Method for determining the maximum force to be transmitted to the driving wheels of a vehicle provided with a hybrid power train

Abstract

A method determines a force to be transmitted to driving wheels of a vehicle provided with a hybrid power train with several gear ratios and a traction battery. The method includes determining, over all of a speed range that the vehicle is capable of achieving, a maximum force that the power train is theoretically capable of transmitting to the wheels in predetermined nominal conditions of charge of the traction battery and/or of outside temperature and/or of atmospheric pressure; and determining, over all of the speed range, a drivability force that the power train is capable of transmitting to the wheels. The drivability force confirms that whatever the value of the speed of the vehicle, the drivability force is less than or equal to the maximum force; and the drivability force evolves within the speed range without exhibiting an inflexion point at values of the speed requiring a gear change.

Claims

1. A method for determining a force to be transmitted to driving wheels of a vehicle provided with a hybrid power train with several gear ratios and a traction battery, the method comprising: determining, over all of a speed range that the vehicle is capable of achieving, a maximum force that the power train is theoretically capable of transmitting to the wheels in predetermined nominal conditions of charge of the traction battery and/or of outside temperature and/or of atmospheric pressure; determining, over all of the speed range that the vehicle is capable of achieving, a drivability force that the power train is capable of transmitting to the wheels, said drivability force confirming that: whatever the value of the speed of the vehicle, the drivability force is less than or equal to the maximum force; and the drivability force evolves within the speed range without exhibiting an inflexion point at values of the speed requiring a gear change, wherein, in case of a request for maximum acceleration from the driver at a given speed, the method further comprises: computing a degradation coefficient, said coefficient being equal to a ratio between: a maximum force that the power train is really capable of transmitting to the wheels at the given speed at a current instant, given the real conditions of charge of the traction battery and/or of outside temperature and/or atmospheric pressure, and; the maximum force that the power train is theoretically capable of transmitting to the wheels at the given speed in the predetermined nominal conditions; and computing a corrected drivability force to be actually transmitted to the wheels, said corrected force being equal to the product of the degradation coefficient by the theoretical maximum force at the given speed, wherein the computing the degradation coefficient comprises: comparing the degradation constant to a previously stored degradation constant stored in a memory; and when the degradation constant is greater than or equal to the previously stored degradation constant, incrementing the previously stored degradation constant by an offset that is dependent upon the current instant.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the determining the maximum force includes determining an upper envelope of curves representing, for each of the gear ratios, a trend of the force transmitted to the wheels as a function of the speed of the vehicle.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the determining the drivability force includes determining an upwardly concave curve passing through at least one inflexion point of the upper envelope.

4. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a processing program that, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to execute the method as claimed in claim 1.

5. A hybrid vehicle, comprising: the non-transitory computer readable medium as claimed in claim 4.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description given in light of the attached FIGS. 1 to 7 which illustrate the following:

(2) FIG. 1 illustrates the maximum engine torque as a function of speed;

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates the maximum force on a vehicle as a function of speed:

(4) FIG. 3 illustrates the envelope of the maximum force on a vehicle as a function of speed;

(5) FIG. 4 illustrates a curve of maximum force achievable for drivability;

(6) FIG. 5 illustrates a curve of the current maximum force;

(7) FIG. 6 illustrates a method for determining a degradation coefficient; and

(8) FIG. 7 illustrates various vehicle limitations as a function of speed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(9) FIG. 1 illustrates, for a given power train, the trend of the maximum engine torque that the latter can produce in newton-meters (Nm) represented on the y axis, as a function of the engine speed in revolutions per minute (rpm), represented on the x axis. Such a maximum torque profile, increasing very rapidly then decreasing slowly, is characteristic of the maximum torque of a heat engine, and is so whatever the gear ratio selected. However, the issue remains the same when it is an electric power train or when it is a hybrid power train.

(10) If, as illustrated by FIG. 2 in the case of an HEV, the profile of FIG. 1 is transposed into a reference frame which illustrates the trend of the force transmitted to the vehicle in netwons (N), represented on the y axis, as a function of the speed of the vehicle in kilometers per hour (km/h), represented on the x axis, it can be seen that a hybrid power train, when it is associated with its transmission, is not capable of transmitting a constant force to the vehicle. FIG. 2 shows that that is true whatever the gear, which can vary from 1 to 6 in the example of this figure, each of the 6 gears corresponding to a curve in FIG. 2, even if the amplitude of variation of this force transmitted to the vehicle decreases very strongly from one gear to a higher gear. It should be noted that that is also true in the case of a thermal or electrical power train.

(11) Thus, in a so-called verve maneuver, which consists in accelerating and keeping the foot pressed to the floor on the accelerator pedal, the driver is in fact demanding the power train to supply its maximum torque from the first gear to the last, which amounts to applying to the vehicle the force curve illustrated by FIG. 3, called HYB max force, because it corresponds to a hybrid power train, which is obtained simply by plotting the upper envelope of the 6 curves corresponding to the 6 gears, like the curves of FIG. 2 for another power train. This curve is conventionally known to the central computer of any vehicle, in the form of a discretized mapping for example. It is found that this curve of force transmitted to the vehicle comprises numerous fairly abrupt inflection points, which are reflected in the form of discontinuities or jerks in the acceleration of the vehicle. It should be noted that these discontinuities or these jerks are perceived more by the driver if the vehicle has a transmission of DCT or IVT type, commonly used on HEVs.

(12) As illustrated in FIG. 4, to eliminate these discontinuities or these jerks, one of the principles of the invention is to define a curve of maximum force achievable for drivability, called drivability force in the figure, this curve being always slightly below the curve of theoretical force that the vehicle can provide, called theoretical max force in the figure. In the example of the figure, the drivability force curve is the upwardly concave parabolic curve, which is lower than the theoretical max force curve at all points, and which passes through numerous inflection points of the theoretical max force curve, at least one in all cases. By requiring the driver to be able to best follow this drivability force curve in case of a verve maneuver, the performance levels of the vehicle in terms of pure acceleration may indeed be reduced, but, equally, all the discontinuities or jerks are eliminated: the acceleration is smoothed over all the range of the gears. This curve can be determined and memorized by the central computer of the vehicle, in the form of a discretized mapping for example.

(13) This first principle according to the invention, namely using a drivability force curve for the maneuvers of verve, therefore offers the advantage of preventing the discontinuities or the jerks in the nominal cases of operation of the vehicle, that is to say when the battery is far from its minimum state of charge and when the temperature and pressure conditions are normal. However, in some case, it may be that a hybrid power train is not even capable of ensuring the maximum torque illustrated by the drivability force curve. For example in the case of a discharged or cold battery, the electric vehicle may not be capable of supplying the maximum electric torque necessary to follow the theoretical max force curve. Similarly, in very hot and/or low atmospheric pressure conditions, the heat engine may not be capable of supplying the maximum thermal torque necessary to follow the theoretical max force curve. In both cases, the performance levels of the power train can greatly decrease and, if nothing is done, the real limitation of the power train may become lower than the drivability limitation defined by the drivability force curve, as illustrated in FIG. 5 by a current max force curve. In this case, the use, in the creation of the will of the driver, of a drivability limitation according to the invention therefore becomes insufficient, because the curve of real limitation comprises numerous inflection points that are felt by the driver. To sum up, the initial problem has returned, even if it occurs less frequently given that the generation of the will of the driver uses a curve of drivability limitation according to the invention. This is why another principle of the invention is to detect any significant lowering of performance, as illustrated by the current max force curve and by a double-headed arrow in FIG. 5, in order to adapt the curve of drivability limitation to this lowering.

(14) From the current maximum force that can actually be transmitted to the vehicle and from the drivability force known through the drivability force curve, the invention proposes determining a coefficient representing the current value of the performance degradation relative to the drivability force. In this way, it is possible to adapt or correct in real time the curve of drivability limitation, in order to transmit a corrected force during a verve maneuver.

(15) Thus, a degradation coefficient Coef_degr can be computed as illustrated by FIG. 6. The first step is to compute, in a software block 71, the degradation coefficient by comparing the maximum force available at the current instant t, called Force_max_current, which is conventionally made available by the central computer of the vehicle, with the nominal drivability force, called Force_nom_driv, supplied by the curve of drivability limitation according to the invention and stored in the memory of the central computer. The block 71 supplies as output the degradation coefficient, which is memorized in a variable Coef_degr by a software block 72. Coef_degr lies between 0 and 1, where 0 represents the maximum degradation and 1 the absence of degradation. In a block 73, Coef_degr is then compared to the previously computed last value of the degradation coefficient, which is memorized in a variable Coef_degr_mem. It can be noted that, for the first iteration, Coef_degr_mem is initialized at 1, which is the nominal value of the degradation coefficient.

(16) If the coefficient Coef_degr is strictly lower than the last value previously computed and memorized in Coef_degr_mem (TRUE transition), then the new value stored in Coef_degr is memorized in Coef_degr_mem by a software block 74, the old value being lost.

(17) Otherwise, if the coefficient Coef_degr is greater than or equal to the last value previously computed and memorized in Coef_degr_mem (FALSE transition), then Coef_degr_mem is incremented by a software block 75 by an offset Inc dependent on the current instant t supplied by a software block 76, so as to go back up little by little to the nominal value of the degradation coefficient, namely 1.

(18) In the case of a performance degradation, the invention acts as illustrated by FIG. 7, which illustrates, on the one hand, a curve of nominal drivability limitation according to the invention, a curve of real current limitation with numerous force discontinuities, the trend of the degradation coefficient which results from the comparison of the two preceding curves according to the method illustrated by FIG. 6, and finally the curve of corrected drivability which results from the application of the degradation coefficient to the curve of nominal drivability limitation, according to the method illustrated by FIG. 6. It is indeed found that the corrected drivability limitation is modulated to be always located below what can actually be produced by the vehicle, that is to say below the curve of real current limitation. According to the invention, in a verve maneuver, the driver can have access only to the corrected drivability limitation and thus is no longer affected by the real current limitation, which includes force discontinuities. These force discontinuities are therefore not felt by the driver.

(19) In a particular embodiment, the driver could first of all choose an energy mode of the vehicle out of: auto hybrid: the energy management law would be free to choose the operation without constraint from the driver; forced ZEV: the driver could prioritize the use of running in pure electric mode, via battery discharge, because he or she is driving in a town for example; range saver: the driver could prioritize maintaining the battery charge via the increased use of the heat engine, for example because he or she knows that he or she will finish his or her journey in town and that he or she will then switch to forced ZEV mode. A curve of drivability limitation and therefore a drivability force could then be deduced as a function of the energy mode chosen.

(20) Another advantage of the present invention is that the torque limitation is transparent to the driver: there is very little chance that he or she will perceive it from one verve maneuver to another. Finally, the invention makes it possible to always maintain the level of charge of the battery at an acceptable level, such that the system is never destabilized (particularly by maintaining the state of charge of the traction battery within an operational range), and even if the driver strings together verve maneuvers.