Hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane in which nanoparticles are used, method for manufacturing said membrane, and fuel cell

Abstract

A hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane used for the proton exchange membrane of a fuel cell, containing a cross-linked composite mediated by the sulfonate groups of SPPSU and SPOSS. Where SPPSU is represented by formula (I), where a, b, c, and d are each independently an integer of 0-4, and the total of a, b, c, and d is a rational number greater than 1 in terms of the average per repeating unit, and SPOSS is represented by formula (II), where each R is independently a hydrogen, a hydroxyl group, a straight or branched C1-20 alkyl or alkoxyl group optionally containing a substituent, or any of the above-mentioned structures, each e is independently an integer of 0-2 for R, x is an integer of 1-20, and the total number of sulfonate groups is a rational number greater than 2 in terms of the average per molecule. ##STR00001##

Claims

1. A hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane used in a proton exchange membrane of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell, the hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane comprising: a cross-linked composite of a sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) and a sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) via sulfonic acid groups.

2. The hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 1, wherein the cross-linked composite is a cross-linked composite of: the SPPSU having a structure represented by the formula (I): ##STR00006## (wherein a, b, c, and d are each independently an integer of 0 to 4, the total of a, b, c, and d is a rational number greater than 1 on average per repeating unit), and the SPOSS having a structure represented by the formula (II): ##STR00007## (wherein R is each independently hydrogen, a hydroxyl group, a straight or branched alkyl group or alkoxyl group with a carbon number of 1 to 20 which may have a substituent, or any of the above-described structures; e is (if present) an integer of 0 to 2 for each independent R; x is (if present) an integer of 1 to 20, and the total number of sulfonic acid groups is a rational number greater than 2 on average per molecule).

3. The hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 2, wherein the total of a, b, c, and d is 2 or more on average per repeating unit, and/or the total of e is 8 or 16 on average per molecule.

4. The hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 1, wherein the mass proportion of the SPOSS to the SPPSU in the cross-linked composite is 10% by mass or less.

5. A proton exchange membrane fuel cell comprising the hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 1 as a proton exchange membrane.

6. A method for producing a hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane used in a proton exchange membrane of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell, comprising a step of forming a cross-linked composite by subjecting a sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) and a sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) to a cross-linking reaction via sulfonic acid groups under heating.

7. The method for producing a hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 6, wherein the step of forming a cross-linked composite comprises: subjecting the SPPSU represented by the formula (I): ##STR00008## (wherein a, b, c, and d are each independently an integer of 0 to 4, the total of a, b, c, and d is a rational number greater than 1 on average per repeating unit), and the SPOSS represented by the formula (II): ##STR00009## (wherein R is each independently hydrogen, a hydroxyl group, a straight or branched alkyl group or alkoxyl group with a carbon number of 1 to 20 which may have a substituent, or any of the above-described structures, e is (if present) an integer of 0 to 2 for each independent R, x is (if present) an integer of 1 to 20, and the total number of sulfonic acid groups is a rational number greater than 2 on average per molecule) to a cross-linking reaction via sulfonic acid groups.

8. The method for producing a hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 7, wherein the total of a, b, c, and d is 2 or more on average per repeating unit, and/or the total of e is 8 or 16 on average per molecule.

9. The method for producing a hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 6, wherein the mass proportion of the SPOSS to the SPPSU in the cross-linked composite is 10% by mass or less.

10. The method for producing a hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane according to claim 6, wherein the step of forming a cross-linked composite is followed by a step of heat-treating the thus obtained cross-linked composite in sulfuric acid.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the chemical structure of an SPPSU having a degree of sulfonation of 2 obtained in Synthesis Example of SPPSU (n in the figure means the number of repeating units in the SPPSU actually obtained).

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the chemical structure of an SPOSS obtained in Synthesis Example of SPOSS.

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the chemical structure of an SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane obtained in Example 1 (the same applies to Examples 2 and 3). In the figure, (a) represents an SPOSS (sulfonated phenyl groups are bonded to each Si atom), (b) represents an SPPSU (degree of sulfonation: 2), and (c) represents the schematic structure of the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane finally obtained.

(4) FIG. 4 depicts the properties of the chemical structure of an SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1 and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes obtained in Examples 1 to 3 (SPOSS 2% by mass, SPOSS 5% by mass, and SPOSS 10% by mass) as measured by FT-IR.

(5) FIG. 5 depicts the thermal characteristics of the SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1 and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes obtained in Examples 1 and 2 (SPOSS 2% by mass and SPOSS 5% by mass) as measured by TGDTA in an oxygen atmosphere.

(6) FIG. 6 depicts the conductive properties of the SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1 (thickness: 0.162 mm) and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes obtained in Examples 1 to 3 (SPOSS 2% by mass (thickness: 0.117 mm), SPOSS 5% by mass (thickness: 0.06 mm), and SPOSS 10% by mass (thickness: 0.067 mm) as evaluated in terms of temperature and RH %. In the figure, (a) represents the SPPSU cross-linked membrane of Comparative Example 1, (b) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 2% by mass of SPOSS of Example 1, (c) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 5% by mass of SPOSS of Example 2, and (d) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked membrane containing 10% by mass of SPOSS of Example 3.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(7) The hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane used in a proton exchange membrane of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell according to the present invention is characterized by including a cross-linked composite of a sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) and a sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) via sulfonic acid groups.

(8) In this cross-linked composite, plural molecular chains of the SPPSU are firmly cross-linked with the SPOSS having sulfonic acid groups, whereby a proton exchange membrane having good balance between high concentration of sulfonic acid groups and stability to water, more specifically, having great balance between proton conductivity and mechanical strength can be obtained.

(9) The sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) is not particularly limited as to the position and degree of sulfonation and degree of polymerization, but typically has the structure represented by the above-described formula (I).

(10) In the formula, a, b, c, and d are each independently an integer of 0 to 4, the total of a, b, c, and d is a rational number greater than 1 on average per repeating unit.

(11) From a viewpoint of good balance between high concentration of sulfonic acid groups (proton conductivity) and stability to water (mechanical strength), a and/or b and/or c and/or d is preferably 1, the total of a, b, c, and d is 1.5 or more on average per repeating unit. More preferably, the total of a, b, c, and d is about 2 or more on average per repeating unit. The total of a, b, c, and d is typically about 2 or about 4. Most typically, the total of a, b, c, and d is about 2.

(12) In the formula, n (the number of repeating units) is not particularly limited, and may be a value which can make the weight average molecular weight MW of the SPPSU (weight average molecular weight in terms of polystyrene as measured by gel-permeation chromatography; hereinafter the same) fall within the range of 5,000 to 500,000, preferably within the range of 10,000 to 300,000. In alternative embodiment, the n in the formula is not particularly limited, and may be a value which can make the weight average molecular weight MW of the SPPSU fall within the range of 5,000 to 200,000, 10,000 to 100,000, or 5,000 to 100,000, or 10,000 to 200,000.

(13) The method for synthesizing the sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) is not particularly limited, for example, may be any known method such as the method disclosed in Examples of JP-A-2015-170583 (National Institute for Materials Science).

(14) The sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) is not particularly limited as to the location and degree of sulfonation, but typically has a structure represented by the above-described formula (II).

(15) In the formula, R is each independently hydrogen, a hydroxyl group, a straight or branched alkyl group or alkoxyl group with a carbon number of 1 to 20 which may have a substituent, or any of the above-described structures. The e is (if present) an integer of 0 to 2 for each independent R, and x is (if present) an integer of 1 to 20.

(16) The degree of sulfonation of the SPOSS is preferably higher from a viewpoint of giving a high concentration of sulfonic acid groups (proton conductivity) to the SPPSU. When the stability to water (mechanical strength) is taken into consideration, the total number of sulfonic acid groups can be a rational number greater than 2 on average per molecule, more preferably greater than 3 on average, even more preferably greater than 4 on average, while the maximum is 16. In a typical embodiment, the total number of sulfonic acid groups is about 8 or 16 on average per molecule. Most typically, the total number of sulfonic acid groups is about 8 on average per molecule.

(17) From the similar viewpoint, typically, e is (if present) 1 or 2 for each independent R, and the total of e is about 8 or 16 on average per molecule. Most typically, the total of e is about 8 on average per molecule. When e is 1, the site of substitution of sulfonic acid group is usually para position, and when e is 2, the site of substitution of sulfonic acid group is usually two meta positions.

(18) The method for synthesizing the sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) is not particularly limited, for example, may use any known method such as that disclosed in Hartmann-Thompson, C., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 958-974.

(19) In the cross-linked composite, the mass proportion of the sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) to the sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) is not particularly limited, but is usually 1% by mass or more and 15% by mass or less. The mass proportion is, from a viewpoint of maintaining good balance between high concentration of sulfonic acid groups and stability to water (more specifically, balance between proton conductivity and mechanical strength), preferably 1.5% by mass or more and 12% by mass or less, more preferably 2% by mass or more and 10% by mass or less, or 2% by mass or more and 8% by mass or less, or 2% by mass or more and 5% by mass or less.

(20) The step of forming a cross-linked composite by cross-linking of the sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) and the sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) via sulfonic acid groups is preferably carried out under heating. The reaction under heating sufficiently cross-links plural molecular chains of the SPPSU with the SPOSS, thereby increasing the high concentration of sulfonic acid groups (proton conductivity) while improving the stability to water (mechanical strength).

(21) The method for producing a cross-linked composite of the sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) and the sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS) via sulfonic acid groups is not particularly limited, but usually may be carried out as follows.

(22) The SPPSU is dissolved in an appropriate organic solvent. The organic solvent is not particularly limited, and may be, for example, an organic solvent with a high boiling point such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethyl acetamide (DMAc), dimethyl formamide (DMF), or N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). In an alternative embodiment, the organic solvent may be replaced or combined with any type of alcohol, e.g., at least one selected from the group consisting of isopropanol and 1-propanol, and/or water. The SPOSS is charged into a solution of the SPPSU at a mass proportion within the above-described range (usually 1% by mass or more and 15% by mass or less), and stirred at appropriate temperature of, for example, about 40 C. to 80 C., thereby preparing a dispersion. Subsequently, the solvent is evaporated from the dispersion at a moderately elevated temperature, thereby obtaining a cast membrane (unstretched membrane).

(23) Subsequently, the SPPSU-SPOSS composite membrane as a cast membrane is heat-treated at a further elevated temperature, thereby obtaining a cross-linked composite. The heating temperature and time are not particularly limited, and, for example, selected form appropriate conditions from the ranges of about 90 C. to 210 C., and 1 hour to 3 days. It is also preferred that the membrane be heated at gradually elevated multiple temperatures. For example, the membrane may be continuously heated in the first stage at 100 to 140 C., the second stage at 140 C. to 180 C., and the third stage of 160 C. to 200 C. for 6 hours to 36 hours, respectively.

(24) Optionally, following the heating step, it is also preferred that the cross-linked composite thus obtained be further heat-treated in sulfuric acid. At this time, the composite may be treated in, for example, 0.5 M to 5 M sulfuric acid at a temperature of about 50 C. to 100 C., for about 1 hour to 2 days. After the heat treatment, the composite is washed with water, thereby finally obtaining a SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked membrane.

(25) The proton exchange membrane fuel cell of the present invention includes an anode, a cathode, and a proton exchange membrane between the two electrodes composing the anode and cathode in contact with them, the proton exchange membrane including the above-described hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane.

(26) This proton exchange membrane fuel cell is not particularly limited except that the proton exchange membrane includes the above-described hydrocarbon-based cross-linked membrane, and the anode and cathode may have any known structure.

(27) All the values and the range of the values described in the present description and claims may include error ranges which are acceptable in the art, and it is intended that all of them may be modified with about.

EXAMPLES

(28) The present invention is further described in detail with reference to examples, but these examples are only illustrative, and will not limit the present invention.

(29) Firstly, the methods for measuring various properties referred in Examples and Comparative Examples are described.

(30) Ion Exchange Capacity (IEC)

(31) A titration was carried out using a NaOH solution at a predetermined concentration, and the ion exchange capacity (IEC) was determined from the amount of NaOH solution when neutralized until the pH became 7 ([A] ml) and the concentration of the NaOH solution ([B] g/ml) using the following calculation formula.
Ion exchange capacity (IEC) (meq/g)=[A][B]/sample weight (g)
Water Uptake (WU)

(32) The water uptake of a sample was determined from the weights before and after hydration. Before the measurement, the membrane was cut into a piece of 10 mm10 mm, and dried in a drying oven at a temperature of 100 C. for 24 hours. The weight of the dried membrane War.sub.y was measured. Subsequently, the membrane was immersed in deionized water at 100 C. for 2 hours, and then surface water adhered to the membrane was removed. Thereafter, the weight of the wet membrane W.sub.wet was measured. Using these values, the water uptake (WU) (sometimes referred to as water absorption rate) was calculated using the following formula.
WU (%)=[(W.sub.wetW.sub.dry)/W.sub.dry]100
Swelling Ratio

(33) The dry membrane and the wet membrane were obtained by the same manner as in the measurement of water uptake (WU). The swelling ratio was calculated by the following formula using the thickness of the dry membrane S.sub.dry and the thickness of the wet membrane S.sub.wet.
Swelling ratio (%)=[(S.sub.wetS.sub.dry)/S.sub.dry]100%

(34) [ (Number of Water Molecules Per Sulfonic Acid): n(H.sub.2O)/n(SO.sub.3H)]

(35) The dry membrane and the wet membrane were obtained by the same manner as in the measurement of water uptake (WU). (number of water molecules per sulfonic acid) was calculated by the following formula using the weight of the dry membrane W.sub.dry and the weight of the wet membrane W.sub.wet.
=[(W.sub.wetW.sub.dry)1000]/[18(molecular weight of H.sub.2O)IECW.sub.dry]=(water uptake (%)10)/[molecular weight of H.sub.2IEC]
Synthesis Example of SPPSU

(36) The powder of a PPSU (Radel R-5000, Solvay) was dissolved in sulfuric acid at a ratio of 1 g: 20 ml, and sulfonated for two days at 50 C. under stirring in the presence of nitrogen gas. This solution was cooled with ice, poured into significantly excessive water under stirring, thereby obtaining a white precipitate. After standing overnight, the precipitate was filtered, and washed using a dialysis tubing cellulose membrane until the pH became 7. This object was dried to obtain a sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU). As described later, the ion exchange capacity (IEC) of the SPPSU thus obtained was equivalent to the calculated value (3.6 meq/g), indicating that about two sulfonic acid groups had been introduced per repeating unit. The schematic view of the chemical structure of the SPPSU is depicted in FIG. 1.

(37) Synthesis Example of SPOSS

(38) An octaphenyl-POSS and chlorosulfonic acid were mixed at a ratio of 1 g:10 ml, and then subjected to a sulfonation reaction at 50 C. for 3 days. Subsequently, unreacted chlorosulfonic acid was removed by vacuum distillation, and washed with water. Subsequently, the object was filtered, and water was removed by vacuum distillation, thereby obtaining a sulfonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (SPOSS). Identification of the SPOSS was carried out using FT-IR as described in Non-Patent Literature 7. As a result of this, it was found that, as schematically depicted in FIG. 2, the SPOSS has a structure wherein a sulfonated phenyl group (more specifically, a substituent wherein one sulfonic acid group is bonded to each unit of phenyl group) is bonded to each Si atom.

Example 1

(39) Synthesis of SPPSU-SPOSS Composite Membrane

(40) The SPPSU polymer thus obtained was dissolved in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) at a ratio of 1 g:19 g. The SPOSS was charged into the SPPSU solution at a ratio of 2% by mass relative to the SPPSU, and dispersed under stirring at 60 C. for 1 hour. The SPPSU-SPOSS dispersion was placed in a petri dish, the solvent was evaporated at 80 C. over one day, thus obtaining an SPPSU-SPOSS composite membrane as a cast membrane (i.e. a non-oriented membrane).

(41) Making of SPPSU-SPOSS Cross-Linked Membrane

(42) The SPPSU-SPOSS composite membrane obtained as described above was heated at 120 C. for one day, at 160 C. for one day and then at 180 C. for one day, thereby obtaining an SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked membrane. The SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked membrane was treated in 1 M sulfuric acid at 80 C. for 15 hours, and then water-washed, thereby completing a SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane. The chemical structure of the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane finally obtained is schematically given in FIG. 3. In the figure, (a) represents the schematic structure of the SPOSS (in which sulfonated phenyl groups are bonded to each Si atom), (b) represents the SPPSU (with a degree of sulfonation of 2), and (c) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane finally obtained.

Example 2

(43) A SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the proportion of the SPOSS to the SPPSU was changed to 5% by mass.

Example 3

(44) A SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the proportion of the SPOSS to the SPPSU was changed to 10% by mass.

Comparative Example 1

(45) The SPPSU polymer obtained as described above was dissolved in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) at a ratio of 1 g:19 g. The SPPSU solution was placed in a petri dish, the solvent was evaporated at 80 C. over one day, thereby obtaining a SPPSU cast membrane (i.e. a non-oriented film). The SPPSU cast membrane was heated at 120 C. for one day, 160 C. for one day and then at 180 C. for one day, thereby obtaining a SPPSU cross-linked membrane (free from SPOSS).

(46) Characteristic Evaluation, Discussion

(47) Physicochemical properties of the SPPSU polymer obtained in the above-described Synthesis Example, the SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1, and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked membranes obtained in Examples 1 to 3 (SPOSS 2% by mass, SPOSS 5% by mass, and SPOSS 10% by mass) at room temperature are given in Table 1.

(48) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Room temperature properties of SPPSU polymer of Synthesis Example, SPPSU cross-linked membrane of Comparative Example 1, SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes of Examples 1 to 3 Water Swelling Organic IEC(meq/g) uptake ratio [n(H.sub.2O)/n(SO.sub.3H)] *.sup.1 solvent SPPSU synthetic polymer 3.6 dissolved dissolved dissolved SPPSU cross-linked membrane 2.516 316% 12% 70 insoluble SPPSU-2% SPOSS cross-linked 2.297 103% 52% 25 insoluble composite membrane SPPSU-5% SPOSS cross-linked 1.547 21% 6% 7.6 insoluble composite membrane SPPSU-10% SPOSS cross-linked 1.7 10% 3% 3.3 insoluble composite membrane *.sup.1 Number of water molecules per sulfonic acid group

(49) The ion exchange capacity (IEC) of the SPPSU polymer obtained in Synthesis Example was very high, and equivalent to the calculated value (3.6 meq/g). This means that about two sulfonic acid groups are introduced per repeating unit. Accordingly, this SPPSU polymer is readily soluble in water and organic solvents. However, as in Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Example 1, the polymer is cross-linked by making a cast membrane and subjecting to a heating process at a temperature of up to 180 C., and becomes insoluble in water and organic solvents.

(50) The SPPSU cross-linked membrane free from SPOSS of Comparative Example 1 is insoluble in water and organic solvents, but when the membrane is present in water, it swelled with a large amount of water, and the swellability is high particularly in the length direction.

(51) On the other hand, for the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked membrane (SPOSS 2% by mass) obtained in Example 1, the cross-linking with the SPOSS decreased the swellability in water of the cross-linked membrane of the SPPSU alone (Comparative Example 1) of 316% to 103%, and suppressed swellability in the length direction. Additionally, with respect to the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane (SPOSS 5% by mass) of Example 2 and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane (SPOSS 10% by mass) of Example 3, the swellability was made smaller by further increasing the amount of the SPOSS.

(52) As far as the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane (SPOSS 2% by mass) of Example 1 is concerned, the swellability in the thickness direction was higher than others. For the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes of Examples 1 to 3, the number of water molecules per sulfonic acid group noticeably decreased in comparison with the SPPSU cross-linked membrane free from SPOSS of Comparative Example 1.

(53) The SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1, and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes obtained in Examples 1 to 3 (SPOSS 2% by mass, SPOSS 5% by mass, and SPOSS 10% by mass) were measured by FT-IR, and the properties of their chemical structures are depicted in FIG. 4. In the figure, (a) represents the SPPSU cross-linked membrane of Comparative Example 1, (b) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 2% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 1, (c) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 5% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 2, and (d) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 10% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 3, respectively.

(54) In FIG. 4, for the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes of (b) to (d), the peaks derived from sulfonic acid are hard to be discriminated because the SPPSU and the SPOSS are overlapped with each other, but the SiO peak derived from the SPOSS is observed at 790 cm-1, so that the introduction of the SPOSS was confirmed. On the other hand, the cross-linking between the sulfonic acid group of the SPOSS and the sulfonic acid group of the SPPSU by the heat treatment overlaps with the SO peak derived from the SPPSU bond, so their discrimination is difficult. However, the water uptake of the cross-linked membrane markedly decreased (see Table 1), which indirectly indicates the achievement of cross-linking.

(55) The thermal properties of the SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1 and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes (SPOSS 2% by mass, SPOSS 5% by mass) obtained in Examples 1 to 2 were measured by TGDTA in an oxygen atmosphere, and the results are given in FIG. 5. In the figure, (a) represents the SPPSU cross-linked membrane of Comparative Example 1, (b) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 2% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 1, and (c) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 5% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 2, respectively.

(56) FIG. 5 indicates that the cross-linking of the SPPSU with the SPOSS in Examples 1 and 2 makes the thermal stability of the cross-linked composite membrane higher than that of the SPPSU cross-linked membrane (SPPSU alone) in Comparative Example 1, and that the thermal stability increased with higher loading of the SPOSS. The reason for this is due to the increase of the cross-linking with the SPPSU accompanied with higher loading of the SPOSS.

(57) The SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1 (thickness: 0.162 mm), and the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membranes obtained in Examples 1 to 3 (SPOSS 2% by mass (thickness: 0.117 mm), SPOSS 5% by mass (thickness: 0.06 mm), and SPOSS 10% by mass (thickness: 0.067 mm)) were evaluated for the conductivity properties in terms of temperature and RH %, and the results are given in FIG. 6. In the figure, (a) represents the SPPSU cross-linked membrane of Comparative Example 1, (b) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 2% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 1, (c) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 5% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 2, and (d) represents the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane containing 10% by mass of the SPOSS of Example 3, respectively.

(58) The SPPSU cross-linked membrane obtained in Comparative Example 1 had high conductivity of about 0.2 S/cm at 80 C., 90% RH. However, as given in Table 1, the cross-linked membrane had a very high water uptake, and poor stability in water.

(59) On the other hand, the SPPSU-SPOSS cross-linked composite membrane (SPOSS 2% by mass) of Example 1 had a lowered water uptake that was one third or less than the SPPSU cross-linked membrane (free from SPOSS) of Comparative Example 1, but nevertheless, it achieved an equivalent high conductivity at 80 C., 90% RH. The reason for this is likely that the SPPSU and the SPOSS were cross-linked in Example 1, whereby the SPOSS decreased the water uptake and increased stability of the cross-linked membrane without interference of proton conductivity. In Examples 2 and 3 wherein the SPOSS amount was increased (5% and 10%), the water uptake further decreased due to the enhancement of cross-linking, and the possibility of interference of proton conduction path increased, whereby the decrease of conductivity was observed.