Cam for a Camshaft

Abstract

A cam having at least two part cams are arranged axially behind one another along a longitudinal axis includes an undercut between the cam parts. The part cams have running faces which lie radially on the outside of the part cams and have different variable running face contours. The undercut has a profile with a variable contour which is dependent in each case on that adjacent running face contour which is at a smaller radial spacing from the longitudinal axis than the other running face contour.

Claims

1. A cam for a camshaft, comprising: at least two part cams arranged axially behind one another along a longitudinal axis of the camshaft, and an undercut between adjacent ones of the at least two part cams, wherein the at least two part cams have radially outward-facing running faces with different variable running face contours in a circumferential direction around the camshaft longitudinal axis, the undercut has an undercut profile with a variable undercut contour along the camshaft longitudinal axis, and in the circumferential direction around the camshaft longitudinal axis, the undercut contour depends on the running face contours of the adjacent ones of the at least two cam parts, such that a radial spacing of the undercut contour from the camshaft longitudinal axis is smaller than a smallest one of the adjacent ones of the at least two running face contours.

2. The cam according to claim 1, wherein at a tangential transition on regions of the undercut contour where the outward-facing running faces of the adjacent ones of the at least two part cams have a same radial spacing from the camshaft longitudinal axis, the dependence of the undercut contour changes from one to the other of the adjacent running face contours.

3. The cam according to claim 1, the undercut profile is constant along the undercut contour.

4. The cam according to claim 1, the undercut profile is variable along the undercut contour.

5. The cam according to claim 1, the undercut profile has an axis of symmetry perpendicular to the undercut contour.

6. The cam according to claim 1, a depth of a smallest spacing from the longitudinal axis of the undercut profile is constant along the undercut contour.

7. The cam according to claim 1, a depth of a smallest spacing from the longitudinal axis of the undercut profile is variable along the undercut contour.

8. The cam according to claim 1, the at least two part cams and the undercut are formed using a forming technique.

9. The cam according to claim 8, the at least two part cams have rounded portions toward their respective side faces.

10. The cam according to claim 9, the rounded portions formed using forming technology.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] FIG. 1 shows a three-dimensional illustration of a multiple cam in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention,

[0032] FIG. 2 shows an illustration from the side of the cam from FIG. 1,

[0033] FIG. 3 shows a section through the cam from FIG. 1 along the longitudinal axis,

[0034] FIG. 4 shows a view of an end side of the cam from FIG. 1,

[0035] FIG. 5 shows a section through the cam from FIG. 1 perpendicularly with respect to the longitudinal axis, and

[0036] FIG. 6 shows a diagrammatic illustration of the dependence of the contour of the undercut in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] FIG. 1 shows a multiple cam which has three part cams 1, 2, 3. The part cams 1, 2, 3 in each case have a running face 1, 2, 3, by way of which they come into contact with a rocker arm in the installed state. As a result, the different radial courses of the running faces 1, 2, 3 (that is to say, the variable running face contours) permit different switching behaviors of the associated cylinder of the internal combustion engine.

[0038] FIG. 2 shows the cam from FIG. 1 in a side view, and FIG. 3 shows a section along the longitudinal axis L. FIG. 4 illustrates a view of an end side of the cam. FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 will be discussed together in the following text.

[0039] It can be seen (see FIG. 2) how the three part cams 1, 2, 3 are situated behind one another along the longitudinal axis L. An undercut 10, 20 is situated between in each case two part cams 1, 2 and 2, 3.

[0040] The illustration from the side (see FIG. 2) and the section (see FIG. 3) allow a view of the profiles of the part cams 1, 2, 3 and the profiles 10, 20 of the undercuts 10, 20. The profiles describe the course along the longitudinal axis L.

[0041] Here, the profiles of the part cams 1, 2, 3 are in each case a constant course parallel to the longitudinal axis L. The profiles 10, 20 of the undercuts 10, 20 are distinguished in each case by a substantially symmetrical shape. There is a lowest point which is represented by the smallest spacing from the longitudinal axis L and, laterally with respect thereto, the flanks which run to the outside and are elevated as indentations with respect to the adjoining part cams 1, 2, 3.

[0042] The contours (see FIG. 4) in turn define the course in the radial direction R around the longitudinal axis L. It can be seen how the part cam 3 extends radially to the outside to a different extent with its outer running face, and how the middle part cam 2 protrudes radially beyond it in a region (as can be seen on the left here).

[0043] FIG. 5 shows a section through the undercut 10 between the part cam 1 which is situated on the left hand side in FIG. 2 and the middle part cam 2. Here, the running face contour of the rear part cam 1 and, using dashed lines, the contour 10 of the undercut 10 can be seen.

[0044] For improved clarification of the course of the contour of the undercut, FIG. 6 diagrammatically shows the dependence of the two adjoining part cams.

[0045] The running face contours of the two part cams are shown: one of them by way of a solid line and one of them by way of a dashed line. It can be seen that the two running face contours are identical in the region of what is known as the base circle (here, identified by A for sector A for clarification). This allows the axial displacement of the cam in the installed state. In said sector A, the contour of the undercut is therefore dependent on the two running face contours, since both are at the respectively smallest spacing from the longitudinal axis.

[0046] In addition, there is a first region (shown on the left here and denoted by B) and a second region (shown on the right here and denoted by C), in which regions in each case one of the two running face contours is arranged closer than the other to the longitudinal axis or has a smaller radial extent. In sector B, the running face contour which is shown by way of the solid line is at the smallest spacing from the longitudinal axis, with the result that the contour of the undercut follows said running face contour. In sector C, conversely, the other running face contour (shown by way of the dashed line) is at the smallest spacing from the longitudinal axis, and the contour of the running face follows said running face contour in said spatial angular region. Therefore, the contour of the undercut consists accordingly of three sectors, in which in each case the running face contour with the smallest radial extent is followed. This dependence is produced in one embodiment by virtue of the fact that the running face contours are projected onto the plane of the undercut, and the matching projection is used.

[0047] The regions of the change of the dependence of the contour of the undercut are identified by way of circles. In particular, a tangential transition takes place in said zones by way of example in the embodiment which is shown. Therefore, a radius which emanates from the longitudinal axis is also illustrated in each case for clarification, the transition being performed tangentially with respect to said radius.

[0048] The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.