Use of poultry crude protein extract for preparing anti-fatigue composition

11052058 ยท 2021-07-06

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A use of a poultry crude protein extract for preparing an anti-fatigue composition is provided. The poultry crude protein extract is obtained by extraction of poultry meat at high temperature and high pressure and the removal of fat by oil and water separation, and the poultry crude protein extract includes at least branched-chain amino acid (BCAA), histidine, threonine, lysine, and phenylalanine, wherein anti-fatigue entails increasing muscle glycogen concentration, helping to increase exercise tolerance, helping to increase blood urea nitrogen metabolism, and helping to inhibit lactic acid production.

Claims

1. A method for improving fatigue tolerance of a user, comprising: feeding a poultry crude protein for improving fatigue factors of the user, wherein a total molar ratio of amino acids of the poultry crude protein extract is 100, the poultry crude protein extract comprises the following amino acids in molar ratio: 17.5-20.5% leucine, 8.0-9.5% isoleucine, 13.0-14.5% valine, 6.5-8.5% histidine, 12.0-13.5% threonine, 20.5-22.5% lysine, 8.0-11.5% phenylalanine, 1.5-3.0% tyrosine and 4.5-5.5% methionine.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein an effective dose of the poultry crude protein extract is at least 20 mL per day.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: increasing a muscle glycogen concentration.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: increasing an exercise tolerance.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: increasing a blood urea nitrogen metabolism.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: inhibiting a lactic acid production.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the poultry crude protein extract is obtained by an extraction of a poultry meat at a high temperature of 85 C. to 105 C. and a high pressure for 9 hours to 11 hours with a subsequent removal of a fat by an oil and water separation.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein a source of the poultry meat is chicken, duck, goose, or pigeon.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: accelerating a protein metabolism ability.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: decreasing a lactate increase rate.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving fatigue tolerance of the user comprises: increasing an antioxidant enzymes activity.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(1) When fatigue occurs, the reaction is slow and precision operation cannot be performed, which increases operational errors and dangers. When the human body undergoes hypoxia or intense exercise, the blood glucose concentration is increased by the conversion of glycogen into glucose. Anti-fatigue effects may be achieved by providing sufficient energy to muscle tissue through glycolysis, reducing the production of lactic acid in the human body after anaerobic exercise, removing lactic acid in time, or increasing the antioxidants in the body.

(2) The invention provides a use of a poultry crude protein extract for preparing an anti-fatigue composition. In the invention, to evaluate the effect of the poultry crude protein extract on fatigue resistance, the specifications of Anti-fatigue function evaluation method for healthy foods issued by the Health and Welfare Department were referenced, and an experiment was carried out with 9-week-old Sprague-Dawley (SD)-strain male rats, with 8 rats in each group that were respectively the control group, Low-dose group, medium-dose group, and high-dose group. After 8 weeks of feeding the poultry crude protein extract of the invention, an evaluation of physical fitness challenge and fatigue elimination indices was performed.

(3) Definitions

(4) The poultry crude protein extract described by the specification includes crude protein extracts of poultry such as chickens, ducks, geese, and pigeons.

(5) The anti-fatigue described in the specification refers to an increase in muscle glycogen concentration, an increase in exercise tolerance, an increase in blood urea nitrogen metabolism, and an inhibition of lactic acid production.

(6) As the values used in the specification are approximate, all experimental data are expressed in the range of 20%, preferably in the range of 10%, and most preferably in the range of 5%.

(7) Statistical Analysis

(8) According to the general biostatistical method analysis, the SPSS statistical software was integrated and expressed as meanstandard deviation (S.D.) The test data compared the recovery evaluation of the fatigue challenge after the intervention of the test substance using the Duncan's Multiple Range Test of one-way ANOVA in the statistical software. The statistical results are expressed in English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05). After the intervention of the test substance and after the appropriate fatigue challenge, the recovery evaluation index has at least two types of indices to achieve statistically significant improvement (p<0.05), and it may be determined that the test substance should have anti-fatigue function.

Example 1 Method for Preparing Poultry Crude Protein Extract of the Invention

(9) In the invention, 15-week old white Muscovy duck test No. 1 was used, which after being slaughtered, was placed in an environment at a temperature of 2 C. to 7 C. for acceptance and raw material treatment. Duck meat that was normal in color without exudate on the surface and odor that was elastic was placed in a pressure cooker, and then concentrated and extracted at a set temperature of 95 C. under reduced pressure for 10 hours, and then was subjected to oil and water separation and hot filling at 85 C., and lastly sterilized at 121 C. for 15 minutes to obtain the poultry crude protein extract of the invention.

Example 2 Ingredient Analysis of Poultry Crude Protein Extract of the Invention

(10) In the invention, an ingredient analysis was further performed on the duck crude protein extract prepared in Example 1 and the chicken crude protein extract prepared by the same method, and the results are shown in Table 1 and Table 2, which include amino acid and protein, and have higher content of amino acids such as lysine, histidine, lysine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, and lysine, especially leucine, which is an amino acid necessary for the human body.

(11) Since these amino acids cannot be synthesized by the liver, they must be obtained by additional intake; they may reduce the feeling of fatigue, and for those who perform physical exercise, leucine is a precursor of -ketoisocaproate (KIC) and -hydroxy--methylbutyrate (HMB), which may improve exercise capacity and accelerate the recovery of muscle fatigue. Furthermore, it was further confirmed in the nutrient analysis that the poultry crude protein extract of the invention contained no trans-fat and had a very low content of saturated fat, which is beneficial to human health.

(12) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Analysis of amino acids in duck crude protein extract and chicken crude protein extract (mg/100 g) Amino Histidine Threonine Tyrosine Valine Methionine Phenylalanine Isoleucine Leucine Lysine acid His Thr Tyr Val Met Phe Ile Leu Lys Duck crude 75.4 111.7 37.2 115.0 54.8 101.7 79.7 193.0 232.6 protein extract Chicken 91.3 105.1 22.7 119.2 51.9 132.3 83.6 166.2 219.2 crude protein extract

(13) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Analysis of nutrients of duck histone extract and chicken histone extract Water Ash Saturated Trans Total Nutrition content content Fat Protein fat fat Carbohydrate Sugar Sodium calories label (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (mg/100 g) (K cal/100 g) Duck 92.6 0.7 0.2 7.2 0.08 0.00 0 0.0 98.6 30.6 crude protein extract Chicken 92.7 0.8 0.1 6.7 0.06 0.00 0 0.0 89.0 27.7 crude protein extract

Example 3 Anti-Fatigue Evaluation of Poultry Crude Protein Extract of the Invention

(14) In the invention, to evaluate the effects of poultry crude protein extract on anti-fatigue function, the specifications of the Evaluation Method of Anti-Fatigue Function for Healthy Foods issued by the of Health and Welfare Department were referenced, and an experiment was performed with 9-week-old SD-strain male rats (purchased from Lesco Biotech Co., Ltd.) There were 8 rats in each group, which were respectively the control group, low-dose group, medium-dose group, and high-dose group. The low-, medium-, and high doses of the poultry crude protein extract of the invention administered were respectively 0.58, 1.17, 2.92 g/kg BW (body weight), and the control group was given reverse osmosis water (oral dose of rats was calculated according to the daily intake of adults, as shown in Table 3).

(15) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Feeding dose of each group of poultry crude protein extract of the invention Relative human Number Tube feeding Dose.sup.a dose.sup.b of Animal group substance (g/kg) (g/60 kg) animals Control group Reverse osmosis 8 water Low-dose group Poultry crude 20.7 5.66 8 protein extract Medium-dose Poultry crude 41.3 11.31 8 group protein extract High dose-group Poultry crude 103.5 28.28 8 protein extract .sup.aDose conversion: The dose of oral administration of rats was based on the daily intake of adults, and then conversion was performed according to the metabolic coefficient (6.2) of the rats relative to the human body and the daily oral dose of the rats was calculated. Taking 1 g per person per day as an example, the rat dose was 0.103 g/kg (1 g/60 kg 6.2 = 0.103 g/kg). .sup.bThe poultry crude protein extract of the invention was fed for 8 weeks. The specification was 65 mL/bottle and the freeze-dry ratio was 8.7%, and therefore the freeze-dried weight was 5.66 g/bottle.

(16) After 8 weeks of feeding the poultry crude protein extract of the invention, an evaluation of physical fitness challenge and fatigue elimination indices was performed. The physical challenge was a swimming exhaustion test, and a fatigue evaluation was performed after the test. The evaluation of physiological stress recovery included metabolic stress indices: increased lactate rate, decreased lactate rate, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) content. Muscle damage index: creatinine, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK), and myoglobin. Liver damage index: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity. Oxidative damage index: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity.

(17) Before the start of the test, the rats were quarantined and adapted for one week, making the rats used to and familiar with the new environment. On the first day of the test, the poultry crude protein extract of the invention was administered daily until the 56th day; on the 49th day, swimming training was performed to facilitate the swimming test afterwards; on the 52nd day, a swimming exhaustion test was performed with a load of 3% of the bodyweight; on the 53rd day, after a 90-minute swimming test was performed, the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) value was measured; on the 55th day, after an oil test was performed for 10 minutes, the serum lactate value was measured before swimming, after swimming, and after 20 minutes of rest; on the 56th day, a physiological and biochemical analysis was performed after animal sacrifice and blood collection were performed.

(18) 3.1 Determination of Bodyweight and Food Intake

(19) The test animals were measured for bodyweight and food intake once a week before and during the test; and the measurement was performed once a week during the test. The measurement method was to add a quantitative feed on the day of the weight measurement, and the remaining feed amount was calculated one week later. As shown in Tables 4 and 5, the test results show that the average bodyweight and food intake of low-, medium-, and high doses in the first to eighth weeks of the test are not significantly different from those in the control group (p>0.05).

(20) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Changes in average bodyweight of rats in each group during the test period Weight (g) Feeding Low-dose group Medium-dose group High-dose group week Control group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) Before 349.9 8.0.sup.a 354.6 9.2.sup.a 352.6 11.3.sup.a 353.6 11.0.sup.a test First 397.9 9.1.sup.a 402.0 13.7.sup.a 394.6 10.8.sup.a 406.0 13.4.sup.a week Second 432.4 10.6.sup.a 434.5 18.5.sup.a 424.3 16.1.sup.a 440.1 13.8.sup.a week Third 467.0 9.0.sup.a 458.3 13.3.sup.a 453.0 17.2.sup.a 468.8 17.2.sup.a week Fourth 491.2 12.4.sup.a 488.7 22.4.sup.a 481.0 17.0.sup.a 495.1 20.3.sup.a week Fifth 515.1 13.3.sup.a 516.8 27.0.sup.a 517.8 27.2.sup.a 520.4 23.2.sup.a week Sixth 534.0 19.4.sup.a 542.3 28.8.sup.a 538.4 25.0.sup.a 542.8 23.0.sup.a week Seventh 562.7 20.0.sup.a 569.5 25.7.sup.a 566.3 24.1.sup.a 567.4 22.5.sup.a week Eighth 575.6 20.9.sup.a 580.2 21.9.sup.a 576.3 18.2.sup.a 579.4 14.0.sup.a week
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by fmultiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).

(21) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Changes in average food intake of rats in each group during the test period Food intake (g/day/rat) Low-dose Medium-dose High-dose Feeding group group group week Control group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) First 27.6 1.7.sup.a 27.5 1.6.sup.a 27.2 2.6.sup.a 27.1 2.0.sup.a week Second 29.7 0.7.sup.a 30.7 1.7.sup.a 29.5 1.2.sup.a 29.6 2.5.sup.a week Third 28.1 1.1.sup.a 28.2 2.0.sup.a 27.3 1.7.sup.a 27.7 1.6.sup.a week Fourth 28.1 1.6.sup.a 27.7 2.1.sup.a 27.5 1.3.sup.a 27.1 1.8.sup.a week Fifth 27.7 0.9.sup.a 27.2 1.6.sup.a 27.1 1.1.sup.a 26.9 2.0.sup.a week Sixth 28.0 1.5.sup.a 27.3 1.6.sup.a 27.3 1.2.sup.a 27.0 2.1.sup.a week Seventh 27.9 2.0.sup.a 27.5 1.9.sup.a 27.5 0.7.sup.a 26.9 2.1.sup.a week Eighth 26.6 1.0.sup.a 27.4 1.9.sup.a 27.7 0.9.sup.a 26.5 1.9.sup.a week
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).
3.2 Determination of Liver and Kidney Weight

(22) At the end of rats sacrifice in the test, the livers and kidneys of the rats in each group were weighed and statistically analyzed. The results of the test period are shown in Table 6. There is no significant difference in the weight of liver and kidney between the rats of each group and the control group (p>0.05).

(23) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Average weight of liver and kidney of rats in each group Low-dose Medium-dose High-dose Control group group group Item group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) Liver weight 20.6 3.6.sup.a 21.9 2.5.sup.a 21.0 1.8.sup.a 21.6 2.5.sup.a (g) Kidney 3.9 0.4.sup.a 4.1 0.2.sup.a 3.8 0.4.sup.a 4.0 0.5.sup.a weight (g)
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).
3.3 Swimming Exhaustion Test

(24) One week before the experiment, after 30 minutes of feeding, swimming training was first performed. After fasting for 12 hours before the test, the rats were placed in a plastic bucket with a diameter of 45 cm, a water depth of 50 cm, and a water temperature of 271 C. for weight-bearing swimming. The weight-bearing ratio was 3% of the bodyweight, forcing the rats to struggle during the swim until physical exhaustion and sinking, then the time from when the rats were in the water to when their nostrils sank into the water for 10 seconds was used as the swimming time.

(25) The results of swimming exhaustion time of rats in each group are shown in Table 7. After low-, medium-, and high doses of the poultry crude protein extract of the invention were fed, the swimming times of the rats were respectively increased compared to the control group from 442.3 seconds to 598.8 seconds, 571.3 seconds, and 585.6 seconds. It is observed that the swimming time of the animals after being fed the poultry crude protein extract of the invention is increased significantly (p<0.05), but there is no significant difference between the doses (p>0.05).

(26) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Time of swimming exhaustion for rats in each group Medium-dose Low-dose group group High-dose group Item Control group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) Swimming 442.3 70.2.sup.a 598.8 145.1.sup.b 571.3 90.0.sup.b 585.6 116.4.sup.b exhaustion time (sec)
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).
3.4 Lactic Acid Biochemical Analysis Measurement

(27) After a 10-minute swimming test, the serum lactate value was measured before swimming, after swimming, and after 20 minutes of rest, and serum was obtained and lactic acid content was measured with a serum biochemical analyzer (7070 Autoanalyzer, Hitachi). Regarding the change of lactic acid content after the swimming exhaustion test, it may be observed from the results of Table 8 that the rate of increase in lactic acid of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups is significantly reduced compared with the control group, showing a significant difference (p<0.05); however, there is no significant difference in the rate of decrease in lactic acid in each dose group compared with the control group (p>0.05). In addition, there is no significant difference in the rate of increase in lactic acid and the rate of decrease in lactic acid between the doses (p>0.05).

(28) 3.5 Blood Urea Nitrogen Biochemical Analysis Measurement

(29) After a 90-minute swimming test, blood urea nitrogen content (BUN) was measured. Serum was obtained and blood urea nitrogen content was measured by a serum biochemical analyzer (7070 Autoanalyzer, Hitachi). The analysis results of blood urea nitrogen content are shown in Table 8. It may be found that after feeding the poultry crude protein extract of the invention, the blood urea nitrogen value of each dose group is significantly lower than that of the control group (p<0.05), but there is no significant difference between the doses (p>0.05).

(30) 3.6 Liver and Muscle Tissue Liver Analysis

(31) 30 minutes after the current feeding, the animals were sacrificed, the liver and calf gastrocnemius muscles were taken, the glycogen was decomposed into glucose, and the glycogen was measured by a commercially available kit of onion ketone reagent. The analysis results of liver and muscle glycogen concentration are shown in Table 8. The liver glycogen concentration results show that there is no significant difference between the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups and the control group (p>0.05). The results of muscle glycogen concentration show that the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups show a significant increase compared with the control group (p<0.05), but there is no significant difference between the doses (p>0.05).

(32) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Blood urea nitrogen, rate of increase in lactic acid and decrease in lactic acid, liver and muscle glycogen analysis results of rats in each group Low-dose Medium-dose High-dose group group group Item Control group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) BUN (mg/dL) 24.0 7.6.sup.b 18.7 1.4.sup.a 19.7 1.2.sup.a 19.5 1.4.sup.a Increased lactate rate (%) 116.2 51.9.sup.b 67.1 40.9.sup.a 66.1 33.6.sup.a 57.8 27.9.sup.a Decreased lactate rate (%) 40.0 13.8.sup.a 54.8 13.7.sup.a 53.8 15.4.sup.a 53.6 10.6.sup.a Glycogen (mg/g liver 20.4 6.4.sup.a 21.6 5.1.sup.a 19.5 2.8.sup.a 16.6 4.8.sup.a tissue) Glycogen (mg/g muscle 0.82 0.30.sup.a 1.72 0.58.sup.b 1.88 0.42.sup.b 1.64 0.60.sup.b tissue)
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).
3.7 Factor Analysis of Oxidative Damage Index in Liver and Muscle Tissue

(33) In the invention, the degree of oxidative damage in liver and muscle tissue was measured via thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity.

(34) The thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reactive substances were based on the lipid peroxidation test of Tarladgis et al., in which 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxy-propane (TMP) was used as the standard, and TMP was diluted to 1 mM with double distilled water first, and then the concentration thereof was respectively diluted to 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 M with 1 N H.sub.2SO.sub.4 solution, and 100 L of each was analyzed. The analysis method was the same as the sample. 100 L of tissue extract was added to 600 L of 5% trichloroacetic acid and 200 L of 60 mmol/L TBA, and after reacting at 80 C. for 90 minutes, the tissue extract was cooled to room temperature, and after centrifugation (12,000g, 15 min, 4 C.), the supernatant was removed for analysis of malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration. After MDA and thiobarbituric acid solution were heated for a period of time in an acidic environment, a pink substance was produced, and the absorbance at a wavelength of 540 nm was measured to estimate the degree of lipid peroxidation of the sample. Thiobarbituric acid is a product from the analysis of the lipid peroxidation effect and is generally expressed in terms of MDA production, and the measurement unit is expressed in M/g protein.

(35) The principle of catalase measurement is that catalase may catalyze the decomposition of H.sub.2O.sub.2 into H.sub.2O and O.sub.2 and decrease the absorbance of H.sub.2O.sub.2 with time. Since the reaction amount is proportional to the decrease rate of absorption value, the rate of decomposition of H.sub.2O.sub.2 is used to quantify catalase activity. The activity of catalase is expressed in U/g protein. H.sub.2O.sub.2 was diluted with phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 0.05 M NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4, and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4), and a test was performed with an absorbance thereof between about 1.2 and 1.3 to prepare catalase (20, 40, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 unti/mL/protein), and after 900 L H.sub.2O.sub.2 dilution was uniformly mixed with 100 L of the sample, the amount of change in the absorbance at a wavelength of 230 nm in 3 minutes was measured by a spectrophotometer for quantitative analysis.

(36) The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was analyzed according to the SOD activity test reagent Ransod (RANDOX Lab Ltd., UK). The SOD activity is defined as the inhibition of 2-(4-iodo-phenyl)-3-(4-nitro-phenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride, wherein the amount of enzyme required to reduce the reaction rate by 50% is one unit (U), and the measurement unit is expressed as U/mg protein.

(37) The glutathione peroxidase (GPx) measurement was based on GPx activity test reagent Ransel (RANDOX Lab Ltd., UK). GPx activity is defined as one unit (U) of the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 mole of NADPH per minute, and the GPx activity of the tissue is expressed as U/mg protein.

(38) The oxidative damage index of liver of rats in each group is as shown in Table 9. The GPx activity of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups is significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.05); the SOD activity of the low-dose group is not significantly different from that of the control group (p>0.05), and the SOD activity is significantly increased in the middle- and high-dose groups compared with the control group (p<0.05); the catalase activity of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups is higher than that of the control group (p<0.05), and there is no significant difference between the doses (p>0.05); the content of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) of each dose group is significantly lower than that of the control group (p<0.05), and there is no difference between groups (p>0.05).

(39) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Analysis results of oxidative damage index of liver tissue of rats in each group Medium-dose Low-dose group group High-dose group Item Control group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) GPx (U/g protein) 452.8 47.4.sup.a 533.2 71.5.sup.b 552.0 63.5.sup.bc 603.5 74.7.sup.c SOD (U/mg protein) 22.4 7.3.sup.a 20.4 5.9.sup.a 30.1 5.1.sup.b 30.5 9.3.sup.b Catalase (U/g 1,598.2 324.3.sup.a 2,116.3 537.9.sup.b 2,289.2 671.2.sup.b 3,129 381.0.sup.c protein) TBARS (M/g 0.50 0.12.sup.b 0.39 0.07.sup.a 0.39 0.05.sup.a 0.33 0.03.sup.a protein)
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).

(40) The oxidative damage index of muscle of rats in each group is shown in Table 10. The GPx activity of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups is significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.05); the SOD activity of the middle and high-dose groups is higher than that of the control group (p<0.05); the catalase activity of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups is significantly increased compared with the control group (p<0.05); the GPx, SOD, and catalase activity are not different between each dose group (p>0.05); and each dose group of TBARS is significantly decreased (p<0.05) compared with the control group.

(41) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Analysis results of oxidative damage index of muscle tissue of rats in each group Medium- Low-dose dose High-dose Control group group group Item group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) GPx 26.3 5.7.sup.a 44.1 10.9.sup.b 48.4 7.7.sup.b 44.5 12.7.sup.b (U/g protein) SOD (U/mg 4.2 1.5.sup.a 5.6 1.3.sup.ab 6.7 1.1.sup.b 7.0 1.7.sup.b protein) Catalase 43.4 12.7.sup.a 71.8 12.6.sup.b 80.9 37.6.sup.b 97.3 31.4.sup.b (U/g protein) TBARS 1.90 0.40.sup.c 1.56 0.29.sup.b 1.45 0.20.sup.ab 1.22 0.31.sup.a (M/ g protein)
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).
3.8 Serum Biochemical Analysis

(42) At the end of the event, all test rats were sacrificed for blood sampling by inhaling carbon dioxide. After centrifugation under the conditions of 4 C. and 3,000g for 15 minutes, serum was obtained and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine in the serum samples were measured with a serum biochemical analyzer (7070 Autoanalyzer, Hitachi) and related reagents.

(43) The results of serum biochemical tests of the rats in each group are shown in Table 11. There are no significant differences in the values of liver damage indices (AST, ALT) between the groups (p>0.05). There are three types of muscle damage indices (CPK, creatinine, myoglobin), and the values of CPK and creatinine concentrations of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups are not significantly different from those of the control group (p>0.05). The myoglobin concentration of each dose is significantly increased compared with the control group (p>0.05). There is no significant difference in blood glucose values between the groups (p>0.05).

(44) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Serum biochemical analysis results of rats in each group Medium-dose Low-dose group group High-dose group Item Control group (0.58 g/kg) (1.17 g/kg) (2.92 g/kg) AST (U/L) 116.8 17.8.sup.a 116.5 12.6.sup.a 112.5 17.0.sup.a 117.5 26.8.sup.a ALT (U/L) 52.9 6.5.sup.a 57.0 10.8.sup.a 60.4 8.5.sup.a 54.3 9.1.sup.a Creatinine 0.45 0.05.sup.a 0.46 0.07.sup.a 0.43 0.05.sup.a 0.45 0.05.sup.a (mg/dL) CPK (U/L) 150.1 25.4.sup.a 163.3 37.6.sup.a 165.8 60.1.sup.a 156.0 49.6.sup.a Myoglobin 2.4 1.5.sup.a 4.2 2.0.sup.b 4.5 1.5.sup.b 4.8 1.4.sup.b (U/L) Glucose (mg/dL) 145.1 20.2.sup.a 140.4 25.6.sup.a 153.3 26.3.sup.a 132.8 30.0.sup.a
All data are expressed as meanS.D., n=8. The difference between the groups was compared by Duncan's multiple range test of One-Way ANOVA, and the statistical results are represented by English letters. The same letter indicates that there is no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05), and different letters indicate statistical difference between the groups (p<0.05).

(45) Based on the above, the average bodyweight, average food intake, and liver and kidney weight of rats of each dose group were compared with the control group; the results show that feeding the poultry crude protein extract of the invention had no adverse reaction effects on physiological metabolism. After feeding the low-, medium-, and high doses of the poultry crude protein extract of the invention, the swimming time of the rats compared with the control group is respectively increased from 442.3 seconds to 598.8 seconds, 517.3 seconds, and 585.6 seconds, that is, the increase in swimming time indicates an effect of increased basic physical strength of the rats. In the blood urea nitrogen analysis results, the blood urea nitrogen value of each dose group is significantly lower than the control group, indicating that from the low-dose group, the ability to accelerate protein metabolism is observed, and blood urea nitrogen content is reduced. The change in lactic acid content after the swimming exhaustion test shows that the lactic acid content is increased due to fatigue after the swimming test, and is gradually decreased after rest due to lactic acid metabolism. The results of lactic acid analysis in plasma show that when the rats of each dose group were given the poultry crude protein extract, after the exercise test, the forming of lactic acid was inhibited, and the accumulation of lactic acid was slowed down. The analysis results of muscle glycogen concentration show that each dose group show a significant increase compared with the control group. That is, the muscle glycogen concentration may be increased to improve anti-fatigue effect. The analysis results of serum biochemical indices show that there are no significant differences in the values of liver damage indices (AST, ALT) between the groups; there are no significant differences in the values of muscle damage (CPK, creatinine), indicating that feeding the poultry crude protein extract of the invention had no adverse effects on the safety of the rats. The liver and muscle CPx and catalase activity of each dose group are significantly higher than those of the control group, indicating that after feeding the poultry crude protein extract of the invention, the activity of antioxidant enzymes was enhanced to form a protective effect. In terms of oxidative damage index, TBARS is one of the lipid peroxidation lipid indices. Therefore, after vigorous exercise, the lipid peroxide is increased significantly. The results show that the poultry crude protein extract of the invention may significantly reduce the TBARS values of the liver and muscle, and the dose groups showed significant difference in the alleviation of the lipid peroxidation phenomenon of the liver and muscle. Therefore, the poultry crude protein extract of the invention has the effects of increasing muscle glycogen concentration, helping to increase exercise tolerance, helping to increase blood urea nitrogen metabolism, and helping to inhibit lactic acid production.