Method for preparing recombinant adeno-associated virus

Abstract

A method for producing recombinant adeno-associated virus, the method including: (1) transforming a gene of interest (GOI) into a recombinant baculovirus, where the recombinant baculovirus has a genome integrated with AAV Rep gene, Cap gene, and rAAV genome ITR-GOI that are needed in the production of the rAAV; and where the ITR-GOI is linked to expression cassette of the Cap gene and the Rep gene by a 5 terminal nucleic acid segment or a 3 terminal nucleic acid segment; (2) infecting host insect larvae with the recombinant baculovirus prepared in (1), such that the rAAV is produced in vivo in the host insect larvae; and (3) lysing the host insect larvae obtained in (2), and extracting and purifying the rAAV.

Claims

1. A method for producing recombinant adeno-associated virus, the method comprising: (1) transforming a gene of interest (GOI) into a recombinant baculovirus, wherein the recombinant baculovirus has a genome integrated with AAV Rep gene, Cap gene, and rAAV genome ITR-GOI; and the ITR-GOI is linked to expression cassette of the Cap gene and the Rep gene by a 5 terminal nucleic acid segment or a 3 terminal nucleic acid segment of the ITR-GOI; and the 5 terminal nucleic acid segment or the 3 terminal nucleic acid segment is a ligation nucleic acid sequence having a length ranging from 80 to 140 bp; (2) infecting host insect larvae with the recombinant baculovirus prepared in (1) to produce the rAAV in vivo in the host insect larvae; and (3) lysing the host insect larvae obtained in (2), and extracting and purifying the rAAV, wherein the infecting host insect larvae with the recombinant baculovirus prepared in (1) to produce the rAAV in vivo in the host insect larvae comprises: (2-1-1): feeding hatched host insect larvae to between a 4th instar stage and a 5th instar stage; (2-1-2): inoculating the host insect larvae obtained in (2-1-1) by subcutaneously injecting 10-20 L, of the recombinant baculovirus at a titer of 110.sup.7 VG/mL to 110.sup.9 VG/mL prepared in (1); and (2-1-3): feeding the host insect larvae injected with the recombinant baculovirus obtained in (2-1-2) until the larvae have the symptoms of appetite loss, sluggish movement, and swollen somite, and then stopping feeding, and harvesting the larvae.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein in (2-1-3), the feeding is stopped when the symptoms occur in 3 to 7 days after the host insect larvae are infected with the recombinant baculovirus.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the recombinant baculovirus includes part of genome sequence of Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV) (Genbank accession No.: KM667940.1 or NC_001623.1) or Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) (Genbank accession No.: L33180.1).

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the host insect larvae are larvae of beet armyworm or silkworm.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein in (3), the lysing of the host insect larvae comprises: mashing and grinding the host insect larvae, adding a PBS solution, homogenizing, freezing, and then thawing, to prepare the lysate.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein in (3), the step of extracting and purifying the rAAV comprises: centrifuging the lysate after the host insect larvae is lysed, collecting the supernatant, and extracting with chloroform, to obtain a preliminarily purified rAAV.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for producing a rAAV provided in the disclosure;

(2) FIG. 2A shows a principle of packaging rAAV, a schematic structural view of a shuttle plasmid FIG. 2B shows pFast. Bac. Dual (pFBD) in a baculovirus expression system (Bac to Bac), and FIG. 2C shows a schematic structural view of a recombinant shuttle plasmid pFBD/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep integrated with components essential for the production of the rAAV;

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing a process for producing rAAV by infecting host insect cells or host insect larvae with a recombinant baculovirus in an example;

(4) FIG. 4A is fluorescence microscopic images of Sf9 cells in Example 1 infected with the recombinant baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep;

(5) FIG. 4B is fluorescence microscopic images of HEK293 and Sf9 cells infected with the rAAV produced in Example 1;

(6) FIG. 5 shows morphologies of normal beet armyworm larvae and beet armyworm larvae having obvious pathological changes after infection with a recombinant baculovirus in Example 1;

(7) FIG. 6A is fluorescence microscopic images of HEK293 and Sf9 cells infected with a larvae lysate supernatant in Example 1;

(8) FIG. 6B is fluorescence microscopic images of HEK293 cells infected with a larvae lysate supernatant purified by extraction with chloroform in Example 1;

(9) FIG. 7A is fluorescence microscopic images of BmN cells infected with the recombinant baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep in Example 2;

(10) FIG. 7B is fluorescence microscopic images of HEK293 and BmN cells infected with the rAAV produced in Example 2;

(11) FIG. 8 shows morphologies of normal silkworm larvae and silkworm larvae having obvious pathological changes after infection with a recombinant baculovirus in Example 2; and

(12) FIG. 9A is fluorescence microscopic images of HEK293 and BmN cells infected with a larvae lysate supernatant in Example 2; and

(13) FIG. 9B is fluorescence microscopic images of HEK293 cells infected with a larvae lysate supernatant purified by extraction with chloroform in Example 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(14) The invention is described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

(15) Insects are natural hosts of baculoviruses. However, the existing methods for large-scale production of rAAV by using a baculovirus system all rely on infection of specific insect cell lines cultured in vitro. Compared with the in vitro culturing of insect cells, the feeding of insect larvae has the following uncomparable advantages. The apparatus is simple, and can be easily promoted, the cost is low, the product has a high biological activity, and the production system is a natural bioreactor and has a large output. To date, no method has been developed for rAAV production by infecting insect larvae with a recombinant baculovirus. The reason is that the existing methods for producing rAAV by using a baculovirus system have the defects that are hard to overcome. In the existing Three-Bac system or Two-Bac system, since the co-infection of single insect cells with multiple recombinant baculoviruses is an inefficient random events, and the infection of insect larvae will be more uncontrollable than in vitro cultured insect cells, the efficient rAAV production cannot be achieved. In the existing One-Bac system that based on packaging cell line infected to induce the expression of the AAV Rep and Cap genes, although the construction of the packaging cell line integrated the Rep gene and Cap gene is feasible, it is difficult to construct transgenic insect larvae that similarly inducibly expresses the Rep and Cap genes. There is no reported use of a recombinant baculovirus to infect insect larvae to produce rAAV. The development of a novel One Bac system independent of a packaging cell line for rAAV production is a key prerequisite for large scale production of rAAV by infecting insect larvae with a recombinant baculovirus, as shown in FIG. 3.

(16) Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV) or Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) is preferred.

(17) AcMNPV is a baculovirus that cross-infects more than 30 kinds of lepidopteran insects. Due to the specificity in infection of the hosts, AcMNPV is infectious to beet armyworm, but not silkworm. Since beet armyworm is widely distributed in the wild and can be easily fed artificially, it is one of the most commonly used host insects to study AcMNPV infection in insects (PLoS One. 2012; 7 (7): e42462). The AcMNPV-based baculovirus expression system is a baculovirus expression system that is developed earliest and most widely used (Biotechnol J. 2015 May; 10 (5): 702-14).

(18) BmNPV is infectious to only a small range of hosts, and can infect silkworm, but not beet armyworm. Silkworm is an important economic insect. It is of a long history of thousands of years in the world to rear mulberry silkworm to produce silk and silk fabric in traditional agriculture. The BmNPV-based silkworm-baculovirus expression system has also become a widely used foreign protein expression system (ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol. 2010 January; 85(3):459-70).

(19) The development of a new method for large-scale production of rAAV by infecting insect larvae with a recombinant baculovirus will provide a potential cost-efficient platform for the production of rAAV, one of the major viral vectors for gene therapy; and promote the fusion development of the gene therapy industry in the biomedicine economy and the insect growing industry in the traditional agricultural economy.

(20) The disclosure provides a method for producing rAAV, which comprises the following steps, as shown in FIG. 1:

(21) (1) A gene of interest (GOI) is transformed into a recombinant baculovirus, where the recombinant baculovirus has a genome integrated with AAV Rep gene, Cap gene, and rAAV genome ITR-GOI.

(22) The recombinant baculovirus is preferably based on the AcMNPV clone E2 (having a genome sequence deposited under Genbank accession No.: KM667940.1, Journal of virology, August 1993, p. 4566-4579), the AcMNPV clone C6 (having a genome sequence deposited under Genbank accession No.: NC_001623.1) or the BmNPV isolate T3 (having a genome sequence deposited under Genbank accession No.: L33180.1, Virologica sinica, June 2007, 22 (3): 0218-225), and integrated with a Rep gene, a Cap gene, and ITR-GOI, where the Rep gene and the Cap gene are preferably codon-optimized according to the principle of ribosomal leaky scanning.

(23) The ITR-GOI includes an inverted terminal repeat (ITR) of the AAV genome at two ends and a gene of interest (GOI) carried in the middle portion, where the ITR-GOI is linked to an expression cassette of the Cap gene and the Rep gene by a 5 terminal nucleic acid segment or a 3 terminal nucleic acid segment. The Rep gene and the Cap gene are located upstream or downstream of the ITR-GOI.

(24) The Rep gene is codon optimized according to the principle of ribosomal leaky scanning. An mRNA is transcripted by using a polyhedron (PH) promoter, to achieve the functional expression of Rep72 and Rep52 replication proteins. The sequence of the Rep gene is preferably as shown in SEQ ID No.: 1.

(25) The Cap gene is also codon optimized according to the principle of ribosomal leaky scanning. An mRNA is transcripted by using a P10 promoter, to achieve the functional expression of capsid proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 at an approximately natural ratio (1:1:10). The sequence of the Cap gene is preferably as shown in SEQ ID No.: 2.

(26) The ITR-GOI is linked to an expression cassette of the Cap gene and the Rep gene by the ligation nucleic acid segments at two ends. ITR is an inverted terminal repeat (ITR) of the AAV genome, and preferable an ITR of AAV serotype 2, as shown in SEQ ID No.: 3. The 5 terminal or 3 terminal nucleic acid sequence is preferably a ligation nucleic acid sequence having a length ranging from 80 to 140 bp, as shown in SEQ ID No.: 4 or SEQ ID No.: 5. The ITR-GOI core expression element is a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene expression cassette comprising a CMV promoter, a GFP gene, and a ployA (PA) component in the example, so as to facilitate the confirmation of the technical solution.

(27) A combination of solutions for integrating the Rep gene, the Cap gene and the ITR-GOI into the baculovirus genome is as shown in FIG. 2C.

(28) The recombinant baculovirus (preferably based on AcMNPV or BmNPV) provided in the disclosure can be prepared through a method comprising:

(29) A. obtaining codon-optimized Rep gene and Cap gene by artificial gene synthesis; and obtaining an ITR-GOI by conventional molecular cloning techniques;

(30) B. constructing the Rep gene, the Cap gene and the ITR-GOI obtained in Step A onto a shuttle plasmid pFast. Bac. Dual (pFBD) (as shown in FIG. 2B) by molecular cloning, and transfecting corresponding host Sf9 cells or BmN cells with the recombinant baculovirus genome according to the operation process of a Bac to Bac system, to obtain a corresponding recombinant baculovirus.

(31) The genomic DNA of rAAV vector contains exogenous gene of interest which replaces the AAV coding gene and the ITR sequences which is required for virus replication and packaging. The Rep gene and the Cap gene and helper virus functions were supplied by trans-compensation for the production of rAAV, as shown in FIG. 2A.

(32) (2) Host insect larvae are infected with the recombinant baculovirus prepared in Step (1), such that the rAAV is produced in a large amount in vivo in the host insect larvae. The infection is carried out by subcutaneous injection, and comprises specifically the following steps:

(33) (2-1-1): feeding hatched host insect larvae to 4-5th instar larvae in a clean culture chamber with suitable temperature and humidity;

(34) (2-1-2): inoculating the 4-5th instar host insect larvae by subcutaneously injecting the prepared recombinant baculovirus at a suitable virus dosage; and

(35) (2-1-3): feeding the host insect larvae infected with the recombinant baculovirus to allow the replication and multiplication of the virus in the larvae, until the larvae have the typical symptoms of appetite loss, slow movement, swollen somite after the virus is replicated in a large amount and generally within 3-7 days after injection, then stopping feeding, and harvesting the larvae.

(36) (3) The insect larvae obtained in Step (2) are lysed, and the recombinant adeno-associated virus is extracted and purified.

(37) The collected insect larvae are mashed and ground, added with a PBS solution, and homogenized, followed by 3 rounds of repeated freezing and thawing. After centrifugation for 10 min at 5000 rpm, the larvae lysate supernatant is collected, and extracted with chloroform, to obtain a preliminarily purified rAAV.

Example 1 Production of rAAV by Infecting Beet Armyworm Larvae with Recombinant Baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep

(38) (1) Construction of Recombinant Baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep and Verification of Virus Activity

(39) For the purpose of integrating the three main components essential for rAAV producing, that is, the AAV Cap gene, Rep gene, and the rAAV genome ITR-GOI into single recombinant baculovirus, a shuttle plasmid pFast. Bac. Dual (pFBD) in a Bac to Bac baculovirus expression system was used. In the example, the Rep gene based on AAV serotype 2 was codon optimized according to the principle of ribosomal leaky scanning, and the Rep gene was under the control of a PH promoter, so as to achieve the functional expression of Rep72 and Rep52 replication proteins. The Rep gene had a sequence as shown in SEQ ID No.: 1. In the example, the Cap gene based on AAV serotype 2 was codon optimized according to the principle of ribosomal leaky scanning, and the Cap gene was under the control of a P10 promoter, so as to achieve the functional expression of capsid proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 at an approximately natural ratio (1:1:10). The Cap gene had a sequence as shown in SEQ ID No.: 2. In the ITR-GOI in the example, ITR was an ITR sequence of AAV serotype 2, that is, the sequence as shown in SEQ ID No.: 3, and the core expression element of ITR-GOI was an expression cassette of green fluorescent protein (GFP), where the GFP expression was controlled by a CMV promoter, for facilitating the detection of the rAAV activity. The ITR-GOI was linked to expression cassette of the Rep gene and the Cap gene by a 5 terminal nucleic acid segment and a 3 terminal nucleic acid segment. The 5 terminal or 3 terminal nucleic acid segment was a sequence as shown in SEQ ID No.: 4 (link A) or SEQ ID No.: 5 (link B).

(40) In this example, a combination of choices of the main components in the recombinant baculovirus was as follows;

(41) Cap-LinkA-(ITR-GFP)-linkB-Rep

(42) A recombinant shuttle plasmid pFBD/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep was constructed by placing the ITR-GFP between the P10 promoter and PH promoter of the pFBD vector via a ligation nucleic acid fragment using conventional molecular cloning techniques, as shown in FIG. 2C.

(43) The P10 has the following sequence:

(44) TABLE-US-00001 (SEQIDNo.:6) ATACGGACCTTTAATTCAACCCAACACAATATATTATAGTTAAATAA GAATTATTATCAAATCATTTGTATATTAATTAAAATACTATACTGTA AATTACATTTTATTTACAATCACTCGAC;

(45) The PH promoter has the following sequence:

(46) TABLE-US-00002 (SEQIDNo.:7) ATCATGGAGATAATTAAAATGATAACCATCTCGCAAATAAATAAGTA TTTTACTGTTTTCGTAACAGTTTTGTAATAAAAAAACCTATAAATAT TCCGGATTATTCATACCGTCCCACCATCGGGCGC;

(47) The intermediate fragment there between has the following sequence:

(48) TABLE-US-00003 (SEQIDNo.:8) ACTCCGGAATATTAATAG.

(49) The recombinant shuttle plasmid was transformed into AcDH10Bac containing the AcMNPV baculovirus genome according to the Bac-to-Bac system protocol. Recombinant baculovirus genome (Bacmid) was obtained by Tn7 transposon element-mediated recombination. Positive bacteria containing recombinant Bacmid were obtained by blue-white screening and PCR identification. Recombinant Bacmid was extracted and purified and transfected into adherently cultured Sf9 cells. Sf9 cells were completely infected with recombinant baculovirus and showed obvious cytopathic effect (CPE). The cell culture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and the resulting recombinant baculovirus (BEV) was contained in the supernatant.

(50) Sf9 cells in adherent culture were infected with the supernatant, and then cultured for 3 days. It was observed that the non-infected Sf9 cells in the control group grew normally, and no GFP was expressed. In contrast, in the test group, obvious cytopathogenic effect (CPE) occurred to the Sf9 cells infected with BEV, and GFP expression was obvious, as shown in FIG. 4A. This suggested that the BEV was successfully produced through the above scheme. BEV produced by transfected Sf9 cells was used to infect Sf9 cells adherently cultured or suspension cultured Sf9 cells, and the infected Sf9 cells showed CPE after 3 days; then the cell culture fluid was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and the BEV supernatant was obtained. The titer of the BEV was determined by the method of Fluorescent Quantitative PCR. See, ProcNatlAcadSci USA, 2009. 106 (13): 5059-64.

(51) The cultured Sf9 cells were infected with the BEV produced in Example 1 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5. Three days after infection, the culture supernatant and cells were collected separately. The BEV was mainly secreted and released into the culture supernatant, and some un-released BEV was also present in Sf9 cells. The rAAV was mainly present in the cell nucleus. Since CPE occurred after the insect cells were infected and some cells were lysed, rAAV was also partly released into the supernatant. Therefore, BEV and rAAV were present in both the supernatant and the cells.

(52) To verify that active rAAV was produced by infecting Sf9 cells with the recombinant baculovirus, the production of rAAV with the system was experimentally confirmed by HEK293 cells and Sf9 cells based infection assays. The experimental results are shown in FIG. 4B. The detailed process and the results are as follows: The cell pellet was frozen and thawed three times for lysis, then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min and supernatant of cell lysis was collected. Because rAAV was non-enveloped, its activity was not affected by heating at 60 C. for 30 minutes, whereas recombinant baculovirus (BEV) was enveloped and lost its activity after treatment at 60 C. for 30 minutes. A simple infection-based method was used to test the rAAV activity (FIG. 4B). For rAAV2 (293 cells derived) samples, in 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP. In Sf9 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated cannot express GFP, it indicates that rAAV2 do not infect Sf9 cells. For BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep supernatant samples, which contain the major secreted BEV and some rAAV. In 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP, while the GFP expression of the treated decrease significantly, because inactive BEV do not express GFP and only some rAAV can express GFP. In Sf9 cells-based infection assays, the untreated can express GFP, but the treated cannot express GFP. For BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep infected Sf9 cells lysate supernatant samples, which contain some non-secret BEVs and the major rAAV. In 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP, but GFP expression of the treated decrease slightly. It indicates that there is large amount of rAAVs expressing GFP. In Sf9 cells-based infection assays, the untreated can express GFP, while the treated cannot express GFP (FIG. 4B).

(53) The results shown in FIGS. 4A-4B indicate that rAAV can be produced by infecting Sf9 cells with the recombinant baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep.

(54) (2) Production of rAAV by Infecting Beet Armyworm Larvae with Recombinant Baculovirus (BEV)

(55) Hatched beet armyworm larvae were fed to 4-5th instar larvae. The larvae were anesthetized on ice, and inoculated by subcutaneously injecting about 10 L recombinant baculovirus (with a BEV titer of about 110.sup.9VG/mL) using a micro-syringe. Then, the larvae were cultured in a culture dish with a lid, and fed for additional 3-4 days. The infected host larvae had obvious pathologic symptom changes, such as appetite loss, slow movement, and swollen somite. The un-infected beet armyworm larvae grew normally (as shown in FIG. 5).

(56) (3) Lysis of Larvae, Purification and Activity Verification of rAAV

(57) The collected larvae were mashed and ground, added with a PBS solution, and homogenized, followed by 3 rounds of repeated freezing and thawing. After centrifugation for 10 min at 5000 rpm, the larvae lysate supernatant was collected. After the beet armyworm larvae were infected with BEV, rAAV was produced in the larvae cells while BEV was multiplied. Both BEV and rAAV were present in the larvae lysate supernatant.

(58) To verify that rAAV was produced by infecting beet armyworm larvae by injecting the recombinant baculovirus, the production of rAAV was experimentally confirmed by HEK293 cells and Sf9 cells based infection assays. The experimental results are shown in FIGS. 6A-6B. Given the fact that rAAV was non-enveloped, and the activity was not affected after 30 min-treatment at 60 C.; and the recombinant baculovirus (BEV) was enveloped, and deactivated after 30 min-treatment at 60 C., the specific implementation process and the result analysis were as follows.

(59) For the crude uninfected larvae lysate supernatant samples, in both 293 and Sf9 cells-based infection assays, there are no GFP expression (FIG. 6A). For the crude infected larvae lysate supernatant samples, in 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP, but GFP expression of the treated decrease slightly. It indicates that there is large amount of rAAVs expressing GFP. In Sf9 cells-based infection assays, the untreated can express GFP, but the treated cannot express GFP (FIG. 6A).

(60) Similar to the difference in thermo-stability, the differences in chloroform tolerance between enveloped BEV and non-enveloped AAV allowed the specific inactivation of BEV by chloroform extraction treatment. The crude larvae lysate supernatant samples were subject to chloroform extraction for 3 times. In 293 cells-based infection assays, the infected samples can express GFP, and the uninfected cannot express GFP. This result suggests that the infected samples contain rAAV tolerable for chloroform extraction treatment (FIG. 6B). The above results showed that active rAAV was successfully prepared by infecting beet armyworm larvae with the recombinant baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep.

Example 2 Production of rAAV by Infecting Silkworm Larvae with Recombinant Baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep

(61) (1) Construction of Recombinant Baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep and Verification of Virus Activity

(62) In this example, the combination of choices of the main components was similar to that used in the construction of recombinant baculovirus in Example 1, and was show below:

(63) Cap-LinkA-(ITR-GFP)-linkB-Rep

(64) The ITR-GFP was linked by a ligation nucleic acid segment between the P10 and PH promoter in a pFBD vector by conventional molecular cloning, to construct a recombinant shuttle plasmid pFBD/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep, as shown in FIG. 2C.

(65) Following the operation process of a Bac to Bac system, BmDH10Bac strain containing the BmNPV baculovirus genome was transformed with the recombinant shuttle plasmid. A recombinant baculovirus genome (Bacmid) was obtained by Tn7 transposon-mediated recombination. Positive strains containing recombinant Bacmid were obtained by blue-white spot screening and PCR identification. The recombinant Bacmid was purified by extraction, with which BmN cells in adherent culture was transfected. The insect cells were gradually completely infected by the recombinant baculovirus produced after transfection and displayed obvious cytopathogenic effect (CPE). The cell culture was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm, and the supernatant contained the produced recombinant baculovirus (BEV).

(66) BmN cells in adherent culture were infected with the supernatant and then cultured for 3 days. It was observed that the non-infected BmN cells in the control group grew normally, and no GFP was expressed. In contrast, in the test group, obvious cytopathogenic effect (CPE) occurred to the BmN cells infected with BEV, and GFP expression was obvious, as shown in FIG. 7A. This suggested that the BEV was successfully produced through the above scheme. The cultured BmN cells were further infected with BEV produced after transfecting the BmN cells, and obvious CPE occurred to the cells 3 days after infection. The cell culture was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm, and the BEV supernatant was obtained. The BEV titer was determined by quantitative fluorescent PCR, as described in ProcNatlAcadSci USA, 2009. 106 (13): p. 5059-64.

(67) The cultured BmN cells were infected with the BEV produced in Example 2 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5. Three days after infection, the culture supernatant and cells were collected separately. The BEV was mainly secreted and released into the culture supernatant, and some un-released BEV was also present in BmN cells. The rAAV was mainly present in the cell nucleus. Since CPE occurred after the insect cells were infected and some cells were lysed, rAAV was also partly released into the supernatant. Therefore, BEV and rAAV were present in both the supernatant and the cells.

(68) To verify that active rAAV was produced by infecting BmN cells with the recombinant baculovirus, the production of rAAV with the system was experimentally confirmed by HEK293 cells and Sf9 cells based infection assays. The experimental results are shown in FIG. 7B. The specific implementation process and the result analysis were as follows. The cell pellets were subjected to 3 rounds of repeated freezing and thawing, and then lysed. The cell lysate supernatant was collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 5000 rpm. The rAAV was non-enveloped, and the activity was not affected after 30 min-treatment at 60 C.; and the recombinant baculovirus (BEV) was enveloped, and deactivated after 30 min-treatment at 60 C. A simple infection-based method was used to test the rAAV activity (FIG. 7B). For rAAV2 (293 cells derived) samples, in 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP. In BmN cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated cannot express GFP, it indicates that rAAV2 do not infect BmN cells. For BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep supernatant samples, which contain the major secreted BEV and some rAAV. In 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP, while the GFP expression of the treated decrease significantly, because inactive BEV do not express GFP and only some rAAV can express GFP. In BmN cells-based infection assays, the untreated can express GFP, but the treated cannot express GFP. For BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep infected BmN cells lysate supernatant samples, which contain some non-secret BEVs and the major rAAV. In 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP, but GFP expression of the treated decrease slightly. It indicates that there is large amount of rAAVs expressing GFP. In BmN cells-based infection assays, the untreated can express GFP, while the treated cannot express GFP (FIG. 7B).

(69) The results shown in FIG. 7A indicate that rAAV can be produced by infecting BmN cells with the recombinant baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep.

(70) (2) Production of rAAV by Infecting Silkworm Larvae with Recombinant Baculovirus (BEV)

(71) Hatched silkworm larvae were fed to 4-5th instar larvae. The larvae were anesthetized on ice, and inoculated by subcutaneously injecting about 20 L recombinant baculovirus (with a BEV titer of about 110.sup.7 VG/mL) using a micro-syringe. Then, the larvae were cultured in a culture dish with a lid, and fed for additional 6-7 days. The infected silkworm larvae had obvious pathologic symptom changes, such as appetite loss, slow movement and swollen somite. The un-infected silkworm larvae grew normally, as shown in FIG. 8.

(72) (3) Lysis of Larvae, Purification and Activity Verification of rAAV

(73) The collected larvae were mashed and ground, added with a PBS solution, and homogenized, followed by 3 rounds of repeated freezing and thawing. After centrifugation for 10 min at 5000 rpm, the larvae lysate supernatant was collected. After the silkworm larvae were infected with BEV, rAAV was produced in the larvae cells while BEV was multiplied. Both BEV and rAAV were present in the larvae lysate supernatant.

(74) To verify that rAAV was produced by infecting silkworm larvae by injecting the recombinant baculovirus, the production of rAAV was experimentally confirmed by HEK293 cells and BmN cells based infection assays. The experimental results are shown in FIG. 9A. Given the fact that rAAV was non-enveloped, and the activity was not affected after 30 min-treatment at 60 C.; and the recombinant baculovirus (BEV) was enveloped, and deactivated after 30 min-treatment at 60 C., the specific implementation process and the result analysis were as follows.

(75) For the crude uninfected larvae lysate supernatant samples, in both 293 and BmN cells-based infection assays, there are no GFP expression (FIG. 9A). For the crude infected larvae lysate supernatant samples, in 293 cells-based infection assays, both the treated and untreated can express GFP, but GFP expression of the treated decrease slightly. It indicates that there is large amount of rAAVs expressing GFP. In BmN cells-based infection assays, the untreated can express GFP, but the treated cannot express GFP (FIG. 9A).

(76) Similar to the difference in thermo-stability, the differences in chloroform tolerance between enveloped BEV and non-enveloped AAV allowed the specific inactivation of BEV by chloroform extraction treatment. The crude larvae lysate supernatant samples were subject to chloroform extraction for 3 times. In 293 cells-based infection assays, the infected samples can express GFP, and the uninfected cannot express GFP. This result suggests that the infected samples contain rAAV tolerable for chloroform extraction treatment (FIG. 9B).

(77) The above results showed that active rAAV was successfully prepared by infecting silkworm larvae with the recombinant baculovirus BEV/Cap-(ITR-GFP)-Rep.

(78) Unless otherwise indicated, the numerical ranges involved in the invention include the end values. While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects, and therefore, the aim in the appended claims is to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.