SURFACE MOUNT SECURITY BARRIER
20200362524 ยท 2020-11-19
Inventors
Cpc classification
E01F13/12
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
Abstract
A surface mount security barrier includes a non-metallic matrix supporting and substantially encapsulating metal ballast. The security barrier has a mass in excess of 6 tonnes and a ratio of metal ballast to non-metallic matrix in excess of 1.5:1 by mass. A method of manufacturing such a security barrier is also provided.
Claims
1. A unitary surface mount security barrier, the barrier comprising: a non-metallic matrix, comprising concrete, supporting and substantially encapsulating metallic ballast, wherein said security barrier has a mass in excess of 6 tonnes and a ratio of metallic ballast to non-metallic matrix in excess of 1.5:1 by mass.
2. The surface mount security barrier of claim 1 wherein the ratio of metallic ballast to non-metallic matrix in excess of 2:1 by mass.
3. (canceled)
4. The surface mount security barrier of claim 1 having a bottom face and a top face and wherein the metallic ballast comprises a first layer of one or more pieces of metallic ballast located between the bottom face and the top face.
5. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 4 wherein the metallic ballast comprises at least a second layer of one or more pieces of metallic ballast located above the first layer and between the bottom face and the top face.
6. The surface mount security barrier of claim 4 wherein the matrix extends between said pieces of metallic ballast isolating them from one another.
7. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 1 comprising one or more lifting points embedded therein, said lifting points comprising two or more box sections extending therethrough and opening on opposing surfaces thereof.
8. (canceled)
9. The surface mount security barrier of claim 1 wherein the metallic ballast comprises one or more of: steel; lead; one or more pieces of metallic ballast, each said piece comprising a single elongate section of metallic billet; one or more pieces of metallic ballast, each said piece comprising a plurality of elongate section of billet; and one or more pieces of metallic ballast, each said piece comprising a plurality of pieces of metal, especially metal balls or small pieces of scrap metal, bound together by a binder material.
10. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 4 wherein the mass of the metallic ballast is biased towards a bottom face of the security barrier and wherein the first layer of at least one piece of metallic ballast is located in a lower 50% of the height of the security barrier.
11. (canceled)
12. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 10 wherein the first layer of at least one piece of metallic ballast comprises in excess of 60% of the metallic ballast.
13. (canceled)
14. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 1 further comprising a rebar cage substantially embedded within the matrix below the surface of said security barrier and surrounding said ballast within said matrix.
15. (canceled)
16. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 1 having a mass in the range of 7.5 tonnes and 8.5 tonnes, optionally comprising at least 5.5 tonnes of ballast.
17. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 7 having a bench or seat attached to one or more sides thereof wherein said bench or seat is attached to said lifting point.
18. The surface mount security barrier according to claim 1 further comprising a plurality of metal feet extending from a bottom surface thereof.
19. The surface mount security barrier of claim 18, further comprising a rebar cage substantially embedded within the matrix below the surface of said security barrier and surrounding said ballast within said matrix wherein said metal feet are formed as part of the rebar cage.
20. A surface mount security barrier system comprising a surface mount security barrier according to claim 1 and an anti-skid plate beneath said surface mount security barrier and wherein the anti-skid plate has a plurality of metal feet extending downwardly therefrom, said anti-skid plate comprising a steel tray in which the surface mount security barrier is located.
21. (canceled)
22. The surface mount security barrier of claim 1 further comprising one or more fence post holes extending downwardly into a top surface thereof.
23. The surface mount security barrier of claim 1 further comprising one or more post footing extending downwardly into a top surface thereof, said post footing for receiving, in use a post.
24. A security fence comprising a plurality of surface mount security barriers according to claim 22, a fence post located in one or more fence post holes in each said surface mount security barrier, and: at least one fence panel attached to fence posts of said adjacent surface mount security barrier, or at least one openable gate attached to said fence posts of said adjacent surface mount security barrier.
25. A security fence comprising a plurality of surface mount security barriers according to claim 23, a spring steel security post located in the security post footing of adjacent surface mount security barriers and a further security barrier comprising either one or more flexible barrier or a rigid barrier extending between the security posts of said adjacent surface mount security barriers, and wherein said flexible or rigid barrier is either permanently attached to said security posts, or is releasable from said security posts to create an openable barrier.
26. A method of manufacturing a unitary security barrier comprising a non-metallic matrix supporting and substantially encapsulating metallic ballast, wherein said security barrier has a mass in excess of 6 tonnes and a ratio of metallic ballast to non-metallic matrix in excess of 1.5:1 by mass, the method comprising: placing a first piece of a rebar cage, comprising at least a lower face of said rebar cage, adjacent a lower surface of a mould; placing a first layer of at least one piece of metallic ballast above said lower face of the rebar cage; placing at least two lifting points within the mould; placing a second piece of a rebar cage within the mould, the second piece of the rebar cage comprising the remaining faces thereof; and pouring concrete into the mould to substantially encapsulate said metallic ballast and rebar cage.
27-31. (canceled)
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0030] One or more embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0046] A security barrier, also known as a crash barrier, in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention is described herein with reference to the accompanying
[0047] With reference to
[0048] The security barrier 10 has an internal structure, as shown in
[0049] Referring to
[0050] The interior structure of the security barrier 10 comprises a first and second layer of pieces of metallic ballast which are in the form of steel blocks 18 located between a top face 20 and a bottom face 22 of the security barrier 10. In the embodiment shown the first layer comprises a first array of blocks and the second layer comprises a second array of blocks. The steel blocks 18 may comprise solid pieces of steel billet or may each comprise a plurality of strips of steel, placed adjacent one another or attached together. In the example embodiment the steel blocks 18 have a mass of 6000 kg (+/10%). This results in a ratio of metallic ballast to matrix of approximately 3:1 (excluding the rebar cage). It will be appreciated that a lower ration of ballast to matrix may be used from 1.5:1 upwards, for example the ration may be at least 1.75:1, at least 1.8:1, at least 2:1, or at least 2.25:1, or at least 2.5:1. It will be appreciated that increasing the ratio of metallic matrix to non-metallic aggregate increases the average density of the barrier, thereby enabling the same total mass to be achieved in a smaller space envelope, allowing for a more discreet and practical barrier without reducing its effectiveness. The pieces of metallic ballast forming the first layer have a greater mass than the pieces of metallic ballast forming the second layer. The first layer of steel blocks may account for in excess of 60% of the mass of the metallic ballast, optionally in excess of 70% or 80%. This biasing may be achieved by using different sizes of pieces of metallic ballast in each layer, a different number of pieces of metallic ballast in each layer, or different densities of metallic ballast (i.e. different metals or alloys) in each layer. By biasing the mass of the ballast, which has a greater density than the matrix, towards the bottom of the security barrier the stability of the barrier is increased under impact.
[0051] The steel blocks 18 are substantially surrounded by a rebar cage 24 that extends below, above and around the array of steel blocks 18 and substantially adjacent to, but beneath, the respective exterior surfaces of the cast concrete that surrounds the interior structure 16. Although shown as a rectangular array, the steel blocks 18 may alternatively be arranged in a linear array, or irregularly. It will also be appreciated that although shown as rectangular blocks, alternative shaped pieces of metallic ballast can be used as described in more detail below. The steel blocks 18 are arranged in spaced relationship to one another such than when encased in the cast concrete 14, the concrete passes around and between them in a continuous structure.
[0052] In the example embodiment a rebar cage 24 as shown in
[0053] A first layer of the steel blocks 18 is then located in the first part 26 of the rebar cage in a linear array, and a first two lengths of box section 38 are laid on top of them extending across the rebar cage 24 and protruding slightly from each side thereof.
[0054] The two lengths of box section 38 are dimensioned so that they are the same length as the width of the formed security barrier 10 and are located on top of the first layer of steel blocks 18 substantially perpendicular thereto. Optionally, a second two lengths of box section 44, which may be substantially identical to the first two lengths of box section 38, may be located below the lower face of the rebar cage. These second two lengths of box section 44, may form additional lifting points and/or additional fixing points for seats, benches or other furniture. The length of the first two lengths of box section 38 are such that they open onto opposing faces of the formed security barrier 10. A cover is placed over the end of each length of box section 38 to prevent concrete entering therein during the casting of the concrete matrix 14 around the ballast and rebar. The cover may be a bespoke cover or may for example simply be a temporary cover made of tape. After the security barrier 10 is cast the covers are removed and either disposed of or used in the fabrication of further security barriers. The second two lengths of box section 44 may be arranged in a similar manner.
[0055] A second layer of steel blocks 18 is then located above the first layer substantially parallel to the first layer and the remaining two faces being a top face 40 (
[0056] The interior structure 16 is then encased in concrete as described above. The arrangement of the ballast as described above ensures that when the concrete is added it is able to extend between the pieces of ballast thereby substantially isolating them from each other. It also ensures that the concrete matrix is one continuous piece of concrete.
[0057] Referring to
[0058] At 102 the second two lengths of box section 44 are placed on the lower face of a substantially rectangular mould. The mould (not shown) comprises a bottom surface with four side pieces pivotally connected thereto such that they can be pivoted upwards to form a rectangular mould.
[0059] At 104 the first part 26 of the rebar cage 24 is placed adjacent a lower surface of the mould over the top of the second two lengths of box section 44.
[0060] At 106 a first linear array of steel bars 18 is placed on top of the first part of the rebar cage.
[0061] At 108 the first two lengths of box section 38 are placed above, optionally on top of, the first linear array of steel bars 18 substantially perpendicular thereto. Either prior to placement or after placement a cover is placed over the ends of at least each of the first two lengths of box section 38 and optionally over the ends of the second two lengths of box section 44.
[0062] At 110 a second linear array of steel bars 18 is placed on top of the first two lengths of box section 38, substantially parallel to the first linear array of steel bars 18.
[0063] At 112 the remaining faces of the rebar cage 24 not forming part of the first part 26 are added and fixed in place.
[0064] At 114 the mould is closed by raising the side pieces and securing them in place. It will be appreciated that this step is optional and may not be needed depending on the mould design.
[0065] At 116 concrete is added to the mould such that it fills all the spaces between the steel bars 18, the rebar and the lengths of box section 38, 44, and is left to solidify.
[0066] A security barrier 10 designed and manufactured according to the example embodiment was tested and passed the BSI IWA14.2013 collision test. In the test the security barrier 10 was placed on top of the test surface (flat concrete) without any attachment thereto or any foundations. A 7.5 tonne truck was collided with the security barrier 10 travelling at 64 kph (40 mph) and was stopped in its tracks. The security barrier 10 was impacted centrally on its two meter long face. It did not roll or spin and remained intact.
[0067] Referring now to
[0068] In order to manufacture the security barrier 10a the process described above in relation to
[0069] Once the security barrier 10a has been cast and has hardened, after it is removed from the mould the polyurethane foam sheet 46 is removed from the lower surface thereof. Rubber or plastic caps (not shown) can then optionally be fitted over the projecting metal feet 36. In use this allows the security barrier to be positioned and repositioned by lifting and moving, onto surfaces without the feet causing damage. If, however, in use the security barrier 10a is struck, e.g. by a vehicle, with sufficient force to move it the pressure on the feet 36 will result in the caps being broken or torn off allowing the metal feet 36 to dig into the surface and further impede movement of the block.
[0070] Although the manufacturing method described hereinabove relates to the use of a polyurethane sheet 46, it will be appreciated that any suitable sheet material could be used. For example, if a sheet with premade holes is to be used then the sheet material could be a sheet of wood, for example. If, on the other hand, the feet are punched into the material then any material that will allow penetration of point pressure applied to the feet 36 but will substantially not crush under the even loading of the concrete when added to the mould, may be used. In addition, a thin sheet, for example a plastic sheet, may be applied between the sheet material and the concrete to prevent adhesion of the concrete to the sheet material to facilitate easy removal.
[0071] Referring now to
[0072] Referring to
[0073]
[0074] This design enables a fence to quickly be erected on the security barriers 10 that can then provide a single, or double, pedestrian barrier as well as a vehicular barrier. Although described herein as supporting fence panels 68 it will be appreciated that the fence posts 57 or the support posts 60 ay be used to support other security enhancements, for example a fence panel may have therein or may be replaced with an openable gate to selectively allow, for example, pedestrian access past the security barrier. In addition to the fence posts, spring steel security posts 64 are provided in the embedded post footings 54 and a plurality of wires 66 as described in WO 2015/033100 are attached between the security posts 64 of adjacent security barriers, thereby further inhibiting vehicular passage, in particular potentially allowing for a greater spacing between the security barriers.
[0075] Referring to
[0076] It will be appreciated that the embodiments described herein are given as examples of the invention and that modifications may be made which are within the scope of the invention which is defined by the claims. In one alternative embodiment the metallic ballast may be an alternative metal to steel, for example it may be any metal having a similar or greater density. The metallic ballast may be provided in an alternative form to steel bars. In one embodiment the metallic ballast may comprise small pieces of scrap metal (e.g. steel), for example small metal discs (or similar shape) that are produced as scrap from the punching of holes in sheet metal. The small pieces may be set in a binder to hold them together, for example cement or a resin binder. Alternatively, they may be placed in containers, e.g. sheet metal troughs. In another alternative arrangement the ballast may comprise irregular shaped pieces of metal. In another embodiment the ballast may comprise small pieces of metal, for example metal shot, metal discs, or the like, mixed with the concrete prior to casting the security barrier.
[0077] It will be appreciated that various changes and modifications can be made to the present invention without departing from the scope of the present application.