LIP FOR EXCAVATING BUCKET

Abstract

A lip for an excavating bucket with a front beam and a rear beam extending along the length of the lip and defining at least one recess between them. The front beam includes noses extending forward of the beam for mounting ground engaging tools. Ribs extend between the front beam and the rear beam. The ribs separate recesses extending between the beams.

Claims

1-23. (canceled)

24. A lip for an excavating bucket having a length extending between opposite sidewalls of the bucket, the lip comprising a front beam and a rear beam extending along the length of the lip, a panel coupling the front and rear beams together, at least one rib interconnecting and spanning between the front and rear beams, and recesses extending along the at least one rib and between the front and rear beams, wherein the lip is thickest at the front beam.

25. The lip of claim 24 including noses extending forward of the front beam for mounting ground engaging tools.

26. The lip of claim 25 wherein the at least one rib includes one said rib in general alignment with each of the noses.

27. The lip of claim 24 wherein the thickness of the panel at the center of the recess is less than 25% of the thickness of the front beam at its thickest point.

28. The lip of claim 24 wherein the thickness of the panel at the center of the recess is less than 50% of the thickness of the rear beam at its thickest point.

29. The lip of claim 24 wherein the front and rear beams each has a substantially continuous extension along the length of the lip.

30. The lip of claim 24 wherein the front beam has a central portion between two ends, and the front beam is bowed with the central portion projecting farther forward than the ends.

31. The lip of claim 24 wherein the total volume of the recesses is at least 15 percent of the total volume of the lip including the total collective volume of the recesses.

32. The lip of claim 24 wherein the total volume of the recesses is at least 18 percent of the total volume of the lip including the total collective volume of the recesses.

33. An excavating bucket comprising walls defining a cavity for receiving earthen materials during a digging operation, and a lip welded to at least one of the walls and having a length extending between opposite side walls of the bucket, the lip including a front beam and a rear beam extending along the length of the lip, a panel coupling the front and rear beams together, at least one rib interconnecting and spanning between the front and rear beams, and recesses extending along the at least one rib and between the front and rear beams, wherein the lip is thickest at the front beam.

34. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the lip includes noses extending forward of the front beam for mounting ground engaging tools.

35. The excavating bucket of claim 34 wherein the at least one rib includes one said rib in general alignment with each of the noses.

36. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the thickness of the panel at the center of the recess is less than 25% of the thickness of the front beam at its thickest point.

37. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the thickness of the panel at the center of the recess is less than 50% of the thickness of the rear beam at its thickest point.

38. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the front and rear beams each has a substantially continuous extension along the length of the lip.

39. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the front beam has a central portion between two ends, and the front beam is bowed with the central portion projecting farther forward than the ends.

40. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the total volume of the recesses is at least 15 percent of the total volume of the lip including the total collective volume of the recesses.

41. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the total volume of the recesses is at least 18 percent of the total volume of the lip including the total collective volume of the recesses.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an excavating bucket with a lip in accordance with the present invention.

[0011] FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an inventive lip.

[0012] FIG. 3 is a bottom perspective view of the inventive lip.

[0013] FIG. 4 is a top view of the inventive lip.

[0014] FIG. 4A is a top view of another embodiment of an inventive lip.

[0015] FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the inventive lip.

[0016] FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view along line 6-6 in FIG. 5.

[0017] FIG. 7 is a front view of the inventive lip.

[0018] FIG. 8 is a cross sectional view along line 8-8 in FIG. 7, with the background features omitted.

[0019] FIG. 9 is a cross sectional view along line 9-9 in FIG. 7.

[0020] FIG. 10 is a cross sectional view along line 10-10 in FIG. 7.

[0021] FIG. 11 is a cross sectional view along line 11-11 in FIG. 7.

[0022] FIG. 12 is a cross sectional view along line 12-12 in FIG. 7.

[0023] FIG. 13 is a rear view of the inventive lip.

[0024] FIG. 14 is a side view of the inventive lip.

[0025] FIG. 15 is a top view of the inventive lip.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0026] The present invention pertains to a lip for excavating buckets such as used with dragline machines, cable shovels, face shovels, hydraulic excavators and the like. The lip includes a dual beam construction and recessed portions to reduce the lip weight while maintaining the needed strength and resistance to bending and twisting.

[0027] A lip 10 in FIG. 1 in accordance with the present invention is welded at a back face 44 and along wings or ears 45 to bucket body 8. Lip 10 has an elongate construction extending between the opposite sidewalls of the bucket body 8. In this application, due to the elongated nature of the lip, the length of the lip is considered the long dimension that extends between the sidewalls of the bucket, even though this dimension is sometimes referred in the industry as the bucket or lip width. The lip includes a set of noses 26 spaced along the lip length and extending forward of the main lip structure for mounting ground engaging tools. Lip 10 is more fully illustrated in FIGS. 2-15.

[0028] Lip 10 includes a rear side 16 with rear face 44, a front side 20, and opposite ends 22, 24. Front side 20 defines a mounting portion 25. Mounting portion 25 forward of beam 32 comprises a series of spaced apart noses 26. Noses 26 receive ground engaging tools such as intermediate adapters or points (not shown) that separate material and direct the material into the bucket while protecting the lip. Noses on the mounting portion are separated by mounting areas 30 for attaching additional ground engaging tools such as shrouds (not shown). Lip 10 is preferably a cast lip, though it could be formed of parts (preferably cast parts) welded 58 together (FIG. 4A).

[0029] In the illustrated embodiment, lip 10 is a stepped lip such that the front side 20 is stepped forward toward the center so that the noses 26 closer to the center of the lip are farther forward than those closer to ends 22, 24 with portions between the noses extending generally along the length of the lip. A lip in accordance with the present invention, though, could have a spade configuration with intermediate portions between the noses inclined to the length of the lip, or reversed step or reverse spade configurations. Further, although lip 10 is shown as linear in front view, it could be bowed or angled vertically across its length, and/or include ends that curve upward.

[0030] A support structure 28 of the lip is rearward of and supports mounting portion 25. Support structure 28 is formed to resist all kinds of loads and turning and bending forces encountered during a digging operation. In the present invention, members forming the support structure include a front beam 32 and a rear beam 34 extending along the length of the lip with at least one recess between the two beams. Conventional lips are formed with a single beam structure to resist the very high loads in a digging operation, particularly the large mining machines. While the single beam structure provides adequate strength and support, the lips tend to be massive and heavy. Some existing lips have recesses, but the weight savings is limited due to the mass that has been required to adequately counter the high loads.

[0031] Ribs 35 preferably extend between beams 32, 34 to better couple the beams and transfer loads from the noses 26 to the bucket. The ribs subdivide the space between the beams to define a set of recesses 36 between beams 32, 34. Beams 32, 34 and ribs 35 are of a substantial depth or thickness relative to the lip along recesses 36. Recesses are defined by rear surface 40 of front beam 32 and front surface 42 of rear beam 34, and the side surfaces of ribs 35.

[0032] Beams 32 and 34 are free of substantial or sudden changes in dimension, and are generally continuous between ends 22 and 24; though they may terminate prior to the actual ends. Superficial changes in the beam structure are possible so long as the primary bulk of each beam as a generally continuous and uninterrupted extension along the length of the lip. The beam can incorporate curves in extending across the lip. Curves in the beam preferably coincide with the intersection of a rib to compensate for stress concentrations induced by the curve. This generally continuous and uninterrupted construction gives the lip a dual beam construction to resist heaving loads and twisting despite the presence of recesses 36. Various changes in beam configuration are possible without departing from the invention. For example, the depth of beam 32 may taper out before the ends. Alternatively, the beams may taper from the ends 22, 24 towards the center of the lip. In the illustrated embodiment ends 22, 24 have wings 45 for welding to sidewalls 12 of the bucket at upper surface 47 and rear surface 49. Wings 45, in this embodiment, extend above the main portion of the lip.

[0033] Preferably, lip 10 is generally smooth and continuous along its upper surface 46 for unobstructed loading of the earthen material into the bucket. The lower surface 50 of the lip is structured for weight savings with the beams 32, 34, recesses 36, and ribs 35. Nevertheless, upper surface 46 and lower surface 50 could have other configurations. For example, recesses 36 are preferably open, but they could be enclosed by a plate welded over the bottom, e.g., between beams 32, 34.

[0034] The top surface 46 of lip 10 can be considered as a panel support structure 28A that couples front beam 32 to rear beam 34. Ribs 35 also preferably join the beams and resist axial and twisting forces as the bucket moves forward through the excavated material. Additionally, one or more panels 56 can be secured to and connect ribs 35 and beams 32, 34 along the underside of the lip to enclose recesses 36 (FIG. 15). The panel or panels provide additional stiffness and support to the lip, and absorb side forces applied to the front of the structure as torsion and warping. The lip structure can be considered a honeycomb with square cells and one side of the cells covered by a structural sheet. The structure also resembles a semi-monocoque construction as compared to the massive single beam constructions of existing lips.

[0035] In a preferred embodiment, front beam 32 is oriented forward in the lip 10, i.e., just rearward of mounting portion 25 to provide greater strength and stability to the wear parts. Front surface 38 of front beam 32 slopes upward from supporting structure 25 to define a smooth transition between beam 32 and ground engaging tool mounts. The beam 32 generally has a greater depth than mounting portion 25. Rear surface 40 of front beam 32 transitions to recessed portion 36. The bottom surface 54 of beam 32 also preferably slopes rearward to reduce wearing during digging, but could have different orientations.

[0036] Since the illustrated embodiment is a stepped lip, front beam 32 is preferably laterally bowed such that the central section 52 is farther forward than end sections 22, 24 (FIG. 5). With this construction, the front beam could have a generally continual forward bowing as shown in FIG. 5. Alternatively, the front beam could have a pair of broad S-shaped bends to define the central forward bowing of the front beam (not shown). In this variation, the bends are preferably generally in line with the noses and the ribs. Front beam 32 can be linear with a straight lip, or bowed in the opposite direction with a reverse spade lip. Front beam 32 could have a curved configuration with the ends higher than the center of the lip when viewed from the front. The lip can take on various shapes as desired regardless of the particular kind of lip involved.

[0037] Rear beam 34 preferably has a reduced depth compared to front beam 32 for enhanced weight savings, improved penetration, reduced wearing, and to match the front of the bucket bottom wall. Rear beam 34 has a front surface 42 that slopes upward to recessed portion 36. Rear surface 44 is generally vertical to match the front of the bucket bottom wall to which it is welded along with the rear face 49 of wings 45 but can include features such as bevels to receive weld material for attaching the lip to the bucket. Rear beam 34 is preferably linear to accommodate the welding to bottom wall, but could be non-linear to facilitate attachments to other bottom wall configurations.

[0038] Ribs 35 extend laterally (i.e., front to back) between front beam 32 and rear beam 34 for increased strength and stiffness of the lip. Ribs 35 are relatively thin supports that intersect rear surface 40 of front beam 32 and front surface 42 of rear beam 34. Preferably, ribs 35 taper in depth rearward to gradually slope from the greater depth of front beam 32 to the lesser depth of rear beam 34. This taper of the ribs reduces weight, improves penetration and lessens wearing. As seen in FIG. 4, ribs 35 are preferably centered behind noses 26 to best transfer the bending moment to the rear beam 34, but they could have other positions or additional ribs in other positions could be provided. Ribs 35 can diverge outward toward the lip ends 22, 24 as they extend from the front beam to the rear beam, but they could be parallel to each other or converging in a rearward direction. The diverging ribs reduce the stress in the lip as the ribs distribute the applied loads out to the bucket. A transverse axis TA extends from the lip front to the rear of the lip perpendicular to the rear beam 44 and the ribs define a longitudinal rib axis RA. In the illustrated embodiment he rib axis inclined to the lip axis at an angle of at least 5 degrees. In an alternative embodiment, a subset of ribs 35 diverge outward as they extend from the front beam to the rear beam and the balance of the ribs do not diverge.

[0039] The configuration of support structure 28 also allows ribs 35 to be narrower than the width of the nose 26 of mounting portion 25. Conventional lips have substantial ribs with widths exceeding that of the noses they support. Using a narrow rib that can provide adequate support and coupling of the front and rear beams in a way that significantly reduces the mass of the lip. Nevertheless, the ribs could have other orientations (e.g., parallel to the axes of the noses, inclined in opposite directions, and the like) and could have other configurations besides generally linear. Also, in this embodiment, wings 45 also extend between beams 32, 34 at ends 22, 24 and function in part similarly to ribs 35. The wings and ribs are collectively referred to as lateral supports.

[0040] Recessed portions 36 between beams 32 and 34 are thinner than adjacent support members and comprise a large portion of the lip. In the illustrated example, the recesses define the entire portion between beams 32, 34 except for ribs 35 and wings 45. As can be seen, the lip has a substantially reduced thickness (or depth) than either of the beams 32, 34. In this example, the centers of the recesses have depths that are less than 25% of the depth at the center of the front beam 32. Similarly, the thickness (or depth) at the center of the recesses is about 50% of the thickness at the center of the rear beam 34. Of course, other relative thicknesses could be used. Recesses 36 can be domed so that they taper in thickness from the edges to the center.

[0041] The recesses of support structure 28 make up a significant portion of the lip in order to achieve the desired weight savings. In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, the weight-savings can be maximized beyond prior lips. For example, in these certain preferred embodiments, the total collective volume of the recesses in the lip is at least about 15% of the total volume of the lip including the volume of the recesses. In one preferred embodiment, the volume of the recesses is about 22% of the total volume of the lip. For example, the total volume of the lip is about 0.731 cubic meters, and the total collective volume of the recesses is about 0.163 cubic meters. The inventive lip can, of course, be used in lips of many different sizes and types. As a comparison, in one prior lip of comparable size, the volume of the recesses is about 12% of the total volume of the lip (including the volume of the recesses). For example, the prior lip volume of 0.80 cubic meters, and the volume of the recesses is about 0.099 cubic meters. In other prior lips, the volume of the recesses range from 7.3% to 14.1%. The prior lips lack the maximized weight-savings construction of the present invention and requires more mass and less recesses to maintain the desired strength. The invention, though, is not dependent on having a total collective volume of the recesses being at least 15% of the total volume of the lip (including the volume of the recesses). In some uses and sizes, a lip in accordance with the present invention (e.g., a lip with front and rear beams separated by one or more recesses) can have a construction where the total collective volume of the recesses is much less than 15% of the total volume of the lip (including the volume of the recesses).

[0042] This advantageous construction of using a pair of spaced apart beams 32, 34 on opposite sides of a recessed portion 36 defined largely by a substantially reduced thickness saves considerable weight in the lip. In one example, the weight savings for a lip of 15,000 pounds is about 1200 pounds. In general, weight savings are anticipated to be around 2-12%, but could be more over a conventional lip. Greater or lesser weight savings will be possible depending on the size of the lip and the type of machine.