Cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and methods of use thereof

Abstract

Novel cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions containing them for treating neurological diseases in a subject include an Odorranalectin (OL) sequence or modified OL sequence as a scaffold and a biologically active peptide or protein and/or therapeutic agent conjugated thereto. Methods of treatment of neurological diseases are based on intranasal delivery of a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein. Combinatorial libraries that include a plurality of cyclic peptides have also been developed and can be used to screen for a ligand(s) for a receptor of interest.

Claims

1. A conjugate comprising a cyclic peptide of SEQ ID NO: 6 conjugated to (X).sub.m at the N-terminal end, wherein (X).sub.m, is an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof present in the central nervous system or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and wherein the residues Xaa at positions 8-12 of SEQ ID NO: 6 consist of an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof present in the central nervous system or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and wherein the conjugate has antinociceptive and analgesic activity.

2. The conjugate of claim 1, wherein the opioid receptor ligand is a δ opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist, a DOR agonist, a μ opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist, a MOR agonist, a κ opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist, or a KOR agonist.

3. The conjugate of claim 1, wherein the conjugate modulates opioid receptor activity.

4. A cyclic peptide comprising the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of TABLE-US-00011 (SEQ ID NO: 8) DADLE-OL = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9a.sup.10G.sup.11F.sup.12I.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; (SEQ ID NO: 9) DADLE-OL II = Y.sup.1a.sup.2G.sup.3F.sup.4I.sup.5K.sup.6-cyclo[C.sup.7F.sup.8R.sup.9Y.sup.10P.sup.11N.sup.12 G.sup.13V.sup.14L.sup.15A.sup.16C.sup.17]T.sup.18; (SEQ ID NO: 10) TIPP-OL = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9Tic.sup.10F.sup.11F.sup.12V.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; (SEQ ID NO: 7) TIPP-EM1-OL. = Y.sup.1P.sup.2W.sup.3F.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9Tic.sup.10F.sup.11 F.sup.12V.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; (SEQ ID NO: 11) OLKOR-L1 = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8G.sup.9F.sup.10W.sup.11P.sup.12K.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; and (SEQ ID NO: 12) OLMOR-L1 = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8H.sup.9F.sup.10P.sup.11V.sup.12N.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17, wherein a=D-Ala and 1=D-Leu.

5. The conjugate of claim 1, wherein a therapeutic agent is conjugated to (X).sub.m.

6. The conjugate of claim 5, wherein the therapeutic agent is a small molecule.

7. The conjugate of claim 5, wherein the therapeutic agent is selected from the group consisting of an analgesic, an anti-convulsant, an antidote, an anti-microbial, an anti-cancer, an anti-inflammatory, and an anti-neurodegenerative.

8. The conjugate of claim 6, wherein the small molecule is selected from the group consisting of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5HTrp), naloxone, serotonin, dopamine, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), epinephrine, norepinephrine, histamine, adenosine triphosphate, adenosine, cannabidiol (CBD), CBD derivative, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), THC derivative, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin— norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), memantine, and pramipexole.

9. A cyclic peptide conjugate comprising the amino acid sequence: 5-HTrp.sup.1-A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8G.sup.9F.sup.10W.sup.11P.sup.12K.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17 (SEQ ID NO: 13).

10. The conjugate of claim 5, wherein the therapeutic agent is a protein.

11. The conjugate of claim 10, wherein the protein is a growth hormone.

12. The conjugate of claim 5, wherein the therapeutic agent is an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof.

13. The conjugate of claim 12, wherein the opioid receptor ligand is a DOR antagonist, a DOR agonist, a MOR antagonist a MOR agonist, a KOR antagonist, or a KOR agonist.

14. A conjugate comprising a cyclic peptide of SEQ ID NO: 16 having conjugated to its N-terminus a therapeutic agent, wherein the therapeutic agent is conjugated to the N-terminus via a cleavable bond or linker.

15. The conjugate of claim 14, wherein the therapeutic agent is a small molecule selected from the group consisting of 5HTrp, naloxone, serotonin, dopamine, L-DOPA, epinephrine, norepinephrine, histamine, adenosine triphosphate, adenosine, cannabidiol (CBD), CBD derivative, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), THC derivative, nabilone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluvoxamine, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), desvenlafaxine, milnacipran, levomilnacipran, memantine, and pramipexole.

16. A cyclic peptide conjugate comprising the sequence SEQ ID NO: 17.

17. A composition for intranasal administration comprising a therapeutically effective amount of the conjugate of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

18. A method of treating pain in an individual comprising administering to the individual in need thereof a composition comprising a cyclic peptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 11 or SEQ ID NO: 13 via intranasal delivery to the individual's brain.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the pain is neuropathic pain.

20. A conjugate comprising a cyclic peptide of SEQ ID NO: 6 conjugated to a small molecule, wherein the residues Xaa at positions 8-12 of SEQ ID NO: 6 consist of an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof present in the central nervous system or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and wherein the conjugate has antinociceptive and analgesic activity, and wherein the small molecule is selected from the group consisting of nabilone, fluvoxamine, desvenlafaxine, milnacipran, and levomilnacipran.

21. A conjugate comprising a cyclic peptide of SEQ ID NO: 16 having directly conjugated to its N-terminus a therapeutic agent.

22. The conjugate of claim 21, wherein the therapeutic agent is a small molecule selected from the group consisting of 5HTrp, naloxone, serotonin, dopamine, L-DOPA, epinephrine, norepinephrine, histamine, adenosine triphosphate, adenosine, cannabidiol (CBD), CBD derivative, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), THC derivative, nabilone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluvoxamine, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), desvenlafaxine, milnacipran, levomilnacipran, memantine, and pramipexole.

23. The conjugate of claim 21, wherein the therapeutic agent is a peptide.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is an illustration of a typical embodiment of cyclic peptide-based drug delivery to the brain.

(2) FIG. 2 shows grafting of DADLE sequence into the OL scaffold yielding a novel cyclic opioid peptide. The top sequence is SEQ ID NO:1 and the bottom sequence is SEQ ID NO: 8.

(3) FIG. 3A is a graph showing accumulation of OL in the mouse brain and nose after i.n. administration (30 μg, 6 μL/nostril). FIG. 3B is a graph showing accumulation of DADLE-OL and OL in the mouse brain after intraperitoneal (i.p.) (2 mg/mL, 250 μL/25 g mouse) and i.n. (30 μg, 6 μL/nostril) administration. Peptide level in the brain was determined by LC-MS/MS. All experiments were done in triplicate. Blank: tissue with added IS after samples were collected.

(4) FIG. 4 is a graph showing antinociceptive effects of synthesized peptides after i.n. and i.p. administration. Points=8 mice. *=p<0.05 vs. pre-admin latency; †=p<0.05 vs. 600 μg DADLE-OL latency at same time.

(5) FIG. 5 is an amino acid structure and a graph showing that TIPP-OL fully reverses the effect of a potent DOR agonist SNC-80 in mice after i.n. administration. TIPP=Tyr-Tic-Phe-PheOH (SEQ ID NO: 2).

(6) FIG. 6 is an amino acid structure and a graph showing the antinociceptive effects of bifunctional TIPP-EM1-OL. TIPP=Tyr-Tic-Phe-PheOH (SEQ ID NO: 2). Endomorphin 1=Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH.sub.2 (SEQ ID NO: 3). Tic=1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid.

(7) FIG. 7 shows sequences of the prepared positional scanning combinatorial library (PSCL). In these sequences, X represents a position composed of a mixture of 19 D- or L-amino acids; O represents a position defined with an individual amino acid; and A represents individual amino acids. According to IUPAC rules, lower case letters designate D-amino acids (e.g. D-alanine=a), whereas upper case letters designate proteinogenic L-amino acids (e.g. L-alanine=A). X (upper case) represents mixture of 19 L-amino acids. In these sequences, “x” (lower case) represents a mixture of 19 D-amino acids; “0” (upper case) represents a single L-amino acid; “o” (lower case) represents a single D-amino acid; and “a” (lower case) represents a D-amino acid.

(8) FIG. 8 is an amino acid structure and a graph showing the antinociceptive effects of a synthesized DADLE-OL II analogue.

(9) FIG. 9A is OLMOR-L1 amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 12), a potent novel MOR agonist, OLMOR-L1, identified from screening of an OL-based combinatorial library. FIG. 9B is a graph showing rapid activity and dose response of OLMOR-L1 following i.n. administration. FIG. 9C is a graph showing improved potency of OLMOR-L1 in comparison to the parent DADLE-OL. FIG. 9D is a graph showing antinociception in wild-type, MOR-KO, KOR-KO, and DOR-KO mice using tail-withdrawal test indicating lack of in vivo opioid receptor selectivity of OLMOR-L1.

(10) FIG. 10 is a graph showing the effects of OL-based opioid ligands on mice motor coordination and balance.

(11) FIG. 11 shows amino acid sequences of novel dual-acting OL-based ligands as described herein. The top sequence is SEQ ID NO: 11, and the bottom sequence is SEQ ID NO: 13.

(12) FIG. 12 is a graph showing antinociceptive activity of OLKOR-L1 in the mouse 55° C. warm water tail withdrawal assay following i.n. administration.

(13) FIGS. 13A, 13B, and 13C are graphs showing in vivo activities of OL-based OLKOR-L1, OLKOR-L1-5HTrp, and OL-5HTrp. FIG. 13A is a dose response of OLKOR-L1-5OHTrp. Antinociceptive effects were observed 2 minutes after i.n. administration. FIG. 13B shows a significant increase in antinociceptive activity observed for OLKOR-L1-5HTrp. FIG. 13C shows more potent and longer lasting antiallodynic effects observed for OLKOR-L1-5HTrp in the mouse chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain compared to morphine.

(14) FIG. 14 is a series of plots showing results demonstrating that following intranasal administration of OLKOR-L1-5HTrp, 5-hydroxytryptophan accumulates predominantly in the mouse midbrain 30 minutes after intranasal administration.

(15) FIG. 15A shows amino acid structures and proteolytic hydrolysis of DADLE-OL.

(16) FIG. 15B is a graph showing the effects of DADLE-OL fragments on cAMP production. DPDPE=[D-Pen.sup.2,5]-Enkephalin hydrate, a selective agonist for DOR, used as a control. DADLE=[D-Ala.sup.2, D-Leu.sup.5] enkephalin mixed MOR and DOR agonist, used as a control.

(17) FIG. 16 is a schematic showing preparation of Naloxone-OL. The first amino acid sequence at the top of the figure is SEQ ID NO: 21, the second amino acid sequence (below the first amino acid sequence) is SEQ ID NO: 20, and the third amino acid sequence (below the second amino acid sequence) is SEQ ID NO: 17.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(18) Novel cyclic peptides and cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions containing them, as well as methods of using them, are described herein. A novel therapy has been developed for the treatment of neurological diseases, disorders, and disabling conditions based on the intranasal delivery of a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein. Combinatorial libraries that include a plurality of cyclic peptides have also been developed and can be used to screen for a ligand(s) for a receptor of interest. The experimental results described in more detail in the Examples below demonstrate the therapeutic utility of the cyclic peptides and cyclic peptide conjugates that are delivered intransally (i.n.) for treating neurologic diseases, disorders and conditions such as addiction, for example. A known δ opioid receptor ligand (DOR), D-Ala-D-Leu enkephalin (DADLE), was grafted (inserted) into an OL scaffold and it was demonstrated that the novel DADLE-OL cyclic peptide retains the properties of both parent peptides (the DADLE and the OL), including opioid receptor ligand functional activity. To demonstrate suitability of an OL scaffold for additional structural modifications, OL analogues differing in the position and sequences of the grafted opioid peptide ligands were synthesized and their in vivo activity was assessed. It was shown that the additional OL analogues can be delivered via the intranasal route to the mouse brain and produce biological effects in the brain in a concentration-dependent manner. To identify novel opioid ligands based on the OL scaffold, a focused positional-scanning synthetic combinatorial library (PSCL) of 2,476,099 cyclic peptides was prepared and screened for affinity for μ, δ and κ opioid receptors, from which novel OL-based ligands were identified. These data demonstrate the feasibility of the molecular grafting approach for the design of novel OL analogs for direct nose-to-brain delivery of therapeutic peptides, proteins, small molecules and other therapeutic agents without undesirable side effects. They also demonstrate the utility of cyclic peptide combinatorial libraries for screening for and identifying therapeutic agents (e.g., receptor ligands). The described strategy has broad implications for the development of novel drugs and delivery carriers for brain targeting and the treatment of neurological diseases, disorders and disabling conditions.

Cyclic Peptides, Cyclic Peptide Conjugates, and Compositions for Treating Neurological Diseases, Disorders and Disabling Conditions

(19) The cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions described herein are capable of traveling to an individual's brain via intranasal delivery and exerting a biological effect in the CNS. The cyclic peptides include a biologically active peptide or protein and/or other therapeutic agent (e.g., a small molecule) and an OL sequence or modified OL sequence. OL can be modified at its N-terminus (amino acids Tyr-Ala-Ser-Pro (SEQ ID NO: 4) which are amino acids 1-4 of SEQ ID NO:1) and at its β-turn region (amino acids Tyr-Pro-Asn-Gly-Val (SEQ ID NO: 5) which are amino acids 9-13 of SEQ ID NO:1), but not at its bioadhesive domain (amino acids 5-7, 16 and 17 of SEQ ID NO:1). Examples of chemical modifications at its N-terminus include: insertion of peptide sequences composed of L-, D- and nonproteinogenic amino acids; insertion of peptidomimetics; conjugation of small molecules; conjugation of proteins; and conjugation of nanoparticles. Examples of chemical modifications at OL's β-turn region include: insertion of peptide sequences composed of L-, D- and nonproteinogenic (synthetic) amino acids; and insertion of peptidomimetics.

(20) In one embodiment, a cyclic peptide has the general Formula 1:
(X).sub.m-Lys-cyclo[Cys-Phe-X.sub.1-X.sub.2-X.sub.3-Cys]-Thr  (SEQ ID NO: 6).
In this formula, X is an amino acid sequence having a length of m amino acids (m is at least 3); X.sub.1 is a basic amino acid; X.sub.2 is an amino acid sequence having a length of 5 amino acids; X.sub.3 is an amino acid sequence having a length of 2 amino acids; and at least one of (X).sub.m and X.sub.2 includes a biologically active peptide or protein (e.g., an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof). A cyclic peptide may be a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, X can be any protein or peptide sequence having a length (i.e., m) of at least 3 (e.g., 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) amino acids, but can be up to several thousand amino acids in length. For example, X can be Tyr-Ala-Ser-Pro (SEQ ID NO: 4) which are amino acids 1-4 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO:1). The amino acids of X can be L-amino acids (e.g., all L-amino acids), D-amino acids (e.g., all D-amino acids), nonproteinogenic (synthetic) amino acids, peptidomimetics, or a mix thereof. These amino acids can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, or a mix thereof. Generally, the order and types of amino acids is determined based upon the interaction of the cyclic peptide with its biological target(s). In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, X.sub.1 can be any basic amino acid (e.g., Lys, Arg). This amino acid can be a naturally occurring amino acid or a non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acid. X.sub.1 corresponds to position (amino acid) 8 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1). In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, X.sub.2 can be any 5 amino acids, and corresponds to amino acids 9-13 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1). These amino acids can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, or a mix thereof. In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, the amino acids of X.sub.3 correspond to amino acids 14 and 15 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1), and can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, L-amino acids, D-amino acids, or a mix thereof.

(21) The biologically active peptide or protein can be any peptide or protein that exhibits a an effect (e.g., beneficial effect, adverse effect) on living matter (e.g., a cell, cells, organelle, tissue, etc.). Examples of biologically active peptides or proteins include receptors, proteins, and enzymes present in the CNS. In a typical embodiment, the biologically active peptide or protein is a receptor, protein or enzyme present in the CNS. In some embodiments, the biologically active peptide or protein is an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof. In such embodiments, one or both of (X).sub.m and X.sub.2 can be an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof. One embodiment of a cyclic peptide in which both (X).sub.m and X.sub.2 are or include opioid receptor ligands is the cyclic peptide TIPP-EM1-OL Y.sup.1P.sup.2W.sup.3F.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9Tic.sup.10F.sup.11F.sup.12V.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17 (SEQ ID NO: 7), a dual-acting cyclic peptide containing a MOR agonist (MOR active sequence) inserted into positions 1-4 of OL (SEQ ID NO:1) and a DOR antagonist (DOR active sequence) inserted into positions 9-12 of OL (SEQ ID NO:1). In TIPP-EM1-OL: X.sub.m is EM1; X.sub.1 is Arg; X.sub.2 is Tipp-Val; and X.sub.3 is Leu-Ala. Generally in these embodiments, the cyclic peptide modulates activity of the opioid receptor(s). Examples of opioid receptor ligands include a δ opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist, a DOR agonist, a opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist, a MOR agonist, a κ opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist, and a KOR agonist. In the Examples below, OL-based MOR, DOR and KOR agonists and DOR antagonists were generated by modifying OL residues 1-4, 9-12, and 9-13 of SEQ ID NO:1. Opioid receptor ligands and assays involving same are described, for example, in U.S. application Ser. No. 15/145,901, incorporated herein by reference.

(22) Examples of cyclic peptides having the general Formula I include:

(23) TABLE-US-00007 (SEQ ID NO: 8) DADLE-OL = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9a.sup.10G.sup.11F.sup.12I.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; (SEQ ID NO: 9) DADLE-OL II = Y.sup.1a.sup.2G.sup.3F.sup.4I.sup.5K.sup.6-cyclo[C.sup.7F.sup.8R.sup.9Y.sup.10P.sup.11N.sup.12 G.sup.13V.sup.14L.sup.15A.sup.16C.sup.17]T.sup.18; (SEQ ID NO: 10) TIPP-OL = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9Tic.sup.10F.sup.11F.sup.12V.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15CIT.sup.16]T.sup.17; (SEQ ID NO: 7) TIPP-EM1-OL. = Y.sup.1P.sup.2W.sup.3F.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9Tic.sup.10F.sup.11 F.sup.12V.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; (SEQ ID NO: 11) OLKOR-L1 = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8G.sup.9F.sup.10W.sup.11P.sup.12K.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17; and (SEQ ID NO: 12) OLMOR-L1 = Y.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8H.sup.9F.sup.10P.sup.11V.sup.12N.sup.13 L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17,
wherein a=D-Ala and 1=D-Leu.

(24) In some embodiments, a cyclic peptide of general Formula 1 further includes a therapeutic agent conjugated to (X).sub.m. Examples of therapeutic agents include analgesics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, antidotes, antimicrobials (e.g., anti-viral agents, antibiotics), anti-cancer agents, anti-inflammatory agents, anti-neurodegenerative agents, etc. In some embodiments, the therapeutic agent is a small molecule. Any small molecule can be conjugated to a cyclic peptide of the general Formula I. Specific examples of small molecules include 5HTrp, naloxone, serotonin, dopamine, L-DOPA, epinephrine, norepinephrine, histamine, adenosine triphosphate, adenosine, cannabidiol (CBD), CBD derivative, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), THC derivative, nabilone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluvoxamine, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), desvenlafaxine, milnacipran, levomilnacipran, memantine, and pramipexole. One example of a cyclic peptide of general Formula I having a therapeutic agent conjugated thereto is:

(25) TABLE-US-00008 (SEQ ID NO: 13) OLKOR-L1-5HTrp = 5-HTrp.sup.1-A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8G.sup.9 F.sup.10W.sup.11P.sup.12K.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17.
In this example, the therapeutic agent is the small molecule 5HTrp (a serotonin biosynthetic precursor) that was conjugated to the Ala at position 1 of SEQ ID NO: 1 by a standard solid-phase peptide synthesis protocol. In this cyclic peptide, X.sub.m is 5HTrp-Ala-Ser-Pro (SEQ ID NO: 14); X.sub.1 is Arg; X.sub.2 is a KOR agonist (Gly-Phe-Trp-Pro-Lys SEQ ID NO: 15); and X.sub.3 is Leu-Ala. In other embodiments, the therapeutic agent is a peptide or a protein, e.g., a growth hormone or an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof, or a nanoparticle.

(26) The cyclic peptide conjugates described herein are composed of a cyclic peptide having conjugated to its N-terminus a therapeutic agent. The therapeutic agent can be conjugated to the N-terminus of the cyclic peptide by any suitable means, e.g., conjugated directly to the N-terminus via a cleavable bond or linker, via “click” reactions, etc. Examples of click reactions include: Cu(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), thiol-ene reaction, thiol-Michael addition, oxime ligation, Diels-Alder reaction, and Staudinger ligation and native chemical ligation.

(27) In a typical cyclic peptide conjugate, the cyclic peptide includes the amino acid sequence:

(28) (X).sub.m-A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9P.sup.10N.sup.11G.sup.12V.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17 (SEQ ID NO: 16), wherein X is a linker, or an amino acid sequence at the N-terminus having a length of m amino acids; m is 0 or at least 1; and the amino acids are L-amino acids, D-amino acids, nonproteinogenic amino acids, proteinogenic amino acids, peptidomimetics, or a mix thereof. A cyclic peptide conjugate may be a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. A specific example of such a cyclic peptide conjugate is:
naloxone-C.sup.1A.sup.2S.sup.3P.sup.4K.sup.5-cyclo[C.sup.6F.sup.7R.sup.8Y.sup.9P.sup.10N.sup.11G.sup.12V.sup.13L.sup.14A.sup.15C.sup.16]T.sup.17 (SEQ ID NO: 17). In this embodiment, X is Cys and the therapeutic agent is a small molecule—naloxone—directly attached to the N-terminus of the cyclic peptide via a cleavable/bond linker. However, the therapeutic agent can be conjugated to the cyclic peptide by any suitable method, chemistry or means. In embodiments in which X is a linker, the linker can be any suitable linker, e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), sebacic acid, suberic acid, dithio-bis-maleimidoethane (DTME), dimethyl pimelimidate, etc. The therapeutic agent can be any agent suitable for treating a neurological disease, disorder and disabling condition (e.g., peptides, proteins, small molecules, nanoparticles). In an embodiment in which the therapeutic agent is a small molecule, as with the cyclic peptides described above, the small molecule can be any small molecule. Similarly, in an embodiment in which the therapeutic agent is a peptide or protein, any therapeutic peptide or protein can be used.

(29) Small molecules, proteins, nanoparticles and other therapeutic agents can be conjugated to a cyclic peptide by any suitable protocol. Typically, the small molecule or other therapeutic agent is conjugated to the N-terminus of the cyclic peptide. Small molecules and other therapeutic agents can also be conjugated, for example, using known chemistries (see Wen T. and M. L. Becker, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43:p. 7013). As another example, small molecules can be conjugated via amide bond (peptide chemistry). As another example, small molecules (and other therapeutic agents) can be conjugated by “click” reactions. Different types of “click” reactions have been developed to synthesize peptide conjugates, including Cu(I) catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), strain promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), thiol-ene reaction, Michael addition, oxyme ligation, Diels-Alder reaction, Staudinger ligation and native chemical ligation, (Wen Tang, Matthew L. Becker, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 7013-7039). In some embodiments, the N-terminal part of OL possessing a preselected functional group(s) suitable for the above mentioned “click” reaction is selected as a place for conjugation. The main limitation of the “click” reactions for the small molecule conjugation to peptide is that the desired functional groups must be compatible with the reaction conditions for peptide coupling, deprotection and cleavage. Alternatively, if the small molecule (or other therapeutic agent) possesses the amino or carboxyl functional groups, standard peptide coupling reactions can be used.

(30) To demonstrate the feasibility of small molecule coupling to OL and to show that these conjugates exhibit biological activities, OLKOR-L1-5HTrp and OL-naloxone analogues were produced. 5HTrp, a serotonin biosynthetic precursors, was coupled to the N-terminal Ala of OL using standard solid-phase peptide synthetic protocol. 5HTrp was released from the OLKOR-L1-5HTrp scaffold as evidenced by the increased 5HTrp concentration in the mouse midbrain following intranasal administration of OLKOR-L1-5HTrp, FIG. 14. Naloxone is coupled to the OL scaffold using thiol-ene reaction. Naloxone is a μ-opioid receptor antagonist and reversal agent used to mitigate risk for opioid-induced respiratory depression by displacing the full opioid agonists. For this purpose, the N-terminal Tyr.sup.1 in the OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) was replaced with Cys.sup.1, whereas acryl naloxone derivate required for thiol-ene reaction was prepared as described previously (Diego et al. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 1767-1774). As Shown in FIG. 16, naloxone-OL was prepared by adding acryl naloxone to the peptidyl-resin precursor possessing N-terminal Cys with free thiol group. The final product OL-naloxone was purified by RP-HPLC as in the case of OL and related analogs its Mw was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS analysis.

(31) Compositions for treating a neurological disease, disorder and disabling condition in an individual include a therapeutically effective amount of a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In some embodiments, the composition further includes a second therapeutic agent. In an embodiment of a composition for treating addiction, for example, the additional (second) therapeutic agent may be a drug that targets opioid receptors, dopamine receptors, serotonin receptors, cannabinoid receptors etc, and that is different from the opioid receptor ligand of the cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate. In an embodiment of a composition for treating Alzheimer's disease, for example, the additional (second) therapeutic agent may be an Alzheimer's disease treatment that is different from the biologically active peptide or protein or therapeutic agent (for treating Alzheimer's disease) of the cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate. In such embodiments, the cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate and the additional (second) therapeutic agent may have a synergistic effect.

(32) Typically, the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions are delivered to appropriate target cells in the individual (e.g., human patient or subject). A target cell is any cell in the CNS. In one embodiment, target cells are neurons. In other embodiments, target cells are non-neuronal cells. Cells to be targeted can be a mix of neuronal and non-neuronal cells. The cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions described herein may be used to treat any type of neurological disease or disorder or disabling condition, including for example, schizophrenia, meningitis, migraine, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's disease, pain and addiction, or a combination thereof.

Cyclic Peptide Combinatorial Libraries and Methods of Use Thereof

(33) Combinatorial libraries that include pluralities of cyclic peptides are described herein. The Examples below describe the generation of a positional-scanning synthetic combinatorial library containing 2,476,099 cyclic peptides (see FIG. 7). This library was made using modified Fmoc SPPS strategy (described in detail in Bionda et al., Eur J Med Chem 2016, 108, 354-363, Dooley, C T, Houghten, R, Life Sciences, 1993, 52: 1509-1517). A combinatorial library of cyclic peptides as described herein can be made using any suitable techniques. Such techniques are well-known in the art. Combinatorial library methods in drug discovery are known and are described, for example, in English, L. B. (2002) Combinatorial library methods and protocols, v. 201, Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.; and Agrafiotis, D. K. et al., (2002) Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1:337-346. Combinatorial libraries such as positional scanning combinatorial libraries are described, for example, in Bionda et al., Eur J Med Chem 2016, 108:354-363; Ruiwu Liu et al., Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2017, 38:117-126; and Humet et al., J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5:597-605; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/145,901. All of these references are incorporated herein by reference.

(34) In one embodiment, a combinatorial library includes a plurality of cyclic peptides of the general Formula I: (X).sub.m-Lys-cyclo-[Cys-Phe-X.sub.1-X.sub.2-X.sub.3-Cys]-Thr (SEQ ID NO: 6). In this formula, X is an amino acid sequence having a length of m amino acids (m is at least 3); X.sub.1 is a basic amino acid; X.sub.2 is an amino acid sequence having a length of 5 amino acids; X.sub.3 is an amino acid sequence having a length of 2 amino acids; and at least one of (X).sub.m and X.sub.2 includes a biologically active peptide or protein (e.g., an opioid receptor ligand or analogue thereof). A cyclic peptide may be a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, X can be any protein or peptide sequence having a length (i.e., m) of at least 3 (e.g., 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) amino acids, but can be up to several thousand amino acids in length. For example, X can be Tyr-Ala-Ser-Pro (SEQ ID NO: 4) which are amino acids 1-4 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO:1). The amino acids of X can be L-amino acids (e.g., all L-amino acids), D-amino acids (e.g., all D-amino acids), nonproteinogenic amino acids, proteinogenic amino acids, peptidomimetics, or a mix thereof. These amino acids can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, or a mix thereof. Generally, the order and types of amino acids is determined based upon the interaction of the cyclic peptide with its biological target(s). In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, X.sub.1 can be any basic amino acid (e.g., Lys, Arg). This amino acid can be a naturally occurring amino acid or a non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acid. X.sub.1 corresponds to position (amino acid) 8 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1). In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, X.sub.2 can be any 5 amino acids, and corresponds to amino acids 9-13 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1). These amino acids can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, or a mix thereof. In a cyclic peptide of Formula 1, the amino acids of X.sub.3 correspond to amino acids 14 and 15 of the naturally occurring OL sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1), and can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, L-amino acids, D-amino acids, or a mix thereof. In a combinatorial library, a combinatorial modification can be done at the N-terminal part of the OL molecule, at the β-turn region, or both.

(35) In another embodiment, a combinatorial library includes a plurality of cyclic peptides of the general Formula II: Tyr-Ala-Ser-Pro-Lys-cyclo [Cys-Phe-Arg-X-Leu-Ala-Cys ]-Thr (SEQ ID NO: 18), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In this formula, X is an amino acid sequence having a length of 5 amino acids and is a mixture of D-amino acids and L-amino acids. These amino acids can be naturally occurring amino acids, non-naturally occurring (synthetic) amino acids, or a mix thereof. In one example of such a combinatorial library, at least a portion of the cyclic peptides have an affinity for at least one opioid receptor and the ability to modulate activity of the at least one opioid receptor (e.g., MOR, KOR and DOR). However, a combinatorial library as described herein can include cyclic peptides that have an affinity for any receptor of interest.

(36) The combinatorial libraries can be used to identify a ligand for a receptor of interest, for example, to identify opioid cyclic peptides that have affinity for an opioid receptor. In one embodiment, a method of identifying at least one opioid cyclic peptide includes screening a combinatorial library as described herein using a suitable assay. Examples of such screening assays include competitive assays such as competition binding assays, competitive inhibition assays, and functional activity assays (e.g. cAMP and β-arrestin assays). Any suitable assays can be used. Additional examples include ex vivo bioassays for screening (e.g., the isolated guinea pig ilieum assay), and screening by administration to suitable animal species (e.g., rodents) and examining relevant physiological or behavioral effects (for opioids, these would include assays of respiration or analgesia, respectively). Once a candidate opioid cyclic peptide, for example, is identified, any suitable assay for testing opioid cyclic peptides for affinity, selectivity and activity can be used. For example, a variety of assays may be employed to test whether the cyclic peptides identified in a combinatorial library as described herein exhibit high affinity and selectivity for an opioid receptor. Receptor assays are well known in the art and μ-opioid receptor (MOR), δ-opioid receptor (DOR), and κ-opioid receptor (KOR) opioid receptors from several species have been cloned. Although these cloned receptors readily allow a particular candidate opioid cyclic peptide to be screened, natural sources of mammalian opioid receptors are also useful for screening, as is well known in the art (Dooley C T et al. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18848-56, 1998). Thus, screening against one or more of MOR, DOR and KOR, whether of recombinant or natural origin, may be carried out in order to determine the selectivity of candidate opioid cyclic peptides for the MOR, DOR or KOR. Additionally, candidate opioid cyclic peptides can be screened by administration to suitable animal species (e.g., rodents) and examining relevant physiological or behavioral effects such as respiration and analgesia.

Methods of Treating Neurological Diseases, Disorders, and Disabling Conditions in an Individual in Need Thereof

(37) Methods of treating neurological diseases, disorders and disabling conditions in an individual in need thereof include administering to the individual a pharmaceutically effective amount of a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein, or a composition including the cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate, for treating (e.g., alleviating, ameliorating, curing) the neurological disease, disorder or disabling condition in the individual, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The methods include administration of any of the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions described herein for treatment of any neurological disease, disorder or disabling condition (e.g., schizophrenia, meningitis, migraine, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's disease, pain, overdose and addiction, etc.). In a typical embodiment, a method of treating a neurological disorder in an individual includes administering to the individual a composition including a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein via intranasal (i.n.) delivery to the individual's brain. In the methods, the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions are capable of specifically binding to olfactory epithelial cells of the nasal mucosa and passaging across the mucosal barrier into the brain of the individual. In some embodiments in which the cyclic peptide includes or is conjugated to an opioid receptor ligand, administration of such a cyclic peptide modulates (e.g., activates or blocks) opioid receptor activity with low toxicity and low immunogenicity, e.g., without affecting normal cell viability in the individual (i.e., viability of the individual's normal (non-diseased) cells).

(38) Cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions for treating neurological diseases, disorders and disabling conditions as described herein can be administered as a monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy with any other therapeutic agent in a method of treating a neurological disease, disorder or disabling condition in an individual in need thereof. In some embodiments of a combination therapy, a first composition may include a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein, and a second composition may include another therapeutic agent. In such embodiments, the first composition may be administered at the same time point or approximately the same time point as the second composition. Alternatively, the first and second compositions may be administered at different time points.

(39) Any suitable methods of administering a cyclic peptide, cyclic peptide conjugate or composition as described herein to an individual may be used. In these methods, the cyclic peptide, cyclic peptide conjugate or composition is administered to an individual intranasally. Methods of preparing a therapeutic agent in a form suitable for i.n. administration are well known in the art and are described, for example, in Bitter et al., Curr Probl Dermatol 2011, 40, 20-35; Pardeshi C. V. and Belgamwar V. S., Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2013, 10(8), 957-972; and Frey W. H., Drug Deliv. Techn. 2002, 2, 46-49, all incorporated herein by reference. The cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates, and compositions described herein may be administered i.n. to an individual (e.g., rodents, humans, nonhuman primates, canines, felines, ovines, bovines) in any suitable formulation according to the methods described in Bitter et al., supra, Pardeshi C. V. and Belgamwar V. S., supra, and Frey W. H., supra, and according to any conventional pharmaceutical practice (see, e.g., Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (21st ed.), ed. A. R. Gennaro, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, (2005) and Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, (3.sup.rd ed.) eds. J. Swarbrick and J. C. Boylan, Marcel Dekker, CRC Press, New York (2006), a standard text in this field, and in USP/NF). To prepare such a formulation, a therapeutically effective amount of a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein is dissolved or suspended in a pharmaceutical carrier or vehicle. A description of exemplary pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and diluents, as well as pharmaceutical formulations, can be found in Remington: supra. Other substances may be added to the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates and compositions to stabilize and/or preserve them.

(40) The therapeutic methods described herein in general include administration of a therapeutically effective amount of the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates, and compositions described herein to an individual (e.g., human) in need thereof, particularly a human. Such treatment will be suitably administered to individuals, particularly humans, suffering from, having, susceptible to, or at risk for a neurological disease, neurological disorder, disabling neurological condition or symptom thereof. Determination of those individuals “at risk” can be made by any objective or subjective determination by a diagnostic test or opinion of a subject or health care provider.

Effective Doses

(41) The cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates, and compositions described herein are preferably administered to an individual in need thereof (e.g., human having one or more neurological diseases, disorders and disabling conditions) in an effective amount, that is, an amount capable of producing a desirable result in a treated individual. In the case of addiction, desirable results include one or more of, for example, prevention of drug reinforcing event, such as morphine conditioned place preference, and prevention of drug-induced reinstatement of extinguished drug-seeking behavior. In the case of schizophrenia, desirable results include for example, amelioration of positive affects (such as hallucinations) or negative effects (such as reversal of catatonia). In the case of meningitis, desirable results include for example, elimination of bacterial infection. In the case of migraine, desirable results include for example, amelioration or elimination of migraine-related pain. In the case of Parkinson's disease, desirable results include for example, restoration of normal locomotor activity and cognitive performance. In the case of Alzheimer's disease, desirable results include for example, restoration of cognitive performance. A therapeutically effective amount for a particular neurological disease, disorder, or disabling condition can be determined according to standard methods. Toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates, and compositions utilized in the methods described herein can be determined by standard pharmaceutical procedures. As is well known in the medical and veterinary arts, dosage for any one individual depends on many factors, including the individual's size, body surface area, age, the particular composition to be administered, time and route of administration, general health, and other drugs being administered concurrently. A delivery dose of a cyclic peptide, cyclic peptide conjugate or composition as described herein is determined based on preclinical efficacy and safety.

Kits

(42) Described herein are kits for treating one or more neurological diseases, disorders, or disabling conditions in a subject. A typical kit includes a composition including a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier (e.g., a physiological buffer) and a therapeutically effective amount of a cyclic peptide or cyclic peptide conjugate as described herein; and instructions for use. A kit for treating a neurological disease, disorder, or disabling condition can also include a second therapeutic agent. Kits also typically include a container and packaging. Instructional materials for preparation and use of the compositions described herein are generally included. While the instructional materials typically include written or printed materials, they are not limited to such. Any medium capable of storing such instructions and communicating them to an end user is encompassed by the kits herein. Such media include, but are not limited to electronic storage media. Such media may include addresses to internet sites that provide such instructional materials.

EXAMPLES

(43) The present invention is further illustrated by the following specific examples. The examples are provided for illustration only and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any way.

Example 1—Novel Cyclic Peptide-Based Platform for Intranasal Drug Delivery to the Brain

(44) Diseases of the CNS such as schizophrenia, meningitis, migraine, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease, along with other neurological disorders such as addiction, require delivery of the drug to the brain for effective treatment. However, conventional drug delivery methods are inefficient in delivering a number of therapeutic agents to the brain, especially hydrophilic and large molecular weight (MW) drugs such as peptides and proteins. Both the BBB and BCB restrict the transport of these therapeutic agents from systemic circulation into the CNS. The data described below demonstrate the utility of the cyclic peptide-based platform for i.n. drug delivery to the brain, including novel CNS peptide-based drugs suitable for i.n. delivery that have high selectivity, in vivo efficacy and tolerance. This approach to deliver peptide-based drug directly to the brain via the i.n. route has a variety of therapeutic and prophylactic applications, including, as non-limiting examples: analgesics, anti-convulsants, antidotes, addiction, anti-viral, antibiotics, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and anti-neurodegenerative.

(45) Individual Peptide Synthesis

(46) The OL natural product (Li et al., PLoS One 2008, 3 (6), e2381), its analogues, and a control cyclic peptide composed of a randomly permutated OL sequence were synthesized, using a standard Fmoc-solid phase approach and on-resin disulfide bond formation by I.sub.2 oxidation, Table 1. All peptides were purified by RP-HPLC and characterized by MALDI-TOF MS and analytical RP-HPLC.

(47) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 1 Receptor binding affinities (K.sub.d/Nm) of OL and related peptides. Opioid receptors** Asialofetuin* δ μ K OL 6.4 × 10.sup.4 n.o. n.o. n.o. DADLE 8 ± 3 (2.3) 9 ± 2 (11.4)  58 ± 22 DADLE-OL 4.2 × 10.sup.4  64 ± 26 3538 ± 945 >10.sup.4 DADLE-OL II 3.3 × 10.sup.4 275 ± 23 123 ± 41 1082 ± 139 Control 7.6 × 10.sup.5 >10.sup.4 >10.sup.4 >10.sup.4 n.o.: no binding observed under applied experimental conditions. Control: RVFSL-cyclo[CNATYPYKGAC]P (SEQ ID NO: 19) *K.sub.d values for asialofetuin were determined by ITC. **K.sub.d values were determined in a protein binding radioassay. DADLE-OL: bioactive sequence grafted in the β-turn region. DADLE-OL II: YaGFlK-cyclo[CFRYPNGVLAC]T (SEQ ID NO: 9); bioactive sequence grafted in the N-terminal region. Parenthesis: literature data (Janecka et al. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2003, 92 (443), 83-91)
Binding Studies

(48) Grafting the DADLE fragment into the OL scaffold resulted in a novel cyclic opioid-like peptide (DADLE-OL) retaining the functional properties of the parent peptides, FIG. 2. DADLE-OL exhibits almost identical affinity toward L-fucose bearing asialofetuin (model glycoprotein) as the unmodified OL, Table 1. In addition, DADLE-OL binds DOR with an affinity approximately one order of magnitude lower than DADLE, but improved selectivity for DOR over MOR, Table 1. The lack of a positively charged N-terminal Tyr residue and the conformational constraint may explain lower affinity of DADLE-OL toward DOR in comparison to DADLE. The unmodified OL does not bind any of the three opioid receptors tested, Table 1. To confirm that the residues 5-7, 16 and 17 in the OL scaffold are crucial for fucose binding, a control peptide composed of a scrambled OL sequence was synthesized, Table 1. As expected, affinity of the control peptide toward asialofetuin is significantly lower compared to OL, indicating that these residues are not amenable to modification. Similar affinity toward asialofetuin was observed for DADLE-OL II. However, this peptide exhibits lower affinity toward DOR and does not discriminate between MOR and DOR.

(49) In Vivo Activity

(50) OL and its analogue DADLE-OL can be detected in the mouse brain 30 minutes after i.n. administration, and it was eliminated from the brain in about 240 minutes, FIG. 3A. The level of OL in the mouse brain at the selected time intervals parallels those in the mouse nose. The level of DADLE-OL in the mouse brain 30 minutes after i.n. administration was identical to the level of OL, indicating that grafting of DADLE sequence into OL did not affect its nose-to-brain transfer ability, FIG. 3B. No DADLE-OL was detected in the mouse brain 30 and 60 minutes after i.p. administration. The functional activity of DADLE-OL was evaluated by antinociception produced in vivo in mice measured with the 55° C. warm water tail-withdrawal test, FIG. 4. Although no adverse effects were observed in mice at the highest tested i.n. doses of OL and DADLE-OL, only DADLE-OL exhibited dose- and time-dependent antinociception. Significant effects were observed at all tested doses 2 minutes after i.n. administration, with the peak effect 30 minutes after administration of 600 μg, FIG. 4. DADLE-OL failed to show significant antinociceptive activity after i.p. administration, and i.n. administration of the individual parent peptides, DADLE and OL, did not themselves produce antinociception. Furthermore, when DADLE-OL was administered to mice lacking MOR or KOR, or to mice pretreated with the opioid antagonist naloxone or DOR-selective antagonist naltrindole, the tail withdrawal test results show a decreased response only in mice lacking MOR and in mice pretreated with naloxone, suggesting that DADLE-OL-mediated antinociception was predominantly MOR-mediated. This is expected because DADLE-OL does not bind KOR, Table 1, and because of its mixed MOR/DOR activity, similar to the parent DADLE.

(51) Although DADLE-OL induces significant antinociceptive effects in mice following i.n. administration, no impairment in motor coordination was observed using the rotarod test. In contrast, U50,488, a κ-opioid receptor agonist used as a positive control, significantly impaired motor coordination in mice following i.p. administration. To demonstrate that the ligands exhibiting different opioid activity can be delivered into the brain via the i.n. route, a TIPP-OL analogue was prepared, FIG. 5. This analogue was prepared by grafting (conjugating) a sequence of known DOR antagonist TIPP (Tyr-Tic-Phe-PheOH [SEQ ID NO: 2]) (Schiller et al. Biopolymers 1999, 51 (6), 411-25.), using the same synthetic approach as described previously. As shown in FIG. 5, TIPP-OL fully antagonizes the effect of a potent DOR agonist SNC-80 in mice. In this experiment SNC-80 was i.c.v. administered following pretreatment with i.n. administration of TIPP-OL.

(52) Based on the literature evidences showing that opioid compounds with mixed i agonist/δ antagonist properties may exhibit an antinociceptive effect with low propensity to induce side effects, bifunctional OL analogue, TIPP-EM1-OL, containing the i agonist endomorphin 1 (EM1) (Zadina et al., Nature. 1997; 386(6624):499-502, Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH.sub.2 (SEQ ID NO: 3) grafted into the N-terminus and 6 antagonist TIPP grafted into the β-turn region of the OL scaffold, was prepared, FIG. 6. Although not as potent as other OL analogues, TIPP-EM1-OL exhibits antinociceptive effects in mice following the i.n. administration. This experiment unequivocally demonstrated the suitability of the odorranalectin scaffold for a variety of chemical modifications (e.g., insertion of peptide sequences composed of L-, D- and nonproteinogenic amino acids; insertion of peptidomimetics; insertion of small molecules; insertion of proteins).

(53) Optimization of OL-based Opioid Ligands

(54) To validate this approach and to identify novel opioid ligands based on the OL scaffold, a focused PSCL of 2,476,099 cyclic peptides was produced, and this library was screened for affinity toward μ, δ and κ opioid receptors. The cyclic peptides in the prepared combinatorial library possess an unmodified fucose binding region (residues 5-7, 16 and 17 of SEQ ID NO: 1), whereas the sequence responsible for opioid receptors binding (residues 9-13 of SEQ ID NO: 1) was randomized.

(55) Library Synthesis

(56) The cyclic peptide synthetic combinatorial library was generated by the process of divide, couple and recombine using 19 commercially available D- and L-amino acids (Cys is omitted to avoid formation of more than one disulfide bond) using modified Fmoc SPPS strategy previously developed (Bionda et al., Eur J Med Chem 2016, 108, 354-363; Dooley, C T, Houghten, R, Life Sciences, 1993, 52: 1509-1517), FIG. 7. The comparison of several endogenous and synthetic opioid ligands showed that the opioid peptide sequence needs the presence of Pro or D-amino acid in position 2 for good interaction with opioid receptors. To maintain the same order of D- and L-amino acids as they appear in the sequences of these opioid ligands in the synthesized cyclic peptides, position 10 contains D-amino acids (corresponds to the position 2 in the sequences of endogenous and synthetic opioid ligands) whereas remaining positions in the OL sequence responsible for opioid activity were composed of L-amino acids. Using this approach, five sets of 95 cyclic peptide sub-libraries were prepared. The first set of 19 sub-libraries had specifically defined amino acids in position 9 of the sequence, and the remaining four positions consisted of mixtures of the 19 D- or 19 L-amino acids. The next set of cyclic peptide sub-libraries were defined by the amino acid in position 10, and the remaining positions contained all possible amino acid combinations. This process was thus repeated for the remaining amino acid residues. Variable positions were incorporated by coupling of a mixture of 19 Fmoc-protected amino acids in predetermined molar ratios to compensate for different coupling rates. However, protocol for on-resin disulfide bond formation using an oxidizing agent had to be optimized to avoid or minimize Met oxidation and Trp-peptide bond cleavage. For this purpose, use of N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) was explored as an oxidizing agent for on-resin disulfide formation. Based on the literature reports, NCS is compatible with oxidation-prone Met and Trp, and it is compatible with peptides containing Boc and Trt protecting groups. It was found that 1.1 eq of NCS over a 1.5 hour period leads to complete disulfide bond formation with cca 60% Met oxidation. However, oxidized Met residues in peptide thioesters can be reduced rapidly with NH.sub.4I to the corresponding sulfide by using (CH.sub.3).sub.2S as co-reductant. Addition of 20 eq of NH.sub.4I and 20 eq of (CH.sub.3).sub.2S into the reaction mixture and shaking this mixture at room temperature for 2 hours resulted in complete reduction of oxidized Met without destruction of the existing disulfide bridge. Under the applied experimental conditions for on-resin disulfide bond formation, no cleavage of tryptophanyl peptide bond was observed. The completion of peptide coupling was monitored by the Kaiser (ninhidryn) test and the Ellman test was carried out to monitor the completion of disulfide bond formation. Using the described optimized synthetic strategy, a PSCL containing 2,476,099 cyclic peptides was generated, FIG. 7.

(57) Library Screening for Binding to Opioid Receptors

(58) The prepared PSCL was screened for the identification of novel cyclic opioid-like peptides in three different competitive assays using human opioid clones expressed in CHO cells. Competition binding assays were conducted using [.sup.3H]-DAMGO, [.sup.3H]-DSLET and [.sup.3H ]-U69,593 as MOR, DOR and KOR radioligands, respectively. In brief, binding assays were carried out in 1 mL polypropylene tubes in a 96-well format, and the reaction was terminated by filtration through GF-B filters. Bound radioactivity was counted on an LKB β-plate Liquid Scintillation Counter. Competitive inhibition assays were performed using 0.2 and 1 mg/mL of peptide mixtures. The assays were repeated twice. Screening assay showed significantly stronger affinities of synthesized peptides toward MOR than toward DOR and KOR. Use of 1 mg/mL of peptide mixtures in the screening assays clearly indicated amino acid residues responsible for selective DOR and KOR binding. On the other hand, 0.2 mg/mL of peptide mixtures showed significant inhibition (up to 60%) of radioligand binding only for MOR. Amino acid residues that drive opioid receptor selectivity are shown in Table 2. The performed screening assay provided valuable structure-binding data and clearly demonstrated the feasibility of this approach to identify individual OL-based cyclic peptides selective for MOR, DOR and KOR.

(59) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 2 Selected amino acid residues responsible for selective MOR, DOR and KOR binding. Cyclic peptide sequence: NH.sub.2CO-T-cyclo[C-A-L-X.sub.5-X.sub.6-X.sub.7-X.sub.8-X.sub.9-R-F- C]-K-P-S-A-Y-NH.sub.2 Position Receptor X.sub.5 X.sub.6 X.sub.7 X.sub.8 X.sub.9 MOR N V P v H H T p M P DOR G S V l A D E T d D P p F g l KOR R K R m R P W A l P A v f

Example 2—Additional Cyclic Compounds and Use Thereof

(60) Modification of the N-terminal Part of OL

(61) DADLE-OL II was prepared to assess the effect of modification of the N-terminal part of OL on the peptide's biological activity, FIG. 8. In the DADLE-OL II, OL's four N-terminal amino acids (Tyr.sup.1-Ala.sup.2-Ser.sup.3-Pro.sup.4) (SEQ ID NO: 4) were replaced with the DADLE sequence. As shown in Table 1, DADLE-OL II binds asialofetuin with an affinity (K.sub.d=33 μM) similar to OL (K.sub.d=42 μM), Table 1, suggesting that this modification does not affect the peptide's binding to carbohydrates and thus its ability to transit from nose to the brain. However, lower affinity (K.sub.d=275 nM) was determined for DOR in comparison to DADLE-OL (K.sub.d=64 nM) and this peptide does not discriminate between MOR and DOR, Table 1. The assessment of this peptide's activity in the 55° C. warm water tail-withdrawal test, FIG. 8, demonstrated that the modification of the N-terminal part also leads to an active analogue in vivo. Lower activity of DADLE-OL II in the tail-withdrawal test in mice in comparison to the DADLE-OL can be explained by this peptide's lower affinity toward DOR.

(62) Identified Novel Cyclic Peptide Opioid Ligands

(63) Opioid receptors are key targets in the management of pain. Most clinically used opioid drugs are MOR agonists, with liabilities of tolerance, physical dependence and addiction mediated by this receptor. Activation of the other opioid receptors also produces analgesia, but with unique strengths and liabilities. DOR agonists produce minimal analgesia in acute pain models, but have been speculated to generate analgesia in models of chronic pain, perhaps because DOR responses are up-regulated. Like the MOR, the DOR positively modulates the rewarding state, but seemingly to a lesser extent, suggesting a lower abuse liability than MOR agonists. In contrast, KOR agonists are effective pain suppressors and unlike MOR agonists, do not cause respiratory failure or impair GI transit. KORs are located in the spinal cord and the brain stem and part of their analgesic effect is due to the direct inhibition of neuronal pathways transmitting nociceptive (pain) information.

(64) Moreover, KOR agonists not only possess analgesic activity but also exhibit anti-inflammatory activity, suggesting their potential value in the treatment of these conditions. KOR agonists developed to date also exhibit undesirable dysphoria and aversion attributed to KOR suppression of dopamine and serotonin release. Still, considering the benefits KOR offer in regulating pain and inflammation and the absence of abuse, novel KOR agonists lacking the undesirable side effects represent an attractive lead compounds for the development of novel classes of drugs for pain. Serotonin and norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as antidepressant drugs amitriptyline and doxepin, represent another class of pain medication that has been successfully used for the management of chronic neuropathic pain. However, SNRIs have not been successful in all pain conditions and the pain-relieving properties of these drugs may not be efficacious for pain related to severe trauma. Alternatively, combining KOR agonist activity with norepinephrine and/or serotonin delivery into the brain may improve chronic pain management when more than one physiological mechanism or system is implicated and may potentially minimize side effects associated with the KOR activation.

(65) To further identify novel and unique opioid-OL peptides based on the strategy above, an OL-based PSCL (95 mixtures containing a total of 2,476,099 distinct cyclic peptides) was prepared and these mixtures were screened for binding affinity to human MOR, DOR and KOR expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The cyclic peptides in the PSCL possess an unmodified L-fucose binding region (residues 5-7, 16 and 17 of SEQ ID NO:1), whereas the sequence responsible for opioid receptors binding (residues 9-13 of SEQ ID NO:1) was randomized. Amino acid residues found to convey opioid receptor selectivity are shown in Table 2. The novel MOR agonist (OLMOR-L1 FIG. 9A) showed dose-dependent antinociception, FIG. 9B, and approximately 20% improvement in analgesic activity using the 55° C. warm water tail-withdrawal test at 3× lower concentrations (200 ug/mL) over the parent DADLE-OL (600 ug/mL), FIG. 9C. However, OLMOR-L1 did not show the desired MOR selectivity in the tail-withdrawal assay using the knockout mice, FIG. 9D. As shown in FIG. 10, OLMOR-L1 did not affect motor coordination and balance in mice using the rotarod test, suggesting a possibility for fewer side effects. In addition, this peptide did not induce significant conditioned place preference or aversion in mice. A lack of conditioned place preference observed for OLMOR-L1 could possibly be explained by this peptide's absence of in vivo selectivity toward opioid receptors. With synthesis and assessing the analgesic activity of OLMOR-L1 in a tail-withdrawal assay, it was demonstrated that it is possible to identify more potent OL-base opioid ligands using the described combinatorial chemistry approach.

(66) Similarly, a novel OL-based KOR ligand, OLKOR-L1, was identified based on the OL combinatorial library screening, FIG. 11 and Table 2. Marked improvement in analgesic activity was observed for OLKOR-L1, FIGS. 12 and 13C. OLKOR-L1 exhibited dose and time dependent antinociception in the mouse 55° C. warm water tail withdrawal assay following i.n. administration, with the peak activity observed after 30 minutes at a dose of 60 μg/mL. At 60 μg/mL OLKOR-L1 showed approximately 20% more potent antinociception in mice than the DADLE-OL at 600 μg/mL measured with the tail withdrawal test, FIG. 12. Importantly, OLKOR-L1 also exhibits antiallodynic effects in the mouse chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain, FIG. 13C. In this experiment, the analgesic efficacy of OLKOR-L1 (200 μg, i.n.) was comparable to the effect of morphine (10 mg/kg, i.p.), but with reduced loss of activity over 80 minutes as was the case for morphine. Importantly, no impairment in motor coordination in mice was observed in the rotarod test, FIG. 10, and no other adverse effects were observed following the i.n. administration of OLKOR-L1 (100 μg), positioning OLKOR-L1 as a significant improvement over traditional opioid drugs. In addition, the conditioned place preference (CPP) data indicated that OLKOR-L1 does not produce reward (characteristic of morphine) nor conditioned place aversion (CPA)—characteristic of traditional dysphoria produced by KOR agonists) in mice.

(67) Neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine have been implicated as primary mediators of endogenous analgesic mechanisms in the pain pathway. Preclinical data suggests that persistent and neuropathic pain may be inhibited by enhancement of serotonin and norepinephrine transition, and deficiencies in one or both of these neurotransmitters may contribute to perception of pain. Moreover, animal studies have shown that SNRIs block pain-related behaviors. To test if the combination of KOR agonist activity with simultaneous delivery of norepinephrine and/or serotonin into the brain may improve OLKOR-L1 analgesic activity as well as neutralize the undesired side effects associated with KOR activation (polypharmacy approach), an OLKOR-L1 analogue was prepared. N-terminal Tyr.sup.1 and Ala.sup.2 in the OLKOR-L1 sequence that are rapidly hydrolyzed under physiologically relevant conditions are ideally suited for replacement with 5-hydroxy tryptophan (5-HTrp), L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), or their analogues and thus for the delivery of these molecules to the brain. OLKOR-L1 possessing N-terminal 5-HTrp (OLKOR-L1-5HTrp) was prepared, FIG. 11, and its in vivo activity was assessed, FIG. 13. OLKOR-L1-5HTrp exhibited dose and time dependent antinociception in the mouse 55° C. warm water tail withdrawal assay following i.n. administration, with the peak activity observed after 30 minutes at a dose of 60 μg/mL, FIG. 13A. In comparison to the parent OLKOR-L1 and the controls, morphine and gabapentin, OLKOR-L1-5HTrp (200 μg, i.n.) showed significant improvement in the analgesic efficacy in the tail-withdrawal assay, FIG. 13B, and in the CCI model, FIG. 13C. The CPP data indicated that OLKOR-L1 and its analogue OLKOR-L1-5HTrp do not produce reward in mice, characteristic of morphine. However, OLKOR-L1-5HTrp produced CPA in mice, much like the KOR agonist U50,488 used as a control. Conditioned place aversion was not observed for the parent peptide OLKOR-L1, suggesting a possibility that this undesired effect can be eliminated by further structural optimization.

(68) Following intranasal administration of OLKOR-L1 or its analogue OLKOR-L1-5HTrp to knockout (KO) mice lacking MOR, DOR or KOR, the tail withdrawal test showed a significantly decreased response in KOR-KO mice, suggesting that OLKOR-L1/OLKOR-L1-5HTrp-mediated antinociception was predominantly KOR-mediated.

(69) Overall, OLKOR-L1 and its analogue OLKOR-L1-5HTrp are promising analgesic with efficacy comparable to clinically used drugs such as morphine and gabapentin in a battery of pain assays but with longer duration and fewer side effects.

(70) Analysis of the mouse brain 30 min after intranasal delivery of OLKOR-L1-5HTrp using RP-HPLC method with electrochemical detection showed significant increase in 5-HTrp accumulation in the midbrain, FIG. 14. Anatomical and physiological studies identified the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) and its descending projections to the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) and spinal cord dorsal horn, as a primary anatomical pathway mediating opioid-based analgesia. Thus, presence of OLKOR-L1-5HTrp and 5-HTrp in the mid brain may explain this peptide's analgesic activity.

(71) These data clearly demonstrated that using the approach of grafting (conjugating) a bioactive sequence (biologically active peptide or protein) into the OL scaffold (SEQ ID NO: 1) described herein can not only deliver known opioid peptide ligands into the brain, but also can generate novel ligands with improved activity and without undesirable side effects.

(72) Peptides Stability Under Physiologically Relevant Conditions and Mode of Action Stability of DADLE-OL in 100% human cerebrospinal fluid and 100% mouse brain homogenate at 37° C. was determined. The disappearance of the intact peptides and formation of proteolytic products was monitored by RP-HPLC and MALDI TOF mass spectrometry. As in the case of the natural product OL, proteolytic cleavage of the N-terminal Tyr.sup.1 and Ala.sup.2 in the DADLE OL was observed almost immediately in the 100% mouse brain homogenate. After incubation for 24 hours the fragment 1 is isolated as the only remaining fragment (shown in FIG. 15). In contrast, no degradation of DADLE-OL was observed in 100% human CSF even after incubation for 24 h. These data suggest that DADLE-OL acts as a prodrug. Once diffused into the brain, DOR active sequence is released due to proteolytic hydrolysis of DADLE-OL. Fragment 1 was synthesized, and activities of the parent DADLE-OL and fragment 1 were tested in the cAMP inhibition assay (cAMP AlphaScreen™ Assay, Perkin Elmer). As shown in FIG. 15B, fragment 1 inhibited cAMP production with IC50 value of 26.8 nM, whereas no activity was observed for the cyclic peptide DADLE-OL under the same experimental conditions. These data suggest that DADLE-OL acts as a prodrug.

OTHER EMBODIMENTS

(73) Any improvement may be made in part or all of the cyclic peptides, cyclic peptide conjugates, composition, kits, and method steps. All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended to illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. Any statement herein as to the nature or benefits of the invention or of the preferred embodiments is not intended to be limiting, and the appended claims should not be deemed to be limited by such statements. More generally, no language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as being essential to the practice of the invention. This invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contraindicated by context.