Mine roof support

Abstract

A system or method for a structural mine roof support includes a roof support apparatus that includes a cylindrical cladding defining a hollow interior, a plurality of bamboo sections disposed in the hollow interior and coaxial with an axis of the cylinder. Also, a roof support apparatus with a cylindrical cladding defining a hollow interior, a plurality of bamboo sections disposed in the hollow interior and coaxial with an axis of the cylinder, and voids between adjacent bamboo sections, the voids being injected with a filler material, e.g., polyurethane foam, to maintain axial positioning of the bamboo sections when under load. The support apparatus configured to load and to yield in a predetermined fashion to control a mine roof from sudden failure.

Claims

1. A roof support apparatus comprising a cylindrical cladding defining a hollow interior, a plurality of bamboo sections disposed in the hollow interior; the bamboo sections extending coaxial with an axis of the cylinder; wherein each of the plurality bamboo sections comprises a hollow core; and wherein the hollow core having PUR foam filler therein to provide additional strength.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the cylindrical cladding extends longitudinally from a bottom end to a top end of the roof support apparatus.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising at least one void disposed between adjacent bamboo sections.

4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the at least one void comprises a filler material injected therein.

5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the filler material comprises a polyurethane foam.

6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the filler material being injected into the void, the filler material configured to maintain axial positioning of the bamboo sections when the roof support apparatus is placed under a load.

7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the roof support apparatus is configured to yield under a load to control a mine roof from sudden failure.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the roof support cladding comprises a spiral cladding formed from sheet steel with the plurality of bamboo sections having diameters varying from 2.54 cm to 10.16 cm; and wherein the voids in the cladding are filled with PUR around the bamboo.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein at least two bamboo sections are discontinuous over the axial length of the support apparatus; the discontinuous sections being arranged in a plurality of pieces along the axial length.

10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the roof support apparatus is about 30.48 centimeters (cm) (12 inches) in diameter by 152.4 cm long (60 inches) in length and the voids in the cladding include PUR around the bamboo; and wherein the peak tonnage capacity is 96161 kilograms.

11. A roof support apparatus comprising a cylindrical cladding defining a hollow interior, a plurality of bamboo sections disposed in the hollow interior and positioned within the cladding substantially coaxial with an axis of the cladding, wherein the adjacent bamboo sections define a plurality of voids therebetween; wherein each of the plurality bamboo sections comprises a hollow core; and wherein the hollow core having PUR foam filler therein to provide additional strength.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising a filler material injected into the voids.

13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the filler material comprises polyurethane foam.

14. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the filler material is configured to maintain axial positioning of the bamboo sections when the apparatus is placed under load.

15. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising a plurality of lumber sections placed within the cylindrical casing of the roof support adjacent one or more of the plurality of bamboo sections.

16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the plurality of bamboo sections having various sizes.

17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the support apparatus further comprises has a first end and a second end, each of the first and second end substantially open or covered by an end cap; the first end being positioned directly adjacent a mine roof.

18. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the support apparatus further comprises has a first end and a second end, each of the first and second end substantially open or covered by an end cap; the first end being positioned adjacent a mine roof, and comprising a yield ring inserted between the first end and the mine roof; the second end in direct contact with a mine floor or other structure.

19. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the cladding comprises spiral tubing having a predetermined pitch.

20. A roof support apparatus comprising a cylindrical cladding defining a hollow interior, a plurality of bamboo sections disposed in the hollow interior and positioned within the cladding substantially coaxial with an axis of the cladding, wherein the adjacent bamboo sections define a plurality of voids therebetween; and a plurality of lumber sections placed within the cylindrical casing of the roof support adjacent one or more of the plurality of bamboo sections.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) The application will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a partial, cross-sectional elevational view of an exemplary embodiment of a roof support.

(3) FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment of the roof support.

(4) FIG. 3 is an exemplary support having bamboo sections of various diameters disposed within the interior space of cladding.

(5) FIG. 4 is another exemplary embodiment of the roof support with voids filled with PUR foam.

(6) FIG. 5 shows an end view of a roof support with uniform diameter bamboo sections arranged within the external cladding.

(7) FIG. 6 shows a test facility for an exemplary roof support.

(8) FIG. 7 is a graphs of a load profile of one embodiment of the roof support.

(9) FIG. 8 is a graphs of a load profile of a second embodiment of the roof support.

(10) FIG. 9 is another a graphs of a load profile of a third embodiment of the roof support.

(11) FIG. 10 is a graphs of a load profile of a fourth embodiment of the roof support.

(12) FIG. 11 is a graphs of a load profile of a fifth embodiment of the roof support.

(13) FIG. 12 shows an alternate embodiment of a roof support of the present invention, including lumber segments interspersed with bamboo sections.

(14) FIG. 13 is a graphs of a load profile of a sixth embodiment of the roof support.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

(15) Before turning to the figures which illustrate the exemplary embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the application is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the following description or illustrated in the figures. It should also be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting.

(16) Referring to FIG. 1, a partial, cross-sectional elevational view of an exemplary embodiment of a roof support 10 is shown. Roof support 10 includes an external cladding 12, extending longitudinally and defining a hollow interior space filled with multiple bamboo sections 14 placed coaxially within the interior of cladding 12. Bamboo sections 14 having various radii provide voids 16 interspersed within support 10. Voids 16 may be left empty, or may be filled with polyurethane foam or other binders to retain stability or increase load bearing capacity of roof support 10, as will be described in greater detail below.

(17) Referring next to FIG. 2, support 10 has a top end 22 and bottom end 24 and may be substantially open or covered by an end cap. Top end 22 is generally positioned adjacent a mine roof or other load, either directly or with a yield ring inserted between the support and the load, and bottom end 24 in direct contact with a floor or other structure. Cladding 12 has bamboo sections 14 extending substantially the entire length of the support 10. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, cladding 12 may be formed of spiral tubing of a predetermined pitch, e.g., 5 inches (or 12.7 cm), although the pitch of the spiral tubing may be varied to achieve various design criteria for the support 10.

(18) Roof support 10 may be used as a single support or stacked as needed to obtain the desired height. In various embodiments a yield ring, beam, footing or wedges may be inserted on top of the roof support 10 to take up any gap between the roof support 10 and the mine roof or other surface, such that the weight of the mine roof is transferred to the roof support 10. Other shims may include pumpable containment structures (e.g., bags) or a pumpable telescoping structure such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,394,707, incorporated herein by reference.

(19) Referring next to FIG. 3, a support 10 is shown having bamboo sections 14 of various diameters disposed within the interior space 26 of cladding 12. In the embodiment of FIG. 3, bamboo sections 14 include small, medium and large diameter sections interspersed randomly within space 26, so that a majority of the interior space is taken up by bamboo sections 14. This arrangement provides voids between bamboo sections 14, but maintains a generally vertical or coaxial alignment inside cladding 12.

(20) FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of a roof support 10, wherein the voids 16 are filled with PUR foam. The hollow cores 28 of bamboo sections 14 are unfilled, i.e., remain hollow as indicated in FIG. 4, although in other embodiments the hollow cores 28 may also be filled with PUR foam for additional strength if desired.

(21) FIG. 5 shows an end view of a roof support 10 with more uniform diameter bamboo sections 14 arranged within cladding 12. Voids 26 are empty, i.e., air, in FIG. 5, although filler material may be inserted therein if desired. In the embodiments shown in the figures, PUR foam is generally used as filler in voids 26, however other material may be used instead, e.g., pea gravel, sand or other flowable material.

(22) FIG. 6 shows a test facility for an exemplary roof support 10, wherein a load is applied hydraulically to compress the support under extreme load. In FIG. 6 the top section 30 is shown deforming under the applied load, without failing. This configuration simulates a mine roof environment 32 wherein the deformation is controlled to prevent sudden collapse of the mine roof.

(23) FIG. 7 shows a graphical profile of a first exemplary test, showing compressive force versus displacement for a roof support. Support 10 in this test was 12 inch diameter by 60 inch long. The voids in the cladding are filled with PUR around the bamboo. Table 1 below shows the parameters related to FIG. 7. Note that the peak tonnage is indicated as 106 tons, or 212088 lbs. [Metric units 96161 kg].

(24) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sample Number 1 Trigger Force Setting (lb.) 593.8 Specimen ID Spiral Can Scan Number 31 Prop Test Sample Dia. (in.) 12.00 Trigger Time (sec.) 3.100 Water to Solids Ratio 0.00 Trigger Force Actual (lb.) 358.60 Sample Lgth. (in.) 60.00 Trigger Displacement (in.) 0.00319 Cylinder Weight (lb.) 96 Peak Scan Number 1812 Sample Vol. (in.sup.3) 6785.84 Peak Load (lb.) 212088 Sample Vol. (Ft.sup.3) 3.9270 Peak Pressure (psi) 1875 Density (lb./Ft.sup.3) 24.45 Compressive Modulus 74317 (psi) Date Prepared Aug. 7, 18 Extension Test Delta (in.) 1.51399 Date Tested Aug. 8, 2018 Loading Rate (psi/min) 621.0 16:53 Fracture Pattern 0 Peak Strain (%) 2.523 User Defined 8 0.00 Sample Area (in.sup.2) 113.097 UD Ratio 5.000 Correction Factor 1.0000 Total Peak Tons 106

(25) FIG. 8 shows a graphical profile of a second exemplary test with an embodiment of the bamboo support wherein the spiral cladding is formed from 22 gauge sheet steel with South American bamboo in pieces ranging from 1 inch to 4 inches (2.54 to 10.16 cm). The voids in the cladding are filled with PUR around the bamboo. In the embodiment tested some sections of bamboo were not continuous over the length of the support but arranged in pieces along the axial length.

(26) Table 2 below shows the test parameters related to FIG. 8. Note that the peak load for the test parameters was approximately 120 tons.

(27) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Sample Number 2 Trigger Force Setting (lb.) 1745.5 Specimen ID Gauge, SA Scan Number 82 Bamboo 4 in. Sample Dia. (in.) 12.00 Trigger Time (sec.) 8.200 Water to Solids Ratio 0.00 Trigger Force Actual (lb.) 1647.99 Sample Lgth. (in.) 6.00 Trigger Displacement (in.) 0.09144 Cylinder Weight (lb.) 126 Peak Scan Number 1948 Sample Vol. (in.sup.3) 678.58 Peak Load (lb.) 239444 Sample Vol. (Ft.sup.3) 0.3927 Peak Pressure (psi) 1228 Density (lb./Ft.sup.3) 320.86 Compressive Modulus 8853 (psi) Date Prepared Aug. 30, 18 Extension Test Delta (in.) 1.43490 Date Tested Aug. 31, 2018 Loading Rate (psi/min) 652.1 15:05 Fracture Pattern 0 Peak Strain (%) 23.915 User Defined 8 0.00 Sample Area (in.sup.22) 113.097

(28) FIG. 9 shows a graphical profile of a third exemplary test with an embodiment of the bamboo support wherein the spiral cladding is formed from 22 gauge sheet steel with China bamboo with 9 pieces of 3 inch (7.6 cm) diameter and 9 pieces of 2 inch (5.1 cm) diameter, full 6 ft. length sections. The voids in the cladding are filled with PUR around the bamboo. In the embodiment tested some sections of bamboo were not continuous over the length of the support but arranged in pieces along the axial length.

(29) Table 3 below shows the test parameters related to FIG. 9. Note that the peak load for the test parameters was approximately 97.5 tons.

(30) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Sample Number 3 Baseline Force Setting (lb.) 1530.1 Specimen ID Bamboo 9, Baseline Set Scan Number 2 3 inch Sample Dia. (in.) 12.00 Baseline Set Time (sec.) 0.200 Water to Solids 0.00 Baseline Force Actual (lb.) 1554.51 Ratio Sample Lgth. (in.) 72.00 Baseline Displacement (in.) 1.01725 Cylinder Weight 115 Peak Scan Number 1861 (lb.) Sample Vol. (in.sup.3) 8143.01 Peak Load (lb.) 194997 Sample Vol. (Ft.sup.3) 4.7124 Peak Pressure (psi) 1724 Density (lb./Ft.sup.3) 24.40 Compressive Modulus (psi) 62490 Date Prepared Aug. 30, 18 Extension Test Delta (in.) 1.98653 Date Tested Aug. 31, 2018 Loading Rate (psi/min) 555.9 16:35 Fracture Pattern 0 Peak Strain (%) 2.759 User Defined 8 Bamboo from Sample Area (in2) 113.097 CN L/D Ratio 6.000 Correction Factor 1.0000

(31) FIG. 10 shows a graphical profile of a fourth exemplary test with an embodiment of the bamboo support wherein the spiral cladding is formed from 22 gauge sheet steel with South American bamboo with 9 pieces of 3 inch (7.6 cm) diameter and 9 pieces of 2 inch (5.1 cm) diameter, full 6 ft. length sections, with no PUR or other filler. In the embodiment tested some sections of bamboo were not continuous over the length of the support but arranged in pieces along the axial length.

(32) Table 4 below shows the test parameters related to FIG. 10. Note that the peak load for the test parameters was approximately 100 tons.

(33) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Sample Number 4 Baseline Force Setting (lb.) 517.4 Specimen ID BB Same Baseline Set Scan Number 27 number Sample Dia. (in.) 12.00 Baseline Set Time (sec.) 2.700 Water to Solids 0.00 Baseline Force Actual (lb.) 159.50 Ratio Sample Lgth. (in.) 72.00 Baseline Displacement (in.) 0.00034 Cylinder Weight 113 Peak Scan Number 933 (lb.) Sample Vol. (in.sup.3) 8143.01 Peak Load (lb.) 200776 Sample Vol. (Ft.sup.3) 4.7124 Peak Pressure (psi) 1775 Density (lb./Ft.sup.3) 23.98 Compressive Modulus (psi) 169154 Date Prepared Sep. 5, 18 Extension Test Delta (in.) 0.75563 Date Tested Sep. 6, 2018 Loading Rate (psi/min) 1141.6 13:21 Fracture Pattern 0 Peak Strain (%) 1.049 User Defined 8 Same test as Sample Area (in.sup.2) 113.097 Test 3 L/D Ratio 6.000 Correction Factor 1.0000

(34) FIG. 11 shows a graphical profile of a fifth exemplary test with an embodiment of the bamboo support wherein the spiral cladding is formed from 22 gauge sheet steel with South American bamboo, with voids filled with PUR foam having a density of 10 lbs./ft.sup.3. Tests 1 through 3 above used a higher density (20 lbs./ft.sup.3) PUR foam filler material.

(35) Table 5 below shows the test parameters related to FIG. 11. Note that the peak load for the test parameters was approximately 120 tons.

(36) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Sample Number 5 Baseline Force Setting (lb.) 234.5 Specimen ID 22 GA, SA Baseline Set Scan Number 13 Bamboo Sample Dia. (in.) 12.00 Baseline Set Time (sec.) 1.300 Water to Solids 0.00 Baseline Force Actual (lb.) 287.48 Ratio Sample Lgth. (in.) 72.00 Baseline Displacement (in.) 0.00236 Cylinder Weight 122.5 Peak Scan Number 1057 (lb.) Sample Vol. (in.sup.3) 8143.01 Peak Load (lb.) 241386 Sample Vol. (Ft.sup.3) 4.7124 Peak Pressure (psi) 2134 Density (lb./Ft.sup.3) 26.00 Compressive Modulus (psi) 183124 Date Prepared Aug. 7, 18 Extension Test Delta (in.) 0.83916 Date Tested Sep. 7, 2018 Loading Rate (psi/min) 1211.5 13:42 Fracture Pattern 0 Peak Strain (%) 1.166 User Defined 8 d the density Sample Area (in.sup.2) 113.097 down LID Ratio 6.000 Correction Factor 1.0000

(37) As indicated by the test results in FIGS. 6 through 11, and Tables 1 through 5, high strength cylindrical supports or props are achieved using lightweight structural components, i.e., bamboo and PUR foam, which are inexpensive to assemble and transport. This is particularly advantageous in difficult to reach areas such as underground mines. The cladding material disclosed in the exemplary embodiments is made from sheet steel in a spiral configuration, having a pitch of about 5 inches. The invention is not limited to steel cladding, as it is possible to use various materials, such as plastics, tube steel, copper, aluminum or any material capable of being shaped or fabricated as a tubular member. By varying the elastic properties of the cladding, deformation and loading may be controlled in a predetermined profile as set forth in various profiles shown in FIGS. 7 through 11.

(38) The configuration and load capacity of supports may be increased by binding multiple supports together, e.g., three supports 10 may be used in place of conventional timber cribbing. Alternately the cladding may have a larger diameter to achieve an equivalent capacity as the multiple support configuration.

(39) FIG. 13 shows still another graphical profile of a fifth exemplary test with an embodiment of the bamboo support. The support in FIG. 13 was 18 inches in diameter and 72 inches high, with a 5 inch header and footer. Peak vertical load was approximately 270 kips at 3 inches of displacement, and residual load tapered gradually to approximately 145 kips vertical load at 22 inches of displacement. Additional tests on supports of the same dimensions yielded test results ranging from a maximum peak vertical load of approximately 360 kips at 4.5 inches of displacement, to a minimum peak vertical load of approximately 125 kips at 17 inches of displacement. Residual measurements at 22 inches of displacement were between 150 kips and 170 kips.

(40) Referring next to FIG. 12, in an alternate embodiment of a roof support of the present invention, lumber segments 13 interspersed with bamboo sections 14. The placement of inexpensive two-by-four lumber segments 15 within the casing further reduces the cost of materials while substantially maintaining the load capacity of the roof support. Of course sizes and amounts of the mix can be adjusted to provide a mixed matrix for adjustable performances. By way of example and not limitation, dimensions may include two-by-six, two-by-eight, two-by-ten, and similarly configured lumber segments. An optional cap 15 may be inserted at either end of the support 10, or both ends of support to protect the bamboo sections 14 and polyurethane contents within the cladding 12, and to distribute load evenly across the support 10.

(41) While the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the figures and described herein are presently preferred, it should be understood that these embodiments are offered by way of example only. Accordingly, the present application is not limited to a particular embodiment, but extends to various modifications that nevertheless fall within the scope of the appended claims. The order or sequence of any processes or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments.

(42) It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the mine roof/structural support as shown in the various exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited in the claims. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present application. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. In the claims, any means-plus-function clause is intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present application.

(43) It should be noted that although the figures herein may show a specific order of method steps, it is understood that the order of these steps may differ from what is depicted. Also two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence. Such variation will depend on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. It is understood that all such variations are within the scope of the application. Likewise, software implementations could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule based logic and other logic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps, comparison steps and decision steps.