Method for obtaining calcium aluminates from non-saline aluminum slags

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for obtaining calcium aluminates for metallurgical use from non-saline aluminum slags by means of reactive grinding and thermal treatment.

Claims

1. A method for obtaining a mixture of the following calcium aluminates suitable for the manufacturing of steel: CaAl.sub.2O.sub.4(CA), CaAl.sub.4O.sub.7(CA.sub.2), Ca.sub.12Al.sub.14O.sub.33 (C.sub.12A.sub.7), Ca.sub.3AlO.sub.6 (C.sub.3A) and CaAl.sub.12O.sub.19 (CA.sub.6), where CCaO and A=Al.sub.2O.sub.3, from a non-saline aluminum slag comprising the following steps: a) carrying out a reactive grinding of the non-saline aluminum slag from recovery by melting aluminum scrap metal or products of secondary melting of aluminum in the presence of calcium carbonate CaCO.sub.3, wherein the non-saline aluminum slag is generated from scrap metal and the reactive grinding of the non-saline aluminum slag with CaCO.sub.3 is carried out at a molar ratio of 1:3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO; b) thermally treating the product obtained in step a) at a temperature between 700 C. and 750 C. for one hour; and c) thermally treating the product obtained in step b) at a temperature between 1300 C. and 1400 C.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the non-saline aluminum slag of step a) has a percentage of hydrated aluminum oxides between 5% and 65%.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the grinding of step a) is carried out by means of a ball mill.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the product obtained in step a) has an average particle size of less than 40 m.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the content of the mixture of the following calcium aluminate CaAl.sub.2O.sub.4 (CA), CaAl.sub.4O.sub.7 (CA.sub.2), Ca.sub.12Al.sub.14O.sub.33 (C.sub.12A.sub.7), Ca.sub.3AlO.sub.6 (C.sub.3A) and CaAl.sub.12O.sub.19 (CA.sub.6), where CCaO and A=Al.sub.2O.sub.3, of step c) is comprised between 70% and 92%.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein between 71% and 85% of the calcium aluminates produced by the method are tricalcium aluminate Ca.sub.3AlO.sub.6 (C.sub.3A).

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1. Basic flowchart of obtaining calcium aluminate.

(2) FIG. 2. X-ray diffraction graphs of the slags; (a) Al-1, (b) Al-2, (c) Al-3 and (d) EM.

(3) FIG. 3. Rietveld method curves for the slags; (a) Al-1, (b) Al-2, (c) Al-3 and (d) EM

(4) FIG. 4. (a, b) Secondary electron image of slag Al-1.

(5) FIG. 5. (a, b) Secondary electron image of slag Al-2.

(6) FIG. 6. (a, b) Secondary electron image of slag Al-3.

(7) FIG. 7. X-ray diffraction graphs of the products sintered at 1300 C. obtained from the different slags studied (a) Al-1S; (b) Al-2S and (c) Al-3S (reactive grinding 1 h. Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio:=1:1).

(8) FIG. 8. Variation of the crystalline phase content based on the reactive grinding time, after sintering at 1300 C., for the slags used. a) Al-1S; b) Al-2S and c) Al-3S.

(9) FIG. 9. SEM images (secondary electron) of the sintering products obtained at 1300 C. for a Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:1. a) AI-2S; b)AI-2S and c) AI-3S (S=magnesium silicon aluminate, CA=calcium aluminate, M=mayenite or C.sub.12A.sub.7 and E=spinel; Ge=gehlenite).

(10) TABLE-US-00001 Symbols Indication in phase Sample/Crystalline phase diagrams Slag Al-1 1 Slag Al-2 2 Slag Al-3 3 Sintering of slag Al-1 1S (Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO ratio 1:1) Sintering of slag Al-2 2S (Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO ratio 1:1) Sintering of slag Al-3 3S (Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO ratio 1:1) Magnesium silicon aluminate SA Calcium monoaluminate (CA) CA Mayenite (C.sub.12A.sub.7) M MgFe Spinel Efe Melanite Me Calcium trialuminate C.sub.3A Mg Spinel E Grossite (CA.sub.2) G Gehlenite Ge Hibonite 5H H Bredigite B Wollastonite W Vesuvianite V

(11) FIG. 10. Phase diagrams of the AI.sub.2O.sub.3-SiO.sub.2-CaO system (A) where the initial slags and sintering products obtained are shown with AI.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratios of 1:1; 1:2 and 1:3 and of the AI.sub.2O.sub.3-MgO-CaO system (B).

(12) FIG. 11. Phase diagrams of the Al.sub.2O.sub.3SiO.sub.2CaO system where the initial slags and sintering products obtained are shown with Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratios of 1:1; 1:2 and 1:3.

(13) TABLE-US-00002 Symbols Indication in the diagram Slag Al 1 1 Slag Al 2 2 Slag Al 3 3 Sintering obtained from Al 1 slag for a 1S Al.sub.2O.sub.3 molar ratio of 1:1 Sintering obtained from Al 2 slag for a 2S Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:1 Sintering obtained from Al 3 slag for a 3S Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:1 Sintering obtained from Al 1 slag for a 1S2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:2 Sintering obtained from Al 2 slag for a 2S2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:2 Sintering obtained from Al 3 slag for a 3S2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:2 Sintering obtained from Al 1 slag for a 1S3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:3 Sintering obtained from Al 2 slag for a 2S3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:3 Sintering obtained from Al 3 slag for a 3S3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:3 Average Slag EM Sintering obtained from average slag for a S2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:2 Sintering obtained starting from average slag S3 for a Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio of 1:3

(14) FIG. 12. SEM image (backscattered electrons) of the sintering products obtained at 1300 C. and molar ratio of 1:3. (a) Al-1 3S; (b) Al-2 3S and (c) Al-3 3S (C.sub.3A=calcium trialuminate, M=mayenite or C.sub.12A.sub.7, MgMgO, PAl.sub.1.95Fe.sub.0.49Mg.sub.2.65O.sub.12Si.sub.2.91, Gr=Ca.sub.3Al.sub.2(SiO.sub.4).sub.3, KCa.sub.6(SiO.sub.4)(Si.sub.3O.sub.10), and HeFeAl.sub.2O.sub.4.

(15) FIG. 13. Images obtained in a hot stage microscope in which a sintering sample obtained from the average slag (EM), at 1300 C. and with a Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO ratio is heated at 10 C./min from room temperature to 1350 C.

EXAMPLES

(16) The invention is illustrated below by means of tests carried out by the inventors which reveal the effectiveness of the product of the invention.

(17) Four non-saline aluminum slag samples were worked on, identified as Al-1; Al-2; Al-3 and EM. Samples Al-1; AL-2 and Al-3 are slags produced in the fusion plant that are differentiated from each other by the time that they have been stored outdoors. The EM sample is a mixture of the three previously described slags. The mixture was made up of 30% by weight of slag Al-1; 20% of slag Al-2 and 50% of slag Al-3. The percentages by weight of each of the slags were chosen with effectiveness criteria.

(18) Sample Al-1: aluminum slag with an age of 3 to 7 years.

(19) Sample Al-2: aluminum slag with an age of 7 to 10 years, stored outdoors.

(20) Sample Al-3: recent aluminum slag, created between 2013-2014.

(21) Sample EM: aluminum slag, mixture of slags Al-1, Al-2 and Al-3 (30-20-50)

(22) Analysis of the Chemical Composition of the Aluminum Slag Samples.

(23) The aluminum slags received are quartered and dried in a stove (80 C./24 h), the moisture of each sample being determined. Subsequently, the samples are ground in a TEMA mill for 15 minutes until matter with a particle size smaller than 40 m is obtained.

(24) The samples are bombarded with lithium metaborate at 1050 C. and acidified with concentrated nitric acid (HNO.sub.3) in order to determine the chemical composition thereof by means of Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectroscopy, using for this purpose a spectrophotometer with ICP-OES optical emission, Varian 725-ES model.

(25) Likewise, the losses from calcination were determined according to ISO standard 1171:2010. (815 C./1 h).

(26) Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the slags.

(27) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1 Chemical composition of the slags (% by weight expressed as oxides). Al-1 Al-2 Al-3 EM Al.sub.2O.sub.3 75.67 58.42 81.94 75.35 CaO 4.54 4.59 4.718 4.64 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 3.70 4.55 1.84 2.94 MgO 3.17 1.96 3.35 3.02 SiO.sub.2 2.99 5.24 4.58 4.24 MnO.sub.2 0.10 0.25 0.20 0.27 CuO 0.14 0.40 0.10 0.17 ZnO 0.04 2.51 0.05 0.54 NiO 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 LxC 7.38 17.39 3.25 7.32 Moisture 2.43 11.67 0 0 (*LxC = Losses from calcination)

(28) Slags Al-1 and Al-3 have similar chemical compositions, while slag Al-2 has a lower Al content and a higher Zn percentage. The losses from calcination, which include moisture, water interstitially absorbed, water from crystallization of mineralogical phases and decomposition of mineralogical phases, have values that are very different to each other.

(29) Analysis of the Mineralogical Composition of the Aluminum Slag Samples.

(30) The mineralogical composition of the aluminum slag samples was obtained by means of x-ray diffraction, using for this purpose a Siemens D5000 diffractometer, equipped with a Cu anode (Cu K.sub. radiation) and LiF monochromator for eliminating the K.sub. radiation from the samples that contain iron. The voltage and current of the generator were 40 kV and 30 mA respectively. The measurement was performed continuously with steps of 0.03 and time of 3 s for each step. The interpretation of the diffractograms was carried out with assistance of the Powder Diffraction File (PDF-2) reference database from the ICDD (International Center for Diffraction Data) and the DIFFRACplus EVA software package offered by Bruker AXS.

(31) FIG. 2 contains the diffraction graphs of the slags studied. It is seen that the oldest slags (Al-1 and Al-2) (FIGS. 2a and 2b) have a greater amorphous character than the more recent slag (Al-3) (FIG. 2c), which clearly has a higher degree of crystallinity. FIG. 2(d) shows the diffraction graph of the EM sample where it is seen that said sample has a certain amorphous halo, which indicates that it is not a sample with high crystallinity.

(32) It is shown that samples Al-1 and Al-3 have a similar mineralogical composition. In slag Al-2, boehmite and gibbsite appear, which do not appear in the other two slags and at the same time, phases such as nordstrandite, enstatite and magnesite and the Mg spinel are not present in this slag. Sample Al-2 is more hydrated than the other two, possibly due to having been stored outdoors for years.

(33) The quantitative study of the crystalline phases present in the slag samples was performed by means of the Rietveld method, based on the X-ray diffraction diagrams (DRX) (FIG. 3).

(34) The quantification of the phases was performed using the TOPAS Rietveld (Bruker AXS) analysis program for refining DRX data. Once the fit is made, and the quality and reliability thereof ensured, the % of each phase was calculated from the residual values, R (Figures of Merit, FOM), considering that residual values less than 10% guarantee the goodness-of-fit and the reliability of the determination. Table 2 includes the quantitative mineralogical composition of the slags studied.

(35) Slag Al-2, the oldest one, has greater differences regarding the mineralogical composition thereof, it being seen that it has a lower metal aluminum (Al) and aluminum nitride (AlN) content and in contrast, it has an elevated hydrated aluminum oxide, gibbsite (-Al(OH).sub.3) and boehmite (AlO(OH)) content, which represents 50.41% of the total.

(36) The hydrated phases of the aluminum may have been formed as a consequence of the hydration of the aluminum metal and the aluminum nitride, according to reactions (3) to (5):
2Al+6H.sub.2O.fwdarw.2Al(OH).sub.3+3H.sub.2(3)
2Al+4H.sub.2O.fwdarw.2AlO(OH)+3H.sub.2(4)
AlN+3H.sub.2O.fwdarw.NH.sub.3+Al(OH).sub.3(5)

(37) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 2 Quantitative mineralogical composition of the slags studied, expressed in %. Crystalline phase Al-1 Al-2 Al-3 EM Al.sub.1.99Fe.sub.0.11Mg.sub.0.9O.sub.4 23.30 13.57 24.16 6.71 AlN 13.91 3.07 12.89 11.38 -Al.sub.2O.sub.3 8.34 6.21 12.00 13.16 Al 11.36 3.82 14.40 18.57 Al.sub.2.4Mg.sub.0.4O.sub.4 23.30 15.82 37.2 -Al(OH).sub.3 5.91 3.44 2.13 Al(OH).sub.3 1.82 0.89 Ca(OH).sub.2 1.40 2.24 2.91 1.72 CaCO.sub.3 8.66 10.28 6.37 6.35 SiO.sub.2 0.78 1.04 0.41 0.97 MgSiO.sub.3 0.75 4.46 0.05 MgCO.sub.3 0.56 0.33 -AlO(OH) 50.41 -Al(OH).sub.3 5.91 Ca.sub.14Mg.sub.2(SiO.sub.4).sub.8 3.57 3.44

(38) The total content in Al and Ca hydrates varies in the order: Al-2 (62%)>Al-1 (9.13%)>Al-3 (5.95%)>EM (1.72%)
which is the same order in which the losses from calcination vary.
Microstructural Analysis of the Aluminum Slag Samples.

(39) The microstructural analysis is carried out by Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) in a HITACHI S-4800, using a voltage of 15 kV. The samples for microscopy are put into a polymer resin and polished with 600, 1200 and 2000 grain sandpaper (adding carnauba to these in order to protect the sample). Subsequently, they were polished with 3 and 1 m diamond paste and were metallized with carbon in a JEOL JEE 4B.

(40) The morphological study is summarized in FIGS. 4 to 6. FIG. 4 (a, b), corresponding to slag Al-1, shows a morphology that is heterogeneous in size and appearance. The presence of released grains in which the aluminum combines with the oxygen (alumina) and with MgFe (spinels). Particles also appear in which the major element is aluminum, without association to the oxygen (aluminum metal).

(41) In FIG. 5 (a, b) the morphology of slag Al-2 is shown which has a surface with an appearance that is heterogeneous in grain size and appearance. The aluminum appears associated to iron and magnesium (spinel), calcium (in mixed alumina-calcite and/or portlandite grains) and silicon (in mixed alumina-silica grains) (a,c). The presence of metal aluminum is not observed.

(42) FIG. 6 (a, b) corresponding to slag Al-3. It has a surface with an appearance that is heterogeneous in grain size and appearance. Morphologically, the slag is similar to slag Al-1.

(43) Below, the method outlined in FIG. 1 was performed.

(44) Influence of the Reactive Grinding Time

(45) First, the influence of the reactive grinding time in the formation of aluminates was studied. To do so, slags Al-1; Al-2 and Al-3 were mixed with CaCO.sub.3 in a molar ratio of Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO equal to 1:1, to subsequently prepare, by means of mechanical compacting, mini briquettes in order to subject them to different thermal treatments. A PA quality reagent for analysis CaCO.sub.3 from PANREAC was used.

(46) Reactive grindings were carried out for different amounts of time (4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h) in a Fritsch Pulverisette 6 mill, at 450 rpm, with 5 stainless steel balls, the balls/mixture weight ratio being 6.5.

(47) Once the grinding time has been completed, cylindrical mini-briquettes (13.5 mm (diameter)5.5 (height)) were prepared, without adding binders, by means of configuration with a Specac Atlas manual 15 T hydraulic press. The pressure applied was 10543 kg/cm.sup.2 with a pressure of 1034 MPa. The quantification of the components of the mixture is included in Table 3.

(48) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 3 Amounts of calcium carbonate (C.sub.100) added to 100 g of slag for a 1:1 molar ratio of Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO Slag C.sub.100 (g) Al-1 105.63 Al-2 85.00 Al-3 107.64

(49) Subsequently, the mini-briquettes are sintered in a furnace made by Termiber de Ingeniera Trmica, S. A., at 1300 C. for 1 h, with a prior isothermal step at 750 C. for 1 h, in order to achieve the complete decomposition of the calcium carbonate.

(50) The sintered products (Al-1S; Al-2S and Al-3S) were characterized by means of x-ray diffraction, Rietveld quantification, chemical analysis and morphological study by means of SEM, using the techniques and methods described in the previous section. FIG. 7 shows the x-ray diffraction diagrams of the products sintered at 1300 C. obtained for the different slags studied.

(51) Based on the study of the mineralogical composition of the sintering products, it is deduced that there is no significant variation of the sintering products based on the grinding time (FIG. 8). Consequently, for the study of the rest of the parameters of the process, a reactive grinding time of 1 hour will be used.

(52) It is important to note the influence that the age of the slag has in the formation of aluminates. Thus, a higher aluminate content is observed in the sintering of Al-3S (CA and C.sub.12A.sub.7) than in the rest. In the Al-3S sintering, the total aluminate content is comprised between 69% and 74% compared to 49%-56% in the Al-1S sintering and 11%-15% in the Al-2S sintering (Table 4).

(53) From the results obtained, the existence of an inverse relation is deduced between the Ca and Al hydrate content in the initial slag and the aluminate content in the sintered product.

(54) TABLE-US-00006 Hydrate content Al-2 > Al-1 > Al-3 Slag age Aluminate content Al-2 < Al-1 < Al-3 of sintered product

(55) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 4 Mineralogical composition of the sintered matter with each of the slags (CaO:Al.sub.2O.sub.3 molar ratio of 1:1. Reaction times comprised between 1 h and 48 h) Al-1S Al-2S Al-3S Crystalline Phases (%) (%) (%) Ca.sub.12Al.sub.14O.sub.33 (C.sub.12A.sub.7) 17.95-21.39 10.96-15.51 22.19-24.68 Al.sub.2CaO.sub.4 (CA) 31.10-34.47 46.51-49.01 Total Aluminates 49-56 11-15 69-74 Al.sub.1.99Fe.sub.0.11Mg.sub.0.90O.sub.4 4.93-6.03 5.85-8.04 9.84-10.64 Ca.sub.20Mg.sub.3Al.sub.26Si.sub.3O.sub.68 40.13-42.86 76.45-82.82 Ca.sub.3Fe.sub.2[SiO.sub.4].sub.3 (andradite) 4.95-5.64 Al.sub.2Ca.sub.2O.sub.7Si (gehlenite) 13.03-15.13 Total rest of Phases 45-49 82-91 28-33

(56) Finally, Table 5 contains the chemical composition of the sintering products obtained for a reactive grinding time of 1 h.

(57) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 5 Chemical composition (% weight) of the sintering products obtained for a reactive grinding time of 1 h and a Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio equal to 1:1 Component Al-1S Al-2S Al-3S Al.sub.2O.sub.3 51.75 49.25 56.63 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 2.68 2.27 1.54 CaO 35.87 39.64 38.14 MgO 2.03 1.40 1.84 SiO.sub.2 5.44 7.82 7.51 MnO.sub.2 0.21 0.14 0.18 NiO 0.04 0.05 0.04 CuO 0.12 0.35 0.09 ZnO 0.29 2.80 0.16

(58) Morphologically, FIG. 9 shows different appearances of the sintering products obtained from each of the slags studied for a reactive grinding time of 1 h.

(59) In FIG. 9, distinct mineralogical phases existing in the sintering products can be identified by means of backscattered electrons.

(60) FIG. 10 shows the ternary diagrams of the Al.sub.2O.sub.3SiO.sub.2CaO and Al.sub.2O.sub.3MgOCaO systems, situating therein the three initial slags and the sintering products obtained with each one of the former (Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio equal to 1:1).

(61) The sintering products are within the area of chemical compositions of synthetic slags indicated by Richarson (1974) [Richarson, F. D. Physical chemistry of metal son metallurgy. Vol. 2. Academic Press, 1974. Synthetic slags for steelmaking. AMG Vanadium, Inc. 2010.] (see FIG. 10) as suitable for use in steel manufacturing, especially for the desulfurization effect thereof. At the same time, the sintering products have MgO content around 2%, which represents added value, since this compound has a favorable effect in the protection of the refractory materials.

(62) Influence of the CaO:Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Molar Ratio in the Formation of Calcium Aluminates

(63) Slag mixtures were prepared with the amounts of CaCO.sub.3 that are included in Table 6 for Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratios of 1:2 and 1:3 in order to subsequently prepare, by means of mechanical compacting, mini-briquettes in order to subject them to thermal treatment. In order to prepare the briquettes with Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio=1:2, an RA quality reagent for analysis CaCO.sub.3 from PANREAC is used, and in order to prepare the ones with Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio=1:3 a limestone from the ARZYZ company was used.

(64) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 6 Amounts of calcium carbonate (C.sub.100) added to 100 g of slag for different molar ratios of Al.sub.2O.sub.3/CaO. C.sub.100 (g) Ratio Ratio Ratio Slag 1:1 1:2 1:3 Al-1 105.63 211.26 316.89 Al-2 85.00 170.00 255.00 Al-3 107.64 215.28 322.92 EM 205.02 338.28

(65) Reactive grindings were carried out for 5 h, in a Fritsch Pulverisette 6 mill, at 450 rpm, with 5 stainless steel balls, the balls/mixture weight ratio being 6.54.

(66) Once the grinding time ended, cylindrical mini-briquettes (13.5 mm (diameter)5.5 (height)) were prepared, without adding binders, by means of configuration with a Specac Atlas manual 15 T hydraulic press, with a pressure of 1034 MPa.

(67) Subsequently, the mini-briquettes are subjected to thermal treatment (sintering) in a furnace made by Termiber de Ingeniera Trmica, S. A., at 1300 C. for 1 h, with a prior isothermal heat step at 750 C. for 1 h in order to achieve the complete decomposition of the calcium carbonate.

(68) The appearance of the briquettes is analyzed before and after the thermal treatment. It is observed that the briquettes show a change in color and good formation after the thermal treatment. The products of the sintering show a different color for each of the two molar ratios tested.

(69) The chemical composition of the sintering products obtained for the different molar ratios and slags used are shown in Table 7.

(70) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 7 Average chemical composition of the sintering materials obtained based on the Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio. Molar ratio 1:1 Molar ratio 1:2 Molar ratio 1:3 Component Al1 Al2 Al3 EM Al1 Al2 Al3 EM Al1 Al2 Al3 EM (% weight) 1S 1S 1S 1S 2S 2S 2S 2S 3S 3S 3S 3S Al.sub.2O.sub.3 51.75 49.25 51.75 41.98 38.12 39.11 42.43 31.88 28.94 34.68 31.23 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 2.68 2.27 2.68 1.69 1.75 1.02 1.73 1.36 1.61 0.81 1.37 CaO 35.87 39.64 35.87 58.87 55.77 55.81 57.54 61.80 63.96 65.32 65.56 MgO 2.03 1.40 2.03 1.07 1.41 1.47 1.60 1.20 0.92 1.29 1.99 SiO.sub.2 5.44 7.82 5.44 3.85 2.50 2.94 3.24 3.87 4.62 4.51 3.47 MnO.sub.2 0.21 0.14 0.21 0.11 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.08 0.11 0.12 NiO 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.027 0.022 0.015 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 CuO 0.12 0.35 0.12 0.29 0.065 0.035 0.15 0.09 0.21 0.05 0.11 ZnO 0.29 2.80 0.29 2.39 2.70 0.12 0.69 0.22 1.91 0.11 0.40

(71) The mineralogical composition, after the phase quantification performed by means of the Rielved method, appears in Table 8.

(72) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 8 Composition (%) in crystalline phase of the sintering products obtained for the Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio equal to 1:3 starting from the initial slags. Molar ratio 1:1 Molar ratio 1:2 Molar ratio 1:3 Component Al1 Al2 Al3 EM Al1 Al2 Al3 EM Al1 Al2 Al3 EM (% weight) 1S 1S 1S 1S 2S 2S 2S 2S 3S 3S 3S 3S CaAl.sub.2O.sub.4 (CA) 31.1 46.5 CaO).sub.3(Al.sub.2O.sub.3) (C.sub.3A) 49.4 49.8 39.2 49.74 85.0 71.6 87.0 82.16 (CaO).sub.12(Al.sub.2O.sub.3).sub.7 (C.sub.12A.sub.7) 18.0 11.0 22.2 32.4 30.6 41.5 31.43 5.2 3.7 5.3 6.45 Total Aluminates 49.1 11.0 68.7 81.9 80.5 80.7 81.17 90.2 75.4 92.2 88.61 Al.sub.1.95Fe.sub.0.49Mg.sub.2.65O.sub.12Si.sub.2.91 4.9 5.9 9.8 2.6 10.9 1.7 3.78 2.3 9.7 1.8 2.94 Ca.sub.3Al.sub.2(SiO.sub.4).sub.2 13.4 16.0 13.34 2.1 1.8 1.4 Ca.sub.6(SiO.sub.4)(Si.sub.3O.sub.10) 7.0 9.0 Al.sub.0.2Fe.sub.1.8MgO.sub.4 2.0 1.0 Ca.sub.20Mg.sub.3Al.sub.26Si.sub.3O.sub.68 40.1 76.4 Ca.sub.3Fe.sub.2[SiO.sub.4].sub.3 4.9 Al.sub.2Ca.sub.2O.sub.7Si 13.0 Total silicates and other phases 45.0 82.3 28.7 16.0 20.0 17.7 17.12 4.4 21.6 3.1 2.94 SiO2 0.2 CaO 3.3 2.8 2.2 5.58 MgO 1.70 2.0 2.3 2.87

(73) Table 8 shows that the sintering products obtained for Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratios greater than 1:1 are fundamentally made up of aluminates. In contrast, for a molar ratio of 1:1 the silicate content and other mineralogical phases is higher than the aluminate content, except for the case of slag Al3 in which the opposite happens. If the EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:2 and EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:3 compositions are compared, an increase in the total aluminate content is observed for the EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:3 slag.

(74) Table 9 compares the aluminate and silicate content in the sintering products obtained for different molar ratios and slags.

(75) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 9 Composition (%) in crystalline phases of the sintering products obtained for the Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratios equal to 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3. Sample Silicates and (molar ratio Aluminates other phases Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO) (%) (%) Al-1 (ratio of 1:1) 49.1 45.0 Al-1 (ratio of 1:1) 11.0 82.3 Al-1 (ratio of 1:1) 68.7 28.7 EM (ratio of 1:1) Al-2 (ratio of 1:) 81.9 16.0 Al-2 (ratio of 1:2) 80.5 19.9 Al-2 (ratio of 1:2) 80.7 17.6 EM (ratio of 1:2) 81.2 17.1 Al-3 (ratio of 1:3) 90.2 4.4 Al-3 (ratio of 1:3) 75.4 21.6 Al-3 (ratio of 1:3) 92.2 3.1 EM (ratio of 1:3) 88.6 2.9

(76) In general, an increase in the Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio causes a significant decrease in the silicate content, which goes from 17% in the sintered EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:2 sample to a low 3% in the EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:3 sample. In other words, an increase in the calcium content in the system favors the reaction of this element with the aluminum, to the detriment of the reaction of the calcium with the silicon.

(77) With a molar ratio of 1:3, a significant change is caused in the nature of the calcium aluminates existing in the sintering products with respect to the composition of the sintering products obtained at Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratios of 1:1 and 1:2. It is observed, for all the slags considered, that the percentage of the mayenite (C.sub.12A.sub.7) decreases which changes from 31% in the sintered EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:2 sample to a low 6% in the majority phase in the EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:3 sample, the disappearance of the monocalcium aluminate CA and the main formation of tricalcium aluminate (C.sub.3A), as the CaO content in the sintering products increases. This is due to the greater diffusion of the Ca.sup.2+ in the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 according to reaction (6) which summarizes the mechanism of the formation process:
A+C.fwdarw.AC+C.fwdarw.C.sub.12A.sub.7+C.fwdarw.C.sub.3A(6)

(78) It can be seen how the increase of CaO (C) in the system transforms the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 into monocalcium aluminate that is then transformed into C.sub.12A.sub.7 and perhaps other intermediary aluminates, and finally into tricalcium aluminate.

(79) In these results, it is important to take into account that the EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:3 sample contains commercial limestone from the company ARZYZ and that, in light of the data obtained, it could be considered that the use thereof does not worsen the result as far as aluminate formation.

(80) FIG. 11 situates, in the CaOAl.sub.2O.sub.3SiO.sub.2 diagram, the sintering products obtained for different molar ratios.

(81) The EM:CaCO.sub.3=1:2 and 1:3 sintering materials enter into the area of chemical compositions of synthetic slags indicated by Richarson in Richarson, F. D. Physical chemistry of metal son metallurgy. Vol. 2. Academic Press, 1974 and indicated in Synthetic slags for steelmaking. AMG Vanadium, Inc. 2010. as suitable for use in steel manufacturing, especially for the desulfuring effect thereof. At the same time, the sintering products obtained, with MgO content of around 2%, which represent added value, since this compound has a favorable effect in the protection of the refractory materials.

(82) FIG. 12 identifies, by means of backscattered electrons, the mineralogical phases existing in the sintering products obtained from each of the slags studied for a reactive grinding time of 1 h and a Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO molar ratio equal to 1:3.

(83) In the sintering products Al1 2S, Al2 2S and Al3 2S, the main phases are calcium aluminates (calcium trialuminateC.sub.3A and mayeniteC.sub.12A.sub.7), the majority being, generally, the C.sub.3A phase.

(84) Finally, FIG. 13 shows the study by means of hot stage microscopy of a sintering sample obtained from the average slag (EM) with a CaO addition necessary for achieving an Al.sub.2O.sub.3:CaO ratio equal to 1:3. The sintering sample is heated at 10 C./min until a final temperature of 1350 C. is reached. It is observed that a decrease in the area of the sample is produced at 1280 C., which indicative of the start of the deformation. However, at the final temperature of the test, the sample does not reach the temperature of the sphere or the semi-sphere, which means that it complies with one of the fundamental properties of the aluminates for use in the metallurgy industry: thermal stability at temperatures to the order of 1300 C.