Method and Apparatus for Deoxygenation of Liquids
20210008465 ยท 2021-01-14
Inventors
- Arjen Huizinga ('s-Gravenhage, NL)
- Earl Lawrence Vincent Goetheer (Mol, BE)
- Juliana Garcia Moretz-Sohn Monteiro (Alphen aan den Rijn, NL)
- Purvil Maganlal Khakharia (Delft, NL)
- Martin Mohana (Delft, NL)
Cpc classification
B01D19/0005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C02F1/008
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D19/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02W10/10
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
A23V2002/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C02F1/20
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D61/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a method for deoxygenation of a first liquid, which method comprises contacting said first liquid with a membrane, which membrane is on its filtrate side in contact with a second liquid comprising an oxygen scavenger.
There is provided a second method for deoxygenation of a first liquid which method comprises contacting said first liquid with a membrane, which membrane is on its filtrate side in contact with an oxygen-lean sweep gas.
The invention is also directed to an apparatus for carrying out these methods.
The present invention provides a very efficient means to deoxygenate liquids of all sorts, such as CO.sub.2 scrubbing solutions and beverages.
Claims
1. A method for deoxygenation of a first liquid comprising contacting said first liquid with a membrane, which membrane is on its filtrate side in contact with a second liquid comprising an oxygen scavenger, wherein the first liquid is a CO.sub.2 scrubbing liquid.
2. The method according to claim 1 in which the temperature of the filtrate side is controlled in order to optimize the oxygen removal.
3. The method according to claim 1 in which the pH of the filtrate side is controlled in order to optimize the oxygen removal.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said oxygen scavenger is selected from the group consisting of one or more inorganic compounds, organic compounds, and combinations thereof.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein: said inorganic compound is selected from the group consisting of metals, metal oxides, sulfites, and combinations thereof.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein said organic compound is selected from the group consisting of hydrazine, carbohydrazide, erythorbate, hydroquinone, diethylhydroxylamine, xylitol, threitol, dithiothreitol, erythritol, ethylene glycol, butanediol and other structurally similar sugar alcohols and glycol compounds, boric acid, unsaturated fatty acids, hydrocarbons, polymers, and combinations thereof.
7. A method for deoxygenation of a first liquid comprising contacting said first liquid with a membrane, which membrane is on its filtrate side in contact with an oxygen-lean sweep gas, wherein the first liquid is a CO.sub.2 scrubbing liquid.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein said sweep gas is CO.sub.2.
9. The method according to claim 7, wherein said sweep gas is obtained from a stripper column.
10. The method according to claim 7, wherein said sweep gas is introduced in an absorber column after having been in contact with said membrane, in order to recover volatile components of said first liquid present that are present in said sweep gas.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein said membrane is a membrane contactor.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein said membrane is an oxygen selective membrane (OSM).
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein said OSM comprises fluorinated hydrocarbons, silicon based compounds or combinations thereof.
14. (canceled)
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein contacting said first liquid with said membrane takes place downstream of an absorber column.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein an absorber sump is located downstream of contacting said first liquid with said membrane.
17. The method according to claim 15, wherein contacting said first liquid with said membrane takes place 5 minutes or less after said first liquid exits said absorber column.
18. An apparatus for the deoxygenation of a first liquid comprising a membrane module, which comprises a membrane, which module has a filtrate side and a retentate side, which module is present inside a container, which module is connected to a feed for feeding a scavenger solution and which module comprises inlet and outlet for contacting said first liquid with the retentate side of said membrane.
19. An apparatus for the deoxygenation of a first liquid comprising a membrane module, which comprises a membrane, which module has a filtrate side and a retentate side, which module is present inside a container, which module is connected to a feed for feeding an oxygen-lean sweep gas and which module comprises inlet and outlet for contacting said first liquid with the retentate side of said membrane.
20. (canceled)
21. The method according to claim 7, wherein said membrane is a membrane contactor.
22. The method according to claim 7, wherein said membrane is an oxygen selective membrane (OSM).
23. The method according to claim 22, wherein said OSM comprises fluorinated hydrocarbons, silicon based compounds or combinations thereof.
24. The method according to claim 7, wherein contacting said first liquid with said membrane takes place downstream of an absorber column.
25. The method according to claim 24, wherein an absorber sump is located downstream of contacting said first liquid with said membrane.
26. The method according to claim 24, wherein contacting said first liquid with said membrane takes place 5 minutes or less after said first liquid exits said absorber column.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0035] According to the invention a liquid which contains dissolved oxygen is contacted with a membrane. According to the first method of the invention, the membrane is on its filtrate side in contact with a second liquid, which comprises an oxygen scavenger. According to the second method of the invention, the membrane is on its filtrate side in contact with an oxygen-lean sweep gas.
[0036] Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is assumed that the process of the invention is efficient because of the driving force that is obtained by the presence of the oxygen scavenger or oxygen-lean sweep gas on the filtrate side. Either selective membranes or membrane contactors can be used.
[0037] With reference to
[0038] With reference to
[0039] In accordance with the invention membrane contactors as well as selective membranes can be used. The membrane acts as a mechanical barrier that lowers or completely avoids direct contact between the oxygen scavenger or the oxygen-lean gas, and the liquid to be deoxidized.
[0040] Aspects such as the membrane geometry, gas and liquid velocities, scavenger concentration, the presence and nature of a catalyst can all be manipulated so that the oxygen removal is maximized.
[0041] In a preferred embodiment, the membrane used is an oxygen selective membrane (OSM). These membranes have the advantage of (partially) avoiding the diffusion of components other than oxygen into the liquid that contains the oxygen scavenger, or into the oxygen-lean sweep gas.
[0042] OSMs can be synthesized or commercially obtained as polymeric films. The films can take the shape of films, gels, liquids immobilized in a porous inert substrate, and the like. Suitable OSMs are summarized Crowther and Salomon (Membranes 2 (2012) 216-227, accessible at http.//.mdpi.com/2077-0375/2/216, accessed on 28 Mar. 2018 and 28 Mar. 2019).
[0043] Two preferred groups of materials for fabrication of OSMs in various configurations are fluorinated hydrocarbons and silicon based compounds. Combinations of one or more compounds from each of these groups are also possible. It follows from the above that the materials for fabrication of OSMs are present in the fabricated OSM itself.
[0044] Suitable fluorinated hydrocarbons for the purpose of the present invention are for instance perfluoropolyether (PFPE) (e.g. commercially obtainable as Krytox 1506), polymeric perfluoro compounds, for instance those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,985,475, such as polyperfluoroalkyl oxides, polyperfluoroalkyl amines, which are optionally UV cured. Typical values for P(O.sub.2) are up to 1000 Barrer (with P(O.sub.2)/P(H.sub.2O) about 3-4 or more). Plastics from the Teflon AF family as described in Ansaloni et al. (Journal of Membrane Science, 537 (2017) 272-282 are also suitable.
[0045] Suitable silicon based compounds are polysiloxanes, silicone oils, fluorinated polysiloxanes, and fluorinated polysiloxane copolymer with alkyl methacrylates. Polysiloxanes are thermally stable, exhibit high 02 solubilities, can be used as a liquid immobilized in an inert polymer and thermally or UV cured (vulcanized) to produce a silicon rubber. Typical values for the permeability of O.sub.2 in dimethylsilicone rubbers are above 600 Barrer, and around 100-250 Barrer in methacryloxypropyl terminated polydimethyl contact lenses.
[0046] Other materials that may be used as an OSM are Melinex 301E1 (ML), high density polyethylene (HDPE), silicalite zeolite or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (e.g. on nickel foam support), silicone oil immobilized in PTFE or nickel/yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ)/silicate layered membranes, and Teflon (PTFE) coated fiberglass cloth (TCFC) with and without a silicone adhesive layer.
[0047] The membranes may be in the form of flat sheets, or other well known configurations, such as hollow fiber membranes.
[0048] Suitable oxygen scavengers for use in the present invention are reducing agents that react selectively and typically irreversibly with oxygen. The scavenger functionality relies on chemical reactions of specially selected and formulated substrates with oxygen. The scavenging substrate acts as a reducing agent by chemically binding gaseous or dissolved molecular oxygen before it can react with the product. Oxygen scavengers formulations may contain either organic or inorganic compounds.
[0049] Examples of inorganic scavengers are Fe(0), Fe(II), sulfites (e.g. sodium sulfite), bisulfites, hydrazine and oxygen deficient metal oxides, such as described in WO2017203912. To enhance the solubility of metal species in the liquid from which oxygen is to be removed, chelating agents can be used, which form coordinate bonds. For instance, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is used to solubilize iron ions in water. Further examples can be found in KR101571062. Sulfites are fast and low in cost, and therefore are the most commonly used inorganic scavengers.
[0050] Examples of organic scavengers commonly used for water treatment pressure boilers include carbohydrazide, methylethylketoximes, hydroquinone, hydroxylamines, sodium erythorbate and ascorbic acid.
[0051] Furthermore, antioxidants are commonly used in the food and beverage industry. CN103007687 describes the suitable antioxidants such as xylitol, threitol, dithiothreitol, erythritol, ethylene glycol, butanediol and other structurally similar sugar alcohols and glycol compounds. Boric acid is used as an oxygen scavenger for rice, ascorbic acid (KR20170141986) is used for this purpose with fruits and fresh vegetables.
[0052] Unsaturated fatty acids, such as vegetable oils (see e.g. CA2992430), and hydrocarbons such as isoprene, butadiene and squalene are used as oxygen scavengers in all types of packaged food. These compounds are often used in combination with catalysts and iron or cobalt carriers. Suitable catalysts include transition metal catalysts, as described in EP2915842. The use of oxygen scavenging polymers is discussed in AU2014363890.
[0053] The use of promoters in combination with oxygen scavengers is also common. For instance, oximes (described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,487,745) may be used in combination with a quinone promotor, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,016.
[0054] An overview of suitable oxygen scavenger materials is given in U.S. Pat. No. 9,441,157.
[0055] Also combinations of these scavengers and catalysts or promoters may be used in accordance with the present invention.
[0056] The main advantage of the present invention is that the oxygen scavenger does not have to be added to, and does not have to be in direct contact with the liquid to be deoxygenated. Therefore, the products of the reaction between the scavenger and oxygen are also not present in the liquid. Thus, the choices of scavengers to be used in a specific application are not hindered by factors such as the compatibility between the scavenger (or its products) and the liquid to be deoxidized. This may enable the use of cheaper and readily available scavengers in many of the previously discussed applications, such as CO.sub.2 capture processes. In addition, this may also enable the use of solvent formulations which are prone to oxidative degradation, but otherwise effective for CO.sub.2 absorption.
[0057] Another advantage is that the deoxygenation reaction takes place in an environment which may be controlled to ensure fast and complete oxygen removal, by optimizing the pH and temperature of the liquid containing the scavenger. This is schematically depicted in
[0058] The invention can be carried out in batch or continuously. With reference to
[0059] An apparatus according to the invention can be designed so as to fit through the opening of containers for the beverage industry. In this way filled containers (bottles, cans, and the like) can be deoxygenized after they have been filled. Alternatively, the apparatus can be installed so that the liquids are deoxygenated during the filling process.
[0060]
[0061] Preferably, the time between absorption of O.sub.2 of the CO.sub.2 scrubbing liquid and deoxygenation is 10 minutes or less, further preferably 5 minutes or less, such as 1 minute or less, in order to prevent degradation of the scrubbing liquid prior to deoxygenation. To this end, an absorber sump or solvent buffer tank may be positioned downstream of the deoxygenation process. The residence time of the deoxygenized liquid in the absorber sump downstream of the deoxygenation process can be chosen according to the process variables, without long residence times resulting in degradation of the scrubbing liquid.
[0062]
[0063]
[0064] The method of the invention can also be used to deoxygenate MEG. By avoiding the addition of the oxygen scavenger directly to MEG, problems related to solubility and compatibility are avoided. Moreover, the pH of the scavenger solution can be controlled independent of the pH of the MEG solution, allowing the use of well-known oxygen scavengers that work optimally at pH above 9.
[0065] All references cited herein, both patent literate and non patent literature, are incorporated herein by reference.
EXAMPLES
[0066] In a bench scale CO.sub.2 capture system, a synthetic gas mixture containing 10 vol % oxygen, 27 vol % CO.sub.2 and nitrogen for balance was contacted with an aqueous solution of monoethanolamine (MEA). The fresh MEA solution contained 25 wt % MEA, and water for balance.
[0067] A Liqui-Cel membrane module, packed with a polypropylene (PP) membrane with 25% porosity, with an effective pore size of 0.04 micron was used for oxygen removal, arranged in hollow fibers with outer diameter and inner diameters of 300 and 200 micron, respectively (commercial name: X40 fiber).
[0068] A Memosens COS81D optode from Endress+Hauser was used to measure the oxygen content in the MEA solution, both upstream and downstream the membrane contactor. The sensor has oxygen-sensitive molecules (markers) which are integrated into an optically active layer (fluorescence layer). The sensor can be used between 0 to 60 C., and 0.02 to 13 bar. This is within the expected range for rich amine downstream of the absorber in the bench scale CO.sub.2 capture system, where the optode is installed. The measuring range is from 4 g/L to 30 mg/L. The measurements are sensitive to the conductivity of the solution. Therefore, a conductivity sensor is coupled to the Memosens system.
[0069] The operational regimes used during the experimental tests described below are chosen in order to obtain the desired oxygen content levels in a bench scale test, for a relevant proof-of-concept, and are not optimized for direct industrial application.
Example 1
[0070] The solvent circulation flowrate was kept at 5.4 kg/h. The synthetic exhaust gas flowrate was 0.2 kg/h. The obtained rich solvent solution contained 3.1 mg/L of oxygen. By using nitrogen on the filtrate side of the membrane as oxygen-lean gas, with a flowrate of 5 L/h, the oxygen content was reduced to 0.45 mg/L, which is equivalent to a reduction of 85.6%.
Example 2
[0071] The solvent circulation flowrate was kept at 5 kg/h. The synthetic exhaust gas flowrate was 0.3 kg/h. The obtained rich solvent solution contained 1.9 mg/L of oxygen. By using nitrogen on the filtrate side of the membrane as oxygen-lean gas, with a flowrate of 5 L/h, the oxygen content was reduced to below detection limit, which is 4 g/L.
Example 3
[0072] The solvent circulation flowrate was kept at 5.6 kg/h. The synthetic exhaust gas flowrate was 0.5 kg/h. The obtained rich solvent solution contained 1.6 mg/L of oxygen. By using nitrogen on the filtrate side of the membrane as oxygen-lean gas, with a flowrate of 1 L/h, the oxygen content was reduced to below detection limit, which is 4 g/L.
Example 4
[0073] The solvent circulation flowrate was kept at 5.6 kg/h. The synthetic exhaust gas flowrate was 0.5 kg/h. The obtained rich solvent solution contains 1.6 mg/L of oxygen. By using CO.sub.2 on the filtrate side of the membrane as oxygen-lean gas, with a flowrate of 1 L/h, the oxygen content was reduced to below detection limit, which is 4 g/L. Therefore, the results of operating with nitrogen (example 3) and CO.sub.2 as a sweep gas are comparable.
Example 5
[0074] The solvent circulation flowrate was kept at 5.6 kg/h. The synthetic exhaust gas flowrate was 0.5 kg/h. The obtained rich solvent solution contained 1.6 mg/L of oxygen. By using nitrogen on the filtrate side of the membrane as oxygen-lean gas, with a flowrate of 1 L/h, the oxygen content was reduced to below detection limit, which is 4 g/L.
Example 6
[0075] The solvent circulation flowrate was kept at 8.6 kg/h. The synthetic exhaust gas flowrate was 0.2 kg/h. The obtained rich solvent solution contained 3.3 mg/L of oxygen. By using a liquid scavenger (0.8M aqueous solution of sodium sulfite with cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate as a catalyst) on the filtrate side of the membrane, with a flowrate of 1 L/h, the oxygen content was reduced to 0.9 mg/L, which is equivalent to a reduction of 73%.