Rope, rope arrangement and hoisting device
10865070 ยท 2020-12-15
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
D07B5/006
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B1/22
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B1/162
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B1/005
TEXTILES; PAPER
International classification
B66B7/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
D07B1/22
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B5/00
TEXTILES; PAPER
Abstract
A belt-shaped rope of a hoisting device, the rope being substantially larger in its width-direction than thickness-direction, and comprising two or more load bearing members; a coating forming an outer surface of the rope, in which coating the two or more load bearing members are embedded, wherein the two or more load bearing members are oriented to extend parallel with longitudinal direction of the rope adjacent each other in width direction of the rope such that a gap is formed in width direction between load bearing members next to each other, the coating extending into the gap. The coating comprises a first coating portion between load bearing members next to each other, and a second coating portion forming an outer side of the rope facing in thickness direction of the rope, and in that the material of the first coating portion is substantially harder than the material of the second coating portion.
Claims
1. A rope arrangement, comprising: a belt-shaped rope substantially larger in a width direction than a thickness direction thereof, the belt-shaped rope including, two or more load bearing members, and a coating embedding the two or more load bearing members therein, the two or more load bearing members oriented to extend parallel with a longitudinal direction of the belt-shaped rope such that a gap is formed in the width direction between adjacent ones of two or more load bearing members, the coating extending into the gap, the coating including, a first coating portion between the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members, the first coating portion including a first material, and a second coating portion forming an outer side of the belt-shaped rope facing the thickness direction, the second coating portion including a second material that is substantially softer than the first material; and a crowned rope wheel including a crowned circumferential surface such that end diameters thereof are smaller than a central diameter thereof, the crowned rope wheel having the belt-shaped rope passing therearound such that the second coating portion forming the outer side of the belt-shaped rope rests against the crowned circumferential surface of the crowned rope wheel, wherein the first coating portion is made of a material having a first Shore A hardness, and the second coating portion is made of material having a second Shore A hardness, wherein the first Shore A hardness is more than Shore A 85.
2. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the first coating portion between the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members is bonded with both of the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members to couple the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members.
3. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the first coating portion between the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members is a solid one-piece structure extending between the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members throughout their lengths.
4. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the belt-shaped rope is configured to be guided by the crowned circumferential surface of the crowned rope wheel.
5. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein each of the two or more load bearing members is substantially larger in the width direction of the belt-shaped rope than in thickness direction of the belt-shaped rope.
6. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein each of the two or more load bearing members is shaped to have at least one planar side face.
7. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the two or more load bearing members is made of a composite material including reinforcing fibers embedded in a polymer matrix, the reinforcing fibers being carbon fibers or glass fibers.
8. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the first coating portion is completely encapsulated within the belt-shaped rope.
9. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the first coating portion forms a first outer side of the belt-shaped rope, and the second coating portion forms a second outer side of the belt-shaped rope, the second outer side facing the first outer side in thickness direction of the belt-shaped rope.
10. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the first coating portion and said second coating portion both include a polymer material.
11. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the first coating portion and the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members are surrounded by the second coating portion.
12. The rope arrangement according to claim 1, wherein a second outer side of the belt-shaped rope opposite to the outer side formed by the second coating portion, is contoured to have an uneven surface pattern.
13. A hoisting device comprising: the rope arrangement of claim 1, wherein the belt-shaped rope is connected with a load to be hoisted.
14. A rope arrangement, comprising: a belt-shaped rope substantially larger in a width direction than a thickness direction thereof, the belt-shaped rope including, two or more load bearing members, and a coating embedding the two or more load bearing members therein, the two or more load bearing members oriented to extend parallel with a longitudinal direction of the belt-shaped rope such that a gap is formed in the width direction between adjacent ones of two or more load bearing members, the coating extending into the gap, the coating including, a first coating portion between the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members, the first coating portion including a first material, and a second coating portion forming an outer side of the belt-shaped rope facing the thickness direction, the second coating portion including a second material that is substantially softer than the first material; and a crowned rope wheel including a crowned circumferential surface such that end diameters thereof are smaller than a central diameter thereof, the crowned rope wheel having the belt-shaped rope passing therearound such that the second coating portion forming the outer side of the belt-shaped rope rests against the crowned circumferential surface of the crowned rope wheel, wherein the first coating portion and the adjacent ones of the two or more load bearing members are surrounded by the second coating portion.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the following, the present invention will be described in more detail by way of example and with reference to the attached drawings, in which
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10) The foregoing aspects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the drawings and the detailed description related thereto.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(11)
(12) The number of the load bearing members 2 is in the illustrated examples four, however the number could be some other albeit at least two. Having plurality of load bearing members 2 instead of a larger one may be seen advantageous for various reasons. For instance, in this way sensitivity to cracking can be reduced.
(13) The load bearing members 2 are oriented to extend parallel with longitudinal direction of the rope 1, 1, 1 throughout the length thereof adjacent each other in width direction w of the rope 1, 1, 1 such that a gap is formed in width direction between each two load bearing members 2 next to each other, the coating 3, 3, 3 extending into the gap and filling it. The load bearing members 2 are placed such that their central axes are on a same plane extending in width direction of the rope 1, 1, 1. The coating 3, 3, 3 comprises a first coating portion 3a; 3a, 3a that is in width direction of the rope 1,1, 1 between load bearing members 2 that are next to each other, and a second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b forming an outer side S1 of the rope 1, 1, 1 facing in thickness direction of the rope. The material of the first coating portion 3a;3a;3a is substantially harder than the material of the second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b. In this way, structure of the coating becomes optimized for the sub tasks which its different portions have as will be described in further details hereinafter.
(14) The hard first coating portion 3a,3a,3a being placed between load bearing members increases rope flexural rigidity EI and therefore decreases rope displacement from the crowning centreline as predicted by equation 1 and shown by tests. The centerline is at the point of the peak of the convex shape of the crowned circumferential surface area. The second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b of lower hardness being placed on the rope surface provides the rope 1, 1, 1 with sufficient friction.
(15) In guidance of a belt shaped coated rope by a crowned shaped of a rope wheel, the rope settles to its equilibrium position which may be approximated by equation
(16)
where
(17) z is the displacement of rope from crowning centreline
(18) R.sub.cr is crowning radius
(19) is fleet angle
(20) R is pulley radius
(21) F is rope force
(22) EI is the flexural rigidity of rope.
(23) The flexural rigidity EI appearing in the equation 1 is determined by rope cross section dimensions and material properties. In particular, EI is affected by load Young's modulus E of the bearing members and mutual coupling between them. The difference between zero coupling and rigid coupling is significant. In practice, the coupling is never neither zero nor rigid, but somewhere in between them. The rigidity of the coupling is affected especially by the material properties of the coating between the load bearing members. This is due to the fact that load transfer in structures occurs primarily through the most rigid path. The parts of the coating on the rope surface doesn't affect very much on the coupling between load bearing members. Based on the above description, sufficient friction and improved guidance for the belt-shaped rope to be guided by a crowned rope wheel is achieved by combining two or more coating portions of different hardnesses. The first and second coating portions 3a,3a,3a;3b,3b,3b can be for instance grades of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) with different hardnesses.
(24) Generally, the friction of a coated belt-shaped rope is affected by contact surfaces of rope and rope wheel. The stiffer and harder the coating, the lower is the coefficient of friction if other things (e.g. surface quality) remain constant. If the coating is too hard, elevator-level T1/T2 requirements on the drive wheel are not met. This may be disadvantageous in terms of reliability of the grip and safety. The friction decreases significantly over time since chemical changes occur in and dirt is embedded in the rope surface.
(25) In the preferred embodiments of
(26) In the preferred embodiments of
(27) Said outer side S1 of the rope 1,1, 1 facing in thickness direction t of the rope 1,1, 1 and formed by the second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b is suitable for being placed against a crowned circumference 6 of a rope wheel 4,4. Said side is substantially smooth and shaped to be without teeth or longitudinal ribs protruding in thickness direction t of the rope 1,1,1.
(28) Preferably, each said load bearing member 2 is non-circular, preferably substantially larger in width-direction w of the rope 1,1,1 than in thickness-direction t of the rope 1,1,1. The coating portions of different hardnesses are particularly preferable with ropes having load bearing members of this shape, as the load bearing members are likely to be difficult to position symmetrically, because symmetry of the cross-section is sensitive to tilt or twist of the load bearing members 2. Slight tilt or twist of a wide load bearing member 2 may result in differences between individual ropes and ropes of different batches. Generally, challenges of guidance of ropes with inaccuracies such as slight tilt of the load bearing members 2 can be facilitated with the presented solution as it reduces sensitivity of the guidance to such inaccuracies.
(29) Generally, a wide structure of the load bearing member 2 facilitates its bending. This is particularly relevant with rigid material such as the composite as described elsewhere in this application. The width/thickness ratio of each said load bearing member 2 is preferably two or more.
(30) The width/thickness ratio of the rope is preferably two or more, preferably more than 4. Thus, a single rope with good load bearing ability and bendability can be achieved even with load bearing members 2 made of rigid material such as the composite as described elsewhere in this application.
(31) Each said load bearing member 2 can be shaped to have a planar side face or plurality of them, as illustrated. The cross section of the load bearing member 2 is preferably, but not necessarily, furthermore such that each said load bearing member 2 can be shaped to have at least one planar side face that extends parallel with the width direction of the rope 1,1, 1. In the preferred embodiments, the load bearing member 2 comprises also a planar side face that extends parallel with the thickness direction of the rope 2. As for its overall shape, the load bearing members 2 of the preferred embodiments are rectangular in cross section with their corners rounded.
(32) The load bearing members 2 are made of material different than the first and second coating portion 3a;3a;3a,3b;3b;3b of the coating 3,3,3. It is preferred that each said load bearing member 2 is made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers f embedded in polymer matrix m, said reinforcing fibers f preferably being carbon fibers or glass fibers. Due to the demanding nature of a composite material of this kind, load bearing members 2 of this kind of material are advantageous to provide with a coating, but also to shape non-circular which makes them sensitive to inaccuracies in their positioning.
(33) In the preferred embodiments, the second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b covers the first coating portion 3a;3a;3a in thickness direction t of the rope 1,1, 1.
(34) Hereinafter, preferred further details of the material properties are described. The hardness is in the following discussed referring to Shore A hardness scale. Accordingly, it is preferred that the first coating portion 3a;3a;3a is made of a material having a first Shore A hardness, and said second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b is made of material having a second Shore A hardness. Preferably then, the first Shore A hardness is more than Shore A 85, and less than Shore A 100. Then, the second Shore A hardness is less than said first Shore A hardness, but preferably the second Shore A hardness is at most Shore A 85, because this way the frictional properties thereof are suitable for friction based engagement of most drive wheels of hoisting devices such as elevators in particular.
(35) Hereinafter, preferred further details of the materials are described. Preferably, the first coating portion 3a;3a;3a and said second coating portion 3b; 3b;3b are both made of polymer material, and advantageously having material properties particularly as described in the preceding paragraph. Most preferably, the first coating portion 3a;3a;3a is made of polyurethane having a first Shore A hardness, and said second coating portion 3b; 3b; 3b is made of polyurethane having a second Shore A hardness. Material properties of polymer materials can be simply adjusted to a desired hardness e.g. by additives mixed with a base polymer, as it is commonly known in the field.
(36) In the embodiment of
(37) In the embodiment of
(38) In the embodiment of
(39)
(40)
(41) Generally,
(42) Combination of coating portions 3a,3a,3a;3b,3b,3b of different hardnesses, e.g by combining different polymer material grades, can be achieved with precision by co-extrusion. This manufacturing technology utilizes two or more extruders to melt and deliver a steady volumetric throughput of different polymer material grades to a single extrusion die which will extrude the materials in the desired form.
(43) Generally, the presented solutions have several significant advantages, most of which are based on the increased fleet angle tolerance of the rope. When fleet angle is present, either intentionally or unintentionally, the rope arrives to a rope wheel 4,4 from a direction or departs from a rope wheel 4,4 in direction, which direction is not completely orthogonal to the axis of the rope wheel. With the solutions presented for example one or more of the following advantages can be facilitated in elevators: Less stringent installation tolerances (especially rope wheels, bedplate and compensator). Crowning width can be decreased due to reduced lateral displacement of rope. This enables narrower rope wheels and fitting more ropes in the same space. Alternatively, crowning radius can be increased, which decreases load bearing member stresses and enables smaller diameter rope wheels. Increased tolerance against building sway Ability to mix several rope batches in a single elevator. One rope replacement becomes easier. No need for the special two rope wheel bedplate (in most cases) due to reduced contact length requirement. Reduced inertias and cost, increased rope lifetime. No need for the large diverter rope wheels (in most cases) due to reduced contact length requirement. Reduced inertias and cost. It might be possible to apply belt in 2:1 systems that have fleet angle Easy visual detection of coating wear.
(44) As mentioned, it is preferred that each said load bearing member 2 is made of composite material comprising reinforcing fibers f embedded in polymer matrix m, said reinforcing fibers f preferably being carbon fibers or glass fibers.
(45) The fibers f are preferably substantially untwisted in relation to each other, which provides them said orientation parallel with the load bearing member 2, and finally so with the longitudinal direction of the rope 1,1,1 as well. The reinforcing fibers f are preferably long continuous fibers in the longitudinal direction of the elongated load bearing member 2, preferably continuing unbroken throughout the whole length of the elongated load bearing member 2. As mentioned, the reinforcing fibers f are preferably distributed in the matrix m substantially evenly. The fibers f are then arranged so that the load bearing member 2 would be as homogeneous as possible in the transverse direction thereof. Owing to the even distribution, the fiber density in the cross-section of the elongated load bearing member 2 is substantially constant. The composite matrix m, into which the individual fibers f are distributed, is most preferably made of epoxy, which has good adhesiveness to the reinforcement fibers f and which is known to behave advantageously with reinforcing fibers such as carbon fiber particularly. Alternatively, e.g. polyester or vinyl ester can be used, but other suitable alternative materials could alternatively be used. The matrix m has been applied on the fibers f such that a chemical bond exists between each individual reinforcing fiber f and the matrix m. Thereby a uniform structure is achieved. To improve the chemical adhesion of the reinforcing fiber to the matrix m, in particular to strengthen the chemical bond between the reinforcing fiber f and the matrix m, each fiber can have a thin coating, e.g. a primer (not presented) on the actual fiber structure between the reinforcing fiber structure and the polymer matrix m. However, this kind of thin coating is not necessary. The properties of the polymer matrix m can also be optimized as it is common in polymer technology. For example, the matrix m can comprise a base polymer material (e.g. epoxy) as well as additives, which fine-tune the properties of the base polymer such that the properties of the matrix are optimized. The polymer matrix m is preferably of a hard non-elastomer, such as said epoxy, as in this case a risk of buckling can be reduced for instance. However, the polymer matrix need not be non-elastomer necessarily, e.g. if the downsides of this kind of material are deemed acceptable or irrelevant for the intended use. In that case, the polymer matrix m can be made of elastomer material such as polyurethane or rubber for instance.
(46) As above mentioned, the matrix m of the elongated load bearing member 2 is most preferably hard in its material properties. A hard matrix m helps to support the reinforcing fibers f, especially when the rope bends, preventing buckling of the reinforcing fibers f of the bent rope, because the hard material supports the fibers f efficiently. To reduce the buckling and to facilitate a small bending radius of the elongated load bearing member 2, among other things, it is therefore preferred that the polymer matrix m is hard, and in particular non-elastomeric. The most preferred materials for the matrix are epoxy resin, polyester, phenolic plastic or vinyl ester. The polymer matrix m is preferably such that its modulus of elasticity E is over 2 GPa, most preferably over 2.5 GPa. In this case the modulus of elasticity E is preferably in the range 2.5-10 GPa, most preferably in the range 2.5-4.5 GPa. There are commercially available various material alternatives for the matrix m which can provide these material properties. Preferably over 50% proportion of the area of the cross-section of the elongated load bearing member 2 is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, preferably such that 50%-80% proportion is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, more preferably such that 55%-70% proportion is of the aforementioned reinforcing fiber, and substantially all the remaining area is of polymer matrix m. Most preferably, this is carried out such that approx. 60% of the area is of reinforcing fiber and approx. 40% is of matrix material (preferably epoxy material). In this way a good longitudinal stiffness for the elongated load bearing member 2 is achieved. As mentioned carbon fiber is the most preferred fiber to be used as said reinforcing fiber due to its excellent properties in hoisting appliances, particularly in elevators. However, this is not necessary as alternative fibers could be used, such as glass fiber, which has been found to be suitable for the hoisting ropes as well. The elongated load bearing member 2 is preferably completely non-metallic, i.e. made not to comprise metal.
(47) In the preferred embodiments of
(48) In the preferred embodiments, an advantageous shape of the load bearing member 2 and an advantageous shape and internal layout of the rope 1,1,1 have been disclosed. However, the invention can also be utilized with ropes which comprise differently shaped load bearing members or a different number of them.
(49) Generally, the rope 1,1,1 presented can be a hoisting rope for suspending a load to be hoisted, as presented in
(50) It is to be understood that the above description and the accompanying Figures are only intended to teach the best way known to the inventors to make and use the invention. It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The above-described embodiments of the invention may thus be modified or varied, without departing from the invention, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention and its embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims.