Cross-linked nanofiltration membranes

11554346 · 2023-01-17

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

The invention relates to the use of an uncoated cross-linked non-pyrolysed selective vinyl based halopolymer-membrane with a mwco of between 100 and 1000 Da, in the filtration of compounds from liquids comprising organic solvents and/or from liquids with a pH below 2 or above 12.

Claims

1. A method of removing a compound from a liquid comprising an organic solvent and/or from a liquid with a pH below 2 or above 12, the method comprising: applying the liquid on an uncoated cross-linked non-pyrolysed selective vinyl based halopolymer-membrane having a cross-linked matrix and a mwco of from 100 Da to 1000 Da; and optionally applying a pressure on the liquid to pass the liquid through the membrane.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid comprises organic solvents.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the liquid is a liquid without organic solvents.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid has a pH above 12.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid has a pH below 2.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the membrane is a cross-linked PVDF membrane.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the membrane is a solvent activated cross-linked PVDF membrane.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising drying the membrane before applying the liquid.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the membrane has an average pore size smaller than 0.1 μm.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the membrane has a thickness from 10 μm to 600 μm.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising cleaning the membranes at a pH below 2 or above 12.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid has a pH below 0 or above 14.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed at a temperature up to 150° C.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the solvent is a solvent that results in swelling or dissolution of the corresponding uncross-linked membrane.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the cross-linked polymer is obtained by dehydrohalogenation in alkaline media and cross linking.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the cross linking is performed with a diamine.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound is a heavy metal ion and wherein the liquid is an alkaline or acidic mining waste.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound is a cleaning agent in dairy industry.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Figure Legends

(1) FIG. 1. Schematic representation of a dehydrofluorination and diamine-based cross-linking reaction of PVDF The halopolymer is exemplified by PVDF and the cross-linker by para-xylenediamine.

(2) FIG. 2. ATR-FTIR spectra of the PVDF membranes as function of cross-linking time.

(3) FIG. 3. ATR-FTIR comparison of 120 h cross-linked PVDF and dehydrofluorinated PVDF.

(4) FIG. 4. Pure water permeance before (.square-solid.) and after (custom character) cross-linking for various cross-linking times.

(5) FIG. 5. Effect of cross-linking on the membrane retention for RB (1017 Da) and MO (327 Da).

(6) FIG. 6. SEM cross-section images as function of the membrane cross-linking time (indicated on the image).

(7) FIG. 7. XRD patterns of the cross-linked PVDF membranes as function of cross-linking time.

(8) FIG. 8. DSC profiles of the cross-linked PVDF membranes as function of cross-linking time. The 120 h cross-linked sample was not measured because of limited thermal stability in the higher end of the temperature window used for DSC measurements.

(9) FIG. 9. TGA of the PVDF membranes in weight % as function of cross-linking time.

(10) FIG. 10. H.sub.2O permeance (left panel) and RB retention (right panel) before (.square-solid.) and after (custom character) treatment in acidic and caustic conditions.

(11) FIG. 11. H.sub.2O permeance (top panel) and RB retention (bottom panel) before (.square-solid.) and after (custom character) treatment in acidic (5M HCl) and caustic (5M NaOH) conditions.

(12) FIG. 12. H.sub.2O permeance and RB retention in different organic solvents (with and without drying step.

ABBREVIATIONS

(13) PVDF, poly(vinylydene difluoride); NF, nanofiltration; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; XRD, X-ray diffraction spectroscopy; DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; TGA, thermal gravimetric analysis; DMA, dynamic mechanical analysis; RB, Rose Bengal; MO, methyl orange; MWCO, molecular weight cut-off; EDX, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; HCl, Hydrochloric acid; DMF, dimethylformamide; MeOH, methanol; XDA, p-xylenediamine; NaOH, sodium hydroxide.

(14) The invention relates to cross-linked halopolymer membraned used in nanofiltration processes, i.e. membranes with typically an average pore size between 1 and 10 nanometers. The membranes generally have the capacity to isolate compounds with a Mw of 200-1000 Da from a solvent.

(15) “Vinyl-based” in this context refers either to a polymer where at least 2 carbon-carbon double bonds, other than aromatic groups, are present in the polymer main chain or side chain. An example thereof is vinyl-substituted polynorbornene. Alternatively, it refers to a polymer where at least 2 carbon-carbon double bonds, other than aromatic groups, can be created in either the polymer main chain or side chain. Examples thereof include polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyvinylchloride (PVC) or poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene).

(16) The cross-linking process as described in the examples PVDF involves a defluorination step. Other fluor-containing polymers or polymers containing halogen groups in general are applicable in the methods and uses of the present invention.

(17) Examples of halopolymers are e.g. PVC, ethylene/tetrafluoroethylene copolymers, PTFE, PFA, poly(vinyl bromide).

(18) In a typical embodiment of the present invention the fluoropolymer is PVDF. Unmodified PVDF is a semi-crystalline polymer containing a crystalline phase and an amorphous phase. The crystalline phase provides good thermal stability whilst the amorphous phase adds some flexibility to the membrane. PVDF exhibits a number of desirable characteristics for membrane applications, including thermal resistance, reasonable chemical resistance (to a range of corrosive chemicals, including sodium hypochlorite), and weather (UV) resistance.

(19) The cross-linking of the membrane according to the methods disclosed herein provide a membrane with even more robust properties (pH stability and solvent resistance).

(20) Non-cross-linked halopolymer membranes can be obtained via any membrane formation processes such as phase inversion (flat sheet or hollow fiber), stretching or template leaching. The membrane characteristics (such as permeance, MWCO, structure) can be fine-tuned through adjusting the membrane formation parameters. In phase inversion, such parameters include but are not limited to polymer concentration, solvent type, addition/type/concentration of co-solvent, evaporation step, casting thickness, supporting fabric layer, the addition of additives.

(21) The cross-linking of halopolymers such as PVDF can be accomplished in multiple ways, as summarized by Taguet et al. (2005). In short, diamines, bisphenols, peroxides (but not for PVDF) and radiation (e.g. electron beams) are described for the cross-linking of various halopolymers. Other methods involve the grafting of a polystyrene network on a defluorised polymer.

(22) Other approaches for cross-linking a halopolymer-containing membrane can be found in the state of the art. CN102924732 describes the preparation of a cross-linked PVDF-HFP modified membrane using benzylperoxide and hot pressing cross-linking. WO2006073867 describes the preparation of a coating formulation combining a halopolymer latex dispersion with inorganic oxide nanoparticles in alkaline cross-linking conditions using a cross-linker comprised of either at least two amine functionalities or at least one amine group with at least one alkoxy silane. WO2010/082194 discloses commercial membranes made of various polymers, such as polysulphone (PS), polyether sulphone (PES), PAN, PVDF, which are cross-linked with polyethylene imine (PEI) using different chemistries. WO2006135966 describes the preparation of a porous polymeric membrane from a polymer blend which contains a hydrophobic non-cross-linkable component (e.g. PVDF) and a component which is cross-linkable (for instance, PVP) and treating this porous polymeric membrane under cross-linking conditions to produce a modified more hydrophilic membrane. CN102151498 describes the cross-linking of PVDF/PU blend membranes using a nano-sol based cross-linker comprised of an inorganic precursor, coupling agents, diluents and nanoparticles. WO1996003202 A1 described the use of UV-irradiation and thermal treatment to render various polymeric support membranes solvent stable. U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,623 described a diamine-based thermal cross-linking of PVDF to form polymer actuators.

(23) In a typical embodiment this is performed using PVDF by a defluorination in alkali, followed by a nucleophilic attack.

(24) Herein anything remaining in the pores of the membranes from the membrane formation process or potential storing conditions is removed and exchanged for the cross-linking solvent. This cross-linking solvent is a typically weak swelling agent for the halopolymer to provide sufficient matrix penetration for the cross-linking. The cross-linking solvent can be changed to control the cross-linking reaction. Next double bonds are created, in the halopolymer-based membranes through a dehydrofluorination reaction. This reaction is performed in alkaline conditions which can be created through the addition of various alkaline reagents (e.g. NaOH, KOH, or NaH) to the cross-linking solvent. The degree of dehydrofluorination can be adjusted by adjusting the parameters (time, temperature, type of base, addition of a catalyst) and can be between 0.00001 and 100%. The dehydrofluorination reaction may be enhanced by the addition of any acid acceptor (such as MgO or CaO). The second phase of the reaction converts part (0%<degree of conversion >100%) of the double bonds to cross-links through the addition of a nucleophilic cross-linker. The active functional group of this cross-linker can include amines, alcohols and thiols. This cross-linking reaction may be tuned by the addition of a catalyst, temperature, or reagent concentrations. The above described dehydrofluorination and cross-linking reaction can occur simultaneously in a one-pot reaction or in two consecutive steps. An example of the reaction scheme is shown for PVDF and XDA as cross-linker in FIG. 1.

(25) The resulting cross-linked membranes are further treated in a washing protocol to remove the unreacted substances present in the pores of the membranes and neutralize the pH which should stop the reaction. Chemicals used in the washing step can include HCl and MeOH.

(26) After cross-linking, the membranes can be directly used in a filtration setup, formed into membrane modules (e.g. spiral wound module) or stored for an unlimited time. The membranes can be stored dry or wet and may involve the use of chemicals (e.g. to preserve the pore structure or to prevent microbial growth).

(27) The final membranes can be used in aqueous, solvent, any pH condition or any combination thereof. The membranes can easily be cleaned because of their chemical stability, if necessary.

(28) The present invention provides selective and cross-linked halopolymer-based membranes. The halopolymer membranes can be formed through various membrane forming techniques present in the state of the art, such as phase inversion (flat sheet or hollow fibre), stretching or template leaching. The uncross-linked membranes are then subjected to a (one- or two-step) cross-linking reaction to improve the chemical stability of the membranes.

(29) Cross-linked halopolymer as described above can be further modified using the native and/or introduced chemical functionality. Examples include creating charge via quaternization of the secondary amines introduced when cross-linking with a diamine which can increase the rejection for charged compounds and which also renders them useful for battery and fuel cell applications.

EXAMPLES

Example 1. Preparation of Cross-Linked PVDF Membranes Materials

(30) Commercially available PVDF powder was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (MW 543 kDa, Belgium) and dissolved in N-methylpyrrolidon (NMP) and tetrahydrofuran (THF) purchased from Honeywell and Acros Organics (Belgium) respectively. Magnesium oxide (MgO), methanol (MeOH), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) where acquired from Sigma-Aldrich and para-xylenediamine (XDA) from TCI Chemicals (Belgium). Rose Bengal (RB, MW 1017, Sigma-Aldrich) or Methyl Orange (MO, MW 327, Fluka) were dissolved in miliQ water.

(31) Membrane Preparation

(32) Loose PVDF-based NF membranes were prepared as described in [Mertens, (2018) J. Membrane Sci. 557, 24-29]. In brief, 20 wt % of PVDF was added to a 90:10 weight ratio NMP:THF solvent mixture. The solution was stirred at room temperature until homogeneous and left for 12 h to degas before the membrane casting. Membranes were cast on a glass plate using a Braive instruments automatic film applicator using a casting speed of 2.25 m/s and a casting thickness of 250 μm. After a short evaporation step of 5 s, the membrane was transferred to a deionized water containing coagulation bath. The membranes were stored in deionized water until further use.

(33) Cross-Linking

(34) The prepared PVDF membranes were cross-linked using a one-pot reaction [Koh et al. (2016) Science 353, 804-807]. The water inside the pores of the membranes was first exchanged twice with MeOH before being transferred to a beaker containing the cross-linking solution. The cross-linking mixture contained 4.5 wt % of NaOH, 18.2 wt % of XDA and 9.1 wt % of MgO. The reagents were mixed vigorously with the MeOH for 10 min and sonicated subsequently for 5 min. After respectively 0, 6, 24, 30 and 120 h of cross-linking, the cross-linking was stopped by transferring the membranes to a 1M HCl solution for 2 h. The membranes were washed 3 times with MeOH (1 h) and stored in deionized water until further use.

(35) The cross-linking solution was prepared by dissolving 4 g of para-xylenediamine, 2 g MgO and 1 g of NaOH in 15 g of MeOH. The solution was stirred to enhance the dissolution of XDA and NaOH and sonicated to ensure good dispersion of the MgO. The membranes were then immersed in the solution, the headspace above the solution was flushed with N.sub.2 and the recipient was kept in complete darkness to eliminate reagent degradation. The membranes were kept in this solution for various times. Cross-linking was found to occur instantaneously with a positive correlation between cross-linking time and degree of conversion. An optimal value was found at 24 h.

(36) This one-pot cross-linking reaction through simultaneous dehydrofluorination and cross-linking of PVDF (FIG. 2) results in the formation of a secondary amine and can thus be followed through IR spectroscopy. The IR spectra as function of cross-linking time (FIG. 3), reveal that (i) the vibration modes associated with the pristine PVDF reduce in intensity with increasing cross-linking time, and (ii) a new broad peak appears around 1600 cm−1 which increases in intensity with increasing cross-linking time. As the position of this can correspond to both the N—H scissoring of the secondary amine as to the C═C stretching from dehydrofluorinated moieties in the PVDF chain, a reference 120 h dehydrofluorinated sample was prepared and compared with the 120 h cross-linked PVDF sample (FIG. 4). As expected, the dehydrofluorinated PVDF sample shows a relatively broad peak in the same region. However, the peak of the cross-linked sample has a much higher intensity and its maximum is shifter towards lower wavenumbers. The peak around 1600 cm−1 can thus be attributed to both the dehydrofluorination and cross-linking reaction. As there is a relationship between the cross-linking time and the two observed phenomena, this shows that the degree of cross-linking increases with increasing cross-linking time.

Example 2. Filtration Experiments

(37) Membrane performance was screened in dead-end mode using a high-throughput filtration setup containing 16 membrane positions with an active filtration area of 0.00177 m.sup.2 operated at 10 bar. An aqueous solution of 35 μM RB (Rose Bengal) or MO (methyl orange) was used as feed and was stirred at 500 rpm to minimize concentration polarization. Permeate was discarded until membranes reached steady state after which at least 5 g of permeate was collected for analysis. Membrane permeance (P) was determined through equation 1 by weighing the collected permeate (with V=permeate volume, A=active membrane area, t=permeate collection time and ΔP=pressure). Retention (R) was determined using equation 2 (with Cp=solute concentration permeate and Cf=feed solute concentration). The dye concentration in feed and permeate were analyzed spectrophotometrically using a Shimadzu UV-1800 UV-VIS spectrophotometer.

(38) P = V A . t . Δ P ( equation 1 ) R = ( 1 - c p c f ) .Math. 100 % ( equation 2 )

Example 3. Membrane Characterization

(39) The chemical functionality of the membrane was analyzed through Attenuated Total Reflection infrared (ATR-FTIR) using a Bruker Alpha instrument equipped with a Germanium crystal. A total of 64 scans was collected for each sample with a resolution of 2 cm−1.

(40) Membrane cross-section morphology was analyzed through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Cross-sections were obtained by fracturing the membranes in liquid nitrogen and fixing them on carbon tape. The samples were coated with an Au/Pd alloy using a JEOL Auto Fine Coater (JFC-1700) to minimize sample charging. Images were acquired using a JEOL JSM-6010 LV microscope operated at 10 kV. EDX Analysis was performed on a Phillips XL30-FEG microscope operated at 10 kV. A point analysis was performed at 7 different location on the membrane. The results were averaged and the elements from the coating were mathematically filtered out. X-ray diffraction patterns of the membranes were recorded on a STOE stadi P diffractometer in transmission mode using CuKα radiation (λ=1.5418 Å).

(41) The influence of cross-linking on the membrane permeance was investigated through pure water filtrations. As can be seen from FIG. 5, there is a small variation in the membrane permeance before cross-linking (black bars), attributed to small intra-sample variations. A small decrease in permeance can be observed for all cross-linked samples but this decrease is only significant at 120 h cross-linking time. This could probably be attributed to the swelling and subsequent rearrangement and cross-linking of the PVDF chains in the MeOH-based cross-linking reaction which could result in a densified toplayer.

Example 4. Filtration Performance

(42) The filtration characteristics after filtration with 35 μM Rose Bengal and Methyl Orange in MilliQ water for the uncross-linked and 24 h cross-linked membranes are summarized in Table 1. The elemental composition of the membranes analyzed via SEM-EDX on the topview of the membranes can be found in table 2.

(43) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Filtration data using 35 μM RB in MilliQ water at 10 bar for the uncross-linked and 24 h cross-linked membrane. Cross-linking Permeance Retention [%] time (h) [l/m.sup.2 .Math. h .Math. bar] Rose Bengal Methyl Orange 0 0.68 90 49 24 0.66 100 91

(44) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Elemental composition determined via SEM- EDX on the membrane toplayer for the uncross- linked and 24 h cross-linked membrane. Cross-linking time (h) C (%) F (%) N (%) 0 75.62 ± 0.89 24.34 ± 1.11 0.04 ± 0.05 24 80.22 ± 1.61 18.79 ± 1.00 0.99 ± 0.87

(45) Cross-linked PVDF-based nanofiltration membranes were prepared, as described in Example 1, with a cross-linking time of 24 h. The membranes were tested for filtration performance in EtOH, iPrOH, ACN, DMF and 80/20 H.sub.2O/DMF. The filtration characteristics after filtration with 35 μM Rose Bengal in the respective solvents are shown in Table 3. Filtration in alcohols and H.sub.2O/DMF do not show any sign of swelling but ACN and certainly DMF did show some influence of swelling. Swelling was completely reversible as no significant RB rejection changes were observed when performing filtration with EtOH afterwards. Optimization of cross-linking towards specific solvents can minimize impact of the swelling on the membrane performance.

(46) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Filtration performance using 35 μM RB in various solvents at 10 bar for the 24 h cross-linked membrane. Permeance Solvent [l/m.sup.2 .Math. h .Math. bar] Retention [%] EtOH 0.10 91 iPrOH 0.02 96 ACN 9.9 77 DMF 2.16 32 H.sub.2O—DMF 1.14 83

Example 5. Solvent Activation Effect

(47) After filtration in the solvents mentioned in example 2, the specific coupons were re-tested for their filtration performance in EtOH. The resulting EtOH/RB filtration data can be shown in table 4. A solvent-activation effect can be observed that drastically improves membrane performance with small changes in rejection. Solvent activation can thus be used as a tool to fine-tune membrane performance.

(48) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Filtration data for 35 μM RB in EtOH at 10 bar after filtrating the coupons with different solvents showing the solvent activating effect. Permeance Solvent [l/m.sup.2 .Math. h .Math. bar] Retention [%] EtOH 0.24 91 EtOH after ACN 1.85 95 EtOH after DMF 2.43 89

(49) Cross-linked PVDF-based nanofiltration membranes with 24 h cross-linking time were also tested for their performance in extreme pH conditions. These conditions were simulated using HCl and NaOH solutions in MilliQ water for respectively the acidic and alkaline conditions. As can be seen from table 5, the permeance of the membranes is somewhat affected by the extreme conditions but the rejection remains the same, confirming that the separating power of the membrane which is crucial for the accomplishment of a certain separation remains unaffected by the extreme conditions.

(50) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Filtration data before and after subjection to 120 h 5M HCl and 5M NaOH for 35 μM RB in MilliQ water at 10 bar. Permeance Retention [l/m2 .Math. h .Math. bar] [%] Permeance Retention 5M HCl 5M NaOH [l/m.sup.2 .Math. h .Math. bar] [%] before 0.18 99 0.16 100 after 0.09 99 0.14 98

(51) A densification of the toplayer should also be further evidenced in the membrane retention (FIG. 6). The RB (MW=1017 Da) retention increased from 90% to 99+% for moderate cross-linking times (6-30 h) and then decreased again to 95% when using very long cross-linking times. This decrease possibly results from the easier generation of defects in the more brittle membranes that were cross-linked for long times. For the smaller MO (MW=327 Da), similar observations were made: the retention increases from 50% for the reference PVDF membrane to reach a maximum at 91% for the 24 h cross-linked sample. These observations further evidence that during the cross-linking process, the PVDF matrix is swollen which gives the polymer chains enhanced chain mobility, allowing them to be cross-linked into a denser toplayer. Although cross-linking is often used to improve the solvent resistance of polymeric membranes, cross-linking could thus also be a way to improve the separation performance.

(52) Cross-section images acquired via SEM can be seen in FIG. 7. All membranes show the typical porous structure of membranes prepared via phase inversion containing macrovoids. Nor low nor high magnification SEM images (supplementary information) show visible indication of toplayer densification. The densification thus only seems occur at nanoscale, as could be anticipated as no significant change in permeance was observed.

(53) Further evidence for the cross-linking reaction was provided through EDX-based elemental composition analysis. As can be seen in Table 6, the nitrogen content in the membrane, associated with the cross-linking, increases with time and the fluorine content, associated with the dehydrofluorination, decreases with time. This thus provides further evidence for a true one-pot reaction where dehydrofluorination and cross-linking occur simultaneously.

(54) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Elemental composition (atom %) determined via EDX as function of cross-linking time. Cross-linking time (h) C (%) F (%) N (%) 0 75.62 ± 0.89 24.34 ± 1.11 0.04 ± 0.05 6 77.59 ± 0.70 22.03 ± 0.93 0.37 ± 0.42 24 80.22 ± 1.61 18.79 ± 1.00 0.99 ± 0.87 30 81.82 ± 1.28 17.99 ± 1.48 0.19 ± 0.22 120 87.45 ± 1.94 11.39 ± 0.59 1.16 ± 0.76

(55) Further physicochemical characterization of the membrane is required to fully understand the cross-linking process and its consequences. PVDF is a semi crystalline polymer that can be ordered in different crystal structures according to the processing of the material [Chang et al. (2016) J. Memb. Sci. 513, 186-196; Tao M (2013) Desalination 316, 137-145]. As can be seen from FIG. 8, the reference PVDF sample shows the typical peaks of predominantly the thermodynamically stable β-phase [Wan et al. (2017) J. Mater. Chem. A. 5 3091-3128; Cui et al. (2015) Prog. Polym. Sci. 51, 94-126]. With increasing cross-linking time, more and more segments of the PVDF chain are dehydrofluorinated and cross-linked which will prevent regular stacking of the polymer chains. This can be seen from the diffraction patterns as the intensity of the peaks associated with the β-phase decreases with increasing cross-linking time.

(56) The DSC profiles (FIG. 9) provide further confirmation thereof. The reference PVDF samples shows a crystallization enthalpy of 37.7 J/g at 134.6° C. The crystallization enthalpy decreases with increasing cross-linking time to 4.9 J/g for the 120 h sample. It can also be seen that the crystallization temperature shifts towards lower temperatures pointing towards less stable crystallites in the material, which can be explained by the reduced stacking ability of chains with cross-links and/or dehydrofluorinated moieties.

(57) Finally, also the mechanical properties of the membranes were investigated. As cross-linking converts the linear polymer chains that form the membrane into a network polymer, the membrane is expected to become more brittle. This is evidenced by the DMA results shown in Table 7. The maximum load and tensile extension at maximum load decrease with increasing contact time.

(58) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Dynamic mechanical analysis result as function of membrane cross-linking time. 0 h 6 h 24 h 30 h 120 h Maximum load (N) 4.0 3.1 2.5 2.7 1.8 Tensile extension at 13.3 8.6 2.9 1.4 0.6 Maximum Load (mm) Elongation-at-break (%) 67 43 15 7 3 Modulus (MPa) 42.9 43.1 36.7 59.7 45.4

Example 6 Thermal Properties

(59) Thermal properties of the samples were studied using a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) Q500 and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) Q2000 instrument from TA Instruments. The thermal degradation process was analyzed through TGA by heating approximately 5 mg of sample up to 800° C. at 10° C./min in N2 atmosphere. Thermal transitions were studied through DSC. Approximately 5 mg of sample was sealed hermetically in an aluminium pan which was heated to 200° C. at 5° C./min, kept there for 10 minutes, subsequently cooled down at 5° C./min to 50° C. and kept isothermal another 10 min before the final heating step to 200° C. at 5° C./min.

(60) The thermal stability of the cross-linked PVDF was investigated through TGA in N.sub.2 atmosphere (FIG. 10). The reference PVDF sample shows a good thermal stability with no degradation below 400° C. Cross-linking of up to 30 h results in a slightly decreased thermal stability with less than 10% weight loss below 325° C. In contrast, the 120 h sample has lost most of its thermally stability with already 10% weight loss at 220° C. This can be attributed to 2 effects, (i) the cross-linking results in the presence of more thermal labile secondary amine groups, and (ii) the decreased crystallinity points towards less strong interaction between the polymer chains which would make them more thermally labile [Yu et al. (2009) J. Memb. Sci. 337, 257-265].

Example 7 PH Resistance

(61) Membrane pH stability was tested in caustic (pH=14) and acidic (pH=0) conditions by soaking the membranes for 125 h in respectively 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. Filtration performance before and after this treatment was tested using RB in water. Filtrations were performed using the same high-throughput filtration setup as described in 2.4. The 24 h cross-linked membranes were tested for their performance after treatment for 125 h in pH 0 and 14 solutions. The membrane coupons were filtrated before and after the treatment to assess changes in their separation performance (FIG. 11). PVDF is generally not considered for application in extreme caustic conditions because of its susceptibility in these conditions towards dehydrofluorination. As can be seen from the graph, the effect of the extreme pH on the retention is minor. In caustic conditions, an increase of 97% to 100% RB retention is observed, whereas acidic treatment leads to a small decline from 95% to 91%. In permeance, exactly the opposite trends are observed. Acidic conditions lead to a 100% increase in permeance whereas caustic conditions cause a 25% drop. These results show that, although small changes are observed, cross-linked PVDF membranes are applicable in both caustic and acidic conditions. In addition, such acidic or caustic treatment can be used considered as a postsynthetic membrane modification step to shift permeance or retention more towards the desired value, whichever is preferred for the application.

(62) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Comparison with commercial NF membranes applicable in extreme pH (1M HCl and 1M NaOH, data taken from manufacturers website. MWCO Permeance pH- Manufacturer Product Material (Da) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. h .Math. bar) range Microdyn- NP030 PES 500 1 0-14 Nadir Koch 8040 PSF 200 2.1 0-14 MPS-34 XL-PVDF 24 h XL-PVDF <327 0.7 0-14

(63) The above experiments were repeated whereby the concentration of HCl and NaOH was increased from 1 to 5 M.

(64) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 properties of cross-linked PVDF membranes upon treatment with 5M NaOH and 5M HCl Permeance Retention [LMH/bar] stddev [%] stddev 5M HCl before 0.18 0.05 99% 0% after 0.09 0.03 99% 0% 5M NaOH before 0.16 0.02 100%  0% after 0.14 0.05 98% 0%

Example 8. Additional Treatment of Membranes

(65) Cross linked membranes as prepared above were dried and subsequently treated with solvent. Table 10 and FIG. 12 show that the permeance and retention changes after this treatment.

(66) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 properties of cross-linked PVDF membranes after drying Permeance Solvent [l/m.sup.2 .Math. h .Math. bar] Retention [%] EtOH 0.10 91 iPrOH 0.02 96 ACN 9.9 77 DMF 2.16 32 ACN (after drying) 146.1 98 Tol (after drying) 0.94 98 DMF (after drying) 2.16 75 H2O—DMF 1.14 83

Example 9. Filtration of MOF Nanoparticles

(67) Cross-linked PVDF-based ultrafiltration membranes were prepared by dissolving 16 wt % of PVDF in DMF. The solution was stirred until homogeneous and left to degas for several hours before casting a 250 μm layer. The cast film was immediately transferred to a deionized water bath and left there for at least 30 min to ensure complete phase separation. The membranes were cross-linked for 24 h using the conditions described above. The resulting cross-linked ultrafiltration membranes were used for the purification of various prototypical MOF nanoparticles (ZIF-8, ZIF-67, HKUST-1 and UiO-66) prepared in different solvent systems (MeOH, H.sub.2O/EtOH/DMF and DMF/HCl. Using diafiltration, all MOF nanoparticles were purified up to >99.9% with nanoparticle rejections higher than 99.9%. No significant changes in particle crystallinity nor particle size were observed.

(68) The above examples show diamine cross-linked PVDF membranes with excellent stability and performance under extreme pH conditions. Cross-linking of loose PVDF membranes resulted in a large improvement in MWCO without compromising permeance. The best membrane performance was obtained after 24 h of cross-linking which decreased the MWCO from 1017 Da to below 327 Da. This was attributed to a swelling and subsequent toplayer densification during the cross-linking process. The cross-linking process itself was characterized through FTIR and EDX based analysis and was shown to proceed with increasing conversion between 0 and 120 h. The physicochemical properties of the membranes were altered quite strongly. A large fraction of the crystallinity was removed and also the thermal and mechanical stability of the membranes is affected, especially for very long cross-linking times.