Compositions for therapeutics, targeted PET imaging and methods of their use
10821195 ยท 2020-11-03
Assignee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY)
- Research Foundation Of The City University Of New York (New York, NY)
Inventors
- Jason S. Lewis (New York, NY)
- Melissa Deri (Hottsville, NY, US)
- Lynn Francesconi (Bridgewater, NJ, US)
- Shashikanth Ponnala (Secaucus, NJ, US)
Cpc classification
A61K9/0019
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K51/1051
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K51/0478
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K51/10
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
Described herein is a chelator for radiolabels (e.g., .sup.89Zr) for targeted PET imaging that is an alternative to DFO. In certain embodiments, the chelator for .sup.89Zr is the ligand, 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) (HOPO), which exhibits equal or superior stability compared to DFO in chemical and biological assays across a period of several days in vivo. As shown in FIG. 1, the HOPO is an octadentate chelator that stabilizes chelation of radiolabels (e.g., .sup.89Zr). A bifunctional ligand comprising p-SCN-Bn-HOPO is shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5. Such a bifunctional ligand can eliminate (e.g., .sup.89Zr) loss from the chelate in vivo and reduce uptake in bone and non-target tissue. Therefore, the bifunctional HOPO ligand can facilitate safer and improved PET imaging with radiolabeled antibodies.
Claims
1. A composition comprising: an oxygen-bearing ligand comprising at least 8 coordination oxygens; a radiolabel associated with the oxygen-bearing ligand; and a spacer between the oxygen-bearing ligand and a conjugation functionality; wherein the conjugation functionality comprises a moiety for association of the oxygen-bearing ligand with a targeting agent; and wherein the oxygen-bearing ligand, the spacer, and the conjugation functionality together comprise ##STR00017##
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises the targeting agent and wherein the targeting agent is an antibody.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the antibody is a member selected from the group consisting of trastuzumab, rituximab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, alemtuzumab, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab, cetuximab, bevacizumab, panitumomab, J591, B43.13, AR9.6, 3F8, 8H9, huA33, and 5B1.
4. The composition of claim 2, wherein the composition comprises .sup.177Lu and/or .sup.89Zr.
5. A method for detecting and/or analyzing tumor cells, the method comprising: administering a quantity of the composition of claim 1 to a subject, wherein a portion of the quantity localizes at the tumor cells; and imaging the composition accumulated in a region of the subject within a time period no longer than 336 hours from the administering of the quantity of the composition.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the tumor cells are cells that express at least one marker of at least one of prostate cancer, lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, adenoma, adrenal cancer, basal cell carcinoma, bone cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer, bronchi cancer, cervical dysplasia, colon cancer, epidermoid carcinoma, Ewing's sarcoma, gallbladder cancer, gallstone tumor, giant cell tumor, glioblastoma multiforma, head cancer, hyperplasia, hyperplastic corneal nerve tumor, in situ carcinoma, intestinal ganglioneuroma, islet cell tumor, Kaposi's sarcoma, kidney cancer, larynx cancer, leiomyoma tumor, liver cancer, malignant carcinoid, malignant hypercalcemia, malignant melanomas, marfanoid habitus tumor, medullary carcinoma, metastatic skin carcinoma, mucosal neuromas, mycosis fungoide, neck cancer, neural tissue cancer, neuroblastoma, osteogenic sarcoma, osteosarcoma, ovarian tumor, pancreas cancer, parathyroid cancer, pheochromocytoma, primary brain tumor, rectum cancer, renal cell tumor, retinoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, seminoma, skin cancer, small-cell lung tumor, soft tissue sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, stomach cancer, thyroid cancer, topical skin lesion, veticulum cell sarcoma, Wilm's tumor, or combinations thereof.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein administering comprises injecting the quantity of the composition to the subject.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein the imaging is performed via positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein the composition comprises at least one europium(III) ion.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein imaging the composition comprises directing light to excite at least one group in the oxygen-bearing ligand of the composition; and detecting light emitted from the at least one europium(III) and/or other lanthanide ion.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the directed light has a wavelength from 300 nm to 400 nm.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the detected light comprises light in the visible and/or near infrared range.
13. The composition of claim 1, wherein the radiolabel is selected from the group consisting of .sup.89Zr, .sup.44Sc, .sup.47Sc, .sup.68Ga, .sup.177Lu, .sup.227Th, .sup.166Ho, .sup.90Y, .sup.153Sm, .sup.149Pm, .sup.161Tb, .sup.169Er, .sup.175Yb, .sup.161Ho, .sup.167Tm, .sup.142Pr, .sup.143Pr, .sup.145Pr .sup.149Pr, .sup.150Eu, .sup.159Gd, .sup.165Dy, .sup.176mLu, .sup.179Lu, .sup.142La, .sup.150Pm, .sup.156Eu, .sup.157Eu, and .sup.225Ac.
14. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises a plurality of radiolabels.
15. A method for detecting tumor cells, analyzing tumor cells, or both detecting and analyzing tumor cells, the method comprising: injecting a quantity of the composition of claim 2 to a subject, wherein a portion of the quantity localizes at the tumor cells; and imaging the composition accumulated in a region of the subject within a time period no longer than 336 hours from the administering of the quantity of the composition.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the antibody is a member selected from the group consisting of trastuzumab, rituximab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, alemtuzumab, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab, cetuximab, bevacizumab, panitumomab, J591, B43.13, AR9.6, 3F8, 8H9, huA33, and 5B1.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the radiolabel is selected from the group consisting of .sup.89Zr, .sup.44Sc, .sup.47Sc, .sup.68Ga, .sup.177Lu, .sup.227Th, .sup.166Ho, .sup.90Y, .sup.153Sm, .sup.149Pm, .sup.161Tb, .sup.169Er, .sup.175Yb, .sup.161Ho, .sup.167Tm, .sup.142Pr, .sup.143Pr, .sup.145Pr, .sup.149Pr, .sup.150Eu, .sup.159Gd, .sup.165Dy, .sup.176mLu, .sup.179Lu, .sup.142La, .sup.150Pm, .sup.156Eu, .sup.157Eu, and .sup.225Ac.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the tumor cells are cells that express at least one marker of at least one of prostate cancer, lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, adenoma, adrenal cancer, basal cell carcinoma, bone cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer, bronchi cancer, cervical dysplasia, colon cancer, epidermoid carcinoma, Ewing's sarcoma, gallbladder cancer, gallstone tumor, giant cell tumor, glioblastoma multiforma, head cancer, hyperplasia, hyperplastic corneal nerve tumor, in situ carcinoma, intestinal ganglioneuroma, islet cell tumor, Kaposi's sarcoma, kidney cancer, larynx cancer, leiomyoma tumor, liver cancer, malignant carcinoid, malignant hypercalcemia, malignant melanomas, marfanoid habitus tumor, medullary carcinoma, metastatic skin carcinoma, mucosal neuromas, mycosis fungoide, neck cancer, neural tissue cancer, neuroblastoma, osteogenic sarcoma, osteosarcoma, ovarian tumor, pancreas cancer, parathyroid cancer, pheochromocytoma, primary brain tumor, rectum cancer, renal cell tumor, retinoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, seminoma, skin cancer, small-cell lung tumor, soft tissue sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, stomach cancer, thyroid cancer, topical skin lesion, veticulum cell sarcoma, Wilm's tumor, or combinations thereof.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the antibody is a member selected from the group consisting of trastuzumab, rituximab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, alemtuzumab, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab, cetuximab, bevacizumab, panitumomab, J591, B43.13, AR9.6, 3F8, 8H9, huA33, and 5B1.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the radiolabel is selected from the group consisting of .sup.89Zr, .sup.44Sc, .sup.47Sc, .sup.68Ga, .sup.177Lu, .sup.227Th, .sup.166Ho, .sup.90Y, .sup.153Sm, .sup.149Pm, .sup.161Tb, .sup.169Er, .sup.175Yb, .sup.161Ho, .sup.167Tm, .sup.142Pr, .sup.143Pr, .sup.145Pr, .sup.149Pr, .sup.150Eu .sup.159Gd, .sup.165Dy, .sup.176mLu, .sup.179Lu, .sup.142La, .sup.150Pm, .sup.156Eu, .sup.157Eu, and .sup.225Ac.
21. The method of claim 15, wherein the imaging is performed via positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.
22. The method of claim 15, wherein the composition comprises at least one europium(III) ion; and wherein imaging the composition comprises directing light has a wavelength from 300 nm to 400 nm to excite at least one group in the oxygen-bearing ligand of the composition; and detecting visible light, near infrared light, or both, emitted from the at least one europium(III) ion.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1) Drawings are presented herein for illustration purposes, not for limitation. The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure can become more apparent and better understood by referring to the following description taken in conduction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(40) Throughout the description, where compositions are described as having, including, or comprising specific components, or where methods are described as having, including, or comprising specific steps, it is contemplated that, additionally, there are compositions of the present disclosure that consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited components, and that there are methods according to the present disclosure that consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited processing steps.
(41) It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain action is immaterial so long as the invention remains operable. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.
(42) The mention herein of any publication, for example, in the Background section, is not an admission that the publication serves as prior art with respect to any of the claims presented herein. The Background section is presented for purposes of clarity and is not meant as a description of prior art with respect to any claim.
(43) Described herein is a chelator for a radiometal (e.g., .sup.89Zr) for targeted PET imaging that is an alternative to DFO. In certain embodiments, the alternative chelator for .sup.89Zr is the ligand, 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) (HOPO), which exhibits equal or superior stability compared to DFO in chemical and biological assays across a period of several days in vivo. As shown in
(44) As described herein, a combination of density functional theory (DFT) calculations, in vitro and in vivo stability studies, competition studies with EDTA and metal challenges, and X-ray crystal structure analysis demonstrate the advantage of an octa-coordinate zirconium complex. Zr.sup.4+ is shown to preferentially form complexes with eight oxygen donors contained within four hydroxypyridinone groups. The HOPO ligand has decreased release of .sup.89Zr and, in certain embodiments, decreased accumulation in bone and improved PET imaging with .sup.89Zr-labeled antibodies.
(45) Zr(IV) chemistry is similar to plutonium (IV) (Pu.sup.4+) chemistry. Therefore, as described herein, ligands designed for in vivo Pu(IV) chelation therapy were developed for use with .sup.89Zr. Ligands with low pKa values resulting from the hydroxypyridinone functionalities in HOPO were selected as they facilitate binding at physiological pH, and their linear structure resulted in fast kinetics of .sup.89Zr.sup.4+ labeling at room temperature (RT).
(46) Although HOPO is superior to DFO in Zr chemistries due to at least the reasons stated above, there are other considerations in creating an optimized bifunctional ligand as shown in
(47) As described herein, the HOPO ligand labeled .sup.89Zr efficiently and with specific activity comparable to DFO. .sup.89Zr-HOPO exhibited equal or superior stability compared to DFO in all chemical and biological assays. Collectively, octadentate oxygen-bearing ligands provide stable .sup.89Zr complexes for the development of bifunctional ligands.
(48) Development of an Improved Bifunctional Chelate Based on Chemistry of Zr
(49) The complexity of aqueous Zr chemistry presents challenges to isolate and assess comparative stabilities of macroscopic Zr-HOPO complexes with the linker attached. Therefore, DFT calculations were performed to identify the impact of the position of the spacer in the HOPO chain on the stability and coordination of the overall Zr complexes was added. Inclusion of molecular dynamics simulations of the bifunctional ligand conjugated to the antibody can interrogate the availability of the ligand for radiometal complexation. Aspects of the present disclosure (e.g., synthesis, theory, radiolabeling, stability assays, biodistribution and imaging) provide a blueprint for ligand development for chelation of radiometals.
(50) Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to predict the most stable configurations of the Zr-ligand binding and provide strategies for alternative ligand design. The optimized .sup.89Zr-HOPO structure was found to be 31.8 kcal/mol more stable than .sup.89Zr-DFO.
(51) The bifunctional ligands described herein possess linkers of different sizes and solubilities and two different conjugation chemistries. In certain embodiments, selected bifunctional ligands provide optimized pharmacokinetics when conjugated to nanoparticles (e.g., cross-linked, short chain dextran nanoparticles or gold nanoparticles that are subsequently radiolabeled with .sup.89Zr for PET imaging).
(52) A chelator for .sup.89Zr: 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) or HOPO is described in Deri et al. Alternative chelator for .sup.89Zr radiopharmaceuticals: radiolabeling and evaluation of 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO). J Med Chem. 2014; 57(11):4849-60., the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. As described therein, an octadentate, oxygen-rich ligand for better chelation of zirconium was compared to hexadentate DFO. In order to initially test the HOPO ligand, the ligand itself, without any bifunctional linker, was synthesized. The HOPO ligand outperformed or matched DFO, with the most extreme difference being the markedly improved stability of .sup.89Zr-HOPO to transchelation by EDTA, especially at lower pH (
(53) In certain embodiments, libraries of bifunctional ligands with differing properties can expand the utility of .sup.89Zr into a number of different applications. For example, a library of bifunctional HOPO ligands varying the position where the linker is attached to the HOPO backbone, the length and composition of the spacer between the ligand and point of conjugation to the antibody, and the chemical functionality for conjugation to an antibody can be synthesized. The synthetic effort can be paired with DFT calculations and molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the solution phase behavior of the unmetallated bifunctional chelator, model the Zr(IV) coordination environment and compare the relative stabilities of the complexes in silico.
(54) Due to the results from 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) ligand alone, it was expected that the initial bifunctional derivative p-SCN-Bn-HOPO conjugated to trastuzumab (p-SCN-Bn-HOPO-Tz) would exhibit efficient radiolabeling and high specific activity. In certain embodiments, trastuzumab is chosen as an antibody for its usefulness in associating with breast cancer cells. However, it was observed that p-SCN-Bn-HOPO-Tz does not label as effectively as p-SCN-Bn-DFO-Tz and the specific activity was slightly lower. Without wishing to be bound to any theory, it was hypothesized that the difference in performance was due to the choice of linker used to attach the ligand to an antibody. Therefore, in certain embodiments of the present disclosure, a library of bifunctional variants of 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) can be created by using different linker chemistries in order to discover the optimal bifunctional ligand. The library can vary the position where the linker is attached to the ligand, the length and composition of the spacer between the ligand and the point of conjugation, and the chemical functionality included for conjugation to an antibody (
(55) There are seven unique positions along the backbone of the HOPO ligand (marked N1-C7 in
(56) The spacer connects the ligand to the functional group which conjugates to the antibody. Both its length and its chemical makeup can be altered to vary bifunctional ligand performance. The length of the spacer largely controls the proximity of the metal binding region of the ligand from the antibody. Too short of a spacer may not leave room for a metal to approach the ligand while too long of a spacer may introduce instability or an opportunity for cleavage. The chemical makeup of the linker can have an effect on the solubility of the chelator. A ligand that precipitates out of solution is not likely to achieve high levels of conjugation to the antibody, while one that has the steric bulk of the ligand attached very closely to the conjugating functionality may not have the space or flexibility to access the appropriate side chains of the antibody.
(57) The choice of functionality appended to the ligand for conjugation plays a role in determining the stability, solubility, and reactivity of the bifunctional ligand as well as the stability of the resulting ligand-antibody complex. As described herein, without exclusion of other possible functional moieties, the initial focus of functionality for conjugation to an antibody has been a benzyl isothiocyanate. This is due to its ease of use and so that the completed bifunctional ligand can be directly compared to the most commonly used DFO derivative: p-SCN-Bn-DFO. In addition to benzyl isothiocyanate, N-hydroxysuccinimide activated esters as an additional conjugation route can also be considered (
(58) To this end, altering the two different points of attachment (N1 and C2), three different types of spacers (e.g., a carbon chain, a polylysine chain, and a PEG chain), two different spacer lengths (e.g., short and long), and two different conjugation chemistries, the library, in this example, can comprise 16 different bifunctional chelators. In certain embodiments, variants of the isothiocyanate based bifunctional ligand can be made and improvements of the system can be evaluated. DFT calculations and molecular dynamics simulations can be pursued along with ligand synthesis and evaluation to provide comparative stabilities of the .sup.89Zr chelates and to understand the impact of spacer on radiolabeling, respectively.
(59) Synthesis and Characterization of p-SCN-Bn-HOPO
(60) The 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) ligand was developed into a bifunctional variant of the HOPO ligand for further evaluation and application in antibody-based PET imaging by synthesis of the related bifunctional chelator: p-SCN-Bn-HOPO (
(61) For example, initial attempts were made to attach a linker arm directly to one on the secondary amines of the original 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) ligand in order to make it bifunctional; however, efforts were initially unsuccessful. In certain embodiments, an alternative synthesis was developed to build the ligand by incorporating at least one linker arm directly into the ligand molecule (e.g., into the backbone chain of the molecule) during synthesis (
(62) p-SCN-BN-DFO was conjugated to antibodies through the formation of a thiourea bond with the amine sidechain of a lysine residue. The p-SCN-BN-HOPO ligand was designed to be attached in an identical protocol. Both ligands were conjugated to trastuzumab at a ratio of 5:1 ligand:antibody in the reaction mixture. The number of chelates per antibody was initially investigated by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry; however, the error was found to be too large to provide conclusive values. Subsequently, the number of chelates per antibody was determined to be 2.00.5 for p-SCN-BN-DFO and 2.80.2 for p-SCN-BN-HOPO through a simplified isotopic dilution assay.
(63) All compounds were radiolabeled under mild conditions using a .sup.89Zr-oxalate solution at pH 7 and room temperature. Reaction progress was monitored using radio ITLC. First, the bifunctional chelators p-SCN-Bn-HOPO and p-SCN-BN-DFO were radiolabeled on their own without being attached to any targeting vectors in order to compare each of the bifunctional chelators Zr binding ability. Both ligands labeled quantitatively within 1 h. This confirmed that the benzyl isothiocyanate linker arm did not interfere with the metal binding. Next, the chelator-modified trastuzumab complexes were radiolabeled under the same conditions. Both complexes labeled within 1-3 h at room temperature and achieved specific activities of approximately 2 mCi/mg. Radiolabeled antibody conjugates were purified via size exclusion chromatography and spin filtration.
(64) The viability of the .sup.89Zr-labeled trastuzumab complexes was assayed against BT474 cells to ensure that the conjugation of the chelators did not disrupt the biologically activity of the antibody. The .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab and .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab conjugates were found to have immunoreactive fractions of 88.62.1% and 92.46.8%, respectively.
(65) The .sup.89Zr-ligand complexes alone as well as the .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes were evaluated for stability in human serum at 37 C. Both .sup.89Zr-ligand complexes were stable in human serum (e.g., 97.70.2% of the p-SCN-Bn-DFO complex and 97.50.5% of the p-SCN-Bn-HOPO complex intact after 7 d). When the ligands were conjugated to trastuzumab and then labeled, both complexes demonstrated slight decreases in stability. For example, the .sup.89Zr-DFO-tratuzumab complex showed 94.70.7% stability and the .sup.89Zr-HOPO-tratuzumab complex showed stability between the .sup.89Zr-ligand complexes. The reason for the change in stability between the .sup.89Zr-ligand complexes and .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes is currently unknown, but, without wishing to be bound by theory, may be due to the influence of the antibody sidechains altering the chelation environment of the metal either during radiolabeling or during the serum incubation.
(66) As shown in
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 24 h 72 h 120 h 168 h HOPO DFO HOPO DFO HOPO DFO HOPO Blood 13.6 2.4 14.8 1.4 12.5 2.9 9.4 1.0 8.9 1.6 10.2 0.8 6.9 2.7 Tumor 29.0 11.4 22.4 14.3 54.7 19.5 51.4 10.4 68.8 18.8 95.0 16.7 70.4 23.5 Heart 3.7 0.4 3.9 0.7 2.7 0.5 3.7 2.3 2.4 0.5 3.0 0.3 1.7 0.6 Lungs 5.9 1.0 7.2 1.6 6.0 1.7 4.3 2.2 4.6 1.2 5.9 0.8 3.7 1.2 Liver 5.2 0.4 5.6 1.1 5.8 0.8 6.6 1.9 9.2 3.2 5.7 0.5 4.5 1.0 Spleen 3.6 1.2 2.8 0.7 2.9 1.1 2.3 0.2 1.9 0.2 3.3 0.3 1.8 0.7 Pancreas 1.6 0.1 1.5 0.5 1.4 0.4 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.2 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.4 Stomach 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.2 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.6 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 Sm. Int. 1.6 .04 2.1 0.6 1.4 0.2 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.2 1.2 0.4 .07 0.1 Lg. Int. 1.4 0.6 1.2 0.3 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.9 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.2 Kidneys 4.4 0.8 4.6 0.4 4.4 0.8 4.0 0.3 3.4 0.5 4.3 0.2 2.7 0.7 Muscle 1.3 0.3 1.1 0.2 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.1 0.8 0.1 Bone 2.6 0.6 2.4 0.7 2.7 0.1 5.5 1.7 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.7 2.5 0.5 Tail 2.9 0.6 2.4 0.9 2.2 0.4 1.7 0.3 1.6 0.1 1.9 0.2 1.6 0.5 168 h 216 h 336 h DFO HOPO DFO HOPO DFO Blood 7.1 1.4 3.5 2.2 4.8 0.9 4.3 1.8 4.4 0.9 Tumor 99.1 8.7 39.6 21.2 74.9 29.9 61.9 26.4 138.2 35.3 Heart 2.0 0.3 1.0 0.4 1.4 0.3 1.0 0.4 1.4 0.2 Lungs 4.8 1.0 1.7 0.9 3.0 0.4 2.1 0.8 3.4 1.0 Liver 6.6 2.1 4.7 0.9 4.9 2.2 3.4 1.9 7.2 1.8 Spleen 2.6 0.7 1.3 0.3 2.9 0.7 1.4 0.4 3.0 0.2 Pancreas 1.0 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.1 Stomach 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.2 Sm. Int. 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.1 Lg. Int. 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.1 Kidneys 4.0 0.3 1.9 0.6 2.6 0.3 1.8 0.5 3.1 0.8 Muscle 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.6 .01 Bone 8.1 1.4 2.5 0.3 10.7 1.3 2.4 0.3 17.0 4.1 Tail 1.8 0.4 1.1 0.4 1.7 0.4 0.9 0.3 1.5 0.2
(71) Without having to be bound to any theory, bone activity decreasing over time suggests that .sup.89Zr-HOPO is clearing and not mineralizing. .sup.89Zr-DFO clears exclusively through the kidneys. Significant uptake of .sup.89Zr-HOPO occurs in the gall bladder and intestines as well as the kidney. Without wishing to be bound to any theory, this suggests that .sup.89Zr-HOPO is cleared through both renal and hepatobiliary excretion. As .sup.89Zr-DFO is cleared exclusively through the kidneys and not through the hepatobiliary system, it is excreted from the body faster than .sup.89Zr-HOPO, as evidenced by the blood clearance curve (
(72)
(73) PET imaging was carried out in order to directly compare the in vivo behavior and pharmacokinetics of DFO- and HOPO-based .sup.89Zr-trastuzumab radioimmunoconjugates. Female, athymic nude mice with subcutaneous BT474 xenografts in their right shoulders were injected with either .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab or .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab (n=4 for each compound) and imaged over 9 d. The resulting images showed good tumor uptake for both compounds, but with a marked decrease in the appearance of bone uptake for the .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab images (
(74) Trastuzumab (Tz) antibody was conjugated to p-SCN-Bn-HOPO and p-SCN-Bn-DFO, and the conjugation efficiencies were compared. Although the complex comprising p-SCN-Bn-HOPO and Tz (HOPO-Tz complex) achieved satisfactory radiolabeling yields, its conjugation efficiency was lower compared to the conjugation efficiency of the complex comprising p-SCN-Bn-DFO and Tz (DFO-Tz complex). Although HOPO-Tz complexes had on average more chelates per antibody than the DFO-Tz complexes, the HOPO-Tz complexes only showed specific activities up to about 2.5 mCi/mg (compared to a specific activity of 4 mCi/mg for the DFO-Tz complexes). This difference in specific activity does not necessarily hinder the application of the HOPO chelator. Moreover, the difference can be overcome through optimization of the linker portion of the bifunctional chelator. The position, length, spacer type, and conjugation functionality of the linker can be systematically altered to create a library of possible bifunctional ligands. These variants can be evaluated both in vitro for favorable radiolabeling properties and in vivo for stability and biological applicability.
(75) Quantitative and Comparative Evaluation the In Vivo Behavior and Pharmacokinetics of Complexes
(76) Complexes can be screened with in vivo tumor models to determine their pharmacokinetics and stabilities. .sup.89Zr-ligand-trastuzumab complexes can be evaluated (e.g., as a well-studied model system) to determine their stability, biodistribution, and overall utility as PET imaging agents compared to .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab.
(77) For example, the complexes can be screened in in vivo tumor HER2 positive and negative models to determine their behavior and stability using small animal PET/CT imaging. The tumor uptake and pharmacokinetics of the .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes can be determined. The .sup.89Zr-ligand-trastuzumab complexes can be evaluated to determine their stability, biodistribution, and overall utility as imaging agents.
(78)
(79)
(80) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 10 min 1 h 4 h Zr-HOPO Zr-DFO Zr-HOPO Zr-DFO Zr-HOPO Blood 3.24 0.66 5.11 0.90 0.17 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.05 0.04 Heart 1.57 0.22 2.17 0.62 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.01 Lung 1.07 0.17 2.16 1.08 0.17 0.09 0.14 0.04 0.08 0.01 Gall Bladder 6.61 2.87 1.57 0.25 6.94 3.38 0.47 0.14 1.00 0.41 Liver 3.29 0.75 0.88 0.49 0.22 0.09 0.24 0.07 0.13 0.01 Spleen 0.31 0.04 0.37 0.22 0.09 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.01 Stomach 1.22 0.39 0.62 0.28 0.30 0.15 1.10 0.51 0.50 0.74 Large Intestine 0.26 0.15 0.43 0.13 0.09 0.06 0.02 0.01 7.17 2.15 Small Intestine 5.99 1.18 0.94 0.16 1.11 0.35 0.35 0.17 0.12 0.13 Kidney 9.46 2.71 14.44 5.88 1.05 0.51 1.39 0.55 0.40 0.14 Bladder 2.04 1.06 2.50 0.48 0.73 0.36 2.47 1.30 0.58 0.27 Muscle 0.36 0.06 0.73 0.56 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.06 Bone 1.04 0.44 0.43 0.10 0.29 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.23 0.12 Tail 4.25 1.46 5.13 2.92 0.81 0.34 0.26 0.05 0.29 0.18 4 h 12 h 24 h Zr-DFO Zr-HOPO Zr-DFO Zr-HOPO Zr-DFO Blood 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 Heart 0.03 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.01 Lung 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.01 Gall Bladder 0.26 0.15 2.45 1.02 0.16 0.14 1.15 0.59 0.23 0.21 Liver 0.12 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.11 0.02 Spleen 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.01 Stomach 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 Large Intestine 0.62 0.55 0.10 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 Small Intestine 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 Kidney 1.10 0.44 0.53 0.23 0.36 0.13 0.51 0.29 1.12 0.33 Bladder 1.22 0.77 0.54 0.26 0.69 0.31 0.28 0.14 0.56 0.41 Muscle 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.00 Bone 0.04 0.02 0.25 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.17 0.03 0.06 0.01 Tail 0.14 0.08 0.11 0.04 0.13 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.08 0.02
(81) Biodistribution data confirmed the significantly lower bone activity of the HOPO conjugate, measuring 17.04.1% ID/g in the bone for the .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab while the .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab only had 2.40.3% ID/g (e.g., reduction by a factor of approximately 7).
(82) The amount of activity seen in the bone with .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab is consistently less than the residual bone activity which means it is possible that there is no specific bone accumulation since the % ID/g values do not increase over time (
(83) The 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) ligand exhibits excellent stability for .sup.89Zr complexes. For example, p-SCN-Bn-HOPO achieved specific activities of 2 mCi/mg, was 90% stable through a 7 d incubation in human serum, and .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab exhibited reduced bone uptake (e.g., more than 7 times compared to .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab). While the absolute uptake in BT474 breast cancer tumors was just over 2 times higher for .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, the tumor-to-bone ratio was more than 3 times higher for .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab. This improved contrast between tumor and bone can improve the detection of bone metastasis and improve the general clarity of the images. Without wishing to be bound to any theory, the lower bone uptake furthermore demonstrates that p-SCN-Bn-HOPO ligand forms a more stable complex with .sup.89Zr.sup.4+ than p-SCN-Bn-DFO, suggesting a reduced release of free .sup.89Zr.sup.4+ in vivo. For example,
(84) Another possible avenue for investigation is the application of p-SCN-Bn-HOPO toward the chelation of other metals, whether radioactive or otherwise, as therapeutic agents. As the 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) ligand was originally made for the purpose of chelating actinides, it follows that the bifunctional ligand p-SCN-Bn-HOPO might also be useful with radiolabels that have medical applications, including but not limited to the actinides and lanthanides. In certain embodiments, a bifunctional ligand where one functionality allows for complexing to a radiolabel and the other allows for complexing with a targeting agent (e.g., an antibody) allows for targeted radioimmunotherapy (RIT) to be administered to a subject (e.g., by injection). In certain embodiments, actinium-225, thorium-227 or lutetium-177 are used as radiolabels for complexing with p-SCN-Bn-HOPO for RIT. Actinium-225 and thorium-227 both emit alpha particles and lutetium-177 emits beta particles that are all suitable for RIT. The thermodynamic stability constant of Th-HOPO has been determined and is comparable to that of Zr-HOPO suggesting that .sup.227Th can be a good candidate for evaluation with a p-SCN-Bn-HOPO-antibody system. Furthermore, .sup.225Ac is at the forefront of radioimmunotherapy due to its decay chain containing many other radioactive daughter nuclides which increase the therapeutic payload of the RIT agent. Scandium-44 and gallium-68 are commonly utilized radiolabels for PET. In certain embodiments, scandium-44 or gallium-68 are used as radiolabels in complexes with p-SCN-Bn-HOPO for PET imaging.
(85) Lutetium-177 (.sup.177Lu) is a radionuclide that emits a beta particle (0.5 MeV .sub.max, t.sub.1/2: 6.7 day) and two low energy y rays (208 keV, 10%; 113 kev, 6%). Lu-177 is used for radiotherapy. In certain embodiments, HOPO and p-SCN-Bn-HOPO can complex with Lutetium-177. The ligand, DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid), is normally employed for complexing Lu-177 for peptides and antibodies for radiotherapy. In certain embodiments, HOPO, when conjugated to an antibody, can be used to stably complex .sup.177Lu in vivo in an effort to produce a single antibody conjugate that can be radiolabeled with .sup.89Zr for in vivo PET imaging and/or .sup.177Lu for targeted radiotherapy. Thus, in certain embodiments, the stability of the .sup.177Lu complex in biological media, chelator competition, and metal ion competition studies were conducted. Secondly, in vivo studies to determine the in vivo biodistribution of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO complex was carried out. Finally, .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab was prepared to determine the in vivo stability in both SKOV3 tumor-bearing nude female mice and healthy female mice in order to determine the stability in a longer circulating animal model.
(86) Comparison of HOPO to DOTA
(87) Initially, the chelating agents HOPO and DOTA ligands were evaluated with .sup.177Lu. HOPO was labeled with a constant amount of .sup.177Lu and varying concentrations of HOPO to determine the optimal labeling ratio of lutetium to HOPO (
(88) Once the labeling conditions were decided, the .sup.177Lu-HOPO and .sup.177Lu-DOTA complex stabilities were compared in human serum, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle High Glucose (DME HG) cell culture media, EDTA solution buffered at various pH's, 10-fold excess of possible competing metal ions, and in 0.5 M tris buffer in the presence of hydroxyapatite. The results of these studies are shown in
(89) While in vitro assays suggest lower stability for the Lu-HOPO complex, the in vivo assays are the most important tests. Therefore, healthy female nude mice were injected with each of the complexes in order to determine their relative in vivo stabilities. The results are tabulated in Table 3 and are shown as graphs in
(90) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 0.5 h 1 h 4 h 1 d 6 d .sup.177Lu-HOPO Blood 0.0462 0.0408 0.025 0.034 0.085 0.150 0.00012 0.00013 0.00003 0.00005 Heart 0.0334 0.0373 0.540 0.284 0.011 0.006 0.00082 0.00046 0.00085 0.00031 Lungs 1.1718 1.8701 1.917 1.084 0.050 0.034 0.01064 0.00462 0.00608 0.00276 Liver 0.9739 0.6883 0.667 0.276 0.060 0.041 0.00924 0.00233 0.00454 0.00060 Spleen 0.0596 0.0508 0.065 0.017 0.017 0.013 0.00302 0.00217 0.00074 0.00049 Pancreas 0.0362 0.0285 0.179 0.015 0.010 0.009 0.00065 0.00034 0.00006 0.00012 Stomach 1.7917 1.3509 0.659 0.356 0.023 0.014 0.02101 0.03101 0.00052 0.00025 S. Intestine 26.3302 2.6395 23.255 3.542 1.283 0.843 0.05965 0.06206 0.00032 0.00009 L. Intestine 0.0666 0.0473 0.046 0.014 24.419 1.444 0.93994 0.46206 0.00214 0.00015 Kidneys 0.7883 0.2897 0.767 0.303 0.575 0.113 0.15524 0.03810 0.00325 0.00096 Muscle 0.0277 0.0216 0.020 0.010 0.025 0.003 0.00072 0.00036 0.00022 0.00039 Bone 0.0171 0.0013 0.019 0.010 0.017 0.009 0.00257 0.00100 0.00221 0.00194 Bladder 0.3588 0.2743 0.162 0.058 0.074 0.024 0.01997 0.00740 0.01705 0.00872 Carcass 0.00112 0.00016 .sup.177Lu-DOTA Blood 0.407 0.179 0.0287 0.0038 0.0011 0.0003 0.00020 0.00011 0.00003 0.00006 Heart 0.142 0.069 0.0142 0.0016 0.0052 0.0016 0.00270 0.00067 0.00158 0.00062 Lungs 0.298 0.131 0.0444 0.0175 0.0080 0.0044 0.00410 0.00192 0.00142 0.00102 Liver 0.199 0.033 0.1121 0.0174 0.0614 0.0205 0.03690 0.00538 0.01724 0.00259 Spleen 0.103 0.019 0.0410 0.0100 0.0249 0.0009 0.02143 0.00625 0.01313 0.00408 Pancreas 0.080 0.037 0.0143 0.0050 0.0068 0.0038 0.00337 0.00062 0.00120 0.00048 Stomach 0.120 0.035 0.0230 0.0174 0.0038 0.0026 0.00294 0.00146 0.00045 0.00010 S. Intestine 0.142 0.038 0.0722 0.0209 0.0209 0.0180 0.02037 0.01362 0.00100 0.00011 L. Intestine 0.056 0.025 0.0129 0.0015 0.0361 0.0403 0.05022 0.03098 0.00140 0.00017 Kidneys 1.121 0.490 1.4402 1.2901 0.2398 0.1571 0.22256 0.04562 0.04311 0.01362 Muscle 0.085 0.037 0.0219 0.0154 0.0044 0.0007 0.00281 0.00151 0.00067 0.00046 Bone 0.090 0.026 0.0491 0.0349 0.0060 0.0007 0.00484 0.00076 0.00412 0.00104 Bladder 0.691 0.116 0.2962 0.1869 0.1088 0.0148 0.15991 0.07394 0.11857 0.05899 Carcass 0.0025 0.0003
(91) From these results, the Lu-HOPO complex is excreted via the hepatobiliary clearance pathway with minimal kidney clearance; whereas, the Lu-DOTA complex is excreted mostly via the renal-urinary clearance pathway. The Log D.sub.7.4, measured for the two complexes in octanol/PBS, are consistent with these results: the Lu-HOPO complex (Log D.sub.7.4=2.430.05) presents as more lipophilic than the Lu-DOTA complex (Log D.sub.7.4=4.10.4). By 1 d post injection (p.i.), the majority of both complexes are cleared. Interestingly, the carcasses of the mice at 6 d p.i. were collected and showed slightly more residual Lu-DOTA (0.0440.004% ID in carcass; 0.0920.009% ID in all tissues and carcass) remaining in the mice than Lu-HOPO (0.0220.002% ID in carcass; 0.0360.002% ID in all tissues and carcass). The additional activity remaining in the mice injected with Lu-DOTA resulted in greater bone uptake for Lu-DOTA (0.0040.001% ID/g) compared to Lu-HOPO (0.00220.0019% ID/g) at 6 d p.i. Since the bone is the most likely accumulation site for lost .sup.177Lu, the organ ratios were compared to bone and are tabulated in Table 4.
(92) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Ratios 0.5 h 1 h 4 h 1 d 6 d .sup.177Lu-HOPO Muscle/Bone 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 1.4 0.8 0.28 0.18 0.10 0.20 Blood/Bone 3 2 1 2 5 9 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 Liver/Bone 60 40 40 20 4 3 3.6 1.7 2.1 1.8 S. Intestine/Bone 1500 200 1300 700 80 60 20 30 0.14 0.13 L. Intestine/Bone 4 3 2 2 1400 700 400 200 1.0 0.9 Kidney/Bone 46 17 40 30 34 19 60 30 1.5 1.4 Carcass/Bone 0.5 1.4 .sup.177Lu-DOTA Muscle/Bone 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.74 0.15 0.6 0.3 0.16 0.12 Blood/Bone 5 2 0.6 0.4 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.007 0.015 Liver/Bone 2.2 0.7 2.3 1.7 10 4 7.6 1.6 4.2 1.2 S. Intestine/Bone 1.6 0.6 1.5 1.1 3 3 4 3 0.24 0.07 L. Intestine/Bone 0.6 0.3 0.26 0.19 6 7 10 7 0.34 0.10 Kidney/Bone 13 7 30 30 40 30 46 12 10 4 Carcass/Bone 0.60 0.17 .sup.89Zr-HOPO* Ratios 0.17 h 1 h 4 h 1 d Muscle/Bone 0.35 0.16 0.34 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.35 0.09 Blood/Bone 3.1 1.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.12 0.02
(93) The ratios show residual kidney and greater liver uptake for the Lu-DOTA than Lu-HOPO. Additionally, similar muscle/bone and blood/bone ratios were determined for Lu-HOPO when compared to Zr-HOPO at 1 d p.i. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, these results indicated that the Lu-HOPO complex was stable enough for further in vivo studies.
(94) Conjugation, Radiolabeling, and In Vitro Analysis of the Bifunctional Ligand-Antibody Conjugate.
(95) In order to assess the stability of the Lu-HOPO complex for longer periods of time in vivo, the bifunctional HOPO was conjugated to trastuzumab (HOPO-Tz) to obtain 0.950.08 HOPO ligands/antibody (MALDI analysis). The HOPO-Tz was radiolabeled with .sup.177Lu (.sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz) with a specific activity of 4-5 mCi/mg (148-185 MBq/mg) and >98% radiochemical purity. The .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz was eluted from the PD-10 column in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 6 mg/mL L-ascorbic acid. To assess the biological stability of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz, 10% of the recovered .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz was incubated at 37 C. in human serum. The amount of intact .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz over time was assessed by radio-ITLC and showed a decrease over the course of 6 days (933% intact at 1 d; 892% intact at 3 d; 822% intact at 6 d). The decrease in stability of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz complex relative to .sup.177Lu-HOPO is similar to that which was observed for .sup.89Zr-HOPO-Tz relative to .sup.89Zr-HOPO. .sup.1b
(96) Using a protocol similar to the .sup.177Lu-HOPO hydroxyapatite study, .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz was shown to be >97% intact over the course of 6 d. The major difference was that the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz stuck to the walls of the microcentrifuge tubes that were used in the assay as well as remaining in solution. Thus, a concerted effort was made to remove all of the hydroxyapatite from the microcentrifuge tube in these analyses and the activity remaining in the microcentrifuge tube was summed with the filtrate to obtain the total .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz.
(97) To assess the tumor targeting ability of the radioimmunoconjugate, a saturation binding assay was performed with SKOV-3 cells (human ovarian adenocarcinoma, HER2 expressing cell line). The saturation binding assay indicated that 86.00.7% (on ice) or 892% (at 37 C.) of the radioimmunoconjugate was bound to the cell pellet. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, binding about 85-95% for this assay indicates that the modified antibody targets cell surface receptors at a level similar to the unmodified antibody.
(98) In Vivo Analysis of .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz
(99) In order to determine if the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz was stable for in vivo delivery of .sup.177Lu, the radioimmunoconjugate was administered to a group of SKOV-3 tumor-bearing female nude mice (four with approximately 500 Ci (18.5 MBq) or 9.54 g for SPECT imaging; eight with approximately 50 Ci (1.85 MBq) or 0.954 g for biodistribution) and healthy female nude mice (thirty with approximately 50 Ci (1.85 MBq) or 0.954 g for biodistribution only). The latter group was investigated because there would not be a sink for the radioimmunoconjugate within the mouse; thus, the antibody would circulate for longer and would have the maximum metabolism of the construct. The major organ of interest to show instability was the bone and residual carcass because, without wishing to be bound to any particular theory, any free .sup.177Lu should accumulate in the bone. The biodistribution results for these mice are in Table 5 and shown graphically in
(100) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 1 d 3 d 7 d Tumor- Tumor- Tumor- 10 d 14 d 21 d Organ bearing Healthy bearing Healthy bearing* Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Blood 14.7 1.6 15.2 1.3 12.9 0.3 12.0 1.9 10.0 0.9 7 3 8 2 4.2 1.4 3 2 Heart 4.8 1.0 4.2 0.4 3.4 0.6 3.4 1.0 2.8 0.6 2.1 0.9 2.3 0.5 1.4 0.3 0.9 0.6 Lung 8 2 8.2 0.5 6.33 0.06 6.2 1.6 4.6 1.1 4.2 0.9 4.3 1.0 2.4 0.5 1.6 1.2 Liver 6.2 0.7 7.1 0.6 7.6 1.1 9 2 8.0 1.2 8 3 7 2 7 2 8 2 Spleen 3.8 0.8 4.0 0.6 3.9 1.0 4.0 1.0 12 3 4.5 1.1 4.9 1.1 4.0 0.8 3.6 1.9 Pancreas 1.32 0.10 1.56 0.13 1.58 0.17 1.2 0.3 0.84 0.17 0.9 0.3 0.80 0.18 0.54 0.11 0.32 0.19 Stomach 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.56 0.17 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.67 0.18 0.86 0.15 0.47 0.05 0.4 0.2 S. Intestine 1.3 0.3 1.29 0.14 1.10 0.15 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.54 0.12 0.4 0.2 L. Intestine 0.98 0.16 0.96 0.07 1.14 0.18 0.9 0.2 1.0 0.3 0.67 0.07 0.77 0.12 0.50 0.07 0.28 0.09 Kidneys 3.7 0.6 4.6 0.4 3.9 0.8 3.8 0.7 3.4 0.8 2.8 0.8 2.8 0.4 1.8 0.3 1.2 0.5 Muscle 0.90 0.03 1.17 0.18 0.9 0.2 0.64 0.13 0.70 0.14 0.64 0.16 0.57 0.14 0.34 0.10 0.15 0.09 Bone 2.2 0.3 2.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 2.3 0.2 3.2 0.6 2.5 0.5 2.5 0.4 2.64 0.16 3.2 0.6 Skin 4.5 0.5 4.8 0.5 4.6 0.6 4.6 1.3 5.2 0.8 4.0 0.4 3.9 0.7 3.7 1.0 3.0 1.1 Carcass 1.27 0.13 2.6 0.2 2.34 0.15 2.39 0.15 1.23 0.12 2.1 0.3 1.9 0.3 1.45 0.16 1.2 0.4 Tumor 10 2 17 7 25 6
(101) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 1 d 3d 7 d 10 d 14 d 21 d Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Blood 7.4 1.2 5.2 1.0 2.8 1.3 3.1 1.0 1.6 0.5 0.8 0.8 Heart 2.0 0.3 1.5 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.52 0.14 0.27 0.18 Lungs 4.0 0.6 2.7 0.7 1.7 0.5 1.7 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.4 Liver 3.4 0.6 4.0 1.0 3.1 1.3 2.9 1.0 2.6 0.8 2.5 0.9 Spleen 1.9 0.4 1.7 0.5 1.8 0.5 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.3 1.2 0.6 Pancreas 0.76 0.12 0.54 0.14 0.34 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.20 0.04 0.10 0.06 Stomach 0.47 0.14 0.40 0.15 0.26 0.09 0.34 0.08 0.18 0.02 0.13 0.07 S. Intestine 0.63 0.11 0.46 0.12 0.28 0.10 0.37 0.11 0.21 0.05 0.12 0.07 L. Intestine 0.47 0.07 0.38 0.10 0.26 0.06 0.31 0.07 0.19 0.03 0.09 0.03 Kidneys 2.2 0.4 1.7 0.3 1.1 0.4 1.1 0.2 0.69 0.14 0.37 0.19 Muscle 0.57 0.12 0.28 0.06 0.25 0.08 0.23 0.07 0.13 0.04 0.05 0.03 Skin 2.3 0.4 2.0 0.6 1.6 0.3 1.5 0.4 1.4 0.4 0.9 0.4 Carcass 1.3 0.2 1.04 0.12 0.8 0.2 0.76 0.18 0.55 0.07 0.38 0.15
(102) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Tissue/Bone Ratios Tumor/Tissue Ratios 1 d Tumor 3 d Tumor 7 d Tumor 1 d Tumor 3 d Tumor 7 d Tumor Blood 6.8 1.2 5.8 1.0 3.1 0.7 0.65 0.16 1.3 0.6 2.5 0.6 Heart 2.2 0.5 1.5 0.4 0.9 0.3 2.0 0.6 5 2 9 3 Lungs 3.7 1.1 2.8 0.5 1.4 0.4 1.2 0.4 2.7 1.1 5.5 1.8 Liver 2.8 0.5 3.4 0.8 2.5 0.6 1.6 0.4 2.3 1.0 3.1 0.8 Spleen 1.8 0.4 1.8 0.5 3.7 1.2 2.5 0.7 4 2 2.1 0.7 Pancreas 0.61 0.10 0.70 0.14 0.26 0.07 7.3 1.6 11 5 30 9 Stomach 0.49 0.15 0.25 0.08 0.26 0.08 9 3 31 16 30 10 S. Intestine 0.62 0.16 0.49 0.11 0.30 0.11 7 2 16 7 26 10 L. Intestine 0.45 0.10 0.51 0.12 0.33 0.11 10 3 15 7 24 8 Kidneys 1.7 0.4 1.7 0.5 1.1 0.3 2.6 0.7 4 2 7 2 Muscle 0.41 0.06 0.38 0.12 0.22 0.06 11 2 20 10 36 11 Bone 4.4 1.1 8 3 8 2 Skin 2.1 0.4 2.1 0.4 1.6 0.4 2.1 0.5 3.8 1.6 4.8 1.3 Carcass 0.58 0.10 1.04 0.19 0.38 0.08 Tumor 4.4 1.1 8 3 8 2
(103) Additionally, the single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) images at 1, 3, and 7 d p.i. of one of the mice that received an imaging dose are shown in
(104) Besides the accumulation in the bone, the carcasses from the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-Tz studies were collected and both an overall % ID/g and % ID from the entire mouse (Table 8) and the % ID/g (Table 5) of just the remaining carcasses were calculated. These results show that in certain embodiments, in both the healthy and the tumor-bearing mice, the .sup.177Lu is being excreted rather than retained by the mouse. In certain embodiments, the % ID of the mice injected with 10 times the construct for imaging (7 d tumor-bearing mice) have much lower % ID remaining in the mice compared to the healthy mice at 7 d p.i.
(105) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 t (d) % ID/g % ID Healthy 1 2.86 0.2 76.0 1.5 3 2.67 0.18 68 3 7 2.34 0.14 63 3 10 2.2 0.2 56 5 14 1.67 0.19 45 4 21 1.5 0.4 41 8 SKOV-3 tumor-bearing 1 2.8 0.3 75 7 3 2.68 0.16 70 4 7 2.0 0.2 46 3
(106) In certain embodiments, p-SCN-Bn-HOPO is used with europium(III) or other lanthanide ions for optical imaging. In these embodiments, light of wavelength 300-400 nm excite the hydroxypyridinone groups for energy transfer to the Eu(III) (or other lanthanide ion). After excitation, the Eu(III) emits light in the 660 nm range. Other lanthanides can emit in the visible or near infrared (IR) range.
(107) Materials and Methods
(108) Chemical Synthesis
(109) Attachment to an amine can be accomplished using the original spermine backbone at N1 as N5 is already a tertiary amine. Attachment to a carbon requires the synthesis of a new nitrogen backbone with a carbon sidechain. An initial scheme for positioning the linker off C2 is to build the ligand's backbone using commercially available Fmoc-(R)-3-amino-4-(4-nitro-phenyl)-butyric acid in a reaction with spermidine to add a nitrobenzyl group to the C2 position. This nitro group can then be converted to an amine which can be used to attach a spacer in a similar fashion as done with the N1 position.
(110) The construction of the spacer can be partially determined by the attachment point since it can either have to react with an amine if attached at position N1 or be built off whatever carbon side-chain is used to attach at position C2. For linkers attached at N1, the length of the spacer can be easily altered because there are more commercially available reagents for reaction with the amine of spermine. However, for attachment at C2, the starting materials need to be synthesized for reaction with spermidine to add the spacer to the backbone. Spacers composed of alkyl chain, polylysine chain, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) chain can be evaluated. The polylysines and PEG chains improve the water solubility and facilitate conjugation. Commercially available heterobifunctional PEG cross linkers can be used in the synthesis of the PEG derivatives with one end attached to the ligand and the other to the conjugating functionality. Both of the functional groups proposed for conjugation to an antibody react with the amine of a lysine residue. The choice of conjugation chemistries can broaden the generated libraries in order to increase the opportunity of finding an improved functional ligand. Attaching the spacer at the N1 position (e.g., the first position of the chain) or at the C2 position (e.g., the second position of the chain) can influence the radiolabeling of the chelator to Zr or other metals and the stability of the construct.
(111)
(112) As shown in
(113) In certain embodiments, the bifunctional ligands are tested by conjugation to trastuzumab, radiolabeling with .sup.89Zr, and investigation of the chemical and biological properties.
(114)
(115) At least one purpose behind a bifunctional ligand is to both bind a metal and form an attachment to a targeting vector (e.g., an antibody). After synthesis of the ligands, the ligands can be conjugated to an antibody and radiolabeling the complex. In certain embodiments, trastuzumab can be selected due to the availability of the antibody and the abundance of previous PET imaging data. Moreover, trastuzumab has been previously been tested when labeled with .sup.89Zr-DFO so that direct comparisons can be made between the new ligands and the established standard.
(116) Characterization
(117) The characterization of the ligands described herein can include elemental analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), mass spectrometry (MS), and high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The MS studies can include electrospray ionization MS (ESI-MS), high resolution MS (HRMS), and liquid chromatography MS (LCMS).
(118) HPLC purification produced final products as well as many intermediates described herein. The purification of these compounds can be carried out largely using a Symmetry C18 prep column (100 {acute over ()}, 5 m, 19 mm100 mm, Waters, Milford, Mass.).
(119) When monitoring the reaction by ITLC (
(120) Computational Studies
(121) DFT-based computations have been used previously to identify the lowest energy conformation of Zr(IV) complexes. Further improvements in the method and basis set choices for Zn(IV) can yield an enhanced ability to determine (1) equilibrium structures of the complexes and their relative energies, and (2) the impact of the linking group attachment on the Zr(IV)-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) complex. Thus, several methods and basis sets to determine the computational level required to obtain reliable structures and energetics for Zr(IV) model complexes can be determined. Follow-up can then determine the effect of methylating the chelator at various attachment points (e.g., N1-C7 in
(122)
(123) As the HOPO-trastuzumab has shown less efficient radiolabeling than DFO-trastuzumab, molecular dynamics simulations of the bifunctional ligands conjugated to the antibody (but without the metal center) can be performed to investigate the effect of the linker (e.g., size and functional groups) on the availability of the ligand toward radiometal complexation. These tests can be done in gas and solution phases (both implicit and explicit) to elucidate the effects of the various linkers on the structure and dynamics of the overall bifunctional chelator.
(124) The conjugation of p-SCN-Bn-DFO to an antibody is typically carried out at pH 9 at 37 C. in 1 h, and the final product is purified through size exclusion chromatography using pre-packed PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare).
(125) The time and temperature of the radiolabeling reaction can be evaluated for each ligand-antibody complex. The reactions can be monitored using radio-ITLC with salicylic acid impregnated instant thin-layer chromatography paper (ITLC-SA, Agilent Technologies) and 50 mM EDTA at pH 5.5 as the elutant.
(126) The suitability of the bifunctional ligands can be evaluated by their ability to be (1) conjugated to an antibody, (2) whether they achieve a radiochemical yield (e.g., greater than 95%) and specific activity (e.g., greater than or equal to 2 mCi/mg) when radiolabeled, and (3) the stability of the radiolabeled complex. The stoichiometry of the conjugation of the ligand to the antibody can be evaluated using standard radiometric isotopic dilution as well as mass spectrometry studies. Furthermore, in vitro immunoreactivity assays can be carried out on the .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes to ensure that the conjugation does not affect the ability of the antibody to bind its target. Radiolabeling can be carried out within an hour at room temperature. Radiochemical yield can be measured by radio-ITLC on the crude reaction mixture while specific activity can be calculated after purification of the final complex. The stability of the .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes can be evaluated in both phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and human serum at 37 C. over a period of 7 days. All parameters can be measured and compared to those of .sup.89Zr-DFO-antibody complexes as a standard.
(127) Serum stability and immunoreactivity of .sup.89Zr-complexes were evaluated. To determine the stability in serum, .sup.89Zr-complexes were incubated in human serum at 37 C. for 7 d. The percentage of intact species was monitored by ITLC (Table 9).
(128) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Complex Ligand Only Ligand-mAb p-SCN-Bn-DFO 97.7 0.2% 94.7 0.7% p-SCN-Bn-HOPO 97.5 0.5% 89.2 0.9%
(129) To calculate the immunoreactivity, .sup.89Zr-complexes were incubated with BT474 cells for 1 h (Table 10).
(130) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Complex Immunoreactive Fraction .sup.89Zr-DFO-Trastuzumab 88.6 2.1% .sup.89Zr-HOPO-Trastuzumab 92.4 6.8%
(131) .sup.89Zr-ligand-mAb complexes can be characterized with radio-ITLC, HPLC, and size exclusion chromatography as well as checked for stability and immunoreactivity. Radio-ITLC analysis can be measured on a Bioscan AR-2000 radio-ITLC plate reader using Winscan Radio-TLC software (Bioscan Inc., Washington, D.C.). All stability tests can be carried out in triplicate.
(132) The pharmacokinetics of the .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes can be evaluated with PET imaging, acute biodistribution studies, and autoradiography in xenograft tumor-bearing mice. The number of mice required for the imaging and biodistribution experiences encompassed can be based on the ultimate number of bifunctionalized ligands that are developed and shown to effectively radiolabel as ligand-antibody conjugates. In certain embodiments, tests can be carried out as described in Table 11. In this embodiment, 16 total new bifunctional chelators can be developed and then the most promising quarter can be taken through to in vivo evaluation. These four .sup.89Zr-ligand-trastuzumab complexes can then undergo imaging and biodistribution studies in tumor bearing mice. A group of mice, n=5, can be tested for a time point for biodistribution for each radiotracer with an additional group for imaging. Additionally, a full set of mice can be used for comparative imaging and biodistribution with .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab.
(133) Table 11 shows that each group can be imaged with .sup.89Zr-trastuzumab with varying bifunctional ligands and 150 total mice can be used. Bilateral BT-474 (HER2/neu positive) and MDA-MB-468 (HER2/neu negative positive) can be used for this study.
(134) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Radiotracer (total animal #) # mice per Group Time points .sup.89Zr-BH1-trastuzumab (30) 5 6, 24, 72, 120, 168 h .sup.89Zr-BH2-trastuzumab (30) 5 6, 24, 72, 120, 168 h .sup.89Zr-BH3-trastuzumab (30) 5 6, 24, 72, 120, 168 h .sup.89Zr-BH4-trastuzumab (30) 5 6, 24, 72, 120, 168 h .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (30) 5 6, 24, 72, 120, 168 h
(135) As trastuzumab can be used as the basis for the .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes, immunoPET and biodistribution experiments can be conducted using female, athymic nu/nu mice bearing sub-cutaneous BT-474 (HER2/neu positive) and/or MDA-MB-468 (HER2/neu negative) tumor xenografts.
(136) .sup.177Lu-HOPO, .sup.177Lu-DOTA, were evaluated in healthy nude female mice (8-10 weeks old, Charles River Laboratory). In certain embodiments, the mice (4 per group) were injected with approximately 50 Ci each (.sup.177Lu) and dissected at 0.5, 1, 4, 24, and 144 h. Aliquots of the injectate (10 L) were weighed and counted as standards with the tissues. The injection syringes were weighed pre- and post-injection to determine the weight of injectate and the activity according to the dose calibrator was measured before and after injection. All of the tissues were weighed and counted with the standards. The standards were used to obtain the counts/g injectate, the weights of the injectate were used to determine the total number of counts for the injected dose (ID), the counts of the tissue were used to get the % ID, and the weights of the tissues were used to obtain the % ID/g. Standard averaging and standard deviation calculations were applied.
(137) .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab was evaluated in healthy nude female mice (11-13 weeks old, CRL) and in SKOV3 tumor-bearing nude female mice (shoulder xenografted with 510.sup.6 cells in 1:1 matrigel:media approximately 3 weeks prior to being used in the study). In certain embodiments, the healthy mice (n=4) were injected with 50 Ci/mouse and sacrificed at 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, and 21 d after radioactive injection. Four of the tumor-bearing mice were injected with 500 Ci/mouse, imaged using the nanoSPECT/CT (Mediso, Budapest, Hungary) at 1, 3, and 7 d p.i, and dissected at 7 d p.i. To obtain the SPECT/CT images, the imaging mice were anesthetized using 4-3% isofluorane with 2 L/min oxygen flow, approximately a 7.5 min CT scan was obtained followed by a 1 h SPECT image acquisition using the same imaging window as the CT scan. The other eight mice (n=4) were injected with 50 Ci/mouse and dissected at 1 and 3 d p.i. Similar data collection and analysis was applied to this group as was described for the healthy mice injected with chelator complexes.
(138) Biodistribution Studies
(139) Following i.v. tail vein injection of 15-20 Ci of the .sup.89Zr-radiolabeled compounds, the animals (n=5 per group) can be sacrificed at selected time points after injection and desired tissues can be removed, weighed, and counted for radioactivity accumulation. Tissues including blood, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, muscle, heart, bone, and tumor can be counted. The percentage injected dose per gram (% ID/g) and percentage injected dose per organ (% ID/organ) can be calculated by comparison to a weighed, counted standard solution. Time points can be 1, 12, 24, 96, and 168 h.
(140) Pharmacokinetic Measurements
(141) The acute biodistribution and PET data described above can provide the temporal concentration of the agents and allow for characterization of pharmacokinetic parameters of the agents in tissues. From this data, the standard pharmacokinetic measures of clearance, absorption, and volume of distribution of each organ can be calculated.
(142) Data Analysis and Statistics
(143) Radiolabeling of ligand-antibody complexes can be evaluated with radio-ITLC and purified by SEC and/or centrifugal filtration. Statistically significant differences between mean values can be determined using analysis of variances (ANOVA) coupled to Scheffe's test or, for statistical classification, a Student's t test can be performed using PRISM (San Diego, Calif.). Differences at the 95% confidence level (p<0.05) can be considered significant. In certain embodiments, at least one bifunctional chelator based on each of the conjugation chemistries can be evaluated in vivo. As described herein, the eight oxygen donor atoms fully coordinate to .sup.89Zr. Moreover, the linear ligand exhibit fast .sup.89Zr labeling kinetics at room temperature and physiological pH. Thus, the properties of HOPO stabilize .sup.89Zr. To further these .sup.89Zr binding properties, a bifunctional ligand with improved .sup.89Zr binding properties and improved linker technology was created to eliminate the release of .sup.89Zr and uptake of the radioisotope in bone and non-target organs during PET imaging. Reagents
(144) All chemicals, unless otherwise noted, were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.) and used as received without further purification. All instruments were calibrated and maintained in accordance with standard quality-control procedures. High-resolution mass spectrometry was carried out through electrospray ionization using an Agilent 6520 QTOF instrument. .sup.1H and .sup.13C NMR spectra were recorded at varying temperatures on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance inverse cryoprobe, with .sup.1H and .sup.13C resonance frequencies of 600.13 MHz and 150 mHz or a Bruker DRX spectrometer equipped with a .sup.1H, .sup.13C cryoprobe, with respective resonance frequencies of 500.13 MHz and 125.76 MHz with Topsin software. The NMR spectra are expressed on the 6 scale and were referenced to residual solvent peaks and/or internal tetramethylsilane. The HPLC system used for analysis and purification compounds consisted of a Rainin HPXL system with a Varian ProStar 325 UV-Vis Detector monitored at 254 nm. Analytical chromatography was carried out using a Waters Symmetry C18 Column, 100 , 5 m, 4.6 mm100 mm at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and purification was done with a preparatory Waters Symmetry C18 Prep Column, 100 , 5 m, 19 mm100 mm at a flow rate of 17.059 mL/min. IR spectroscopy was performed on a solid sample using an attenuated total reflectance attachment on a PerkinElmer Spectrum 2 FT-IR spectrometer with a UATR Two attachment.
(145) .sup.89Zr was produced at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center on a TR19/9 cyclotron (Ebco Industries Inc.) via the .sup.89Y(p,n).sup.89Zr reaction and purified to yield .sup.89Zr with a specific activity of 196-496 MBq/mg. Activity measurements were made using a CRC-15R Dose Calibrator (Capintec). For the quantification of activities, experimental samples were counted on an Automatic Wizard (2) g-Counter (Perkin Elmer). The radiolabeling of ligands was monitored using salicylic acid impregnated instant thin-layer chromatography paper (ITLC-SA) (Agilent Technologies) and analyzed on a Bioscan AR-2000 radio-TLC plate reader using Winscan Radio-TLC software (Bioscan Inc., Washington, D.C.). All in vivo experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 08-07-013). Purity of greater than 95% was confirmed using quantitative HPLC analysis for non-radioactive compounds (HOPO and Zr-HOPO) and radio-TLC for radioactive compounds (.sup.89Zr-HOPO).
Synthesis of (N1, N4, N9-Tri-tert-butoxycarbonyl)-1,12-di-amino-4,9-diazadodecane (4 in FIG. 4)
(146) The tri-BOC-protected spermine was prepared according to Geall et al. Synthesis of Cholesteryl Polyamine Carbamate: pKa Studies and Condensation of Calf Thymus DNA. Bioconjugate Chem. 2000; 11:314-326. To a flask containing spermine (1 from
(147) .sup.1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 3.07-3.21 (m, 10H), 2.68 (t, 2H), 2.08 (bs, 2H), 1.59-1.70 (m, 4H), 1.41-1.46 (m, 31H). .sup.13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 156.04, 155.55, 79.48, 78.88, 46.80, 43.79, 38.76, 37.35, 32.46, 30.9, 28.42. HRMS calculated for C.sub.25H.sub.50N.sub.4O.sub.6 ([M+H].sup.+), 503.38, found 503.3817.
Synthesis of tert-butyl(4-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)(3-((4-nitrophenethyl)amino)propy)amino)butyl)(3-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)propyl)carbamate (5 from FIG. 4)
(148) A solution of 4-nitrophenylethyl bromide (0.126 g, 0.55 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was added to a suspension of 4 (from
Synthesis of N1-(3-aminopropyl)-N4-(3-((4-nitrophenethyl)amino)propyl)butane-1,4-diamine (6 from FIG. 4)
(149) A solution of 4M HCl in dioxane (5 mL) was added to a stirring solution of 5 (from
Synthesis of 1-(benzyloxy)-N-(3-(1-(benzyloxy)-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamido)propyl)-N-(4-(1-(benzyloxy)-N-(3-(1-(benzyloxy)-N-(4-nitrophenethyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)propyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)butyl)-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (7 from FIG. 4)
(150) A solution of 1-(benzyloxy)-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carbonyl chloride (0.789 g, 3 mmol) in methylene chloride (15 mL) was added drop wise to a stirred solution of triethylamine (0.835 mL, 6 mmol), 6 (from
(151) (16H), 3.82-2.06 (m, 25H), 1.84-0.63 (m, 8H); .sup.13C NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): (mixture of rotamers) 1420.16, 142.14, 139.12, 139.05, 139.0, 138.97, 138.87, 138.82, 138.78, 138.70, 138.66, 138.59, 138.55, 138.50, 133.16, 133.13, 133.06, 130.86, 130.80, 130.72, 130.66, 130.45, 135.41, 135.37, 130.34, 130.32, 130.29, 130.26, 130.23, 129.79, 129.76, 129.73, 129.70, 129.65, 129.62, 129.56, 123.97, 123.92, 123.83, 123.76, 123.74, 123.36, 122.79, 122.65, 122.57, 122.53, 122.52, 122.48, 104.07, 103.62, 103.54, 103.49, 103.40, 103.34, 79.66, 46.97, 46.08, 46.02, 41.99, 40.64, 36.95, 36.93, 36.89, 36.81, 34.61, 33.39, 33.23, 33.11, 26.09, 26.88, 25.52, 25.49, 25.32, 25.18, 25.11, 24.84, 24.80, 24.53, 24.17, 24.13, 23.98; HRMS calculated for C.sub.70H.sub.69N.sub.9O.sub.14 ([M+H].sup.+), 1260.5042, found 1260.5038.
Synthesis of N-(4-(N-(3-(N-(4-aminophenethyl)-1-(benzyloxy)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)propyl)-1-(benzyloxy)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)butyl)-1-(benzyloxy)-N-(3-(1-(benzyloxy)-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamido)propyl)-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (8 from FIG. 4)
(152) To a suspension of Raney nickel in (1:1) MeOH: THF (10 mL), 7 (from
(153) .sup.1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): (mixture of rotamers) 8.70-8.64 (m, 1H), 7.44-7.33 (m, 27H), 6.93-6.89 (m, 1H), 6.89-6.80 (m, 3H), 6.64-6.62 (m, 4H), 6.31-6.10 (m, 4H), 5.38-5.26 (m, 5H), 5.04-4.99 (m, 3H), 3.60-3.55 (m, 18H), 3.16-3.13 (m, 14H), 1.76-1.21 (m, 10H); 158.18, 158.14, 155.63, 155.30, 155.27, 155.09, 155.06, 155.03, 141.89, 141.63, 141.60, 140.70, 140.59, 140.51, 136.82, 136.77, 136.64, 131.65, 161.41, 131.38, 131.35, 127.49, 127.44, 127.38, 127.29, 126.97, 126.87, 126.27, 126.23, 126.20, 120.31, 120.35, 119.75, 117.81, 115.46, 113.1, 101.62, 100.26, 100.1, 76.16, 76.10, 59.81, 52.71, 45.56, 45.49, 43.71, 43.47, 43.31, 41.3, 39.83, 39.65, 34.51, 34.45, 34.18, 34.11, 31.09, 29.71, 25.62, 24.36, 23.29, 22.73, 22.54, 22.43, 21.75, 21.38, 21.29; HRMS calculated for C.sub.70H.sub.72N.sub.9O.sub.12 ([M+H].sup.+), 1230.5300, found 1230.5299.
Synthesis of 4-(11,15-bis(1-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonyl)-1-(1-hydroxy-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridin-2-yl)-6-(1-hydroxy-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carbonyl)-1-oxo-2,6,11,15-tetraazaheptadecan-17-yl)benzenaminium Chloride (9 from FIG. 4)
(154) Crude 8 (from
(155) The purified sample was confirmed by HPLC on an analytical C18 column (Waters Symmetry C18 Prep Column, 100 , 5 m, 4.6 mm100 mm) at 1 mL/min using a gradient of 10-30% MeCN in water (both containing 0.1% TFA) with an initial hold at 10% MeCN for 1.33 mins and then a ramp to 30% MeCN over 30 minutes followed by a ramp to 95% MeCN over 1 minute and an isocratic hold at 95% MeCN for 5.66 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: J1, J2=6 Hz, 1H), 7.08-7.01 (m, 2H), 6.54-6.53 (m, 4H), 6.33-6.32 (m, 3H), 6.18-6.21 (m, 0.5H), 5.74-5.67 (m, 0.5H), 3.65-3.51 (m, 4H), 3.51-3.16 (m, 8H), 3.12-2.70 (m, 11H), 1.91-1.38 (m, 10H); .sup.13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl.sub.3): (mixture of rotamers) 158.8, 158.6, 158.4, 158.1, 157.9, 157.8, 157.77, 157.73, 142.5, 142.49, 142.45, 142.41, 142.32, 142.24, 142.04, 138.10, 138.0, 137.59, 137.51, 130.36, 130.31, 130.18, 130.08, 119.76, 119.45, 117.5, 115.6, 104.3, 102.5, 102.47, 102.41, 50.01, 48.12, 47.9, 46.0, 46.0, 43.7, 42.3, 37.2, 37.0, 36.97, 33.80, 32.65, 32.49, 28.16, 26.90, 26.23, 25.4, 25.4, 25.2, 25.1, 24.4, 24.3, 24.3, 24.2; HRMS calculated for C.sub.42H.sub.47N.sub.9O.sub.12 ([M+H]+), 870.3422, found 870.3420.
Synthesis of 1-hydroxy-N-(3-(1-hydroxy-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamido)propyl)-N-(4-(1-hydroxy-N-(3-(1-hydroxy-N-(4-isothiocyanatophenethyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)propyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)butyl)-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (p-SCN-Bn-HOPO from FIG. 4)
(156) NEt.sub.3 (0.0012 g, 0.012 mmol) was added to a solution of 9 from
(157) The purified sample was confirmed by HPLC on an analytical C18 column (Waters Symmetry C18 Prep Column, 100 , 5 m, 4.6 mm100 mm) at 1 mL/min using a gradient of 5-75% MeCN in water (both containing 0.1% TFA) with an initial hold at 5% MeCN for 1.33 mins and then a ramp to 75% MeCN over 30 minutes followed by a ramp to 95% MeCN over 1 minute and an isocratic hold at 95% MeCN for 5.66 minutes.
(158) .sup.1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl.sub.3): (mixture of rotamers) 7.37-7.31 (m, 7H), 7.12-7.08 (m, 1H), 6.58-6.52 (m, 4H), 6.34-5.81 (m, 4H), 3.62-3.54 (m, 12H), 3.13-2.83 (m, 11H), 2.01-1.24 (m, 11H); 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): (mixture of rotamers) 161.78, 161.71, 161.54, 161.4, 160.65, 160.61, 157.89, 157.83, 157.78, 157.73, 142.59, 142.48, 142.41, 142.33, 142.31, 142.21, 139.58, 138.49, 138.90, 138.81, 138.17, 138.0, 137.57, 137.50, 134.07, 130.76, 130.74, 130.59, 130.52, 128.89, 128.66, 126.41, 126.32, 119.74, 119.53, 119.43, 104.33, 102.50, 102.39, 49.62, 48.11, 47.96, 46.49, 46.01, 45.70, 37.24, 37.01, 36.96, 34.04, 32.83, 32.71, 28.15, 27.12, 26.85, 26.22, 25.46, 25.26, 25.17, 24.36, 24.18; HRMS calculated for C.sub.43H.sub.45N.sub.9O.sub.12S ([M+H].sup.+), 912.2987, found 912.2987.
Preparation of .SUP.177.Lu-HOPO and .SUP.177.Lu-DOTA
(159) A 0.05 M HCl solution of .sup.177Lu was obtained from PerkinElmer (Waltham, Mass.) with greater than 20 Ci/mg. Approximately 2200 Ci (81.4 MBq) of .sup.177Lu was diluted in 33 L of 0.2 M NH.sub.4OAc (pH 5.5). To this, 25 L of DMSO was added and split into two reaction vials (25 L each). HOPO ligand dissolved in DMSO (2.00 mM, 11.4 L, 22.8 nmol) was added to one reaction vial and DOTA ligand dissolved in DMSO (2.86 mM, 8.02 L, 22.9 nmol) was added to the other reaction vial. The reactions were reacted without stirring at RT for 10 min, then diluted with 0.9 mL of PBS. The reaction mixture was HPLC or radioTLC analyzed for purity. The specific activity was approximately 53.0 Ci/nmol (1.96 GBq/mol). Prior to murine tail vein injection, the solution was filtered through a 0.2 m sterile filter (13 mm diameter, Whatman, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK).
(160) Ligand-Antibody Conjugation
(161) Trastuzumab (purchased commercially as Herceptin, Genentech, San Francisco, Calif.) was purified using pre-packed size exclusion chromatography (SEC) columns (Sephadex G-25 M, PD-10 Desalting Columns, 50 kDa, GE Healthcare) and centrifugal filter units with a 50,000 molecular weight cutoff (Amicon Ultra 4 Centrifugal Filtration Units, Millipore Corp., Billerica, Mass.) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to remove _-trehalose dihydrate, L-histidine, and polysorbate 20 additives. After purification, the antibody was taken up in PBS at pH 7.4. Subsequently, 60 L of antibody solution (13 nmol) were diluted to 1 mL with PBS at pH 7.4. The pH antibody solution was raised to 8.8-9.0 with 0.1 M Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 before the slow addition of 5 equivalents of p-SCN-Bn-HOPO or p-SCN-Bn-HOPO in 12 L of DMSO. The reaction was incubated at 37 C. for 1 h and shaken at 300 rpm, followed by SEC and centrifugal filtration to purify the ligand-antibody conjugate. The final bioconjugates were stored in PBS pH 7.4 at 4 C. Chelate number was investigated via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis conducted at the University of Alberta. Samples of DFO-trastuzumab, HOPO-trastuzumab, and unmodified trastuzumab were submitted for analysis and the chelate number was calculated as the difference between the modified and unmodified antibody divided by the mass of the chelator. Samples were analyzed in triplicate and values were calculated from averages. When the triplicate MALD-TOF results were examined, the error was determined to be too large to provide meaningful results. Identical samples gave values that differed by the masses of entire chelates. Chelate number was then determined using an isotopic dilution assay.
(162) The preparation of .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab was similar to that of .sup.177Lu-HOPO, 300 Ci of the .sup.177Lu was diluted in 200 L of 0.2 M NH.sub.4OAc (pH 5.5) which contained 6 mg/mL ascorbic acid. The HOPO-trastuzumab (7.24 mg/mL, 6.91 L) was added to the solution and reacted for 10 min at room temperature without stirring. An aliquot of 50 mM DTPA (50 L) was added to quench the reaction and chelate any residual or loosely bound .sup.177Lu. The product mixture was purified by gravity gel size exclusion chromatography (PD 10 column, GE Healthcare) and eluted in PBS with 6 mg/mL ascorbic acid. The eluant was analyzed by radioTLC with ITLC plates and developing in 50 mM DTPA solution. The resulting solution was approximately 4-5 mCi/mg (0.15-0.19 GBq/mg).
(163) Radiolabeling Experiments
(164) .sup.89Zr was received after target processing as .sup.89Zr-oxalate in 1.0 M oxalic acid. This solution is then neutralized with 1.0 M sodium carbonate to reach pH 6.8-7.2. Both the DFO and HOPO ligands were labeled at various concentrations in water or saline with the neutralized .sup.89Zr solution at room temperature for varying lengths of time, typically 10-60 min. Reactions were monitored via radio-TLC with different stationary phases depending on the nature of the reaction. .sup.89Zr-ligand complexes required Varian ITLC-SA strips (Agilent Technologies) whereas .sup.89Zr-ligand-trastuzumab complexes employed Varian ITLC-SG strips (Agilent Technologies), but both analysis methods used 50 mM EDTA at pH 5 as the mobile phase. .sup.89Zr complexes remained at the origin, while free .sup.89Zr was taken up by EDTA in the mobile phase and migrated along the ITLC strip.
(165) Serum Stability Studies
(166) .sup.89Zr-ligand and .sup.89Zr-ligand-antibody complexes were prepared according to the radiolabeling protocol as described above. For each .sup.89Zr complex, samples were made consisting of 900 L human serum and 100 L of the .sup.89Zr species and were placed in a heat block at 37 C. with agitation. Samples were monitored using radio-TLC before being added to the serum and then after 1 week of incubation. The stability of the complexes was measured as the percentage of .sup.89Zr that was retained at the origin of the ITLC strip and therefore still intact.
(167) The following procedure was used for the serum stability studies for the .sup.177Lu based systems. In triplicate, 50 L of the diluted .sup.177Lu-HOPO or .sup.177Lu-DOTA species was added to 450 L of human serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) and incubated at 37 C. on a thermomixer (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, N.Y.). At various time points (0, 1, 3, and 6 d), an aliquot of each was spotted on two ITLC plates, one developed in 50 mM DTPA and one in EtOH (for Lu-DOTA) or 50:50 EtOH in water (for Lu-HOPO). After 6 days, the .sup.177Lu-DOTA incubated with serum was also diluted with 500 L of EtOH, vortexed, centrifuged (twice at 12,000 rpm for 5 min each time) at room temperature. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 m nylon filter (13 mm, Whatman), centrifuged the filtrate for 5 min at 12,000 rpm at room temperature, and injected the supernatant onto the HPLC.
(168) Similarly, 100 L of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab solution was incubated with 900 L of human serum (in quadruplicate). At various time points (1, 3, and 6 d), a 100 L aliquot of the incubation material was added to 10 L of 50 mM DTPA, vortexed, and spotted onto an ITLC strip. Additionally, a 100 L aliquot of the starting solution (just PBS with 6 mg/mL ascorbic acid) was added to 10 L of DTPA, vortexed, spotted onto an ITLC strip. The ITLC strips were developed in 50 mM DTPA and analyzed by radioTLC.
(169) Immunoreactivity Assay
(170) The immunoreactivity of the .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab and .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab bioconjugates was determined using specific radioactive cellular-binding assays. To this end, BT474 cells were suspended in microcentrifuge tubes at concentrations of 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.25, 1.0, 0.75, and 0.25106 cells/mL in 500 L PBS (pH 7.4). Aliquots of either .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab or .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab (50 L of a stock solution of 10 Ci in 10 mL of 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS pH 7.4) were added to each tube (n=3; final volume: 550 L), and the samples were incubated on a mixer for 60 min at room temperature. The treated cells were then pelleted via centrifugation (600 G for 2 min), aspirated, and washed twice with cold PBS before removing the supernatant and counting the activity associated with the cell pellet. The activity data were background-corrected and compared with the total number of counts in appropriate control samples. Immunoreactive fractions were determined by linear regression analysis of a plot of (total/bound) activity against (1/[normalized cell concentration]). No weighting was applied to the data, and data were obtained as n=3.
(171) The immunoreactivity of the .sup.177Lu based systems was tested using the following procedure. SKOV3 cells (1010.sup.6 cells/0.2 mL cell media) were added to microcentrifuge tubes (four replicates had 0.2 mL/tube and four had 0.1 mL/tube). To each of the 0.2 mL cell suspensions, 20 L of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab (20 nCi, 740 Bq, 3.7 ng, in PBS pH 7.4 with 6 mg/mL ascorbic acid) was added and gently vortexed. To each of the 0.1 mL cell suspensions, L of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab (10 nCi, 370 Bq, 1.9 ng, in PBS pH 7.4 with 6 mg/mL ascorbic acid) was added and gently vortexed. Four samples (0.22 mL suspension) were incubated at 4 C. for 60 min (without shaking in an ice bath) and four samples (0.11 mL suspensions) were incubated at 37 C. for 60 min (with shaking at 300 rpm in a thermomixer). After incubation, the samples were centrifuged (600 g, 4 C., 2 min), supernatant removed, and washed three times with ice-cold PBS (1 mL). In each of the washes, the cell pellet was broken-up with gentle vortexing, the samples were centrifuged (600 g, 4 C., 2 min), and the supernatant removed. The supernatants at each step were collected separately and the cell-bound material was measured for the final pellets in the original incubation microcentrifuge tubes. All of the supernatants and cells were counted for 3 min using an automatic gamma counter (2480 Wizard.sup.2 3, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Mass.). The activity data was automatically background-corrected by the instrument, and the amount of activity (antibody) bound to the cells was compared to activity of five 20 L aliquots of the .sup.177Lu-HOPO-trastuzumab solution to obtain the percent activity bound to the cells.
(172) PET Imaging
(173) Imaging can be performed in a temperature-controlled imaging suite with close monitoring of the physiological status of the mice. Small animal PET imaging can be performed on an Inveon PET/CT system. Following intravenous (i.v.) tail vein injection of 200-300 Ci of the .sup.89Zr-radiolabeled compounds in the desired formulations, mice can be anesthetized with 1-2% isoflurane, placed in a supine position, and immobilized in a custom prepared cradle. Groups of 5 mice r a single injection of the .sup.89Zr-radiolabeled agent. Animals can be imaged with data collection at selected time points. Standard uptake values (SUVs) can be generated from regions of interest (ROIs) drawn over the organs of interest.
(174) PET imaging experiments were conducted on a microPET Focus 120. Female, athymic nude mice with BT474 xenografts on their right shoulders were administered .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab (9.25-9.99 MBq [250-270 Ci] in 200 L 0.9% sterile saline) or .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (9.25-9.99 MBq [250-270 Ci] in 200 L 0.9% sterile saline) via intravenous tail vein injection (t=0). Approximately 5 min prior to the acquisition of PET images, mice were anesthetized by inhalation of 2% isoflurane (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Ill.)/oxygen gas mixture and placed on the scanner bed; anesthesia was maintained using 1% isoflurane/gas mixture. PET data for each mouse were recorded via static scans at various time points (n=4) between 6 h and 9 d. An energy window of 350-700 keV and a coincidence timing window of 6 ns were used. Data were sorted into 2D histograms by Fourier rebinning, and transverse images were reconstructed by filtered back-projection (FBP) into a 12812863 (0.720.721.3 mm3) matrix. The image data were normalized to correct for non-uniformity of response of the PET, dead-time count losses, positron branching ratio, and physical decay to the time of injection, but no attenuation, scatter, or partial-volume averaging correction was applied. The counting rates in the reconstructed images were converted to activity concentrations (percentage injected dose per gram of tissue, % ID/g) by use of a system calibration factor derived from the imaging of a mouse-sized water-equivalent phantom containing 89Zr. Images were analyzed using ASIPro VM software (Concorde Microsystems).
(175) Biodistribution
(176) Acute in vivo biodistribution studies were performed in order to compare the uptake of .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab and .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab in BT474 tumor-bearing female, athymic nude mice. Mice were warmed gently with a heat lamp for 5 min before administration of .sup.89Zr-HOPO-trastuzumab (0.59-0.67 MBq [16-18 Ci] in 200 L 0.9% sterile saline) or .sup.89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab (0.67-0.74 MBq [18-20 Ci] in 200 L 0.9% sterile saline) via intravenous tail vein injection (t=0). Animals (n=4 per group) were euthanized by CO.sub.2(g) asphyxiation at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 14 d. After asphyxiation, 14 organs were removed, rinsed in water, dried in air for 5 min, weighed, and assayed for radioactivity on a gamma counter calibrated for .sup.89Zr. Counts were converted into activity using a calibration curve generated from known standards. Count data were background- and decay-corrected to the time of injection, and the percent injected dose per gram (% ID/g) for each tissue sample was calculated by normalization to the total activity injected.
(177) Hydroxyapatite Stability of .sup.177Lu-HOPO and .sup.177Lu-DOTA
(178) Hydroxyapatite gel (1-5 mg, BIO-RAD, Hercules, Calif.) was incubated with 500 L of 0.05 M tris buffer (pH 7.6) and 1 L of .sup.177Lu, .sup.177Lu-HOPO, or .sup.177Lu-DOTA solution (approximately 1 Ci each) in quadruplicate for each time point (1, 3, and 6 d) at 37 C. in a thermomixer. Additionally, each day the mixtures were vortexed to ensure proper mixing. At the respective time point, the aliquot was vortexed, centrifuged, vortexed, filtered (0.45 m, 13 mm, nylon syringe filter, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass.), and the filter washed with 1 mL of 50:50 EtOH in water. The filter (bound to hydroxyapatite), reaction tube, and filtrate (bound to the chelator) were counted separately on a gamma counter to determine the amount of activity in each.
(179) EDTA Challenge of .sup.177Lu-HOPO and .sup.177Lu-DOTA
(180) 50 L of .sup.177Lu-HOPO solution (0.94 Ci/L; 0.0088 mM), 50 L of EDTA solution (pH adjusted to 8, 7, 6, or 5 and 0.9 mM), and 50 L of NH.sub.4OAc (pH adjusted to 8, 7, 6, or 5 and 0.5 mM) were added together. The solutions (triplicates of each pH) were incubated at 37 C. over 6 d in a thermomixer and radioTLC analyzed using C-18 TLC plates (Millipore, Billerica, Mass.) developed with 50 mM DTPA at 1 h, 1 d, 3 d, and 6 d.
(181) Metal Ion Challenge of .sup.177Lu-HOPO and .sup.177Lu-DOTA
(182) .sup.177Lu-HOPO or .sup.177Lu-DOTA solution, PBS and a metal cation solution (Cu.sup.2+, Fe.sup.3+, Ga.sup.3+, or Gd.sup.3+ at 10 times the metal:ligand ratio) in equal volumes were incubated. Additionally, .sup.177Lu-HOPO or .sup.177Lu-DOTA solution at twice as much DME HG media without fetal calf serum and with penicillin and streptomycin were incubated (ratio of Metal:Ligand for Ca.sup.2+, Fe.sup.3+, Mg.sup.2+, K.sup.+, and Na.sup.+ were 115.6, 0.015, 52.0, 340, and 9980, respectively). The incubations were performed at 37 C. in a thermomixer over the course of 6 d and analyzed by radioTLC using C-18 TLC plates developed with 50 mM DTPA at 1, 3, and 6 d.