Method for the manufacturing of Al—Mg—Si and Al—Mg—Si—Cu extrusion alloys
10900107 · 2021-01-26
Assignee
Inventors
- Ulf Tundal (Sunndalsøra, NO)
- Jostein Røyset (Sunndalsøra, NO)
- Oddvin Reiso (Sunndalsøra, NO)
- Øystein Bauger (Trondheim, NO)
Cpc classification
C21D9/0062
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C22F1/043
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C22F1/043
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C22F1/05
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C21D9/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
Method for the manufacturing of an AlMgSi(Cu) extrusion alloy, the alloy initially being cast to extrusion billet(s), containing in wt. % Si: 0.20-1.50 Mg: 0.25-1.50 Fe: 0.05-0.50 Cu: 0.00-1.00 Mn: 0.00-1.00 Cr: 0.00-0.50 Zn: 0.00-0.50 Ti: 0.00-0.20, and
including incidental impurities and balance Al.
Claims
1. A method for manufacturing an AlMgSi(Cu) extrusion alloy comprising: casting one or more billets of an alloy comprising, in wt %: Si: 0.20-1.50 Mg: 0.25-1.50 Fe: 0.05-0.50 Cu: 0.00-1.00 Mn: 0.00-1.00 Cr: 0.00-0.50 Zn: 0.00-0.50 Ti: 0.00-0.20, and incidental impurities and a balance of Al, heating the one or more billets to a homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 between 520 C. and 620 C. and holding the one or more billets at the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 for a predetermined time, cooling the one or more billets from the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 to a temperature T.sub.2, and further cooling the one or more billets at a rate of 150 C./h or faster, wherein the temperature T.sub.2 is at least 10 C. lower than the temperature T.sub.1 and at or above the solvus line for Mg+Si, and wherein the cooling the one or more billets at a rate of 150 C./h or faster begins 30 minutes to 20 hours after the completion of the holding the one or more billets at the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 for a predetermined time so that a reduction of the solute content of Mn and Fe takes place.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the one or more billets are cooled monotonically from the temperature T.sub.1 to the temperature T.sub.2.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein a holding time of up to 20 hours at the temperature T.sub.2 is applied.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein an average intermediate cooling rate between the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 and the onset of the cooling the one or more billets at a rate of 150 C./h or faster is <150 C. per hour but >4 C. per hour.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises, in wt %: Si: 0.30-0.6 Mg: 0.35-0.6 Fe: 0.10-0.30 Cu: 0.00-0.10 Mn: 0.00-0.10 Cr: 0.00-0.05 Zn: 0.00-0.15 Ti: 0.00-0.10, and incidental impurities and a balance of Al.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises, in wt %: Si: 0.20-0.6 Mg: 0.45-0.9 Fe: 0.05-0.35 Cu: 0.00-0.10 Mn: 0.00-0.10 Cr: 0.00-0.10 Zn: 0.00-0.10 Ti: 0.00-0.10, and incidental impurities and a balance of Al.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises, in wt %: Si: 0.50-0.9 Mg: 0.40-0.7 Fe: 0.05-0.35 Cu: 0.00-0.30 Mn: 0.00-0.50 Cr: 0.00-0.30 Zn: 0.00-0.20 Ti: 0.00-0.10, and incidental impurities and a balance of Al.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein alloy the comprises, in wt %: Si: 0.7-1.3 Mg: 0.6-1.2 Fe: 0.05-0.50 Cu: 0.00-0.10 Mn: 0.40-1.0 Cr: 0.00-0.25 Zn: 0.00-0.20 Ti: 0.00-0.10 incidental impurities and a balance of Al.
9. A method for manufacturing an AlMgSi(Cu) extrusion alloy comprising: casting one or more billets of an alloy comprising, in wt %: Si: 0.40-0.8 Mg: 0.8-1.2 Fe: 0.05-0.7 Cu: 0.15-0.40 Mn: 0-0.15 Cr: 0.04-0.35 Zn: 0-0.25 Ti: 0-0.15, and incidental impurities and a balance of Al, heating the one or more billets to a homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 between 520 C. and 620 C. and holding the one or more billets at the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 for a predetermined time, cooling the one or more billets from the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 to a temperature T.sub.2, and further cooling the one or more billets at a rate of 150 C./h or faster, wherein the temperature T.sub.2 is at least 10 C. lower than the temperature T.sub.1 and at or above the solvus line for Mg+Si, and wherein the cooling the one or more billets at a rate of 150 C./h or faster begins 30 minutes to 20 hours after the completion of the holding the one or more billets at the homogenisation holding temperature T.sub.1 for a predetermined time so that a reduction of the solute content of Mn and Fe takes place.
Description
(1) The invention will be further described in the following by way of examples and with reference to the drawings and figures where:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8) The normal homogenization practice for AlMgSi(Cu) alloys is to heat the material to the desired holding temperature, keep it at the holding temperature for a certain length of time, and then cool with forced air to room temperature. With the present invention It has been found by the inventors that it is possible to achieve considerable improvements in extrudability by applying a method which involves bringing the homogenized material from the homogenization temperature T.sub.1 down to a lower temperature T.sub.2 before forced air cooling, T.sub.2 being at least 10 C. lower than T.sub.1, for the purpose of bringing non-hardening elements out of solid solution. In many cases, choosing T.sub.2 close to the solvus temperature with respect to the hardening elements may be optimal. The method may be a slow cooling to the temperature T.sub.2 where the forced air cooling starts, or a second holding segment at the lower temperature T.sub.2, or even cooling to a temperature T.sub.3 lower than T.sub.2, then reheating to T.sub.2 before the onset of forced air cooling. Any of these methods are referred to as intermediate cooling segment.
(9) The principle of the method is further described with reference to
(10) To use the principle of the invention one can lower the temperature from T.sub.1 to T.sub.2, where T.sub.2 may be at or above the solvus line for Mg+Si, and given that the time used to reduce the temperature, and/or the time applied at T.sub.2, is long enough a considerable reduction in solute content of Mn and Fe is possible. The Fe and Mn that goes out of solid solution goes to particles, either pre-existing or by forming new ones, and it is possible to measure an increased volume fraction of particles in the alloys at T.sub.2 compared to T.sub.1, as illustrated on the right side of
(11) It may be convenient to choose the temperature T.sub.2 to be equal to or slightly higher than the solvus temperature, as in the description above. In this way, one will never risk the formation of Mg.sub.2Si particles before the onset of rapid cooling. At temperatures only slightly below the solvus temperature, however, it takes long time before the precipitation of Mg.sub.2Si takes place. This is known from the literature (for example B. Milkereit et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A vol. 550 (2012) pp 87-96). Thus, it is possible to design a cooling practice where T.sub.2 may be lower than the solvus temperature, and thereby achieve a further reduction of the solid solution content of Fe, Mn and other non-hardening elements.
(12) It is also possible to cool the metal from the temperature T.sub.1 to a temperature T.sub.3 lower than the Mg.sub.2Si solvus temperature, allow for some Mg.sub.2Si particles to form while simultaneously bringing more non-hardening elements out of solid solution, and then reheat the material to a temperature T.sub.2 above the Mg.sub.2Si solvus temperature for sufficient time to dissolve the Mg.sub.2Si particles before the onset of rapid cooling The following examples show the benefit of using an intermediate cooling segment:
EXAMPLE 1
(13) Alloy 1 of Table 1 were subjected to two different homogenization treatments:
(14) H1Rapid heating to 575 C., holding at this temperature for 2 h and 15 min, and then rapidly cooled from this temperature with forced air at an average rate of approx. 400 C./h in the temperature interval 500 C.-250 C.
(15) H2Rapid heating to 585 C., holding at this temperature for 15 min, cooling down to 505 C. at a rate of 40 C./h, then rapid cooling with forced air at an average rate of approx. 400 C./h in the temperature interval 500 C.-250 C.
(16) Extrusion billets for the alloys were extruded at a laboratory extrusion press, and the extrusion pressure at different ram positions was measured and is shown in
(17) The reduction in pressure may seem moderate, but even small differences in extrusion pressure may give considerable gain in extrusion productivity. For lean extrusion alloys like the one in this example, the achieved reduction in extrusion pressure may lead to a 5-10% increase in the critical extrusion speed before tearing of the profile takes place. This improvement is particularly useful for the extrusion of complex shapes.
EXAMPLE 2
(18) Alloy 2 of Table 1 was subjected to two different homogenisation treatments:
(19) H3: Rapid heating to 580 C., holding at this temperature for 2 h 30 min, cooling at 60 C./h down to 520 C. and then rapid cooling with forced air at an average rate of approx. 300 C./h in the temperature interval 500 C.-250 C.
(20) H4: Rapid heating to 580 C., holding at this temperature for 2 h 30 min, cooling at 12 C./h down to 520 C. and then rapid cooling with forced air at an average rate of approx. 300 C./h in the temperature interval 500 C.-250 C.
(21) The alloy is used for complex hollow shapes that are sensitive to changes in the extrusion pressure of the alloy. Full-scale extrusion trial indicated that there was a gain of approx. 30% in productivity of the homogenisation practice H4 over the practice H3.
EXAMPLE 3
(22) Alloy 3 of Table 1 was subjected to 2 different homogenisation treatments:
(23) H1 as described in Example 1
(24) H5: rapid heating to 585 C., holding at this temperature for 10 h, cooling at 10 C./h down to 535 C. and then rapid cooling with forced air at an average rate of approx. 400 C./h in the temperature interval 500 C.-250 C.
(25) Extrusion billets for the alloys were extruded at a laboratory extrusion press, and the extrusion pressure was measured to be approx. 3% lower for material homogenized by the procedure H5 compared to the procedure H1.
(26) Again, a 3% reduction in pressure may seem moderate, but for high alloyed alloys like in this example the acceleration time of the extrusion press may be an issue. The acceleration time depends strongly on the extrusion pressure. For critical profiles, a 3% reduction in extrusion pressure may give a productivity increase of 10% or more.
(27) The improvements in extrusion pressure and extrudability achieved in the examples above are believed to be related to a lower solute level of non-hardening elements by the new procedures. Measuring the solute level of AlMgSi(Cu) alloys is a challenging task. An indirect way of doing such measurements is to measure the volume fraction of particles formed by the non-hardening elements.
EXAMPLE 4
(28) Alloy 1 of Table 1 was homogenised at 595 C. and 575 C. for a fixed length of time, and then water-quenched from this temperature. Automated image analyses of the resulting microstructure with light optical microscope indicates that the volume fraction of non-hardening particles increases from approx. 0.65% after homogenisation at 595 C. to approx. 0.80% after homogenisation at 575 C., indicating a considerable reduction of non-hardening elements in solution after homogenisation at the lower temperature.
(29) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Alloys used in the examples. Compositions are in wt. %. Alloy Si Fe Cu Mn Mg Cr Ti 1 0.45 0.20 0.05 0.37 0.01 2 0.70 0.20 0.10 0.24 0.45 0.09 0.02 3 1.01 0.23 0.40 0.66 0.03
(30) Electric and Thermal Conductivity
(31) An interesting side-effect of removing non-hardening elements from solid solution by the methods described above is an increase in the electrical conductivity of the alloys. This is particularly useful for alloys used for electric conductors, such as busbars. The thermal conductivity is also affected by the content of non-hardening elements in solid solution, and the present method is useful for optimising the thermal conductivity for products such as heat sinks.
(32) Practical Ways of Implementing the Method in the Casthouse
(33) Extrusion billets of the AlMgSi(Cu) type are normally homogenised in the casthouse before transportation to the extrusion plant. There are two common types of homogenisation furnaces; batch homogenisation furnaces and continuous homogenisation furnaces.
(34) Batch Homogenisation Furnace
(35) In batch type of homogenisation furnaces the common procedure for homogenization is to insert a load of billets into a furnace chamber, then heat the billets to the desired homogenisation temperature and keep the billets at this temperature in the furnace chamber for a desired length of time. After the holding time, the furnace billet load is removed from the furnace chamber and cooled. Cooling is usually done in a cooling chamber where the furnace load is cooled rapidly in forced air.
(36) Large casthouses may have several furnace chambers and cooling chambers. Since the heating and holding segment in the furnace chamber takes longer time than cooling in the cooling chamber the number of furnace chambers in a large casthouse may be larger than the number of cooling chambers.
(37) For the present invention batch homogenization arrangements, i.e. operation of the furnace chambers and cooling chambers, may be applied in several practical ways, but not limited to the examples given below:
(38) 1Cooling from the temperature T.sub.1 to a temperature T.sub.2 in the furnace chamber, then move the furnace load to the cooling chamber
(39) 2Removing the furnace load from the furnace chamber at T.sub.1, cooling to a temperature T.sub.2 outside the chambers, then move the furnace load to the cooling chamber.
(40) 3Moving the furnace load from the furnace chamber at T.sub.1 to the cooling chamber, cool at a slow rate to a temperature T.sub.2 in the cooling chamber, then increase the cooling speed in the cooling chamber.
(41) 4Moving the furnace load from the furnace chamber at T.sub.1 to a second furnace chamber at the temperature T.sub.2, keep the load in the second furnace chamber for the desired length of time and then move the furnace load to the cooling chamber
(42) 5Cooling the furnace load from the temperature T.sub.1 to a temperature T.sub.3 lower than T.sub.2 by any method, then reheat to the temperature T.sub.2 in a furnace chamber and finally move the furnace load to the cooling chamber.
(43) Continuous Homogenisation Furnace
(44) A continuous homogenisation furnace is normally divided in three parts, a heating zone, a holding zone and a cooling zone. The individual logs of extrusion ingots are moved through the zones of the furnace.
(45) There are at least two practical approaches of how to operate the continuous homogenisation furnace for making use of the present invention. The methods may require modifications of the homogenisation furnace, depending on the existing furnace design.
(46) 1Slow initial cooling in the cooling zone. Most cooling chambers are designed to air-cool the extrusion logs rapidly. A slow initial cooling will require modification of the cooling zone, with little or no air flow in the first part of the cooling zone and a high air flow in the last part of the cooling zone. This will require the installation of a valve to separate the air-flow between the two parts of the cooling zone. The main drawback of such a solution is that due to the shortened length of the rapid-cooling-zone, it will lead to a slow throughput of extrusion logs in the homogenisation furnace. This can be overcome by installing an additional cooling device, for instance a water quench device, at the end of the conventional cooling zone.
(47) 2Instead of transferring the extrusion logs to the cooling zone it may be practical to transfer the logs to a purpose-built holding station. In its simplest design, this may just be an open-air storage where the billets are allowed to slowly cool to the desired temperature before the next transfer to the cooling zone. Since the cooling rate in air depends on the billet diameter, an open-air storage will be more useful for large billet diameters, and less useful for small billet diameters. A more sophisticated design may consist of a separate holding chamber with options for controlled cooling and possibly also options for heating. The main drawback for a holding-station solution is the cost of design, construction and installation of such a station, as well as the extra space that a holding station will occupy in the casthouse.
(48) 3It is possible to use the holding zone for the slow cooling of the extrusion logs. The extrusion logs are brought to the temperature T.sub.1 in the heating zone, whereas the temperature in the holding zone is set to a lower temperature T.sub.2. The extrusion logs will then gradually approach the temperature T.sub.2 while moving through the holding zone. There is normally a certain air-flow between the heating zone and the holding zone. It may lead to difficulties in reaching the desired temperature T.sub.2 in the holding zone if there is a flow of hotter air from the heating zone. It may therefore be necessary to install a valve or some other obstacle for the air-flow between the heating zone and the holding zone. The necessity for such a modification is dictated by the design of the continuous homogenisation furnace in question, the temperature difference between T.sub.1 and T.sub.2, and the billet diameter.
(49) If the temperature difference between T.sub.1 and T.sub.2 is large and/or if the billet diameter is large, it may be necessary to improve the cooling capacity in the holding zone. The cooling capacity can be increased either by increasing the flow-rate of air at the temperature T.sub.2 in the holding zone, or to install fans that cool with ambient air in the start of the holding zone. With cooling from ambient air it is possible to cool the extrusion logs rapidly down to the temperature T.sub.2, and the temperature-time profile of the individual extrusion log in the holding zone will then have the character of a holding step at T.sub.2 rather than a cooling step from T.sub.1 to T.sub.2. Cooling from ambient air also allows for a cooling to of the logs to a temperature T.sub.3 lower than T.sub.2, and then re-heating to T.sub.2 before reaching the end of the holding zone.
(50) The main drawback of using the holding zone for cooling the extrusion logs to the temperature T.sub.2 is that the time at the temperature T.sub.1 will be very short. Two of the purposes of the homogenisation method are to change the type and primary Fe-based particles from the -AlFeSi-type to the -AlFeSi-type, and to achieve a high degree of spheroidisation of the -AlFeSi particles. Both of these processes are facilitated by higher homogenization temperatures and longer homogenization times. Merely heating the extrusion logs to the temperature T.sub.1 in the heating zone and then cool them to T.sub.2 may lead to unsatisfactorily low degree of -AlFeSi to -AlFeSi particle transformation as well as unsatisfactorily low degree of spheroidisation. This may be compensated for by setting the temperature T.sub.1 to a higher value than what is common in the industry. For many alloys, a temperature T.sub.1 in the range 570 C.-585 C. is commonly used in the industry. Experiments have shown that the degree of -AlFeSi to -AlFeSi particle transformation as well as the degree of spheroidisation after 15 minutes at 595 C. is comparable to that after 2 hours at 575 C. Thus, with such temperature setpoint for T.sub.1 the degree of spheroidisation will be in the normal range even if the extrusion logs are cooled to a lower temperature T.sub.2 in the holding zone.
(51) For commissioning of new continuous homogenisation furnaces, the present invention may call for a design other than the traditional heating-zone, holding-zone, cooling zone set-up.
(52) During casting of extrusion ingots, a solute-enriched zone is formed close to the billet surface. This zone is commonly referred to as Inverse Segregation Zone, or ISZ, and the average thickness of the zone is typically in the range 50-200 m, but can be even narrower or even wider, depending on factors such as casting technology, alloy composition and billet diameter. The enrichment of solute in this zone leads to a lower melting point, or more precisely a lower solidus-temperature, in the ISZ than in the rest of the extrusion ingot. This imposes a practical limitation on the maximum setting of the temperature T.sub.1 in the homogenisation furnace, since partial melting of the ISZ may lead to undesired defects in the billet surface and undesired microstructural changes in the ISZ. In order to explore the full advantage of using the holding zone for slow cooling by using a high setting for T.sub.1 in the heating zone in the continuous homogenisation furnace, it is therefore desirable to use extrusion ingots produced in such a manner that the solute enrichment in the ISZ is minimized. A casting technology for producing extrusion ingots with such characteristics has recently been developed (B. A. Heggset et al: US patent application 2006/0219378). With this casting technology, known as LPC casting, it has been proven possible to use a homogenisation temperature T.sub.1 of at least 610 C. for lean AlMgSi alloys without partial melting reactions taking place in the ISZ as demonstrated in