiments, provided herein is a process for manufacturing a graphenic compound (e.g., graphene oxide), the process comprising: [0068] a. injecting a first stock into a first inlet of a continuous or semi-continuous reactor, the first stock comprising graphite; [0069] b. collecting the graphenic compound (e.g., graphene oxide) from an outlet of the continuous reactor, the graphenic compound being collected downstream from the injection points of the first stock.

[0070] In specific embodiments, the reactor having a fluid flowing therein, the flow having a flow type as described herein (e.g., laminar flow, toroid flow, vortex flow, stable vortex flow (non-wavy vortex flow), vortex flow without laminar flow, Taylor vortex flow (TVF), or the like). In some instances, the fluid within the reactor comprises the first (graphite) stock, such as alone or in combination with one or more other fluid provided to the reactor.

[0071] FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary process whereby a graphenic compound (graphene oxide) is prepared utilizing a reactor or process described herein. As illustrated, graphite 101 is provided, the graphite 101 comprising a plurality of tightly packed graphene sheets 102. In some instances, the graphite 101 is exposed to a strong acid, oxidizing agent and/or intercalating agent 103, such as sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, sodium nitrate, potassium permanganate, any combination of one or more thereof, or other suitable agent. As intercalation occurs, a graphite intercalation compound (GIC) 104 is provided. In specific instances, as in FIG. 1, a stage-1 graphite intercalation compound (GIC) 104 is provided (e.g., a stage-1 graphite intercalation compound 104 wherein the layered structure comprising graphite layers 106 alternating with intercalation layers 105, whereas a stage-2 graphite intercalation compound has an intercalation layer alternating with every two graphite layers). In various instances, the intercalation layer comprises any suitable material, and depends on the intercalation agent utilized. For example, in specific instances, such as wherein sulfuric acid is utilized, the intercalation layer comprises sulfuric acid, bisulfate, sulfate, and/or any combination thereof.

[0072] In some instances, following intercalation of the graphite 101 to form the graphite intercalation compound (GIC) 104, the graphite intercalation compound (GIC) is oxidized by exposure to an oxidizing agent 107. As illustrated in FIG. 1, exposure of the graphite intercalation compound (GIC) 104 to the oxidizing agent 107 produces a graphite oxide (e.g., pristine graphite oxide (PGO)) 108, which comprises graphite oxide layers 110 and may comprise an intercalation layer 109 (which may be the same or different from the intercalation layer 105 of the graphite interaction compound (GIC) 104). In some instances, workup of the graphite oxide 108 is utilized to produce graphene oxide. For example, use of a water-based (aqueous) stock 111 is utilized in some instances to partially or fully exfoliate the graphite oxide 108 to form multilayered graphene oxide or single layer graphene oxide 112.

[0073] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a process and a reactor 200 provided herein. As illustrated, the reactor 200 comprises a reaction chamber 201 into which the stock(s) are injected, the reactor chamber 201 being configured between an outer wall of a first body 202 and an inner wall of a second body 203. In specific embodiments, the outer wall of the first body defines a cylindrical body and the inner wall of the second body defines a cylindrical bore. In some instances, the first body 202 and/or second body 203 is configured to rotate about an axis 204 thereof. In certain embodiments, the wall(s) of the cylindrical body and/or bore rotate(s) around an axis of the respective cylinder body and/or bore. The cylindrical body and/or bore form any suitable shape, such as a circular cylinder, an elliptical cylinder, a right cylinder, an oblique cylinder, or the like. In certain embodiments, the cylindrical bore and/or body is optionally substituted with conical frustum bore and/or body, respectively. In various embodiments, the first body and the second body (e.g., inner and outer walls or surfaces thereof, respectively) comprise any suitable material. In some embodiments, the first body and the second body (e.g., inner and outer wall or surfaces thereof, respectively) independently is or comprises a stainless-steel alloy (e.g., 304 stainless steel, 310M stainless steel), an austenitic stainless steel (e.g., Avesta 254 SMO), an austenitic chromium-nickel stainless steel (e.g., 316 stainless steel), a super duplex stainless steel alloy (e.g., ZERON 100), polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g., TEFLON), glass (e.g., borosilicate) coated metal, borosilicate glass, polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g., TEFLON) coated metal, nickel-chromium-molybdenum-tungsten alloy (e.g., Alloy 22), stainless steel with silicon, a NiFeCrMo alloy (e.g., Alloy 20, Alloy G-30, Alloy 33, Cronder 2803 Mo), a NiCrMo alloy (e.g., Alloy C-22, Alloy-C-276, Hastelloy C-2000), an alloy (e.g., LEWMET, Hastelloy D-205, Sandvik HT 9076), lead, high silicon cast iron, cast iron (e.g., Meehanite, grey cast iron), ductile iron (e.g., MONDI), any combination thereof, or the like.

[0074] As illustrated, the reactor has at least one inlet 205 configured to receive a stock, particularly a graphite stock (e.g., a stock comprising a graphite 206, such as in a suspension). In some instances, the graphite stock further comprises an intercalating agent or a strong acid 207. The reactor further comprises at least one outlet 208, from which product is extracted from the reactor. In the case of a continuous flow reactor, the extracted product comprises the graphenic component (e.g., single or multi-layered graphene oxide) 209. In the case of a semi-continuous or semi-batch reactor, the extracted product is injected back into the reactor one or more times until a graphenic component is ultimately collected from the reactor. In some instances, however, it is to be understood that a reaction herein is optionally stopped short of production of a graphenic component, and any intermediate product described herein is optionally collected from the outlet. In general, the reactor facilitates the flow 210 of the stock(s) and/or reagents from one or more inlet 205 of the reactor to one or more outlet 208 of the reactor 200. Moreover, with one or more of the inner cylinder or the inner surface of the bore cylinder rotating relative to the other, the flow has a toroidal aspect 211. Moreover, as illustrated in the expanded view 212 of the cut-out 213, the flow of the fluid within the reactor comprises, in some instances, a plurality of vortices (a vortex flow herein) 214. In some instances, a batch reactor configured such as described herein can be configured to provide a plurality of stirred domains (e.g., the series of domains or vorticies can be considered a series of continuous stirred tank reactors) or vortices such as illustrated in the expanded view of 212, wherein each of the plurality of vortices have a toroidal shape, such as illustrated in FIG. 3. In certain instances, with the flow 210 of a continuous or semi-continuous reactor 200 herein, the toroidal shapes of the vortices 214 are distorted (e.g., forming distorted toroidal vortices), such as forming vortices with a helical shape (e.g., forming helical vortices).

[0075] As illustrated in FIG. 2, additional inlets are optionally included in a reactor provided herein. In certain instances, a continuous or semi-continuous reactor provided herein comprises at least one additional inlet for injecting one or more reagent into the reactor. As illustrated in the reactor 200, in certain embodiments, the reactor 200 comprises, in some embodiments, a second inlet 215 facilitating the injection of an a quenching or oxidizing agent, or other desired agent, 216 into the reactor chamber 201. In the case of a semi-continuous reactor, a second inlet is optionally utilized to inject any or all non-graphitic stock into the reactor chamber. As exemplarily illustrated, the second inlet 215 is downstream from the first inlet 205. In some instances, a reactor 200 provided herein comprises a (optional) third inlet 217, such as for injecting water or an aqueous solution 218 into the reactor chamber 201. Additional inlets can also be provided, as desired. For example, the reactor 200 of FIG. 2 illustrates in additional inlet 219 that is near the first inlet 205, the additional inlet 219 being configured for injecting a strong acid, oxidizing agent and/or intercalating agent (including agents that facilitate intercalation of the graphite, such as potassium permanganate) 220 into the reactor chamber 201.

[0076] In more specific instances, FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic of a continuous synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) sheets from graphite in a continuous flow reactor (e.g., Taylor-Couette reactor (TCR)) 200. In specific instances, a suspension of graphite flakes 206 in H.sub.2SO.sub.4 and/or H.sub.3PO.sub.4 207 is introduced at one inlet 205, while KMn.sub.2O.sub.4 220 solution is added at the other inlet 219 to loosen up graphitic layers, leading to the formation of form stage-1 graphite intercalation compound (GIC). An oxidizing agent 216 such as hydrogen peroxide is added to convert the stage-1 GIC into oxidized graphite, pristine graphite oxide (PGO). The third step is conversion of PGO into conventional GO after exposure to water 218, which involves hydrolysis of covalent sulfates and loss of all interlayer registry. In some instances, this approach does not generate toxic gas and the temperature is easily controlled, which is important, in some instances, for large scale production of GO. Such inputs and processes are optionally modified, such as described herein, e.g., to tune, modify and/or optimize throughput, output materials, or the like.

[0077] In certain embodiments, a reactor provided herein has a (e.g., fluid) flow (e.g., within the chamber thereof) from an input to an output. In other words, one or more fluid stock (e.g., solutions, suspensions, or combinations thereof) is input into the reactor via one or more inlet, such one or more fluid stocks mixing and flowing toward and out of one or more outlet, at least one outlet being down-flow (downstream) from the one or more inlet. In various embodiments, any suitable flow is provided within the reactor (e.g., chamber thereof), such as a toroidal flow, a vortex flow (e.g., a Taylor vortex flow), a laminar flow (e.g., a Couette flow), a turbulent flow, and/or the like. In some embodiments, the fluid has a toroidal flow. In certain embodiments, the fluid has a vortex flow, such as a toroidal vortex flow (e.g., wavy vortex or Taylor vortex flow). In some embodiments, a reactor provided herein is configured to provide a vortex flow, e.g., toroidal vortex flow, within a reactor chamber thereof. In certain embodiments, the flow is a modified Taylor-Couette flow (Taylor-Couette with axial flow) and/or the reactor is a continuous Taylor-Couette reactor. In specific embodiments, the flow dynamics are configured by adjustment of flow rate, drum size, bore size, gap between the inner wall and the outer wall, rotation speed, or any combination thereof. FIG. 2 illustrates a Taylor vortex flow, however, depending on the rotation speed, other flow types can be observed in the reactor.

[0078] FIG. 19 illustrates the Couette (laminar) flow observed at slow (inner) rotational speeds (e.g., wherein Ta<Ta.sub.c). Further, as illustrated in FIG. 19, when Ta exceeds Tac, vortexes form, but when Ta is close to Tac, instabilities (vortexes) form near the reactor inlet, but as the flow continues toward the reactor exit, laminar flow resumes. This type of flow is illustrated as primary instabilities (PI). As Ta increases, instabilities form throughout the reactor, forming a Taylor vortex flow (TVF). Increasing the Ta/Ta.sub.c further, however, creates a secondary instability (SI), where a wavy flow is observed near the inlet of the reactor. Further increase of Ta/Ta.sub.c leads to a full wavy vortex flow (VWF). In some embodiments, the flow is a stable laminar (e.g., Couette) flow and/or a flow having a Ta/Ta.sub.c of less than 1, such as less than 0.9, such as less than 0.8 (e.g., 0.5 to 0.9 or 0.6 to 0.8). In certain embodiments, the flow is a stable vortex (e.g., Taylor) flow and/or a flow having a Ta/Ta.sub.n of about 1.05 to about 1.4, such as about 1.05 to about 1.3, such as about 1.1 to about 1.2.

[0079] FIG. 20 illustrates the results of injecting graphite into a reactor herein, with the various flow types illustrated in FIG. 19. As illustrated in FIG. 20, after just one minute, in a reactor having a (stable) laminar or Couette (shearing) flow is observed to have excellent conversion of graphite to graphenic compound (graphene oxide). By contrast the primary instability flow is observed to have good conversion to the graphenic compound, but some graphite remains. The stable vortex flow (Taylor vortex flow) is observed to provide excellent conversion of graphite to the graphenic compound, with no graphite component observed. By contrast, both flows having wavy morphologies and that use the most amount of energy produced good conversion of graphite to graphenic compound (graphene oxide), but had significant amounts of graphite also observed.

[0080] In various embodiments, a process provided herein utilizes or a system herein comprises any suitable reactor, such as a toroidal reactor. In some embodiments, the toroidal reactor is a toroidal flow reactor, a toroidal batch reactor, or the like. In various embodiments, the toroidal flow reactor is a toroidal continuous flow reactor, or a toroidal semi-continuous (semi-batch) reactor. FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary toroidal semi-continuous (semi-batch) reactor provided herein. As illustrated, the reactor 1200 has at least one inlet 1201 and at least one outlet. In some instances, the reactor is charged via an opening or via the inlet 1201, such as with graphite and other reaction agents, such as described herein. After being subjected to the reactor, a reaction mixture is expelled from the outlet 1202 and recycled back into the inlet 1202. The outlet 1202 optionally feeds directly back into the inlet 1201, or proceeds through a collection container 1203. After a desired time or number of passes through the reactor 1200, the (e.g., final) graphenic product is expelled via an outlet 1202 and collected, such as in a collection receptacle 1203. The reactants are optionally subjected to the reactor any suitable number of times (passes through the reactor), such as one or more times, two or more times, 5 or more times, 10 or more times, or the like. FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary toroidal continuous flow reactor, wherein a stock 1403 is provided to an inlet 1401 of a reactor provided herein, and the reaction product 1404 is collected via an outlet 1402 of the reactor 1400 after a single pass through the reactor.

[0081] In some embodiments, a system herein comprises (or a process provided herein comprises using) a series of reactors, such as illustrated in FIG. 18. FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary system comprising a plurality of reactors (e.g., a first reactor 1801 and a second reactor 1802) provided herein, such as wherein a stock is provided to an inlet of a first reactor 1801, a first product is provided via an outlet of the first reactor 1801, the first product is provided to an inlet of a second reactor 1802 and a second product is provided via an outlet of a second reactor 1802. FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary continuous flow reactor, but semi-batch or semi-continuous reactors of such configurations are also provided herein. In various embodiments, the first and second products are any suitable product, such as illustrated in the schematic of FIG. 1, such as wherein the first product is a graphite oxide 108, and the second product is a graphene oxide 112.

[0082] In certain embodiments, the reactor comprises one or more temperature controlled domains. In certain embodiments, a jacket or coil is positioned in at least partial surrounding relation to the outer wall of the reactor. In some instances, the temperature control domain is a cooling domain (e.g., wherein the jacket or coil comprises a coolant). In certain embodiments, a system provided herein has a first temperature controlled domain comprising a cooling domain and a second temperature controlled domain comprising a heating domain. In some instances, a first and a second reactor are provided in a system herein, such as illustrated in FIG. 18, wherein the first reactor is cooled and the second reactor is heated.

[0083] In certain embodiments, graphite utilized herein is any suitable graphite, such as natural graphite, natural graphite flake, synthetic graphite, any combination thereof, or the like. In certain embodiments, the graphite is a multi-layered structure comprising any suitable number of layers and/or having any suitable (e.g., particle) dimension or size. In certain instances, a graphite provided herein comprises at least 25 layers (e.g., graphitic carbon layers stacked on top of one another), at least 50 layers, at least 75 layers, or the like. FIG. 4 illustrates XRD patterns of exemplary graphite materials utilized in processes and compositions herein. Various graphitic particle sizes are optionally utilized, such as having an average size of at least 1 micron, at least 5 micron, at least 10 micron, at least 25 micron, at least 100 micron, or the like. In specific instances, the average particle size is less than 1 mm, less than 500 micron, less than 250 micron, less than 100 micron, or the like. Any suitable concentration of graphite is utilized in a stock and/or reactor herein. In specific embodiments, the concentration of graphite in a stock described herein is about 0.1 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, e.g., 0.5 wt. % to 50 wt. %.

[0084] In some embodiments, any suitable strong acid, oxidizing agent and/or intercalating agent provided is utilized herein. In some embodiments, the strong acid, oxidizing agent and/or intercalating agent functions to swell and/or intercalate into and/or oxidize the graphite layers. In some embodiments, the strong acid, oxidizing agent and/or intercalating agent comprises one or more of the following: sulfuric acid, bisulfate, sulfate, nitric acid, nitrate, perchloric acid, perchlorate, permanganate, phosphoric acid, phosphate, biphosphate, or the like. In the case of bisulfate, sulfate, nitrate, perchlorate, permanganate, phosphate, biphosphate, or other anion utilized, any suitable cation is optionally utilized, such as sodium, potassium, or the like. It is to be understood that in a stock, however, reference to an ion or salt herein includes reference to the compound in ionic (e.g., solvated or disassociated) or salt form. Concentrations of strong acids or intercalating agents utilized herein are present in any suitable amount.

[0085] In certain embodiments, a process herein includes subjecting a reaction mixture to a quenching agent or an additional oxidizing agent. Any suitable quenching or oxidizing agent is utilized in any method or system or composition described herein. In specific embodiments, the quenching or oxidizing agent is a peroxide, such as hydrogen peroxide (e.g., 1-50 wt. %, such as 3 wt. %, 30 wt. %, or the like hydrogen peroxide). In certain embodiments, the oxidization of the graphite (e.g., to form graphite oxide) is achieved using the strong acid and/or intercalating agent, without the need for exposure to an additional oxidizing agent or stock. In some instances, the additional agent is a quenching agent, such as to quench residual oxidizing and/or intercalating agents, strong acids, and/or the like.

[0086] FIG. 5 illustrates traces of various graphene oxide materials preparable from batch synthesis techniques. As is observed, by varying oxidizing agents/intercalating agents utilized in the process, variations in graphene oxide morphologies can be observed. Similarly, as illustrated in the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) patterns of FIG. 6 and FIG. 7, different graphene oxide materials are obtained using different oxidizing agents/intercalating agents. Moreover, as illustrated by the FTIR patterns in FIG. 16, even using the same oxidizing agents/intercalating agents can produce significant batch-to-batch variations in the graphenic products produced converting graphite to graphenic products. By contrast, in various instances herein, vortex reactors (batch and flow) produce very consistent graphene oxide materials batch-to-batch (including, in the case of flow reactors, on a run-to-run basis or a first out, last out basis). As illustrated in the FTIR patterns of FIG. 17, processes and reactors provided herein are suitable for producing highly consistent materials on a batch-to-batch basis. Moreover, by controlling, where, when and what reagents are added to the reaction, with a high degree of precision, reactors provided herein prove a highly tunable platform for produce graphenic materials. For example, as illustrated in the XRD traces of FIG. 8, FIG. 10, FIG. 13, and FIG. 15, variations in times and flow dynamics (batch, semi-continuous, continuous) of the processes provided herein, a variety of graphenic products are obtainable by processes provided herein.

[0087] FIG. 22 further illustrates the uniformity of the graphenic compounds produced according to the processes herein, particularly when using stable or Taylor vortex flows. As illustrated, the TV and SI flows produce graphenic materials with the greatest oxidation levels, whereas the wavy vortex flow produces the least oxidation, despite using the most energy. Moreover, the peak variation of the TV flow is extremely small (small error bars) compared that that of the other flows, including the SI flow, which also had high oxidation. FIG. 23 illustrates ID/IG and I2D/IG ratios, with the TVF demonstrating the smallest error bars, indicating the greatest uniformity of the graphenic compounds produced thereby. In general instances, increasing wavenumber of G band (1570 cm-1) corresponds with increasing oxidation. In typical instances, increasing intensity of D band (1350 cm-1) corresponds with increasing oxidation. In typical instances, the 2D band (2700 cm-1) corresponds with stacking and decreases with oxidation due to increasing exfoliation.

[0088] FIG. 8 illustrates an XRD pattern of a graphenic (graphene oxide) material comprising graphene oxide having a two-theta (2) value of about 9.81, an interlayer spacing of about 9.0 , and about 7 layers, on average. The composition further comprises graphite with a two-theta (2) value of about 25.4, an interlayer spacing of about 3.50 , and about 75 layers, on average. FIG. 10 illustrates an XRD pattern of a graphenic (graphene oxide) material having a two-theta (2) value of about 9.67, an interlayer spacing of about 9.1 , and about 4 layers, on average. FIG. 13 illustrates an XRD pattern of a graphenic (graphene oxide) material having a two-theta (2) value of about 8.49, an interlayer spacing of about 10.4 , and about 4 layers, on average. FIG. 15 illustrates an XRD pattern of a graphenic (graphene oxide) material having a two-theta (2) value of about 7.39, an interlayer spacing of about 12.0 , and about 6 layers, on average. Similarly, FTIR traces of exemplary graphenic materials manufactured according to a process and/or with a reactor described are illustrated in FIG. 9, FIG. 11, and FIG. 17. Provided in certain embodiments herein are compositions or graphenic material comprising any one or more such characteristic and/or approximations or variations thereof.

[0089] FIG. 21 illustrates the different interlayer spacing of the graphenic compounds prepared using the various types of flows described herein. As illustrated, Graphite has very low interlayer spacing, whereas all of the graphenic materials prepared according to a process described herein, using the various flow types described herein, produce graphenic compounds having an interlayer spacing of about 0.8 nm to about 1.1 nm (compared to less than 0.4 nm for graphite). Moreover, the graphenic compounds are observed to have fewer than 10 layers (e.g., 5 to about 10, such as about 8), as compared to about 84 (on average) for the graphite.

[0090] In certain embodiments, graphenic compounds described herein and/or produced according to a process herein have 1 to about 15 layers (e.g., on average), such as 1 to about 10 (e.g., on average), such as about 2 to about 10 layers (e.g., on average) or about 5 to about 10 layers (e.g., on average). In some embodiments, (multilayered) graphenic compounds described herein and/or produced according to a process described herein have an average interlayer spacing of about 0.8 nm to about 1.2 nm, such as about 0.8 nm to about 1 nm.

[0091] In certain embodiments, provided herein are graphenic compounds having large sizes. In some embodiments, graphenic compounds have a lateral dimension that is comparable to the size of a graphite (e.g., at least 50% the lateral dimension of the graphite, at least 60% the size of the graphite, at least 70% the size of the graphite, at least 80% the size of the graphite, or the like) from which it was produced. In certain embodiments, a graphenic compound provided herein and/or produced according to a process provided herein has a lateral dimension (e.g., longest or average lateral dimension) of at least 20 micron, such as 20 micron to about 200 micron. In some embodiments, the lateral dimension (e.g., longest or average lateral dimension) is at least 25 micron, such as 25 micron to about 200 micron. In certain embodiments, the later dimension (e.g., longest or average lateral dimension) is at least 30 micron, such as 30 micron to about 200 micron. In specific embodiments, the later dimension (e.g., longest or average lateral dimension) is at least 40 micron, such as 40 micron to about 200 micron.

EXAMPLES

Example 1Batch Graphene Oxide

[0092] Graphite is obtained from a variety of sources, including a graphite labelled as 25 micron and a graphite labelled as 150 micron. FIG. 4 illustrates a powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for the two graphite materials. As illustrated in FIG. 4, 2-theta (2) values for the two materials are similar, with a value of about 26.5. Interlayer spacing is calculated to be about 3.36 , with the materials having about 80-85 total layers.

[0093] Graphite (1 g, 25 micron) is dispersed in a mixture of 98% sulfuric acid (110 mL) and 85% phosphoric acid (25 mL) at room temperature using a mechanical stirrer. After 10 min of stirring, 4 wt equiv of KMnO.sub.4 (4 g) is added. The mixture is stirred for 6-72 hours at 0 C.-40 C. To the resultant mixture, 30% hydrogen peroxide is added and stirred at 40 C.-100 C. The resultant material is centrifuged, washed with 5% hydrochloric acid, and filtered.

[0094] Using such a process, graphene oxide is prepared, isolated, and evaluated. As illustrated in FIG. 5, the graphene oxide exhibits a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 10.7. Interlayer spacing is calculated to be about 8.25 , the multi-layered graphene oxide having about 11 layers. Graphene oxide is also prepared using a similar process, except substituting sodium nitrate (NaNO.sub.3) for the phosphoric acid. As illustrated in FIG. 5, like the graphene oxide prepared using the phosphoric acid, the graphene oxide prepared using the sodium nitrate exhibits a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 10.7 and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 8.23 . FTIR analysis of both samples is performed, as illustrated in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7. However, unlike the graphene oxide prepared using phosphoric acid, the graphene oxide prepared using sodium nitrate has significantly larger number of layers, with 18 layers.

[0095] As is illustrated by the results herein, modification and control of the oxidation and exfoliation processes of graphite in the manufacture of graphene oxide, can lead to the manufacture of significantly different graphene oxide materials.

Example 2Batch Graphene Oxide: Toroidal Reactor

[0096] Using a process similar to described in Example 1, a batch toroidal reactor (e.g., wherein components are added to the reactor chamber and sealed, without the use of the inlets and outlets described herein), such as illustrated in FIG. 3 is utilized to manufacture graphene oxide from graphite. The internal drum is rotated at a rate of about 600 revolutions per minute (rpm).

[0097] After just 30 minutes, the product is quenched with a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution. The resultant graphene oxide product is evaluated as before with two materials being observed, as illustrated by the XRD pattern of FIG. 8. The first material (identified by a first XRD peak) has a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 9.81 and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 9.01 . The graphene oxide thus provides is determined to comprise about 7 layers, on average. The second material (identified by a second XRD peak) has a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 25.4 and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 3.50 . This peak appears to correspond with unreacted or insufficiently reacted graphite, having about 75 layers, on average. FTIR analysis is also performed, as illustrated in FIG. 9.

[0098] A similar reaction is conducted for 60 minutes, the product is quenched with a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution, with a very viscous solution/suspension being observed. The resultant graphene oxide product is evaluated as before, powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 9.67 (as illustrated in FIG. 10) and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 9.13 . The graphene oxide thus provides is determined to comprise about 4 layers, on average. The graphitic peak at a 2 of about 25 is not observed. FTIR analysis is also performed, as illustrated in FIG.

[0099] Thus, in just 60 minutes complete reaction of the graphite is observed using a toroidal reactor herein, whereas many hours are required to completely transform graphite using more conventional batch techniques, such as described in Example 1. Significantly increased oxidation is observed at significantly shorter time periods for both the 30 minute and 60 minute samples as compared to the batch samples of Example 1. For example, the CO peaks of the 30 minute (FIG. 9) and 60 minute (FIG. 11) samples prepared using the (batch) toroidal reactor are much larger (relative to the other peaks) than observed for either of the samples of Example 1 (FIG. 6 and FIG. 7). Moreover, significant exfoliation of the graphene oxide is observed (i.e., the resultant graphene oxide is observed to have only about 4 layers, on average, following 60 minutes in the toroidal reaction (and workup)).

Example 3Graphene Oxide: Semi-Continuous Toroidal Reactor

[0100] Using a process similar to described in Example 2, a semi-continuous/semi-batch toroidal reactor (e.g., wherein components are added to the reactor chamber and sealed, with an outlet leading to an inlet to allow a toroidal flow within the reactor), such as illustrated in FIG. 12 is utilized to manufacture graphene oxide from graphite. The internal drum is rotated at a rate of about 600 revolutions per minute (rpm) and the flow is controlled by a pump, which is operated at a rate of 50 rpm.

[0101] After cycling for 30 minutes, the product is quenched with a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution. The resultant graphene oxide product is evaluated as before with two materials being observed, as illustrated by the XRD pattern of FIG. 13. The first material (identified by a first XRD peak) has a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 8.49 and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 10.40 . The graphene oxide thus provided is determined to comprise about 4 layers, on average. The second material (identified by a second XRD peak) has a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 26.3 and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 3.38 . This peak corresponds with graphene oxide having about 17 layers, on average.

[0102] Relative to the graphene oxide prepared by the batch process of Example 2, the graphene oxide materials in this semi-continuous example are much more highly processed after identical periods of time (30 minutes). In the batch process, the larger (graphene oxide) peak after 30 minutes has an interlayer spacing layer of 9.01 , versus the interlayer spacing of about 10.40 observed for the semi-continuous process. Moreover, the batch vortex reactor process primarily produces graphene oxide having about 7 layers after 30 minutes, whereas the semi-continuous process primarily produces graphene oxide having about 4 layers after 30 minutes.

[0103] In addition, while the batch vortex reactor process of Example 2 produces a mix of graphene oxide and graphite after 30 minutes, the semi-continuous process of Example 3 produces only graphene oxide. Where the secondary product of Example 2 after 30 minutes is graphite, the secondary product of Example 3 after 30 minutes is multi-layered graphene oxide. However, rather than the 4 layered graphene oxide of the primary product of the semi-continuous process of Example 3 and the graphite of the secondary product of the batch process of Example 2, the secondary product of Example 3 has 17 layers, on average.

[0104] Therefore, use of the semi-continuous process of Example 3 produces graphene oxide with increased exfoliation and increased interlayer spacing relative to the batch process of Example 2. Moreover, both processes produce graphene oxide at a much faster rate than the general batch process of Example 1, which takes several hours to convert graphite to graphene oxide in a suitable amount.

Example 4Graphene Oxide: Continuous Toroidal Reactor

[0105] Using a process similar to described in Example 3, a continuous toroidal reactor (e.g., wherein components are added to the reactor chamber and sealed, with inlets providing raw materials and a graphene oxide product), such as illustrated in FIG. 14 is utilized to manufacture graphene oxide from graphite. The internal drum is rotated at a rate of about 600 revolutions per minute (rpm) and the flow is controlled by a pump, which is operated at a rate of 50 rpm.

[0106] The graphite raw material is injected into the reactor and passed through the reactor in 10 minutes, whereupon the product is quenched with a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution. The resultant graphene oxide product is evaluated as before with one materials being observed, as illustrated by the XRD pattern of FIG. 15. The product (identified by a first XRD peak) has a powder XRD two-theta (2) value of about 7.39 and has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 11.95 . The graphene oxide thus provided is determined to comprise about 6 layers, on average.

[0107] Relative to the graphene oxide prepared by the batch process of Example 2 after 30 minutes, the graphene oxide materials in this continuous example are much more highly processed after just of the time (10 minutes). In the batch process, a mixture of graphene oxide and a graphite is produced after 30 minutes, whereas the continuous process produces just graphene oxide after just 10 minutes. Moreover, the graphene oxide process of the batch process of Example 2 produces graphene oxide having an interlayer spacing layer of 9.01 after 30 minutes, versus the interlayer spacing of about 11.95 observed for the continuous process after just 10 minutes. Moreover, the batch vortex reactor process primarily produces graphene oxide having about 7 layers after 30 minutes, whereas the continuous process primarily produces graphene oxide having about 6 layers after 10 minutes.

[0108] In addition, while the batch vortex reactor process of Example 2 produces a mix of graphene oxide and graphite after 30 minutes, the continuous process of Example 4 produces only graphene oxide, even after a much shorter time period (10 minutes). Where the secondary product of Example 2 after 30 minutes is graphite.

[0109] Relative to the mixed graphene oxide prepared by the semi-continuous process of Example 3 after 30 minutes, the graphene oxide materials in this continuous example are much more highly processed after just of the time (10 minutes). In the semi-continuous process, a (e.g., bimodal) mixture of graphene oxides is produced after 30 minutes, whereas the continuous process produces a largely uniform graphene oxide after just 10 minutes. Moreover, the graphene oxide process of the semi-continuous process of Example 3 produces graphene oxide having an interlayer spacing layer of 10.40 after 30 minutes, versus the interlayer spacing of about 11.95 observed for the continuous process after just 10 minutes. however, the semi-continuous vortex reactor process primarily produces graphene oxide having about 4 layers (with a secondary product having about 17 layers) after 30 minutes, whereas the continuous process primarily produces graphene oxide having about 6 layers after 10 minutes.

[0110] Therefore, use of the continuous process of Example 4 produces graphene oxide with increased exfoliation and increased interlayer spacing relative to the batch process of Example 2. Moreover, both processes produce graphene oxide at a much faster rate than the general batch process of Example 1, which takes several hours to convert graphite to graphene oxide in a suitable amount.

Example 5Graphene Oxide: Continuous Toroidal Reactor (1 Minute)

[0111] Using a process similar to described in Example 4, a continuous toroidal reactor (e.g., wherein components are added to the reactor chamber and sealed, with inlets providing raw materials and a graphene oxide product), such as illustrated in FIG. 14 is utilized to manufacture graphene oxide from graphite. The graphite raw material is injected into the reactor and passed through the reactor in just 1 minute, whereupon the product is quenched with a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution. Similar to that observed in Example 4, the resultant graphene oxide product has a calculated interlayer spacing of about 12 and 6 layers, on average. Moreover, very large graphenic structures are obtained, generally over 20 micron (such as about 50 micron).

[0112] Various products prepared according to processes similar to those in Examples 1-5 are illustrated in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Average No. of GO layers Reaction scheme Reaction Time and layer spacing Batch reactor 8 hrs 5-11 layers, 11 .sup. (stirred tank) T-C reactor (batch) 30 min. 9 layers, 9 Semi-batch T-C reactor 30 min. 4 layers, 10 Continuous T-C reactor 1 min. 6 layers, 12

Example 6Batch Graphene: Semi-Continuous Toroidal Reactor

[0113] Using a process similar to described in Example 3, a semi-continuous/semi-batch toroidal reactor (e.g., wherein components are added to the reactor chamber and sealed, with an outlet leading to an inlet to allow a toroidal flow within the reactor), with the oxidizing agents omitted, is utilized to manufacture graphene from graphite.

Example 7Batch Graphene: Continuous Toroidal Reactor

[0114] Using a process similar to described in Example 4, a continuous/semi-batch toroidal reactor (e.g., wherein components are added to the reactor chamber and sealed, with an outlet leading to an inlet to allow a toroidal flow within the reactor), with the oxidizing agents omitted, is utilized to manufacture graphene from graphite.

Example 8Graphene Oxide Variation

[0115] A single graphite sample from a single source is divided into three portions and subjected to identical batch processing conditions described in Example 1. FTIR analysis of the resultant products are evaluated and illustrated in FIG. 16. As illustrated, significant variations in oxidation are observed, batch-to-batch.

[0116] Similarly, a single graphite sample from a single source is divided into three portions and subjected to an identical process using a vortex reactor, such as described in Example 3. FTIR analysis of the resultant products are evaluated and illustrated in FIG. 17. As illustrated, very little variations in oxidation is observed, batch-to-batch, with very good overlap of FTIR traces being observed between samples.

Example 9Flow Variation

[0117] Graphitic stock is provided to a reactor as described in the examples above is utilized. The flow type used in the reactor is varied by varying the rotational rates of the reactor walls. FIG. 19 illustrates the Couette (laminar) flow observed at slow rotational speeds (e.g., wherein Ta<Ta.sub.c). Further, as illustrated in FIG. 19, when Ta exceeds Tac, vortexes form, but when Ta is close to Tac, instabilities (vortexes) form near the reactor inlet, but as the flow continues toward the reactor exit, laminar flow resumes. This type of flow is illustrated as primary instabilities (PI). As Ta increases, instabilities form throughout the reactor, forming a Taylor vortex flow (TVF). Increasing the Ta/Ta.sub.c further, however, creates a secondary instability (SI), where a wavy flow is observed near the inlet of the reactor. Further increase of Ta/Ta.sub.c leads to a full wavy vortex flow (WVF).

[0118] FIG. 20 illustrates the results of injecting graphite into a reactor herein, with the various flow types illustrated in FIG. 19. As illustrated in FIG. 20, after just one minute, in a reactor having a (stable) laminar or Couette (shearing) flow is observed to have excellent conversion of graphite to graphenic compound (graphene oxide). By contrast the primary instability flow is observed to have good conversion to the graphenic compound, but some graphite remains. The stable vortex flow (Taylor vortex flow) is observed to provide excellent conversion of graphite to the graphenic compound, with no graphite component observed. By contrast, both flows having wavy morphologies and that use the most amount of energy produced good conversion of graphite to graphenic compound (graphene oxide), but had significant amounts of graphite also observed.

[0119] FIG. 21 illustrates the different interlayer spacing of the graphenic compounds prepared using the various types of flows described herein. As illustrated, Graphite has very low interlayer spacing, whereas all of the graphenic materials prepared according to a process described herein, using the various flow types described herein, produce graphenic compounds having an interlayer spacing of about 0.8 nm to about 1.1 nm (compared to less than 0.4 nm for graphite). Moreover, the graphenic compounds are observed to have fewer than 10 layers (e.g., 5 to about 10, such as about 8), as compared to about 84 (on average) for the graphite.

[0120] FIG. 22 illustrates the uniformity of the graphenic compounds produced according to the processes herein, particularly when using stable or Taylor vortex flows. As illustrated, the TV and SI flows produce graphenic materials with the greatest oxidation levels, whereas the wavy vortex flow produces the least oxidation, despite using the most energy. Moreover, the peak variation of the TV flow is extremely small (small error bars) compared that that of the other flows, including the SI flow, which also had high oxidation. FIG. 23 illustrates ID/IG and I2D/IG ratios, with the TVF demonstrating the smallest error bars, indicating the greatest uniformity of the graphenic compounds produced thereby.