Personal care tool for cooling and treating skin
10835447 ยท 2020-11-17
Assignee
Inventors
- Matthew Chateauvert (Harrison, NY, US)
- Heidi Reuter (Old Greenwich, CT, US)
- Joyce Kassouf (New York, NY, US)
- David Wilson (Melville, NY, US)
- Jennifer Palmer Quintano (New York, NY, US)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A handheld massage tool that provides a cooling effect, intended to treat and improve the appearance of the skin, especially of the face.
Claims
1. A handheld cooling tool (10) for drawing thermal energy away from a skin surface, the cooling tool comprising: a hollow, elongated body (1) that has a thermal conductivity less than 0.5 W/m-K, the elongated body having: a proximal end (1a), an opened distal end (1b); and a central longitudinal axis (1c); a metallic applicator head (2) that is retained in and protrudes from the opened distal end (1b) of the body, the applicator head is a single piece, the applicator head having: a skin contact surface (2c) that has a roughness between 0.4 m and 70 m; a slot (2b), and a thermal conductivity greater than 10 W/m-K; and a metallic heat absorbing core (3) that extends from the slot (2b) of the applicator head (2), down into the hollow body (1), the heat absorbing core having: a thermal capacitance of at least 25 J/K; and a mass of 50 g to 150 g; and the heat absorbing core (3) contacts the body (1), wherein an air gap separates the heat absorbing core (3) and the body (1), such that less than 1% of the surface of the heat absorbing core (3) is in contact with the body.
2. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 further comprising a heat conductive adhesive (1e) disposed between the applicator head (2) and the heat absorbing core (3), wherein the heat conductive adhesive has a thermal conductivity of at least 1 W/m-K.
3. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 wherein the heat absorbing core (3) and the applicator head (2) are fashioned as a unitary structure.
4. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 further comprising a gasket (4) situated in between the applicator head (2) and body (1).
5. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 further comprising a spring (5) disposed between the body (1) and the applicator head (2), such that the applicator head is able to move between a first position and a second position relative to the body, while still remaining connected to the body.
6. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 wherein the roughness of the skin contact surface (2c) is between 0.012 m and 2.0 m.
7. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 wherein the skin contact surface (2c) is shaped as a spherical dome ranging from hemi-spherical to something less than hemi-spherical, and a radius of the skin contact surface ranges from 0.5 cm to 30 cm.
8. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 7 wherein the radius of the skin contact surface ranges from 2.0 cm to 30 cm.
9. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 7 wherein the radius of the skin contact surface ranges from 1.0 cm and 2.0 cm.
10. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 7 wherein a position of the applicator head (2) is not symmetric with respect to the central longitudinal axis (1c) of the body (1).
11. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 wherein the center of mass (10e) of the cooling tool is located a distance from an apex (2f) of the skin contact surface (2c) of the applicator head (2) that is between 25% and 50% of the length of the cooling tool.
12. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 wherein the thermal capacity of the combined applicator head (2) and heat absorbing core (3) is 25 J/K to 35 J/K.
13. In combination, a handheld cooling tool (10) according to claim 1 and a charging base (6) for the handheld cooling tool, wherein the proximal end (1a) of the body (1) of the cooling tool is opened, and wherein the charging base comprises: a housing (6a) that houses a metallic heat sink (6b); wherein, at least a portion (6c) of the metallic heat sink (6b) protrudes from the housing (6a) and passes into the proximal end (1a) of the body (1), to contact the heat absorbing core when the cooling tool is reposed in the charging base (6); and wherein the heat sink has a thermal capacity that is at least as large as the thermal capacity of the heat absorbing core (3) of the cooling tool (10).
14. The handheld cooling tool (10) of claim 1 further comprising: a spring (12) disposed between a proximal end (3a) of the heat absorbing core (3) and the proximal end (1a) of the body (1); a first portion (11b) of a flexible enclosure (11) disposed in the slot (2b), between the applicator head (2) and a distal end (3b) of the heat absorbing core (3); a second portion (11c) of the flexible enclosure (11) disposed between the heat absorbing core (3) and the body (1); a fluid (11a) disposed in the flexible enclosure (11); a switch (13) that passes through a wall of the body (1), such that in a first position the switch compress the flexible enclosure (11) and in a second position the flexible enclosure is allowed to relax; wherein, when the flexible enclosure (11) is compressed by the switch (13), some of the fluid (11a) moves into the first portion (11b) of a flexible enclosure, which forces the heat absorbing core to move proximally, compressing the spring (12); and as the switch (13) moves from first position to second position, the spring (12) expands forcing the heat absorbing core to move distally, and moving some of the fluid (11a) into the second portion (11c) of the flexible enclosure (11).
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10) Referring to
(11) The Body
(12) Referring to
(13) The body (1) is a relatively poor conductor of heat. This isolates the user's hand from the applicator head (2), so that the efficiency of the applicator head is not compromised by heat from the user's hand. Specifically, since the body is a poor conductor of heat, the heat that emanates from the hand of a user cannot easily pass through the body and into the heat absorbing core (3) or applicator head, which would decrease the efficiency of the tool by decreasing the heat transfer from the applicator head into the heat absorbing core. Also, as we will see, the body has minimal contact with the applicator head and the heat absorbing core, which further limits the movement of thermal energy. Preferably, the body is fashioned of plastic, such as varieties of polyethylene (PET, PETG, etc.), and not metal. Also, the body will have a low thermal conductivity, which we define as less than about 0.5 W/m-K, to prevent heat transfer from the user's hand. For aesthetic reasons, the body may be clear or opaque.
(14) Applicator Head
(15) Referring to
(16) In some embodiments, the connection between the applicator head (2) and body (1) is rigid and permanent from a consumer-use perspective. This prevents a lose connection between the applicator head and body, which would lead to an inconsistent experience for the consumer. Optionally, however, a resilient component, such as a spring (5; see
(17) The applicator head (2) must have a relatively high thermal capacity and be a good conductor of heat. This will allow for substantial heat transfer away from the skin, and into the heat absorbing core. The thermal conductivity of the applicator head must be large, which we define as greater than about 10 W/m-K. In general, the most efficient applicator head will be of unitary, of single construction. The preferred material for the applicator head is metal, which, through polishing, can be provided with a specified surface finish. In general, a smooth surface is not only more comfortable for the user, but provides the most physical contact between the skin and applicator head. In contrast, a rougher surface would trap air between the skin and applicator, which would decrease heat transfer, since air is a relative poor conductor of heat. However, there are other considerations, so that the temperature at which a user intends to use the tool should be considered when designing the surface finish of the applicator head. For example, at temperatures below the freezing point of water (such as might be found in a consumer freezer), a rougher surface texture is preferred to prevent the metal applicator head from sticking to the facial tissue. In this case, a preferred surface roughness is between 0.4 m and 70 m. While the rougher surface will trap air between the skin and applicator causing a decrease in heat transfer, the very cold temperature of the applicator head will more than make up for that. On the other hand, for warmer temperatures such as 5 C. (as might be found in a consumer refrigerator) up to room temperature, a finer surface texture is preferred to maximize the heat transfer rate, and to provide the user with a comfortable experience. In this case, the preferred surface roughness is between 0.012 m and 2.0 m. Suitable materials for the applicator head include aluminum, brass, copper, cast iron, gold, silver, and steel. A preferred metal is stainless steel, which can accept a high degree of polishing and will resist corrosion.
(18) The shape of the skin contact surface (2c) will also determine how efficiently heat is transferred away from the skin. In general, the more contact between the skin and the skin contact surface, the more quickly heat will be drawn away from the skin, and the temperature of the skin will be lowered. However, consumer comfort is also a factor, and the ability to easily glide the applicator head over the skin. Thus, applicator heads with sharp angles and straight edges should be avoided, as these may scratch the skin, or otherwise be uncomfortable. Therefore, preferred skin contact surfaces are preferably shaped as spherical domes ranging from hemi-spherical (
(19) The domed applicator head (2) is characterized by a radius (2e) and an apex (2f). In general, the radius of the skin contact surface (2c) of the applicator head typically ranges from 0.5 cm to 30 cm. Ideally, an applicator head with a larger radius will be used on the forehead and cheekbones, and an applicator head with a smaller radius will be used around the eyes and nose. For example, in tests, a radius of between about 1.0 cm and 1.5 cm proved useful for under eye treatment, while between 1.1 cm and 1.2 cm proved to be ideal for under eye treatment; small enough to work the tight areas near the canthus of the eye, but large enough to allow coverage of the area in just a few strokes. Even smaller radii proved useful for treating crow's feet where sustained targeted cooling is beneficial. A radius between about 1.0 cm and 2.0 cm was very useful for a full-face application, while a radius greater than about 2.0 cm and up to 30 cm can be used to serve broad, flat areas of the body, like the arms, legs, bottoms of the feet, etc.
(20) Heat Absorbing Core
(21) The heat absorbing core (3) is a metallic mass having a distal end (3b) and a proximal end (3a). The distal end of the heat absorbing core is inserted into the slot (2b) of the applicator head (2), while the proximal end of the heat absorbing core extends down into the hollow body (1). The heat absorbing core is a heat sink, designed to efficiently accept the heat that is coming through the applicator head from that portion of a user's skin that is being treated, but not so efficiently from the hand of a user coming through the body. The heat absorbing core and the applicator head are both metallic. They may be made of the same metal (stainless steel, for example) or different metals. Either way, the heat absorbing core should have a higher thermal capacity than the applicator head, so that heat is continuously drawn away from the user's skin during the intended use of the tool. Thermal capacities of the applicator head and heat absorbing core are determined by the respective thermal capacitances of each member and the mass of each member. In general, the mass of the heat absorbing core is much larger than that of the applicator head, but it is also preferable if the thermal capacitance of the heat absorbing core is equal to or greater than the thermal capacitance of the applicator head. Most preferably, the thermal capacitance of the heat absorbing core is significantly greater than the thermal capacitance of the applicator head. By having both a greater mass and a greater thermal capacitance, the heat absorbing core will efficiently draw heat form the applicator head. In general, the heat absorbing core has a relatively high thermal capacitance; at least 25 J/K and preferably greater. Preferably, the core extends almost the entire length of the interior of the body, which allows the core to be as large as possible, and therefore, a better heat sink. Preferably, the mass of the core is from about 40 g to about 150 g, more preferably, from 50 g to 125 g, and most preferably about 60 g to 100 g.
(22) We can also speak of the thermal capacity of the combined applicator head and heat absorbing core. As a unit, a combined thermal capacity of about 25 to 35 J/K has proven to be very effective when the use time is 4 to 5 minutes for a tool charged in a household refrigerator.
(23) In preferred embodiments, the distance from the applicator head to the center of mass (3e) of the heat absorbing core is as large as possible. This allows the absorbed heat to travel as far away from the applicator head as possible. Therefore, it is preferable if the distance from the applicator head to the center of mass (3e) of the heat absorbing core is at least one-third the of the length of the body (1).
(24) The heat absorbing core (3) may be a cylindrical mass, the distal end (3b) of which is permanently inserted into the slot (2b) in the applicator head (2). The core may be retained in the slot of the applicator head by a friction fit, snap fit or threaded engagement. Alternatively, a heat conductive adhesive (1e) may be disposed between the applicator head and the heat absorbing core. When a heat conductive adhesive is used, it should have a thermal conductivity of at least 1 W/m-K, to ensure adequate overall heat transfer rate. Alternatively, the heat absorbing core and the applicator head may be fashioned as a unitary structure. Alternatively, in some embodiments to be discussed below, the heat absorbing core is moveable with respect to the applicator head, the distal end (3b) of the heat absorbing core being able to slide proximally and distally within the slot (2b) of the applicator head.
(25) It is preferable if the heat absorbing core (3) has minimal contact with the body (1) to limit the amount of heat that is transferred from a user's hand, through the body, and into the core. Therefore, although the heat absorbing core extends the length of the interior of the body, an air gap (1f) separates the two. If it is necessary to add additional support for the heat absorbing core, then there may be minimal contact between the core and the body. Minimal contact means that less than 1% of the surface of the heat absorbing core is in contact with the body. For example,
(26) The cooling tool (10) has an overall length that is measured from the apex (2f) of the skin contact surface (2c) of the applicator head (2) to the proximal end (1a) of the body (1). The cooling tool is significantly heavier than most cosmetic and personal care implements. Therefore, for optimal control by a user, the center of mass (10e) of the cooling tool (10) should be located a distance from the apex of the skin contact surface of the applicator head that is between 25% and 75% of the length of the tool, preferably between 25% and 50% of the length of the tool. For example, if the cooling tool is 10 cm long, then the center of mass will be between 2.5 cm and 7.5 cm from the apex of the skin contact surface, or more preferably, between 2.5 cm and 5.0 cm from the skin contact surface of the applicator head. Or, if the tool is 5 cm long, then the center of mass of the tool will be between 1.25 cm and 3.75 cm from the skin contact surface (2c) of the applicator head, or more preferably, between 1.25 cm and 2.5 cm from the apex of the skin contact surface of the applicator head.
(27) Use
(28) Generally, a personal care tool (10) for cooling and treating skin as described herein, should be chilled before use. Preferably, the tool will be placed in any environment whose ambient temperature is lower than about 15 C., and remain there long enough to equilibrate. More preferably, the ambient temperature is about 5 C.-10 C. Such temperatures are common in household refrigerators. A cooling tool for cooling and treating skin as described herein can also be stored in an environment having an ambient temperature below 0 C., but when the applicator head is that cold, it may be uncomfortable for some users.
(29) Once the applicator head (2) is cooled, a user grasps the body (1) of the tool (10) and contacts the applicator head to the surface of her skin where treatment is desired. This may mean that the applicator head is drawn across the surface of the skin (as depicted in
(30) In development of a personal care cooling tool, as claimed herein, the inventors repeatedly observed that the tool is effective to treat the skin by reducing skin temperature, and that the effect remains for a substantial period of time (more than 5 minutes) after the treatment has ended. The cooling effect not only lasts longer than the cooling effect of a control group, but the magnitude of the effect is also greater than the effect of the control group. The observed effect was definitely attributable to the use of the cooling tool as claimed herein.
(31) Optional Charging Base
(32) As described above, prior to use, the personal care cooling tool is placed in a cold environment, and allowed to equilibrate to the ambient temperature. The length of time for this to happen can be shortened by the use of a charging base, as now described. Referring to
(33) In the embodiment of
(34) When a consumer wants to use the cooling tool, she opens her refrigerator, removes the tool from the charging base, leaving the charging base in the refrigerator. After use, the tool is returned to the charging base, in the refrigerator.
(35) Optional Variable Cooling Rate Control
(36) Optionally, some embodiments of the present invention may comprise a control for adjusting the rate at which the cooling tool cools the skin. The control allows a user to move the heat absorbing core with respect to the applicator head, thereby adjusting the rate of heat transfer from the applicator head to the heat absorbing core. The concept is illustrated in
(37) As shown, a switch (13) passes through the wall of the body (1), and is able to slide longitudinally between a first position and a second position. When moved into the first position, the switch compresses the flexible enclosure (11), and when moved toward second position, the switch allows the flexible enclosure to relax. As the flexible enclosure is compressed by the switch, some of the fluid (11a) moves into the first portion (11b) of a flexible enclosure, which forces the heat absorbing core (3) to move proximally, compressing the spring (12). As a result, less of the distal end (3b) of the heat absorbing core is in the slot (2b) of the applicator head, and the rate of heat transfer from the applicator head to the heat absorbing core is decreased. Thus, the rate of cooling is decreased. This is shown in