SYNTHESIS GAS TO HYDROCARBON PROCESSES WITH NEUTRAL OR NEGATIVE CARBON DIOXIDE SELECTIVITY

Abstract

A process for preparing C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons includes introducing a feed stream into a reaction zone of a reactor, the feed stream comprising hydrogen gas and carbon monoxide. An additional stream is introduced into the reaction zone of the reactor, the additional stream comprising carbon dioxide. A combined stream that includes the feed stream and the additional stream is converted into a product stream comprising C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons in the reaction zone in the presence of a hybrid catalyst. The hybrid catalyst includes a mixed metal oxide catalyst component, and a microporous catalyst component. The process operates at a gas hourly space velocity in excess of 2500 hr.sup.-1 and effectively yields a net carbon dioxide selectivity of less than 5.0% and a productivity of C.sub.2-C.sub.4 hydrocarbons greater than 75 g hydrocarbons per kilogram of catalyst per hour.

Claims

1. A process for preparing C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons comprising: introducing a feed stream comprising hydrogen gas and a carbon-containing gas comprising carbon monoxide into a reaction zone of a reactor; introducing a second stream comprising carbon dioxide into the reaction zone of the reaction; forming a combined stream from the feed and second stream; converting the combined stream into a product stream comprising C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons in the reaction zone in the presence of a hybrid catalyst, the hybrid catalyst comprising: a mixed metal oxide catalyst component; and a microporous catalyst component, wherein a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) is at least 2500 hr.sup.-1, a net CO.sub.2 selectivity is less than 5.0%, and a C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbon productivity of at least 75 g hydrocarbon/kg catalyst per hour.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein the second stream comprises up to 80.0 v% CO.sub.2.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein the second stream consists of CO.sub.2.

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the combined stream comprises greater than 6.3 v% CO.sub.2.

5. The process of claim 1, wherein the combined stream comprises 50 v% to 80 v% hydrogen.

6. The process of claim 1, wherein the combined stream comprises a carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2)/carbon monoxide (CO) volume ratio (CO.sub.2/CO) from 0.05 to 1.5 v/v.

7. The process of claim 1, wherein the reaction zone operates at a temperature from 380° C. to 450° C.

8. The process of claim 1, wherein the reaction zone operates at a pressure from 20 bar to 70 bar.

9. The process of claim 1, wherein the GHSV is greater than 4800 hr.sup.-1.

10. The process of claim 1, wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst component comprises ZrO.sub.2.

11. The process of claim 1, wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst component comprises ZrO.sub.2 and Ga.sub.2O.sub.3.

12. The process of claim 1, wherein the microporous catalyst component is a molecular sieve having 8-MR pore openings.

13. The process of claim 1, wherein the microporous catalyst component is SAPO-34.

14. The process of claim 1, wherein the net CO.sub.2 selectivity is less than 1.0%.

15. The process of claim 1, wherein the C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons consist essentially of C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 olefins.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0009] FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating two streams being introduced to a reactor and one resulting product stream exiting the reactor in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0010] FIGS. 2 and 3 graphically depict the thermodynamic relationship between net CO.sub.2 selectivity and CO.sub.x conversion when introducing a second stream comprising CO.sub.2 to the reactor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0011] As used herein, it is noted that “synthesis gas” and “syngas” are utilized herein to represent a mixture comprising primarily hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and very often some carbon dioxide.

[0012] Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of processes utilizing syngas to prepare C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons with a net CO.sub.2 selectivity of less than 5.0% and a productivity of C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons greater than 75 g hydrocarbons per kilogram of catalyst per hour by co-feeding CO.sub.2 and operating at a gas hourly space velocity in excess of 2500 hr.sup.-1. As used herein, net CO.sub.2 selectivity is defined as the CO.sub.2 exiting the reactor less the total CO.sub.2 fed to the reactor. In one embodiment, a process for preparing C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons comprises: introducing a feed stream into a reaction zone of a reactor, the feed stream comprising H.sub.2 gas and CO; introducing an additional stream into the reaction zone of the reactor, the additional stream comprising CO.sub.2; and converting a combined stream comprising the feed stream and the additional stream into a product stream comprising C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons in the reaction zone in the presence of a hybrid catalyst, the hybrid catalyst comprising: a mixed metal oxide catalyst component; and a microporous catalyst component, by operating at a gas hourly space velocity in excess of 2500 hr.sup.-1 , resulting in a net selectivity of CO.sub.2 of less than 5.0% and a productivity of C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons greater than 75 g hydrocarbons per kilogram of catalyst per hour. In some embodiments, the additional stream comprising CO.sub.2 may be a recycle stream.

[0013] The use of an additional feed of CO.sub.2 to reduce net CO.sub.2 selectivity when converting feed streams comprising carbon to desired products, such as, for example, C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons, is known. In general, in syngas to hydrocarbon processes, it is desirable to achieve a high productivity of the desired C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons, while simultaneously reducing the net selectivity of CO.sub.2. A known method to reduce the net selectivity of CO.sub.2 is by co-feeding CO.sub.2. However, by co-feeding additional CO.sub.2 to reduce the net selectivity of CO.sub.2, this also results in a decreased productivity of the desired C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons. However, the present inventors have recognized that by operating the process at a high gas hourly space velocity, for example, in excess of 2500 hr.sup.-1, the additional CO.sub.2, while still reducing net selectivity of CO.sub.2, does not inhibit production of the desired C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons.

[0014] Processes according to embodiments disclosed and described herein address the reduction of the net selectivity of CO.sub.2 by introducing a stream (referred to herein as the “additional stream”) in addition to the feed stream, which may be, for example, syngas, wherein the additional stream comprises CO.sub.2, and operating the process at a high gas hourly space velocity, which may be, for example in excess of 2500 hr.sup.-1. As demonstrated herein, the addition of CO.sub.2 to the process and operating at a gas hourly space velocity in excess of 2500 hr.sup.-1 lowers the net selectivity of CO.sub.2, while maintaining a productivity of C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons greater than 75 g hydrocarbons per kilogram of catalyst per hour. Syngas to hydrocarbon process with neutral or negative CO.sub.2 selectivity according to embodiments will now be described in more detail.

[0015] Referring to the embodiment of FIG. 1, a feed stream 102 is fed into a reaction zone 101, the feed stream 102 may comprise H.sub.2 gas and CO. In embodiments, the feed stream 102 is syngas. In some embodiments, the H.sub.2 gas is present in the feed stream 102 in an amount of from 20 volume percent (vol%) to 80 vol%, based on combined volume of the H.sub.2 gas and CO. In other embodiments, the H.sub.2 gas is present in the feed stream 102 in an amount from 40 vol% to 80 vol% or from 60 vol% to 80 vol%, based on combined volume of H.sub.2 gas and CO. The feed stream 102 is introduced into a reaction zone 101 and contacted with a hybrid catalyst as disclosed and described herein below in the reaction zone 101. The hybrid catalyst comprises a mixed metal oxide catalyst component and a microporous catalyst component.

[0016] Referring again to FIG. 1, an additional stream 103 comprising CO.sub.2 is introduced into the reaction zone 101 with the feed stream 102. In embodiments, the additional stream 103 may be added to the feed stream 102 prior to introducing the feed stream 102 and additional stream 103 into the reaction zone 101, such that a combined stream comprising the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103 are introduced into the reaction zone 101 simultaneously through the same inlet. In other embodiments, the additional stream 103 may be added to the reaction zone 101 through a different inlet than the feed stream 102, such that the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103 are not in contact until both are present in the reaction zone 101. In either of the above-described embodiments, at some point during the syngas to hydrocarbon process both the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103 are present in the reaction zone 101 and are contacted with the hybrid catalyst.

[0017] As disclosed herein above, the combined stream may comprise H.sub.2, CO, CO.sub.2, or combinations thereof. The additional stream 103 is added to the feed stream 102, or introduced into the reaction zone 101 with the feed stream 102, so that the combined stream-comprising the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103—comprises from 10.0 vol% to 90.0 vol% H.sub.2, such as from 10.0 vol% to 80.0 vol% H.sub.2, from 10.0 vol% to 70.0 vol% H.sub.2, from 10.0 vol% to 60.0 vol% H.sub.2, from 10.0 vol% to 50.0 vol% H.sub.2, from 10.0 vol% to 40.0 vol% H.sub.2, or from 10.0 vol% to 30.0 vol% H.sub.2. In other embodiments, the combined stream comprises from 20.0 vol% to 90.0 vol% H.sub.2, such as from 30.0 vol% to y H.sub.2, from 40.0 vol% to 90.0 vol% H.sub.2, from 50.0 vol% to 90.0 vol% H.sub.2, or from 80.0 vol% to 90.0 vol% H.sub.2. Yet in other embodiments, the combined stream comprises from 20.0 vol% to 80.0 vol% H.sub.2, such as from 40.0 vol% to 80.0 vol% H.sub.2, or from 60.0 vol% to 80.0 vol% H.sub.2. In other embodiments, the combined stream comprises from 45.0 vol% to 85.0 vol% H.sub.2, such as from 55.0 vol% to 85.0 vol% H.sub.2 or from 65.0 vol% to 85.0 vol% H.sub.2. In providing a feed stream and an additional stream to yield a combined feed stream having the above H.sub.2 content, the net CO.sub.2 selectivity of the reaction can be controlled so that the process using the additional stream 103 reduces the net CO.sub.2 selectivity.

[0018] In traditional syngas to hydrocarbons conversion processes, CO.sub.2 is at times co-fed to reduce net selectivity of CO.sub.2. Without being bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the reduction in net selectivity of CO.sub.2 is, at least in part, caused by manipulating the Water Gas Shift reaction (WGS) (CO + H.sub.2O ←.fwdarw. CO.sub.2 + H.sub.2). Balancing the reduced net CO.sub.2 selectivity and the reduced CO.sub.x conversion is, in embodiments, achieved by providing a combined stream comprising the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103. However, by co-feeding CO.sub.2, the productivity of the desired C.sub.2-C.sub.4 hydrocarbons is typically reduced compared to when CO.sub.2 is not co-fed. Thus, even though it is known to co-feed CO.sub.2 to reduce the net selectivity of CO.sub.2, the reduced net selectivity of CO.sub.2 also results in lower productivity of C.sub.2-C.sub.4 hydrocarbons. By operating the process at a high space velocity, which is the subject of the present disclosure, co-feeding CO.sub.2 results in reduced net selectivity of CO.sub.2 while maintaining desired productivity of the desired C.sub.2-C.sub.4 hydrocarbons.

[0019] FIGS. 2 and 3 are based on thermodynamic equilibrium calculations and serve to further describe the additional feed of CO.sub.2. FIG. 2 depicts the relationship between net CO.sub.2 selectivity and CO.sub.x conversion at 400° C. in a single-pass syngas to hydrocarbon process. In FIG. 2, the volume ratio of CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2 to CO in the feed stream was equal to three. However, when manipulating the WGS reaction, as depicted in FIG. 3, the relationship between net CO.sub.2 selectivity and CO.sub.x conversion at 400° C. in a single-pass syngas to hydrocarbon process results in both lower net CO.sub.2 selectivity and higher CO.sub.x conversions. For example, in FIG. 3, the 5% CO.sub.2 - 50% approach to equilibrium (ATE) of the WGS reaction line produces a much lower net CO.sub.2 selectivity when compared to the 5% CO.sub.2 - 100% ATE of the WGS reaction line. In FIG. 3, the volume ratio of CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2 to CO in the feed stream was equal to five. When comparing FIGS. 2 and 3, the different volume ratios of CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2 to CO in the feed stream result in the 5% CO.sub.2 lines differing between the two graphs.

[0020] As disclosed herein above, the additional stream 103, which may include a recycle stream 105, may comprise CO.sub.2. It should be understood that the CO.sub.2 introduced in the additional stream 103 is in addition to any CO.sub.2 present in the feed stream 102. The additional stream 103 is added to the feed stream 102, or introduced into the reaction zone 101 with the feed stream 102, so that the combined stream-comprising the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103—comprises from 3.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, such as from 3.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 4.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 4.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 5.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 5.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 6.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 6.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 7.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 7.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 8.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 8.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 9.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 9.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 10.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 10.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 11.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 11.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 12.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 12.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 13.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 13.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 14.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 14.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 15.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 15.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 16.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 16.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 17.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 17.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 18.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 18.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 19.0 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2, or from 19.5 vol% to 20.0 vol% CO.sub.2. In some embodiments, the combined stream comprises from 3.0 vol% to 19.5 vol% CO.sub.2, such as from 3.0 vol% to 19.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 18.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 18.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 17.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 17.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 16.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 16.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 15.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 15.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 14.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 14.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 13.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 13.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 12.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 12.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 11.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 11.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 10.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 10.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 9.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 9.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 8.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 8.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 7.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 7.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 6.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 6.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 5.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 5.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 4.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 3.0 vol% to 4.0 vol% CO.sub.2, or from 3.0 vol% to 3.5 vol% CO.sub.2. In still other embodiments, the combined stream comprises from 3.5 vol% to 19.5 vol% CO.sub.2, such as from 4.0 vol% to 19.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 4.5 vol% to 18.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 5.0 vol% to 18.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 5.5 vol% to 17.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 6.0 vol% to 17.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 6.5 vol% to 16.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 7.0 vol% to 16.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 7.5 vol% to 15.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 8.0 vol% to 15.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 8.5 vol% to 14.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 9.0 vol% to 14.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 9.5 vol% to 13.5 vol% CO.sub.2, from 10.0 vol% to 13.0 vol% CO.sub.2, from 10.5 vol% to 12.5 vol% CO.sub.2, or from 11.0 vol% to 12.0 vol% CO.sub.2. By providing a feed stream and an additional stream 103 comprising CO.sub.2 to yield a combined feed stream having the above CO.sub.2 content, the net CO.sub.2 selectivity of the process can be controlled.

[0021] In embodiments where the additional stream 103 comprises CO.sub.2, it should be understood that the CO.sub.2 introduced in the additional stream 103 is in addition to any CO.sub.2 present in the feed stream 102. The additional stream 103 may comprise any amount CO.sub.2 such that the combined stream-comprising the feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103—has the concentrations of CO.sub.2 as disclosed hereinabove.

[0022] Introducing an additional stream 103 comprising CO.sub.2 with the feed stream 102, such as, for example, syngas (H.sub.2+CO), reduces the net CO.sub.2 selectivity. Although only co-feeding CO.sub.2 reduces the net CO.sub.2 selectivity, only introducing CO.sub.2 in the additional stream 103 also decreases the level of conversion of carbon to desired products (such as the conversion of feed carbon to any carbon-containing product that is not CO or CO.sub.2, also referred to herein as CO.sub.x conversion). However, it was found that introducing an additional stream 103 comprising CO.sub.2 together with the feed stream 102, such as, syngas and operating at a high gas hourly space velocity effectively reduces the net CO.sub.2 selectivity, and significantly lowers the impact on hydrocarbon productivity, compared to the cases operated at a lower space velocity.

[0023] In embodiments, the combined stream comprising the additional stream 103 and the feed stream 102 may have an CO.sub.2/CO volume ratio from 0.05 to 1.50, such as from 0.05 to 1.50, from 0.15 to 1.50, from 0.25 to 1.50, from 0.35 to 1.50, from 0.45 to 1.50, from 0.65 to 1.50, from 0.75 to 1.50, from 0.85 to 1.50, from 0.95 to 1.50, from 1.05 to 1.50, from 1.15 to 1.50, from 1.25 to 1.50, from 1.35 to 1.50, or from 1.45 to 1.50. In other embodiments, the combined stream comprising the additional stream 103 and the feed stream 102 may have a CO.sub.2/CO volume ratio from 0.05 to 1.40, such as from 0.05 to 1.30, from 0.05 to 1.20, from 0.05 to 1.10, from 0.05 to 1.00, from 0.05 to 0.90, from 0.05 to 0.80, from 0.05 to 0.70, from 0.05 to 0.60, from 0.05 to 0.50, from 0.05 to 0.40, from 0.05 to 0.30, from 0.05 to 0.20, or from 0.05 to 0.10. In yet other embodiments, the combined stream comprising the additional stream 103 and the feed stream 102 may have a CO.sub.2/CO volume ratio from 0.10 to 1.40, such as from 0.20 to 1.30, from 0.30 to 1.20, from 0.40 to 1.10, from 0.50 to 1.00, from 0.60 to 0.90, or from 0.70 to 0.80. In still other embodiments, the combined stream comprising the additional stream 103 and the feed stream 102 may have a CO.sub.2/CO from 0.20 to 1.35, such as from 0.35 to 1.20, from 0.50 to 1.05, from 0.65 to 0.90, or from 0.70 to 0.80. The ratio of CO.sub.2/CO must be high enough that there is sufficient CO.sub.2 to convert carbon to C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons and significantly decrease the net CO.sub.2 selectivity.

[0024] The reaction conditions within the reaction zone 101 will now be described. The feed stream 102 and the additional stream 103 are contacted with the hybrid catalyst in the reaction zone 101 under reaction conditions sufficient to form a product stream 104 comprising C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons consist essentially of C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 olefins. The reaction conditions comprise a temperature within reaction zone 101 ranging, according to one or more embodiments, from 300° C. to 500° C., such as from 380° C. to 450° C., from 380° C. to 440° C., from 380° C. to 430° C., from 380° C. to 420° C., from 380° C. to 410° C., from 380° C. to 400° C., or from 380° C. to 390° C. In other embodiments, the temperature within the reaction zone 101 is from 390° C. to 450° C., from 400° C. to 450° C., from 410° C. to 450° C., from 420° C. to 450° C., from 430° C. to 450° C., or from 440° C. to 450° C. In yet other embodiments, the temperature within the reaction zone 101 is from 380° C. to 450° C., such as from 390° C. to 440° C., from 400° C. to 430° C., or from 410° C. to 420° C.

[0025] The reaction conditions also, in embodiments, include a pressure inside the reaction zone 101 of at least 20 bar (20,000 kilopascals (kPa)), such as at least 25 bar (25,000 kPa), at least 30 bar (30,000 kPa), at least 35 bar (35,00 kPa), at least 40 bar (40,000 kPa), at least 45 bar (45,000 kPa), at least 50 bar (50,000 kPa), at least 55 bar (55,000 kPa), at least 60 bar (60,000 kPa), at least 65 bar (65,000 kPa), or at least 70 bar (70,000 kPa). In other embodiments, the reaction conditions include a pressure inside the reaction zone 101 from 20 bar (20,000 kPa) to 70 bar (70,000 kPa), such as from 25 bar (25,000 kPa) to 65 bar (65,000 kPa), or from 30 bar (30,000 kPa) to 60 bar (60,000 kPa), from 35 bar (35,000 kPa) to 55 bar (55,000 kPa), from 40 bar (40,000 kPa) to 50 bar (50,000 kPa).

[0026] The reaction conditions also, in embodiments, include a gas hourly space velocity inside the reaction zone 101 of at least 2500 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 3000 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 3600 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 4200 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 4800 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 5400 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 6000 hr.sup.-1, such as at least 6600 hr.sup.-1, or such as at least 7200 hr.sup.-1.

[0027] In embodiments, the reaction may have a net CO.sub.2 selectivity of less than 5.0%, less than 4.0%, less than 3.0%, less than 2.0%, or less than 1.0%, or even a negative net CO.sub.2 selectivity, such as less than 0.0%.

[0028] The hybrid catalyst used in the above-disclosed processes will now be described. Referring to FIG. 1, hybrid catalyst systems comprise a mixed metal oxide catalyst component, which converts the feed stream 102 and additional stream 103 to oxygenated hydrocarbons, and a microporous catalyst component (such as, for example, a zeolite component), which converts the oxygenates to hydrocarbons. The hybrid catalyst, according to embodiments, comprises a mixed metal oxide catalyst component in admixture with a microporous catalyst component that may be selected from molecular sieves having 8-MR pore access and having a framework type selected from the group consisting of the following framework types CHA, AEI, AFX, ERI, LTA, UFI, RTH, RHO, LEV, and combinations thereof, the framework types corresponding to the naming convention of the International Zeolite Association. It should be understood that in embodiments, both aluminosilicate and silicoaluminophosphate frameworks may be used. In certain embodiments, the molecular sieve may be SAPO-34 silicoaluminophosphate having a Chabazite (CHA) framework type.

[0029] Examples of these may include, but are not necessarily limited to: CHA embodiments selected from SAPO-34 and SSZ-13; and AEI embodiments such as SAPO-18. Combinations of microporous catalyst components having any of the above framework types may also be employed. It should be understood that the microporous catalyst component may have a different membered ring pore opening depending on the desired product. For instance, microporous catalyst component having 8-MR to 12-MR pore openings could be used depending on the desired product. However, to produce C.sub.2 to C.sub.4 hydrocarbons, a microporous catalyst component having 8-MR pore openings is used in embodiments.

[0030] In one or more embodiments, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component may be a bulk catalyst or a supported catalyst and may be made by any suitable method, such as co-precipitation, impregnation, or the like. In embodiments, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component comprises gallium (Ga). In embodiments, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component comprises zirconium (Zr). It should be understood that any metal in the mixed metal oxide component mixture can be present in a variety of oxidation states. It should also be understood that the designation of a specific oxide (e.g. Ga.sub.2O.sub.3), does not necessarily preclude the presence of an additional or different oxide of the given metal(s).

[0031] The mixed metal oxide catalyst component and the microporous catalyst component of the hybrid catalyst may be mixed together by any suitable means, such as, for example, by physical mixing-such as shaking, stirring, or other agitation. In other embodiments, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component and the microporous catalyst component may be present as a single formulated catalyst. The mixed metal oxide catalyst component and the microporous catalyst component may be present in the reaction zone 101, typically as a hybrid catalyst in a catalyst bed, in a weight/weight (wt/wt) ratio (mixed metal oxide catalyst component : microporous catalyst component) ranging from 0.1:1 to 10:1, such as from 0.5:1 to 9:1.

[0032] In embodiments, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component may be reduced within the reactor prior to exposure to the feed stream 102 by exposing the mixed metal oxide catalyst component to conventional reducing gases. In other embodiments, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component may be reduced within the reactor upon exposure to reducing gases in the feed stream 102 such as H.sub.2 and CO.

EXAMPLES

[0033] Embodiments will be further clarified by the following examples.

Example 1 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3

[0034] Various performance tests were carried out at 30 bar (3.0 MPa), at a temperature of 420° C., and at a gas hourly space velocities of at least 2500 hr.sup.-1. These performance tests were completed by flowing a stream comprising syngas and a stream comprising CO.sub.2 to yield a combined stream with the desired CO.sub.2:CO ratio as shown in Table 1 over a catalyst comprising a mixed metal oxide catalyst component and a microporous catalyst component. In these performance tests, the mixed metal oxide catalyst component comprised gallium and the microporous catalyst component comprised SAPO-34. The results are shown in Table 1 below. The reactor effluent composition was obtained by gas chromatography and the CO.sub.x conversion was calculated using the following equation:

[0034] [00001]$\begin{array}{l}{\text{CO}}_{\text{x}}\text{Conversion}={\text{X}}_{{\text{CO}}_{\text{X}}}\left(\text{\%}\right)=\left[\left({\text{n}}_{\text{CO, in}}+{\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, in}}-{\text{n}}_{\text{CO, out}}-\right.\right.\\ \left.\left.{\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, out}}\right)\text{/}\left({\text{n}}_{\text{CO, in}}+{\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, in}}\right)\right]\cdot 100.\end{array}$

In equation (1), n.sub.CO and n.sub.CO2 are the molar flows of CO and CO.sub.2 respectively.

[0035] For net CO.sub.2 consumption (CO.sub.2 selectivity < 0), the net selectivity of product j where e.g.

[00002]$\begin{array}{l}\left.\text{j}=\text{hydrocarbons and oxygenates}\right){\text{: S}}_{\text{j}}\left(\text{\%}\right)=\left[\left[\left({\text{aj * n}}_{\text{j, out}}\right)\text{/}\right.\right.\\ \left.\left({\text{n}}_{\text{CO, in}}-{\text{n}}_{\text{CO, out}}+{\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, in}}-{\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, out}}\right)\right]\cdot 100.\end{array}$

[00003]$\begin{array}{l}{\text{For net CO}}_{\text{2}}\text{Production}\left({\text{CO}}_{\text{2}}\text{selectivity > 0}\right)\text{, the net selectivity}\\ {\text{of CO}}_{\text{2}}{\text{: S}}_{\text{CO2}}\left(\text{\%}\right)=\left[\left[\left({\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, out}}-{\text{n}}_{\text{CO2, in}}\right)\text{/}\left({\text{n}}_{\text{CO, in}}-\right.\right.\right.\\ \left.\left.{\text{n}}_{\text{CO, out}}\right)\right]\cdot 100.\end{array}$

[00004]$\begin{array}{l}{\text{For net CO}}_{\text{2}}\text{production}\left({\text{CO}}_{\text{2}}\text{selectivity > 0}\right)\text{, the net selectivity}\\ \left.\text{of product j where, e}\text{.g}\text{. j}=\text{hydrocarbons and oxygenates}\right)\text{:}\\ {\text{S}}_{\text{j}}\left(\text{\%}\right)=\left[\left[\left({\text{a}}_{\text{j}}{\text{* n}}_{\text{j, out}}\right)\text{/}\left({\text{n}}_{\text{CO, in}}-{\text{n}}_{\text{CO, out}}\right)\right]\right.\cdot 100.\end{array}$

[0036] For net CO.sub.2-neutral operation, both equations are equal with S.sub.CO2 (%) = 0.

[0037] In equations (2)and (4), a is the number of carbon atoms for product j and n.sub.j,.sub.out is the molar outlet of product j.

TABLE-US-00001 Example Combined Stream Composition (% H.sub.2/% CO.sub.2/% CO) Mixed Metal Oxide Catalyst Component (mg) Microporous Catalyst Component (mg) GHSV (hr.sup.-1) CO.sub.x Conversion (%) Net CO.sub.2 Selectivity (%) C.sub.2-C.sub.4 Olefin Productivity (g/kg cat/hr) Ex. 1 69.9/8.6/21.5 120.1 39.9 5000 19.6 3.5 121.0 Comp Ex. 1 69.9/8.6/21.5 200.1 100.1 3200 24.8 14 102.3 Comp. Ex. 2 81.25/0/18.7 5 133.4 133.3 3300 42 27.3 83.2 Comp. Ex. 3 69.9/8.6/21.5 240.1 80.1 2500 25.1 16.8 79.6

[0038] As can be seen in Table 1, Comparative Examples 1-3 do not yield a net CO.sub.2 selectivity less than 5.0%. However, Example 1 demonstrates a net CO.sub.2 selectivity of less than 5.0 % when operating in the presence of less catalyst, which leads to a higher gas hourly space velocity than Comparative Example 1. Although the absolute numbers for the net CO.sub.2 selectivity will differ with process conditions, the examples show a general trend that the net CO.sub.2 selectivity decreases as the CO.sub.2 co-fed to the reactor is increased and the process is operated at a high gas hourly space velocity. As can be seen from Comparative Examples 1 and 2, with a decrease in the amount of CO.sub.2 fed to the reactor, even operating at a higher space velocity does not result in a net CO.sub.2 selectivity less than 5.0%.

[0039] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Thus, it is intended that the specification cover the modifications and variations of the various embodiments described herein provided such modification and variations come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.