Recombinant <i>E. coli </i>and method of producing Danshensu by using same

Abstract

The present disclosure discloses a production method of Danshensu, belonging to the technical field of bioengineering. The present disclosure constructs a novel genetic engineering strain co-expressed by three enzymes, which can be applied to the production of optically pure 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-hydroxypropionic acid. All of the (D/L)--hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase selected by the present disclosure have the characteristics of poor substrate specificity and strong optical specificity, and can produce optically pure D-danshensu and L-danshensu. Further, the production efficiency of the recombinant strain is improved by knocking out or enhancing the expression of a related gene on the E. coli genome to promote substrate transport and reduce product decomposition. The method for producing Danshensu and -ketoglutaric acid by using the transformation of the recombinant strain according to the present disclosure is simple, has easily available raw materials, few impurities, and has good industrial application prospects.

Claims

1. A recombinant Escherichia coli (E. coli), wherein the recombinant E. coli simultaneously expresses an -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase and an L-amino acid oxidase, wherein the recombinant E. coli expresses any one or more of: an exogenous L-glutamate dehydrogenase, an exogenous L-lactate dehydrogenase, a glucose dehydrogenase, and a tyrosine phenol lyase, wherein when the recombinant E. coli expresses tyrosine phenol lyase and L-lactate dehydrogenase, the tyrosine phenol lyase and the L-lactate dehydrogenase are simultaneously expressed; wherein the -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase is from Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecalis, or Lactobacillus fermentum; wherein the L-amino acid oxidase is expressed from any one or more of the gene of: pmaao from Proteus mirabilis, cmaao from Cosenzaea myxofaciens, praao from Providencia rettgeri, mmaao from Morganella morganii, and ilaao from Ignatzschineria larvae; wherein the L-glutamate dehydrogenase is from E. coli, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Clostridium symbiosum, or Bacillus subtilis; wherein the L-lactate dehydrogenase is from Lactococcus lactis; wherein the glucose dehydrogenase is from Bacillus subtilis; wherein the tyrosine phenol lyase is from Erwinia herbicola; and wherein the recombinant E. coli comprises a gene knockout of hpaD and mhpB.

2. The recombinant E. coli according to claim 1, wherein the recombinant E. coli further comprises a constitutive promoter upstream of and operatively linked to a gene with enhanced expression, wherein the gene with enhanced expression is expressed in the recombinant E. coli, wherein the constitutive promoter enhances expression of the gene with enhanced expression; wherein the gene with enhanced expression is selected from one or more of: an E. coli glutamate transporter gene gltS, an E. coli lactate transporter gene lldP, an E. coli catechol transporter gene hpaX, an E. coli NAD synthesis gene nadA, and an E. coli FAD synthesis gene ribF; wherein when the recombinant E. coli expresses the catechol transporter gene hpaX and the lactate transporter gene lldP, the catechol transporter gene hpaX and the lactate transporter gene lldP are expressed simultaneously, and wherein when the recombinant E. coli expresses the glutamate transporter gene gltS and the lactate transporter gene lldP, the glutamate transporter gene gtlS and the lactate transporter gene lldP are expressed at different times.

3. The recombinant E. coli according to claim 2, wherein the gene with enhanced expression is any one or more of gltS, nadA, and ribF.

4. The recombinant E. coli according to claim 2, wherein the gene with enhanced expression is any one or more of lldP, nadA, and ribF.

5. The recombinant E. coli according to claim 2, wherein the gene with enhanced expression is any one or more of E. coli genes lldP, hpaX, mhpT, nadA, pdxJ, and ribF.

6. The recombinant E. coli according to claim 1, wherein the L-glutamate dehydrogenase, L-lactate dehydrogenase, glucose dehydrogenase, tyrosine phenol lyase, L-lactate dehydrogenase, -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, and L-amino acid oxidase are all co-expressed.

7. The recombinant E. coli according to claim 1, wherein the recombinant E. coli is E. coli strain BL21.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(1) The core function of the engineering strain according to the present disclosure is that a plurality of enzymes can be simultaneously expressed, which respectively are L-amino acid oxidase and -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase and any one of the following: exogenous L-glutamate dehydrogenase, exogenous L-lactate dehydrogenase, glucose dehydrogenase, tyrosine phenol lyase, and L-lactate dehydrogenase, wherein the tyrosine phenol lyase and the L-lactate dehydrogenase are simultaneously expressed. The principle is that in the whole cell of the engineering strain, any one of L-glutamate dehydrogenase, L-lactate dehydrogenase, and glucose dehydrogenase will produce corresponding -ketoglutaric acid, pyruvic acid, gluconic acid and NADH by dehydrogenating the corresponding L-glutamic acid, L-lactic acid, and glucose using the NAD in the strain as a coenzyme; the tyrosine phenol lyase produces levodopa by catalyzing pyruvic acid, ammonium ion and catechol; the levodopa is deaminated to generate 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpyruvic acid by the L-amino acid oxidase; the -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase reduces the 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpyruvic acid to Danshensu using NADH which is produced by dehydrogenation of glutamic acid and the coenzyme of NAD is regenerated simultaneously. The transport of the substrate is promoted and the decomposition of the product is reduced by knocking out or enhancing the expression of the related genes on the E. coli genome simultaneously, and thus the yield of the target product is increased.

(2) 1. Strains and Plasmids Involved by the Present Disclosure

(3) Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 35038, Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 14931, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 13952, E. coli BL21 (DE3), Proteus mirabilis ATCC 29906, Cosenzaea myxofaciens ATCC 19692, MorganellaMorganella morganii ATCC 49993 Lactococcus lactis ATCC 19257, Erwinia herbicola ATCC 214344, and Aeromonas phenologenes ATCC 7966 purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Bacillus coagulans DSM 1, Weissella confusa strain DSM 20196, ProvidenciaProvidencia rettgeri DSM 1131, and Ignatzschineria larvae DSM 13226 purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). PETDuet-1, pACYCDue-1, pCOLADuet-1, pRSFDuet-1 plasmid and E. coli BL21 (DE3) purchased from Novagen. pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA purchased from Zhenjiang Aibimeng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

(4) 2. Knockout and Constitutive Enhanced Expression of Related Genes in E. coli

(5) (1) Knockout of Genes Related to the Decomposition of Phenolic Compounds in E. coli

(6) The phenolic substances according to the present disclosure are highly susceptible to decomposition by enzymes in E. coli, and the related genes are knocked out according to the literature (Biodegradation of Aromatic Compounds by E. coli, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001, 65(4): 523-569.) to avoid decomposition of products and substrates. The selected genes are hpaD and mhpB with NCBI accession NO. NC_012892 REGION: complement (4505585 . . . 4506436) and NC_012892 REGION: 339806 . . . 340750.

(7) (2) Constitutive Enhanced Expression of Glutamate Transporter Gene in E. coli

(8) The process of whole cell transformation cannot be performed until the substrates are transported into the cell. The enhanced glutamate transporter helps to maintain the high concentration of the intracellular substrate quickly and for a long time, which is beneficial to the performance of the reaction. The selected gene associated with glutamate transport is gltS with NCBI accession NO. NC_012892 REGION: complement (3694931 . . . 3696136). Dopa is similar to aromatic amino acids and needs to absorb amino acids and the like during cell culture. Therefore, the strains themselves express a large number of amino acid transporters without further enhancing expression.

(9) (3) Constitutive Enhanced Expression of Key Genes Related to Coenzyme Synthesis in E. coli

(10) In the reduction process of -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, it is necessary to use NADH as a coenzyme. NAD level in the strain can be improved by enhancing the expression of key enzymes in the NAD synthesis pathway of E. coli, which is beneficial to the formation of Danshensu. The selected gene is nadA with NCBI accession NO. NC_012892 REGION: 740487 . . . 741530.

(11) FAD is a coenzyme of L-amino acid oxidase. Overexpressing the important gene ribF in the coenzyme pathway is beneficial to strengthen L-amino acid oxidase activity. The accession NO in NCBI is: NC_012892 REGION: 25479 . . . 26420.

(12) 3. Selection of Enzyme

(13) (1) Selection of L-Amino Acid Oxidase

(14) L-amino acid oxidase widely exists in bacteria, fungi, mammalian cells, snake venom, insect toxins and algae (L-amino acid oxidase as biocatalyst: a dream too far. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:9323-41). L-amino acid oxidase transfers hydrogen on the -amino group and -carbon atom to the FAD, and most of which directly oxidize reduced FAD using the molecular oxygen to produce the oxidized FAD, and simultaneously hydrogen peroxide is produced. For example, Poljanac et al. oxidized dopa to produce 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpyruvic acid using the snake venom L-amino acid oxidase of Crotalus adamanteus, followed by adding lactate dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase to generate 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl lactic acid. In addition, catalase must be added during this process to eliminate the toxicity of hydrogen peroxide (Modelling and Optimization of the (R)-(+)-3,4-Dihydroxyphenyllactic Acid Production Catalyzed, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q.2005, 19 (4) 351-358). There is also a class of L-amino acid oxidases associated with electron transport chains on the cell membrane. Electrons are transported to the cytochrome oxidase via the respiratory chain, reducing molecular oxygen to water, thereby not generating hydrogen peroxide. This enzyme is mainly present in bacteria such as Proteus sp., Providencia sp., Morganella sp., etc. (Crystal structure of a membrane-bound I-amino acid deaminase from Proteus vulgaris. J. Struct Biol. 2016, 195: 306-15). The present disclosure selects five L-amino acid oxidases which do not produce hydrogen peroxide, and L-amino acid oxidase genes pmaao, cmaao, praao, mmaao, and ilaao are cloned from Proteus mirabilis ATCC 29906, Cosenzaea myxofaciens ATCC 19692, Providencia rettgeri DSM 1131, Morganella morganii ATCC 49993, Ignatzschineria larvae DSM 13226, respectively, the amino acid sequence of which are the sequences of accession NO. WP_004244224.1, OAT30925.1, EFE55026.1, WP_036414800.1 or WP_026879504.1 in NCBI. These enzymes are characterized by a wide range of substrates and strong activity.

(15) (2) Selection of -Hydroxycarboxylic Acid Dehydrogenase

(16) According to the condition of the optimum substrate, the -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase includes lactate dehydrogenase, -hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase, mandelic acid dehydrogenase, glyoxylate reductase, etc. These enzymes can act extensively on a variety of substrates to generate -hydroxycarboxylic acids, and usually named after their optimum substrate. The present disclosure selects an enzyme which is highly optically active and has a strong activity against 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpyruvic acid for the production of D or L danshensu. The D-type -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase genes lpldhd, efmdhd, and lfldhd are cloned from Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 35038, and Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 14931, respectively, the amino acid sequence of which are the sequences of accession NO. WP_003643296.1, WP_002335374.1 and EEI22188.1 in NCBI. The L-type -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase genes bcldhl, wcldhl and Ifldhl are cloned from Bacillus coagulans DSM 1, Weissella confusa strain DSM 20196 and Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 14931, respectively, the amino acid sequence of which are the sequences of accession NO. WP_013858488.1, WP_003607654.1, WP_035430779.1 in NCBI.

(17) (3) Selection of L-Glutamate Dehydrogenase

(18) L-glutamic acid is the most inexpensive amino acid. The -ketoglutaric acid generated by dehydrogenation has a high added value. Currently, L-glutamic acid oxidase is mainly used for oxidizing L-glutamic acid to produce -ketoglutaric acid, and in this process, hydrogen removed from L-glutamic acid is wasted. L-glutamate dehydrogenase widely exists in almost all organisms, and L-glutamic acid is used as a substrate to transfer hydrogen generated on L-glutamic acid to coenzyme NAD or NADP to generate NADH or NADPH. NADH or NADPH can be used as the hydrogen donor of the aforementioned hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase. The present disclosure obtains the L-glutamic acid genes ecgdh (amino acid sequence WP_000373021.1), rsgdh (amino acid sequence WP_011338202.1), csgdh (amino acid sequence WP_003497202.1) and bsgdh (amino acid sequence WP_010886557.1) from E. coli BL21, Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATCC BAA-808, Clostridium symbiosum ATCC 14940, and Bacillus subtilis 168, respectively.

(19) (4) Selection of L-Lactate Dehydrogenase

(20) L-lactic acid is the most inexpensive organic acid, and pyruvic acid generated by dehydrogenation has a higher added value. At present, L-lactate oxidase is mainly used for oxidizing L-lactic acid to produce pyruvic acid, and in this process, the hydrogen removed from L-lactic acid is wasted. There are also methods for producing keto acid by yeast fermentation. L-lactate dehydrogenase widely exists in a variety of microorganisms, and L-lactic acid is used as a substrate to transfer hydrogen generated on L-lactic acid to coenzyme NAD or NADP to generate NADH or NADPH. NADH or NADPH can be used as the hydrogen donor of the aforementioned -hydroxy acid dehydrogenase. In general, the lactate dehydrogenase with NADH (NADPH) as a coenzyme tends to synthesize lactic acid with pyruvic acid as a substrate, but when lactate is excessively introduced, some lactate dehydrogenase will remove hydrogen from lactic acid to form pyruvic acid.

(21) The present disclosure obtains the L-lactate dehydrogenase gene llldh (amino acid sequence WP_003131075.1) from Lactococcus lactis ATCC 19257.

(22) (5) Selection of Tyrosine Phenol Lase

(23) Tyrosine phenol lyase (TPL, EC4.1.99.2) is also known as -tyrosinase. The tyrosine phenol lyase can catalyze the -elimination reaction of L-tyrosine to generate phenol, pyruvic acid and ammonia, and can also catalyze the -elimination reaction of dopa to produce catechol, pyruvic acid and ammonia. The reaction is reversible, and catechol, pyruvic acid and ammonia can be catalyzed by the tyrosine phenol lyase to form L-dopa. In the present disclosure, the tyrosine phenol lyase gene ehtpl is cloned from Erwinia herbicola ATCC 214344, and the amino acid sequence thereof is P31011.2.

(24) (6) Selection of Glucose Dehydrogenase

(25) In the biotransformation reaction, -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase requires NADH and/or NADPH as coenzymes, and often uses formate dehydrogenase, glucose dehydrogenase, phosphite dehydrogenase, etc to regenerate NADH and/or NADPH. Glucose dehydrogenase is the most active compared to other enzymes. Therefore, the present disclosure obtains the glucose dehydrogenase gene bsgdh from Bacillus subtilis ATCC 13952 (amino acid sequence WP_013351020.1).

(26) 4. Construction of Co-Expression System and Culture of Cell

(27) At present, there are multiple methods for co-expression of E. coli multi-gene (Strategy of multi-gene co-expression in E. coli, Journal of Chinese Biotechnology, 2012, 32(4): 117-122). The construction according to the present disclosure is performed using the method as described in Liu Xianglei (Produce Shikimic Acid and Resveratrol by modifying E. coli using Synthetic Biology Technology, 2016, Shanghai Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry, PhD thesis). T7 promoter and an RBS binding point are both contained in front of each gene. Theoretically, since each gene has T7 and RBS in front, the expression intensity of the gene is not significantly affected by the arrangement order. Three genes were included in each plasmid, and the constructed plasmid was heat-transferred into E. coli competent cells and plated on an antibiotic solid plate to obtain a positive transformant upon screening, i.e. recombinant E. coli. Culture of cells: according to the classical recombinant E. coli culture and induced expression protocol, recombinant E. coli is transferred to LB fermentation medium (peptone 10 g/L, yeast powder 5 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L) at a volume ratio of 2%. When the OD600 of cells reaches 0.6-0.8, IPTG is added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM, and culture is performed at 20 C. for 8 h to induce expression. After the induction of expression is completed, the cells are collected by centrifugation at 20 C. and 8000 rpm for 20 minutes.

(28) 5. Detection and Analysis of Sample

(29) Quantitative analysis of Danshensu: The transformation liquid is detected and analyzed by a PerkinElmer Series 200 high performance liquid chromatographic instrument fitted with a refractive index detector. The chromatographic conditions are as follows: a mobile phase of methanol-0.1% formic acid/water (40:60), a Hanbang Megres C18 chromatographic column (4.6250 mm, 5 m), a flow rate of 1 ml/min, a column temperature of 30 C., and an injection volume of 20 L.

(30) Chiral analysis: the detection and analysis are performed by a PerkinElmer Series 200 high performance liquid chromatographic instrument fitted with a UV detector, Chiralcel OD-H chiral column (4.6250 mm), mobile phase volume ratio of n-hexane:isopropanol:trifluoroacetic acid=80:20:0.1, the flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, the column temperature of 25 C., the injection volume of 20 L, and the detection wavelength of 280 nm.

(31) The solubility of Danshensu is low, and if a crystal is separated out during the transformation process, then measured after dilution.

(32) The optical purity of Danshensu is evaluated by the enantiomeric excess value (% e.e).

(33) When producing R-danshensu,

(34) Enantiomeric excess value (% e.e)=[(SRSS)/(SR+SS)100%]

(35) When producing S-danshensu,

(36) Enantiomeric excess value (% e.e)=[(SSSR)/(SR+SS)100%]

(37) Where SS is the peak area of S-danshensu in the transformation liquid, and SR is the peak area in liquid chromatography of R-danshensu in the transformation liquid.

EXAMPLE 1

(38) For the screening of L-glutamate dehydrogenase, various L-glutamate dehydrogenase genes were respectively cloned from various strains and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Method for inducing expression: recombinant E. coli was transferred to an LB fermentation medium (peptone 10 g/L, yeast powder 5 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L) in a volume ratio of 2%, when the OD600 of cells reached 0.6-0.8, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM, and culture was performed at 20 C. for 8 h to induce expression. After the induction of expression was completed, the cells were collected by centrifugation at 20 C. and 8000 rpm for 20 minutes.

(39) According to the literature (Cloning, expression and enzyme activity determination of glutamate dehydrogenase gene in Bacillus natto. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science), 2010, 1: 82-86.), the activity of a crude enzyme solution was measured by cell disruption, and the activity of L-glutamate dehydrogenase with NAD as a coenzyme was measured by the method described above. The results were shown in Table 1. Therefore, it is preferred to select the L-glutamate dehydrogenase bsgdh derived from Bacillus subtilis for the production of Danshensu.

(40) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of activities of different L-amino acid dehydrogenases Recombinant strain Activity U/ml E. coli BL21(DE3)/pETDuet-1-ecgdh 0.3 E. coli BL21(DE3)/pETDuet-1-rsgdh 1.1 E. coli BL21(DE3)/pETDuet-1-csgdh 1.6 E. coli BL21(DE3)/pETDuet-1-bsgdh 3.5

EXAMPLE 2

(41) hpaD and mhpB on E. coli BL21 (DE3) were singly or doubly knocked out according to the method described in the literature (Large scale validation of an efficient CRISPR/Cas-based multi gene editing protocol in E. coli. Microbial Cell Factories, 2017, 16(1):68). Wherein, the gene knockout plasmids used in the present disclosure were pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA (hpaD sgRNA), which were introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) together with a homologous arm (hpaD donor), and Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the hpaD gene in a host. The recombinant enzyme Red integrated hpaD donor into the hpaD gene to achieve gene knockout and sequencing verification. hpaD sgRNA, hpaD donor, mhpB sgRNA, and mhpB donor were shown in SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 18, and SEQ ID NO: 19, respectively. mhpB was knocked out in the same way.

(42) A solution with the pH of 7 was prepared, in which the levodopa or D-danshensu was 4 g/L, the wet cell volume was 200 g/L, and the concentration was measured after standing at 35 C. for 10 hours. Table 2 showed the remaining amount of levodopa and D-Danshensu in the reaction system.

(43) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Residual concentrations of different strains after decomposition of substrates and products Levodopa g/L D-Danshensu g/L E. coli BL21(DE3) 1.5 1.5 E. coli BL21(hpaDmhpB, DE3) 3.6 3.6 E. coli BL21(hpaD, DE3) 2.1 2.7 E. coli BL21(mhpB, DE3) 1.6 1.6 E. coli BL21 (hpaDmhpB, DE3) worked best and was named E. coli HM.

EXAMPLE 3

(44) Construction of recombinant E. coli simultaneously expressing -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, L-amino acid oxidase and exogenous L-glutamate dehydrogenase: the genes encoding tyrosine phenol lyase, L-amino acid oxidase, -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase and L-glutamate dehydrogenase were firstly ligated to a plasmid. A recombinant plasmid co-expressed by the three genes was obtained, which was transformed into E. coli HM, and a positive transformant, i.e. recombinant E. coli, was obtained by screening with an antibiotic plate.

(45) After the induced expression of recombinant E. coli was completed, the strains were collected. A reaction was carried out in a reaction volume of 100 ml at 35 C. for 12 hours, in which the wet cell weight was 40 g/L, the concentration of levodopa was 40 g/L, the concentration of L-glutamic acid was 30 g/L, and pH was 8.0. The yield and configuration of Danshensu were determined by liquid chromatography after the transformation. The results were shown in Table 3.

(46) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparison of various recombinant strains Danshensu -ketoglutaric Recombinant strains Concentration e.e acid g/L Configuration % g/L E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 17.7 S >99.9 18.4 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-bcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 16.5 S >99.9 19.4 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lfldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 13.4 S >99.9 14.2 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 19.8 R >99.9 23.2 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lpldhd-bsgdh-1-cmaao 16.4 R >99.9 18.0 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 20.1 R >99.9 19.0 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-pmaao 13.2 R >99.9 14.6 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-praao 18.4 R >99.9 24.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-mmaao 19.1 R >99.9 21.3 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-ilaao 17.9 R >99.9 25.3 E. coli HM/pACYCDue-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 20.4 R >99.9 27.0 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 24.9 R >99.9 28.6 E. coli HM/pRSFDuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 22.0 R >99.9 25.8 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 23.7 S >99.9 28.5

(47) Construction of recombinant E. coli simultaneously expressing -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, L-amino acid oxidase and exogenous L-lactate dehydrogenase: the genes encoding L-amino acid oxidase, -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, and L-lactate dehydrogenase were firstly ligated to the pETDuet-1 or pACYCDuet-1 plasmid. A recombinant plasmid co-expressed by the three genes was obtained, which was transformed into E. coli HM, and a positive transformant, i.e. recombinant E. coli, was obtained by screening with chloramphenicol and ampicillin plates.

(48) After the induced expression of recombinant E. coli was completed, the strains were collected. A reaction was carried out in a reaction volume of 100 ml at 35 C. for 12 hours, in which the wet cell weight was 40 g/L, the concentration of levodopa was 40 g/L, the concentration of L-lactic acid was 30 g/L, and pH was 8.0. The yield and configuration of Danshensu were determined by liquid chromatography after the transformation. The results were shown in Table 4.

(49) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Comparison of various recombinant strains Danshensu pyruvic Concentration Configuration e.e acid Recombinant strains g/L % g/L E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh-cmaao 17.9 S >99.9 9.2 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-bcldhl-llldh-cmaao 8.4 S >99.9 5.3 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-1fldhl-llldh-cmaao 3.7 S >99.9 2.2 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 19.8 R >99.9 11.4 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lpldhd-llldh-1-cmaao 3.4 R >99.9 2.0 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-pmaao 17.6 R >99.9 9.5 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-praao 18.2 R >99.9 12.3 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-mmaao 17.3 R >99.9 11.6 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-ilaao 18.7 R >99.9 13.0 E. coli HM/pACYCDue-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 19.5 R >99.9 13.5 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 22.3 R >99.9 14.3 E. coli HM/pRSFDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 20.1 R >99.9 12.1 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-wcldh1-llldh-cmaao 21.7 S >99.9 14.8

(50) Construction of recombinant E. coli simultaneously expressing -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, L-amino acid oxidase, tyrosine phenol lyase and L-lactate dehydrogenase: the genes encoding tyrosine phenol lyase, L-amino acid oxidase, -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, and L-lactate dehydrogenase were firstly ligated to the pETDuet-1 or pACYCDuet-1 plasmid, respectively. Two recombinant plasmids co-expressed by two genes were obtained, which were transformed into E. coli HM, and a positive transformant, i.e. recombinant E. coli, was obtained by screening with chloramphenicol and ampicillin plates.

(51) After the induced expression of recombinant E. coli was completed, the strains were collected. A reaction was carried out in a reaction volume of 100 ml at 35 C. for 12 hours, in which the wet cell weight was 20 g/L, the concentration of catechol was 10 g/L, the concentration of L-lactic acid was 10 g/L, pH was 8.0, and the concentration of ammonium ion was 30 g/L. The yield and configuration of Danshensu were determined by liquid chromatography after the transformation. The results were shown in Table 5.

(52) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Comparison of various recombinant strains Danshensu Concentration Recombinant strains g/L Configuration e.e % E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 8.5 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-cmaao-cftpl + pACYCDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh 7.2 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-mmaao-ehtpl + pACYCDuet-1-bcldhl-llldh 7.3 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-bcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-mmaao-ehtpl 4.7 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lfldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-praao-ehtpl 2.2 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 8.1 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl + pACYCDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh 6.1 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 7.7 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lpldhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-pmaao-ehtpl 1.4 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lfldhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-ilaao-aptpl 5.8 R >99.9

(53) Construction of recombinant E. coli simultaneously expressing -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, L-amino acid oxidase, and glucose dehydrogenase: the genes encoding L-amino acid oxidase, -hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenase, and glucose dehydrogenase were firstly ligated to the pETDuet-1 or pACYCDuet-1 plasmid. Recombinant plasmids co-expressed by the three genes were obtained, which were transformed into E. coliHM, and a positive transformant, i.e. recombinant E. coli, were obtained by screening with chloramphenicol and ampicillin plates.

(54) Method for inducing expression: recombinant E. coli was transferred to an LB fermentation medium (peptone 10 g/L, yeast powder 5 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L) in a volume ratio of 2%, when the OD600 of cells reached 0.6-0.8, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM, and culture was performed at 20 C. for 8 h to induce expression. After the induction of expression was completed, the cells were collected by centrifugation at 20 C. and 8000 rpm for 20 minutes.

(55) After the induced expression of recombinant E. coli was completed, the strains were collected. A reaction was carried out in a reaction volume of 100 ml at 35 C. for 12 hours, in which the wet cell weight was 40 g/L, the concentration of levodopa was 40 g/L, the concentration of glucose was 30 g/L, and pH was 8.0. The yield and configuration of Danshensu were determined by liquid chromatography after the transformation. The results were shown in Table 6.

(56) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Comparison of various recombinant strains Danshensu Concen- tration Config- Recombinant strains g/L uration e.e % E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 25.7 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-bcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 20.5 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lfldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 24.4 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 26.5 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-lpldhd-bsgdh-1-cmaao 24.6 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-pmaao 19.7 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-praao 24.4 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-mmaao 25.5 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-ilaao 27.3 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pACYCDue-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 24.1 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 20.8 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pRSFDuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 23.8 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 20.0 S >99.9

EXAMPLE 4

(57) A constitutive promoter (PG) having medium expression intensity in front of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gpdA) in E. coli was added in front of the corresponding gene on the E. coli HM genome using the method described in the literature Large scale validation of an efficient CRISPR/Cas-based multi gene editing protocol in E. coli. Microbial Cell Factories, 2017,16(1):68, and the sequence was shown in SEQ ID NO: 15.

(58) When the expression of the gene gltS was enhanced, the E. coli HM genome was used as a template, the upstream, promotor and downstream sequences were amplified with the primers gltS-FF/gltS-FR, gltS-gpdA-F/gltS-gpdA-R, and gltS-RF/gltS-RR, and were fused using gltS-FF and gltS-RR as primers to obtain an expression cassette containing the gpdA promoter. Then, after transforming into E. coli HM together with the plasmid pCasRed and pC CRISPR-gDNA (containing gltS sgRNA), the Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the gltS gene of the host, and the recombinase Red integrated the gpdA promoter in front of the gltS gene. Sequencing verification was then carried out.

(59) Table 7 below showed the corresponding indexes of the primer name and SEQ ID NO.

(60) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Correspondence of primer name and SEQ ID NO Name SEQ ID NO gltS sgRNA SEQ ID NO: 1 gltS-FF SEQ ID NO: 3 gltS-FR SEQ ID NO: 4 gltS-gpdA-F SEQ ID NO: 5 gltS-gpdA-R SEQ ID NO: 6 gltS-RF SEQ ID NO: 7 gltS-RR SEQ ID NO: 8

(61) Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 1, and various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 8. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 5 g/L, L-glutamic acid 50 g/L, levodopa 20 g/L, pH 8.0, temperature 40 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 12 hours.

(62) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu g/L - Concentration ketoglutaric Recombinant strains g/L Configuration e.e % acidg/L E. coli HM (PG-gltS)/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 6.8 R >99.9 7.2 E. coli HM (PG-gltS)/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 7.2 S >99.9 7.8 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 5.6 R >99.9 5.9 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 5.3 S >99.9 5.7

(63) The best-performing E. coli HM (PG-gltS) was named E. coli HML-1.

(64) When the expression of the gene lldP was enhanced, the upstream, promoter and downstream sequences were amplified by using the E. coli HM genome as a template, and an expression cassette containing the gpdA promoter was obtained. Then, after transforming into E. coli HM together with plasmid pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA (including lldP sgRNA), Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the lldP gene of a host, and recombinase Red integrated the gpdA promoter in front of lldP gene. Sequencing verification was then carried out.

(65) Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 2, and various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 9. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 5 g/L, L-lactic acid 50 g/L, levodopa 20 g/L, pH 8.0, temperature 40 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 12 hours.

(66) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu Concentration Pyruvic Recombinant strains g/L Configuration e.e % acid g/L E. coli HM (PG-lldP)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh- 6.4 R >99.9 5.1 cmaao E. coli HM (PG-lldP)/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-llldh-cmaao 7.2 S >99.9 4.8 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 4.9 R >99.9 3.2 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-llldh-cmaao 5.8 S >99.9 3.9

(67) The best-performing E. coli HM (PG-lldP) was named E. coli HML-2.

(68) When the expression of the gene hpaX was enhanced, the upstream, promoter and downstream sequences were firstly amplified using a method similar to that for enhancing the expression of the gene lldP, and the primers were designed to be fused to obtain an expression cassette containing the gpdA promoter. Then, after transfecting into E. coli HM together with plasmid pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA (including hpaX sgRNA), Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the hpaX gene of a host, and recombinase Red integrated the gpdA promoter in front of hpaX gene. Sequencing verification was then carried out.

(69) When the expression of the gene mhpT was enhanced, the upstream, promoter and downstream sequences were firstly amplified using a method similar to that for enhancing the expression of the gene lldP, and the primers were designed to be fused to obtain an expression cassette containing the gpdA promoter. Then, after transforming into E. coli HM together with plasmid pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA (including mhpT sgRNA), Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the mhpT gene of a host, and recombinase Red integrated the gpdA promoter in front of mhpT gene. Sequencing verification was then carried out.

(70) Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 2, and various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 10. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 10 g/L, L-lactic acid 200 g/L, catechol 10 g/L, pH 8.0, temperature 40 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 12 hours.

(71) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu g/L Concentration Recombinant strains g/L Configuration e.e % E. coli HM (PG-lldP)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 6.9 S >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HM (PG-hpaX)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 5.9 S >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HM (PG-mhpT)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 5.3 S >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HM (PG-hpaX, PG-mhpT)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl- 6.8 S >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HM (PG-lldP, PG-hpaX, PG-mhpT)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl- 7.8 S >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HM (PG-lldP, PG-hpaX, PG-mhpT)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl- 8.0 S >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 4.8 S >99.9 E. coli HM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao- 5.4 R >99.9 ehtpl

(72) The best-performing E. coli HM (PG-lldP,PG-hpaX,PG-mhpT) was named E. coli HMLHM.

EXAMPLE 5

(73) A constitutive promoter (PG) having medium expression intensity in front of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gpdA) in E. coli was added in front of the genes nadA and ribF in E. coli HML according to the method in Example 4, and the sequence was shown in SEQ ID NO: 15. The plasmid was then introduced.

(74) When the expression of the gene nadA was enhanced, the E. coli HML genome was used as a template, the upstream, promotor and downstream sequences were amplified with the primers nadA-FF/nadA-FR, nadA-gpdA-F/nadA-gpdA-R, and nadA-RF/nadA-RR, and were fused using nadA-FF and nadA-RR as primers to obtain an expression cassette containing the gpdA promoter. Then, after transforming into E. coli HML together with the plasmid pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA (containing nadA sgRNA), the Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the nadA gene of a host, and the recombinase Red integrated the gpdA promoter in front of the nadA gene. Sequencing verification was then carried out.

(75) When the expression of the gene ribF was enhanced, the E. coli HML genome was used as a template, and the upstream, promotor and downstream sequences were amplified with the primers ribF-FF/ribF-FR, ribF-gpdA-F/ribF-gpdA-R, and ribF-RF/ribF-RR, and were fused using ribF-FF and ribF-RR as primers to obtain an expression cassette containing the gpdA promoter. Then, after transforming into E. coli HML together with the plasmid pCasRed and pCRISPR-gDNA (containing ribF sgRNA), the Cas9/sgRNA induced a double-strand break at the ribF gene of a host, and the recombinase Red integrated the gpdA promoter in front of the ribF gene. Sequencing verification was then carried out.

(76) Table 11 below showed the corresponding indexes of the primer name and SEQ ID NO.

(77) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 correspondence of primer name and SEQ ID NO Name SEQ ID NO ribF sgRNA SEQ ID NO: 20 nadA sgRNA SEQ ID NO: 2 ribF-FF SEQ ID NO: 21 ribF-FR SEQ ID NO: 22 ribF-gpdA-F SEQ ID NO: 23 ribF-gpdA-R SEQ ID NO: 24 ribF-RF SEQ ID NO: 25 ribF-RR SEQ ID NO: 26 nadA-FF SEQ ID NO: 9 nadA-FR SEQ ID NO: 10 nadA-gpdA-F SEQ ID NO: 11 nadA-gpdA-R SEQ ID NO: 12 nadA-RF SEQ ID NO: 13 nadA-RR SEQ ID NO: 14

(78) After the genetic modification was completed, the co-expression plasmid was introduced. Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 1, various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 12. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 20 g/L, L-glutamic acid 120 g/L, levodopa 120 g/L, pH 9.0, temperature 30 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 24 hours. The comparison of transformation results were shown in Table 12.

(79) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Comparison of transformation results - Danshensu g/L Ketoglutaric Concentration acid Strains g/L Configuration e.e % g/L E. coli HML(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh- 91.6 R >99.9 97.2 cmaao E. coli HML(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl- 95.0 S >99.9 96.1 bsgdh-cmaao E. coli HML(PG-ribF)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 73.3 R >99.9 77.4 E. coli HML(PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 81.5 R >99.9 87.2 E. coli HML/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 66.0 R >99.9 69.1 E. coli HML/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 69.3 S >99.9 73.5

(80) The best-performing E. coli HML (PG-nadA,PG-ribF) was named E. coli HNR-1.

(81) After the genetic modification was completed, the co-expression plasmid was introduced. Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 1, various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 7. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 20 g/L, L-lactic acid 100 g/L, levodopa 120 g/L, pH 9.0, temperature 30 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 24 hours. The comparison of transformation results were as shown in Table 13.

(82) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu Concentration Pyruvic Strains g/L Configuration e.e % acid g/L E. coli HML(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1- efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 92.1 R >99.9 50.2 E. coli HML(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1- wcldhl-llldh-cmaao 94.5 S >99.9 51.3 E. coli HML(PG-ribF)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh- cmaao 74.2 R >99.9 42.3 E. coli HML(PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh- cmaao 83.2 R >99.9 47.2 E. coli HML/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao 66.7 R >99.9 39.6 E. coli HML/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-llldh-cmaao 69.3 S >99.9 37.1

(83) The best-performing E. coli HML (PG-nadA,PG-ribF) was named E. coli HNR-2.

(84) After the genetic modification was completed, the co-expression plasmid was introduced. Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 1, various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 14. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 20 g/L, L-lactic acid 200 g/L, catechol 200 g/L, pH 9.0, temperature 30 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 24 hours.

(85) TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu Concentration Strains g/L Configuration e.e % E. coli HMLHM(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl- 87.2 S >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-ribF)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 66.9 S >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-nadA)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 84.9 S >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-nadA, PG-pdxJ)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl- 91.3 S >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-nadA, PG-ribF, PG-pdxJ)/pETDuet-1-wcldhl- 94.5 S >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 56.0 S >99.9 E. coli HMLHM(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pETDuet-1-efmdhd- 85.7 R >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-ribF)/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 58.5 R >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-nadA)/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1- 86.4 R >99.9 cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-nadA, PG-pdxJ)/pETDuet-1-efmdhd- 90.7 R >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM(PG-nadA, PG-ribF, PG-pdxJ)/pETDuet-1-efmdhd- 96.4 R >99.9 llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl E. coli HMLHM/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 60.4 R >99.9

(86) The best-performing E. coli HMLHM (PG-nadA,PG-ribF,PG-pdxJ) was named E. coli NPR.

(87) After the genetic modification was completed, the co-expression plasmid was introduced. Expression was induced according to the method described in Example 1, various types of cells were collected for transformation analysis, and the results were shown in Table 15. The whole cell transformation system in the transformation system was: wet cell weight 20 g/L, glucose 100 g/L, levodopa 120 g/L, pH 9.0, temperature 30 C., shaker speed 250 rpm; transformation time 24 hours.

(88) TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu g/L Concentration Strains g/L Configuration e.e % E. coli HM(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 95.6 R >99.9 E. coli HM(PG-ribF, PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 98.3 S >99.9 E. coli HM(PG-ribF)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 86.1 R >99.9 E. coli HM(PG-nadA)/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 88.9 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 75.0 R >99.9 E. coli HM/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 79.4 S >99.9

(89) The best-performing E. coli HML (PG-nadA,PG-ribF) was named E. coli NR.

EXAMPLE 6

(90) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 1 g/L, L-glutamic acid was 1 g/L, levodopa was 1 g/L, pH 6.0, temperature was 15 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 1 hour. As a result of the measurement, the concentration of R-danshensu was 93 mg/L, and e.e %>99.9.

(91) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-llldh-cmaao was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 1 g/L, L-lactic acid was 1 g/L, levodopa was 1 g/L, pH 6.0, temperature was 15 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 1 hour. As a result of the measurement, the concentration of R-danshensu was 93 mg/L, and e.e %>99.9.

(92) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh+pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 1 g/L, L-lactic acid was 1 g/L, catechol was 1 g/L, pH 6.0, temperature was 15 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 1 hour. As a result of the measurement, the concentration of S-danshensu was 78 mg/L.

(93) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of E. coli NR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 1 g/L, glucose was 1 g/L, levodopa was 1 g/L, pH 6.0, temperature was 15 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 1 hour. As a result of the measurement, the concentration of S-danshensu was 93 mg/L and e.e %>99.9.

EXAMPLE 7

(94) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of the strains in Table 16 was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 200 g/L, L-glutamic acid was 200 g/L, levodopa was 200 g/L, pH 8.5, temperature was 40 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 48 hours. The results were measured after all the precipitates were diluted and dissolved, and the results were shown in Table 16.

(95) TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Comparison of transformation results - Danshensu ketoglutaric Yield acid Strains g/L Configuration e.e % g/L E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-cmaao 183 R >99.9 184 E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 184 S >99.9 189 E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-pmaao 131 R >99.9 130 E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-lfldhd-bsgdh-praao 159 R >99.9 171 E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-mmaao 140 S >99.9 152 E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-praao 148 S >99.9 155

(96) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of the strains in Table 17 was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 200 g/L, L-lactic acid was 200 g/L, levodopa was 200 g/L, pH 8.5, temperature was 40 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 48 hours. The results were measured after all the precipitates were diluted and dissolved.

(97) TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu Pyruvic Yield Config- e.e acid Strains g/L uration % g/L E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd- 188 R >99.9 112 llldh-cmaao E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl- 186 S >99.9 108 llldh-cmaao E. coli NPR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd- 132 R >99.9 74 llldh-pmaao E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd- 162 R >99.9 93 llldh-praao E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl- 143 S >99.9 86 llldh-mmaao E. coli HNR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl- 146 S >99.9 90 llldh-praao

(98) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of the strains in Table 18 was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 200 g/L, L-lactic acid was 200 g/L, catechol was 200 g/L, pH 8.5, temperature was 40 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 48 hours. The results were measured after all the precipitates were diluted and dissolved.

(99) TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu Concentration Strains g/L Configuration e.e % E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 382 R >99.9 E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-wcldhl-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-cmaao-ehtpl 378 S >99.9 E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-pmaao-ehtpl 344 R >99.9 E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-ilaao-ehtpl 348 R >99.9 E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-mmaao-ehtpl 306 R >99.9 E. coli NPR/pETDuet-1-efmdhd-llldh + pACYCDuet-1-praao-ehtpl 333 R >99.9

(100) According to the method for inducing expression as described in Example 1, after the induced expression of the strains in Table 19 was completed, the strains were collected. The wet cell weight was 200 g/L, glucose was 200 g/L, levodopa was 200 g/L, pH 8.5, temperature was 40 C., and the shaker speed was 250 rpm in a 100 ml reaction system; transformation time was 48 hours. The results were measured after all the precipitates were diluted and dissolved.

(101) TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 Comparison of transformation results Danshensu Yield Config- e.e Strains g/L uration % E. coli NR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-cmaao 187.4 R >99.9 E. coli NR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-cmaao 192.6 S >99.9 E. coli PR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-pmaao 134.2 R >99.9 E. coli NR/pCOLADuet-1-efmdhd-bsgdh-praao 174.7 R >99.9 E. coli NR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-mmaao 155.6 S >99.9 E. coli NR/pCOLADuet-1-wcldhl-bsgdh-praao 171.0 S >99.9

(102) The modification and construction of the above-mentioned enzymes and the co-expressed genetic engineering strains thereof, the culture medium composition and culture method of the strains and the whole cell biotransformation are only preferred examples of the present disclosure, and are not intended to limit the present disclosure. Theoretically, other bacteria, filamentous fungi, actinomycetes, and animal cells can be genetically modified and used for multi-gene co-expressed whole-cell catalysis. Any modifications and equivalents made within the principles and spirit of the present disclosure.