DETECTION METHOD FOR CONGENERS OF SHORT-CHAIN CHLORINATED PARAFFINS

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a detection method for congeners of short-chain chlorinated paraffins as well as a device for realizing the detection method. The detection method includes the following steps: adding an internal standard substance to a test sample; subjecting the test sample to a separation process using a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph formed by connecting a non-polar or weak-polar column and a medium-polar column in series via a modulator; and detecting the sample by a mass analyzer employing a negative chemical ion source after the separation process. The method according to the present disclosure enables accurate qualitative analysis as well as accurate quantitative measurement for short-chain chlorinated paraffins. The detection is extremely accurate yet can be easily carried out with simple operations.

Claims

1. A detection method for congeners of short-chain chlorinated paraffins, the method comprising following steps: adding an internal standard substance to a test sample; subjecting the test sample to a separation process using a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph formed by connecting a non-polar or weak-polar column and a medium-polar column in series via a modulator; and detecting the sample by a mass analyzer employing a negative chemical ion source after the separation process.

2. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein a stationary phase of the non-polar or weak-polar column is 95% or 100% methylpolysiloxane, and has a thickness of 0.1 to 0.25 m.

3. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein the non-polar or weak-polar column has a length of 15 to 30 m and an inner diameter of 0.22 to 0.32 mm.

4. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein a stationary phase of the medium-polar column is 50% phenylpoly(silphenylene-siloxane), and has a thickness of 0.1 m.

5. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein the medium-polar column has a length of 2.5 to 3 m and an inner diameter of 0.1 to 0.18 mm.

6. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein a procedure for increasing a temperature of the non-polar or weak-polar column includes successive steps of setting the temperature at an initial temperature of 80 C. to 100 C., maintaining the initial temperature for 1 minutes, increasing the temperature to 160 C. at a rate of 30 C./min, maintaining the temperature at 160 C. for 5 minutes, increasing the temperature to 300 C. at a rate of 1.5 C./min, and maintaining the temperature at 300 C. for 2 minutes.

7. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein a procedure for increasing a temperature of the medium-polar column is same as a procedure for increasing a temperature of the non-polar or weak-polar column.

8. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein a temperature of the negative chemical ion source is 120 C. to 200 C.

9. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein a modulation time of the modulator is 8 to 10 seconds.

10. The detection method according to claim 1, wherein the mass analyzer is a quadrupole mass analyzer.

11. A creation method for a calibration curve for short-chain chlorinated paraffins, the method comprising: Step 1, which includes performing a detection process for n test samples (n10) by the detection method according to claim 1 as well as determining a peak volume of each congener and a peak volume of the internal standard substance in each of the test samples; Step 2, which includes calculating a total response factor and a Cl content for each of the test samples by following equations (S1) through (S3):
Relative Total SCCPs Peak Volume=i Relative Peak Volume (Congener i),Equation (S1): where Relative Peak Volume (Congener i)=Peak Volume (Congener i)/Peak Volume (Internal Standard Substance),
Total Response Factor (SCCPs)=Relative Total SCCPs Peak Volume/SCCPs Concentration, andEquation (S2):
CI Content=i [Relative Peak Volume (Congener i)Chlorine Content (Congener i,calculated from the molecular weight)/Relative Total SCCPs Peak Value]; andEquation (S3): Step 3, which includes creating a following calibration curve (S4) for short-chain chlorinated paraffins between the total response factor and the Cl content:
Calibration Curve (S4): Total Response Factor=a(Cl Content)+b.

12. A quantitative calculation method for an SCCPs content in a sample, the method comprising: Step 1, which includes creating a following calibration curve (S4) for short-chain chlorinated paraffins by the creation method according to claim 11:
Calibration Curve (S4): Total Response Factor=a(Cl Content)+b; Step 2, which includes performing a detection process for a test sample by the detection method according to claim 1, and calculating a Cl content in the test sample by following equations (S1) and (S3):
Relative Total SCCPs Peak Volume=i Relative Peak Volume (Congener i),Equation (S1): where Relative Peak Volume (Congener i)=Peak Volume (Congener i)/Peak Volume (Internal Standard Substance),
CI Content=i [Relative Peak Volume (Congener i)Chlorine Content (Congener i,calculated from the molecular weight)/Relative Total SCCPs Peak Value];Equation (S3): Step 3, which includes calculating a total response factor for the test sample by substituting the Cl content in the test sample into the calibration curve (S4); and Step 4, which includes calculating an SCCPs concentration in the test sample by a following equation (S2):
Total Response Factor (SCCPs)=Relative Total SCCPs Peak Volume/SCCPs Concentration.Equation (S2):

13. A calculation method for a relative concentration SCCPs congeners in a sample, the method comprising: Step 1, which includes performing a detection process for a sample by the detection method according to claim 1 and determining a relative feedback by a following equation (S5):
Relative Feedback (Congener i)=Peak Value (Congener i)/Peak Value (Highest Peak among 24 Kinds of Congeners);Equation (S5): Step 2, which includes determining a relative-check ion signal (congener i) by a following equation (S6):
Relative-Check Ion Signal (Congener i)=Relative Feedback (Congener i)/Abundance (Quantitative Ion of Congener i);Equation (S6): Step 3, which includes determining a relative concentration coefficient (congener i) by a following equation (S7):
Relative Concentration Coefficient (Congener i)=Relative-Check Ion Signal (Congener i)/Number of Cl Atoms (Congener i); andEquation (S7): Step 4, which includes determining a relative concentration (congener i) by a following equation (S8):
Relative Concentration (Congener i=Relative Concentration Coefficient (Congener i)/i Relative Concentration Coefficient (Congener i).Equation (S8):

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0034] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

[0035] FIG. 1 shows two-dimensional chromatograms for a C.sub.10 family (a), C.sub.11 family (b), C.sub.12 family (c) and C.sub.13 family (d) of the congeners of SCCPs, where the x axis represents the retention time in the first-dimension (1D) chromatograph and while y-axis represents the retention time in the second-dimension (2D) chromatograph.

[0036] FIG. 2 shows 48 congeners of a SCCPs mixture (a) and MCCPs mixture (b) on two-dimensional chromatograms, which demonstrate (c) an occurrence of mass interference between the C.sub.10H.sub.14Cl.sub.8 congeners derived from the SCCPs and the C.sub.15H.sub.26Cl.sub.6 congeners derived from the MCCPs.

[0037] FIG. 3 shows patterns of the distribution of the SCCPs congeners in air samples (gas phase) 3-1 to 3-9 collected in an urban area.

[0038] FIG. 4 shows a calibration curve for the relationship between the total response factor and the Cl content in SCCPs.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0039] An embodiment of the present invention provides a detection method for congeners of short-chain chlorinated paraffins including the following steps: adding an internal standard substance to a test sample; subjecting the test sample to a separation process by injecting the test sample into a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph formed by connecting a non-polar or weak-polar column and a medium-polar column in series via a modulator; and introducing an eluate from the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph into a mass analyzer employing a negative chemical ion source to detect the sample by the mass analyzer after the separation process.

[0040] An analysis on a test sample is performed by adding an internal standard substance to the test sample and subsequently injecting the test sample into a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph formed by connecting a non-polar or weak-polar column and a medium-polar column in series via a modulator.

[0041] Preparation of Test Samples There is no specific limitation on the method for preparing test samples as long as the method satisfies basic requirements for the analysis by the instrument concerned.

[0042] For example, a sample of commercially available industrial product of CPs can be injected into the instrument for the measurement by being diluted with a solvent. For a sample collected from the air, a pretreatment for obtaining the test sample is required. For example, for the collection of the gas-phase SCCPs, polyurethane foam is used. After the completion of the collection, the internal standard substance is added to the collected gas-phase SCCPs. The obtained mixture is subjected to accelerated solvent extraction, and subsequently, to liquid-liquid extraction. After that, a clean-up process is performed to remove interfering substances, such as the organochlorine agricultural chemicals or polychlorinated biphenyl. Ultimately, SCCPs are eluted and collected to obtain the test sample.

[0043] For the collection of the particle-phase SCCPs, a quartz fiber filter can be used. After the completion of the collection, the internal standard substance is added to the collected particle-phase SCCPs. The obtained mixture is subjected to accelerated solvent extraction, and subsequently, to liquid-liquid extraction. After that, a clean-up process is performed to remove interfering substances, such as the organochlorine agricultural chemicals or polychlorinated biphenyl. Ultimately, SCCPs are eluted and collected to obtain the test sample. There is no specific limitation on the kind of internal standard substance to be added to the test sample. A preferable example is 1,5,5,6,6,10-hexachloridecane.

[0044] Injection Method

[0045] There is no specific limitation on the injection method. For example, an autosampler in a split-less mode may be used for the injection, with an injection volume of 1 L and at an injection temperature of 280 C. It is more preferable to use helium gas as the carrier gas and inject it at a constant linear velocity. The total flow rate is 50 mL/min. The flow rate within the column is 1.2 mL/min. The pressure within the column is 269.8 kPa.

[0046] Non-Polar or Weak-Polar Column (or Faint-Polar Column)

[0047] The separation process for the test sample is performed using the non-polar or weak-polar column as the first-dimension column. In the present method, since the SCCPs in the test sample are low in polarity, the congeners in the SCCPs can be separated by the boiling point (i.e. the length of the carbon chain) by using the non-polar or weak-polar column as the first-dimension column.

[0048] As the stationary phase of the non-polar or weak-polar column, 95% or 100% methylpolysiloxane may be used. An example of the stationary phase is (5% phenyl)-95% methylpolysiloxane.

[0049] The stationary phase of the non-polar or weak-polar column has a thickness of 0.1 to 0.25 m, preferably 0.1 m. The use of the first-dimension column with a stationary phase of 0.1 m in thickness is preferable in that it effectively shortens the analysis time.

[0050] The non-polar or weak-polar column has a column length of 15 to 30 m, and preferably 15 m. The use of the first-dimension column having a column length of 15 m is preferable in that it effectively shortens the analysis time.

[0051] The non-polar or weak-polar column has a diameter of 0.22 to 0.32 mm, and more preferably, 0.25 mm.

[0052] Procedure for Increasing Temperature of Non-Polar or Weak-Polar Column

[0053] There is no specific limitation on the procedure for increasing the temperature of the non-polar or weak-polar column as long as the column peaks can be certainly separated. A preferable procedure includes the successive steps of setting the temperature of the column oven for the first-dimension column at an initial temperature of 80 C. to 100 C., maintaining the initial temperature for 1 minutes, increasing the temperature to 160 C. at a rate of 30 C./min, maintaining the temperature at 160 C. for 5 minutes, increasing the temperature to 300 C. at a rate of 1.5 C./min, and maintaining the temperature at 300 C. for 2 minutes.

[0054] Modulator

[0055] There is no specific limitation on the condition for the modulator as long as the entire amount of eluate from the first-dimension column assuredly flows into the second-dimension column within one modulation time.

[0056] A preferable length of one modulation time is 8 to 10 seconds. A modulation time shorter than 8 seconds does not ensure that the entire amount of eluate flows into the second-dimension column within one modulation time; for example, a compound having a high boiling point or high polarity may partially enter the second-dimension column within the next modulation time. Setting the modulation time within the range of 8 to 10 seconds satisfactorily allows the eluate to entirely flow into the second-dimension column. Accordingly, a modulation time that exceeds 10 seconds is unnecessarily long and unfavorably affects the efficiency of the analysis.

[0057] A preferable range of the modulation temperature is 250 C. to 400 C. In consideration of the temperature resistance of the column as well as the necessity to completely release captured compounds from the modulation loop into the second-dimension column, the modulation temperature should preferably be within a range of 300 C. to 350 C., e.g. 350 C.

[0058] A preferable hot-purge period is 300 ms. A preferable flow rate of the cold-purge gas is 5 L/min

[0059] Medium-Polar Column

[0060] The medium-polar column serving as the second-dimension column further separates the test sample. A commercially available product can be used as the medium-polar column. It should have a higher degree of polarity than weak-polarity columns as well as a lower degree of polarity than strong-polarity columns (or high-polarity columns, such as a column using polyethylene glycol as its stationary phase).

[0061] A preferable stationary phase of the medium-polar column is 50% phenylpoly(silphenylenesiloxane).

[0062] A preferable thickness of the stationary phase of the medium-polar column is 0.1 m. The use of this thickness produces the effects of high-speed separation and concentration.

[0063] The medium-polar column has a column length of 2.5 to 3 m. This second-dimension column includes a 1-m section as the modulator circuit, a 0.5-m section for the connection with the first-dimension column, and a section of 1 to 1.5 m for producing the separating effect. As the second-dimension column, a two-dimensional column which is extremely short, e.g. 2.5 m in length, is used since it is necessary to complete the separation within the modulation time.

[0064] The medium-polar column has a diameter of 0.1 to 0.18 mm A preferable choice is 0.1 mm from the point of view of obtaining a higher level of separation effect.

[0065] Procedure for Increasing Temperature of Medium-Polar Column

[0066] There is no specific limitation on the procedure for increasing the second-dimension column, although it is preferable to use the same procedure as used for the first-dimension column That is to say, it should preferably include the successive steps of setting the temperature of the column oven at an initial temperature of 80 C. to 100 C., maintaining the initial temperature for 1 minutes, increasing the temperature to 160 C. at a rate of 30 C./min, maintaining the temperature at 160 C. for 5 minutes, increasing the temperature to 300 C. at a rate of 1.5 C./min, and maintaining the temperature at 300 C. for 2 minutes. Such a temperature-increasing procedure helps to separate column peaks.

[0067] The eluate from the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph is introduced into a low-resolution mass analyzer which employs a negative chemical ion source and the technique of selective ion monitoring. The low resolution means that the resolution of the masses detected with the mass analyzer is at a level of first or second decimal place. The low-resolution mass analyzer may be a quadrupole mass analyzer. For example, it may be a triple quadrupole mass analyzer.

[0068] Negative Chemical Ion Source

[0069] Negative chemical ion sources have weak ionization power for SCCPs and produce only a small amount of fragment ions. Accordingly, negative chemical ion sources have a satisfactory level of selectivity and sensitivity.

[0070] A preferable reaction gas for the negative chemical ion source is CH.sub.4. The temperature of the negative chemical ion source is within a range of 120 C. to 200 C. In order to achieve both a reduction in the rate of contamination of the ion source and an improvement in ionization efficiency, it is preferable to set the temperature of the negative chemical ion source at 200 C.

[0071] Triple Quadrupole

[0072] The direct and RF voltages in the triple quadrupole are automatically regulated according to the selection of the quantitative ion and the qualitative ion.

[0073] Quantitative Ion and Qualitative Ion

[0074] A detection process for SCCPs standard substances was performed using the detection method for congeners of short-chain chlorinated paraffins according to the embodiment of the present invention. It should be noted that the low-resolution mass analyzer was operated in a full-scan mode for the detection. Among the detected ions of the various kinds of congeners, the ion with the highest abundance was selected as the quantitative ion, while the ion with the second highest abundance was selected as the qualitative ion. The result is shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Family of Congeners Quantative Ion m/z Qualitative Ion m/z C.sub.10H.sub.17Cl.sub.5 279 277 C.sub.10H.sub.16Cl.sub.6 313 315 C.sub.10H.sub.15Cl.sub.7 347 349 C.sub.10H.sub.14Cl.sub.8 381 383 C.sub.10H.sub.13Cl.sub.9 415 417 C.sub.10H.sub.12Cl.sub.10 449 451 C.sub.11H.sub.19Cl.sub.5 293 291 C.sub.11H.sub.18Cl.sub.6 327 329 C.sub.11H.sub.17Cl.sub.7 361 363 C.sub.10H.sub.16Cl.sub.8 395 397 C.sub.11H.sub.15Cl.sub.9 429 431 C.sub.11H.sub.14Cl.sub.10 463 465 C.sub.12H.sub.21Cl.sub.5 307 305 C.sub.12H.sub.20Cl.sub.6 341 343 C.sub.12H.sub.19Cl.sub.7 375 377 C.sub.12H.sub.18Cl.sub.8 409 411 C.sub.12H.sub.17Cl.sub.9 445 443 C.sub.12H.sub.16Cl.sub.10 479 477 C.sub.13H.sub.23Cl.sub.5 319 321 C.sub.13H.sub.22Cl.sub.6 355 357 C.sub.13H.sub.21Cl.sub.7 389 391 C.sub.13H.sub.20Cl.sub.8 423 425 C.sub.13H.sub.19Cl.sub.9 459 457 C.sub.13H.sub.18Cl.sub.10 493 491 Internal Standard 323 321 Substance .sup.13C-1,5,5,6,6,10- hexachloro-n-decane

[0075] Creation of Calibration Curve

[0076] The calibration curve was created as follows:

[0077] (1) The detection process by the detection method according to the embodiment of the present invention was performed for the samples Nos. 1-13 in Table 2 shown below. As a result of the detection, the peak volume of each congener and that of the internal standard substance in each sample were obtained. The samples Nos. 1-13 each had a SCCPs content of 750 ppm.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Cl Content 51.5 52.5 53.5 54.5 55.5 56.3 56.7 57.8 56.0 59.3 60.5 61.5 53.0 (calculated from label of standard substances, %) SCCP Standard 1 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Substance (Cl content, 51.5%) SCCP Standard 0 1 1 3 1 9 1 7 2 1 1 1 0 Substance (Cl content, 55.5%) SCCP Standard 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 2 4 1 Substance (Cl content, 63%)

[0078] (2) The total response factor (Nos. 1-13) and the Cl content (Nos. 1-13) of each sample was calculated by equations (S1) through (S3):

Relative Total SCCPs Peak Volume=i Relative Peak Volume (Congener i),Equation (S1):

where Relative Peak Volume (Congener i)=Peak Volume (Congener i)/Peak Volume (Internal Standard Substance);

Total Response Factor (SCCPs)=Relative Total SCCPs Peak Volume/SCCPs Concentration; andEquation (S2):

CI Content (calculated by chromatogram)=i [Relative Peak Volume (Congener i)Chlorine Content (Congener i,calculated from the molecular weight)/Relative Total SCCPs Peak Value].Equation (S3):

[0079] The Cl contents of the samples Nos. 1-13 obtained by the calculation are shown in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Cl Content 0.585 0.595 0.602 0.604 0.608 0.618 0.636 0.635 0.634 0.641 0.645 0.648 0.651 (calculated from chromatogram)

[0080] (3) The following calibration curve (S4) showing a relationship between the total response factor and the Cl content was calculated:

Calibration Curve (S4): Total Response Factor=a(Cl Content)+b.

[0081] The created calibration curve (S4) is shown in FIG. 4.

[0082] Quantitative Calculation Method for SCCPs Content in Real Samples

[0083] (1) The detection using the detection method according to the embodiment of the present invention was performed for real samples, and the Cl content (real sample) was calculated by equations (S1) and (S3).

[0084] (2) The Cl content (real sample) was substituted into the calibration curve (S4) to calculate the total response factor (real sample).

[0085] (3) The total SCCPs concentration (real sample) in the real sample was calculated by equation (S2).

[0086] Quantitative Calculation Method for Relative Concentration of Congener

[0087] (1) The detection using the detection method according to the embodiment of the present invention was performed for real samples, and the relative feedback was calculated by the following equation (S5).

Relative Feedback (Congener i)=Peak Value (Congener i)/Peak Value (Highest Peak among 24 Kinds of Congeners).Equation (S5):

[0088] (2) A relative-check ion signal (congener i) was calculated by the following equation (S6). The abundance of the quantitative ion of the congener is shown in Table 4.

Relative-Check Ion Signal (Congener i)=Relative Feedback (Congener i)/Abundance (Quantitative Ion of Congener i)Equation (S6):

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Family of Congeners Quantitative Ion m/z Abundance (%) C.sub.10H.sub.17Cl.sub.5 279 36.9 C.sub.10H.sub.16Cl.sub.6 313 38.2 C.sub.10H.sub.15Cl.sub.7 347 34.0 C.sub.10H.sub.14Cl.sub.8 381 27.9 C.sub.10H.sub.13Cl.sub.9 415 27.4 C.sub.10H.sub.12Cl.sub.10 449 21.5 C.sub.11H.sub.19Cl.sub.5 293 39.4 C.sub.11H.sub.18Cl.sub.6 327 38.7 C.sub.11H.sub.17Cl.sub.7 361 35.7 C.sub.11H.sub.16Cl.sub.8 395 30.8 C.sub.11H.sub.15Cl.sub.9 429 27.8 C.sub.11H.sub.14Cl.sub.10 463 29.1 C.sub.12H.sub.21Cl.sub.5 307 28.6 C.sub.12H.sub.20Cl.sub.6 341 36.8 C.sub.12H.sub.19Cl.sub.7 375 34.7 C.sub.12H.sub.18Cl.sub.8 409 30.4 C.sub.12H.sub.17Cl.sub.9 445 29.5 C.sub.12H.sub.16Cl.sub.10 479 28.8 C.sub.13H.sub.23Cl.sub.5 319 26.4 C.sub.13H.sub.22Cl.sub.6 355 29.8 C.sub.13H.sub.21Cl.sub.7 389 30.8 C.sub.13H.sub.20Cl.sub.8 423 28.9 C.sub.13H.sub.19Cl.sub.9 459 30.4 C.sub.13H.sub.18Cl.sub.10 493 25.3

[0089] (3) The relative concentration coefficient (congener i) was calculated by the following equation (S7).

Relative Concentration Coefficient (Congener i)=Relative-Check Ion Signal (Congener i)/Number of Cl Atoms (Congener i)Equation (S7):

[0090] (4) The relative concentration (congener i) was calculated by the following equation (S8).

Relative Concentration (Congener i [%])=Relative Concentration Coefficient (Congener i)/i Relative Concentration Coefficient (Congener i)Equation (S8):

First Example

[0091] Test Samples

[0092] Commercially available C.sub.10 mixture, C.sub.11 mixture, C.sub.12 mixture and C.sub.13 mixture (manufactured by Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH, Germany) were used as test samples 1-1. .sup.13C-1,5,5,6,6,10-hexachloro-n-decane was used as the internal standard substance.

[0093] C.sub.10 mixture: Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 10 ng/L. The chlorine content was 65.02 wt %.

[0094] C.sub.11 mixture: This sample was prepared by mixing two kinds of C.sub.11 mixtures, which respectively had chlorine contents of 45.5 wt % and 65.25 wt %, at a volume ratio of 1:1. Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 10 ng/L.

[0095] C.sub.12 mixture: This sample was prepared by mixing two kinds of C.sub.12 mixtures, which respectively had chlorine contents of 55 wt % and 69.98 wt %, at a volume ratio of 1:1. Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 10 ng/L.

[0096] C.sub.13 mixture: This sample was prepared by mixing two kinds of C.sub.13 mixtures, which respectively had chlorine contents of 55.03 wt % and 65.18 wt %, at a volume ratio of 1:1. Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 10 ng/L.

[0097] Instrumental Configuration

[0098] Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph: GCGC capillary columns connected via a thermal modulator (manufactured by Zoex, USA) were used for the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatograph. The first-dimension column was a non-polar column having a stationary phase composed of 5% phenyl and 95% methylpolysiloxane. The film thickness of the stationary phase was 0.1 m. The column was 0.25 mm in diameter and 15 m in length (InertCap 5MS/Sil capillary column, manufactured by GL Sciences Inc., Japan).

[0099] The second-dimension column was a medium-polar column. The stationary phase was 50% phenylpoly(silphenylenesiloxane). The film thickness of the stationary phase was 0.1 m. The column was 0.1 mm in diameter and 2.5 m in length (manufactured by SGE analytical science, Australia).

[0100] The procedure for increasing the temperature of the first-dimension column included the successive steps of setting the temperature at an initial temperature of 80 C. to 100 C., maintaining the initial temperature for 1 minutes, increasing the temperature to 160 C. at a rate of 30 C./min, maintaining the temperature at 160 C. for 5 minutes, increasing the temperature to 300 C. at a rate of 1.5 C./min, and maintaining the temperature at 300 C. for 2 minutes.

[0101] The procedure for increasing the temperature of the second-dimension column was the same as the procedure used for increasing the temperature of the first-dimension column.

[0102] Helium gas was used as the carrier gas and injected at a constant linear velocity.

[0103] The modulation time of the modulator was 10 seconds. The hot-purge time at 350 C. was 300 ms. The flow rate for the cold purge was 5 L/min.

[0104] Low-resolution mass analyzer: A triple-quadrupole low-resolution mass analyzer was used. A negative chemical ion source (NCI) was adopted. The temperature of the ion source was set at 200 C. The analysis was performed in a selective ion monitoring mode, using methane as the reaction gas.

[0105] The result is shown in FIG. 1. A satisfactory level of separation effect was obtained for the 24 kinds of congeners in the SCCPs.

Comparative Example

[0106] In the comparative example, the test samples and instrumental configuration were the same as in the first example except for the differences which will be hereinafter described.

[0107] The first-dimension column was a medium-polar column having a stationary phase composed of 50% phenyl and 50% methylpolysiloxane. The film thickness of the stationary phase was 0.25 m. The column was 0.25 mm in diameter and 15 m in length (InertCap 17MS capillary column, manufactured by GL Sciences Inc., Japan).

[0108] The second-dimension column was a non-polar column. The stationary phase was 100% dimethylpolysiloxane. The film thickness of the stationary phase was 0.1 m. The column was 0.1 mm in diameter and 2.5 m in length (BPX-1, manufactured by SGE analytical science, Australia). The separation effect for the 24 kinds of congeners in the SCCPs in the comparative example was low, so that some of the congeners were missed.

Second Example

[0109] Test Samples

[0110] Three kinds of commercially available C.sub.10-C.sub.13 mixtures (Nos. 1-3) were mixed at a volume ratio of 1:1:1 to obtain a test sample 2-1. .sup.13C-1,5,5,6,6,10-hexachloro-n-decane was used as the internal standard substance.

[0111] C.sub.10-C.sub.13 mixture (No. 1): Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 100 ng/L. The chlorine content was 51.5 wt %.

[0112] C.sub.10-C.sub.13 mixture (No. 2): Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 100 ng/L. The chlorine content was 55.5 wt %.

[0113] Cm-CD mixture (No. 3): Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 100 ng/L. The chlorine content was 63 wt %.

[0114] Three kinds of commercially available C.sub.14-C.sub.17 mixtures (Nos. 4-6) were mixed at a volume ratio of 1:1:1 to obtain a test sample 2-2. .sup.13C-1,5,5,6,6,10-hexachloro-n-decane was used as the internal standard substance.

[0115] C.sub.14-C.sub.17 mixture (No. 4): Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 100 ng/L. The chlorine content was 42 wt %.

[0116] C.sub.14-C.sub.17 mixture (No. 5): Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 100 ng/L. The chlorine content was 52 wt %.

[0117] C.sub.14-C.sub.17 mixture (No. 6): Cyclohexane was used as the solvent. The solubility was 100 ng/L. The chlorine content was had a chlorine content of 57 wt %.

[0118] The instrumental configuration was the same as in the first example. The result is shown in FIG. 2.

[0119] If one-dimensional gas chromatography low-resolution mass spectrometry is solely used, mass interference occurs between the [MCl].sup. ion group of the SCCPs congeners and that of the MCCPs congeners which have five more carbon atoms and two less chlorine atoms than the SCCPs congeners. For example, if both C.sub.10H.sub.14Cl.sub.8 and C.sub.15H.sub.26Cl.sub.6 are present, mass interference occurs, which makes it impossible to distinguish between the two compounds. Such an interference can be resolved by the detection method according to the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2. SCCPs mixtures can be completely separated from MCCPs mixtures.

Third Example

[0120] Preparation of Test Samples

[0121] Air samples were collected with a high-volume air sampler (HV-1000 F, manufactured by SIBATA SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY LTD.) placed on a roof of a building (at a height of approximately 30 meters from the ground). The high-volume air sampler was operated at a flow rate of 700 L/min. The sampling period was 24 hours. The sampling was continued for nine days to obtain nine corresponding samples, which were labeled as 3-1 to 3-9.

[0122] For the gas-phase SCCPs, polyurethane foam was used for the collection. After the completion of the collection, the internal standard substance (.sup.13C-1,5,5,6,6,10-hexachloro-n-decane) was added to the collected gas-phase SCCPs. The polyurethane foam was subsequently subjected to accelerated solvent extraction using n-hexane/dichloromethane mixed at 1:1. Next, liquid-liquid extraction was performed, in which organic substances were almost entirely removed by sulfuric acid. Then, a clean-up process for removing interfering substances, such as the organochlorine agricultural chemicals or polychlorinated biphenyl, was performed using a multilayer silica gel column Ultimately, the multilayer silica gel column was rinsed with 80 mL of n-hexane, and SCCPs were eluted with n-hexane/dichloromethane mixed at a ratio of 8:2. The collected eluate was condensed to 200 m to obtain a test sample.

[0123] For the particle-phase SCCPs, a quartz fiber filter was used for the collection. After the completion of the collection, the internal standard substance (.sup.13C-1,5,5,6,6,10-hexachloro-n-decane) was added to the collected particle-phase SCCPs. The quartz fiber filter was subsequently subjected to accelerated solvent extraction using n-hexane/dichloromethane mixed at 1:1. Next, liquid-liquid extraction was performed, in which organic substances were almost entirely removed by sulfuric acid. Then, a clean-up process for removing interfering substances, such as the organochlorine agricultural chemicals or polychlorinated biphenyl, was performed using a multilayer silica gel column Ultimately, the multilayer silica gel column was rinsed with 80 mL of n-hexane, and SCCPs were eluted with n-hexane/dichloromethane mixed at a ratio of 8:2. The collected eluate was condensed to 200 m to obtain a test sample.

[0124] An analysis was performed using the same instrumental configuration as in the first example, and a calculation was performed by a calculation method which is commonly known in the technical area to which the present invention pertains (e.g. a calculation method described in Non Patent Literature 1). The result is shown in FIG. 3.

[0125] As demonstrated in FIG. 3, the detection method according to the embodiment of the present invention enables the detection of the 24 kinds of congeners of the SCCPs in the air with a high level of detection accuracy that allows for quantitative measurements.