Electronic peening intensity sensor

Abstract

A shot peening intensity measurement device has a holder and a test disk formed from a resonant and hardened material. The test disk is held to the holder with a cover that threads onto the holder and clamps the test disk. The holder and test disk form a chamber where a portion of the test disk is unsupported. A measurement device, such as a microphone or other non-contacting device detects vibrations from the test disk when shot or media contacts the test disk.

Claims

1. A shot peening sensor comprising: a holder having a bottom wall with a sidewall extending therefrom, said sidewall terminating at a top surface to form an open top, said top surface having a disk pocket surface recessed from said top surface, said sidewall having threads; a test disk having a thickness defined by a distance between an outwardly facing surface and an inwardly facing surface, said distance being greater than a depth of said disk pocket, said test disk and said holder forming a chamber, said test disk having an unsupported area resonating in response to impacts from shot to said outwardly facing surface; a mounting cover having complimentary threads mating with said threads on said sidewall to clamp said test disk to said holder and overlay said open top, said mounting cover having an aperture to expose a portion of said test disk; and a microphone spaced from said test disk and being held within said chamber, said microphone detecting said resonating of said test disk and generating a signal upon detecting said resonations.

2. The shot peening sensor of claim 1, wherein said microphone is held within an elastomeric isolation member within said holder.

3. The shot peening sensor of claim 1, further comprising an accelerometer affixed to said holder, said accelerometer having an output to subtract from said signal.

4. The shot peening sensor of claim 1, wherein said test disk is formed from a hardened resonant material.

5. The shot peening sensor of claim 4, wherein said test disk is formed from high hardness manganese steel.

6. The shot peening sensor of claim 4, wherein said test disk is formed from high impact resistant glass.

7. A shot peening sensor comprising: a holder having a bottom wall with a sidewall extending therefrom, said sidewall terminating at a top surface to form an open top, said top surface having a disk pocket surface recessed from said top surface, said sidewall having threads; a test disk having a thickness defined by a distance between an outwardly facing surface and an inwardly facing surface, said distance being greater than a depth of said disk pocket, said test disk and said holder forming a chamber, said test disk having an unsupported area resonating in response to impacts from shot to said outwardly facing surface; a mounting cover having complimentary threads mating with said threads on said sidewall to clamp said test disk to said holder and overlay said open top, said mounting cover having an aperture to expose a portion of said test disk; and a Doppler vibrometer spaced from said test disk and being held within said chamber, said vibrometer detecting said resonating of said test disk and generating a signal upon detecting said resonations.

8. The shot peening sensor of claim 7, wherein said vibrometer is held within an elastomeric isolation member within said holder.

9. The shot peening sensor of claim 7, further comprising an accelerometer affixed to said holder, said accelerometer having an output to subtract from said signal.

10. The shot peening sensor of claim 7, wherein said test disk is formed from a hardened resonant material.

11. The shot peening sensor of claim 10, wherein said test disk is formed from high hardness manganese steel.

12. The shot peening sensor of claim 10, wherein said test disk is formed from high impact resistant glass.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) A preferred embodiment of this invention has been chosen wherein:

(2) FIG. 1 is an isometric view of the sensor in use for detecting peening intensity;

(3) FIG. 2 is a section view 2-2 of the sensor in FIG. 1 using a microphone;

(4) FIG. 3 is an exploded view of the sensor shown in FIG. 2;

(5) FIG. 4 shows the operation of the sensor shown in FIG. 2 in use;

(6) FIG. 5 is a section view of the sensor using a laser Doppler vibrometer; and

(7) FIG. 6 is a section view of the sensor using a noise cancellation feedback device.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

(8) A shot peening head 20 dispenses shot 22 for conditioning a surface or component (not shown). In order to determine the intensity of the dispensed shot 22, a peening sensor 10 can be placed in the stream of dispensed shot 22, as shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 2 shows a sectional view of the electronic peening sensor 10 of the present invention. The peening sensor 10 uses a test disk 14 that acts as an acoustic drum head when media impacts the test disk 14. Although the test disk 14 is shown as a round member for convenience of assembly, it is contemplated that other shapes could be used. The media or dispensed shot 22 impacting the test disk 14 produces sound waves that are received at a microphone 16. The microphone 16 is held in a holder 17 and the microphone 16 is located in a sensing chamber 18 within the holder 17. The microphone 16 produces a signal in response to sound it receives and that signal can be analyzed to determine peening intensity.

(9) An optional washer 24 with an aperture 26 is held against the test disk 14 to secure it in place over the sensing chamber 18. The sensing chamber 18 is covered by the test disk 14 being held to the holder 17. The holder 17 has threads 30 for receiving a threaded mounting cover 34 that circumscribes the test disk 14. The mounting cover 34 compresses the washer 24 against the test disk 14 by threading onto the holder 17 with complimentary threads 32. In addition to being the hold-down means of the test disk 14, the mounting cover 34 and washer 24 could have various dimensions for the aperture 26, 52 (inside diameters) which could define the sensitive sensing area so that either more or fewer media impacts are registered. This could be useful at an extremely high media flow rate so the sensor 10 does not experience overload that would result in an inability to distinguish individual media impacts or overall strength.

(10) The test disk 14, acting as an acoustic drum head or diaphragm, is fabricated from a suitable material that reacts to the impact of each media strike and generates a sound pressure wave into the sensing chamber 18. Depending on the type of dispensed shot, the test disk 14 may have different properties. For example, lightweight shot may require a thinner test disk, while heavier shot may require a thicker test disk. To prevent contamination of the media, the test disk 14 may be made from a compatible material to the shot. The test disk 14 has an outwardly facing surface 66 and inwardly facing surface 68 that define its thickness. Materials such as high hardness manganese steel or high impact resistant glass could be employed as the test disk 14. It is important that the test disk 14 (in particular the outwardly facing surface 66) not become affected or have modified properties after being impacted by the dispensed shot 22. If the material properties are changed, the vibrations produced by the test disk 14 will be changed, thereby creating repeatability issues with measuring dispensed shot 22. Detecting the impacts to the test disk 14 are desired since this will produce a sound pressure wave. Since media will also be impacting the mounting cover 34 and the washer 24, additional steps may have to be taken since these vibrations may be transferred to the microphone 16. Attachment of the test disk 14 with a resilient grommet (not shown) could be used to isolate it from vibrations of the holder 17. Additionally, the microphone 16 could be isolated from the holder 17 with a grommet 38 made from a dampening material.

(11) Turning to the details of the mounting cover 34, the cover has a top surface 50 and a central aperture 52 that exposes the washer 24 and test disk 14. To prevent dispensed media 22 that hits the top surface 50 of the mounting cover 34 from getting detected, the mounting cover 34 has a thicker clamping portion 54 that directly aligns the central aperture 52 with the sensing chamber 18. It is contemplated that the mounting cover 43 may be made from a material less likely to transmit vibrations, such as a softer or filled material. It is further contemplated that the cover 34 is coated in a resilient or vibration absorbent material. As previously stated, the mounting cover 34 clamps the test disk 14. The test disk 14 is located in a disk pocket 60 which centers it over the sensing chamber 18. The disk pocket 60 is recessed from a top surface 62 of the holder 17. The test disk 14 is thicker than the depth of the disk pocket 60 in order to focus all of the clamping force generated by the mounting cover 34 on to the test disk 14. By focusing the clamping force, any relative movement or extraneous vibration is reduced or prevented altogether.

(12) The test disk is unsupported over the sensing chamber 18 between the sidewall surfaces 64. This forms an unsupported area 70 where the disk 14 can move slightly with each impact. With the test disk 14 being thinner than any other component that receives impacts from dispensed shot 22, the test disk 14 resonates with each impact, like a drum head. The vibrations of the test disk 14 are transferred through the air in the sensing chamber 18 to the microphone 16. Due to the resonant nature of the test disk, each impact generates a distinctive pulse that is measured by the microphone 16 or other non-contacting sensing device. The greater the energy from the dispensed shot, the greater the amplitude of the test disk vibrations.

(13) As shown in FIG. 5, a laser Doppler vibrometer 40 can be used instead of a microphone. Laser Doppler vibrometers are well-known in the art as capable of measuring movement of a surface by reflecting laser light 42 and measuring the frequency shift of the reflected light. This would be beneficial in an environment subject to considerable noise pollution, extraneous vibration, or any other environment where a microphone would not provide an accurate representative measurement of the peening impact energy. The vibrometer 40 uses the Doppler shift of reflected laser light 42 off of the test disk 14. As the dispensed shot 22 impacts the test disk 14, the vibrations are picked up by the reflected laser light 42 and converted into a signal. The frequency content and amplitude of that signal represent the intensity of the dispensed shot 22.

(14) In an environment where undesirable noise and vibrations are unavoidably transferred to the holder 17, a feedback measurement of the holder vibrations can be used to cancel out undesirable noise. This method to reduce the influence of unwanted signals is to use a noise cancellation technique like is implemented in noise cancelling headphones. An accelerometer 46 could be attached to the holder 17, as shown in FIG. 6, and their output signals could then be subtracted from the microphone or vibrometer signals of the disk vibration with a cancellation circuit 48.

(15) It is understood that while certain aspects of the disclosed subject matter have been shown and described, the disclosed subject matter is not limited thereto and encompasses various other embodiments and aspects. No specific limitation with respect to the specific embodiments disclosed herein is intended or should be inferred. Modifications may be made to the disclosed subject matter as set forth in the following claims.