Loudspeaker structure

Abstract

A loudspeaker having: a magnetic unit, a voice coil axially movable in the air gap of the magnetic unit, a basket fixed to the magnetic unit, a membrane fixed to the cylindrical support of the voice coil and connected to the basket, and a vibrating element fixed to said membrane by means of a rim. The vibrating element has a base fixed to the membrane, a shank that projects from the base and a mass that projects from the shank in cantilever mode.

Claims

1. A loudspeaker comprising: a magnetic unit having an air gap therein; a voice coil mounted on a cylindrical support and disposed so as to move axially in the air gap of said magnetic unit; a basket fixed to said magnetic unit; a membrane fixed to the cylindrical support of said voice coil and connected to said basket; a rim connecting a peripheral part of said membrane to said basket; and at least one vibrating element configured to control vibrating modes of said membrane, said at least one vibrating element being fixed to said membrane, said at least one vibrating element comprising: a base fixed to said membrane; a shank that projects from said base; and a mass that projects from said shank in a cantilever and manner, wherein said mass is of a rigid non-deformable material, said mass being free to oscillate in any direction, wherein said at least one vibrating element is made of an injection molded plastic material.

2. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said at least one vibrating element is made formed of a single piece of plastic material.

3. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said mass is of a hard plastic material.

4. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said at least one vibrating element is disposed in an area of a surface of said membrane with a highest displacement value at a set frequency in relation to vibration modes of said membrane.

5. The loudspeaker of claim 4, wherein said at least one vibrating element is disposed in a central portion of said membrane.

6. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said mass of said at least one vibrating element has a discoidal shape.

7. The loudspeaker of claim 6, wherein said shank of said at least one vibrating element has a cylindrical shape and is disposed in an axial position with respect to said mass.

8. The loudspeaker of claim 6, wherein said base of said at least one vibrating element has a discoidal shape with a diameter less than a diameter of said mass.

9. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said mass of said at least one vibrating element has a diameter less than 1/10 of a diameter of said membrane.

10. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said at least one vibrating element has a weight less than 5% of a weight of said membrane and of said rim.

11. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said at least one vibrating element is disposed above said membrane such that said mass faces toward an exterior of the loudspeaker.

12. The loudspeaker of claim 1, wherein said at least one vibrating element is disposed under said membrane with said mass facing toward said magnetic unit.

13. The loudspeaker of claim 1, said at least one vibrating element comprising; a first vibrating element disposed above said membrane; and a second vibrating element disposed under said membrane.

Description

(1) Additional features of the invention will appear evident from the detailed description below, which refers to merely illustrative, not limiting embodiments, wherein:

(2) FIG. 1 is an axial sectional view of a first embodiment of a loudspeaker structure according to the invention;

(3) FIG. 2 is a chart that shows the sound pressure level (SPL) according to the frequency in a FEA (Finite Element Analysis) simulation performed on a loudspeaker without vibrating element, wherein a virtual microphone is disposed along the axis of the loudspeaker, at a distance of 1 meter from the loudspeaker;

(4) FIG. 3 is a chart like FIG. 2, which also shows the results of a FEA simulation performed on a loudspeaker with vibrating element according to the invention;

(5) FIGS. 4 and 5 are two diagrammatic drawings that show FEA simulations of the deformation of the membrane at a frequency of approximately 13 kHz in a loudspeaker without vibrating element and in a loudspeaker with vibrating element;

(6) FIGS. 6 and 7 are two diagrammatic drawings, which show FEA visual simulations of the SPL at a frequency of 15 kHz in a loudspeaker without vibrating element and in a loudspeaker with vibrating element;

(7) FIG. 8 is a chart that shows the SPL according to the frequency in experimental tests performed on a loudspeaker without vibrating element and in a loudspeaker with vibrating element, with a microphone disposed along the axis of the loudspeaker at a distance of 1 meter from the loudspeaker.

(8) FIGS. 9 and 10 are the same charts as FIG. 8, except for the fact that they show experimental tests performed with a microphone disposed on an axis inclined by 15 relative to the axis of the loudspeaker and on an axis inclined by 30 relative to the axis of the loudspeaker at a distance of 1 meter from the loudspeaker;

(9) FIGS. 11 and 12 are the same views as FIG. 1, which show variants of the loudspeaker according to the invention;

(10) FIGS. 13 and 14 are two perspective views that show two variants of the vibrating element.

(11) With reference to the Figures, the loudspeaker of the invention is disclosed, which is generally indicated with reference numeral (100).

(12) With reference to FIG. 1, a loudspeaker (100) comprises a magnetic assembly (M) wherein an air gap (T) is generated.

(13) A voice coil (1) is mounted on a cylindrical support (10) and is disposed with possibility of axial movement in the air gap (T) of the magnetic assembly. The voice coil (1) shown in the drawing has only one winding, but can have multiple windings. A basket (2) is fixed to the magnetic assembly (M).

(14) A centering device (3) is fixed to the basket (2) and to the cylindrical support (10) of the voice coil, in such way as to maintain the voice coil (1) in the air gap (T) of the magnetic assembly. The centering device (3) comprises at least one elastic suspension. The centering device (3) is optional and may not be provided, for example in tweeter loudspeakers.

(15) A membrane (4) is fixed to the cylindrical support (10) of the voice coil. The membrane (4) is of flat type, but it could also be a non-flat membrane, for example with a cone or dome shape. The flat membrane may have a honeycomb structure disposed between two layers of paper, or it may be made of carbon fiber, Kevlar fiber (a para-amid based substance), aluminum or Nomex (a meta-aramid substance). The membrane (4) is deformable and has a density of 170 Kg/m.sup.3.

(16) The membrane (4) is fixed to a rim of the cylindrical support (10), in a distal position relative to the voice coil (1), by means of welding or gluing (11). For illustrative purposes, the membrane (4) has a circular shape with a diameter that is almost double than the diameter of the cylindrical support (10).

(17) A rim (5) is connected to the basket (2) and to a peripheral part of the membrane (4). The rim (5) comprises an elastic suspension.

(18) When the voice coil (1), which is immersed in a radial magnetic field, is crossed by the electrical current, according to the Lorentz law, a force is generated, which causes the axial displacement of the cylindrical support (10) of the voice coil, causing the movement and the vibration of the membrane (4) that generates a sound. Therefore the loudspeaker (100) produces the sound by means of the displacement of the membrane (4).

(19) For illustrative purposes, the magnetic unit (M) may comprise a lower polar plate (6) with cup shape, having a base (60) and a lateral wall (61). A magnet (7) is disposed on the base (60) of the lower polar plate and an upper polar plate (8) is disposed on the magnet. In view of the above, the air gap (T) is defined as a toroidal air gap between the lateral surface of the upper polar plate (8) and the lateral surface (61) of the lower polar plate.

(20) Although this type of magnetic unit is shown in the Figures, evidently, an equivalent magnetic unit can be used, such as a magnetic unit provided with a polar plate with a central core (T-Joke) and a toroidal magnet disposed around the core of the polar plate. Moreover, a magnetic unit with multiple air gaps with multi-winding coil can be used.

(21) According to the invention, at least one vibrating element (9) is disposed in the membrane (4). Advantageously, the at least one vibrating element (9) is disposed in an area of the surface of the membrane (4) with the highest displacement value at a set frequency, in relation to the vibration modes of the membrane.

(22) In the example of FIG. 1, the vibrating element (9) is disposed in a central part of the membrane (4).

(23) The vibrating element (9) comprises a base (90), a shank (91) that projects from the base and a mass (92) that projects from the shank (91) in cantilever mode.

(24) The base (90) is used for fixing to the membrane (4). The base minimally affects the frequency response of the membrane. Therefore the base (90) must be as small as possible in order not to increase the total weight of the membrane. The base (20) may be shaped as a disc-like plate.

(25) The function of the shank (91) is to support the mass (92) in cantilever mode. However, the length of the shank (91) affects the frequency response of the membrane because it displaces the center of gravity of the mass (92). Therefore, the length of the shank (91) is selected according to the frequency response to be obtained, i.e. according to the vibrations of the membrane (4) to be controlled.

(26) The mass (92) affects the frequency response of the membrane, not according to its weight, but according to the projection from the shank (91). Therefore, the dimensions of the mass are chosen according to the frequency response to be obtained.

(27) The mass (92) is a rigid, non-deformable element in order not to generate additional vibrations.

(28) The mass (92) must be free to oscillate in all directions. In fact, the mass (92) is activated by a vertical movement of the membrane (4), but its dissipation function is performed with a horizontal (oscillation) movement.

(29) The mass (92) is made of a different material from the membrane and has a higher specific weight than the membrane (4). Advantageously, the mass (92) is made of hard plastic, for example ABS, and has a density of 900 Kg/m.sup.3.

(30) Advantageously, the mass (92) has a disc-like shape with the smallest thickness possible in order not to increase its weight. The thickness of the mass (92) can be approximately 0.5-1.5 mm.

(31) The diameter or maximum width of the mass (92) is approximately 1/12- of the diameter of the membrane (4).

(32) The vibrating element (9) can be made of plastic material in one piece, for example by injection molding.

(33) The shank (91) is disposed in a central position relative to the base (90) and to the mass (91). In such a case, the vibrating element (9) has a substantially H-shaped cross-section. The mass (92) has a higher diameter than the base (90).

(34) Following are some comparative examples of a traditional loudspeaker with a honeycomb flat membrane disposed between two layers of paper, having a thickness of 2 mm and a diameter of 100 mm, and a loudspeaker according to the invention, wherein a vibrating element is applied in the central part of the membrane.

(35) FIG. 2 shows the results of a FEA simulation in case of a loudspeaker without vibrating element, which shows the sound pressure level (SPL) according to the frequency. As shown in the chart of FIG. 2, a peak of SPL is obtained for a frequency (fc) of approximately 13 kHz. Instead, the SPL drops dramatically for frequencies higher than 13 kHz. According to these results, the dimensions of the vibrating element (9) are selected in such a way as to operate at the frequency (fc) of approximately 15 kHz in order to attenuate the peak of the SPL and avoid a reduction of the SPL at higher frequencies.

(36) With reference to FIG. 3, the results of the simulation with vibrating element (9) have been overlapped to the results of the FEA simulation without vibrating element. As shown in the chart, with the vibrating element, a minimum value is obtained at the frequency fc of approximately 13 kHz because the vibrating element (9) contributes to absorb the vibration of the membrane at said frequency. Instead, a peak of the SPL is obtained at a frequency FD of approximately 17 kHz, which covers the reduction of the SPL obtained without the vibrating element.

(37) Moreover, FEA simulations were performed on the physical deformation and the stress of the membrane, without and with the vibrating element.

(38) With reference to FIG. 4, at a frequency of approximately 13 kHz, the membrane without the vibrating element suffers a high deformation in its central part. For this reason, it was decided to dispose the vibrating element in the central part of the membrane.

(39) Instead, with reference to FIG. 5, at a frequency of approximately 13 kHz, the membrane with the vibrating element suffers a low deformation in its central part, whereas the vibrating element suffers the maximum deformation.

(40) Furthermore, simulations of the SPL were performed at given frequencies on the surface around the loudspeaker, along a transverse section plane.

(41) With reference to FIG. 6, radiation lobes, which are shown as light-colored bands, are evident in the case of a loudspeaker without vibrating element, at a frequency of 15 kHz. The lobes demonstrate that the behavior of the loudspeaker without vibrating element is not optimal at the frequency of 15 KHz. Consequently, according to the distance from the loudspeaker and to the inclination relative to the axis of the loudspeaker, there will be areas with a different sound pressure level that are fragmented in proportion to the radiation lobes.

(42) Instead, as shown in FIG. 7, in the case of a loudspeaker with vibrating element, the radiation lobes disappear almost completely. The dark-colored part above the membrane (4) indicates a good sound diffusion, which is substantially uniform in all the areas covered by the loudspeaker.

(43) The dimensions of the vibrating element (9) were selected according to the FEA simulations. In such a specific case, for example, the shank (91) was selected with a height of approximately 2-3 mm and the mass (92) with a diameter of approximately 6-10 mm. Otherwise said, the diameter of the mass (92) is lower than 1/10 of the diameter of the membrane. The total weight of the vibrating element (9) is 0.05 g; considering the sum of the weights of the membrane (4) and of the rim (5), which is 5 g, the vibrating element accounts for 1% of the weight of the membrane (4) and of the rim (5). The constructional tolerance on the weight of the membrane (4) and of the rim (5) is approximately 5%. Therefore, the vibrating element has a weight that is lower than 5% of the weight of the membrane (4), i.e. lower than the constructional tolerance of the membrane.

(44) The vibrating element (9) was physically built and applied on the central part of the membrane (4). In order to ensure that the results of the simulations were correct, experimental tests were performed to make real measurements of the SPL of the loudspeaker without the vibrating element, and of the SPL of the loudspeaker with the vibrating element, by placing a microphone at a distance of 1 meter from the loudspeaker, in aligned position relative to the axis of the loudspeaker.

(45) As clearly shown in FIG. 8, the experimental tests gave the same results as the simulation, i.e. a better frequency response and a more uniform SPL are obtained with the vibrating element (9), with a better performance at high frequencies.

(46) The experimental tests were repeated by placing the microphone on a straight line inclined by 15 relative to the axis of the loudspeaker (see FIG. 9) and by placing the microphone on a straight line inclined by 30 relative to the axis of the loudspeaker (see FIG. 10).

(47) As shown in the charts of FIGS. 9 and 10, the solution with the vibrating element (9) gives better results also when the microphone is disposed in off-axis position relative to the axis of the loudspeaker.

(48) FIG. 11 shows a variant, wherein the vibrating element (9) is disposed under the membrane (4) in a central part of the membrane; otherwise said, the mass (92) of the vibrating element faces the magnetic unit (M).

(49) FIG. 12 shows an additional variant, wherein the loudspeaker comprises a first vibrating element (9) disposed above the membrane (4) and a second vibrating element (109) disposed under the membrane. The structure of the second vibrating element (109) is substantially similar to the one of the first vibrating element (9). The second vibrating element (109) comprises a base (190), a shank (191) that projects from the base and a mass (192) that projects from the shank (91) in cantilever mode.

(50) The shanks (91, 191) of the two vibrating elements are disposed in axial position relative to the axis of the membrane (4).

(51) In this case, the base (190) and the shank (191) of the second vibrating element have the same dimensions as the base (90) and the shank (91) of the first vibrating element. Instead, the mass (192) of the second vibrating element has a larger diameter than the diameter of the mass (92) of the first vibrating element. For example, the mass (192) of the second vibrating element has a diameter that is approximately 2-3 times the diameter of the mass (92) of the first vibrating element. Such a solution allows to tune two vibrating elements (9; 109) at two different frequencies.

(52) FIG. 13 shows a first variant of the vibrating element, wherein the shank (91) has a parallelepiped structure and the mass (92) has a cylindrical structure with orthogonal axis relative to the axis of the shank (91).

(53) FIG. 14 shows a second variant of the vibrating element, wherein the mass (92) comprises a plurality of tabs (93) that protrude radially from the shank (91). For illustrative purposes, the mass (92) comprises three tabs (93) that are equally spaced angularly. Each tab (93) has a rounded ending edge (94) with higher diameter than the thickness of the tab.

(54) Numerous equivalent variations and modifications can be made to the present embodiments of the invention, which are within the reach of an expert of the field, falling in any case within the scope of the invention.