Electrochemical sensor for detection of heavy metal ions, and methods of preparation thereof

Abstract

A surface modified electrode and a method of preparing the surface modified electrode are provided. The surface modified electrode includes a glassy carbon electrode and a coating of a compound of formula I disposed on the glassy carbon electrode. The present disclosure also relates to a method of preparing the surface modified electrode. The method includes depositing a slurry of the compound of Formula I on the glassy carbon electrode to form a film and coating a polymer matrix on the film to obtain the surface modified electrode. The present disclosure also relates to a method of preparing the compound of Formula I. The method includes condensing 4-bromobenzaldehyde (4-BBD) and 4-methyl-benzenesulphonylhydrazine (4-MBSH), to obtain a first mixture and precipitating the first mixture to obtain the compound of Formula I. The surface modified electrode is used in an electrochemical sensor for the detection of metal ions. ##STR00001##

Claims

1. A surface modified electrode configured to indicate contact with cadmium ions (Cd.sup.+2), comprising: a glassy carbon electrode; and a coating of a compound of Formula I, bound to the glassy carbon electrode by a polymer matrix, the compound of Formula I carrying a chemical information that changes in response to contact with Cd.sup.+2 ions, by a change amount that is selective to Cd.sup.+2 ions relative to interfering ions, the Formula 1 being ##STR00005##

2. The surface modified electrode according to claim 1, wherein the polymer matrix is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene-based fluoropolymer (nafion).

3. A method of preparing the surface modified electrode according to claim 2, the method comprising: depositing a slurry of a compound of Formula I on a glassy carbon electrode to form a film; and ##STR00006## coating a polymer matrix on the film to obtain the surface modified electrode.

4. The method according to claim 3 further comprising, depositing the slurry of the compound of Formula I on the glassy carbon electrode for a period of 1-4 hours.

5. The method according to claim 3 further comprising, coating the polymer matrix on the film at a temperature range of 35 to 45° C. for a period of 2-4 hours.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) A more complete appreciation of this disclosure and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

(2) FIG. 1A is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a method for preparing the compound of Formula I (E)-N′-(4-Bromobenzyledene)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonohydrazide;

(3) FIG. 1B is an exemplary flowchart illustrating a method for preparing the surface modified electrode;

(4) FIG. 2A is .sup.1H-NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectra of the compound of Formula I;

(5) FIG. 2B is .sup.13C-NMR of the compound of Formula I;

(6) FIG. 3A shows a Fourier-Transfer Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectrum of the compound of Formula I;

(7) FIG. 3B shows ultraviolet (UV) spectrum of the compound of Formula I;

(8) FIG. 4A shows a Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) diagram with 50% probability of thermal ellipsoids in single crystal X-ray diffractometers (SCXRDM) analysis;

(9) FIG. 4B is the ORTEP diagram depicting hydrogen bonding pattern of the compound of Formula I (SCXRDM analysis);

(10) FIG. 5 shows a view along a-axis of Hirshfeld surface (SCXRDM analysis) mapped on normalized mode (d.sub.norm);

(11) FIG. 6A-6E depicts a two dimensional fingerprint plot and contribution of interaction of individual or all contributing atoms in the compound of Formula I (SCXRDM analysis);

(12) FIG. 7 depicts a proposed electrochemical mechanism of cadmium ions at the surface modified electrode, and also depicts outcomes of I-V experimental results;

(13) FIG. 8A is a voltammogram depicting the effect of pH on the surface modified electrode in the presence of cadmium ions within a pH range of 5.7-8.0;

(14) FIG. 8B is a voltammogram comparing the electrochemical behavior with different electrodes: i) a bare electrode (glassy carbon electrode), ii) glassy carbon electrode with a polymer matrix (nafion) and iii) the surface modified electrode, in sensing cadmium ions;

(15) FIG. 8C illustrates a I-V graph depicting the selectivity of the surface modified electrode towards various metal ions;

(16) FIG. 8D is a control experiment comparing the sensing ability of cadmium ions at 1 μM concentration with different electrodes: i) a bare electrode (glassy carbon electrode), ii) glassy carbon electrode with a polymer matrix (nafion) and iii) the surface modified electrode, in sensing cadmium ions;

(17) FIG. 9 depicts electrochemical responses with the electrochemical sensor in presence of various cations along with cadmium ion;

(18) FIG. 10 depicts a comparative FT-IR spectra of the surface modified electrode before the detection of cadmium ions, and after the detection of cadmium ions;

(19) FIG. 11A is an I-V graph depicting the effect of concentration of cadmium ions on current change with the surface modified electrode;

(20) FIG. 11B shows a calibration plot obtained from FIG. 12A vs. cadmium ions concentration;

(21) FIG. 11C shows a linear dynamic range plot with an error limit of 10%;

(22) FIG. 11D shows a response time of cadmium ions towards the electrochemical sensor;

(23) FIG. 12A shows the reproducibility response of the surface modified electrode for sensing cadmium ions;

(24) FIG. 12B shows the repeatability response of the surface modified electrode for sensing cadmium ions;

(25) FIG. 13A is a plot depicting interference of other metal ions (interfering metal ions) in detecting cadmium ion with the surface modified electrode;

(26) FIG. 13B shows a bar diagram depicting current change response to the interfering metal ions at +1.0 V with an error limit of 10.0%;

(27) FIG. 14A is an I-V graph determining cadmium ion concentration from various samples with the electrochemical sensor of the present disclosure; and

(28) FIG. 14B is a bar diagram determining cadmium ion concentration from various samples with the electrochemical sensor at +1.0 V with an error limit of 10.0%.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(29) Reference will now be made in detail to specific embodiments or features, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. A skilled artisan will appreciate that various alternate embodiments and forms may be prepared. Examples, therefore, given are only for illustration purposes without any intention to restrict the embodiments to a given set of examples. Specific functional aspects are provided merely to enable a person skilled in the art to perform the invention and should not be construed as limitations of the invention. Any method steps, and processes described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps may be employed, unless otherwise indicated.

(30) As used herein, “a surface modified electrode” refers to an electrode that has its surface modified for different electrochemical functions.

(31) As used herein, “working electrode” refers to the electrode in an electrochemical cell/device/sensor on which the electrochemical reaction of interest is occurring.

(32) As used herein, “counter-electrode”, is an electrode used in an electrochemical cell for voltametric analysis or other reactions in which an electric current is expected to flow.

(33) As used herein, an “analyte” is a substance whose chemical constituents are being identified and measured.

(34) As used herein, an “electrochemical sensor” converts the information associated with electrochemical reactions (the reaction between the surface modified electrode and the analyte) into an applicable qualitative or quantitative signal.

(35) The term “glassy carbon” refers herein to a non-graphitizing carbon which combines glassy and ceramic properties with those of graphite.

(36) As used herein, “limit of detection (LOD)” is the smallest concentration of an analyte in a test sample that can be easily distinguished from zero.

(37) As used herein, “limit of quantification (LoQ)” is the smallest concentration of an analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable repeatability and accuracy.

(38) As used herein, “linear dynamic range (LDR)” is the range of concentrations where the signals are directly proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the sample.

(39) As used herein, “selectivity” is the quality of the electrochemical response that can be achieved without interference for any other substance.

(40) As used herein, “sensitivity” is the change in the electrochemical response with regard to a change in the concentration of the analyte.

(41) As used herein, a “voltammogram” is a graph that can be drawn after an electrochemical experiment. This graph has a typical, recognizable form in which the electron flow (current: I) is measured in Volt against the potential (E).

(42) As used herein, “amount” refers to the level or concentration of one or more reactants, catalysts, present in a reaction mixture.

(43) The use of the singular herein includes the plural (and vice versa) unless specifically stated otherwise.

(44) The use of the terms “include,” “includes”, “including,” “have,” “has,” or “having,” “comprise,” “comprises,” “comprising” or the like should be generally understood as open-ended and non-limiting unless specifically stated otherwise.

(45) It is understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain actions can be changed so long as the intended result is obtained. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.

(46) As used herein, the term “about” or “between” refers to a ±20% to ±10% variation from the nominal value unless otherwise indicated.

(47) Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed towards a surface modified electrode. The surface modified electrode consists of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified/fabricated with the compound of Formula I. The compound of Formula I is (E)-N′-(4-Bromobenzyledene)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonohydrazide (4-BBMBSH). The surface modified electrode when implemented in an electrochemical sensor functions as a working electrode, and is effective in detection of metal ions with high selectivity, sensitivity, across a wide concentration range, with a short response time. In an embodiment, the metal ion is a heavy metal ion, like cadmium. The electrochemical characteristics of the surface modified electrode were found to be much superior in comparison to the bare electrode or the glassy carbon electrode. Although, the present disclosure describes the use of the electrochemical sensor for detection of metal ions like cadmium, the sensor of the present disclosure may be adapted for detection of other metal ions as well.

(48) Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to the surface modified electrode. The surface modified electrode includes a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) coated with the compound of Formula I disposed on the glassy carbon electrode. The compound of Formula I is also referred to as (E)-N′-(4-Bromobenzyledene)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonohydrazide (4-BBMBSH).

(49) ##STR00003##

(50) In an embodiment, the compound of Formula I may be disposed across the length of the glassy carbon electrode with a uniform thickness or may be disposed on portions of the glassy carbon electrode. The chemical modification/fabrication of the glassy carbon electrode with the compound of Formula I may be done by any conventional methods known in the art. The chemical modification of the GCE with the compound of Formula I may result in formation of reactive groups on its surface. The surface modified electrode further includes a polymer matrix configured to bind the glassy carbon electrode with the compound of Formula I. In an embodiment, the nature of bonding between the compound of Formula I and the glassy carbon electrode, facilitated through the polymer matrix, is a covalent bond. In another example, the nature of bonding between the compound of Formula I and the glassy carbon electrode is physical adsorption. In one embodiment, the polymer matrix is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene-based fluoropolymer (nafion or NFN). In an embodiment, the surface modified electrode is NFN/4-BBMBSH/GCE.

(51) The surface modified electrode can be used in an electrochemical sensor or “sensor” as a working electrode for detection of metal ions, particularly heavy metal ions. The sensor includes two electrodes, namely, the surface modified electrode or the working electrode, and a platinum wire as a counter-electrode. Although the present disclosure describes a 2-electrode system (the working electrode and the counter-electrode) in the sensor, the system may be adapted to have 3-electrodes or 4-electrodes, or multi-electrodes to detect one or more metal ions. In an example, the working electrode and the counter-electrode are connected to each other by way of electrical interconnects that allow for the passage of current between the electrodes, when a potential is applied between them. In an embodiment, the working electrode and the counter-electrode can have the same or different dimensions. In certain embodiments, the working electrode has a cross-section diameter of 1.68 millimeters, and the counter-electrode as a cross-section diameter of 0.2 millimeters. The working electrode and the counter-electrode may be arranged as readily understood and appreciated by a person of ordinary skill in the art. In an embodiment, the electrode configuration of the electrochemical sensor may be designed based on the type of metal ion to be sensed and the type of detection methodology.

(52) The electrochemical sensor having the surface modified electrode can be used to detect a metal ion. In certain embodiments, the metal ion may be one or more selected from a group consisting of the metal ion is selected from a group consisting of Cd.sup.2+, Ce.sup.2+, Co.sup.2+, Mn.sup.2+, K.sup.+, and Na.sup.+. In one embodiment, the metal ion is cadmium. Although embodiments of the present disclosure are directed towards detection of cadmium ion, it may be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art that the electrochemical sensor may be adapted for detection of other metal ions as well.

(53) The electrochemical sensor becomes operable when the metal ion is brought in contact with the working electrode. A chemical reaction between the working electrode and the metal ion occurs causing a change in chemical information associated with the metal ion. In an embodiment, the change in chemical information could be a change in oxidation state. In other words, the metal ion may undergo a redox (oxidation-reduction) reaction resulting in loss or gain of electrons, when it is brought in contact with the working electrode. In another embodiment, the change in chemical information could be a complex formation. The electrochemical sensor is configured to determine a change in chemical information caused by the metal ion on contact with at least a portion of the surface modified electrode, and further transduce the change in chemical information associated with the metal ion to an electrical signal. In certain embodiments, the electrical signal is indicative of a concentration level of the metal ion in a sample. In some embodiment, the sample may be solid, gas or liquid. Therefore, greater the concentration of the metal ion, the stronger is the electrical signal. In one embodiment, the metal ion is selected from a group consisting of Cd.sup.2+, Ce.sup.2+, Co.sup.2+, Mn.sup.2+, K.sup.+, and Na.sup.+. In another embodiment, the metal ion is cadmium ion. The reactive functional groups present on the surface of the chemically modified electrode, allows for detection of cadmium with high selectivity at a short response time, owing to its high reactivity to cadmium ions. In an embodiment, the electrochemical sensor is configured to detect cadmium across a concentration range of about 8 pM. In another embodiment, the electrochemical sensor is configured to detect cadmium across a concentration range of about 10 pM. In yet another embodiment, the electrochemical sensor is configured to detect cadmium across a concentration range of about 12 pM. Electrochemical sensor analytical parameters such as sensitivity, and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the electrochemical sensor towards Cd.sup.2+ were found from the calibration curve as 2.21519 nAμM.sup.−1 cm.sup.−2, and 334.29 mM respectively.

(54) Referring to FIG. 1A, a method for preparing the surface modified electrode is described. In an embodiment, the method 100 includes depositing a slurry of a compound of Formula I on a glassy carbon electrode to form a film (102). In one embodiment, the slurry includes a mixture of the compound of formula I and alcohol. In another embodiment, the alcohol is a lower alcohol, such as ethanol. In some embodiments, the glassy carbon electrode may be cleaned with water and acetone before deposition of the slurry. The method includes depositing the slurry of the compound of Formula I on the glassy carbon electrode for a period of 1-4 hours (102). The method further includes coating a polymer matrix on the film to obtain the surface modified electrode (104). In one embodiment, the method includes coating the polymer matrix on the film at a temperature range of 35 to 45° C. for a period of 2-4 hours. In one embodiment, the polymer matrix is a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene-based fluoropolymer (nafion or NFN). In certain embodiments, the polymer matrix may be added to the glassy carbon electrode in a drop-wise manner and kept open in the air so as to synchronize coating development.

(55) Referring to FIG. 1B, a method for preparing the compound of Formula I is described. The method (150) includes condensing 4-bromobenzaldehyde (4-BBD) and 4-methyl-benzenesulphonylhydrazine (4-MBSH), to obtain a first mixture (152). In one embodiment, the first mixture may include alcohol. In another embodiment, the alcohol may be ethanol. 4-BBD and 4-MBSH have a molar ratio of 1:1. In one embodiment, the method includes condensing 4-BBD and 4-MBSH at a temperature range of about 20° C.-37° C. for a period of about 2.5-4 hours. In another embodiment, condensing 4-4-BBD and 4-MBSH at a temperature range of about 24° C.-33° C. for a period of about 2.9-3.6 hours. In yet another embodiment, condensing 4-BBD and 4-MBSH at a temperature range of about 28° C.-29° C. for a period of about 3.2-3.4 hours. The method further includes precipitating the first mixture to obtain the compound of Formula I (154).

(56) The surface modified electrode used in the electrochemical sensor allows for detection of cadmium ions in environmental samples with higher selectivity, sensitivity, good reliability with a short response time.

EXAMPLES

(57) It is understood that the examples, embodiments, and teachings presented in this application are described merely for illustrative purposes. Any variations or modifications thereof are to be included within the scope of the present application as discussed.

(58) Materials and Methods

(59) Analytical grade chemicals for example 4-BBD, 4-MBSH, AgNO.sub.3, Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3, AuCl.sub.3, CaCl.sub.2), CdSO.sub.4, CuSO.sub.4, FeCl.sub.3, MgCl.sub.2, ZnSO.sub.4, EtOH, NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4, Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, and NF (5.0 weight % in water and a lower aliphatic alcohol that contains 45.0% water) were purchased from the Sigma Aldrich, Saudi Arabia. A stock solution of metal ions (100.0 mM and 10.0 mL) was prepared from the corresponding purchased chemical with distilled water (10.0 mL). .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR spectra were recorded on an ASCEND NMR machine (400 MHz) at 300 k with chemical shifts at parts per million with estimable solvent response as a reference. FT-IR spectrum was reported as neat on a NICOLET iS50 FT-IR spectrometer. UV-Visible study was carried out using Evolution 300 UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Thermo scientific). I-V examination was conducted with the detection of Cd.sup.2+ detection in a selective point by means of NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor using Keithley electrometer.

(60) A new sulfonylhydrazone containing halogen atom was crystallized under slow evaporation for the purpose of structure elucidation, confirmation, and screened under microscope towards selection of an excellent sample. Selected needle like sample pasted over fiber glass absorbed into wax and supported with concave copper tube having magnetic base. This sample holder was mounted on Agilent super nova diffractometer outfitted with micro-focus (Cu—Mo Kα) emission for data collection and it was accomplished using Crys-Alis-Pro software at 296° K. Figures generation and refinement of the 4-BBMBSH molecule (non-hydrogen atoms) was performed using PLATON, ORTEP, and SHELXL-97 in-built with WinGX and Olex2 respectively. Aromatic carbon-hydrogen and methyl-hydrogen were positioned geometrically and treated as riding atoms with C—H=0.93 and 0.96 Å having Uiso=1.2 and 1.5 Ueq for hydrogen and carbon atoms correspondingly. N—H atoms were located through Fourier map and refined with N—H=0.82(6)−0.86 (2) Å with Uiso=1.2 Ueq for nitrogen atom. Crystal data of 4-BBMBSH molecule may be received upon application in free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.

Example 1: Process of Preparation of 4-BBMBSH

(61) A reaction mixture of 4-bromobenzaldehyde (501.8 mg, 2.71 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 4-methylbenzenesulfonylhydrazine (506.2 mg, 2.72 mmol, and 1.0 equiv) was added in EtOH (35.0 mL) and kept on constant stirring at room temperature for 3.0 h. The reaction mechanism is provided in Scheme 1 below. White precipitate was collected from the settled solution by removing the solvent with pipette slowly. Cold MeOH (20.0 mL) was added with the obtained precipitate and kept again at room temperature for evaporation of the solvent. Found precipitate was crystallized in MeOH to obtain 4-BBMBSH molecule as a white crystal (321.3 mg, 34.0%).

(62) EF=C.sub.14H.sub.13BrN.sub.2O.sub.2S, MW=353.23, Elemental analysis=C-47.60, H-3.71, Br-22.62, N-7.93, O-9.06, S-9.08.

(63) .sup.1H-NMR (400 MHz and DMSO-d6) δ: 11.54 (s, 1H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.80-7.73 (m, 2H), 7.67-7.56 (m, 2H), 7.56-7.47 (m, 2H), 7.42 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H). (FIG. 2A) .sup.13C-NMR (101 MHz and DMSO-d6) δ: 145.76, 143.55, 136.00, 132.88, 131.78, 129.67, 128.58, 127.16, 123.30, 20.96 (FIG. 2B). FTIR (neat) v.sub.max=3194, 1600, 1468, 1345, 1198, 1078, 965, 800, 655, 600, 560, 505 (FIG. 3A). UV (DMSO, λ.sub.max)=285 nm (FIG. 3B).

(64) Scheme 1

(65) ##STR00004##

Example 2: Preparation and Modification of GCE with the Compound of Formula I (4-BBMBSH Molecule)

(66) A series of phosphate buffer from low acidic to basic pH (5.7, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0) were prepared from NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4 and Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4 in distilled water. The quantity of phosphate buffer phase (10.0 mL) is kept constant throughout the entire analysis. GCE was initially cleaned with distilled water and acetone consequently and kept in open air (1.0 h) to dry completely. Prepared slurry (4-BBMBSH+EtOH) was deposited on the dried surface of GCE and kept again at open air (1.0 h) for drying. 5% nafion (NFN) is added onto the dried GCE electrodes in a drop wise manner. It is then placed again in open air (1.30 h) for synchronizing the thin-film growth in air. The surface modified GCE electrode was used as a working electrode, and Pt wire was used as a counter electrode successively to records the current-voltage signals of the metal ion determination.

(67) Results and Discussion

(68) Spectroscopic Studies of 4-BBMBSH Molecule

(69) The 4-BBMBSH molecule was characterized and the structure was confirmed by means of single crystal X-ray diffraction method (SCXRDM). One N—H proton of the marked 4-BBMBSH molecule showed singlet at δ 11.54. A multiplet and one singlet were observed at δ 7.89-7.42 and 2.37 respectively indicating aromatic and three methyl protons in desired 4-BBMBSH molecule (FIG. 2A). According to .sup.13C-NMR spectra, a good number of carbon atoms were present in the aromatic area (FIG. 2B) in 4-BBMBSH.

(70) FT-IR spectroscopy was recorded for the functional groups in the structure (compound of Formula I or 4-BBMBSH) at 4000-400 cm.sup.−1, the results can be observed in FIG. 3A. From the FIG. 3A it can be observed that the functional groups are presence, which confirmed the formation of the compound of Formula I. UV-Visible spectrum was also conducted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 200-800 nm and λ.sub.max was found at 285.0 nm (as can be observed in FIG. 3B) which is the outcome of the π-π* change of the C═NH group in the molecule 4-BBMBSH.

(71) Van-der Waal's interactions give the more stability to the crystal structure of molecule and affect the physicochemical properties. Homologous structure of 4-BBMBSH was resolved with P−1 space group in triclinic model (FIG. 4A and Table 1). Distorted tetrahedral geometry around the S atoms is due to the different angles around it [<O1-S1-C8=108.8 (2)°, <O1-S1-N2=109.5 (2)°, <O2-S1-C8=109.6 (2)°, <O2-S1-N2=102.0 (2)°, <N2-S1-C8=106.7 (2)° and <O1-S1-02=119.45 (2)° ]. The τ.sub.4 was calculated following the formula, τ.sub.4=[360−(α+β)]/141, α and β are the largest angles around the sulphur atom, which is 0.929, confirming that the geometry of the molecule is distorted tetrahedral. A dihedral angle of 82.99 (1)° was found among the aromatic rings of the compound (FIG. 5A). Intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions in 4-BBMBSH generate different ring motifs [R.sub.2.sup.2(10) & R.sub.2.sup.2(16)] [39] and these interactions connect themselves to generate two different ring motifs and produce long chain along β-axis (FIG. 4B and Table 2).

(72) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Molecular structure data and refinement of 4-BBMBSH Parameters 4-BBMBSH CCDC 1585514        ID 17073      Empirical formula C.sub.14H.sub.13BrN.sub.2O.sub.2S Formula weight 353.23 Crystal system Triclinic Temperature/K   296 (2) a/Å 5.9923 (6)  b/Å 9.5124 (10) c/Å 13.0082 (14)  Space group P-1 α/° 97.697 (9)  β/° 95.705 (9)  γ/° 92.144 (9)  Volume/Å.sup.3 730.19 (13) ρ.sub.calcmg/mm.sup.3    1.607 Z 2  μ/mm.sup.−1   2.96 Crystal size/mm.sup.3 0.48 × 0.09 × 0.06 F(000) 356    2θ range for data collection 6.356 ~ 58.142° Index ranges −5 ≤ h ≤ 8, −10 ≤ k ≤ 11, −15 ≤ 1 ≤ 17 Independent reflections 3354 [R(int) = 0.0378] Reflections collected 5104     Data/restraints/parameters 3354/0/182 Goodness-of-fit on F.sup.2    1.013 Final R indexes [I >= 2σ (I)] R.sub.1 = 0.0704 and wR.sub.2 = 0.1454 Largest diff. peak/hole/e 0.51/−0.47 Å.sup.−3 Final R indexes [all data] R.sub.1 = 0.1289 and wR.sub.2 = 0.1695 Flack parameter —

(73) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Hydrogen bonding pattern of 4-BBMBSH molecule 4-BBMBSH D H A d(H-A)/Å d(D-H)/Å D-H-A/° d(D-A)/Å N2 H1N O2.sup.1 2.2  0.86 141.1 2.922(6) C14 H14C O2.sup.2 2.58 0.96 148.5 3.439(8) .sup.11-X, 1-Y, -Z; .sup.21-X, -Y, -Z

(74) Bond length has been calculated for 4-BBMBSH; the results are presented in Table 3.

(75) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Bond lengths of 4-BBMBSH 4-BBMBSH Atom Atom Length/Å Atom Atom Length/Å Br1  C4 1.902(6)  C1  C2 1.381(8) S1 O1 1.425(4)  C1  C6 1.387(8) S1 O2 1.442(4) C12 C13 1.378(8) S1 C8 1.757(5) C12 C11 1.380(8) S1 N2 1.626(5) N1  C7 1.277(7) C8  C9 1.385(7)  C3  C4 1.363(9) C8 C13 1.381(7)  C3  C2 1.379(8) C5  C4 1.382(9)  C9 C10 1.388(8) C5  C6 1.361(9) C11 C10 1.371(8) N2 N1 1.382(6) C11 C14 1.501(8) C1  C7 1.454(8) — — — Br1  C4 1.902(6)  C1  C2 1.381(8) S1 O1 1.425(4)  C1  C6 1.387(8)

(76) Bond angle has been calculated for 4-BBMBSH; the results are presented in Table 4.

(77) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Bond angles of 4-BBMBSH 4-BBMBSH Atom Atom Atom Angle/° Atom Atom Atom Angle/° O1 S1 O2 119.4(2) C7 N1 N2 114.2(4) O1 S1 C8 108.8(2) C4 C3 C2 119.1(6) O1 S1 N2 109.5(2) C8 C9 C10 119.2(5) O2 S1 C8 109.6(2) C12 C13 C8 118.7(5) O2 S1 N2 102.0(2) N1 C7 C1 122.7(5) N2 S C8 106.7(2) C12 C11 C14 120.6(6) C9 C8 S1 118.8(4) C10 C11 C12 119.0(6) C13 C8 S1 120.5(4) C10 C11 C14 120.4(6) C13 C8 C9 120.7(5) C11 C10 C9 120.8(5) C6 C5 C4 119.2(6) C5 C4 Br1 119.3(5) N1 N2 S1 119.4(3) C3 C4 Br1 120.0(5) C2 C1 C7 123.6(5) C3 C4 C5 120.7(6) C2 C1 C6 117.2(6) C3 C2 C1 121.8(6) C6 C1 C7 119.1(5) C5 C6 C1 122.0(6) C13 C12 C11 121.6(6)

(78) The Hirschfield surface analysis of the compound of Formula I has been measured to understand the intermolecular interactions (FIG. 5). The measurement was done using Crystal-Explorer 17.5 and FIG. 5 shows the normalized contact distance (d.sub.norm) map as well as the hydrogen bonding interactions. This (d.sub.norm) map clearly suggests that there is N—H . . . O type hydrogen bonding interaction (Table 1). The map also shows represent the hydrogen donor and hydrogen acceptor regions on molecule under study (FIG. 5). The two dimensional finger print plots were also studied and it is found that H—H contact is a major contributing factor in the Hirschfield surface generation (38.3%), as can be observed in the FIG. 6A. The contributing portions for O—H/H—O, C—H/H—C, and Br—H/H—Br are 18.8%, 13.9%, and 12%, respectively (FIG. 6B-6E).

(79) Electrochemical Application of NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE Sensor

(80) FIG. 7 depicts a proposed electrochemical mechanism of cadmium at surface modified electrode, and also depicts outcomes of I-V experimental results. The electrode (GCE) was fabricated with the compound of Formula I with the polymer matrix to function as a sensor (NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor) for metal ion detection. The sensor was further examined for the selective detection of the target metal ion, particularly cadmium, in phosphate buffer. Electrochemical response of the sensor was dynamically altered due to adsorption of Cd.sup.2+, possibly through the formation of 4-BBMBSH-Cd.sup.2+ complex. This change in chemical information (loss of electrons) caused by Cd.sup.2+ on contact with at least a portion of the working electrode causes the sensor to transduce the change in chemical information associated with Cd.sup.2+ to an electrical signal. Further, real electrical responses of Cd.sup.2+ are investigated by simple and reliable I-V technique with electrode of the present disclosure, which can be observed in FIG. 7. A significant amplification in the current response with applied potential is noticeably confirmed. This is possibly due to the presence of reactive functional groups present on the surface modified electrode that causes adsorption of cadmium ion with improved sensitivity, and enhanced the current responses against potential during the I-V measurement at room conditions.

(81) pH is an important factor affecting the performance of surface modified electrode. The effect of pH of cadmium ion on the sensing ability of the surface modified electrode was further evaluated, and the results of this experiment are presented in FIG. 8A. Electochemical analysis with the sensor was examined in phosphate buffer (amount=10.0 ml) at various pH conditions—ranging from lower acidic to little basic condition (pH=5.7-8.0). The pH was adjusted using chemicals known in the art. All other process parameters were kept identical while performing the experiment. The current response at different pH was noted. From FIG. 8A, it can be observed that although the electrochemical sensor is effective in detection of cadmium ion at a wide range of pH values, best results were observed at a slightly acidic or neutral pH values. A higher electrical response was recorded at pH=6.5 with the sensor of the present disclosure. From these findings it is evident that the electrode exhibits superior sensitivity with enhanced current response at pH 6.5, because of the higher rate of electron transfer at pH 6.5.

(82) Further, the current response of the surface modified electrode was compared to that of a bare/uncoated electrode (bare GCE), and GCE coated with nafion. The results of this study are presented in FIG. 8B. The current response was found to be the strongest with the fabricated electrode, in comparison the bare/uncoated electrode (bare GCE), and GCE coated with nafion.

(83) One of the most essential and desirable features of an electrochemical sensor lies in its ability to distinguish the metal ion of interest, from other metal ions, even at very low concentrations, from interfering chemicals. In other words, the electrochemical sensor ought to be selective and sensitive. To assess the selectivity of the electrode, metal ions (25.0 μL and 1.0 μM) such as Ag.sup.+, Al.sup.3+, Au.sup.3+, Ca.sup.2+, Cd.sup.2+, Cu.sup.2+, Fe.sup.3+, Mg.sup.2+, and Zn.sup.2+ in phosphate buffer phase (pH=6.5, 10.0 mL, and 100.0 mM) was investigated. The results of this study are presented in FIG. 8C. From the FIG. 8C, it can be observed that although the selectivity towards iron and aluminium ions was found to be moderate, best amperometric response was observed, given all other reaction conditions kept constant, was observed with the cadmium ions at applied potential range of 0.1-1.5 V.

(84) A control experimentation at 25.0 μL and 1.0 μM cadmium ion was performed in phosphate buffer (10.0 mL, pH=6.5, and 100.0 mM) with the bare/uncoated electrode (bare GCE), GCE coated with nafion, and NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor. The results of this study are presented in FIG. 8D. From the FIG. 8D, it can be observed that a highest current response was observed with the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor in comparison with other sensors confirming the superiority of the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor.

(85) FIG. 9 depicts the influence of other cations in the presence of cadmium ions; the electrochemical responses are observed with the electrochemical sensor. In presence of other cations, the sensor response was found to be almost similar, not same. The performance of the sensor for its ability to detect cadmium in the presence of an other cations like lead, zinc, magnesium, copper, iron, and calcium was studied. The current response was found to be similar with each study, despite the presence of other cations, suggesting that the selectivity of the sensor towards cadmium.

(86) The FT-IR is an analytical technique based on the interaction with the functional groups in 4-BBMBSH compound with any other metal ions. FT-IR measurement of the surface modified electrode was preformed before and after adding of cadmium ion and the results were compared, as can be observed in FIG. 10. In the FT-IR, absorptions are exhibited by the fundamental vibrations of the —CH, —NH, —OH, —SH groups, among others. The FT-IR region can lead to quantitative analysis, since the absorbance of the 4-BBMBSH sample is proportional to the number of functional groups. Here, the interaction of existing functional groups in 4-BBMBSH contributing to the formation of absorption bands at specific wave-numbers are compared and indicated in the same spectrum. After interaction/detection of cadmium ions, the absorption bands of functional groups in 4-BBMBSH compound were found to be slightly changed or shifted to the higher energy level, indicating or confirming the interaction between the functional groups and the cadmium ion.

(87) FIG. 11A is an I-V graph depicting the effect of concentration of cadmium ion on current change with the surface modified electrode. Electrical signals at various concentrations (100.0 pM˜100.0 mM) towards NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor were examined, which is a function of concentration of Cd.sup.2+ under electrochemical method. It was marked that the change in current response was proportional to the concentration of cadmium ion. In other words, it can be observed from the FIG. 11A that a gradual change in current response was observed by increasing the concentration of Cd.sup.2+[SD=2.54, RSD=38.27% at +1.4 V, n=10]. Electrochemical analysis was performed with Cd.sup.2+ at various concentrations, at an applied potential between 0˜+1.5 V to discover the apparent analytical limits. Calibration curve was found linear at +1.0 V (R.sup.2=0.9540, SD=2.34, n=10, and error limit=10.0%) at different Cd.sup.2+ concentrations (FIG. 11B). Sensor parameters such as sensitivity, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated from calibration curve (+1.0 V) using the equations (i-iii) and found as 2.21519 nAμM.sup.−1 cm.sup.−2, 334.29 mM, and 10.03 pM correspondingly. Linear dynamic range, LDR (10.0 nM˜10.0 μM) was also found linear (R.sup.2=0.9652) from the calibration plot (FIG. 11C). Response time of Cd.sup.2+ was found 8.0 s at 1.0 μM and 25.0 μL in buffer phase (10.0 mL, pH=6.5, and 100.0 mM) towards NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor (FIG. 11D). Here, electrochemical characteristic of the 4-BBMBSH is analyzed as a function of Cd.sup.2+ concentration at room conditions, where improved resultant current response at a higher concentration. As obtained, the current response of the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE film is significantly increased (π-π* interaction) with the increasing concentration of selective Cd.sup.2+, however similar phenomena for toxic chemical detection have also been reported elsewhere. For a low concentration of Cd.sup.2+ in liquid medium, there is a smaller surface coverage of Cd.sup.2+ on NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE film and hence the surface reaction proceeds steadily. By increasing the Cd.sup.2+ concentration, the surface reaction is increased significantly (gradually increased the response as well) due to active surface area (NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE) contacted with Cd.sup.2+. Further increasing of Cd.sup.2+ concentration on MPEBSH/GCE surface, it is exhibited a more rapid increased the current responses, due to larger surface area covered by Cd.sup.2+ as well as π-π interaction of the nitrogen and oxygen containing functional groups. The π-π interaction could be approaches as inter-molecular and intra-molecular interactions of the 4-BBMBSH.

(88) $\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{Sensitivity}=\frac{m}{A}& \left(i\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}LOD=\frac{\left(3\times SD\right)}{m}& \left(\mathrm{ii}\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}LOQ=\frac{\left(10\times SD\right)}{m}& \left(\mathrm{iii}\right)\end{array}$
Evaluation of NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE Sensor Performances

(89) Sensing efficiency of the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor was evaluated up to few days regarding estimation of the reproducible (RP) parameter. Consequently, seven successive runs of Cd.sup.2+ (25.0 μL and 1.0 μM) response was examined at identical conditions in phosphate buffer (10.0 mL, pH=6.5, and 100.0 mM) using different electrodes. Best results were observed with the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor (RP=67.0%, SD=0.61, RSD=30.06% at +1.0 V, and n=7), the results of which are presented in FIG. 12A and Table 5.

(90) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Sensor probe examination at calibrated potential Reproducibility, Repeatability, Repli- Current RP (%) Current RA (%) cates (μA) Individual Average (μA) Individual Average 1 3.00 100 1.40 100 2 2.30 77 1.26 90 3 1.32 44 1.08 77 4 1.85 62 67 1.07 76 80 5 1.30 43 0.98 70 6 1.96 65 1.09 78 7 2.39 80 0.97 69
Here, the reproducibility and repeatability of replicate 1 has been considered to be 100%.

(91) Current responses of the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor were also measured with respect of storage time for the detection of extended storage susceptibility. An appreciation of storage ability of the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor was examined at (1.0 μM and ˜25.0 μL) in phosphate buffer (10.0 mL, pH=6.5, and 100.0 mM) under standard condition using the surface modified electrode, as well as the repeatability (RA) at calibrated potential (+1.0 V) was found 80.0% towards Cd.sup.2+, [SD=0.15, RSD=13.76%, and n=7] (FIG. 12B and Table 5).

(92) An analytical parameter (i.e., sensitivity) remained almost similar in each measurement up too few days and after that the responses of the NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor become decreased slowly. It was noticeably reported that the proposed sensor can be used without any primary response in sensitivity up to few days. A comparison of Cd.sup.2+ detection using different sensors is investigated and presented here in Table 6.

(93) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Detection of Cd.sup.2+ using different sensor matrix with various recognized methods LOD LDR Sensors Methods Sensitivity (μg/L) (μg/L) SnO.sub.2QD/GE CV — ~500 5000- 45000 BF/GCE SWASV — 0.3 1-170 SB/PME POT — 5.6 8.9- 11240000 MWCNT-SB/CPE SWASV — 0.74  1-1200 Calix[4]arene/PME POT — 179.8 179.8- 1124000 — SWASV — 1.0 10-50   p-allylcalix DPV — 2.2 10-300  [4]arene/GCE NDG/GCE DPSV — 3.4 5.6-1011  Cd-llP/CPE DPASV — 0.15 ≈ 0.5-40    NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE I-V 2.21519 10.03 pM 10.0~10.0 (nAμM.sup.−1cm.sup.−2) (nM~μM) QD: Quantum dots, BF: Bismuth film, SB; Schiff base, CV: Cyclic voltammetry, SWASV: Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry, POT: Potentiometry, DVP: Differential pulse voltammetry, DPSV: Differential pulse stripping voltammetry, DPASV: Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry, GE: Gold electrode, GCE: Glassy carbon electrode, PME: Polymeric membrane electrode, CPE: Carbon paste electrode, and I-V: Current-voltage.
Assessment of Interference Effect

(94) FIG. 13A is a plot depicting interference analysis of the surface modified electrode in the presence of other interfering metal ions. Interference examination is one of the most important validation technique in analytical science in order to assess the differences between the interfering metal ions (IMI) having similar cationic nature. Ce.sup.2+, Co.sup.2+, Mn.sup.2+, K.sup.+ and Na.sup.+ are generally used as IMI in the detection of Cd.sup.2+ in electrochemically. Current responses of NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor toward the addition of Cd.sup.2+ (1.0 μM and ˜25.0 μL) and IMI such as Ce.sup.2+, Co.sup.2+, Mn.sup.2+, K.sup.+ and Na.sup.+ (10.0 μM and ˜25.0 μL) in PB (10.0 mL, pH=6.5, and 100.0 mM) were examined by using the fabricated electrode. Interference effect of interfering metal ions towards Cd.sup.2+ was calculated at the calibrated potential (+1.0 V), where the interference effect of Cd.sup.2+ was considered to be 100.0% (FIG. 13A and Table 7). It was marked that NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor didn't show any notable responses towards the interfering metal ions in identical conditions. Therefore, the proposed sensor (NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE) is good and efficient for the detection of selective Cd.sup.2+ ions with good results. FIG. 13B shows a bar diagram depicting current change response to the interfering biomolecules at +1.0 V with an error limit of 10.0%.

(95) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Study of interference effect for various metal ions with NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor probe by electrochemical method in identical conditions Observed current (μA) SD RSD % IMI R1 R2 R3 Average IEE (%) (n = 3) (n = 3) Cd.sup.2+ 7.12 4.02 3.47 4.87 100 1.97 40.41 Ce.sup.2+ 3.42 3.08 3.02 3.17 65 0.22 6.80 Co.sup.2+ 3.00 2.81 2.77 2.86 59 0.12 4.30 Mn.sup.2+ 2.86 2.56 2.51 2.64 54 0.19 7.16 K.sup.+ 2.86 2.73 2.70 2.76 57 0.09 3.08 Na.sup.+ 2.75 2.64 2.62 2.67 55 0.07 2.62
Examination of Environmental Samples

(96) FIG. 14A is an I-V graph determining cadmium ion concentration from various samples with the electrochemical sensor of the present disclosure. For this purpose, groups of natural samples such as coal water (CW), industrial effluent (IE), red sea water (RSW), tap water (TW), and well water (WW) were analyzed with NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor for determining cadmium ion concentration in natural samples on the basis of a standard addition technique. A fixed quantity (˜25.0 μL) of each natural sample in phosphate buffer phase (10.0 mL, pH=6.5, and 100.0 mM) was analyzed by using the fabricated NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor. Concentration was calculated at the calibrated potential (+1.0 V) for detection of Cd.sup.2+ in CW, IE, RSW, TW, and WW by the electrochemical method as it is easy, reliable, and acceptable for analyzing of natural samples (FIG. 14B). It was observed that the concentration of cadmium in red sea water was found comparable with other natural samples (FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B and Table 8). The results establish that current-voltage procedure might be a good experimentation tool for the determination of cadmium ion concentration from natural samples.

(97) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Real samples analysis with NF/4-BBMBSH/GCE sensor probe by electrochemical method Observed current (μA) Concentration SD RSD % NS R1 R2 R3 Average (μM) (n = 3) (n = 3) CW 2.89 1.46 1.14 1.83 0.76 0.93 50.92 IE 2.17 0.93 0.72 1.28 0.53 0.78 61.54 RSW 5.02 3.35 3.14 3.84 1.59 1.03 26.85 TW 2.03 1.94 2.08 2.02 0.83 0.07 3.52 WW 2.26 0.83 0.67 1.25 0.52 0.88 69.85 NS: Natural samples, CW: Coal water, IE: Industrial effluent, RSW: Red sea water, TW: Tap water, WW: Well water, R: Reading, SD: Standard deviation, and RSD: Relative standard deviation.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

(98) The electrochemical sensor of the present disclosure offers several advantages over the prior art for detection of cadmium. One advantage of the embodiments according to the present disclosure is that the electrochemical sensor shows good reliability, reproducibility, and stability under ambient conditions. Also, the sensor shows a better electrical response than the uncoated GEC. Yet another advantage of the embodiments of the present disclosure is the good detectability, high sensitivity, and high selectivity for cadmium ions. Enhanced electro-catalytic property in detecting cadmium, handy nature, good reproducibility, wide LDR, high sensitivity, and low LOD, makes this electrochemical sensor an excellent choice for the detection of cadmium.

(99) It is understood that the examples, embodiments and teachings presented in this application are described merely for illustrative purposes. Any variations or modifications thereof are to be included within the scope of the present application as discussed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

(100) The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number “2021-035” and King Abdulaziz University, DSR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.