METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING NON-VISIBLE VEHICLES

Abstract

A method for detecting non-visible vehicles in a vehicle's environment, wherein each vehicle is equipped with at least one proximity sensor, the method comprising for a driven vehicle the steps of: screening, by a receiver of the proximity sensor, any incoming proximity signal capable of propagating through the air along a non-linear path; Receiving an incoming proximity signal coming from a non-visible vehicle (B); processing the received proximity signal to detect the non-visible vehicle; and warning a driver and/or an advanced driver-assistance system about the detected non-visible vehicle.

Claims

1. A method for detecting at least one non-visible vehicle in an environment of a vehicle, wherein each of the vehicle and the at least one non-visible vehicle is equipped with at least one proximity sensor, the method comprising: screening, by a receiver of the proximity sensor of the vehicle, any incoming proximity signal capable of propagating through the air along a non-linear path; receiving an incoming proximity signal coming from the at least one non-visible vehicle; processing the received proximity signal to detect the at least one non-visible vehicle; and warning at least one of a driver and an advanced driver-assistance system about the detected non-visible vehicle.

2. The method of claim 1, comprising a preliminary step of emitting, by an emitter of the proximity sensor of each driven vehicle, a proximity signal capable of propagating through the air along a non-linear path.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the emitted proximity signal is a periodic pulse.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one proximity sensor is an ultrasonic sensor, the proximity signal is an ultrasonic signal, and the screening comprises listening.

5. The method of claim 4, where the ultrasonic sensor is a parking sensor of the vehicle.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the ultrasonic signal is a periodic pulse emitted with maximum power of the parking sensor.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein processing the received proximity signal comprises analysing a Doppler effect to determine a distance and speed of the detected non-visible vehicle.

8. The method of claim 4, wherein the ultrasonic signals are modulated in amplitude and processing the received proximity signal comprises analysing the amplitude modulation to determine any speed variation of the detected non-visible vehicle.

9. The method of claim 8, comprising evaluating and warning about a risk of collision with the detected non-visible vehicle.

10. The method of claim 7, comprising evaluating and warning about a risk of collision with the detected non-visible vehicle.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the proximity sensor includes an emitter, and the receiver is screening any incoming proximity signal either continuously or when the emitter is not emitting.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein each vehicle is equipped with at least one light sensor and the method comprises: detecting at least one visible vehicle in the environment of the vehicle by the at least one light sensor; comparing all vehicles detected by both the light sensor and the proximity sensor; and determining that any vehicles detected by the proximity sensor which are not also detected by the light sensor are non-visible vehicles.

13. An advanced driver assistance system for detecting at least one non-visible vehicle in an environment of a vehicle, the system comprising: at least one proximity sensor including an emitter for emitting a proximity signal capable of propagating through the air along a non-linear path, a receiver configured to operate in a screening mode to screen and receive an incoming proximity signal; a processor for processing the received proximity signal to detect a non-visible vehicle; and a warning unit for providing a warning of the detected non-visible vehicle.

14. The advanced driver assistance system of claim 13, comprising a plurality of proximity sensors arranged at a front, rear and sides of the vehicle and wherein at least one of the proximity sensors is an ultrasonic sensor.

15. The advanced driver assistance system of claim 14, wherein the ultrasonic sensor is a parking sensor.

16. A vehicle equipped with the advanced driver assistance system of claim 13.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing instructions that are executable by at least one computing device to cause the at least one computing device to process a received proximity signal, wherein the proximity signal is received by a proximity sensor configured to operate in a screening receive mode, the proximity signal being capable of propagating through the air along a non-linear path; detecting at least one non-visible vehicle based on the processed proximity signal; and generate a warning about the detected at least one non-visible vehicle.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] Other features and advantages of the present disclosure will appear more clearly from the following detailed description of particular non-limitative examples of the disclosure, illustrated by the appended drawings where:

[0032] FIG. 1A represents a driving scene according to a current situation;

[0033] FIG. 1B represents a similar driving scene as FIG. 1A implementing the method for detecting non-visible vehicles;

[0034] FIG. 2 represents a flowchart of the method for detecting non-visible vehicles; and

[0035] FIG. 3 represents a vehicle including a plurality of sensors useful in an example embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] Before describing in more details one preferred method and system according the present disclosure, one will understand that the present disclosure is perfectly transposable to other specific applications with a need to detect non-visible objects in a crowded environment.

[0037] FIG. 1A represents a driving scene according to the current situation.

[0038] A vehicle (A) moves on the main tracks of the roadway along a work zone delimited by road work fences (10) regularly placed along the tracks. On the other side of the fences, there is a hidden lane for the vehicle (A) on which vehicles (B, C and D) are driving.

[0039] The vehicle (A) is arriving at a crossroad and intends to turn right. At the same time, vehicle (B) is driving forward without being seen by the vehicle (A). It results in a risk of collision between the vehicles (A) and (B).

[0040] Such driving scene would not be safer if vehicles (A) and (B) were equipped with usual sensors like radar and camera as such devices would not be able to detect vehicles through obstacles such as for instance work road fences or a parked vehicle. The delimitation of the risks are represented by two zones: [0041] a safe zone represented by the region covered by a cloud of points; [0042] a non-visible zone or danger zone represented by the hashed region.

[0043] FIG. 1B represents a similar driving scene as FIG. 1A implementing a method to detect vehicles in the non-visible zone.

[0044] In the same manner, the vehicle (A) moves on the main track of the roadway along a work zone delimited by road work fences (10) regularly placed along the track. On the other side of the fences, there is a hidden lane for the vehicle (A) on which vehicles (B, C and D) are driving. The vehicle (A) is arriving at a crossroad and intends to turn right. At the same time, vehicle (B) is driving forward without being seen by the vehicle (A). It results in a risk of collision between the vehicles (A) and (B) where the safe zone and non-visible zone are the same.

[0045] However, in the driving scene of FIG. 1B, both vehicles (A) and (B) are equipped with at least one proximity sensor. Both vehicles are preferably by a plurality of ultrasonic sensors of the parking sensors. More preferably the vehicles can also be equipped with such sensors on their sides so as to be able to emit and receive signal from everywhere.

[0046] The emitters of the proximity sensors of the vehicle (A) emit a proximity signal (PS.sub.A) and the emitters of the proximity sensor of the vehicle (B) emit a proximity signal (PS.sub.B). In the case of a plurality of sensors arranged on the front, the rear and preferably the sides of the vehicle, the proximity signals (PS.sub.A, PS.sub.B) are uniformly propagated around the vehicles (A, B). The proximity signals are preferably ultrasonic pulses periodically emitted.

[0047] The receivers of the proximity sensors of the vehicle (A) receive the incoming proximity signal (PS.sub.B) from vehicle (B) while the receivers of the proximity sensors of the vehicle (B) receive the incoming proximity signal (PS.sub.A) from vehicle (A).

[0048] The received signals by each vehicle (A, respectively B) is then processed to be able to detect a non-visible vehicle (B, respectively A) which is in the vehicle's environment (A, respectively B).

[0049] Although, it is not represented on FIG. 1B, the other non-visible vehicles (C, D) may also be equipped with proximity sensors emitting proximity signals (PS.sub.C, PS.sub.D) and be detected by the vehicle (A).

[0050] The detection of non-visible vehicles (e.g. B, C, D) may be done for instance by analysing the Doppler effect of the received proximity signals to determine the distance and speed of these vehicles.

[0051] In other words, the emitter of the vehicle (B) emits ultrasonic pulses, whose wave front is spherical. The receiver of the vehicle (A) receives the wave with a delay, due to its propagation. Between two pulses, the vehicle (B) has moved with respect to the vehicle (A), and as a result, the spherical wave front does not have the same centre. As a result when approaching the crossroad, as the emitter, i.e. vehicle (B), approaches the receiver, i.e. vehicle (A), the waves arrive at a faster rate than the emission so that the period of the received pulses seems shorter, and therefore the frequency higher. On the other hand, when the emitter moves away from the receiver, the period seems longer, and therefore the frequency smaller. A similar phenomenon occurs when the receiver moves relative to the emitter, or when both move.

[0052] Further by using ultrasonic pulses modulated in amplitude as proximity signals, the proximity signals may be further processed to determine any speed variation of the detected non-visible vehicles (e.g. B, C, D). Based on the detected and processed proximity signals, the vehicle is able to evaluate a risk of collision with any detected non-visible vehicle.

[0053] Then the vehicle (A) may warn the driver and/or an advanced driver-assistance system of vehicle (A) about the detected non-visible vehicle, i.e. vehicle (B). And the vehicle (B) may warn the driver and/or an advanced driver-assistance system of vehicle (B) about the detected non-visible vehicle, i.e. vehicle (A). Such warning reduces the risk of collision between both vehicles (A, B).

[0054] FIG. 2 represents a flowchart of the method for detecting non-visible vehicles.

[0055] During a first step S1, the emitter of the proximity sensor emits a proximity signal. Preferably, the emitter generates a periodic pulse. The generated pulse has preferably a duration of 1 ms (millisecond) so as to reduce as far as possible the power consumption of the proximity sensor. The period between two pulses is 100 ms, i.e. 10 Hz frequency, which is a right compromise between power consumption and safe detection of non-visible vehicles.

[0056] During a second step S2, the receiver of the proximity sensor is active in a screening mode (or listening mode for ultrasonic signals) to be able to detect any incoming proximity signal in the surroundings. The receiver is preferably switched on and become active only when the emitter is not generating a pulse. The listening mode is preferably active for 100 ms between two generated pulses by the emitter. Alternatively, it is possible to continuously let the receiver in the listening mode even when the emitter generates a pulse to avoid any misdetection of a non-visible vehicle which would be emitting synchronously with the listening vehicle.

[0057] During the second step S2, the receiver in the listening mode detects whether an incoming coming from a non-visible vehicle has been received or not. If no proximity signal has been received (alternative N), the method loops on the first step. If a proximity signal has been received (alternative Y), the method loops also on the first step and processes the received signal during a third step.

[0058] During the third step S3, a processor either of the proximity sensor or of an advanced driver-assistance system processes the received proximity signal to detect any non-visible vehicle. Such detection may be performed for example by using the Doppler effect and/or amplitude modulation of the received signals. In this manner, the processor will be able to determine the distance and the speed of the non-visible vehicle.

[0059] During a fourth step S4, whenever a non-visible vehicle has been detected, a warning message will inform the driver and/or the advanced driver-assistance.

[0060] According to an example embodiment, each vehicle is further equipped with at least one light sensor, such as a Lidar or a camera. During a step S.sub.A running in parallel of the screening step, the light sensor is detecting visible vehicles in the vehicle's environment. During a step S.sub.B, the detected vehicles by the proximity sensor during step S3 are compared with the detected vehicles by the light sensor during step S.sub.A. During step S.sub.C, non-visible vehicles are determined as the vehicle which were not detected by the light sensor but only detected by the proximity sensor. The results of step S.sub.C are then used to perform the step S4.

[0061] FIG. 3 represents a vehicle 100 equipped with a plurality of ultrasonic sensors 210, 220 and 230. Preferably the sensors are (existing) parking sensors 210 and 230 arranged on the front and rear of the vehicle. More preferably, it also comprises at least one ultrasonic sensor 220 on the side of the vehicle. Each sensor comprises an emitter and a receiver.

[0062] The vehicle 100 also comprises a processing unit, preferably included in an advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) 300, for processing the signals received by the sensors 210-230. More specifically, the advanced driver assistance system is configured to detect non-visible vehicles in the vehicle's environment.

[0063] For that purpose, at least one of the emitters of the sensors 210-230 emits a proximity signal capable of propagating through the air along a non-linear path. At least one of the receivers of the sensors 210-230 screens any incoming proximity signal from a non-visible vehicle in its environment. Then, the ADAS processes the received proximity signal to detect the non-visible vehicle. When a non-visible vehicle is detected, a warning unit warns the driver and/or the ADAS of the presence of the detected non-visible vehicle.

[0064] The ADAS 300 is connected with a steering unit 400 arranged to steer the vehicle, and a movement control unit 500 comprising a power unit, arranged to maintain or increase a vehicle speed and a braking unit arranged to stop the vehicle or to decrease the vehicle speed. Depending on the evaluation of the risk of collision based on the warning message, the ADAS could assist the driver by adequately controlling the vehicle speed and/or direction.

[0065] According to a preferred embodiment, the vehicle 100 is also equipped with light sensors such as one or several cameras 610 to take a video or a continuous series of pictures when the vehicle is driven, or as an alternative or in addition to the cameras, a 360 scanning unit 620, or a laser light scanning unit (LIDAR) for example. These light sensors may be used to carry out the steps S.sub.A to S.sub.C described in relation with FIG. 2.

[0066] It will be understood that various modifications and/or improvements evident to those skilled in the art can be brought to the different embodiments described in the present description without departing from the scope of the present disclosure defined by the accompanying claims.