Non-color shifting multilayer structures and protective coatings thereon
10870740 ยท 2020-12-22
Assignee
Inventors
- Songtao Wu (Ann Arbor, MI)
- Khoa Vo (Ypsilanti, MI, US)
- Debasish Banerjee (Ann Arbor, MI)
- Masahiko Ishii (Okazaki, JP)
- Alberto Argoitia (Santa Rosa, CA)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
An omnidirectional structural color pigment having a protective coating. The pigment has a first layer of a first material and a second layer of a second material, the second layer extending across the first layer. In addition, the pigment reflects a band of electromagnetic radiation having a predetermined full width at half maximum (FWHM) of less than 300 nm and a predetermined color shift of less than 30 when the pigment is exposed to broadband electromagnetic radiation and viewed from angles between 0 and 45. The pigment has a weather resistant coating that covers an outer surface thereof and reduces a relative photocatalytic activity of the pigment by at least 50%.
Claims
1. An omnidirectional structural color pigment having a protective coating comprising: a pigment having a reflector layer, a dielectric layer with a thickness of less than 2.0 quarter wave (QW) of a desired reflected center wavelength extending across said reflector layer and an absorber layer extending across said dielectric layer, said reflector layer, dielectric layer and absorber layer being substantially planar layers, said pigment reflecting a single band of visible electromagnetic radiation having a predetermined full width at half maximum (FWHM) of less than 200 nm and a predetermined color shift of less than 30 when said pigment is exposed to broadband electromagnetic radiation and viewed from angles between 0 and 45; a weather resistant coating comprising an oxide layer covering an outer surface of said pigment and reducing a photocatalytic activity of said pigment by at least 50% compared to said pigment not having said weather resistant coating.
2. The omnidirectional structural color pigment having a protective coating of claim 1, wherein said oxide layer is selected from the group consisting of silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, titanium oxide and cerium oxide. wherein said weather resistant coating has an oxide layer.
3. The omnidirectional structural color pigment having a protective coating of claim 2, wherein said weather resistant coating has a first oxide layer and a second oxide layer, said second oxide layer being different from said first oxide layer.
4. The omnidirectional structural color pigment of claim 3, wherein said second oxide layer is a hybrid oxide layer that is a combination of two different oxides.
5. The omnidirectional structural color pigment of claim 4, wherein said first oxide layer is silicon oxide and said second oxide layer from at least two of the group consisting of silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, titanium oxide and cerium oxide.
6. The omnidirectional multilayer structural color pigment of claim 1, wherein said pigment does not contain an oxide layer.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(43) An omnidirectional structural color is provided. The omnidirectional structural color has the form of a multilayer thin film (also referred to as a multilayer stack herein) that reflects a narrow band of electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum and has a small or non-noticeable color shift when the multilayer thin film is viewed from angles between 0 to 45 degrees. The multilayer thin film can be used as pigment in a paint composition, a continuous thin film on a structure and the like.
(44) The multilayer thin film includes a multilayer stack that has a first layer and a second layer extending across the first layer. In some instances, the multilayer stack reflects a narrow band of electromagnetic radiation that has a FWHM of less than 300 nm, preferably less than 200 nm and in some instances less than 150 nm. The multilayer thin film also has a color shift of less than 50 nm, preferably less than 40 nm and more preferably less than 30 nm, when the multilayer stack is exposed to broadband electromagnetic radiation, e.g. white light, and viewed from angles between 0 and 45 degrees. Also, the multilayer stack may or may not have a separate reflected band of electromagnetic radiation in the UV range and/or the IR range.
(45) The overall thickness of the multilayer stack is less than 2 m, preferably less than 1.5 m, and still more preferably less than 1.0 m. As such, the multilayer stack can be used as paint pigment in thin film paint coatings.
(46) The first and second layers can be made from dielectric material, or in the alternative, the first and/or second layer can be made from an absorbing material. Absorbing materials include selective absorbing materials such as Cu, Au, Zn, Sn, alloys thereof, and the like, or in the alternative colorful dielectric materials such as Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, Cu.sub.2O, combinations thereof, and the like. The absorbing material can also be a non-selective absorbing material such as Cr, Ta, W, Mo, Ti, Ti-nitride, Nb, Co, Si, Ge, Ni, Pd, V, ferric oxides, combinations or alloys thereof, and the like. The thickness of an absorbing layer made from selective absorbing material is between 20-80 nm whereas the thickness of an absorbing layer made from non-selective absorbing material is between 5-30 nm.
(47) The multilayer stack can also include a reflector layer which the first layer and the second layer extend across, the reflector layer made from metals such as Al, Ag, Pt, Cr, Cu, Zn, Au, Sn, alloys thereof, and the like. The reflector layer typically has a thickness between 30-200 nm.
(48) The multilayer stack can have a reflected narrow band of electromagnetic radiation that has the form of a symmetrical peak within the visible spectrum. In the alternative, the reflected narrow band of electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum can be adjacent to the UV range such that a portion of the reflected band of electromagnetic radiation, i.e. the UV portion, is not visible to the human eye. In the alternative, the reflected band of electromagnetic radiation can have a portion in the IR range such that the IR portion is likewise not visible to the human eye.
(49) Whether the reflected band of electromagnetic radiation that is in the visible spectrum borders the UV range, the IR range, or has a symmetrical peak within the visible spectrum, multilayer thin films disclosed herein have a reflected narrow band of electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum that has a low, small or non-noticeable color shift. The low or non-noticeable color shift can be in the form of a small shift of a center wavelength for a reflected narrow band of electromagnetic radiation. In the alternative, the low or non-noticeable color shift can be in the form of a small shift of a UV-sided edge or IR-sided edge of a reflected band of electromagnetic radiation that borders the IR range or UV range, respectively. Such a small shift of a center wavelength, UV-sided edge and/or IR-sided edge is typically less than 50 nm, in some instances less than 40 nm, and in other instances less than 30 nm when the multilayer thin film is viewed from angles between 0 and 45 degrees.
(50) In addition to the above, the omnidirectional structural color in the form of a multilayer thin film can be in the form of a plurality of pigment particles with a protective coating thereon. As such, a weather resistant pigment is provided. The protective coating can include one or more oxide layers that reduce the relative photocatalytic activity of the pigment particles. The oxide layer can be any oxide layer known to those skilled in the art, illustratively including a silicon oxide layer, an aluminum oxide layer, a zirconium oxide layer, a titanium oxide layer, a cerium oxide, combinations thereof and the like. In some instances, the protective coating includes a first oxide layer and a second oxide layer. In addition, the first oxide layer and/or the second oxide layer can be a hybrid oxide layer, i.e. an oxide layer that is a combination of two different oxides. Also, and as noted above, the pigment itself can be in the form of a multilayer thin film that does not contain an oxide layer.
(51) A process for producing the omnidirectional structural color pigment may or may not include the use of an acid, an acidic compound, acidic solution, and the like. Stated differently, the plurality of omnidirectional structural color pigment particles may or may not be treated in an acidic solution. Additional teachings and details of the omnidirectional structural color pigment and a process for manufacturing the pigment are discussed later in the instant document.
(52) Turning now to
(53) In sharp contrast,
(54)
(55)
(56) With respect to the present invention, three generations of design and manufacture of omnidirectional structural color thin films are disclosed.
First Generation
(57) Referring now to
(58)
(59) Not being bound by theory, one method or approach for designing and manufacturing a desired multilayer stack is the following.
(60) When electromagnetic radiation impacts a material surface, waves of the radiation can be reflected from or transmitted through the material. Furthermore, when electromagnetic radiation impacts the first end 12 of the multilayer structure 10 at the angle .sub.0, the reflected angles the electromagnetic waves make with the surface of the high and low refractive index layers are .sub.H and .sub.L, respectively. Using Snell's law:
n.sub.0 Sin .sub.0=n.sub.L Sin .sub.L=n.sub.H Sin .sub.H(1)
the angles .sub.H and .sub.L can be determined if the refractive indices n.sub.H and n.sub.L are known.
(61) Regarding omnidirectional reflectivity, a necessary but not sufficient condition for the TE mode and the TM mode of electromagnetic radiation requires the maximum angle of refraction (.sub.H,MAX) inside the first layer to be less than the Brewster angle (.sub.B) of the interface between the first layer and the second layer. If this condition is not satisfied, the TM mode of the electromagnetic waves will not be reflected at the second and all subsequent interfaces and thus will transmit through the structure. Using this consideration:
(62)
Thereby requiring:
(63)
(64) In addition to the necessary condition represented by Equation 4, if electromagnetic radiation of wavelength falls on a multilayer structure with an angle .sub.0, and the individual bi-layers of the multilayer structure have thicknesses d.sub.H and d.sub.L with respective refractive indices n.sub.H and n.sub.L, the characteristic translation matrix (F.sub.T) can be expressed as:
(65)
which can also be expressed as:
(66)
and where:
(67)
In addition,
(68)
Solving .sub.T explicitly for TE and TM:
(69)
(70) A viewing angle dependent band structure can be obtained from a boundary condition for the edge, also known as the bandedge, of the total reflection zone. For the purposes of the present invention, bandedge is defined as the equation for the line that separates the total reflection zone from the transmission zone for the given band structure.
(71) A boundary condition that determines the bandedge frequencies of the high reflectance band can be given by:
Trace|F.sub.T|=1(16)
Thus, from equation 3:
(72)
or expressed differently:
(73)
Combining equations 15 and 7, the following bandedge equation is obtained:
(74)
Where:
L.sub.+=n.sub.Hd.sub.H Cos .sub.H+n.sub.Ld.sub.L Cos .sub.L(20)
and:
L=n.sub.Hd.sub.H Cos .sub.Hn.sub.Ld.sub.L Cos .sub.L(21)
The + sign in the bandedge equation shown above represents the bandedge for the long wavelength (.sub.long) and the sign represents the bandedge for the short wavelength (.sub.short). Recompiling equations 20 and 21:
(75)
for the TE mode, and:
(76)
for the TM mode.
(77) An approximate solution of the bandedge can be determined by the following expression:
L.sub.=n.sub.Hd.sub.H Cos .sub.Hn.sub.Ld.sub.L Cos .sub.L0(24)
This approximate solution is reasonable when considering a quarter wave design (described in greater detail below) and optical thicknesses of the alternating layers chosen to be equal to each other. In addition, relatively small differences in optical thicknesses of the alternating layers provide a cosine close to unity. Thus, equations 23 and 24 yield approximate bandedge equations:
(78)
for the TE mode and:
(79)
for the TM mode.
(80) Values for L.sub.+ and .sub.TM as a function of incident angle can be obtained from equations 7, 8, 14, 15, 20 and 21, thereby allowing calculations for .sub.long and .sub.short in the TE and TM modes as a function of incident angle.
(81) The center wavelength of an omnidirectional reflector (.sub.c), can be determined from the relation:
.sub.c=2(n.sub.Hd.sub.H Cos .sub.H+n.sub.Ld.sub.L Cos .sub.L)(27)
The center wavelength can be an important parameter since its value indicates the approximate range of electromagnetic wavelength and/or color spectrum to be reflected. Another important parameter that can provide an indication as to the width of a reflection band is defined as the ratio of range of wavelengths within the omnidirectional reflection band to the mid-range of wavelengths within the omnidirectional reflection band. This range to mid-range ratio () is mathematically expressed as:
(82)
for the TE mode, and:
(83)
for the TM mode. It is appreciated that the range to mid-range ratio can be expressed as a percentage and for the purposes of the present invention, the term range to mid-range ratio and range to mid-range ratio percentage are used interchangeably. It is further appreciated that a range to mid-range ratio value provided herein having a % sign following is a percentage value of the range to mid-range ratio. The range to mid-range ratios for the TM mode and TE mode can be numerically calculated from equations 28 and 29 and plotted as a function of high refractive index and low refractive index.
(84) It is appreciated that to obtain the narrow omnidirectional band that the dispersion of the center wavelength must be minimized. Thus, from equation 27, the dispersion of the center wavelength can be expressed as:
(85)
where:
(86)
and F.sub.c, the center wavelength dispersion factor can be expressed as:
(87)
(88) Given the above, a multilayer stack with a desired low center wavelength shift (.sub.c) can be designed from a low index of refraction material having an index of refraction of n.sub.L and one or more layers having a thickness of d.sub.L and a high index of refraction material having an index of refraction of n.sub.H and one or more layers having a thickness of d.sub.H.
(89) In particular,
(90) As shown in
Second Generation
(91) Referring now to
(92) For example,
(93) In particular,
Third Generation
(94) Referring to
(95) Such a design as illustrated in
(96) For example,
(97) Regarding calculation of a zero or near-zero electric field point,
(98) For a single dielectric layer, .sub.s=.sub.F and the energy/electric field (E) can be expressed as E(z) when z=d. From Maxwell's equations, the electric field can be expressed for s polarization as:
(d)={u(z),0,0}exp(iky)|.sub.z=d(34)
and for p polarization as:
(99)
where
(100)
and is a desired wavelength to be reflected. Also, =n.sub.s sin .sub.s where s corresponds to the substrate in
|E(d)|.sup.2=|u(z)|.sup.2exp(2iky)|.sub.z=d(36)
for s polarization and
(101)
for p polarization.
(102) It is appreciated that variation of the electric field along the Z direction of the dielectric layer 4 can be estimated by calculation of the unknown parameters u(z) and v(z) where it can be shown that:
(103)
Naturally, i is the square root of 1. Using the boundary conditions u|.sub.z=01, v|.sub.z=0=q.sub.s, and the following relations:
q.sub.s=n.sub.s cos .sub.s for s-polarization(39)
q.sub.s=n.sub.s/cos .sub.s for p-polarization(40)
q=n cos .sub.F for s-polarization(41)
q=n/cos .sub.F for p-polarization(42)
=k.Math.n.Math.d cos(.sub.F)(43)
u(z) and v(z) can be expressed as:
(104)
Therefore:
(105)
for s polarization with =k.Math.n.Math.d cos(.sub.F), and:
(106)
for p polarization where:
(107)
(108) Thus for a simple situation where .sub.F=0 or normal incidence, =k.Math.n.Math.d, and =0:
(109)
which allows for the thickness d to be solved for, i.e. the position or location within the dielectric layer where the electric field is zero.
(110) Referring now to
(111) It is appreciated that some percentage of light within +/10 nm of the desired 434 nm will pass through the CrZnS interface. However, it is also appreciated that such a narrow band of reflected light, e.g. 434+/10 nm, still provides a sharp structural color to a human eye.
(112) The result of the Cr absorber layer in the multilayer stack in
(113) In contrast, the solid line in
(114) Regarding omnidirectional behavior of the multilayer structure shown in
(115) In order to overcome the higher angular variance for red color, the instant application discloses a unique and novel design/structure that affords for a red color that is angular independent. For example,
(116) Turning now to
(117) It is appreciated that the relatively large shift in .sub.c for the red color compared to the blue color is due to the dark red color hue space being very narrow and the fact that the Cr absorber layer absorbs wavelengths associated with a non-zero electric field, i.e. does not absorb light when the electric field is zero or near-zero. As such,
(118) In particular,
(119) Based on the above, a proof of concept multilayer stack structure was designed and manufactured. In addition, calculation/simulation results and actual experimental data for the proof of concept sample were compared. In particular, and as shown by the graphical plot in
(120) A list of simulated and/or actually produced multilayer stack samples is provided in the Table 1 below. As shown in the table, the inventive designs disclosed herein include at least 5 different layered structures. In addition, the samples were simulated and/or made from a wide range of materials. Samples that exhibited high chroma, low hue shift and excellent reflectance were provided. Also, the three and five layer samples had an overall thickness between 120-200 nm; the seven layer samples had an overall thickness between 350-600 nm; the nine layer samples had an overall thickness between 440-500 nm; and the eleven layer samples had an overall thickness between 600-660 nm
(121) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Ave. Chroma Max. (0-45) h (0-65) Reflectance Sample Name 3 layer 90 2 96 3-1 5 layer 91 3 96 5-1 7 layer 88 1 92 7-1 91 3 92 7-2 91 3 96 7-3 90 1 94 7-4 82 4 75 7-5 76 20 84 7-6 9 layer 71 21 88 9-1 95 0 94 9-2 79 14 86 9-3 90 4 87 9-4 94 1 94 9-5 94 1 94 9-6 73 7 87 9-7 11 layer 88 1 84 11-1 92 1 93 11-2 90 3 92 11-3 89 9 90 11-4
(122) Turning now to
(123) The sharp increase in reflectance provided by the omnidirectional reflector is characterized by an IR-sided edge of each curve that extends from a low reflectance portion at wavelengths greater than 500 nm up to a high reflectance portion, e.g. >70%. A linear portion 200 of the IR-sided edge is inclined at an angle () greater than 60 relative to the x-axis, has a length L of approximately 50 on the Reflectance-axis and a slope of 1.2. In some instances, the linear portion is inclined at an angle greater than 70 relative to the x-axis, while in other instances is greater than 75. Also, the reflection band has a visible FWHM of less than 200 nm, and in some instances a visible FWHM of less than 150 nm, and in other instances a visible FWHM of less than 100 nm. In addition, the center wavelength .sub.c for the visible reflection band as illustrated in
(124) It is appreciated that the term visible FWHM refers to the width of the reflection band between the IR-sided edge of the curve and the edge of the UV spectrum range, beyond which reflectance provided by the omnidirectional reflector is not visible to the human eye. In this manner, the inventive designs and multilayer stacks disclosed herein use the non-visible UV portion of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum to provide a sharp or structural color. Stated differently, the omnidirectional reflectors disclosed herein take advantage of the non-visible UV portion of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum in order to provide a narrow band of reflected visible light, despite the fact that the reflectors may reflect a much broader band of electromagnetic radiation that extends into the UV region.
(125) Turning now to
(126)
(127) The sharp increase in reflectance provided by the omnidirectional reflector is characterized by a UV-sided edge of each curve that extends from a low reflectance portion at wavelengths below 550 nm up to a high reflectance portion, e.g. >70%. A linear portion 200 of the UV-sided edge is inclined at an angle () greater than 60 relative to the x-axis, has a length L of approximately 40 on the Reflectance-axis and a slope of 1.4. In some instances, the linear portion is inclined at an angle greater than 70 relative to the x-axis, while in other instances is greater than 75. Also, the reflection band has a visible FWHM of less than 200 nm, and in some instances a visible FWHM of less than 150 nm, and in other instances a visible FWHM of less than 100 nm. In addition, the center wavelength .sub.c for the visible reflection band as illustrated in
(128) It is appreciated that the term visible FWHM refers to the width of the reflection band between the UV-sided edge of the curve and the edge of the IR spectrum range, beyond which reflectance provided by the omnidirectional reflector is not visible to the human eye. In this manner, the inventive designs and multilayer stacks disclosed herein use the non-visible IR portion of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum to provide a sharp or structural color. Stated differently, the omnidirectional reflectors disclosed herein take advantage of the non-visible IR portion of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum in order to provide a narrow band of reflected visible light, despite the fact that the reflectors may reflect a much broader band of electromagnetic radiation that extends into the IR region.
(129) Referring now to
(130) As shown in
(131) Another definition or characterization of a reflector's omnidirectional properties can be determined by the shift of a side edge for a given set of angle refection bands. For example, and with reference to
(132) With reference to
(133) Naturally a zero shift, i.e. no shift at all (S.sub.i=0 nm; i=IR, UV), would characterize a perfectly omnidirectional reflector. However, omnidirectional reflectors disclosed herein can provide a S.sub.L of less than 50 nm, which to the human eye can appear as though the surface of the reflector has not changed color and thus from a practical perspective the reflector is omnidirectional. In some instances, omnidirectional reflectors disclosed herein can provide a S.sub.i of less than 40 nm, in other instances a S.sub.i of less than 30 nm, and in still other instances a S.sub.i of less than 20 nm, while in still yet other instances a S.sub.i of less than 15 nm. Such a shift in S.sub.i can be determined by an actual reflectance versus wavelength plot for a reflector, and/or in the alternative, by modeling of the reflector if the materials and layer thicknesses are known.
(134) The shift of an omnidirectional reflection can also be measured by a low hue shift. For example, the hue shift of pigments manufactured from multilayer stacks according an embodiment of the present invention is 30 or less, as shown in
(135) In summary, a schematic illustration of an omnidirectional multilayer thin film according to an embodiment of the present invention in which a first layer 110 has a second layer 120 extending thereacross is shown in
(136) The first layer 110 and second layer 120 can be dielectric layers, i.e. made from a dielectric material. In the alternative, one of the layers can be an absorbing layer, e.g. a selective absorbing layer or a non-selective absorbing layer. For example, the first layer 110 can be a dielectric layer and the second layer 120 can be an absorbing layer.
(137)
(138)
(139) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Refractive Index Materials Refractive Index Materials (visible region) (visible region) Refractive Refractive Material Index Material Index Germanium (Ge) 4.0-5.0 Chromium (Cr) 3.0 Tellurium (Te) 4.6 Tin Sulfide (SnS) 2.6 Gallium Antimonite (GaSb) 4.5-5.0 Low Porous Si 2.56 Indium Arsenide (InAs) 4.0 Chalcogenide glass 2.6 Silicon (Si) 3.7 Cerium Oxide (CeO.sub.2) 2.53 Indium Phosphate (InP) 3.5 Tungsten (W) 2.5 Gallium Arsenate (GaAs) 3.53 Gallium Nitride (GaN) 2.5 Gallium Phosphate (GaP) 3.31 Manganese (Mn) 2.5 Vanadium (V) 3 Niobium Oxide (Nb.sub.2O.sub.3) 2.4 Arsenic Selenide (As.sub.2Se.sub.3) 2.8 Zinc Telluride (ZnTe) 3.0 CuAlSe.sub.2 2.75 Chalcogenide glass + Ag 3.0 Zinc Selenide (ZnSe) 2.5-2.6 Zinc Sulfide (ZnS) 2.5-3.0 Titanium Dioxide (TiO.sub.2)- 2.36 Titanium Dioxide (TiO.sub.2)- 2.43 solgel vacuum deposited Alumina Oxide (Al2O3) 1.75 Hafnium Oxide (HfO.sub.2) 2.0 Yttrium Oxide (Y2O3) 1.75 Sodium Aluminum Fluoride 1.6 (Na3AlF6) Polystyrene 1.6 Polyether Sulfone (PES) 1.55 Magnesium Fluoride 1.37 High Porous Si 1.5 (MgF2) Lead Fluoride (PbF2) 1.6 Indium Tin Oxide nanorods 1.46 (ITO) Potassium Fluoride (KF) 1.5 Lithium Fluoride (LiF4) 1.45 Polyethylene (PE) 1.5 Calcium Fluoride 1.43 Barium Fluoride (BaF2) 1.5 Strontium Fluoride (SrF2) 1.43 Silica (SiO2) 1.5 Lithium Fluoride (LiF) 1.39 PMMA 1.5 PKFE 1.6 Aluminum Arsenate (AlAs) 1.56 Sodium Fluoride (NaF) 1.3 Solgel Silica (SiO2) 1.47 Nano-porous Silica (SiO2) 1.23 N,N bis(1naphthyl)- 1.7 Sputtered Silica (SiO2) 1.47 4,4Diamine (NPB) Polyamide-imide (PEI) 1.6 Vacuum Deposited Silica 1.46 (SiO2) Zinc Sulfide (ZnS) 2.3 + Niobium Oxide (Nb.sub.2O.sub.5) 2.1 i(0.015) Titanium Nitride (TiN) 1.5 + i(2.0) Aluminum (Al) 2.0 + i(15) Chromium (Cr) 2.5 + i(2.5) Silicon Nitride (SiN) 2.1 Niobium Pentoxide (Nb2O5) 2.4 Mica 1.56 Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) 2.36 Polyallomer 1.492 Hafnium Oxide (HfO2) 1.9-2.0 Polybutylene 1.50 Fluorcarbon (FEP) 1.34 Ionomers 1.51 Polytetrafluro-Ethylene 1.35 Polyethylene (Low Density) 1.51 (TFE) Fluorcarbon (FEP) 1.34 Nylons (PA) Type II 1.52 Polytetrafluro- 1.35 Acrylics Multipolymer 1.52 Ethylene (TFE) Chlorotrifiuoro- 1.42 Polyethylene 1.52 Ethylene (CTFE) (Medium Density) Cellulose Propionate 1.46 Styrene Butadiene 1.52-1.55 Thermoplastic Cellulose Acetate Butyrate 1.46-1.49 PVC (Rigid) 1.52-1.55 Cellulose Acetate 1.46-1.50 Nylons (Polyamide) 1.53 Type 6/6 Methylpentene Polymer 1.485 Urea Formaldehyde 1.54-1.58 Acetal Homopolymer 1.48 Polyethylene 1.54 (High Density) Acrylics 1.49 Styrene Acrylonitrile 1.56-1.57 Copolymer Cellulose Nitrate 1.49-1.51 Polystyrene 1.57-1.60 (Heat & Chemical) Ethyl Cellulose 1.47 Polystyrene 1.59 (General Purpose) Polypropylene 1.49 Polycarbornate (Unfilled) 1.586 Polysulfone 1.633 SnO2 2.0
(140) Methods for producing the multilayer stacks disclosed herein can be any method or process known to those skilled in the art or one or methods not yet known to those skilled in the art. Typical known methods include wet methods such as sol gel processing, layer-by-layer processing, spin coating and the like. Other known dry methods include chemical vapor deposition processing and physical vapor deposition processing such as sputtering, electron beam deposition and the like.
(141) The multilayer stacks disclosed herein can be used for most any color application such as pigments for paints, thin films applied to surfaces and the like.
(142) As stated above, omnidirectional structural color pigments having a protective/weather resistant coating are provided. For example, and turning to
(143)
(144) In order to better teach the invention but not limit its scope in any way, examples of weather resistant omnidirectional structural color pigments and a process protocols to produce such pigments is discussed below.
(145) Protocol 17-Layer Pigments Etched with Phosphoric Acid and Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer
(146) A suspension containing 10 g of 7-layer design pigments dispersed in 110 ml of acetone had 0.13 ml of phosphoric acid (85%) added thereto and was stirred for 30 minutes at room temperature. The suspension was then filtered and washed with acetone two times. Solid particles were filtered and 7-layer pigments treated with phosphoric acid were obtained. The 7-layer pigments had a structure as illustrated in
(147) The phosphoric acid treated 7-layer pigments were then suspended in 160 ml of ethanol in a round bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser. The suspension was heated to 65 C. after 35 g of water and 3.5 g of a 28% aqueous ammonia solution had been added. Next, a solution of 10 g of tetraethoxysilane diluted with 13 ml of ethanol was added to the heated suspension in small amounts while stirring. This reaction mixture was stirred for 14 hours at 65 C., then solid particles were filtered from the liquid, washed with ethanol and then washed with isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Seven layer SiO.sub.2-coated pigments were obtained after the solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours.
(148) Protocol 1A7-Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer
(149) A quantity of 10 g of 7-layer pigments were suspended in 160 ml of ethanol in a round bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser without first being treated with phosphoric acid as in Protocol 1. The suspension was heated to 65 C. after 35 g of water and 3.5 g of a 28% aqueous ammonia solution had been added. Next, a solution of 10 g of tetraethoxysilane diluted with 13 ml of ethanol was added to the heated suspension in small amounts while stirring. This reaction mixture was stirred for 14 hours at 65 C., then solid particles were filtered from the liquid, washed with ethanol and then washed with isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Seven layer SiO.sub.2-coated pigments were obtained after the solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours.
(150) Protocol 27-Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer Using Aqueous Solution
(151) Fifteen grams of 7-layer pigments were placed in a 250 ml 3-neck flask. Then, 100 ml of DI water was added and the solution stirred inside an ethylene glycol bath that was heated to 80 C. The solution was set to a pH of 7.5 by adding a few drops of 1M NaOH solution. Next, 20 ml of Na.sub.2SiO.sub.3 (13 wt % SiO.sub.2) was added to the solution at a constant flow rate of 0.1 ml/min using a syringe pump. While adding the Na.sub.2SiO.sub.3, an aqueous 1M HCl solution was also added to maintain the pH of 7.5 using an automated pH control system. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, filtered off, washed with IPA and dried at 100 C. for 24 hours. The coated material can be further annealed at 200 C. for 24 h.
(152) Protocol 37 Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer and a Hybrid SiO.sub.2Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Layer
(153) Two grams of pigments coated with SiO.sub.2 per Protocol 1 or 1A were suspended in 20 ml of a water solution and having a pH of about 10 (adjust by diluted NaOH solution). The suspension was heated to 60 C. while being constantly stirred in a 100 ml round bottom flask. Then, 0.5 ml of 18 wt % Na.sub.2Si0.sub.3 solution and 1 ml of 0.5M Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 solution were both simultaneously titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate in 1 hour. The slurry pH was not controlled. After the titration, the suspension was aged for 30 minutes under stirring. The mixture was filtered and remaining solid particles were washed with DI water and then washed with IPA. Seven layer pigments having a SiO.sub.2 layer and an Al.sub.2O.sub.3 layer were obtained after the remaining solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours.
(154) Protocol 47 Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer and a ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Hybrid Layer
(155) Three grams of SiO.sub.2-coated pigments per Protocol 1 or 1A were suspended in 20 ml of ethanol in a 100 ml round bottom flask and stirred at room temperature. Also, 0.66 g of aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide and 2.47 ml of zirconium butoxide were dissolved in 15 ml of IPA. The aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide+zirconium butoxide mixture was titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate in 2 hours. At the same time, 0.66 ml of DI water diluted in 2 ml of ethanol was metered in. After the titration, the suspension was stirred for another 30 minutes. The mixture was filtered and remaining solid particles were washed with ethanol and then washed with IPA. Seven layer pigments having a SiO.sub.2 layer and a hybrid ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 layer were obtained after the remaining solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours, or in the alternative after being further annealed at 200 C. for 24 hours.
(156) Protocol 57 Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer and a ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Hybrid Layer
(157) Three grams of SiO2-coated pigments per Protocol 1 or 1A were suspended in 20 ml of DI water with a pH of 8 (adjusted by diluted NaOH solution) in a 100 ml round bottom flask and heated to 50 C. while constantly stirring. Then, 0.5 ml of 5 wt % NaAlO.sub.2 solution and 0.5 ml of 10 wt % ZrOCl.sub.2 solution were both simultaneously titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate in 30 minutes. The slurry pH was controlled at 8 by adding diluted HCl or NaOH solution. After the titration, the suspension was aged for 30 min under stirring. The mixture was filter off, washed with DI water and then washed with IPA. The coated pigments were obtained after being dried at 100 C. for 24 hours, or in the alternative after being further annealed at 200 C. for 24 hours.
(158) Protocol 67 Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer, a CeO.sub.2 Layer and a ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Hybrid
(159) Silicon oxide (SiO.sub.2) coated pigments (3.5 g) per Protocol 1 or 1A were suspended in 26.83 ml of water in a 100 ml round bottom flask and stirred at 70 C. for 20 minutes. Then, 0.33 g of Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O in 1.18 ml of H.sub.2O was titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate of 2 mL/hr and the mixture was kept stirring for an additional 1.5 hours after titration. During the reaction, the pH of the solution was kept constant at 7.0 using a diluted NaOH solution. The mixture was filtered and the remaining solid particles were washed with water three times and then washed with IPA an additional three times. Seven layer pigments having a layer of SiO.sub.2 and a layer of CeO.sub.2 were obtained after the remaining solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours.
(160) Next, 3 g of the coated pigments were suspended in 20 ml of ethanol in a 100 ml round bottom flask and stirred at room temperature. A mixture of 0.66 g of aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide and 2.47 ml of zirconium butoxide dissolved in 15 ml of IPA was titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate in 2 hours. At the same time, 0.66 ml of DI water diluted in 2 ml of ethanol was metered in. After the titration, the suspension was stirred for another 30 minutes. The mixture was filtered and the remaining solid particles were washed with ethanol and then washed with IPA. Seven layer pigments having a layer of SiO.sub.2, a layer of CeO.sub.2 and a hybrid ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 layer were obtained after the remaining solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours.
(161) Protocol 77 Layer Pigments Coated with a CeO.sub.2 Layer and a ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Hybrid Layer
(162) Three grams of 7-layer design pigments were suspended in 20 ml of IPA in a 100 ml round bottom flask and stirred at 75 C. A solution of 0.44 g of Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O dissolved in 20 ml of IPA was titrated in at constant rate in 1 hour. At the same time, 0.15 ml of ethylenediamine (EDA) diluted in 0.9 ml of DI water was metered in. A further 0.15 ml of EDA diluted in 0.9 ml of DI water was subsequently metered in. After the titration, the suspension was stirred for another 15 minutes. The mixture was filtered and the remaining solid particles were washed with IPA. Seven layer pigments having a layer of CeO.sub.2 were obtained after the remaining solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 5 hours.
(163) The CeO.sub.2-coated pigments were then suspended in 20 ml of ethanol in a 100 ml round bottom flask and stirred at room temperature. Next, a mixture of 0.66 g of aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide and 2.47 ml of zirconium butoxide dissolved in 15 ml of IPA was titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate in 2 hours. At the same time, 0.66 ml of DI water diluted in 2 nil of ethanol was metered in. After the titration, the suspension was stirred for another 30 minutes. The mixture was filtered and the remaining solid particles were washed with ethanol and then washed with IPA. Seven layer pigments having a layer of CeO.sub.2 and a hybrid layer of ZrO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3 were obtained after the remaining solid particles were dried at 100 C. for 24 hours, or in the alternative further annealed at 200 C. for 24 hours.
(164) Protocol 87-Layer Pigments Coated with a ZrO.sub.2 Layer
(165) Two grams of 7-layer design pigments were suspended in 30 ml of ethanol in a 100 ml round bottom flask and stirred at room temperature. A solution of 2.75 ml of zirconium butoxide (80% in 1-Butanol) dissolved in 10 ml of ethanol was titrated in at constant rate in 1 hour. At the same time, 1 ml of DI water diluted in 3 ml of ethanol was metered in. After the titration, the suspension was stirred for another 15 minutes. Seven layer pigments having a layer of ZrO.sub.2 were obtained after the remaining solid particles were filter from the solution, washed with ethanol and dried at 100 C. for 5 hours, or in the alternative further annealed at 200 C. for 24 hours.
(166) Protocol 97-Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer and an Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Layer
(167) Two grams of SiO.sub.2-coated pigments per Protocol 1 or 1A were suspended in 20 ml of water solution having a pH of about 8 (adjusted by diluted NaOH solution) in a 100 ml round bottom flask and heated to 50 C. while constantly stiffing. Then, 0.5 ml of 5 wt % NaAlO.sub.2 solution was titrated into the pigment suspension at constant rate in 30 minutes. The slurry pH was controlled at 8 using a HCl 1M solution. After the titration, the suspension was aged for 30 minutes while stiffing. The mixture was filtered off, washed with DI water and then washed with IPA. The coated pigments are obtained after being dried at 100 C. for 24 hours.
(168) Protocol 107-Layer Pigments Coated with a SiO.sub.2 Layer and an TiO.sub.2 Layer
(169) A 250 ml 3-neck round bottom flask was placed in an ethylene glycol oil bath with a temperature set as 80 C. Then, 15 g of SiO.sub.2-coated flakes per Protocol 1 or 1A, and 100 ml of DI water, were put into the flask and stirred at 400 rpm. The solution was set to a pH of 2 by adding a few drops of concentrated HCl solution. A pre-diluted 35% TiCl.sub.4 solution was then titrated into the mixture at a constant flow rate of 0.1 ml/min via a syringe pump. To maintain the pH constant, base solution NaOH solution (8M) was titrated into the flask through an automated pH control system. During the deposition, flake samples were extracted at specific time intervals to determine the layer thickness. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, then filtered, washed with IPA and dried at 100 C. for 24 hours, or in the alternative further annealed at 200 C. for 24 hours.
(170) The weather resistant properties of the coated pigments were tested in the following manner Seven cylindrical pyrex flask (capacity ca. 120 mL) were used as photoreactor vessels. Each flask contained 40 ml of a fluorescent red dye (eosin B) solution (110.sup.5M) and 13.3 mg of a pigment to be tested. The pigment-eosin B solution was magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min, and then exposed to light from a solar simulator (Oriel Sol2A Class ABA Solar Simulators). For each pigment, the same type pigment wrapped with aluminum foil was used as a direct control. Also, commercial TiO.sub.2 (Degussa P25) was used as a reference with which to compare photocatalytic activity under the same experimental conditions. UV/Vis absorption spectra were recorded after 65 hours of light exposure to monitor the photocatalytic activity of each sample.
(171) The results of the testing were plotted as relative photocatalytic activity versus pigment type as shown in
(172) Scanning electron microscopy images of the 7-layer pigments before and after being coated with a SiO.sub.2 layer and a ZrO.sub.2Al.sub.2O.sub.3 layer (protocol 4) are shown in
(173) A summary of coatings, the process used to produce a coating, coating thickness, coating thickness uniformity and photocatalytic activity is shown in Table 3 below.
(174) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Coating Thickness Photocatalytic Sample Core* Layer Material Protocol (nm) Uniformity Activity** 1 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 51% 2 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 3 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 4 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 30 G 5 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 40 G 6 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 50 G 7 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 15 G 8 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 10 G 9 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 30 G 50% 10 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 30 G 2.sup.nd Al2O3 9 <10 G 11 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 30 G 2.sup.nd ZrO2Al2O3 5 15 NG 12 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 30 G 2.sup.nd ZrO2Al2O3 6 15 G 13 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 2.sup.nd CeO2 7 NG 14 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 66% 2.sup.nd SiO2Al2O3 3 10 G 15 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 2.sup.nd SiO2Al2O3 3 10 G 16 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 2.sup.nd SiO2Al2O3 3 10 G 17 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 2.sup.nd Al2O3 9 10 G 18 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 33% 2.sup.nd ZrO2Al2O3 6 15 G 19 P7 1.sup.st SiO2 1, 1A 80 G 33% 2.sup.nd CeO2 6 3 G 3.sup.rd ZrO2Al2O3 6 15 G 20 P7 1.sup.st CeO2 7 3 G 21% 2.sup.nd ZrO2Al2O3 6 15 G 21 P7 1.sup.st CeO2 7 3 G 2.sup.nd ZrO2Al2O3 6 15 G 22 P7 1.sup.st CeO2 7 3 G 2.sup.nd ZrO2Al2O3 6 15 G 27 P7 1.sup.st ZrO2 11 ~20 G *P7 = 7-layer pigment **compared to non-coated 7-layer pigment
(175) Given the above, Table 4 provides a listing of various oxide layers, substrates that can be coated and ranges of coating thickness included within the instant teachings.
(176) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Range of Coating Oxide Layer Substrate Thickness (nm) SiO.sub.2 Mica, P7, metal, oxides 10-160 TiO.sub.2 Mica, P7, metal, oxides 20-100 ZrO.sub.2 Mica, P7, metal, oxides 20-100 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Mica, P7, metal, oxides 5-30 CeO.sub.2 Mica, P7, Oxides ~5-40 SiO.sub.2Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Mica, P7, oxides 20-100 ZrO.sub.2Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Mica, P7, metal, oxides 10-50
(177) In addition to the above, the omnidirectional structural color pigments with a protective coating can be subjected to an organo-silane surface treatment. For example, one illustrative organo-silane protocol treatment suspended 0.5 g of pigments coated with one or more of the protection layers discussed above in a 10 ml of EtOH/water (4:1) solution having pH about 5.0 (adjusted by diluted acetic acid solution) in a 100 ml round bottom flask. The slurry was sonicated for 20 seconds then stirred for 15 minutes at 500 rpm. Next, 0.1-0.5 vol % of an organo-silane agent was added to the slurry and the solution was stirred at 500 rpm for another 2 hours. The slurry was then centrifuged or filter using DI water and the remaining pigments were re-dispersed in 10 ml of a EtOH/water (4:1) solution. The pigment-EtOH/water slurry was heated to 65 C. with reflux occurring and stirred at 500 rpm for 30 minutes. The slurry was then centrifuged or filtered using DI water and then IPA to produce a cake of pigment particles. Finally, the cake was dried at 100 C. for 12 hours.
(178) The organo-silane protocol can use any organo-silane coupling agent known to those skilled in the art, illustratively including N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy-silane (MAPTMS), N-[2(vinylbenzylamino)-ethyl]-3-aminoproplyltrimethoxysilane, 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane and the like.
(179) The above examples and embodiments are for illustrative purposes only and changes, modifications, and the like will be apparent to those skilled in the art and yet still fall within the scope of the invention. As such, the scope of the invention is defined by the claims and all equivalents thereof.