Sputtering target material

Abstract

An object of the present invention is to reduce particles generated in sputtering, and in order to achieve such an object, there is provided a sputtering target material including in at. %: 10 to 50% of B; and the balance of at least one of Co and Fe, and unavoidable impurities, in which the intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200), the intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.2B)] of Co.sub.2B (200), or the intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.2B)] of Fe.sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less.

Claims

1. A sputtering target material comprising in at. %: 10 to 50% of B; and the balance of at least one of Co and Fe, and unavoidable impurities, wherein the intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200), the intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.2B)] of Co.sub.2B (200), or the intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.2B)] of Fe.sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less.

2. The sputtering target material according to claim 1, wherein the sputtering target material comprises the balance of Co and Fe, and unavoidable impurities; and the intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less.

3. The sputtering target material according to claim 1, wherein the sputtering target material comprises the balance of Co and unavoidable impurities; and the intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.2B)] of Co.sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less.

4. The sputtering target material according to claim 1, wherein the sputtering target material comprises the balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities; and the intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.2B)] of Fe.sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a view illustrating an XRD pattern obtained by measuring a sputtering target material according to a present invention example by X-ray diffraction.

(2) FIG. 2 is a view illustrating an XRD pattern obtained by measuring a sputtering target material according to a comparative example by X-ray diffraction.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(3) The present invention will be described in detail below. Unless otherwise specified, % in the present invention means at. %.

(4) In a sputtering target material according to the present invention, the content of B is 10 to 50%. An alloy thin film formed in sputtering does not sufficiently become amorphous when the content of B is less than 10%, while it is impossible to reduce particles generated in sputtering when the content of B is more than 50%. Therefore, the content of B is adjusted to 10 to 50%. The content of B is preferably 20 to 50%.

(5) The sputtering target material according to the present invention comprises the balance of at least one of Co and Fe, and unavoidable impurities.

(6) Co and Fe are elements that impart magnetism. The total content of Co and Fe is 50% or more. When the sputtering target material according to the present invention contains only one of Co and Fe, total content of Co and Fe means the content of the one. The sputtering target material according to the present invention may contain up to 1000 ppm of unavoidable impurities.

(7) When the sputtering target material according to the present invention comprises the balance of Co and Fe, and unavoidable impurities, the intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less. The intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] is, for example, 1.4 or less, 1.3 or less, 1.2 or less, 1.1 or less, 1.0 or less, 0.9 or less, 0.8 or less, 0.7 or less, 0.6 or less, or 0.5 or less. The lower limit value of the intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] is 0.0. The X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200) means the intensity of the peak belonging to the (200) plane of (CoFe).sub.2B among X-ray diffraction peaks measured using a Cu-K ray, and the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) means the intensity of the peak belonging to the (121) plane of (CoFe).sub.3B among X-ray diffraction peaks measured using a Cu-K ray. The reason that the X-ray diffraction intensity of the (200) plane of (CoFe).sub.2B and the X-ray diffraction intensity of the (121) plane of (CoFe).sub.3B are used as indices is because the peak of the (200) plane of (CoFe).sub.2B and the peak of the (121) plane of (CoFe).sub.3B do not overlap with other compound peaks and are independent from the other compound peaks as long as being within the ranges of the compositions of the present invention.

(8) When the sputtering target material according to the present invention comprises the balance of Co and unavoidable impurities, the intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.2B)] of Co.sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less. The intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] is, for example, 1.4 or less, 1.3 or less, 1.2 or less, 1.1 or less, 1.0 or less, 0.9 or less, 0.8 or less, 0.7 or less, 0.6 or less, or 0.5 or less. The lower limit value of the intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] is 0.0. The X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.2B)] of Co.sub.2B (200) means the intensity of the peak belonging to the (200) plane of Co.sub.2B among X-ray diffraction peaks measured using a Cu-K ray, and the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121) means the intensity of the peak belonging to the (121) plane of Co.sub.3B among X-ray diffraction peaks measured using a Cu-K ray. The reason that the X-ray diffraction intensity of the (200) plane of Co.sub.2B and the X-ray diffraction intensity of the (121) plane of Co.sub.3B are used as indices is because the peak of the (200) plane of Co.sub.2B and the peak of the (121) plane of Co.sub.3B do not overlap with other compound peaks and are independent from the other compound peaks as long as being within the ranges of the compositions of the present invention.

(9) When the sputtering target material according to the present invention comprises the balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities, the intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.2B)] of Fe.sub.2B (200) is 1.50 or less. The intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] is, for example, 1.4 or less, 1.3 or less, 1.2 or less, 1.1 or less, 1.0 or less, 0.9 or less, 0.8 or less, 0.7 or less, 0.6 or less, or 0.5 or less. The lower limit value of the intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] is 0.0. The X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.2B)] of Fe.sub.2B (200) means the intensity of the peak belonging to the (200) plane of Fe.sub.2B among X-ray diffraction peaks measured using a Cu-K ray, and the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) means the intensity of the peak belonging to the (121) plane of Fe.sub.3B among X-ray diffraction peaks measured using a Cu-K ray. The reason that the X-ray diffraction intensity of the (200) plane of Fe.sub.2B and the X-ray diffraction intensity of the (121) plane of Fe.sub.3B are used as indices is because the peak of the (200) plane of Fe.sub.2B and the peak of the (121) plane of Fe.sub.3B do not overlap with other compound peaks and are independent from the other compound peaks as long as being within the ranges of the compositions of the present invention.

(10) (CoFe).sub.3B, Co.sub.3B, and Fe.sub.3B are not stable as compounds, and therefore cause particles in sputtering when being present in a sputtering target material. In contrast, in the present invention, the rates of (CoFe).sub.3B, Co.sub.3B, and Fe.sub.3B with respect to (CoFe).sub.2B, (Co.sub.2B), and Fe.sub.2B which are steadily formed as stable compounds so that the contents of B are in a range of 10 to 50% are adjusted so that X-ray diffraction intensity ratios [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]], [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)], and [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I ((Fe.sub.2B)] are 1.50 or less, whereby particles can be reduced in sputtering. (CoFe).sub.3B and (CoFe).sub.2B are obtained by replacing some of Co atoms in Co.sub.3B and (Co.sub.2B) by Fe atoms, respectively.

EXAMPLES

(11) The sputtering target material according to the present invention will be specifically described below with reference to Examples.

(12) A molten raw material was weighed to achieve each composition shown in Tables 1 and 2, induction-heating melted in a refractory crucible having an Ar gas atmosphere with a reduced pressure or a vacuum atmosphere, then tapped from a nozzle having a diameter of 8 mm in the lower portion of the crucible, and gas-atomized with an Ar gas. A solidification rate can be controlled by adjusting the injection pressure of the Ar gas. The solidification rate is increased with increasing the injection pressure. The particle size distribution of a gas-atomized powder can be adjusted by controlling the solidification rate. The width of the particle size distribution is decreased with increasing the solidification rate.

(13) A powder that satisfied any of particle size conditions A, B, and C described later was prepared by removing coarse particles having a particle diameter of 500 m or more, which were not suitable for molding, from the obtained gas-atomized powder, and then removing fine particles, of which the structure became a rapidly solidified structure due to a great influence by quenching by atomization, from the powder from which the coarse particles had been removed.

(14) The particle size conditions A, B, and C are defined as follows.

(15) The particle size condition A is defined as a condition that the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 5 m or less is 10% or less, and the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 30 m or less is 40% or less, in the particle size distribution of powder (particle assemblage).

(16) The particle size condition B is defined as a condition that the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 5 m or less is 8% or less, and the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 30 m or less is 35% or less, in the particle size distribution of a powder (particle assemblage).

(17) The particle size condition C is defined as a condition that the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 5 m or less is 5% or less, and the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 30 m or less is 30% or less, in the particle size distribution of a powder (particle assemblage).

(18) A powder that satisfies all the particle size conditions A, B, and C is regarded as a powder that satisfies the particle size condition C, and a powder that satisfies the particle size conditions A and B is regarded as a powder that satisfies the particle size condition B.

(19) The removal of the coarse particles having a particle diameter of 500 m or more can be performed by classification using a sieve having an opening of 500 m or less, for example, an opening of 250 to 500 m. The removal of the fine particles for preparing the powder that satisfies any of the particle size conditions A, B, and C can be performed by classification using sieves having an opening of 5 m or less and/or an opening of 30 m or less. In the present examples, the removal of the coarse particles having a particle diameter of 500 m or more, which were not suitable for molding, was performed by classification using a sieve having an opening of 500 m. The removal of the fine particles for preparing the powder that satisfied the particle size condition A was performed by classification using a sieve having an opening of 35 m. The removal of the fine particles for preparing the powder that satisfied the particle size condition B was performed by classification using a sieve having an opening of 30 m. The removal of the fine particles for preparing the powder that satisfied the particle size condition C was performed by classification using a sieve having an opening 25 m. A particle diameter and a particle size distribution were measured and confirmed by a laser diffraction/scattering-type particle size distribution measurement apparatus (MICROTRAC). The powder that was prepared by removing the coarse particles and the fine particles and satisfied any of the particle size conditions A, B, and C was used as a raw powder. The raw powder was degassing-charged into an SC can having an outer diameter of 220 mm, an inner diameter of 210 mm, and a length of 200 mm. The powder-filled billet described above was sintered under conditions shown in Tables 1 and 2 to produce a sintered body. The solidified molded product produced by the method described above was processed into a disk shape having a diameter of 180 mm and a thickness of 7 mm by wire cut, turning processing, and plane polishing, to form a sputtering target material. Examples of the molding method include, but are not particularly limited to, HIP, hot press, SPS, and hot extrusion.

(20) A molten raw material was weighed to achieve each composition shown in the raw powder column of Table 3, induction-heating melted in a refractory crucible having an Ar gas atmosphere with a reduced pressure or a vacuum atmosphere, then tapped from a nozzle having a diameter of 8 mm in the lower portion of the crucible, and gas-atomized with an Ar gas. A powder that satisfied any of the particle size conditions A, B, and C was prepared by removing coarse particles having a particle diameter of 500 m or more, which were not suitable for molding, from the obtained gas-atomized powder, and then removing fine particles, of which the structure became a rapidly solidified structure due to a great influence by quenching by atomization, from the powder from which the coarse particles had been removed. The removal of the coarse particles and the fine particles was performed in manners similar to the manners described above. The particle size distribution of the powder was measured and confirmed by a laser diffraction/scattering-type particle size distribution measurement apparatus (MICROTRAC). Such powders that were prepared by removing the coarse particles and the fine particles and satisfied any of the particle size conditions A, B, and C were used as raw powders. The raw powders were mixed at a mixture ratio shown in Table 3 in a V-type mixer for 30 minutes to thereby form a composition shown in Table 3, and the resultant mixture was degassing-charged into an SC can having an outer diameter of 220 mm, an inner diameter of 210 mm, and a length of 200 mm. The powder-filled billet described above was sintered under conditions shown in Table 3 to produce a sintered body. The solidified molded product produced by the method described above was processed into a disk shape having a diameter of 180 mm and a thickness of 7 mm by wire cut, turning processing, and plane polishing, to form a sputtering target material. Examples of the molding method include, but are not particularly limited to, HIP, hot press, SPS, and hot extrusion.

(21) Comparative Examples are shown in Table 4. A molten raw material was weighed to achieve each composition shown in Table 4, induction-heating melted in a refractory crucible having an Ar gas atmosphere with a reduced pressure or a vacuum atmosphere, then tapped from a nozzle having a diameter of 8 mm in the lower portion of the crucible, and gas-atomized with an Ar gas. Coarse particles having a particle diameter of 500 m or more, which were not suitable for molding, were removed from the obtained gas-atomized powder, and the powder from which the coarse particles had been removed and from which fine particles were not removed was used as a raw powder. The raw powder was degassing-charged into an SC can having an outer diameter of 220 mm, an inner diameter of 210 mm, and a length of 200 mm. The powder-filled billet described above was sintered under conditions shown in Table 4 to produce a sintered body. The solidified molded product produced by the method described above was processed into a disk shape having a diameter of 180 mm and a thickness of 7 mm by wire cut, turning processing, and plane polishing, to form a sputtering target material.

(22) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Composition of XRD intensity ratio sputtering target Molding [I(CoFe.sub.3)B]/I(CoFe.sub.2)B] material (at. %) Particle size Particle Molding Molding pressure [I(Co.sub.3B)/I(Co.sub.2B)] Particle No Co Fe B condition size temperature ( C.) time (h) (MPa) [I(Fe.sub.3B)/I(Fe.sub.2B)] evaluation Remarks 1 31.5 58.5 10 A 5 m: 1000 2 100 1.4 C Present 9% Invention 30 m: Examples 38% 2 33.25 51.75 15 B 5 m: 1000 2 100 1.4 C 6% 30 m: 33% 3 28 52 20 A 5 m: 1000 2 100 1.5 C 6% 30 m: 33% 4 18 72 10 A 5 m: 1000 2 100 1.4 C 7% 30 m: 37% 5 60 20 20 B 5 m: 1000 2 150 1.3 C 3% 30 m: 32% 6 72 8 20 A 5 m: 1000 2 150 1.5 C 3% 30 m: 36% 7 90 0 10 C 5 m: 700 3 150 0.5 A 4% 30 m: 25% 8 80 0 20 C 5 m: 800 3 150 0.5 A 2% 30 m: 21% 9 70 0 30 B 5 m: 1000 3 100 1.1 B 6% 30 m: 32% 10 60 0 40 C 5 m: 1100 3 100 0.0 A 4% 30 m: 18% 11 50 0 50 C 5 m: 1100 5 150 0.0 A 0% 30 m: 25% 12 83 5 12 A 5 m: 800 5 150 0.9 A 10% 30 m: 40% 13 5 70 25 B 5 m: 1100 5 150 1.0 B 8% 30 m: 35% 14 62 10 28 A 5 m: 800 5 150 0.9 A 8% 30 m: 39% 15 48 20 32 A 5 m: 9% 800 5 150 0.5 A 30 m: 35% 16 22 40 38 C 5 m: 5% 900 5 150 0.0 A 30 m: 30% 17 25 30 45 A 5 m: 8% 1000 4 150 0.0 B 30 m: 38% 18 5 45 50 B 5 m: 5% 1000 3 100 0.0 B 30 m: 35% 19 70 5 25 A 5 m: 9% 800 5 150 0.7 A 30 m: 38% 20 40 40 20 B 5 m: 5% 800 5 150 0.0 A 30 m: 31%

(23) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Composition of XRD intensity ratio sputtering target [I(CoFe.sub.3)B]/I(CoFe.sub.2)B] material (at. %) Particle size Particle Molding Molding Molding [I(Co.sub.3B)/I(Co.sub.2B)] Particle No Co Fe B condition size temperature ( C.) time (h) pressure (MPa) [I(Fe.sub.3B)/I(Fe.sub.2B)] evaluation Remarks 21 60 20 20 C 5 m: 2% 800 5 150 0.1 A Present 30 m: Invention 27% Examples 22 0 90 10 A 5 m: 800 4 130 0.0 A 10% 30 m: 39% 23 0 80 20 A 5 m: 8% 800 5 130 0.0 A 30 m: 39% 24 0 70 30 A 5 m: 700 3 130 0.5 A 10% 30 m: 36% 25 0 60 40 A 5 m: 1000 5 130 0.0 B 10% 30 m: 39% 26 0 50 50 B 5 m: 7% 1100 5 130 0.5 B 30 m: 33%

(24) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 XRD intensity ratio [I(CoFe.sub.3)B/ I(CoFe.sub.2)B] Composition Molding [I(Co.sub.3B)/ of sputtering Mixed Particle temper- Molding Molding I(Co.sub.2B)] target material raw powders ( ): size apture time pressure [I(Fe.sub.3B)/ Particle No (at. %) mixture ratio condition Particle size ( C.) (h) (MPa) I(Fe.sub.2B)] evaluation Remarks 27 20Co60Fe20B Fe1Co20B(25) A 5 m: 8% 1000 5 150 0.1 B Present Co20B(75) 30 m: 36% Invention 28 40Co40Fe20B Fe1Co20B(50) B 5 m: 7% 1000 5 100 0.2 B Examples Co20B(50) 30 m: 34% 29 60Co20Fe20B Fe1Co20B(75) B 5 m: 6% 900 4 130 0.2 B Co20B(25) 30 m: 32% 30 50Co20Fe30B Fe1Co30B(28) C 5 m: 4% 1000 2 120 0.2 B Co30B(72) 30 m: 28% 31 15Co45Fe40B Fe1Co40B(75) B 5 m: 6% 1100 3 150 0.1 B Co40B(25) 30 m: 33% 32 40Co10Fe50B Fe1Co40B(20) B 5 m: 5% 1100 2 150 0.2 B Co40B(80) 30 m: 31%

(25) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Composition of XRD intensity ratio sputtering Molding Molding [I(CoFe.sub.3)B]/I(CoFe.sub.2)B] target material (at. %) temperature Molding pressure [I(Co.sub.3B)/I(Co.sub.2B)] Particle No Co Fe B Particle size ( C.) time (h) (MPa) [I(Fe.sub.3B)/I(Fe.sub.2B)] evaluation Remarks 33 31.5 58.5 10 5 m: 11% 1000 2 100 1.8 D Comparative 30 m: 39% Examples 34 33.25 61.75 5 5 m: 9% 1000 2 100 1.9 D 30 m: 41% 35 28 52 20 5 m: 12% 1000 2 100 2 D 30 m: 34% 36 18 72 10 5 m: 7% 1000 2 100 3 D 30 m: 42% 37 60 20 20 5 m: 13% 1000 2 100 6 D 30 m: 29% 38 72 8 20 5 m: 4% 1000 2 100 4.5 D 30 m: 43% 39 70 0 30 5 m: 14% 1000 5 150 8 D 30 m: 45% NOTE: The underlined figures fall outside the scope of the present invention.

(26) Nos. 1 to 32 shown in Tables 1 to 3 are present invention examples, while Nos. 33 to 39 shown in Table 4 are Comparative Examples.

(27) X-ray diffraction intensity was evaluated as follows.

(28) The intensity of an X-ray diffraction peak at 2=20 to 80 was measured under the condition of a scan speed of 4/min by using a Cu-K ray as an X-ray source.

(29) Among measured X-ray diffraction peaks, the intensity of the peak belonging to the (200) plane of (CoFe).sub.2B was regarded as the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200), and the intensity of the peak belonging to the (121) plane of (CoFe).sub.3B was regarded as the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121), when the sputtering target material contains both of Co and Fe. The intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200) was calculated.

(30) Among measured X-ray diffraction peaks, the intensity of the peak belonging to the (200) plane of Co.sub.2B was set at the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Co.sub.2B]] of Co.sub.2B (200), and the intensity of the peak belonging to the (121) plane of Co.sub.3B was regarded as the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Co.sub.3B]] of Co.sub.3B (121), when the sputtering target material contains Co but does not contain Fe. The intensity ratio [I [Co.sub.3B]/I [Co.sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Co.sub.3B]] of Co.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Co.sub.2B]] of Co.sub.2B (200) was calculated.

(31) Among measured X-ray diffraction peaks, the intensity of the peak belonging to the (200) plane of Fe.sub.2B was set at the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Fe.sub.2B]] of Fe.sub.2B (200), and the intensity of the peak belonging to the (121) plane of Fe.sub.3B was regarded as the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Fe.sub.3B]] of Fe.sub.3B (121), when the sputtering target material contains Fe but does not contain Co. The intensity ratio [I [Fe.sub.3B]/I [Fe.sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Fe.sub.3B]] of Fe.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [Fe.sub.2B]] of Fe.sub.2B (200) was calculated.

(32) As examples of an XRD pattern, the XRD pattern of 70Co-5Fe-25B of a present invention example No. 19 is shown in FIG. 1, and the XRD pattern of 72Co-8Fe-20B of a comparative example No. 38 is shown in FIG. 2.

(33) Particles were evaluated as follows.

(34) A film was formed on an aluminum substrate having a diameter of 95 mm and a sheet thickness of 1.75 mm by DC magnetron sputtering at an Ar gas pressure of 0.9 Pa using the sputtering target materials of each of the present invention examples and the comparative examples, and the number of particles having a size of 0.1 m or more was evaluated with Optical Surface Analyzer. Particles of which the number was 10 or less were evaluated as excellent and represented by A, particles of which the number was 11 to 100 were evaluated as good and represented by B, particles of which the number was 101 to 200 was evaluated as fair and represented by C, and particles of which the number was 201 or more was evaluated as poor and represented by D.

(35) In Comparative Example No. 33, an X-ray diffraction intensity ratio was more than 1.5, and consequently, particles were evaluated as very poor because a raw powder satisfied none of the particle size conditions A to C (the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 5 m or less was 11% in the particle size distribution of the raw powder).

(36) In Comparative Example No. 34, an X-ray diffraction intensity ratio was more than 1.5, and consequently, particles were evaluated as very poor because the content of B in a sputtering target material was 5%, and a raw powder satisfied none of the particle size conditions A to C (the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 30 m or less was 11% in the particle size distribution of the raw powder).

(37) In Comparative Example Nos. 35 and 37, X-ray diffraction intensity ratios were more than 1.5, and consequently, particles were evaluated as very poor because raw powders satisfied none of the particle size conditions A to C (the cumulative volumes of particles having a diameter 5 m or less were 12% and 13%, respectively, in the particle size distributions of the raw powders).

(38) In Comparative Example Nos. 36 and 38, X-ray diffraction intensity ratios were more than 1.5, and consequently, particles were evaluated as very poor because raw powders satisfied none of the particle size conditions A to C (the cumulative volumes of particles having a particle diameter of 30 m or less were 42% and 43%, respectively, in the particle size distributions of the raw powders).

(39) In Comparative Example No. 39, an X-ray diffraction intensity ratio was more than 1.5, and consequently, particles were evaluated as very poor because a raw powder satisfied none of the particle size conditions A to C (the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 5 m or less and the cumulative volume of particles having a particle diameter of 30 m or less were 14% and 45%, respectively, in the particle size distribution of the raw powder).

(40) In contrast, each of Present Invention Example Nos. 1 to 32 shown in Tables 1 to 3 resulted in particles evaluated as excellent because of comprising 10 to 50% of B, and the balance of at least one of Co and Fe, and unavoidable impurities, wherein an intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]], an intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)], or an intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] was 1.50 or less.

(41) As described above, fine particles, of which the structure becomes a rapidly solidified structure due to a great influence by quenching by atomization, are removed from an atomized powder produced by rapid solidification by gas atomization, whereby (CoFe).sub.3B, Co.sub.3B, or Fe.sub.3B which is not a stable phase in the rapidly solidified structure is removed, and the amount of (CoFe).sub.3B, Co.sub.3B, or Fe.sub.3B present in a sputtering target material can be reduced by using, as a raw powder of the sputtering target material, the atomized powder from which (CoFe).sub.3B, Co.sub.3B, or Fe.sub.3B has been removed. As a result, the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121), the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121), or the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) can be decreased, and particles in sputtering can be reduced to improve the product yield of a sputtering film by setting the intensity ratio [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]/I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.3B]] of (CoFe).sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I [(CoFe).sub.2B]] of (CoFe).sub.2B (200), the intensity ratio [I (Co.sub.3B)/I (Co.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.3B)] of Co.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Co.sub.2B)] of Co.sub.2B (200), or the intensity ratio [I (Fe.sub.3B)/I (Fe.sub.2B)] of the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.3B)] of Fe.sub.3B (121) to the X-ray diffraction intensity [I (Fe.sub.2B)] of Fe.sub.2B (200) at 1.50 or less.