Herbicidal compositions comprising isoxazolo[5,4-b]pyridines

Abstract

The present invention relates to herbicidal compositions comprising an isoxazolo[5,4-b]pyridine and at least one further compound selected from herbicidally active compounds and, if desired, safeners. The present invention also relates to the use of such a composition for controlling unwanted vegetation and to a method for controlling unwanted vegetation, which comprises allowing a composition to act on plants, their seeds and/or their habitat.

Claims

1. A herbicidal composition comprising: as component A) an isoxazolo[5,4-b]pyridine compound of formula I ##STR00007## wherein the variables are as defined below: R.sup.1 is hydrogen; R.sup.2 is cyclopropyl; and R.sup.3 is cyclopropyl or an agriculturally useful salt thereof; and as component B) at least one further herbicide selected from b3) photosynthesis inhibitors selected from the group consisting of paraquat, pentanochlor, propanil, bentazone, bromoxynil, phenmedipham, pyridate, atrazine, terbuthylazin, ametryne, metribuzin, hexazinone, amicarbazone, bromacil, chlorotoluron, diuron, and isoproturon; wherein component A and component B are present in synergistically effective amounts and in a weight ratio of A:B from 75:1 to 1:75.

2. An agrochemical composition comprising the herbicidal composition of claim 1, at least one inert liquid and/or solid carrier and, if desired, at least one further additive.

3. A method for controlling unwanted vegetation, comprising allowing the composition of claim 1 to act on plants, their seeds and/or their habitat.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the unwanted vegetation is controlled in a crop field where crop plants are cultivated.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the crop plants are selected from cereals, corn, soybean, rice, millet, oilseed rape, cotton, sugarcane, potatoes, legumes, turf and permanent crops.

6. The herbicidal composition of claim 1, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitors are selected from the group consisting of paraquat, bentazone, bromoxynil, atrazine, terbuthylazin, metribuzin, amicarbazone, and chlorotoluron.

7. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is paraquat.

8. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is bentazone.

9. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is bromoxynil.

10. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is atrazine.

11. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is terbuthylazin.

12. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is metribuzin.

13. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is amicarbazone.

14. The herbicidal composition of claim 6, wherein the b3) photosynthesis inhibitor is chlorotoluron.

Description

USE EXAMPLES

(1) The following examples serve to illustrate the invention.

(2) The herbicidal action of the compositions according to the invention was demonstrated by the following greenhouse experiments:

(3) The culture containers used were plastic pots containing medium loamy sand with approximately 4.6% of humus and 69.9% sand as substrate. The seeds of the test plants were sown separately for each species.

(4) For the pre-emergence treatment, the active compounds, suspended or emulsified in water, were applied directly after sowing by means of finely distributing nozzles. The containers were irrigated gently to promote germination and growth and subsequently covered with transparent plastic hoods until the plants had rooted. This cover caused uniform germination of the test plants unless this was adversely affected by the active compounds.

(5) For the post-emergence treatment, the test plants were grown to a plant height of from 1 to 15 cm, depending on the plant habit, and only then treated with the active compounds which had been suspended or emulsified in water. To this end, the test plants were either sown directly, and grown in the same containers, or they were first grown separately as seedlings and transplanted into the test containers a few days prior to treatment.

(6) Depending on the species, the plants were kept at 10-25 C. and 20-35 C., respectively.

(7) The test period extended over 1 to 3 weeks. During this time, the plants were tended and their response to the individual treatments was evaluated 20 days after treatment except mentioned otherwise.

(8) Evaluation was carried out using a scale from 0 to 100. 100 means no emergence of the plants, or complete destruction of at least the above-ground parts, and 0 means no damage or normal course of growth.

(9) The respective stated components A and B, and, if appropriate, C, were formulated as a 10% by weight strength emulsion concentrate and, with addition of the amount of solvent system, introduced into the spray liquor used for applying the active compound. In the examples, the solvent used was water.

(10) In the examples below, using the method of S. R. Colby (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations, Weeds 15, p. 22 ff., the value E, which is expected if the activity of the individual active compounds is only additive, was calculated.
E=X+Y(X.Math.Y/100)

(11) where

(12) X=percent activity using active compound A at an application rate a;

(13) Y=percent activity using active compound B at an application rate b;

(14) E=expected activity (in %) by A+B at application rates a+b.

(15) If the value found experimentally is higher than the value E calculated according to Colby, a synergistic effect is present.

(16) The plants used in the greenhouse experiments were of the following species:

(17) TABLE-US-00004 Bayer code Scientific name ABUTH Abutilon theophrast ALOMY Alopecurus myosuroides AMARE Amaranthus retroflexus AMBEL Ambrosia artemisiifolia APESV Apera spica-venti CHEAL Chenopodium album CONAR Convolvulus arvensis DIGSA Digitaria sanguinalis ECHCG Echinochloa crus-galli ERICA Conyza canadensis GALAP Galium aparine GERDI Geranium dissectum GERPU Geranium pusillum IPOHE Ipomoea hederacea KCHSC Kochia scoparia LAMAM Lamium amplexicaule LOLMU Lolium multiflorum MATCH Matricaria recutita PANMI Panicum miliaceum PAPRH Papaver rhoeas POLAV Polygonum aviculare POLCO Polygonum convolvulus POLPE Persicaria maculosa SASKR Salsola kali SEBEX Sesbania exaltata SETVI Setaria viridis STEME Stellaria media VIOAR Viola arvensis note: 100-90%: very good 90-80%: good

(18) The results of these tests are given below in the use examples and demonstrate the synergistic effect of the mixtures comprising at least one compound of the formula (I) and at least one herbicide B. In this context, a.i. means active ingredient, based on 100% active ingredient.

Use Example 1

(19) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.190 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+chlorotoluron (B.190)

(20) TABLE-US-00005 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO AMARE STEME GERDI IPOHE I.1 B.190 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 50 35 70 30 65 62.5 50 40 70 60 60 31.25 62.5 100 75 98 61 100 91 100 72 100 86 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO IPOHE POLAV AMARE CHEAL I.1 B.190 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.6 30 50 45 30 70 62.5 50 60 50 40 95 15.6 62.5 100 65 100 80 100 73 98 58 100 99

Use Example 2

(21) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+bentazon in form of sodium-salt (bentazon Na)

(22) TABLE-US-00006 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO AMARE POLAV I.1 bentazon Na found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 50 35 80 125 40 75 40 31.25 125 90 70 98 84 90 88

Use Example 3

(23) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.67 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+atrazine (B.67)

(24) TABLE-US-00007 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha LOLMU PHACA GERDI MATCH CONAR I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 20 35 40 0 0 125 35 30 70 50 65 62.5 125 80 48 70 55 100 82 100 50 98 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 90 125 60 62.5 125 100 96 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ABUTH STEME MATCH GERDI I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 60 70 30 30 125 60 75 70 85 31.25 125 95 84 100 93 100 79 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha LOLMU PHACA POLCO CHEAL GALAP I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 0 0 65 75 125 35 30 60 80 70 31.25 125 80 35 70 0 100 60 98 93 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH MATCH CONAR STEME GERDI I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 60 30 0 70 30 125 60 70 65 75 85 31.25 125 95 84 100 79 95 65 100 93 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha CHEAL GERDI POLCO GALAP I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.6 0 0 0 20 125 80 70 60 70 15.6 125 98 80 100 70 70 60 85 76 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha LOLMU ABUTH STEME CONAR I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.6 0 30 0 0 125 35 60 75 65 15.6 125 70 35 85 72 100 75 98 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI LOLMU ABUTH CONAR I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 7.8 0 0 0 0 125 70 35 60 65 7.8 125 100 70 60 35 80 60 98 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY LOLMU ECHCG GALAP CONAR I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 40 65 10 25 62.5 35 20 35 65 60 62.5 62.5 65 35 65 52 85 77 90 69 85 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 65 62.5 80 62.5 62.5 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY POLCO CHEAL GALAP STEME I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 20.8 0 30 85 0 50 62.5 35 80 75 65 80 20.8 62.5 50 35 100 86 100 96 70 65 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha CONAR ECHCG I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 20.8 0 30 62.5 60 35 20.8 62.5 65 60 60 55 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY STEME APESV CHEAL I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 6.9 0 0 0 0 62.5 35 80 60 75 6.9 62.5 40 35 100 80 65 60 85 75 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha STEME APESV I.1 B.67 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 2.3 0 0 62.5 80 60 2.3 62.5 100 80 65 60

Use Example 4

(25) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.69 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+bromoxynil (B.69)

(26) TABLE-US-00008 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH CHEAL GALAP ERICA CONAR I.1 B.69 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 60 65 90 65 25 35 60 50 30 50 62.5 25 85 68 100 84 100 83 100 93 100 83 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha CHEAL CONAR MATCH I.1 B.69 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 70 30 25 60 50 0 31.25 25 85 72 100 85 100 30

Use Example 5

(27) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.191 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+pyridate (B.191)

(28) TABLE-US-00009 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GALAP STEME MATCH ERICA I.1 B.191 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 65 85 30 90 225 90 0 20 70 62.5 225 100 97 100 85 95 44 100 97

Use Example 6

(29) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.76 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+isoproturon (B.76)

(30) TABLE-US-00010 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha CHEAL CONAR DIGSA I.1 B.76 found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 60 65 40 225 65 65 30 62.5 225 100 86 100 88 65 58 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMARE CHEAL DIGSA I.1 B.76 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 90 30 35 225 50 65 30 31.25 225 98 95 100 76 60 55

Use Example 7

(31) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.82 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+terbuthylazine (B.82)

(32) TABLE-US-00011 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha CHEAL GALAP I.1 B.82 found calculated found calculated 62.5 60 65 31.25 65 55 62.5 31.25 100 86 85 84

Use Example 8

(33) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.77 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+linuron (B.77)

(34) TABLE-US-00012 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha LOLMU GALAP CONAR I.1 B.77 found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 20 10 25 75 35 40 50 62.5 75 60 48 65 46 85 63

Use Example 9

(35) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.79 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+metribuzin (B.79)

(36) TABLE-US-00013 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG POLCO I.1 B.79 found calculated found calculated 62.5 65 75 25 20 20 62.5 25 75 72 100 80 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO MATCH I.1 B.79 found calculated found calculated 20.8 50 60 25 20 65 20.8 25 90 60 98 86

Use Example 10

(37) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.192 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+phenmedipham (B.192)

(38) TABLE-US-00014 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha SETVI AMARE CHEAL MATCH AMBEL I.1 B.192 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 20.8 25 70 85 60 30 62.5 65 35 50 50 90 20.8 62.5 75 74 95 81 95 93 100 80 98 93

Use Example 11

(39) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.80 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+propanil (B.80)

(40) TABLE-US-00015 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha DIGSA CONAR ERICA I.1 B.80 found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 40 25 65 250 40 20 65 62.5 250 65 64 70 40 98 88

Use Example 12

(41) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.107 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+topramezone (B.107)

(42) TABLE-US-00016 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ABUTH GALAP ERICA I.1 B.107 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 65 10 65 6 35 85 70 65 62.5 6 100 54 95 95 80 73 98 88 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH ERICA ABUTH I.1 B.107 found calculated found calculated found calculated 20.8 60 65 0 6 70 65 85 20.8 6 95 88 100 88 90 85

Use Example 13

(43) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.113 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+glyphosate (B.113)

(44) TABLE-US-00017 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PANMI GALAP GERDI I.1 B.113 found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 80 80 135 90 80 80 125 135 98 96 98 96 98 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PANMI GALAP CONAR I.1 B.113 found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 80 80 33.75 80 50 45 125 33.75 95 92 98 90 100 89

Use Example 14

(45) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.193 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+(1RS,2SR,4SR)-1,4-epoxy-p-menth-2-yl2-methylbenzyl ether (B.193)

(46) TABLE-US-00018 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG DIGSA GERDI ALOMY I.1 B.193 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 250 95 35 95 45 15 40 20 40 0 250 15 98 97 80 48 98 97 60 45

Use Example 15

(47) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.030 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+imazamox (B.30)

(48) TABLE-US-00019 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR CONAR GERDI I.1 B.30 found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 25 85 3.75 45 85 90 62.5 3.75 65 45 90 89 100 99

Use Example 16

(49) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.84 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+paraquat-dichloride (B.84)

(50) TABLE-US-00020 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL VIOAR SASKR ERICA GALAP I.1 B.84 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 40 10 55 65 17.5 90 55 70 35 55 31.25 17.5 100 97 75 73 98 73 75 71 85 84 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH VIOAR POLCO CONAR I.1 B.84 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 80 40 90 45 17.5 80 55 30 10 62.5 17.5 98 96 75 73 95 93 60 51

Use Example 17

(51) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.87 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+carfentrazone-ethyl (B.87)

(52) TABLE-US-00021 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha LAMAM PAPRH MATCH GERDI I.1 B.87 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 85 85 80 85 1.75 80 30 75 70 62.5 1.75 100 97 100 90 98 95 98 96 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha LALAM SEBEX MATCH GERPU I.1 B.87 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 75 35 80 1.75 80 75 75 75 31.25 1.75 98 94 100 94 95 84 98 95

Use Example 18

(53) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.139 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+pyroxasulfone (B.139)

(54) TABLE-US-00022 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha GERPU LAMAM SEBEX CONAR ABUTH I.1 B.139 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 80 80 80 30 10 25 25 45 35 60 60 31.25 25 98 85 90 89 95 87 75 72 75 64 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha GERPU AMBEL CONAR POLCO POLPE I.1 B.139 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 80 65 30 65 30 12.5 0 10 60 15 55 31.25 12.5 95 80 75 69 80 72 80 70 80 69

Use Example 19

(55) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.92 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+saflufenacil (B.92)

(56) TABLE-US-00023 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA GALAP I.1 B.92 found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 65 0.5 80 80 31.25 0.5 100 85 98 93

Use Example 20

(57) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.100 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+isoxaflutole (B.100)

(58) TABLE-US-00024 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha VIOAR AMBEL ERICA GERDI I.1 B.100 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 30 90 75 65 12.5 70 45 80 0 62.5 12.5 85 79 98 95 100 95 100 65 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha POLCO AMBEL ERICA GERDI I.1 B.100 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 90 25 60 12.5 60 45 80 0 31.25 12.5 95 88 98 95 98 85 90 60

Use Example 21

(59) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.40 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+imazethapyr (B.40)

(60) TABLE-US-00025 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha PAPRH IPOHE GERDI I.1 B.40 found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 65 95 70 7.5 45 80 90 62.5 7.5 100 81 100 99 98 97 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ECHCG POLCO GERDI I.1 B.40 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 20 30 7.5 85 80 95 31.25 7.5 90 85 90 84 98 97

Use Example 22

(61) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.104 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+sulcotrione (B.104)

(62) TABLE-US-00026 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ECHCG VIOAR MATCH I.1 B.104 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 0 10 15 80 85 10 31.25 15 98 80 100 85 100 19 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ERICA POLCO GERDI KCHSC I.1 B.104 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 70 30 75 15 75 90 45 90 31.25 15 95 81 98 97 75 62 100 98

Use Example 23

(63) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.2605 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+fenoxaprop-ethyl (B.5)+mefenpyr-diethyl (C.13)

(64) TABLE-US-00027 herbicidal activity against application rate APESV GALAP a.i. in g/ha cal- POLCO cal- I.1 B.5 C.13 found culated found calculated found culated 31.25 0 45 50 7.5 8.15 65 0 0 31.25 7.5 8.15 75 65 60 45 60 50

Use Example 24

(65) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.59 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+rimsulfuron (B.59)

(66) TABLE-US-00028 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha PAPRH ERICA IPOHE I.1 B.59 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 50 25 75 0.5 65 65 90 31.25 0.5 85 83 75 74 98 98 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH GERDI I.1 B.59 found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 90 0.5 75 75 62.5 0.5 100 88 100 98

Use Example 25

(67) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.120 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+glufosinate ammonium (B.120)

(68) TABLE-US-00029 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha VIOAR POLCO ABUTH GERDI GALAP I.1 B.120 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 25 25 40 50 125 15 65 70 90 80 31.25 125 80 15 95 74 90 78 98 94 98 90 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha PAPRH MATCH IPOHE GERDI KCHSC I.1 B.120 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 50 0 75 35 90 62.5 30 55 80 40 45 31.25 62.5 85 65 95 55 98 95 95 61 100 95

Use Example 26

(69) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.02 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+clodinafop-propargyl (B.2)

(70) TABLE-US-00030 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ALOMY MATCH IPOHE ABUTH I.1 B.2 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 20 70 90 25 15 85 0 40 15 62.5 15 90 88 80 70 98 94 75 36 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha GERDI STEME POHE GALAP I.1 B.2 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 90 65 90 50 7.5 0 0 10 0 62.5 7.5 98 90 80 65 98 91 65 50

Use Example 27

(71) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.44 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+iodosulfuron methyl sodium (B.44)

(72) TABLE-US-00031 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ALOMY POLCO I.1 B.44 found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 40 1 20 90 62.5 1 55 20 98 94

Use Example 28

(73) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.60 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+sulfosulfuron (B.60)

(74) TABLE-US-00032 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ALOMY APESV POLCO PAPRH I.1 B.60 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 0 40 50 3 60 60 90 90 62.5 3 85 60 85 60 98 94 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR ERICA POLCO I.1 B.60 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 0 30 3 65 75 90 31.25 3 85 72 80 75 95 93

Use Example 29

(75) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.26 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+florasulam (B.26)

(76) TABLE-US-00033 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha POLCO PAPRH I.1 B.26 found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 50 2 85 98 31.25 2 98 96 100 99

Use Example 30

(77) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.35 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+imazapyr (B.35)

(78) TABLE-US-00034 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha ABUTH GERDI MATCH I.1 B.35 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 30 40 10 90 95 55 31.25 10 95 91 98 97 98 73 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha POLCO VIOAR ERICA I.1 B.35 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 25 0 5 95 55 75 31.25 5 98 97 70 66 80 75

Use Example 31

(79) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.101 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+mesotrione (B.101)

(80) TABLE-US-00035 application herbicidal activity against rate a.i. in PAPRH g/ha cal- AMBEL SASKR I.1 B.101 found culated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 85 20 9.375 35 80 75 31.25 9375 75 35 100 97 100 80 application herbicidal activity against rate a.i. in MATCH g/ha cal- ERICA GERDI I.1 B.101 found culated found calculated found calculated 31.25 35 35 55 9.375 75 80 0 31.25 9375 100 84 95 87 80 55

Use Example 32

(81) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.106 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+tembotrione (B.106)

(82) TABLE-US-00036 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha SASKR MATCH ERICA IPOHE I.1 B.106 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 35 35 70 9.375 65 65 90 70 31.25 9375 80 72 100 77 95 94 95 91

Use Example 33

(83) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.51 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+nicosulfuron (B.51)

(84) TABLE-US-00037 application rate a.i. in herbicidal activity against g/ha AMBEL MATCH POLPE I.1 B.51 found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 85 35 45 20 80 90 95 31.25 20 100 97 95 94 98 97

Use Example 34

(85) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.164 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+MCPA (B.164)

(86) TABLE-US-00038 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GALAP POLAV CONAR I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 80 65 70 400 30 85 90 125 400 95 86 98 95 100 97 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLAV CONAR I.1 B. 164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 70 200 85 90 125 200 100 95 100 97 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR POLAV CONAR POLCO I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 65 60 85 400 70 85 90 50 62.25 400 100 70 100 95 100 96 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR POLAV CONAR POLCO I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 65 60 85 200 65 85 90 50 62.5 200 70 65 100 95 100 96 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR POLAV I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 65 100 60 70 62.5 100 75 60 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLPE LAMAM MATCH CONAR STEME I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 70 0 40 70 400 80 70 50 90 80 31.25 400 100 94 95 91 55 50 98 94 100 94 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLPE PAPRH ABUTH STEME LAMAM I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 65 40 70 70 200 65 65 80 60 65 31.25 200 100 90 95 88 98 88 95 88 95 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH GERDI STEME I.1 B.164 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 70 70 100 60 65 50 31.25 100 100 86 98 90 100 85

Use Example 35

(87) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+pyrasulfatole

(88) TABLE-US-00039 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR CONAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 90 70 40 60 85 125 40 100 96 98 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha CONAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 70 20 65 125 20 98 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR CONAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 90 70 10 0 60 125 10 100 90 98 88 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 40 60 62.5 40 80 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR POLAV CONAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 65 60 20 40 70 65 62.5 20 70 40 100 90 90 86 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 10 0 62.5 10 60 0 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH MATCH CONAR GERDI VIOAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 0 40 70 0 40 65 50 85 50 60 31.25 40 100 88 100 50 100 91 100 85 65 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH VIOAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 0 20 65 40 31.25 20 100 88 50 40 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH VIOAR MATCH CONAR SASKAR I.1 pyrasulfatole found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 0 0 40 60 10 50 0 50 60 90 31.25 10 100 83 60 0 100 50 98 76 100 96

Use Example 36

(89) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+naptalam

(90) TABLE-US-00040 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha SORVU VIOAR POLAV SASKR I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 20 0 70 65 200 50 70 75 80 62.5 200 65 60 80 70 98 93 98 93 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha CONAR VIOAR POLAV SASKR KCHAS I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 5 0 70 65 10 200 80 70 75 80 85 31.25 200 95 81 75 70 98 93 98 93 95 87 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha CONAR I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 70 100 80 125 100 98 94 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR POLAV I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 70 100 65 75 62.5 100 70 65 98 93 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha CONAR MATCH ABUTH KCHSC I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 5 0 35 10 100 80 65 85 85 31.25 100 95 81 70 65 95 90 95 87 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 70 50 80 125 50 98 94 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha MATCH POLAV SASKR POLCO I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 10 70 65 70 50 30 70 70 75 62.5 50 70 37 95 91 95 90 98 93 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha POLAV MATCH CONAR POLCO I.1 naptalam found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 0 5 35 50 70 30 80 75 31.25 50 98 91 70 30 95 81 90 84

Use Example 37

(91) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.96 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+benzobicyclon (B.96)

(92) TABLE-US-00041 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR SASKR CONAR I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 65 65 140 65 65 75 62.5 140 80 65 95 88 98 91 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha POLAV IPOHE POLCO GALAP I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 70 80 70 65 140 70 70 80 80 62.5 140 95 91 98 94 98 94 98 93 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha POLCO KCHSC VIOAR IPOHE SORVU I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 35 10 0 70 0 140 80 55 65 70 60 31.25 140 95 87 70 60 70 65 95 91 65 60 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR POLAV POLCO GALAP KCHSC I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 70 70 65 90 70 65 70 70 75 40 62.5 70 80 65 95 91 95 91 95 91 98 94 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha POLCO KCHSC VIOAR IPOHE ABUTH I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 35 10 0 70 35 70 70 40 65 70 85 31.25 70 90 81 85 46 70 65 95 91 95 90 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR KCHSC I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 90 35 65 35 62.5 35 80 65 98 94 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha POLPE KCHSC ABUTH I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 10 35 35 85 35 80 31.25 35 98 87 85 42 95 87 application rate herbicidal activity 6 days after treatment against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR IPOHE STEME I.1 B.96 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 70 60 35 65 70 85 31.25 35 70 65 95 91 98 94

Use Example 38

(93) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.20 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+bispyribac-sodium (B.20)

(94) TABLE-US-00042 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY I.1 B.20 Found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 30 4 55 125 4 80 69 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY APESV I.1 B.20 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 25 20 4 55 60 62.5 4 70 66 75 68 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 B.20 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 15 4 65 31.25 4 90 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY I.1 B.20 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 30 2 30 125 2 60 51 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH IPOHE I.1 B.20 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 15 25 2 35 30 31.25 2 60 45 60 48

Use Example 39

(95) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.24 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+cyclosulfamuron (B.24)

(96) TABLE-US-00043 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH ALOMY I.1 B.24 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 75 30 2 65 35 125 2 100 91 60 55 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH KCHSC ABUTH I.1 B.24 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 40 15 2 65 45 85 31.25 2 85 74 80 67 90 87 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY I.1 B.24 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 30 1 25 125 1 55 48 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha IPOHE KCHSC APESV I.1 B.24 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 40 20 1 75 45 0 31.25 1 95 81 75 67 30 20

Use Example 40

(97) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.63 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+tribenuron-methyl (B.63)

(98) TABLE-US-00044 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO VIOAR I.1 B.63 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 80 0 1 30 40 125 1 100 86 98 40 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO I.1 B.63 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 1 30 31.25 1 60 51 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO MATCH ALOMY I.1 B.63 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 80 75 30 0.5 20 30 0 125 0.5 100 84 100 83 60 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR I.1 B.63 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 0.5 65 62.5 0.5 85 65

Use Example 41

(99) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.52 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+penoxsulam (B.52)

(100) TABLE-US-00045 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR I.1 B.52 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 0 5 60 125 5 80 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.52 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 35 5 90 62.5 5 98 94 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH ERICA I.1 B.52 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 15 0 5 90 90 31.25 5 98 92 98 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY VIOAR APESV GERDI I.1 B.52 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 30 0 35 65 2.5 55 0 55 80 125 2.5 80 69 40 0 75 71 98 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY APESV VIOAR ABUTH GERDI I.1 B.52 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 25 20 0 60 65 2.5 55 55 0 85 80 62.5 2.5 80 66 90 64 40 0 98 94 98 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.52 found calculated 62.5 35 2.5 90 62.5 2.5 98 94 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY GERDI ERICA ABUTH I.1 B.52 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 50 0 15 2.5 55 80 90 85 31.25 2.5 80 66 98 90 98 90 90 87

Use Example 42

(101) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.88 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+flumioxazin (B.88)

(102) TABLE-US-00046 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH APESV GERDI ALOMY I.1 B.88 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 10 0 0 2 75 65 70 20 62.5 2 100 94 75 69 75 70 30 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH APESV I.1 B.88 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 75 0 2 75 65 31.25 2 100 94 70 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH I.1 B.88 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 70 2 75 15.62 2 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH GERDI APESV ALOMY KCHSC I.1 B.88 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 0 10 0 80 1 25 70 25 0 85 62.5 1 100 90 70 55 33 40 0 100 97 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH KCHSC APESV ABUTH I.1 B.88 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 75 55 0 60 1 25 85 25 90 31.25 1 100 85 100 93 45 25 100 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha KCHSC APESV I.1 B.88 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 45 0 1 85 25 15.62 1 100 92 60 25

Use Example 43

(103) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.95 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+trifludimoxazin (B.95)

(104) TABLE-US-00047 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG GERDI MATCH ERICA GALAP I.1 B.95 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 0 65 10 60 2 45 65 65 45 75 62.5 2 85 75 100 65 100 88 100 51 95 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH ERICA GALAP I.1 B.95 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 0 50 2 65 45 75 31.25 2 100 69 100 45 95 88 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.95 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 0 2 45 15.62 2 65 45 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY PAPRH ERICA GERDI APESV I.1 B.95 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 75 10 0 10 1 25 35 40 65 30 62.5 1 60 25 100 84 60 46 75 65 55 37 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY PAPRH MATCH ERICA GALAP I.1 B.95 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 75 10 0 50 1 25 35 30 40 75 31.25 1 55 25 100 84 100 37 55 40 90 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH ERICA ECHCG APESV I.1 B.95 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 10 0 10 0 1 30 40 25 30 15.62 1 55 37 55 40 45 33 40 30

Use Example 44

(105) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.57 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+pyroxsulam (B.57)

(106) TABLE-US-00048 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH ERICA I.1 B.57 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 10 2 0 75 62.5 2 90 75 98 78 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha IPOHE I.1 B.57 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 30 1 80 62.5 1 98 86

Use Example 45

(107) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.89 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+fomesafen (B.89)

(108) TABLE-US-00049 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI IPOHE ERICA I.1 B.89 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 30 10 25 25 85 20 62.5 25 75 25 100 90 35 28 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha STEME IPOHE ABUTH I.1 B.89 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 25 60 25 0 85 90 31.25 25 65 0 100 89 100 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha STEME IPOHE GERDI I.1 B.89 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 0 25 0 25 0 85 25 15.62 25 20 0 100 89 35 25 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY GERDI VIOAR IPOHE I.1 B.89 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 0 25 30 12.5 25 25 55 85 62.5 12.5 45 25 65 25 100 66 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha STEME I.1 B.89 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 12.5 0 31.25 12.5 20 0 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO I.1 B.89 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 0 12.5 95 15.62 12.5 100 95

Use Example 46

(109) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.167 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+quinclorac (B.167)

(110) TABLE-US-00050 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ABUTH GERDI MATCH I.1 B.167 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 40 0 60 0 125 30 70 0 30 62.5 125 100 58 80 70 100 60 50 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG I.1 B.167 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 125 20 31.25 125 50 28 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ECHCG I.1 B.167 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 10 0 125 30 20 15.62 125 50 37 40 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH MATCH POLCO KCHSC I.1 B.167 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 0 40 70 62.5 65 0 0 0 62.5 62.5 75 65 40 0 50 40 80 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha KCHSC I.1 B.167 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 62.5 0 31.25 62.5 60 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO I.1 B.167 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 10 62.5 0 15.62 62.5 50 10

Use Example 47

(111) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.103 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+picolinafen (B.103)

(112) TABLE-US-00051 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO GERDI ERICA KCHSC I.1 B.103 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 40 60 0 70 15 70 0 65 60 62.5 15 100 82 100 60 100 65 100 88 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI PAPRH ERICA IPOHE KCHSC I.1 B.103 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 30 0 70 30 15 0 70 65 60 60 31.25 15 60 60 100 79 100 65 98 88 85 72 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha STEME PAPRH I.1 B.103 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 60 30 15 65 70 15.62 15 100 86 100 79 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO GERDI ERICA KCHSC GALAP I.1 B.103 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 40 60 0 70 50 7.5 40 0 25 60 70 62.5 7.5 100 64 100 60 40 25 100 88 95 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG GERDI KCHSC I.1 B.103 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 30 30 7.5 20 0 60 31.25 7.5 40 28 100 30 85 72 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO GERDI IPOHE I.1 B.103 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.6 10 0 20 7.5 40 0 40 15.6 7.5 98 46 30 0 65 52

Use Example 48

(113) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.91 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+oxyfluorfen (B.91)

(114) TABLE-US-00052 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.91 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 200 90 62.5 200 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.91 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 200 90 31.25 200 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG ERICA ALOMY I.1 B.91 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 0 0 100 60 0 85 62.5 100 95 80 100 0 98 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG AMBEL ERICA ALMOY I.1 B.91 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 0 0 0 100 60 70 0 85 31.25 100 90 64 98 70 90 0 95 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG AMBEL ERICA ALMOY I.1 B.91 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.62 0 0 0 0 100 60 70 0 85 15.62 100 85 60 98 70 65 0 98 85

Use Example 49

(115) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.144 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+aminopyralid (B.144)

(116) TABLE-US-00053 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO I.1 B.144 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 40 8 98 62.5 8 100 99 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL KCHSC I.1 B.144 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 30 8 75 0 31.25 8 85 75 55 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL KCHSC I.1 B.144 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.625 0 0 8 75 0 15.625 8 85 75 20 0 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV POLCO ABUTH GERDI KCHSC I.1 B.144 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 40 0 60 70 4 0 98 0 30 0 62.5 4 20 0 100 99 40 0 70 60 80 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI VIOLA I.1 B.144 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 15.625 0 0 4 0 0 15.625 4 20 0 35 0

Use Example 50

(117) Synergistic herbicidal applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+DMTA

(118) TABLE-US-00054 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI IPOHE I.1 DMTA found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 70 95 350 60 25 125 350 95 88 98 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY POLCO MATCH I.1 DMTA found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 75 60 350 45 25 30 62.5 350 55 45 98 81 100 72 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY AMBEL GERDI MATCH I.1 DMTA found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 10 10 15 350 45 20 60 30 31.25 350 55 45 65 28 65 64 75 41 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY APESV GERDI VIOLA I.1 DMTA found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 25 0 70 30 175 0 95 30 0 125 175 40 25 100 95 95 79 80 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY ECHCG VIOLA MATCH ERICA I.1 DMTA found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 15 20 60 10 175 0 90 0 30 15 65.5 175 20 0 95 92 30 20 80 72 75 24 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO AMBEL GERDI MATCH ERICA I.1 DMTA found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 10 10 15 10 175 0 0 30 30 15 31.25 175 40 20 35 10 55 37 60 41 35 15

Use Example 51

(119) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.178 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+indaziflam (B.178)

(120) TABLE-US-00055 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV GALAP GERDI I.1 B.178 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 0 65 70 3 40 65 55 125 3 65 40 100 88 100 87 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA KCHSC I.1 B.178 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 10 60 3 15 15 62.5 3 35 24 85 66 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH KCHSC I.1 B.178 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 15 30 3 55 35 15 31.25 3 65 60 60 45 45 41 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GALAP MATCH ERICA I.1 B.178 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 65 60 10 6 60 60 65 60 62.5 6 90 82 90 86 100 86 100 64 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH ABUTH AMBEL GERDI I.1 B.178 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 15 0 10 10 6 35 60 70 55 31.25 6 60 45 65 60 85 73 60 60

Use Example 52

(121) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.130 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+flufenacet (B.130)

(122) TABLE-US-00056 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY I.1 B.130 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 25 100 65 125 100 80 74 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY MATCH ECHCG I.1 B.130 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 60 15 100 65 20 65 62.5 100 85 65 100 68 80 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY POLCO GERDI MATCH I.1 B.130 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 20 10 15 100 65 10 10 20 31.25 100 85 65 40 28 45 19 55 32 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI VIOAR I.1 B.130 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 70 30 50 10 80 125 50 90 73 98 86 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH ERICA KCHSC APESV I.1 B.130 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 60 10 60 0 50 0 0 0 85 62.5 50 100 60 35 10 65 60 95 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH IPOHE POLCO ALOMY I.1 B.130 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 15 55 20 0 50 10 0 60 10 40 31.25 50 25 19 80 15 98 82 60 28 75 40

Use Example 53

(123) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+cycloxidim

(124) TABLE-US-00057 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GALAP GERDI APESV I.1 cycloxidim found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 70 0 5 25 20 30 125 5 85 74 100 76 35 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH I.1 cycloxidim found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 60 5 65 62.5 5 100 86 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI APESV I.1 cycloxidim found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 0 5 20 30 31.25 5 40 28 55 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR GERDI I.1 cycloxidim found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 30 70 2.5 0 0 125 2.5 80 30 75 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR I.1 cycloxidim found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 20 2.5 0 62.5 2.5 65 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI I.1 cycloxidim found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 10 2.5 0 31.25 2.5 25 10

Use Example 54

(125) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+metsulfuron

(126) TABLE-US-00058 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV I.1 metsulfuron found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 0.25 30 62.5 0.25 40 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG ABUTH I.1 metsulfuron found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 0 0.25 25 80 31.25 0.25 30 25 85 80 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL POLCO I.1 metsulfuron found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 65 0.125 0 30 125 0.125 100 65 100 76 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 metsulfuron found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 65 0.125 20 62.5 0.125 100 72 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GALAP ECHCG MATCH I.1 metsulfuron found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 50 0 0 0.125 20 10 0 0 31.25 0.125 55 20 60 55 30 0 90 0

Use Example 55

(127) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.93 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+sulfentrazone (B.93)

(128) TABLE-US-00059 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL MATCH POLCO I.1 B.93 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 0 65 6 30 50 85 125 6 100 76 100 50 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO I.1 B.93 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 65 3 85 62.5 3 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO MATCH I.1 B.93 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 0 3 85 50 31.25 3 100 85 100 50 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL MATCH APESV ALOMY I.1 B.93 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 0 0 15 1.5 20 0 10 0 125 1.5 85 72 100 0 40 10 25 15 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GALAP APESV ALOMY I.1 B.93 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 80 0 0 1.5 45 10 0 62.5 1.5 98 89 30 10 20 0 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha PAPRH APESV ALOMY I.1 B.93 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 0 0 1.5 70 10 0 31.25 1.5 100 91 30 10 20 0

Use Example 56

(129) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.32 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+imazapic (B.32)

(130) TABLE-US-00060 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL MATCH APESV I.1 B.32 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 0 0 6 65 30 80 125 6 100 88 100 30 85 80 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV I.1 B.32 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 6 80 62.5 6 85 80 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha IPOHE ABUTH I.1 B.32 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 0 6 75 85 31.25 6 98 91 98 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha AMBEL MATCH I.1 B.32 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 0 3 0 0 125 3 100 65 100 0 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY POLCO I.1 B.32 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 65 3 25 85 62.5 3 30 25 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ALOMY APESV I.1 B.32 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 0 0 3 85 25 65 31.25 3 95 85 30 25 70 65

Use Example 57

(131) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.174 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+diflufenzopyr (B.174)

(132) TABLE-US-00061 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH I.1 B.174 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 0 40 70 125 40 100 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha STEME VIOAR I.1 B.174 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 0 40 50 65 31.25 40 80 65 75 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH APESV ALOMY I.1 B.174 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 0 0 15 20 70 0 0 125 20 100 70 35 0 40 15 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha KCHSC ALOMY I.1 B.174 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 85 0 20 65 0 62.5 20 100 95 10 0 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha KCHSC ABUTH POLCO ALOMY I.1 B.174 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 0 0 0 20 65 85 30 0 31.25 20 95 90 90 85 40 30 10 0

Use Example 58

(133) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.123 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+pendimethalin (B.123)

(134) TABLE-US-00062 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA POLCO I.1 B.123 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 75 85 1000 60 65 125 1000 100 90 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.123 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 1000 60 62.5 1000 100 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI I.1 B.123 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 1000 75 31.25 1000 100 91 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.123 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 75 500 30 125 500 100 83 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.123 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 500 30 62.5 500 100 83 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.123 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 500 30 31.25 500 100 79

Use Example 59

(135) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.97 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+clomazone (B.97)

(136) TABLE-US-00063 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY ERICA I.1 B.97 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 75 750 60 65 125 750 95 86 100 97 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY ERICA I.1 B.97 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 25 75 750 60 65 62.5 750 85 70 98 91 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA IPOHE ALOMY I.1 B.97 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 40 0 750 65 45 60 31.25 750 98 90 75 67 70 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.97 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 75 375 50 125 375 100 88 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA ALOMY VIOAR I.1 B.97 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 25 30 375 50 45 85 62.5 375 100 88 75 59 98 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY VIOAR I.1 B.97 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 20 375 45 85 31.25 375 60 45 95 88

Use Example 60

(137) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+halosulfuron methyl

(138) TABLE-US-00064 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against halosulfuron ECHCG I.1 methyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 45 5 45 62.5 5 75 70 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against halosulfuron ALOMY I.1 methyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 5 10 31.25 5 25 10

Use Example 61

(139) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.134 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+S-metolachlor (B.134)

(140) TABLE-US-00065 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA POLCO I.1 B.134 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 75 85 500 35 60 125 500 100 84 100 94 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA ALOMY I.1 B.134 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 75 25 500 35 20 62.5 500 100 84 50 40 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA AMBEL GERDI VIOAR KCHSC I.1 B.134 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 70 75 65 20 80 500 35 65 30 0 30 31.25 500 100 81 100 91 100 76 60 20 100 86 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA POLCO GALAP VIOAR I.1 B.134 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 75 85 65 60 250 25 35 45 0 125 250 100 81 98 90 100 81 65 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha VIOAR I.1 B.134 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 30 250 0 62.5 250 35 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH AMBEL ALOMY I.1 B.134 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 30 75 0 250 40 25 0 31.25 250 70 58 90 81 20 0

Use Example 62

(141) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.1 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+clethodim (B.1)

(142) TABLE-US-00066 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GALAP I.1 B.1 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 95 12 25 0 125 12 98 70 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 B.1 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 12 25 62.5 12 80 63 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GALAP ERICA I.1 B.1 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 50 25 12 25 0 0 31.25 12 55 44 60 50 30 25 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 B.1 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 6 0 125 6 98 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH APESV I. B.1 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 15 6 0 75 62.5 6 80 50 90 79 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH POLCO I.1 B.1 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 65 6 0 0 31.25 6 45 25 98 65

Use Example 63

(143) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.140 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+2,4-D (B.140)

(144) TABLE-US-00067 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALMOY ABUTH VIOAR I.1 B.140 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 20 60 80 62.5 0 85 65 125 62.5 50 20 98 94 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY ABUTH GALAP VIOAR I.1 B.140 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 10 50 90 0 62.5 0 85 0 65 62.5 62.5 20 10 98 93 98 90 70 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO GALAP VIOAR ERICA I.1 B.140 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 50 0 25 62.5 75 0 65 80 31.25 62.5 98 91 65 50 70 65 90 85 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY ABUTH I.1 B.140 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 20 60 31.25 0 35 125 31.25 45 20 90 74 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GALAP VIOAR I.1 B.140 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 90 0 31.25 35 0 60 62.5 31.25 75 68 95 90 65 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO GALAP ERICA ABUTH MATCH I.1 B.140 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 50 25 25 25 31.25 65 0 70 35 0 31.25 31.25 100 88 65 50 85 78 55 51 30 25

Use Example 64

(145) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+quizalofop-p-ethyl

(146) TABLE-US-00068 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against quizalofop- ABUTH I.1 p-ethyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 15 25 125 15 98 70 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against quizalofop- VIOAR I.1 p-ethyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 15 0 62.5 15 30 0 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against quizalofop- PAPRH MATCH ERICA I.1 p-ethyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 65 25 25 15 50 0 20 31.25 15 98 83 55 25 55 40 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against quizalofop- ABUTH VIOAR I.1 p-ethyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 80 7.5 15 0 125 7.5 98 66 98 80 application rate a.i. in g/ha herbicidal activity against quizalofop- ABUTH ERICA I.1 p-ethyl found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 25 25 7.5 15 0 31.25 7.5 45 36 30 25

Use Example 65

(147) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.9 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+profoxydim (B.9)

(148) TABLE-US-00069 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH ALOMY I.1 B.9 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 20 12 40 25 125 12 98 76 50 40 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 B.9 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 50 12 40 62.5 12 98 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV POLCO I.1 B.9 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 65 12 55 0 31.25 12 65 55 70 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH I.1 B.9 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 60 6 0 125 6 98 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV ABUTH I.1 B.9 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 15 50 6 15 0 62.5 6 45 28 60 50 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV ABUTH I.1 B.9 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 0 25 6 15 0 31.25 6 50 15 45 25

Use Example 66

(149) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+thiencarbazone

(150) TABLE-US-00070 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV ERICA I.1 thiencarbazone found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 15 65 0.5 25 85 125 0.5 45 36 100 95

Use Example 67

(151) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+propaquizafop

(152) TABLE-US-00071 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY GALAP KCHSC I.1 propaquizafop found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 25 90 95 10 65 10 10 125 10 100 74 100 91 100 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY POLCO ABUTH I.1 propaquizafop found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 90 85 10 65 0 30 62.5 10 90 65 98 90 98 90 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ALOMY APESV ERICA GALAP KCHSC I.1 propaquizafop found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 25 15 65 90 95 5 55 65 0 0 0 125 5 85 66 85 70 100 65 100 90 100 95 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha APESV POLCO ERICA I.1 propaquizafop found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 0 90 75 5 65 0 0 62.5 5 85 65 98 90 100 75

Use Example 68

(153) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.169 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+quinmerac (B.169)

(154) TABLE-US-00072 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA KCHSC I.1 B.169 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 95 125 75 25 125 125 100 91 100 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA KCHSC ALOMY APESV I.1 B.169 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 95 25 15 62.5 65 10 0 0 125 62.5 100 88 100 96 35 25 25 15 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ECHCG I.1 B.169 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 60 62.5 0 62.5 62.5 80 60

Use Example 69

(155) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+aclonifen

(156) TABLE-US-00073 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA ALOMY I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 35 1000 0 70 125 1000 100 65 90 81 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA MATCH ALOMY I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 70 30 0 1000 0 0 70 62.5 1000 100 70 100 30 80 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO MATCH I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 20 1000 85 0 31.25 1000 100 88 65 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 500 0 125 500 100 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH ALOMY I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 30 0 500 70 0 60 62.5 500 100 87 100 30 70 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH ECHCG POLCO I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 50 20 70 20 500 70 0 80 95 31.25 500 100 85 100 20 100 94 100 96 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA ALOMY ECHCG I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 35 85 250 0 30 50 125 250 100 65 70 55 100 93 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH ALOMY ECHCG GALAP I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 30 0 85 60 250 30 0 30 50 80 62.5 250 100 69 100 30 65 30 100 93 98 92 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO GERDI MATCH ALOMY ERICA I.1 aclonifen found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 50 20 0 50 250 85 30 0 30 90 31.25 250 100 88 100 65 100 20 60 30 100 95

Use Example 70

(157) Synergistic herbicidal action of the composition 1.135 applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+pretilachlor (B.135)

(158) TABLE-US-00074 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 400 20 125 400 100 72 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 30 400 0 0 62.5 400 70 55 100 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GERDI MATCH I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 50 20 400 0 0 0 31.25 400 40 20 65 50 60 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 200 0 125 200 100 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GALAP GERDI MATCH ERICA I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 60 55 30 70 200 0 0 0 0 62.5 200 80 60 100 55 100 30 95 70 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ABUTH MATCH I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 20 20 200 0 0 0 31.25 200 65 20 50 20 40 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 100 0 125 100 100 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 30 100 0 0 62.5 100 85 55 60 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ABUTH GERDI MATCH I.1 B.135 found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 50 20 100 0 0 0 31.25 100 50 20 65 50 40 20

Use Example 71

(159) Synergistic herbicidal action applied by the post emergence method: treatment by the mixture of compound (I.1)+methyl oleate

(160) TABLE-US-00075 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 12 0 125 12 100 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 30 12 0 0 62.5 12 70 55 100 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ABUTH GALAP I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 20 60 12 0 0 0 31.25 12 40 20 30 20 65 60 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 6 0 125 6 90 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha MATCH GERDI I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 30 55 6 0 0 62.5 6 100 30 65 55 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO ABUTH I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 20 6 0 0 31.25 6 95 20 50 20 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha ERICA I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 125 65 3 0 125 3 100 65 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha GERDI MATCH I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 62.5 55 30 3 0 0 62.5 3 70 55 100 30 application rate herbicidal activity against a.i. in g/ha POLCO MATCH I.1 methyloleate found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated found calculated 31.25 20 20 3 0 0 31.25 3 70 20 30 20