ANTIGENIC TRIPEPTIDES DERIVED FROM MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS S-TYPE STRAINS, DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF
20230046953 · 2023-02-16
Inventors
- John P. Bannantine (Ames, IA)
- Gilles ETIENNE (Toulouse, FR)
- Sylvie Bay (Paris, FR)
- Franck BIET (Notre Dame D'Oe, FR)
Cpc classification
G01N2469/20
PHYSICS
C12Q2537/143
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K47/542
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01N2560/00
PHYSICS
G01N33/92
PHYSICS
C12Q2537/143
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K47/60
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K47/60
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The present invention is directed to an isolated synthetic tripeptide of formula H-D-Phe-N-Methyl-L-Val-L-Ala-OMe (SEQ ID NO:1), or a derivative thereof, and to the corresponding lipotripeptides, which are specific to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map)S-type strain, as well as derivatives and conjugates thereof. The invention also concerns the use of these antigens in different methods and tests for detecting Map infection, especially by detecting humoral response and cell mediated response of infected animals. The invention is also directed to a genetic signature of Map and a mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy signature of Map presence or infection.
Claims
1. A method for genetically discriminating between a Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map)C-type and S-type in a sample, comprising detecting a 6.3 kb deletion in the msp1 gene of Map S-type with respect to the msp1 gene of Map C-type.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sample is a sample of blood, serum, faeces, milk, lymph nodes, gut biopsies or urine.
3. A method for genetically characterizing a tested bacterium as a Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map)S-type or for detecting the presence of Map S-strain in a sample, comprising: a) amplifying the genomic DNA of the tested mycobacterium with the following primers: TABLE-US-00007 forward primer P1 (SEQ ID NO: 10) GTGCAGTACGCCGACTACAC and reverse primer P3 (SEQ ID NO: 12) ACCGGGAAAACAGCAGTG; and b) detecting an amplified product having a length comprised between 1000 and 1224 bases.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the amplified product has a length of about 1112 bases.
5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the amplification step is carried out by PCR.
6. The method according to claim 3, wherein the sample is a sample of blood, serum, faeces, milk, lymph nodes, gut biopsies or urine.
7. The method according to claim 4, wherein the sample is a sample of blood, serum, faeces, milk, lymph nodes, gut biopsies or urine.
8. The method according to claim 5, wherein the sample is a sample of blood, serum, faeces, milk, lymph nodes, gut biopsies or urine.
9. A method for genetically discriminating between a Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map)C-type and S-type, comprising: a) amplifying the genomic DNA of a mycobacterium with the following primers: TABLE-US-00008 forward primer P1 (SEQ ID NO: 10) GTGCAGTACGCCGACTACAC, reverse primer P2: (SEQ ID NO: 11) AGAAACCGATCAGCTCGTCG, and reverse primer P3 (SEQ ID NO : 12) ACCGGGAAAACAGCAGTG; and b) detecting an amplified product; wherein an amplified product of a length comprised between 320 and 392 is indicative of C-type and an amplified product of a length comprised between 1000 and 1224 bases is indicative of S-type.
10. The method according to claim 6, wherein the amplified product indicative of S-type has a length of about 1112 bases.
11. The method according to claim 6, wherein the amplified product indicative of C-type has a length of about 356 bases.
12. The method according to claim 9, wherein the amplification step is carried out by PCR.
13. The method according to claim 10, wherein the amplification step is carried out by PCR.
14. The method according to claim 11, wherein the amplification step is carried out by PCR.
Description
LEGEND OF THE FIGURES
[0146]
[0147]
[0148]
[0149]
[0150]
[0151]
[0152] The alignment statistics give 98% of identities (4175/4275), 98% of positives (4218/4275) and 0.7% of gaps (3/4275).
[0153]
[0154]
[0155]
[0156]
[0157] MAP+: Sera from bovine infected by Map and 53; Controls: sera from healthy bovine
[0158]
[0159]
[0160]
[0161]
[0162]
[0163]
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Identification of Cell Wall Peptidolipid of M. avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis (Map) Ovine Strain (S-Type)
[0164] Mycobacteria have a complex cell wall structure that includes many lipids; however, even within a single subspecies of Mycobacterium avium these lipids can differ. Total lipids from an M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map) ovine strain (S-type) contained no identifiable glycopeptidolipids or lipopentapeptide, yet both lipids are present in other M. avium subspecies. The inventors determined the genetic and phenotypic basis for this difference using sequence analysis as well as biochemical and physico-chemical approaches. This strategy showed that a nonribosomal peptide synthase, encoded by mps1, contains three amino acid specifying modules in all ovine strains analyzed, compared to five modules in bovine strains (C-type). Sequence analysis predicted these modules would produce the tripeptide Phe-N-Methyl-Val-Ala with a lipid moiety, termed lipotripeptide (L3P). Comprehensive physico-chemical analysis of Map S397 extracts confirmed the structural formula of the native L3P as D-Phe-N-Methyl-L-Val-L-Ala-OMe attached in N-ter to a 20-carbon fatty acid chain. These data demonstrate that Map S-type strains, which are more adapted in sheep, produce a unique lipid. Implications for these lipid differences may include patho-evolution toward host specificity and disease presentation.
[0165] Introduction:
[0166] Map is considered as a genetically homogenous subspecies of M. avium, especially among bovine, human and wildlife isolates (Wu et al., 2006). However, two primary lineages have emerged following extensive phylogenetic analyses and comparative genomic studies (Biet et al., 2012). These lineages are classified as type I/III or S-type (ovine) and type II or C-type (bovine) strains. Map appears to have emerged from the common ancestor, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, to yield these two lineages. The Map C-type was first isolated from cattle and is the most commonly isolated type, while the Map S-type are typically isolated from sheep and are less prevalent. The S-type isolates are readily distinguishable from C-type isolates based on genome sequencing studies (Li et al., 2005, Bannantine et al., 2012). But these two lineages can also be readily discriminated by genotyping methods due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (Marsh et al., 1999) as well as deletions/insertions of large DNA segments (termed large sequence polymorphisms or LSP) using phylogenetic techniques such as variable number tandem repeats (Lefrancois et al., 2013), single sequence repeats (Amonsin et al., 2004, Thibault et al., 2008), representational difference analysis (Dohmann et al., 2003) and hsp65 sequencing (Turenne et al., 2006). Furthermore, genomic hybridization of S-type strains on a C-type microarray revealed a large 23-gene deletion in S-type strains (Marsh et al., 2006). However, in no case has a genetic difference been linked to a phenotypic difference between C- and S-type strains, until this study.
[0167] In addition to the genotypic distinctions between S- and C-type strains, phenotypic differences involving growth characteristics have been noted since the middle of the last century. The S-type strains are more fastidious and have slower growth rates in laboratory media than C-type strains. In contrast to C-type, the S-type strains do not grow readily on Herold's egg yolk media or Middlebrook 7H9 media that is not supplemented with egg yolk (Whittington et al., 2011). Nutrient limitation will kill S-type strains but it is only bacteriostatic for C-type (Gumber et al., 2009). Motiwala and coworkers have shown transcriptional changes in human macrophages infected with C-type, human and bison isolates, which induce an anti-inflammatory gene expression pattern, while the Map S-type isolates showed expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Motiwala et al., 2006), (Stevenson et al., 2002, Biet et al., 2012). Furthermore, many of the S-type strains are pigmented while C-type strains are not. On the transcriptional level, C- and S-type strains exposed to low iron or heat stress conditions had different mRNA expression patterns (Gumber & Whittington, 2009). Furthermore, iron storage in low iron conditions was only observed in the C-type but not S-type strains (Janagama et al., 2009) and virulence adhesin differences were characterized (Lefrancois et al., 2013). In this study, differences in a lipopeptide that is a component of the mycobacterial cell envelope were identified between C- and S-type strains.
[0168] Non-ribosomally synthesized peptides include a diverse class of important metabolites such as antibiotics. Nonribosomal peptides (NRP) are usually 3-10 amino acids in length and are synthesized by large multi-modular enzymes called non-ribosomal-peptide synthetases (NRPSs). These peptides are not assembled by ribosome, but rather are RNA template and ribosomal independent to allow for maximum biological flexibility by incorporating many unique amino acids. Although 10% of bacterial NRPS genes are non-modular (Wang et al., 2014), most have a modular organization where each module specifies the sequential addition of an amino acid. Several kilobases of DNA are needed for each module that consists of three domains termed the adenylation domain, peptidyl carrier domain and condensation domain. The adenylation domain binds ATP, selects its cognate amino acid building block and performs substrate acyl adenylation. Amino acid translocation occurs with the peptidyl carrier domain. The largest NRPS yet discovered is from Photorhabdus luminescens (WP_011146892; 16,367 aa) and contains 15 modules (Wang et al., 2014). This may represent the upper limit of NRPSs. In Map the mps1 gene encodes a NRPS with five modules that have been previously shown to be involved in production of the pentapeptidic moiety of the lipopentapeptide (L5P) (Biet et al., 2008).
[0169] The objective of this study was to identify the composition of lipopeptides in the S-type strains of Map and determine if they are different from the C-type strains.
[0170] Genetic characterization allowed the inventors to predict the production of different lipopeptide components, depending on the strain type. Synthesis of the predicted S-type lipopeptide together with thorough biochemical and physico-chemical analyses demonstrated that typical lipopeptides from Map are different in S-type (lipotripeptide) and C-type strains (lipopentapeptide). Overall, the inventors reveal key elements of Map cell wall change, involving genes and lipopeptides, occurring on the patho-evolution of the subspecies paratuberculosis.
[0171] Results:
[0172] The lipid composition differs between C- and S-type strains of Map. A panel of genetically diverse Map strains isolated from different animal species appears similar in their lipid profiles when analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in a single dimension (1-D) (Biet et al., 2008). However, the analysis of extracted lipids from both the S397 and K-10 Map (sequenced strains characteristic of S- and C-type, respectively) revealed a striking difference by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Only the C-type strain showed a major peak at a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 940 atomic mass units (amu) (
[0173] The mps1 gene is different between C- and S-type strains. A comparative genomic study was performed to determine the genetic basis for the absence of L5P in S397. While approximately 28 genes are necessary for GPL biosynthesis (Ripoll et al., 2007), the peptide core of L5P in Map is assembled by the product of a single nrps gene, termed mps1 (Biet et al., 2008). The mps1 gene of Map K-10 is also known by the locus tag MAP_1420 and has a size of 19.15 kb encoding 6,384 amino acids (Li et al., 2005). This gene is under the control of the LuxR regulator and has shown increased transcription when exposed to cow's milk (Alonso-Hearn et al., 2010). It has been suggested that the pentapeptide moiety is non-ribosomally assembled by the modules encoded in this gene (Eckstein et al., 2006), therefore, it was of interest to examine the homolog in the S-type strain. However, previous de novo whole genome assemblies of the Map S397 genome using the available Roche GS20, Roche FLX (i.e. 454), and Sanger sequence data (Bannantine et al., 2012) were unsuccessful at producing a complete assembly of the mps1 gene due to the large size and the presence of long, highly syntenic repeats in the amino-acid-specifying modules. Therefore two large sequence gaps were present in mps1 in the S-type genome.
[0174] While genome sequencing revealed that the mps1 gene is present in the S-type strain, the question of why that strain does not produce L5P remained unanswered. To address this, additional sequence data were obtained to completely assemble the region containing mps1 in the S397 genome. Surprisingly, the mps1 gene was only 12,822 bp in size compared to 19,148 bp in the K-10 genome, representing a difference of 6,326 bp. Southern blot analysis was used to confirm the 6.3 kb deletion (
[0175] The deletion was further characterized by PCR analysis and tested across multiple strains (Table 1). To verify that the difference in size of the mps1 gene is characteristic of all sheep strains, a PCR to detect this large sequence polymorphism (LSP.sup.mps1) was developed based on the model described by Semret et al. (Semret et al., 2006). From the mps1 locus in K-10, three primers (P1, P2, and P3, forward primer P1 GTGCAGTACGCCGACTACAC (SEQ ID NO:10);reverse primer P2: AGAAACCGATCAGCTCGTCG (SEQ ID NO:11) and reverse primer P3 ACCGGGAAAACAGCAGTG (SEQ ID NO:12) were designed and used in a single reaction to amplify DNA depending on the presence or absence of the 6.3 kb region (
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1 Source of strains or DNA used and their genotyping characterization Type Strain ID Host origin Subtype Country K10 Bovine C II USA S397 Ovine S III USA 235G Ovine S I UK, Shetland M189 Ovine S I UK, Scotland 22G Ovine S III ES, Basque 269OV Ovine S III ES, Basque FO21 Ovine S III ES, Aragon OVICAP16 Caprine S III ES, Andalucia OVICAP34 Ovine S III ES, Basque OVICAP49 Ovine S III ES, Navarra PCR311 Caprine S III ES, Balearic 13 Bovine C II France 20 Bovine C II France 47 Bovine C II France 54 Bovine C II France 64 Bovine C II France 85 Bovine C II France 104 Bovine C II France
[0176] NRPS encoded by mps1 is missing modular domains in the S-type strains. The NRPS of mps1 is modular in its organization such that each module specifies the incorporation of one amino acid in the peptidic moiety of the lipopeptide. It became of interest to examine how the LSP.sup.mps1 deletion might have affected lipopeptide production in the S-type strains. Using bioinformatics (Rottig et al., 2011), the functional modules and domains within each module of the NRPS were identified and this analysis established that the S-type NRPS is composed of 3 modules while the C-type has 5 modules. Furthermore, these analyses have established the nature and the position of the NRPS domains in S-type along with the domains present in C-type but missing in the S-type strain (
[0177] Altogether, the sequence analysis and bioinformatic predictions of NRPS module composition identified the tripeptide Phe-Val-Ala as the antigen backbone. By analogy with the known L5P, the inventors therefore predicted that the S397 strain produces a lipotripeptide, named L3P, bearing the same structural formula as L5P but missing the two amino-acids L-Ile and L-Phe (
[0178] S-Type Strains Produce a Lipid Antigen Identical to the Synthetic Lipotripeptide L3P.
[0179] To determine if S-type Map effectively produces this novel L3P antigen, the L3P molecule was chemically synthesized and compared with the native source of lipid (either the crude or the purified lipid extract from S397).
[0180] The synthetic L3P was obtained by solid-phase peptide synthesis using Fmoc chemistry and purified by chromatography on silica gel. It was then used as a control in a series of physico-chemical comparative analyses to formally identify the S-type lipid antigen.
[0181] Analysis and Purification by TLC
[0182] The analytical 2-dimensional (2-D) TLC of S397 lipid extracts shows a spot, not as prominent as L5P in C-type strains, co-migrating with the synthetic L3P (
[0183] Analysis by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS
[0184] The peak of the synthetic L3P at m/z 680 amu ([M+Na].sup.+ ion) matches that of the native antigen from the S397 strain, whether in the crude extract or in the purified lipids (
[0185] Finally, MS/MS analysis of the L5P parental ion at 940 amu confirmed the assignment of these fragment ions: the [a, b, c] ions were identical between L3P and LSP, and the [x, y, z] ions increased in agreement with the presence of two additional amino acids (Table 2). Collectively, these data are consistent with an identity of structure between the purified native S397 lipid and the synthetic L3P, i.e. a tripeptide sequence Phe-N-Methyl-Val-Ala with a N-ter C20 fatty acid and a C-ter methyl ester.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 2 Ions originating from the fragmentation at the Phe-N-Methyl-Val bond. Antigen L3P L3P L3P L3P L5P Source native synthetic native native synthetic Parental ion (m/z) 680.7 680.7 694.5 708.6 940.7 Fatty acyl chain C20 C20 C21 C22 C20 a2 436.7 436.7 (464.5)* 436.5 x2 (267.3) (267.3) 527.4 b2 464.6 464.6 (478.4) 492.5 (464.5) y2 239.3 239.3 239.3 239.2 499.4 c2 495.7 495.7 523.4 495.5 z2 208.3 208.3 208.2 208.2 468.4 *in brackets: peak of low intensity
[0186] Analysis by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy.
[0187] To confirm the structure of the native antigen, .sup.1H-NMR spectroscopy was performed on the presumed L3P purified from the lipid extract of S397 cells.
[0188] Results of the NMR analysis were in agreement with the structure proposed for the native L3P. .sup.1H-NMR spectra of the purified S397 lipid and the synthetic L3P are overlapping (
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 3 Characteristic 1H NMR data for the native purified L3P The synthetic L3P gives similar data Chemical Peak multiplicity, shift (ppm) Coupling constant Assignment* 0.61 Doublet, J = 6.8 Hz γ-CH.sub.3 Val 0.97 Doublet, J = 6.4 Hz γ-CH.sub.3 Val 1.35 Doublet, J = 7.4 Hz β-CH.sub.3 Ala 2.22 Multiplet β-CH Val 2.92 Singlet N—CH.sub.3 Val 2.95/3.06 2 Doublets of doublet, J = 13.4 Hz β-CH.sub.2 Phe 3.52 Singlet O—CH.sub.3 4.47 Doublet, J = 10.9 Hz α-CH Val 4.50 Pentet α-CH Ala 5.20 Multiplet α-CH Phe 6.08 Doublet, J = 7.9 Hz NH Phe 6.52 Doublet, J = 7.6 Hz NH Ala *The assigned protons are underlined
[0189] The assignments (Table 3) were determined by the .sup.1H-.sup.1H-COSY NMR experiment where typical spin systems were observed for the three amino-acids.
[0190] .sup.1H-NMR spectrum of the purified S397 shows additional peaks in comparison to the synthetic L3P (
[0191] Nevertheless these results, together with the MS data highlighting the presence of L3P, demonstrate that the S397 strain produces a lipid content with, at least, the L3P compound.
[0192] Analysis of the Optical Purity
[0193] Finally, the optical purity of the individual amino acids within the native L3P was determined by gas chromatography coupled to MS after hydrolysis of the lipopeptide in 6N DCI in D.sub.2O.
[0194] The results demonstrated the presence of the enantiomeric forms of D-Phe (91.4%), N-Methyl-L-Val (99.0%) and L-Ala (98.3%) (data not shown). Notably, in the course of this analysis, the identity of the three predicted amino acids was also confirmed based on their retention time and their mass spectra. Overall, the structure proposed for the L3P (
[0195] Lipopeptides are Cell Surface-Exposed
[0196] It has been assumed for a long time that L5P is localized in the cell wall of Map, but to the best of inventors' knowledge this has never been experimentally demonstrated. Analysis by MALDI-TOF MS of the lipids extracted from surface-exposed materials of Map K-10 shown that L5P is localized in the outer-most layers of the cell envelope (
[0197] Similarly, L3P was detected in surface-exposed materials prepared from Map S397 (
[0198] Discussion:
[0199] In the process of characterizing the differences in lipids among C-type and S-type strains of Map, the inventors uncovered a new LSP not previously described. LSPs have been shown to distinguish Map from other M. avium subspecies, including hominissuis and silvaticum. In addition, three S-type-specific LSPs were characterized by genomic hybridization to DNA microarrays (Marsh et al., 2006). While these LSPs usually span several genes and range in size from 4.5 kb to over 65 kb, the LSP reported here is located exclusively within the mps1 gene and spans 6.3 kb of DNA present in C-type strains, but not in any of the S-type strains examined. It is likely that this LSP remained hidden, despite extensive genomic comparison studies, because it is entirely contained within a single gene. This newly discovered LSP now provides an additional target to distinguish S-type from C-type strains of Map.
[0200] Over 10% of the mycobacterial genome is coded for proteins involved in lipid metabolism. Large genes, including mmpL/S, pks and nrp are involved in lipid biosynthesis or transport (Ripoll et al., 2007), but the role of each of these needs to be determined by investigating genetic differences and correlating those to phenotypic differences as has been accomplished for lipooligosaccharides in M. smegmatis. Although numerous genetic differences between C- and S-type Map strains have been reported, the inventors' results represent the first example of a genetic difference that has been phenotypically defined. It had been previously thought that all Map strains produce L5P since only one bovine strain had been evaluated by 2-D TLC (Eckstein et al., 2006) and several other Map strains examined by 1-D TLC (Biet et al., 2008); however, 1-D TLC did not resolve differences due to limits of the technique. The difference in lipid composition was discovered only through extensive biochemical and physicochemical analysis of lipid extracts combined with detailed sequence and assembly of the large and highly repeated mps1 gene in the S-type strain.
[0201] Based on TLC analysis, Map does not produce GPLs but instead contains a lipopeptide molecule (Biet et al., 2008) initially termed Lipopeptide-I (Riviere et al., 1996) and later Para-LP-01 (Eckstein et al., 2006). This nonpolar lipid, most recently termed L5P for lipopentapeptide, is an abundant molecule in Map and is not detected in M. avium subsp. avium (Eckstein et al., 2006). It has been demonstrated that L5P is antigenic in antibody-based tests (Biet et al., 2008, Verdier et al., 2013) with minor cell-mediated immune responses, and can stimulate IFN-γ (Holbert et al., 2015). The inventors further show for the first time that L5P is clearly surface-exposed, i. e. localized in the outer-most layers of the cell envelope. The antigenicity of L3P in the S-type strains has yet to be tested, but as the L3P amino acids are conserved with that of L5P, it is unlikely that L3P will enable the specific detection of S-type Map strains.
[0202] The unique mycobacterial cell wall is important in the physiology of these bacteria and has been studied for its properties on immune stimulation and increased virulence (Howard et al., 2006, Bernut et al., 2014). Considering that L3P shares with L5P and GPLs a cell-envelope surface localization, and depending on the presence/absence of GPLs and lipopeptides described herein for a small subset of closely related mycobacteria, their physiological properties may change greatly depending on the mycobacterial strain and their evolutionary history.
[0203] NRPSs create substantial biological flexibility because no ribosomes or RNA template are needed for peptide assembly. The ribosome recognizes only 20 naturally occurring amino acids for peptide assembly; however, NRPS can specify over 500 amino acids, creating unlimited peptides for highly specialized biological functions (Walsh et al., 2013). In this study the inventors showed that the tripeptide produced in S-type strains consists of only one naturally occurring amino acid, L-Ala, and two that are “non-coded” amino acids. The C-type mps1 has five modules encoding a lipopentapeptide, but there are examples of two NRP genes, arranged in tandem, that together encode a five module NRPS to construct the antibiotic nocardicin A (Gaudelli et al., 2015). Perhaps to further increase diversity in these nonribosomal peptides, known NRPSs can be classified into three groups, linear, iterative and nonlinear. In linear NRPSs, the sequence of the resulting peptide chain is entirely determined by the number and order of the modules. Iterative NRPSs use their modules or domains more than once in the assembly of one single product. Nonlinear NRPSs involve complex scenarios with parallel nonlinear organization of domains and unusual arrangements such as internal cyclisation or incorporation of small soluble molecules. Data from this study show that mps1 for both L3P and L5P NRPSs are linear in organization.
[0204] Could the defined change in peptide length described in this study be enough to account for host preferences in C- and S-type strains of Map? S-type has a substantial host preference for sheep, but not exclusively, since S-type has also recently been isolated from several Arabian camels (Ghosh et al., 2012). However, C-type has a broader host range since it has been isolated from many ruminant species, including goat, deer and bison (Biet et al., 2012, Sibley et al., 2007). Nonetheless, there is a clear host preference or adaptation among these strains. It may be possible that this subtle change in peptide composition could define the growth rates or other phenotypic differences between these types. However, it can be excluded the fact that this NRP is responsible for pigment production reported in the S-type strains (Biet et al., 2012), since the inventors observed that L3P is colorless (data not shown). Regardless, it is clear that both lipopeptides share common epitopes since D-Phe, N-Methyl-L-Val and L-Ala are conserved in both Map types. The two amino acids missing from the S-type strain L3P are L-Ile and L-Phe. Mutational studies will confirm this point.
[0205] Rough and smooth colony appearance among Mycobacterium species is not only attributed to changes in their lipid composition (Wright et al., 1996) but also to virulence and drug resistance (Kansal et al., 1998, Howard et al., 2006). In fact L5P disappears when Map are cultured in cow's milk but is present in high abundance when cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 media (Alonso-Hearn et al., 2010), suggesting that the lipid profile of Map changes significantly when exposed to different environments. But there may be much more going on biologically that accounts for these lipid differences. Only recently were lipopeptides shown to interact with TLR2 receptors on key immune cells (Jimenez-Dalmaroni et al., 2015). Much research is still needed in this area to understand the biological significance of subtle lipid changes among mycobacterial species and isolates.
[0206] Materials and Methods:
[0207] Culture of S-type Map. S397 is an S-type strain of Map that has been previously characterized by whole genome sequencing (Bannantine et al., 2012). It was initially isolated from a Suffolk breed of sheep in Iowa in 2004. Both strains S397 and K-10 were cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 media (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif.) supplemented with 10% OADC, 0.05% TWEEN 80 (Polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate) and 2 μg/mL Mycobactin J. The culture conditions were 37° C. with no shaking in 2-liter Erlenmeyer flasks each containing 500-mL volumes of media. Milligram quantities were obtained from multiple cultures for downstream analyses.
[0208] Sequencing and assembly of mps1. A combination of sequencing and assembly strategies were required to fully assemble the mps1 gene from Map S397. The large size of this gene and the presence of long repeats resulted in incomplete mps1 assembly regardless of the assembler employed (MIRA v. 3.9.9, Roche gsAssembler v. 2.6, and Velvet v. 0.7.09). Targeted de novo subassemblies of the mps1 region were created by first extracting reads that mapped to the region via MIRA's mirabait functionality using the partial contigs that aligned with MAP_1420 from K-10 and the MAP4_2425 homolog (Bannantine et al., 2014) as targets, and then de novo assembling those reads with MIRA. This was done in an iterative fashion and was supplemented as needed with additional targeted subcloning, PCR, and Sanger sequencing of the mps1 gene region until full unambiguous assembly was obtained. The GenBank accession number for mps1 in Map S397 is KP720596.
[0209] Southern hybridization analysis. Mycobacteria were grown to late log phase in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (10 mL) and harvested by centrifugation at 6,000×g for 10 min. The bacteria were heat killed for 10 min at 95° C. The pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 1 mM EDTA) and centrifuged again at 6,000×g for 10 min. The semidried mycobacterial pellet was resuspended into 1 mL TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 1 mM EDTA). After the addition of 200 μL of lysozyme (200 mg/mL) and incubation overnight at 37° C., 100 μL of SDS 10% and 50 μL Proteinase K (Macherey-Nagel) were added and incubated 4 hours at 56° C. 100 μL of 10% CTAB were mixed and incubated for 1 h at 65° C. 1 volume of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1 (vol/vol)) was added and the solution was vigorously mixed and then centrifuged at 14,000×g for 5 min in phase lock gel (Qiagen). The supernatant was mixed with 1 volume of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1 (vol/vol)) and centrifuged again. The DNA was precipitated by the addition of 0.8 volume of isopropanol and 0.3 M sodium acetate (final concentration). After centrifugation for 30 min at 14,000×g, the DNA was air dried, dissolved in 50 μL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 1 mM EDTA), and stored at −20° C. until further use.
[0210] Southern blot of Map DNA was performed as previously described (Southern, 1975, van Soolingen et al., 1994) with some modifications. The mps1 DNA probe was prepared by PCR amplification of a 491-bp fragment sequence specific for Map using the primers described in this study (table 4). PCRs were performed starting from 10 ng of chromosomal DNA of Map strain K-10 by using a TC-512 thermal cycler (Techne). The PCR product was purified on Macherey-Nagel spin columns according to the manufacturer's instructions. The probe was biotin labeled with the NEBlot Phototope kit (New England Biolabs) by following the instructions of the manufacturer. Digestion was performed with 3 μg of DNA prepared as described above and 7 U of Sacl (Promega) at 37° C. for at least 6 h. Fragments were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred onto lmmobilon-S nylon membranes (Millipore) by vacuum transfer with the Vacu-Gene system (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology). Detection of DNA fragments hybridizing with the biotinylated probe was performed with the Phototope-Star detection kit for nucleic acids (New England Biolabs), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 2-Log DNA Ladder (New England Biolabs) was used as a molecular size marker.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 4 primer sequences: Primer 1: forward primer; primers 2 and 3: reverse primers: Target: MIRU 292 Primer 1: CTTGAGCAGCTCGTAAAGCGT (SEQ ID NO: 18)- Primer 2: GCTGTATGAGGAAGTCTATTCATGG (SEQ ID NO: 19) Target MIRU X3 Primer 1: AACGAGAGGAAGAACTAAGCCG (SEQ ID NO: 20)- Primer 2: TTACGGAGCAGGAAGGCCAGCGGG (SEQ ID NO: 21) target: VNTR 25 Primer 1: GTCAAGGGATCGGCGAGG (SEQ ID NO: 22)- Primer 2: TGGACTTGAGCACGGTCAT (SEQ ID NO: 23) target: VNTR 47 Primer 1: CGTTGCGATTTCTGCGTAGC (SEQ ID NO: 24)- Primer 2: GGTGATGGTCGTGGTCATCC (SEQ ID NO: 25) target: VNTR 3 Primer 1: CATATCTGGCATGGCTCCAG (SEQ ID NO: 26)- Primer 2: ATCGTGTTGACCCCAAAGAAAT (SEQ ID NO: 27) target: VNTR 7 Primer 1: ACAACGAAACCTACCTCGTC (SEQ ID NO: 28)- Primer 2: GTGAGCTGGCGGCCTAAC (SEQ ID NO: 29) target: VNTR 10 Primer 1: GACGAGCAGCTGTCCGAG (SEQ ID NO: 30)- Primer 2: GAGAGCGTGGCCATCGAG (SEQ ID NO: 31) target: VNTR 32 Primer 1: CCACAGGGTTTTTGGTGAAG (SEQ ID NO: 32)- Primer 2: GGAAATCCAACAGCAAGGAC (SEQ ID NO: 33) target: msp1 probe Primer 1: CGCGGCGAGCGGGAGCTGGTGC (SEQ ID NO: 34)- Primer 2: CGCAGCGGGGAGCGCCGGTCGG (SEQ ID NO: 35) target: LSP mps1 Primer 1: GCAGTACGCCGACTACAC (nt 3-20 of SEQ ID NO: 10)- Primer 2: AGAAACCGATCAGCTCGTCG (SEQ ID NO: 11) Primer 3: ACCGGGAAAACAGCAGTG (SEQ ID NO: 12) target: LSP A 20 Primer 1: GGCGTTACAGAATTGCCTTG (SEQ ID NO: 36)- Primer 2: GCTCGAAGTTGGAGATCAGG (SEQ ID NO: 37) Primer 3: GTACGTGGTGACCAATGTCG (SEQ ID NO: 38) target: LSP A 4-II Primer 1: TAGAAGGTGCGGGAAAGTTG (SEQ ID NO: 39)- Primer 2: GTCTATCTGGCGGTGCTCTC (SEQ ID NO: 40) Primer 3: GTCGAAGCAGCGTTGATTG (SEQ ID NO: 41) target: GyrA locus 34 Primer 1: TGTTCTTCACCACCCAGGGCCGGG (SEQ ID NO: 42)- Primer 2: TTGAGCGACAGCAGGTAGTCGTCGGCG (SEQ ID NO: 43) target: GyrB locus 45 Primer 1: TTGGTGCGCCGCAAGAGCGCAACCG (SEQ ID NO: 44)- Primer 2: ATTTCAGCTTGTACAGCGGTGGC (SEQ ID NO: 45) Reference : Thibault, et al (2007) Semret et al. (2006) and Castellanos et al. (2007)
[0211] Reaction conditions for LSP.sup.mps1 amplification. A panel of Map isolates described in Table 1 was tested for the presence or absence of the large sequences identified within the genes mps1 of K-10 compared to S397. This was done with a multiplex PCR approach (Semret et al., 2006) using a set of three primers: two primers (forward and reverse) designed towards the flanking regions (bridging primers) of the LSP and a third primer designed to recognize a sequence internal to the LSP (internal primer). The primers were designed such that the resulting PCR products would be of different sizes depending on the presence or absence of the LSP under study. Primer sequences are provided in Table 4. The PCR mixture comprised 2 μL of DNA solution added to a final volume of 25 μL containing 0.1 μL of GoTaq Flexi DNA polymerase (5 U/μL Promega), 2 mM (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP (Promega); 5 μL of 5× PCR buffer supplied by the manufacturer; 1 μM of each primers; 1 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma); 1.5 mM of MgCl.sub.2 and 5 μL of 5M betaine solution (Sigma). The reactions were carried out using a TC-512 thermal cycler (Techne). PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 5 min at 94° C.; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94° C., 30 s at 62° C., and 30 s at 72° C.; and 1 cycle of 7 min at 72° C. To detect presence or absence of each LSP, PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis using 1.5% agarose gels.
[0212] Bioinformatic prediction of peptide composition from NRPS sequence. The peptide composition of the lipopeptides analyzed in this study were deduced from DNA sequence comparisons between K-10 and S397 strains as well as a bioinformatics approach using domain prediction software including the NCBI web tools ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb. cgi and the web site of PKS/NRPS Analysis at nrps. igs. umaryland. edu/nrps. Peptide composition was determined using the web-based server NRPSpredictor2 (Rottig et al., 2011).
[0213] Chemical synthesis of the lipopeptides. The control lipopeptides (L3P and L5P) were synthesized on solid phase using the standard Fmoc chemistry protocol, as previously described (Biet et al., 2008). After cleavage from the resin, the crude L3P product was purified on a silica gel column using CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2/methanol as eluent (from 98:2 to 97:3 (vol/vol)), and 80 mg of the lipopeptide were obtained (yield 80% based on the net peptide content). The synthetic L3P was characterized by electrospray ionization MS (Q-Tof Micro Waters), quantitative amino acid analysis (AAA) (after hydrolysis with 6N HCl at 110° C. for 48 h and using a Beckman 6300 analyzer) and NMR (Bruker 400 MHz instrument).
[0214] MS: C.sub.39H.sub.67N.sub.3O.sub.5 (calcd 657.5081) m/z 658.5155 [M+H].sup.+, 680.4994 [M+Na].sup.+.
[0215] AAA: Ala 1 (1), Phe 0.96 (1), and an extra peak typical of N-Methyl-Val.
[0216] .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3): δ 0.60 (d, 3H, CHβ Val, J=6.68 Hz), 0.90 (t, 3H, CH.sub.3 lipid, J=7.05 Hz), 0.96 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3γ Val, J=6.41 Hz), 1.25-1.29 (m, 32H, 16 CH.sub.2 lipid), 1.35 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3β Ala, J=7.21 Hz), 1.53-1.59 (m, 2H, CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CO lipid), 2.15 (t, 3H, CH.sub.2CO lipid, J=7.60 Hz), 2.18-2.27 (m, 1H, CH.sub.2β Val), 2.93 (s, 3H, NCH.sub.3), 2.97 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe, J.sub.1CH2β,CHα=8.16 Hz), 3.08 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe, J.sub.1CH2β,CHα=8.04 Hz J.sub.1CH2β,1CH2β=13.36 Hz), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH.sub.3), 4.45 (d, 1H, CHα Val, J=11.04 Hz), 4.5 (p, 1H, CHα Ala, J.sub.CHα,NH=7.2 Hz), 5.17-5.24 (dt, 1H, CHα Phe, J.sub.CHα,NH=6.09 Hz), 6.13 (bd, 1H, NH Phe), 6.59 (bd, 1H, NH Ala), 7.18-7.30 (5H, Ph).
[0217] .sup.13C NMR (CDCl.sub.3): δ 14.08 (CH.sub.3 lipid), 17.86 (CH.sub.3β Ala), 18.64, 19.65 (CH.sub.3γ Val), 22.67 (CH.sub.2 lipid), 25.53 (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CO lipid), 25.84 (CHβ Val), 29.21, 29.34, 29.45, 29.64, 29.68 (CH.sub.2 lipid), 30.96 (NCH.sub.3), 31.91 (CH.sub.2 lipid), 36.44 (CH.sub.2CO lipid), 38.97 (CH.sub.2β Phe), 47.89 (CHα Ala), 50.38 (CHα Phe), 52.28 (OCH.sub.3), 63.12 (CHα Val), 127.11, 128.57, 129.33, 135.80 (Ph), 169.05 (CO Val), 172.55 (CO lipid), 172.94 (CO Ala), 173.41 (CO Phe).
[0218] Lipid extraction, 2-D TLC and 1-D TLC. The culture of the S-type strain of Map afforded 317 mg of cells (dry weight). Lipids were extracted with chloroform/methanol (1:2 then 2:1 (vol/vol)) resulting in 7.6 mg of product. For analytical purposes, 500 μg of this crude extract were loaded on 2-D TLC plates and eluted using chloroform/methanol (96:4 (vol/vol)) in the first dimension followed by toluene/acetone (80:20 (vol/vol)) in the second dimension. Control synthetic L3P was deposited at 15 μg in chloroform and served as a marker for each dimension. TLC plates were revealed by spraying 10% copper sulfate in 8% phosphoric acid, followed by charring.
[0219] For the L3P purification, 7 mg of the crude extract in 100 μL of CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 were loaded on preparative silica gel 60 F.sub.254 2-D TLC (20×20 cm, thickness 0.5 mm) (Merck) and eluted using the same solvent systems as above. After scraping the spot of interest (˜7 mm diameter) off the silica plate, the L3P was eluted in batch with 4 times 500 μL of CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2/methanol 95:5 (vol/vol). The evaporation under argon afforded approximately 50 μg of purified native antigen. The adjacent silica gel zone below (˜6 mm diameter spot) was treated using the same procedure for the NMR control. This purified native L3P was analyzed by silica gel 60 F.sub.254 1-D TLC in comparison to both synthetic controls L3P and L5P (approximately 2 μg of each). The TLC was eluted with CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2/methanol 95:5 (vol/vol) and revealed as described above.
[0220] Surface-exposed material preparation. The surface-exposed material was recovered from mycobacteria treated with 10 g of glass beads as previously described (Ortalo-Magne et al., 1996). Chloroform and methanol were added to the filtrates derived from this treatment obtain a partition mixture composed of chloroform/methanol/water (3:4:3 (vol/vol/vol)), then the organic phases were washed with water and evaporated to dryness to yield the cell surface-exposed lipids. The treated bacteria were extracted as described above to yield the cell bound lipids. Presence of cord factor was monitored by TLC developed in chloroform/methanol (90:10 (vol/vol)) and revelation by spraying 0.2% anthrone in sulfuric acid, followed by charring.
[0221] Analytical Procedures.
[0222] MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and MS/MS analyses were conducted in the positive ionization and reflectron mode by accumulating 10 spectra of 250 laser shots, using the 5800 MALDI TOF/TOF Analyser (Applied Biosystems/Absciex) equipped with a Nd:Yag laser (349 nm wavelength). For MS and MS/MS data acquisitions, uniform, continuous, and random stage motion was selected at a fixed laser intensity of 4000 (instrument-specific units) and 400 Hz pulse rate and 6000 (instrument-specific units) and 1000 Hz, respectively. For MS/MS data acquisition, the fragmentation of selected precursors ions was performed at a collision energy of 1 kV using air as collision gas. Lipid samples were dissolved in chloroform and were directly spotted onto the target plate as 0.5 μl droplets, followed by the addition of 0.5 μL of matrix solution (10 mg of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich).mL.sup.−1 in CHCl.sub.3/CH.sub.3OH, 1:1 (vol/vol)). Samples were allowed to crystallize at room temperature. Spectra were externally calibrated using lipid standards.
[0223] For comparative NMR analyses, 1-D .sup.1H and .sup.1H—COSY .sup.1H/.sup.1H (COrrelation SpectroscopY), compounds were dissolved in CDCl.sub.3/CD.sub.3OD (1:1 (vol/vol), 99.8% purity, Euriso-top, CEA Saclay, France). Experiments were conducted using a 600 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer equipped with cryosonde. .sup.1H chemical shifts are given in parts/million (ppm) downfield from internal tetramethylsilane at 0 ppm. All experiments were recorded at 295° K without sample spinning. The Bruker pulse programs were used and optimized (pulse lengths and delays) for each 1-D or 2-D experiments. Data were analyzed using the TopSpin (Bruker BioSpin) software.
Example 2: Serological Results Using L5P Hydrosoluble Analogue and L3P to Detect Map
[0224] Materials and Methods: [0225] 1. Material and Methods
[0226] a. Chemical Synthesis of the Antigens.
[0227] The antigens were synthesized manually on solid phase using Fmoc chemistry.
[0228] The L3P lipopeptide was prepared using a 4-hydroxymethylbenzoyl resin (HMBA-AM resin, Novabiochem) as previously described (Biet et al., 2008). After cleavage from the resin, the crude L3P was purified on a silica gel column using CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2/methanol as eluent (from 98/2 to 97/3 v/v), and 80 mg of the lipopeptide were obtained (yield 80%).
[0229] The L5P.sup.H2O antigen was prepared by attaching N-(Fmoc-13-amino-4,7,10-trioxa-tridecayl)-diglycolic acid (Novabiochem) to a Wang resin using 1-(mesitylene-2-sulfonyl)-3-nitro-1,2,4-triazole and N-methylimidazole (B. Blankemeyer-Menge et al., 1990). The capping, coupling and deprotection steps were performed as previously described (Biet et al., 2008).
[0230] The product was cleaved from the resin with aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)/triisopropylsilane/H.sub.2O 95/2.5/2.5 v/v/v for 2 hours at room temperature. After filtration of the resin, the filtrate was concentrated, and diluted with CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2/H.sub.2O 50/50. The organic phase was extracted twice with H.sub.2O. The aqueous phases were pooled and lyophilized. The crude L5P.sup.H2O was purified by reverse-phase flash chromatography using a gradient of H.sub.2O+0.1% TFA/CH.sub.3CN+0.1% TFA from 70/30 to 50/50 and 126 mg of the peptide derivative were obtained (yield 88%).
[0231] The purified compounds L3P and L5P.sup.H2O were characterized by electrospray ionization MS (Q-Tof Micro Waters), quantitative amino acid analysis (AAA) (after hydrolysis with 6N HCl at 110° C. for 48 h and using a Beckman 6300 analyzer) and NMR (Bruker 400 MHz instrument).
[0232] L3P:
[0233] MS: C.sub.39H.sub.67N.sub.3O.sub.5 (calcd 657.5081) m/z 658.5155 [M+H].sup.+, 680.4994 [M+Na].sup.+.
[0234] AAA: Ala 1 (1), Phe 0.96 (1), and an extra peak typical of N-Methyl-Val.
[0235] .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3): δ 0.60 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3γ Val, J=6.68 Hz), 0.90 (t, 3H, CH.sub.3 lipid, J=7.05 Hz), 0.96 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3 γ Val, J=6.41 Hz), 1.25-1.29 (m, 32H, 16 CH.sub.2 lipid), 1.35 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3β Ala, J=7.21 Hz), 1.53-1.59 (m, 2H, CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CO lipid), 2.15 (t, 3H, CH.sub.2CO lipid, J=7.60 Hz), 2.18-2.27 (m, 1H, CHβ Val), 2.93 (s, 3H, NCH.sub.3), 2.97 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe, J.sub.1CH2β,CHα=8.16 Hz), 3.08 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe, J.sub.1CH2β,CHα=8.04 Hz J.sub.1CH2β,CHβ=13.36 Hz), 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH.sub.3), 4.45 (d, 1H, CHα Val, J=11.04 Hz), 4.5 (p, 1H, CHα Ala, J.sub.CHα,NH=7.2 Hz), 5.17-5.24 (dt, 1H, CHα Phe, J.sub.CHα,NH=6.09 Hz), 6.13 (bd, 1H, NH Phe), 6.59 (bd, 1H, NH Ala), 7.18-7.30 (5H, Ph).
[0236] .sup.13C NMR (CDCl.sub.3): 14.08 (CH.sub.3 lipid), 17.86 (CH.sub.3β Ala), 18.64, 19.65 (CH.sub.3 γ Val), 558 22.67 (CH.sub.2 lipid), 25.53 (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CO lipid), 25.84 (CHβ Val), 29.21, 29.34, 29.45, 29.64, 29.68 (CH.sub.2 lipid), 30.96 (NCH.sub.3), 31.91 (CH.sub.2 lipid), 36.44 (CH.sub.2CO lipid), 38.97 (CH.sub.2β Phe), 47.89 (CHα Ala), 50.38 (CHα Phe), 52.28 (OCH.sub.3), 63.12 (CHα Val), 127.11, 128.57, 129.33, 135.80 (Ph), 169.05 (CO Val), 172.55 (CO lipid), 172.94 (CO Ala), 173.41 (CO Phe).
[0237] L5p.sup.H2O:
[0238] MS: C.sub.47H.sub.73N.sub.7O.sub.12 (calcd 927.5317) m/z 928.5383 [M+H].sup.+, 950.5099 [M+Na].sup.+.
[0239] AAA: Ala 1 (1), Phe 1.79 (2), Ile 0.90 (1), and an extra peak typical of N-Methyl-Val.
[0240] .sup.1H NMR (MeOD): δ 0.68 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3γ Val, J=6.56 Hz), 0.79 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3γ Val, J=6.64 Hz), 0.81 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3γ Ile, J=6.89 Hz), 0.85 (t, 3H, CH.sub.3δ Ile, J=7.38 Hz), 1.01-1.09 (m, 1H, 1CH.sub.2γ Ile), 1.30 (d, 3H, CH.sub.3β Ala, J=7.12 Hz), 1.45-1.51 (m, 1H, 1CH.sub.2γ Ile), 1.70-1.81 (m, 5H, CHβ Ile, CH.sub.2 D and K), 2.08-2.14 (m, 1H, CH.sub.2β Val), 2.92 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe), 3.01 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe), 3.05 (s, 3H, NCH.sub.3), 3.13 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe), 3.20 (dd, 1H, 1CH.sub.2β Phe), 3.23 (t, 2H, CH.sub.2 C or L, J=6.86 Hz), 3.33 (t, 2H, CH.sub.2 C or L, J=6.84 Hz), 3.48-3.54 (m, 4H, CH.sub.2 E and J), 3.56-3.64 (m, 8H, CH.sub.2 F, G, H and I), 4.04 (s, 2H, CH.sub.2 B), 4.06-4.10 (m, 1H, CHα Ile), 4.18 (s, 2H, CH.sub.2 A), 4.23-4.28 (q, 1H, CHα Ala), 4.47 (d, 1H, CHα Val, J=10.96 Hz), 4.61 (dt, 1H, CHα Phe), 4.68 (dt, 1H, CHα Phe), 7.16-7.19 (m, 2H, NH PEG), 7.21-7.38 (m, 10H, 2Ph), 7.97 (d, NH Ile), 8.13 (d, NH Phe).
[0241] .sup.13C NMR (MeOD): δ 11.34 (CH.sub.3γ Ile), 15.75 (CH.sub.3γ Ile), 18.34 (CH.sub.3β Ala), 19.87, 20.00 (2CH.sub.3γ Val), 26.10 (CH.sub.2γ Ile), 28.50 (CHβ Val), 30.35, 30.38 (CH.sub.2 D and K), 32.05 (NCH.sub.3), 37.69, 37.90 (CH.sub.2 C and L), 38.14, 38.61 (2CH.sub.2β Phe), 50.56 (CHα Ala), 53.35, 55.93 (CHα Phe), 59.50 (CHα Ile), 64.94 (CHα Val), 69.22 (CH.sub.2 A), 69.82, 70.11 (CH.sub.2 E and J), 71.28, 71.31, 71.52, 71.58 (CH.sub.2 B, F, G, H, and I), 127.87, 129.08, 129.56, 130.27, 130.35, 130.59, 135.26, 138.28 (Ph), 171.06, 171.92, 172.20, 172.85, 173.25, 173.63, 174.43 (CO).
##STR00001##
[0242] b. Sera
[0243] The potential of L5P and L3P as Map diagnostic antigen was assessed by ELISA. To validate thoroughly the diagnostic value of these molecules with appropriate sample sizes, the inventors used collection of sera already extensively described (Leroy et al, Proteomics 2007) (Mercier et al., Veterinary Record(2010) (Schinköthe Jet al. J Comp Pathol. 2016 Aug-Oct;155(2-3):218-30) (Dukkipati VSVet Microbiol. 2016 Nov. 15; 195:136-143). They also used sera from animals infected by M. bovis form (JL Moyen Laboratoire Départemental d′Analyse & de Recherche de Dordogne).
[0244] c. Antibody ELISA Procedure
[0245] Preparation of antigen solution: The synthetic L5P lyophilized was carefully dissolved with ethanol or methanol. The required volume of ethanol to give a stock concentration of 1 mg/ml was added in the tube. The lyophilisate was then allowed to resuspend for at least 2 hours (gentle stirring). It is recommended to keep the working solution at room temperature taking care to avoid evaporation. L5P was used at a working concentration of 25 μg/mL in ethanol or methanol. 50 μL of antigen preparation were added in each well of the microplate Nunc Maxisorp and incubated for 18 hours at 4° C. with PPD or water-soluble variant. For the L5P coating plate were incubated 18 hours at 37° C. until total methanol evaporation (do not cover the plate). Plates were then washed three times with 200 μL of PBS containing 0.05% TWEEN 20 (Polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate) (PBS-T), and 50 μL Blocking Buffer PBS-TG (PBS-0.05% TWEEN 20 (Polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate), 0.5% Gelatin ref BIO-RAD 170-6537) were added to each well and incubated for 1 hour 30 min at 37° C.
[0246] After removing the blocking buffer 50 μL of primary antibody or serum diluted (1/100) in PBS-TG to each well were added and plates were incubated for 1 hour 30 at 37° C.
[0247] Plates were washed five times with 200 μL of PBS-T, and 50 μL of a solution of Recombinant Protein G Peroxidase Conjugated (reference 31499, Thermo Scientific) diluted at 0.5 μg/mL in PBS 0.05% TWEEN 20 (Polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate) were added to each well and plates were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature.
[0248] Plates were then washed five times with 200 μL of PBS-T, and HRP substrate were added. The plates were read photometrically at 414 nm.
[0249] d. Storage
[0250] Before solubilization, L5P can be conserved at 4° C. or −20° C., and after solubilization at room temperature less than 2 days.
[0251] Results:
[0252] L5P.sup.H2O is a Suitable Hydrosoluble Derivative of LSP:
[0253] The L5P is very hydrophobic and does behave very differently as compared to conventional proteic antigens which are hydrosoluble. It is soluble in DMSO, CHCl.sub.3, CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, MeOH and EtOH (<1 mg/ml), but insoluble in water or aqueous buffers. Glass containers are thus to be used, and contacts with polypropylene/ependorf surface are to be minimized. Material handling like dilution and transfer steps is also to be minimized.
[0254] These properties of L5P are thus likely to cause difficulties in using a diagnostic test based on the L5P as antigen.
[0255] The inventors have thus developed a hydrosoluble derivative of LSP, named L5P.sup.H2O, in order to circumvent these potential difficulties. The structure of L5P and L5P.sup.H2O are illustrated in
[0256] These results confirm that both L5P and L5P.sup.H2O have satisfying performance in the diagnosis of Map infection in bovine.
[0257] The inventors have moreover confirmed that the antibody response detected with sera of infected animals is not directed against the lipid moiety of LSP, as can be deduced from the results illustrated in
[0258] It can thus be concluded that: [0259] L5P is a valuable biomarker to detect animal infected by Map. It was validated in ELISA using collections of sera from cattle. [0260] The ELISA detection relies on the L5P peptide since the lipid moiety does not discriminate control from infected animals [0261] A high quality hydrosoluble L5P derivative was synthesized. [0262] The hydrosoluble antigen L5P.sup.H2O is a satisfying synthetic mimic of L5P and can be advantageously used in a standard ELISA diagnostic test for detecting Map-infected animals.
[0263] L5P is Suitable to Discriminate Animals Infected by Map Versus M. bovis:
[0264] The inventors have then confirmed that L5P is an antigen specific for Map, absent from M. bovis and which does not cross-react with sera of animals infected by M. bovis. The corresponding results are illustrated in
[0265] This antigen can therefore be used to discriminate animals infected with M. bovis from animals infected with Map. The same property is to be expected for the hydrosoluble analogue of L5P.
[0266] L5P is not Optimal as a Diagnostic Antigen in the Context of Ovine Paratuberculosis Induced by Map of S-Type:
[0267] The results illustrated in
[0268] In view of the high number of undetermined diagnoses as illustrated in
[0269] Use of L3P in the Map Serodiagnosis:
[0270] The inventors have then used L3P in Elisa serodiagnosis test, using the same protocol as detailed above for L5P. The results are presented in
[0271] Anti-Map antibodies present in the serum of animals infected with C-type strains cross react with the L3P. These results are not surprising given the structures of the antigens that share epitopes. These results suggest that L3P, together with L5P, could be used for specific diagnosis of sheep (or other animal) infected with strains of type S.
[0272] The L3P will thus improve the serological diagnosis of Map in a context of infection with type S strains. Technical optimization of the ELISA protocol, especially steps of coating and saturation is in progress. The comprehensive evaluation of infected animals with accurately characterized strains is also in progress using a large collection of sera.
[0273] It is to be noted that these results were performed with a limited number of reference sera from bovines infected by C-type strains and sera from ovines infected by S-type strains. They nevertheless show that S-type is detected with L3P as antigen in the ELISA.
Example 3: L3P Promotes a Cell-Mediated Immune Response Whereas L5P Promotes B Cell Responses
[0274] The present inventors have also confirmed that L3P elicits a cell mediated immune response as well as humoral response. By comparison with the immunoreactivity of L5P, they have moreover highlighted differences between L3P and L5P, namely they have demonstrated that there is a dose-dependent effect observed for L3P on upregulation of CD25+ CD8 T cells from infected cows, while L5P effects were static. In contrast, L5P demonstrated a significantly stronger induction of CD25+ B cells from infected animals compared to L3P.
[0275] Methods:
[0276] PBMC Isolation and Stimulation for Flow Cytometry and Cytokine Measurements.
[0277] Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from control non-infected (n=4) and cattle naturally infected with C-type Map (n=4) to determine if lipoproteins, L3P and L5P (structures disclosed in
[0278] PBMCs were resuspended at a final concentration of 8×10.sup.6/ml in complete medium consisting of RPMI-1640 with 2 mM 1-glutamine and 25 mM HEPES (Gibco, Grand Island, N.Y.) and supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco), 100λ penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). Cells were plated in 24-well culture plates and incubated for 24 hr at 39° C. in 5% CO.sub.2 in a humidified atmosphere with the following treatment groups, nonstimulated (NS; negative control), pokeweed mitogen (PWM, 10 μg/ml, positive control; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), and four antigens that included whole cell sonicated extracts of Map strains K-10 and S397 (10 μg/ml); lipoproteins L3P and L5P (1, 5, 10 μg/ml concentrations). The lipoproteins had to be solubilized in 100% methanol to 1 mg/ml concentrations and then diluted in the complete medium to final concentrations indicated above. This diluted solvent-lipopeptide mixture did not affect cell viability or response capabilities. After a 24-hr stimulation, the supernatants were harvested by centrifugation at 400×g for 5 min. Supernatants were removed without disturbing the cells in culture and stored at −20° C. until cytokine measurement. Cytokines IFN-γ, IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6 and TNF-α were all measured using Ciraplex bovine multiplex cytokine arrays (Aushon Biosystems, Billerica, Mass.).
[0279] For flow cytometry, PBMCs were cultured in replicate 48-well flat-bottom plates (Nunc Technologies, Rochester, N.Y.) as described above with the same culture conditions and in vitro treatments. After incubating for either 3 days (NS, PWM) or 6 days (NS, antigens), cell populations were defined by labeling with 50 μl of a cocktail of primary antibodies to CD4, CD8, gamma delta T cell receptor (γδ TCR), and B cells, along with a CD25 activation marker (Washington State University Monoclonal Antibody Center, Pullman, WA). After a 15-min incubation at room temperature (RT), plates were centrifuged for 2 min at 400×g, the supernatant was decanted, and 50 μl of a secondary antibody cocktail was added, which included APC/Cy7 anti-mouse IgG2a (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, Ala.), AF350 anti-mouse IgG2b (Invitrogen, Waltham, Mass.), and BUV395 anti-mouse IgG3 (BDBiosciences, San Diego, Calif.). Live/Dead populations were separated using Zombie Yellow™ Fixable Viability Dye (Biolegend, San Diego, Calif.). Cells were analyzed on a BDBiosciences LSRII Cytometer using FACSDiva V8.0.1 software. Further analysis was done using FlowJo® v10.2 (FLOWJO, LLC) software.
[0280] Results:
[0281] After 24 hr culture, there was a dose-dependent proliferation of CD25+ CD8 T cells from infected cows stimulated with L3P. By contrast, L5P stimulated cells remained static over the range of lipopeptide concentrations (
[0282] In the present study, L5P preferentially resulted in the upregulation of activated B cells (CD25+B cells), a finding that correlates with previous studies demonstrating this lipopentapeptide produces strong humoral responses in cattle and sheep (Biet et al., 2008). In contrast, L3P more distinctly upregulated T cell proliferation (CD25+CD8 T cells) in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting more of a Th1 immune response to this cell wall component. These results suggest that genomic differences between L3P and L5P may translate to antigenic differences that present immunological diversity within the infected host.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
[0283] Alonso-Hearn, M., T. M. et al, (2010). Innate Immun 16: 235-247. [0284] Amonsin, A., L. L. et al, (2004). J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1694-1702. [0285] Bannantine, J. P., et al, (2014). Genome announcements 2. [0286] Bannantine, J. P. et al, (2012). BMC Genomics 13: 89. [0287] Bernut, A., J. L. et al, (2014). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 111: E943-952. [0288] Biet, F. et al, (2008). Vaccine 26: 257-268. [0289] Biet, F. et al, (2012). BMC Microbiol 12: 264. [0290] Blankemeyer-Menge B. et al. Tetrahedron Letters (1990) 31, 1701] [0291] Dohmann, K., B. et al, (2003). J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5215-5223. [0292] Eckstein, T. M., S. et al, (2006). J. Biol. Chem. 281: 5209-5215. [0293] Gaudelli, N. M., D. H. Long & C. A. Townsend, (2015). Nature 520: 383-387. [0294] Ghosh, P., C. et al, (2012). PLoS One 7: e31947. [0295] Gumber, S., D. L. et al, (2009). Vet. Microbiol. 133: 344-357. [0296] Gumber, S. & R. J. Whittington, (2009). Vet. Microbiol. 136: 82-90. [0297] Holbert, S., M. et al, (2015). Res. Vet. Sci. 102: 118-121. [0298] Howard, S. T., E. et al, (2006). Microbiology 152: 1581-1590. [0299] Janagama, H. K. et al, (2009). Microbiology 155: 3683-3690. [0300] Jimenez-Dalmaroni, M. J. et al, (2015). Innate Immun 21: 175-193. [0301] Kansal, R. G., R. Gomez-Flores & R. T. Mehta, (1998). Microb. Pathog. 25: 203-214. [0302] Lefrancois, L. H. et al, (2013). J. Bacteriol. 195: 4844-4853. [0303] Li, L., et al (2005). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 102: 12344-12349. [0304] Marsh, I., et al (1999). Mol. Cell. Probes 13: 115-126. [0305] Marsh, I. B., et al (2006). J. Bacteriol. 188: 2290-2293. [0306] Motiwala, A. S., et al (2006). Infect. Immun. 74: 6046-6056. [0307] NAHMS, (2008) Johne's disease on U.S. dairies, 1991-2007. USDA-APHIS—VS-CEAH Fort Collins, Colo. Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health: 1-4. [0308] Ortalo-Magne, A. et al, (1996). J. Bacteriol. 178: 456-461. [0309] Ripoll, F. et al, (2007). BMC Genomics 8: 114. [0310] Riviere, M. et al, (1996). Eur. J. Biochem. 241: 682-690. [0311] Rottig, M., et al, (2011). Nucleic Acids Res. 39: W362-367. [0312] Semret, M. et al, (2006). J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 881-887. [0313] Sibley, J. A. et al, (2007). J. Wildl. Dis. 43: 775-779. [0314] Southern, E. M., (1975). J. Mol. Biol. 98: 503-517. [0315] Stevenson, K. et al, (2002). J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1798-1804. [0316] Thibault, V. C. et al, (2008). J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 4091-4094. [0317] Turenne, C. Y. et al, (2006). J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 433-440. [0318] van Soolingen, D. et al, (1994). Methods EnzymoL 235: 196-205. [0319] Verdier, J. et al (2013). PLoS One 8: e62780. [0320] Walsh, C. T. et al, (2013). Angewandte Chemie. International Ed. In English 52: 7098-7124. [0321] Wang, H. et al, (2014). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 111: 9259-9264. [0322] Whittington, R. J. et al, (2011). J. Clin. Microbiol. 49: 1822-1830. [0323] Wright, E. L. et al, (1996). J. Clin. Microbiol. 34: 2475-2478. [0324] Wu, C. W. et al, (2006). J. Bacteriol. 188: 711-723.