FUSION CONSTRUCTS AND USES THEREOF

Abstract

Fusion constructs are described. A fusion construct contains a peptide of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO: 28, fused to a peptide or protein (e.g., an antibody). As compared to the peptide or protein, fusion constructs exhibits improved penetration through the BBB, and are released on the abluminal surface of the BBB, after the post-luminal surface uptake. Fusion constructs could be used in drug discovery, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of diseases.

Claims

1. A fusion construct of Formula I:
M-L-C(Formula I), wherein M is selected from the group consisting of antibodies, pronectins, affibodies, affilins, anticalins, atrimers, avimers, DARPins, fynomers, bicyclic peptides, and other non-antibody proteins, L is an optional linker, and C is a peptide containing or consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO: 28.

2. The fusion construct of claim 1, wherein M is an antibody.

3. The fusion construct of claim 2, wherein the amino-terminus of the peptide SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO:39 is fused to either the carboxyl-terminus or the amino-terminus of light or heavy chain of the antibody either monovalently or multivalently.

4. The fusion construct of claim 3, wherein the amino-terminus of the peptide SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO: 28 is fused to the carboxyl-terminus of the heavy chain of the antibody either monovalently or multivalently.

5. The fusion construct of claim 2, wherein the amino-terminus of the peptide SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO:39 is fused to both the carboxyl-terminus and the amino-terminus of light or heavy chain of the antibody either monovalently or multivalently.

6. The fusion construct of claim 4, which avoids entrapment and degrades at a slower rate in the endothelial endosomal-lysosomal system than the antibody.

7. The fusion construct of claim 4, which has an improved blood-brain barrier permeability than the antibody.

8. The fusion construct of claim 4, which has a better brain retention than the antibody

9. The fusion construct of claim 4 which has a lower effective therapeutic dose than the antibody.

10. The fusion construct of claim 2, wherein the antibody comprises (a) a heavy chain variable region comprising CDR1 represented by sequence GFTFNTYA (SEQ ID NO: 7), CDR2 represented by IRSKSNNYAT (SEQ ID NO: 8), and CDR3 represented by VGGGDF (SEQ ID NO: 9) or a sequence homologous to SEQ ID NO: 9; and (b) a light chain variable region comprising CDR1 represented by sequence QEISVY (SEQ ID NO: 10), CDR2 represented by sequence GAF (SEQ ID NO: 11), and CDR3 represented by sequence LQYVRYPWT (SEQ ID NO: 12).

11. The fusion construct of claim 10, wherein the antibody has a binding affinity (KD) for TauC3 of from 110.sup.9 to 110.sup.12 and an off-rate (K.sub.d) of 110.sup.3 from 110.sup.4 to 110.sup.2 s.sup.1, and a binding affinity (KD) for SEQ ID NO:1 of from 110.sup.4 to 110.sup.8 M, or no detectable binding with SEQ ID NO:1.

12. The fusion construct of claim 11, wherein the antibody shows no detectable binding with SEQ ID NO:1.

13. A method of treating a tauopathy comprising administering to a patient an effective amount of the fusion construct of claim 2, wherein the tauopathy is selected from the group consisting of Pick's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and multiple sclerosis.

14. The fusion construct of claim 13, wherein the tauopathy is Alzheimer's disease.

15. A method of delivering peptides across blood-brain barrier (BBB) comprising fusing carboxyl-terminus of a peptide to the amino-terminus of a peptide containing SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO: 28, directly or through a linker, and placing the resulting fusion construct in contact with the BBB.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the resulting fusion construct is a construct according to claim 1.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the peptide is an antibody.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the antibody comprises (a) a heavy chain variable region comprising CDR1 represented by sequence GFTFNTYA (SEQ ID NO: 7, CDR2 represented by IRSKSNNYAT (SEQ ID NO: 8, and CDR3 represented by VGGGDF (SEQ ID NO: 9); and (b) a light chain variable region comprising CDR1 represented by sequence QEISVY (SEQ ID NO: 10), CDR2 represented by sequence GAF (SEQ ID NO: 11), and CDR3 represented by sequence LQYVRYPWT (SEQ ID NO: 12).

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the antibody has a binding affinity (KD) for TauC3 of from 110.sup.9 to 110.sup.12 and an off-rate (K.sub.d) of 110.sup.3 or less (e.g., from 110.sup.4 to 110.sup.2 s.sup.1), and a binding affinity (KD) for SEQ ID NO:1 of from 110.sup.4 to 110.sup.8 M, or no detectable binding with SEQ ID NO:1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0088] FIG. 1A depicts SDS-Page of the fusion construct of Example 1. Lane M1: Protein Marker, TaKaRa, Cat. No. 3452. Lane 1: Reducing condition. Lane 2: Non-reducing condition.

[0089] FIG. 1B depicts Western blot analysis of the fusion construct of Example 1. Lane M2: Protein Marker, GenScript, Cat. No. M00521. Lane 1: Reducing condition. Lane 2: Non-reducing condition. Lane P: Human IgG1, Kappa (Sigma, Cat.No.I5154) as a positive control.

[0090] FIG. 2 contains images of TBL-100 at 24 hour of incubation.

[0091] FIG. 3 contains images of TBL-110 at 24 hour of incubation.

[0092] FIG. 4 contains images of TBL-100 at 24 hour of incubation. Despite similar staining patterns for Transferrin, Receptor and LAMP2, signal from each can be detected in unique locations. LAMP2 signal not colocalized with Transferrin Receptor.

[0093] FIG. 5 contains images of TBL-110 at 24 hour of incubation. Despite similar staining patterns for Transferrin, Receptor and LAMP2, signal from each can be detected in unique locations. Transferrin Receptor signal not colocalized with LAMP2.

[0094] FIG. 6 contains images of TBL-110 at 24 hour of incubation. Pattern of TBL-110 signal appears to be more diffuse than the corresponding transferrin receptor and LAMP2 signal, which may suggest post-uptake release or internalization by an alternative mechanism.

[0095] FIG. 7 contains images of TBL-110 at 24 hour of incubation. Pattern of TBL-110 signal appears to be more diffuse than the corresponding transferrin receptor and LAMP2 signal, which may suggest post-uptake release or internalization by an alternative mechanism i.e. outside of the endosomal-lysosomal system. Diffuse TBL-110 signal not colocalized with puncta.

[0096] FIG. 8 contains images of TBL-100 Versus TBL-110 24 Hour Incubation.

[0097] FIG. 9 shows calculation of statistical significance.

[0098] FIG. 10 shows antibody intensity retained within cell at 3 hour test article incubation.

[0099] FIG. 11 shows antibody intensity retained within cell at 6 hour test article incubation.

[0100] FIG. 12 shows antibody intensity retained within cell at 24 hour test article incubation.

[0101] FIG. 13 shows antibody intensity retained within cell at 24 hour test article incubation. Increased retention of TBL-100 following Bafilomycin treatment (which disrupts lysosomal degradation) suggests that, when internalized, it enters and is cleared by the lysosome.

[0102] FIG. 14 shows antibody intensity retained within cell at 24 hour test article incubation. Higher levels of TBL-110 in both the presence ( . . . ) and absence ( ) of Bafilomycin treatment indicates that it is internalized and retained more readily than TBL-100.

[0103] FIG. 15 shows TBL-100 intensity retained at 3 hour, 6 hour and 24 hour.

[0104] FIG. 16 shows TBL-110 intensity retained at 3 hour, 6 hour and 24 hour.

[0105] FIG. 17 shows TBL100/TBL110 colocalization with transferrin receptor at 24 hours. No significant differences in intensity of either TBL-100 or TBL-110 in masks drawn based on intensity of the transferrin receptor at 24 hours would suggest that neither test article preferentially co-localizes with the receptor.

[0106] FIG. 18 shows TBL100/TBL110 colocalization with transferrin receptor at 3 hour incubation and 6 hour incubation. Pattern of significant increase in TBL-100 colocalization with the Transferrin Receptor at 6 hours suggests rapid transport into cell by this mechanism.

[0107] FIG. 19 shows TBL-100/TBL-110 colocoalization with LAMP2 at 24 hour test article incubation.

[0108] FIG. 20 shows TBL-100/TBL-110 colocoalization with LAMP2 at 24 hour test article incubation. Similar to the trends of TBL-100 and TBL-110 intensity quantified throughout the cell, higher levels of both test articles were colocalized with LAMP2 signal following Bafilomycin treatment. This indicates that when high levels of the test articles accumulate intracellularly, they are targeted to lysosomes.

[0109] FIG. 21 shows TBL-100/TBL-110 colocoalization with LAMP2 at 3 and 6 hour test article incubation. Higher levels of colocalization of TBL-100 with LAMP2 at these early time points indicates rapid clearance of this test article once internalized. TBL-110 is not cleared by the lysosome as readily and therefore can accumulate.

[0110] FIG. 22 shows relative transferrin receptor intensity per cell at 3 hour test incubation. No significant differences in transferrin receptor intensity per cell following any of the various combinations of test article and bafilomycin treatment.

[0111] FIG. 23 shows relative transferrin receptor intensity per cell at 6 hour test incubation. No significant differences in transferrin receptor intensity per cell following any of the various combinations of test article and bafilomycin treatment.

[0112] FIG. 24 shows relative transferrin receptor intensity per cell at 24 hour test incubation. No significant differences in transferrin receptor intensity per cell following any of the various combinations of test article and bafilomycin treatment.

[0113] FIG. 25 shows relative LAMP2 intensity per cell at 3 hour test article incubation. No significant differences in LAMP2 intensity per cell following any of the various combinations of test article and bafilomycin treatment.

[0114] FIG. 26 shows relative LAMP2 intensity per cell at 6 hour test article incubation. No significant differences in LAMP2 intensity per cell following any of the various combinations of test article and bafilomycin treatment.

[0115] FIG. 27 shows relative LAMP2 intensity per cell at 24 hour test article incubation. No significant differences in LAMP2 intensity per cell following any of the various combinations of test article and bafilomycin treatment.

[0116] FIG. 28 depicts cartoon-structures of protein scaffolds, and was adopted from Simeone et al., Protein Cell 2018. 9(1):3-14.

[0117] FIGS. 29A-29E depict immunohistochemical images made in Example 4.

[0118] FIG. 30 is a quantitative representation of the immunohistochemical images analyzed for statistical significance Example 4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0119] Short peptides can be fused to the N-terminus or C-terminus of antibody light or heavy chains (or both) without affecting antibody conformation or potency.

M of Fusion Constructs of Formula I

[0120] In certain embodiments, M of Fusion constructs of Formula I is selected from the group containing or consisting of pronectins (e.g., angiocept), affibodies (e.g., ABY-025, SOBI002, ABY-035), affilins (e.g., PRS-010, PRS-050), anticalins (e.g., PRS-080, PRS-060, PRS-110, PRS-343), atrimers (e.g., ATX 3105), avimers (e.g., AMG220), DARPins (e.g., MP0112, MP0260, MP0250, MP0274), fynomers (e.g., COVA322, COVA208, Knottin, Kuntizt domain), bicyclic peptides, and other non-antibody proteins.

A of Fusion Constructs of Formula II

[0121] In certain embodiments, A of the fusion construct of Formula II may be selected from the group consisting of U.S. Pat. No. 2,398,852 (Dezamizumab), AAB-001 (Bapineuzumab), ABBV-066 (Risankizumab), ABBV-323, ABBV-323, ABBV-8E12 (C2N 8E12), ABL-001 (Asciminib), ABL301, ABP-710 (Infliximab), ABT-165, ABT-414 (Depatuxizumab), ACZ885 (Canakinumab), ADC-1013, ADCT-402, ALD403 (Eptinezumab), ALX0061 (Vobarilizumab), AMG301 (Aimovig), AMG330, ANB020, ARGX-110, ARGX-111, ASKP1240 (Bleselumab), ATN-103 (Ozoralizumab), BAN0805 (ABBV-0805), BAN2401 (mab158), BAY 1351 (Nerelimomab), B-E8 (Elsilimomab), Bertilimumab, BI 655064, BI 655066, BI 695500, BI 695501, BIM 037 (Aducanumab), BIIB033 (Opicinumab), BIIB054 (Cinpanemab), BIIB074 (Vixotrigine), BIIB076, BMS-936561, Brolucizumab, BT-061 (Tregalizumab), C225 (cetuximab), CAT-192 (Metelimumab), CC-90002 (INBRX-103), CLNH11 (Pritumumab), cmt 412 (Priliximab), DB00028 (Gamunex), DB00073 (Rituximab), DB00095 (Efalizumab), DB00108 (Natalizumab), DB05459 (Briakinumab), DB05656 (Veltuzumab), DB06162 (Lumiliximab), DB06241 (Clenoliximab), DB06606 (Teplizumab), DB06650 (Ofatumumab), DB08935 (Obinutuzumab), DB09052 (Blinatumomab), DB11767 (Sarilumab), DB11803 (Sirukumab), DB11988 (Ocrelizumab), DB12053 (Visilizumab), DB12169 (Tralokinumab), DB12294 (Anrukinzumab), DB12636 (Samalizumab), DB12849 (Clazakizumab), DB13127 (Olokizumab), DB14004 (Tildrakizumab), DB14039 (Erenumab), DB14041 (Fremanezumab), DI-Leu16-IL2), Fazinumab, GC-1008 (Fresolimumab), GSE64382 (Itolizumab), GSK2862277, GSK3050002, GSK3174998, GSK3772847, GZ402668, HLX01, HLX03 (Adalimumab), Herceptin, Humax-TAC-ADC, Humax-TAC-PBD, Inebilizumab, Inolimomab, IPH33, IPH52, JNJ-63709178, JNJ-63733657, JNJ-64007957, KHK4083, KHK6640, LY2062430 (Solanezumab), LY2599666, LY2951742 (Galcanezumab), LY3303560, MCLA-117, MEDI1341, MEDI1814, MEDI2070 (Brazikumab), MEN112, Mogamulizumab, NEOD001, Nesvacumab, Odulimomab, PF-04360365 (Ponezumab), PMN310, PRX002/R07046015, QAX576, REGN1979, REGN3500, RG1450 (Gantenerumab), RG6026, RG6100, RG6168, RG7412 (Crenzumab), RG7716, RG7828, RG7876, RG7935, RN624 (Tanezumab), RO 7105705, Rontalizumab, RYI 008 (Gerilimzumab), SAR228810, SAR3419 (Coltuximab ravtansine), SAR650984 (Isatuximab), SGN-CD19B, SGN-CD70A, Sym004 (Modotuximab), TAB-107 (Cedelizumab), TAB-262 (Teneliximab), TAB-H16 (Dapirolizumab pegol), TAK-573, TG-110 (Ublituximab), UCB4144, VX15/2503 (Pepinemab), xmab5574 (CD19), Xmab5871, Xoma 052, and (Gevokizumab), and Zanolimumab.

[0122] In certain embodiments, A of the fusion construct of Formula II is a monoclonal antibody for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD is a chronic neurodegenerative progressive disease that starts with an early onset in a small population with familial genetic causes and later in life for the larger population with no clear genetic basis. The most common symptom associated with this disease is episodic memory loss, progressing to severe cognitive decline. The underlying cause of AD is yet unknown. AD is characterized by the loss of neurons and synapses in the cerebral cortex and certain sub-cortical regions. There is strong genetic evidence that AD is a protein misfolding disorder that results in plaque and tangle deposition of abnormally folded amyloid beta (A) peptide and tau protein in the brain, the two classical hall-marks of the disease (Coate et al., 1991; Hardy and Mullan, 1992). Currently, there is no approved treatment for slowing or arresting disease progression. A seminal study, showed that active immunization against full-length A in combination with an adjuvant reduced amyloid plaque burden in an AD transgenic mouse model (Schenk et al., 1999). Subsequently, numerous studies have demonstrated the efficiency of active and passive A immunotherapy in preclinical AD mouse models. However, despite early optimism derived from these successful preclinical studies, this approach has not yet been developed into disease-modifying therapies in humans. For example, in 2012 two Phase III clinical trials of the anti A Mabs, bapineuzumab and solanezumab, failed to meet their primary clinical end points of improved cognition (Doody et al., 2014; Salloway et al., 2014). Importantly, bapineuzumab caused vascular side effects designated as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. This resulted in discontinuation of the high-dose group, which may explain the lack of clinical efficacy due to suboptimal brain exposure. In spite of these disappointing clinical results, other mAbs are currently being tested in AD prevention trials, where recent clinical trials have demonstrated that mAbs against the aggregated form of the A peptide produced a dose and time-dependent reduction of amyloid plaque in the brain and potentially also led to clinical benefit. The most promising clinical data have been observed in patients with early (prodromal) or mild AD, suggesting that early intervention is important although in practice it is extremely difficult to find patients at this stage of the disease.

[0123] There are several mAbs in human clinical trials with the aim of reaching therapeutic concentrations within the brain parenchyma space to establish clinical benefit with the greatest number being tested in AD.

[0124] In certain embodiments, A of the fusion construct of Formula II is selected from the group consisting of solanezumab, aducanumab, gantenerumab, BAN2401, LY3372993, SAR255952, Donanemab (aka N3pG) LY3202626, R07105705, BIIB076, C2N 8E12, LY3303560.

T of the Fusion Construct of Formula III

[0125] T of the invention encompasses chimeric, humanized and human antibodies that are specific for the C-terminus of TauC3 (anti-TauC3 antibodies). The anti-TauC3 antibodies have a binding affinity (KD) for TauC3 of from 110.sup.10 to 110.sup.12 and a binding affinity (KD) for full length tau (FLT) (SEQ ID NO:1) of from 110.sup.4 to 110.sup.8 M. For example, the anti-TauC3 antibodies may have a binding affinity (KD) for TauC3 of about 510.sup.12 M to about 1.210.sup.10 from about 110.sup.11 M to about 110.sup.10 M, from about 110.sup.11 M to about 910.sup.11 M, from about 110.sup.11 M to about 810.sup.11 M, from about 110.sup.11 M to about 710.sup.11 M, from about 110.sup.11 M to about 610.sup.11 M, from about 110.sup.11 M to about 510.sup.11 M, or from about 110.sup.11 M to about 410.sup.11 M; and a binding affinity (KD) for FLT of from 110.sup.4 to 110.sup.8 M. In the preferred embodiments, the antibody retains its binding capability after being subjected to a temperature from about 40 C. to about 67 C. for 10 minutes and also retains its binding capability after incubation in serum (e.g., mouse) at 37 C. for 21 days. The high binding capability of the anti-TauC3 antibodies allows the antibodies to target TauC3 without compromising normal physiological functions of FLT. In some embodiments, the specificity of the antibody allows to target only the most noxious species of tau, one may potentially reduce the effective therapeutic dose, as compared to an antibody which is not specific and does not discriminate between different species of tau. The anti-TauC3 antibodies, and their antigen binding fragments, could be used, e.g., in the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative disorders associated with pathological activities of TauC3 in the brain, including, e.g., Alzheimer disease (AD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), Pick's disease (PiD), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), etc. The anti-TauC3 antibody may have an aqueous solubility of 50 mg/ml or more (e.g., from about 50 mg/ml to about 200 mg/ml, from about 55 mg/ml to about 180 mg/ml, from about 55 mg/ml to about 170 mg/ml, from about 55 mg/ml to about 150 mg/ml, from about 55 mg/ml to about 140 mg/ml, from about 55 mg/ml to about 130 mg/ml; or from about 60 mg/ml to about 130 mg/ml.

[0126] In certain embodiments, T of the fusion construct of Formula III is TBL-100 or TauC3 antibody.

Tauopathies

[0127] Tau protein (2N4R) (SEQ ID NO: 1), often referred to as full-length tau (FLT), is a microtubule associated protein that distributes mainly to axons. Tau protein takes part in modulating the assembly, spatial organization and behavior of microtubules (MT) in neurons. FLT is preferentially cleaved by caspase-3, at residue 421 near the C-terminus of the protein, forming a truncated form of the protein known as TauC3.

[0128] TauC3 exists in low abundance compared to FLT (believed less than 1%) but was shown to exert a disproportionately large pathological effect, accounting, e.g., for the majority of tau propagation in AD brain, presumably by driving tau filament formation by nucleation. TauC3 is an extremely noxious protein. TauC3 is implicated in various tauopathies and neurodegenerative disorders, including, e.g., Alzheimer's disease (AD), Pick's disease (PiD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and the like. TauC3 may also be implicated, e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. An SNP (rs1768208 C/T) has been identified as a strong risk factor for PSP and shown to result in increased levels of the pro-apoptotic protein appoptosin in PSP patients. Elevations in appoptosin correlate with activated caspase-3 and tauC3 levels.

[0129] Fusion constructs which selectively bind TauC3 and exhibit no substantial binding to FLT (SEQ ID NO:1) may be used to treat various tauopathies, without compromising the physiological function of FLT.

[0130] Administration of a fusion construct of Formula III can be used, e.g., as a therapy to treat or immunize from tauopathies.

[0131] The fusion construct of Formula III may be administered to a human in a therapeutically effective amount to treat a tauopathy. Administration is performed using standard effective techniques, include peripherally (i.e. not by administration into the central nervous system) or locally to the central nervous system. Peripheral administration includes but is not limited to intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, pulmonary, transdermal, intramuscular, intranasal, buccal, sublingual, or suppository administration. Local administration, including directly into the central nervous system (CNS) includes, but is not limited to, via a lumbar, intraventricular or intraparenchymal catheter or using a surgically implanted controlled release formulation.

[0132] Humans amenable to treatment include individuals at risk of disease but not showing symptoms, as well as patients presently showing symptoms. In the case of Alzheimer's disease, virtually anyone is at risk of suffering from Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, the present methods can be administered prophylactically to the general population. Such prophylactic administration can begin at, e.g., age 50 or greater. The present methods are especially useful for individuals who do have a known genetic risk of a tauopathy (e.g., Alzheimer's disease). Such individuals include those having relatives who have experienced this disease and those whose risk is determined by analysis of genetic or biochemical markers. For example, genetic markers of risk toward Alzheimer's disease include mutations in the APP gene, particularly mutations, at position 717 and positions 670 and 671 referred to as the Hardy and Swedish mutations respectively. Other markers of risk are mutations in the presenilin genes, PS1 and PS2, and ApoE4, family history of AD, hypercholesterolemia or atherosclerosis. Individuals presently suffering from Alzheimer's disease can be recognized from characteristic dementia by the presence of risk factors described above. In addition, a number of diagnostic tests are available for identifying individuals who have AD. These include imaging, and/or measurement of CSF tau and A42 levels. Elevated tau and decreased A42 levels signify the presence of AD. Individuals suffering from Alzheimer's disease can also be diagnosed by Alzheimer's disease and Related Disorders Association criteria.

[0133] In asymptomatic patients, treatment can begin at any age (e.g., 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60). Usually, however, it is not necessary to begin treatment until a patient reaches 40, 50, 60, 70, 75 or 80. Treatment typically entails multiple dosages over a period of time. Treatment can be monitored by assaying antibody, or activated T-cell or B-cell responses to the therapeutic agent over time. If the response falls, a booster dosage is indicated. In the case of potential Down's syndrome patients, treatment can begin antenatally by administering therapeutic agent to the mother or shortly after birth.

[0134] In prophylactic applications, pharmaceutical compositions comprising an anti-tau antibody analogue according to the invention are administered to a patient susceptible to, or otherwise at risk of a tauopathy in an amount sufficient to eliminate or reduce the risk, lessen the severity, or delay the outset of the disease, including biochemical, histologic and/or behavioral symptoms of the disease, its complications and intermediate pathological phenotypes presented during development of the disease. In therapeutic applications, compositions comprising a fusion construct of Formula III are administered to a patient suspected of, or already suffering from, such a disease in an amount sufficient to cure, or at least partially arrest, the symptoms of the disease biochemical, histologic and/or behavioral), including its complications and intermediate pathological phenotypes in development of the disease. In some methods, administration of agent reduces or eliminates mild cognitive impairment. An amount adequate to accomplish therapeutic or prophylactic treatment is defined as a therapeutically- or prophylactically-effective dose or amount. In both prophylactic and therapeutic regimes, agents are usually administered in several dosages until a sufficient immune response has been achieved. Typically, the immune response is monitored and repeated dosages are given if the immune response starts to wane.

[0135] Effective doses of the fusion construct of Formula III, for the treatment of the above described conditions vary depending upon many different factors, including means of administration, target site, physiological state of the patient, other medications administered, and whether treatment is prophylactic or therapeutic. Treatment dosages need be tested on a case by case basis in clinical trials and often titrated to optimize safety and efficacy. An additional advantage of the fusion construct of Formula III of the present invention in certain embodiments may be that, for equal mass dosages, dosages of the fusion construct of Formula III contain a higher molar dosage of the antibodies effective in clearing and/or inactivating, than a composition comprising antibodies that are less specific for tauC3 than the fusion construct of Formula III. Typically, fusion construct of Formula III would be administered by intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection. The amount of the fusion construct of Formula III for administration by intravenous infusion may vary from 0.5 to 10 mg per patient. Subcutaneous injections generally require higher doses to reach the brain in sufficient quantity. The antibodies (e.g., whole IgG molecules) may be administered once a month.

[0136] Dosage and frequency vary depending on the half-life of the fusion construct of Formula III in the patient. In general, fusion constructs comprising humanized antibodies show the longest half-life, followed by fusion constructs comprising chimeric antibodies, and fusion constructs comprising nonhuman antibodies. The dosage and frequency of administration can vary depending on whether the treatment is prophylactic or therapeutic. In prophylactic applications, a relatively low dosage is administered at relatively infrequent intervals over a long period of time. Some patients continue to receive treatment for the rest of their lives. In therapeutic applications, a relatively high dosage at relatively short intervals is sometimes required until progression of the disease is reduced or terminated, and preferably until the patient shows partial or complete amelioration of symptoms of disease. Thereafter, the patent can be administered a prophylactic regime.

[0137] In some methods, dosage of the fusion construct is adjusted to achieve a plasma antibody concentration of 1-1000 g/ml and in some methods 25-300 g/ml. Alternatively, antibody can be administered as a sustained release formulation, in which case less frequent administration is required.

[0138] The dose of the fusion construct of Formula III to block tauC3 seeding is not necessarily the same as the dose of the fusion construct of Formula III to inhibit tauC3 aggregation. In view of the information provided in the present specification, one of ordinary skill in the art can determine the specific doses by routine experimentation.

[0139] The efficacy of the administration/treatment may be accessed by measuring levels of pathogenic tau or phospho tau in plasma and/or CSF. Based on this assessment, the dose and/or frequency of administration may be adjusted accordingly.

[0140] In certain embodiments, effect on cognition may also be accessed.

[0141] The efficacy may also be accessed by a degree of brain atrophy, as determined by MRI.

[0142] The safety of the administration/treatment may be accessed by number of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, MRI, and physical and neurological exams as well as worsening of cognition. Based on this assessment, the dose and/or frequency of administration may be adjusted accordingly.

[0143] The fusion construct of Formula III may be administered intranasally, by a subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, IV infusion, transcutaneously, buccally, etc., or as described in more detail below.

Methods of Blocking Propagation of Pathological Tau Aggregation

[0144] In an additional aspect, the invention is directed to a method of blocking spreading of pathological tau from one neuron to another or from one part of the brain to another.

[0145] In an additional aspect, the invention is directed to a method of blocking tauC3 seeding activity in the brain of a patient.

[0146] The invention is also directed to a method of reducing the spread of pathological tau aggregation in the brain of a patient.

[0147] The invention is further directed to a method of reducing the spread of aggregates comprising tauC3 in the brain of a patient.

[0148] The invention is further directed to a method of reducing the spread of fibrils comprising tauC3 in the brain of a patient.

[0149] In a further aspect the invention, the invention is directed to a method of reducing intracellular aggregation of tau induced by intracellular uptake of tauC3 and tauC3 fibrils.

[0150] In each aspect, the method comprises administering a therapeutically effective amount of a fusion construct of Formula III to a human. The fusion construct of Formula III is capable of uniquely recognizing an aggregated form of pathological tau without significantly affecting normal physiological functions of FLT. In an embodiment, an essential part of the epitope of the fusion construct of Formula III is the carboxy group forming a neoepitope at the C-terminus residue in a peptide corresponding to the last ten C-terminal residues of tauC3 (SEQ ID NO: 18 SSTGSIDMVD). The fusion construct of Formula III preferably has an equilibrium constant KD to tauC3 that is from about 2 to about 3 orders of magnitude higher than the antibodies equilibrium constant KD to FLT (SEQ ID NO:1). The fusion construct of Formula III binds tauC3 with equilibrium constant KD of from 110.sup.10 M to 110.sup.11 M, but have an equilibrium constant KD with FLT (SEQ ID NO:1) which is from 110.sup.4 M to 110.sup.8 M or show no detectible binding with FLT (SEQ ID NO:1). In the preferred embodiments, the fusion construct of Formula III binds tauC3 with an equilibrium constant KD of from 110.sup.11 M to 910.sup.11 M, and bind FLT (i.e., 2N4R) (SEQ ID NO:1) with an equilibrium constant KD of from 110.sup.8 M to 910.sup.8M or show no detectable binding with FLT (i.e., 2N4R) (SEQ ID NO:1). The fusion construct of Formula III preferably has a very slow off rate from tauC3 (i.e., an association constant (ka) of from 9,000,000 l/Ms to 14,000,000 l/MS) and substantially no affinity to 2N4R (i.e., ka of less than 100,000 l/MS). The antibodies may, e.g., be a humanized antibody, a chimeric antibody or an immunological fragment of any of the foregoing.

[0151] A human may or may not be having a symptom associated with tau aggregation prior to administration of a therapeutically effective amount of the fusion construct of Formula III. In other words, a human may or may not be experiencing a symptom associated with tau seeding and/or aggregation. One of the ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that pathological tau seeding and aggregation likely commences prior to diagnosis or the onset of symptoms associated with tau aggregation. In some embodiments, a human is having a symptom associated with tau seeding and/or aggregation. In other embodiments, a human is not having a symptom associated with tau seeding and/or aggregation. In still other embodiments, a human has detectable tau pathology but is not having any other symptom associated with tau symptoms and/or aggregation. Reducing the spread of tau aggregation in the brain of a human by administering the therapeutic agents and pharmaceutical compositions according to the invention may reduce the development and/or progression of symptoms associated with the pathological seeding and/or aggregation of tau.

[0152] Preventing, inhibiting or slowing down spreading of pathological tau aggregation may therefore be used in the treatment of pathologies associated with generation and spread of tau aggregates. Exemplary disorders that have symptoms associated with tau aggregation include, but are not limited to, progressive supranuclear palsy, dementia pugilistica (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, Lytico-Bodig disease (Parkinson-dementia complex of Guam), tangle-predominant dementia, ganglioglioma and gangliocytoma, meningioangiomatosis, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, lead encephalopathy, tuberous sclerosis, Hallervorden-Spatz disease, lipofuscinosis, Pick's disease, corticobasal degeneration, argyrophilic grain disease (AGD), Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer's Disease, and frontotemporal dementia. Methods for diagnosing these disorders are known in the art.

[0153] Exemplary symptoms associated with tau seeding or aggregation may include, e.g., impaired cognitive function, altered behavior, emotional dysregulation, seizures, and impaired nervous system structure or function. Impaired cognitive function includes but is not limited to difficulties with memory, attention, concentration, language, abstract thought, creativity, executive function, planning, and organization. Altered behavior includes but is not limited to physical or verbal aggression, impulsivity, decreased inhibition, apathy, decreased initiation, changes in personality, abuse of alcohol, tobacco or drugs, and other addiction-related behaviors. Emotional dysregulation includes but is not limited to depression, anxiety, mania, irritability, and emotional incontinence. Seizures include but are not limited to generalized tonic-clonic seizures, complex partial seizures, and non-epileptic, psychogenic seizures. Impaired nervous system structure or function includes but is not limited to hydrocephalus, Parkinsonism, sleep disorders, psychosis, impairment of balance and coordination. This includes motor impairments such as monoparesis, hemiparesis, tetraparesis, ataxia, ballismus and tremor. This also includes sensory loss or dysfunction including olfactory, tactile, gustatory, visual and auditory sensation. Furthermore, this includes autonomic nervous system impairments such as bowel and bladder dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, blood pressure and temperature dysregulation. Finally, this includes hormonal impairments attributable to dysfunction of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland such as deficiencies and dysregulation of growth hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, lutenizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone, prolactin, and numerous other hormones and modulators. Methods for detecting and evaluating symptoms associated with tau aggregation are known in the art.

[0154] In some embodiments, a symptom associated with tau aggregation refers to dementia. Dementia is not itself a specific disease, but is an overall term that describes a wide range of symptoms associated with a decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities. Dementia is also a shared clinical feature of many diseases associated with tau aggregation. A skilled practitioner will be familiar with the numerous methods available to diagnose the severity of dementia. For example, several cognitive tests and screening questionnaires for dementia are known in the art, all with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity. Non-limiting examples include the mini mental state examination (MMSE), the abbreviated mental test may score (AMTS), the modified mini mental state exam (3MS), the cognitive abilities screening instrument (CASI), the Trail-making test, the clock drawing test, the Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly, the General practitioner assessment of cognition, the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Eight-item informant interview to differentiate aging and dementia (AD8).

[0155] In some embodiments, the severity of the symptoms of dementia is quantified using the Clinical Dementia Rating. Using the Clinical Dementia Rating, a score of 0 indicates no symptoms, a score of 0.5 indicates very mild symptoms, a score of 1 indicates mild symptoms, a score of 2 indicates moderate symptoms and a score of 3 indicates severe symptoms. Thus, any increase in a Clinical Dementia Rating score for a human indicates a worsening in cognition and an increase in dementia. Moreover, change in Clinical Dementia Rating from 0 to greater than 0, indicates the development or onset of dementia.

[0156] In some embodiments, a symptom associated with tau seeding or aggregation refers to tau pathology or a tauopathy. The term tau pathology or tauopathy refers to the pathological seeding or aggregation of tau. In some embodiments, tau pathology refers to neurofibrially tangles. In other embodiments, tau pathology refers to hyperphosphorylated tau. In still other embodiments, tau pathology refers to a high level of tau aggregates detectable in blood, plasma, serum, CSF, or ISF, anywhere from 2 to approximately 40-fold higher than that detected in individuals without disease.

Pharmaceutical Compositions

[0157] Pharmaceutical compositions in accordance with the invention comprise the fusion construct of Formula I, II or III, and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.

[0158] The fusion construct of Formula III binds tauC3 with equilibrium constant KD of from 110.sup.10 M to 110.sup.11 M, but have an equilibrium constant KD with FLT (SEQ ID NO:1) which is from 110.sup.4 M to 110.sup.8 M or show no detectible binding with FLT (SEQ ID NO:1). In the preferred embodiments, the fusion construct of Formula III binds tauC3 with an equilibrium constant KD of from 110.sup.11 M to 910.sup.11 M, and binds FLT (SEQ ID NO:1) with an equilibrium constant KD of from 110.sup.8 M to 910 M or show no detectable binding with FLT (SEQ ID NO:1). The fusion construct of Formula III preferably has a very slow off rate from tauC3 (i.e., an association constant (ka) of from 9,000,000 l/Ms to 14,000,000 l/MS) and substantially no affinity to FLT (SEQ ID NO:1) (i.e., ka of less than 100,000 l/MS). A of the fusion construct of Formula III may, e.g., comprise a humanized antibody, a chimeric antibody or a human antibody (e.g., from tg mice).

[0159] The pharmaceutical compositions are designed to be appropriate for the selected mode of administration, and pharmaceutically acceptable excipients such as compatible dispersing agents, buffers, surfactants, preservatives, solubilizing agents, isotonicity agents, stabilizing agents and the like are used as appropriate.

[0160] Effective peripheral systemic delivery by intravenous or subcutaneous injection is a preferred method of administration to a living patient. Suitable vehicles for such injections are straightforward.

[0161] The concentration of the fusion construct of Formula I, II or III in formulations to be administered is an effective amount and ranges from as low as about 0.1% by weight to as much as about 95% or about 99.9% by weight and will be selected primarily based on fluid volumes, viscosities, and so forth, in accordance with the particular mode of administration selected if desired. In certain embodiments, the fusion construct of Formula I, II or III may comprise from about 15 or about 20% by weight of the composition.

[0162] A composition for injection to a patient could be made up to contain from 1-250 ml sterile buffered water of phosphate buffered saline and about 1-5000 mg of any one of or a combination of the fusion construct of Formula I, II or III. The formulation could be sterile filtered after making the formulation, or otherwise made microbiologically acceptable. A typical composition for intravenous infusion could have volumes between 1-250 ml of fluid, such as sterile Ringer's solution, and 1-100 mg per ml, or more in anti-tau antibody analogue concentration. Therapeutic agents of the discovery can be frozen or lyophilized for storage and reconstituted in a suitable sterile carrier prior to use. Lyophilization and reconstitution may lead to varying degrees of antibody activity loss (e.g. with conventional immune globulins, IgM antibodies tend to have greater activity loss than IgG antibodies).

[0163] Dosages administered are effective amounts for the purposes indicated and may have to be adjusted to compensate. The pH of the formulations that are generally of pharmaceutical grade quality will be selected to balance antibody stability (chemical and physical) and comfort to the patient when administered. Generally, a pH between 4 and 8 is tolerated. Doses will vary from individual to individual based on size, weight, and other physiobiological characteristics of the individual receiving the successful administration.

[0164] In an aspect, a typical dose contains from about 0.1 mg to about 10 mg fusion construct of Formula I, II or III. In certain embodiments, the dose is from about 0.5 mg to about 10 mg. Doses can range from about 0.55 mg/kg to about 10 mg/kg. The frequency of dosing with whole IgG antibodies is usually per month whereas antibody fragments need to be dosed more often in view of their shorter half-life, as needed as to effectively treat the symptoms.

[0165] The timing of administration of the treatment relative to the disease itself and duration of treatment will be determined by the circumstances surrounding the case. Treatment could begin after diagnosis of a disease associated with tau aggregation. Alternatively, treatment could begin after clinical confirmation of a symptom associated with tau aggregation. Further still, treatment could begin after detection of tau pathology. Treatment could begin immediately in a hospital or clinic, or at a later time after discharge from the hospital or after being seen in an outpatient clinic. Duration of treatment could range from a single dose administered on a one-time basis to a life-long course of therapeutic treatments.

[0166] Although the foregoing methods appear the most convenient and most appropriate and effective for administration of proteins such as humanized antibodies, by suitable adaptation, other effective techniques for administration, such as intraventricular administration, transdermal administration and oral administration may be employed provided proper formulation is utilized herein.

[0167] Typical effective amounts or doses can be determined and optimized using standard clinical techniques and will be dependent on the mode of administration in view of the information provided herein and knowledge available in the art.

Example 1 (TBL-110)

[0168] A fusion construct was prepared. The heavy and light chain sequences of the fusion construct were as follows:

TABLE-US-00007 Fulllengthheavychain: [00001] [00002] Heavychainsequence:480aa (SEQIDNO:19) [00003] DNAsequence:1467bp (SEQIDNO:20) [00004] GAAGTGCAGGTCGTGGAATCTGGCGGAGGACTGGTTCAGCCTAAGGGCAGCC TGAAGCTGTCTTGTGCCGCCAGCGGCTTCACCTTCAACACCTACGCCATGAAC TGGGTCCGACAGGCCCCTGGCAAAGGCCTTGAATGGGTCGCCAGAATCAGAA GCAAGAGCAACAATTACGCCACCTACTACGCCGACAGCGTGAAGGACAGATT CACCATCAGCCGGGACGACAGCCAGAGCATGGTGTACCTGCAGATGAACAAC CTGAAAACCGAGGACACCGCCATGTACTACTGTGTCGGCGGAGGCGATTTTTG GGGCCAGGGAACAGCTCTGACAGTGTCCAGC- [00005] [00006] FullLengthlightchain: [00007] Lightchainsequence:233aa (SEQIDNO:21) [00008] DNAsequence:726bp (SEQIDNO:22) [00009] GATATCCAGATGACACAGAGCCCCAGCAGCCTGTCTGCCTCTCTGGGAGAAAGAGTGTCCCTGACC TGCAGAGCCAGCCAAGAGATCAGCGTGTACCTGAGCTGGTTCCAGCAGAAGCCTGACGGCACCAT CAAGCGGCTGATCTACGGCGCCTTCACACTGGATAGCGGCGTGCCCAAGAGATTCTCCGGCAGCAG ATCTGGCAGCGACTACAGCCTGACAATCAGCTCCCTGGAAAGCGAGGACTTCGCCGACTACTACTG CCTGCAGTACGTGCGCTACCCCTGGACATTTGGCGGCGGAACAAAGCTGGAAATCAAG- [00010]

[0169] SDS-Page and Western blot analysis of the resulting construct in presented in FIGS. 1A and 1B, respectively. Lane M1: Protein Marker, TaKaRa, Cat. No. 3452. Lane M2: Protein Marker, GenScript, Cat. No. M00521. Lane 1: Reducing condition. Lane 2: Non-reducing condition.

[0170] The following general procedures were used:

[0171] Plasmid Preparation:

1) Target DNA sequence was designed, optimized and synthesized;
2) The complete sequence was sub-cloned into pcDNA3.4vector;
3) Transfection grade plasmid was maxi-prepared for Expi293F cell expression.

[0172] Cell Culture and Transient Transfection:

1) Expi293FTMcells were grown in serum-free Expi293TMExpression Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
2) The cells were maintained in Erlenmeyer Flasks (Corning Inc.) at 37 C. with 8% CO2on an orbital shaker (VWR Scientific).
3) One day before transfection, the cells were seeded at an appropriate density in Corning Erlenmeyer Flasks.
4) On the day of transfection, DNA and ExpiFectamine293 Reagent were mixed at an optimal ratio and then added into the flask with cells ready for transfection.
5) The recombinant plasmids encoding target antibody were transiently co-transfected into suspensionExpi293Fcell cultures. Approximately 16-18 hours post-transfection, ExpiFectamine 293 Transfection Enhancer 1 and ExpiFectamine 293 Transfection Enhancer 2 were added to each flask. The cell culture supernatants collected and ay 6 were used for purification.

[0173] Purification and Analysis:

1) Cell culture broth was centrifuged and followed by filtration.
2) Filtered cell culture supernatant was loaded onto an affinity purification column at an appropriate flowrate.
3) After washing and elution with appropriate buffers, the eluted fractions were pooled and buffer exchanged to the final formulation buffer.
4) The purified protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, Western blotanalysis to determine the molecular weight and purity.
5) The concentration was determined by A280 method.

[0174] Anti-tauC3 antibody's ability to prevent tauC3-induced changes in mitochondrial morphology as an index of neurotoxicity is tested using cultured neurons transfected with tauC3 plasmid or by exposing the cells to apoptotic insults to induce caspase 3 cleavage of FLT (SEQ ID NO:1).

[0175] Immunohistochemistry is used to identify antitauC3 antibody-tauC3 complexes and explore their subcellular localization in cultured neurons and brain slices by high resolution fluorescence microscopy.

Example 2

[0176] Internalization and retention of murine antiTauC3 antibody (TBL-100) and fusion construct of Example 1 were compared.

[0177] Rate of internalization and retention of the fusion construct of Example 1 appeared to be greater than of the murine antiTauC3 antibody.

[0178] Co-localization of the fusion construct with lysosomal markers as well as increased retention of the test article following treatment with bafilomycin suggests that internalized murine anti-TauC3 antibody may be more efficiently cleared via lysosomal activity than the fusion construct of Example 1.

Project Methodology Summary

[0179] Cells

[0180] Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HBMVEC) (iXCells) are plated at 1500 cells per well of a 384 well plate and cultured for 24 hours prior to treatment with each of murine antiTauC3 antibody and fusion construct of Example 1 (test articles) in both the presence and absence of Bafilomycin.

[0181] Treatment

[0182] Murine Anti-TauC3 antibody and fusion construct test antibodies are tested in 3-point dose-response1:500, 1:100, 1:20for 3, 6 and 24 hour treatment exposures. Parallel wells on the same plate are also treated with either 0.1% DMSO or 100 nM Bafilomycin to measure effects of lysosomal activity following test article internalization. Following the appropriate time-course for each of the three time points, cells are fixed and permeabilized in a PFA solution and blocked overnight in goat block buffer.

[0183] Analysis

[0184] Automated quantitative analysis of neurite outgrowth as well as standard metrics associated with neuronal health using the Thermo CX7 HCS. Instrumentation and analysis suite. A minimum of 4 replicate wells per condition with 9 fields acquired per well using a 20 objective.

Project Methodology Detail.

[0185] 1. Dissociate HBMVEC cells (IXCells) and count using Countess II cell counter.

[0186] 2. Prepare mixture of 14 ml complete media and 1.05106 cells.

[0187] 3. Enough for 700 wells of low volume 384 well plate (20 ul/1500 cells per well).

[0188] 4. Array cells into each of three plates (3, 6, 24 hour test article treatment).

[0189] 5. Return plated cells to 37 degree incubator for 24 hours.

[0190] 6. Following 24 hour pre-culture, prepare dilutions of TBL-100 and TBL-110 (1:500, 1:100, 1:20) in 8 ml of complete media. [0191] Excess volume enables liquid handling instrumentation to perform complete media change.

[0192] 6. Divide each dilution into two equal volumes.

[0193] 7. To one, add Bafilomycin stock to yield a final concentration of 100 nM.

[0194] 8. Use Apricot liquid handling platform to carry out complete media change.

[0195] 9. Return plates to incubator for 3, 6 and 24 hours.

[0196] 10. At the conclusion of each time point incubation, fix for 20 minutes using 4% PFA solution in PBS, wash with PBS, and permeabilize cells.

[0197] 11. Block overnight in goat block buffer.

[0198] 12. To each well of all three plates, add the following mixture of primary antibodies is added: [0199] Transferrin Receptor antibody (1:400 rabbit primary) [Cell Signaling Technology13208S] [0200] LAMP2 antibody (1:200 rat primary) [Abcamab13524]

[0201] 13. Return plates to 4 degree fridge overnight

[0202] 14. Wash plates 4 each with PBS using Apricot before adding the following mixture of secondary antibodies and labels for 1 hour at room temperature: [0203] Hoechst (1:1000 occupying 386 channel for detection of nuclei) [0204] Goat anti-mouse (1:1000 occupying 488 channel for detection of TBL100/110) [0205] Goat anti-rabbit (1:1000 occupying 560 channel for detection of Transferrin R) [0206] Goat anti-rat (1:1000 occupying 650 channel for detection of LAMP2)

[0207] 15. Remove secondary antibody mixture using Apricot and fill wells with PBS containing antibiotic/antimycotic and sodium-azide

[0208] 16. Seal plates and image using Thermo Scientific CellInsight CX7 instrument and a 20 objective

[0209] Increased retention of TBL-100 (murine antiTauC3 antibody) following Bafilomycin treatment suggests that in untreated cells it is readily cleared by the lysosome.

[0210] Both test articles show higher levels of colocalization with the lysosomal marker LAMP2 than with Transferrin Receptor (TR) at later time points but TBL-100 (murine antiTauC3 antibody) more readily colocalizes with both at early time points suggesting rapid uptake by TR and subsequent clearance by the lysosome.

[0211] High levels of intracellular TBL-110 (fusion construct of Example 1), which is not colocalized with either LAMP2 or TR, suggests that this test article is released upon internalization or is taken up by an alternative mechanism.

Example 3

[0212] The findings of Example 2 were confirmed in Human, Monkey and Brain Microvascular Cells (HBMVEC).

Project Methodology Summary

[0213] Cells

[0214] Human, Monkey or Mouse Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells (BMVEC) from Creative Bioarray were plated at 1500 cells per well of a 384 well plate and cultured for 24 hours prior to treatment with each of murine antiTauC3 antibody and fusion construct of Example 1 in both the presence and absence of 100 nM Bafilomycin.

[0215] Treatment

[0216] Murine antiTauC3 antibody(TBL-100) and fusion construct of Example 1(TBL-110) (collectively test articles) were tested in. 3-point dose-response1:500, 1:100, 1:20for 24 hour treatment exposures. Parallel wells on the same plate were also treated with either 0.1% DMSO or 100 nM Bafilomycin to measure effects of lysosomal activity following test article internalization. Following the appropriate time-course for each of the three time points, cells were fixed and permeabilized in a PFA solution and blocked in goat block buffer.

[0217] Analysis

[0218] Automated quantitative analysis of standard metrics was performed using the Thermo CX7 HCS instrumentation and analysis suite. A minimum of 8 replicate wells per condition with 16 fields acquired per well using a 40 objective.

Project Methodology Detail

[0219] 1. Dissociate BMVEC cells and count using Countess II cell counter.

[0220] 2. Array cells into plates for 24 hour test article treatment.

[0221] 3. Return plated wells to 37 degree incubator for 24 hours.

[0222] 4. Following 24 hour pre-culture, prepare dilutions of Murine antiTauC3 antibody and fusion construct of Example 1 (1:500, 1:100, 1:20) in 8 ml of complete media. [0223] Excess volume enables liquid handling instrumentation to perform complete media change

[0224] 5. Divide each dilution into two equal volumes.

[0225] 6. To one, add Bafflomycin stock to yield a final concentration of 100 nM.

[0226] 7. Use Apricot liquid handling platform to carry out complete media change.

[0227] 8. Return plates to incubator for 24 hours.

[0228] 9. At the conclusion of each time point incubation, fix for 20 minutes using 4% PFA solution in PBS, wash with PBS, and permeabilize cells.

[0229] 10. Block 1 hour at room temperature in goat block buffer.

[0230] 11. To each well of all three plates, add the following mixture of primary antibodies is added: [0231] Transferrin Receptor antibody (1:200 rabbit primary) [Cell Signaling Technology13208S] [0232] LAMP2 antibody (1:200 rat primary) [Abcamab13524]

[0233] 12. Return plates to 4 degree fridge overnight.

[0234] 13. Wash plates 5 each with PBS using Apricot before adding the following mixture of secondary antibodies and labels for 1 hour at room temperature: [0235] Hoechst (1:1000 occupying 386 channel for detection of nuclei) [0236] Goat anti-mouse (1:1000 occupying 488 channel for detection Of Murine antiTauC3 antibody/fusion construct of Example 1) [0237] Goat anti-rabbit (1:1000 occupying 560 channel for detection of Transferrin R) [0238] Goat anti-rat (1:1000 occupying 650 channel for detection of LAMP2)

[0239] 14. Remove secondary antibody mixture using Apricot and fill wells with PBS containing antibiotic/antimycotic and sodium-azide.

[0240] 15. Seal plates and image using Thermo Scientific CellInsight CX7 instrument and a 40 objective.

[0241] Results Summary

[0242] 1. Rate of internalization and retention of fusion construct of Example 1 (TBL-110) appears to be greater than of the murine antiTauC3 antibody (TBL-100) in Human, Monkey and Mouse BMVEC lines.

[0243] 2. Increased retention of fusion construct of Example 1 compared to the murine antiTauC3 antibody was greatest in the absence of Bafilomycin (i.e. in the presence of Bafilomycin, and at the highest test concentrations, both the murine antiTauC3 antibody and fusion construct of Example 1 had similar high levels of retention).

[0244] 3. The addition of Bafilomycin preferentially increased retention of the murine antiTauC3 antibody rather than fusion construct of Example 1 for Human and Monkey BMVEC, cell lines.

[0245] 4. Transferrin-R and LAMP2 expression levels were not significantly affected by increasing doses of either test article.

[0246] 5. Both murine antiTauC3 antibody and fusion construct of Example 1 showed partial colocalization with Transferrin Receptor as well as LAMP2.

[0247] Thus, the construct of Example 1 (TBL-110) shows cross species reactivity and works in human, monkey and mouse cell lines. This findings allow for, e.g., for preclinical pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and toxicology studies of the fusion constructs in animals and possible extrapolation of data generated in studies in animal models to humans.

Example 4

[0248] A taut 3 overexpressing AAV mouse model was injected intraperitoneally (IP) weekly for 6 months with IgG1 or anti-TauC3 IgG1 (TBL-110) mAb fused to Tfr binding peptide at the C-terminus of the heavy chains. Brain sections were analyzed by immunohistochemistry to determine the relative brain uptake of two different concentrations of control IgG or TBL-100. Images of the antibody stained brain sections were quantitatively analyzed and compared for statistical significance. The images are replicated in FIGS. 29A-29E, and the results of the quantitative analysis brain analysis are provided in Table 1 and are depicted in FIG. 30. The results confirmed significant brain uptake of TBL-110, the fusion construct of Example 1, as compared to control IgG, and that the uptake was dose dependent with the highest uptake occurring at the higher dose. The results are

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 1 95.00% Confidence Tukey' s Multiple Mean Interval of Comparison Test Difference Difference Significance Saline vs IgG 5 mg.kg 0.736 13.91 to 12.43 ns Saline vs TBL-110 5 mg/kg 14.67 28.64 to 0.70 Yes (*) Saline vs IgG 15 mg/kg 2.10 14.30 to 10.09 ns Saline vs TBL-110 15 mg/kg 14.06 28.03 to 0.08 Yes (*) IgG 5 mg/kg vs 13.94 27.91 to 0.03 ns TBL-110 5 mg.kg IgG 5 mg/kg vs 1.36 13.55 to 10.83 ns TBL110 15 mg/kg IgG 5 mg.kg vs 13.32 27.29 to 0.64 ns TBL-110 15 mg/kg TBL-110 5 mg/kg vs 12.57 0.48 to 25.62 ns IgG 15 mg/kg TBL-110 5 mg/kg vs 0.61 14.11 to 15.34 ns TBL-110 15 mg/kg IgG 15 mg/kg vs 11.97 25.01 to 1.09 ns TBL-110 15 mg/kg

[0249] In the preceding specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments and examples thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative manner rather than a restrictive sense.