Abstract
The electronic access control strike can have a bolt socket, a bolt path leading to bolt socket, a keeper movably mounted to a frame in a manner to be moveable into and out of interference with the bolt path, a cam member moveable for selectively blocking or unblocking the movement of the keeper, and an anti-preload member which is moveable into interference between the keeper and the cam member for preventing the keeper from conveying a preload force onto the cam member when the cam member is in the blocking position, and moveable out from interference between the keeper and the cam member when the cam member is in the unblocking position to allow the keeper to be moved out from interference with the bolt path.
Claims
1. An electronic access control strike having a bolt socket, a bolt path leading to bolt socket, a keeper pivotably mounted to a frame in a manner to be pivotable around a keeper pivot axis, into and out of interference with the bolt path, a blocker moveable in an orientation parallel to the keeper pivot axis for selectively blocking or unblocking the movement of the keeper, a motor, an anti-preload member which is pivotable around a motor axis about which the motor rotates and parallel to the keeper pivot axis, independently of the blocker, into interference between the keeper and the blocker for preventing the keeper from conveying a preload force onto the blocker when the blocker is in the blocking position, and pivotable, independently of the blocker, out from interference between the keeper and the blocker when the blocker is in the unblocking position to allow the keeper to be moved out from interference with the bolt path; and the motor controlling the movement of the anti-preload member.
2. The electronic access control strike of claim 1 wherein the keeper has an engagement feature spaced apart from the keeper pivot axis and configured to be engaged upon by the anti-preload member for receiving the force therefrom.
3. The electronic access control strike of claim 1 wherein the anti-preload member is pivotable by the motor into engagement with the keeper to exert a force against the keeper and move the keeper away from the blocker.
4. The electronic access control strike of claim 1 wherein the anti-preload member is biased to the interference position, and wherein the electronic access control strike further comprises a blocking member moveable to selectively block the anti-preload member in the interference position or release the anti-preload member from the interference position, the motor driving the movement of the blocking member.
5. The electronic access control strike of claim 4 wherein the movement of the blocking member is longitudinal and is driven by rotation of a key member by the motor, the key member being engaged in a helical keypath in the blocking member, the helical keypath being concentric with the motor axis.
6. The electronic access control strike of claim 1 further comprising an actuator controlling the movement of the blocker.
7. The electronic access control strike of claim 6 wherein the keeper member is biased into the bolt path, wherein the blocker is slidable, the actuator includes a solenoid for pulling the blocker into a first sliding direction, and a biasing member biasing the blocker in a second, opposite sliding direction when the solenoid is inactive.
8. The electronic access control strike of claim 6 further comprising an input module for receiving a user input, an authenticator to authenticate the user input, and a controller for operating the actuator contingent upon authentication of the user input.
9. The electronic access control strike of claim 1 further comprising an actuator controlling the movement of the blocker, and a controller coordinating the action of the motor and of the actuator in a manner that the actuator is activated when said anti-preload member is in the interference position.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1) In the figures,
(2) FIGS. 1A to 1C are sequential oblique views showing components of the electronic access control strike A) during preload, B) countering pre-load, and C) unblocking, in accordance with a first embodiment;
(3) FIGS. 2A and 2B are sequential oblique views showing components of the electronic access control strike A) countering pre-load and B) releasing the bolt, in accordance with a second embodiment;
(4) FIGS. 3A to 3C are sequential side views showing components of the electronic access control strike of FIGS. 2A and 2B A) countering pre-load B) releasing the keeper and C) releasing the bolt;
(5) FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example of an electronic access control strike;
(6) FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the operation of an example of an electronic access control strike;
(7) FIGS. 6A and 6B are an example of a preload-negating module being retrofitted to an electronic access control strike;
(8) FIG. 7 is an example of an electronic access control strike, in accordance with a third embodiment;
(9) FIGS. 8 and 9 are additional views of a preload-negating module retrofitted to an electronic access control strike, and FIG. 8A shows the engagement of the pivotable member against the keeper; and
(10) FIG. 10 is an exploded view of an example electronic access control strike.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(11) FIGS. 1A through 1C show an example of operation of an electronic access control strike 10 featuring an anti-preload action. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 1A, a keeper 12 is movably mounted in a frame which is not shown. In this embodiment, the keeper 12 is movable by pivoting, but it will be understood that in alternate embodiments, the keeper 12 can be movable by sliding. The purpose of the movement of the keeper is to yield to the bolt 14 (latchbolt) to allow the bolt 14 to exit the bolt socket and pivot, with the pivoting movement of the door, along the bolt path 16, when an authenticated user exerts a pivoting force on the door. However, the keeper movement ability must remain blocked in the absence of authentication, and only become unblocked if the user is authenticated. In other words, the keeper movement ability is contingent upon the authentication of the user. To this end, a moveable cam 18 can be provided to selectively be moved into a blocking and an unblocking position. In this specific example, the cam 18 is provided in the form of a two-pronged cam member 20, whereas the keeper 16 is provided with two corresponding prongs 22. When the cam member 18 is in the blocking position such as shown in FIG. 1A, the movement of the keeper 12 is blocked. More specifically, the pivoting movement of the keeper 12 to yield to the force exerted by the bolt is prevented because the keeper prongs 22 engage the cam prongs 20 and the cam prongs 20 exert an opposite resistance force.
(12) The cam member 18 is slidably mounted in the frame to be slidable selectively into a blocking position such as shown in FIG. 1A and into an unblocking position such as shown in FIG. 1C. This sliding movement can be parallel to the pivot axis 24 of the keeper, and performed by a cam actuator 26, such as a solenoid, for instance. In the unblocking position, the cam prongs 20 are out from interference with the keeper prongs 22, and the keeper 12 is free to pivot in the direction indicated by the arrow 30 and yield to the movement of the bolt 14.
(13) In some cases, the bolt 14 can apply a force against the keeper 12 such as shown in FIG. 1A independently of the action of the user. This can be caused by many sources such as presented above. When this occurs, the keeper prongs 22 are forced into engagement with the cam prongs 20. This force can cause a sufficient friction to cause the jamming of the slidability of the cam member, thus preventing the cam member 18 from being slid into the unblocking position when the user has been authenticated and the cam actuator 26 is operated. This can be frustrating and/or problematic to the user.
(14) In this embodiment, this problem is addressed by a preload-negating feature. More specifically, a motor 36 is provided, connected to an anti-preload member 38. In this embodiment, the motor 36 is a rotary motor which moves the anti-preload member by rotating it. The motor is configured to pivot the anti-preload member 38 into engagement with the keeper 12, and to thereby exert a preload-negating motor force 32 (shown in FIG. 1B) which counters the preload force 30 and either satisfactorily compensates for, or annihilates, the force exerted by the keeper prongs 22 on the cam prongs 20, thereby restoring the sliding ability to the cam member 18 and allowing satisfactory actuation thereof by the cam actuator 26. In this embodiment, the motor axis 34 is parallel to the pivoting axis 24 of the keeper 12.
(15) Another embodiment of an electronic access control strike 110 featuring an anti-preload action is shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 2A, a keeper 112 is movably mounted in a frame which is not shown. In this embodiment, the keeper 112 is movable by pivoting, but it will be understood that in alternate embodiments, the keeper 112 can be movable by sliding. The purpose of the movement of the keeper is to yield to the bolt 114 (latchbolt) to allow the bolt 114 to exit the bolt socket and pivot, with the pivoting movement of the door, along the bolt path 116 (FIG. 3B), when an authenticated user exerts a pivoting force on the door. However, the keeper movement ability must remain blocked in the absence of authentication, and only become unblocked if the user is authenticated. In other words, the keeper movement ability is contingent upon the authentication of the user. To this end, a moveable cam 118 can be provided to selectively be moved into a blocking and an unblocking position. In this specific example, the cam 118 has two prongs 120, whereas the keeper 112 is provided with two corresponding prongs 122. When the cam member 118 is in the blocking position such as shown in FIG. 2A, the movement of the keeper 112 is blocked. More specifically, the pivoting movement of the keeper 112 to yield to the force exerted by the bolt 114 is prevented because the keeper prongs 122 engage the cam prongs 120 and the cam prongs 120 exert an opposite resistance force.
(16) The cam member 118 is slidably mounted in the frame to be slidable selectively into a blocking position such as shown in FIG. 2A and into an unblocking position such as shown in FIG. 2B. This sliding movement can be parallel to the pivot axis 124 of the keeper, and performed by a cam actuator, such as a solenoid, for instance (not shown). In the unblocking position, the cam prongs 120 are out from interference with the keeper prongs 122, and the keeper 112 is free to pivot in the direction indicated by the arrow 130 and yield to the movement of the bolt 114.
(17) In some cases, the bolt 114 can apply a force against the keeper 112 independently of the action of the user. This can be caused by many sources such as presented above. When this occurs, the keeper prongs 122 are forced into engagement with the cam prongs 120. This force can cause a sufficient friction to cause the jamming of the slidability of the cam member, thus preventing the cam member 118 from being slid into the unblocking position when the user has been authenticated and the cam actuator is operated. This can be frustrating and/or problematic to the user.
(18) In this embodiment, this problem is addressed by a preload-negating feature. More specifically, an anti-preload member 138 is provided. The anti-preload member 138 is pivotally mounted to the frame and can pivot around pivot axis 139 via arm 141. In this embodiment, the anti-preload member 138 is biased to a blocking position such as shown in FIG. 2A, where it is in interference with the movement of an engagement feature, e.g. cam 143 (also referred to as tooth), of the keeper 112. A blocking member 146 is connected to a motor 136 and is activatable to block the anti-preload member 138 into the blocking position shown in FIG. 2A, which prevents a preloading force from forcing the keeper prongs 122 against the cam prongs. When the user is authenticated, the first step is then to move the cam prongs 120 into their disengaged position shown in FIG. 2B, and then, the blocking of the anti-preload member 138 is released via the motor. More specifically, in this embodiment, the motor is a rotary motor which rotates a radially-oriented key member 150 inside a helical key path 152 provided with the blocking member 146, and therefore retracts the blocking member 146 from the anti-preload member 138. The keeper 112 is then free to rotate by a force exerted by the user via the bolt 114, and the cam 143 of the keeper 112 pushes the freed anti-preload member 138 against the bias. This latter pushing action can be facilitated by using a freely rotating member on the anti-preload member 138 or on the cam 143 to reduce friction, in this embodiment, the anti-preload member 138 was provided with a freely rotating member to this end. Once the door closes and the keeper 112 reverts to its initial position, the anti-preload member 138 also pivots back to its initial position due to the bias (e.g. spring), and the motor 136 can be activated to move the blocking member 146 back into its blocking position. In this embodiment, the motor axis 134 is parallel to the pivoting axis 124 of the keeper 112.
(19) FIG. 4 provides a higher-level and more complete schematic diagram of an electronic access control system 40 which is seen here to include an input module 42 for inputting the user data, an authenticator 44 to receive the user data 43 and authenticate it, such as by comparing it to credential data 46 for instance, and a controller system 48 which can coordinate the action of the motor 36 and the actuator 26 in a manner that the cam member 18 is operated while the preload negating force is being applied on the keeper 12 by the anti-preload member 38. Various alternate forms of detailed implementation can allow arriving to this general function. A relatively simple and practical way, as an example in relation with the first embodiment 10, is that the actuator controller 50 can operate the actuator 26 for a given period of time (e.g. 3-5 seconds), during which the motor 36 can be controlled to perform a complete rotation (which can last about 1 second for instance).
(20) The authenticator 44 will typically involve some form of computer, and can be provided as a computer unit, or be provided as part of a larger computing system, for instance. The authentication can be done in situ, or by communicating remotely such as via the Internet, for instance. As an example, a computer 52 can perform each of the functions of receiving the user data 43, authenticating the user data against the credential data 46, and controlling the motor 36 and the actuator 26. In alternate embodiments, it can be preferred to provide the motor controller 54 and the actuator controller 50 as separate units which are enabled for communication with one another, or to collectively receive a command from the authenticator 44, to name a few examples.
(21) FIG. 5 provides a general flowchart of the operation of the electronic access control strike system 10 or 110 having the preload negating feature. As shown schematically, the cam movement occurs while the pivotable member exerts the preload negating force against the keeper, and the opening of the door by the user follows the cam movement. The relatively minor distinctions between the first embodiment 10 and the second embodiment 110 are illustrated by using different types of intermittent lines. More specifically, in the first embodiment 10, illustrated with dotted lines, and preload negating force is only exerted upon receiving the authentication, whereas in the second embodiment, the preload negating force can be readied soon after the closing of the door.
(22) FIGS. 6A to 10 show an example of how a preload resistant module can be provided in a manner to be retrofittable to an existing electronic access control strike, although it will be understood that in an alternate embodiment, the preload-negating features, the motor and the pivotable member in particular, can be made integral to an electronic access control strike product, and housed in a common housing or frame.
(23) FIGS. 6A and 6B show the pre-existing electronic access control strike 60 and the preload resistant module 62 which can be provided as an add-on to problematic scenarios, for instance. In FIG. 6A, the two are shown disassembled, whereas in FIG. 6B, the two are shown assembled. FIGS. 7 and 9 show specifically the pre-existing electronic access control strike used in this example. As seen in FIG. 7, in this example, the keeper 212 of the pre-existing electronic access control strike does not have an engagement feature such as a tooth or cam, and it can be required to replace the pre-existing keeper 212 with a keeper such as keeper 12 or keeper 112 for instance, which has an engagement feature 43, 143, such as the one shown in FIG. 1A or 2A for instance.
(24) Referring now to FIGS. 8 and 8A, in this example, the anti-preload member 238 can be provided in the form of a disc member which is offset from the rotation axis of the motor in a manner to pivot around the rotation axis upon operation of the motor. Referring back to FIG. 6A, the preload-negating module can have a standalone frame 270 within which the motor 26, 126, with the anti-preload member, are mounted. This frame 270 can be provided with an aperture such as a slot 272 (seen in FIG. 6A) through which the anti-preload member 38, 138, 238 can protrude (and/or across which the engagement feature 43, 143 of the keeper can protrude) to allow satisfactory engagement of the anti-preload member and engagement feature of the keeper 12, 112.
(25) In this specific embodiment, such as shown more clearly in FIGS. 8 and 9, the motor 36, 136 has a base 274 which is secured within the frame 270 of the preload resistant module 62, and has a shaft 276 protruding outwardly from the anti-preload member. The shaft 276 is concentric with the axis of the motor whereas the anti-preload member, provided in the form of a disc rotatable with the motor in this third embodiment, is eccentric with the axis of the motor and the shaft. The frame 270 of the preload resistant module has a u-shaped neck 278 which is shaped to receive the shaft 276 and prevent the shaft 276 from moving laterally or toward the keeper. The frame 270 of the preload resistant module 62 is also provided with a cover 280 which snugly engages the motor and prevents the shaft 276 from disengaging from the u-shaped member 278 during operation. In this embodiment, the cover 280 is also provided with a slot 282 which clears the path of the pivoting member 238 (disc). This can allow a) to make the preload resistant module frame thinner and b) to visualise the movement of the disc during testing or installation, for instance.
(26) Referring now to FIG. 10, more details of the pre-existing electronic access control strike selected for this example is shown. It will be noted that in this example, the keeper is biased into interference with the bolt path by a keeper spring. Moreover, the cam actuator is provided in the form of a solenoid which can pull the cam member against the elastic force of a cam spring, the cam spring biasing the cam member into the blocking position.
(27) As can be understood, the examples described above and illustrated are intended to be exemplary only. For instance, in an alternate embodiment, the keeper can be slidable instead of pivotable, and selectively blocked or unblocked by any suitable mechanism. The scope is indicated by the appended claims.
