Polymeric olefinic composition, lignin use and object

Abstract

An olefinic polymer composition comprising at least one polyolefin, as well as a broadleaf tree lignin with pH below 7. The invention further relates to objects obtained from such a composition, and the use of broadleaf tree lignin with pH below 7 in the preparation of an olefinic polymer composition.

Claims

1. An olefinic polymer composition comprising at least one polyolefin and a eucalyptus lignin with a pH 7 from 3 to 6, wherein the polyolefin consists of polypropylene, wherein the lignin content is from 5% to 30% of the total weight of the composition, wherein the olefinic polymer composition has increased tensile stiffness and melt flow index (MFI) when compared to a pure polypropylene, and wherein the lignin is Kraft lignin.

2. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the lignin has a nearly equitable ratio between fragments originating from trans-coniferyl and trans-sinapyl alcohols, with a portion of fragments from trans-p-coumaryl alcohol.

3. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the purity of the lignin is greater than or equal to 85%.

4. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the lignin content is from 10% to 30% of the total weight of the composition.

5. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the polyolefin is a homopolymeric polypropylene.

6. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, further comprising one or more additional polymers selected from the group consisting of polyamides, polyesters, polyalkylene glycols, polyacrylates, polymethylmethacrylate, and combinations thereof.

7. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, further comprising one or more additives selected from the group consisting of anti-oxidants, anti-UV agents, lubricants, plasticizers, stabilizers, compatibilizers, impact modifiers, pigments, dyes, antiflame agents and colorants.

8. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, further comprising fillers and/or reinforcements selected from the group consisting of talc, calcium carbonate, kaolin, mica, at least one clay and fibers.

9. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is a concentrate.

10. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is of reuse.

11. An object obtained from an olefin thermoplastic composition according to claim 1.

12. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 9, wherein the concentrate is a master batch.

13. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1 wherein the tensile stiffness is measured on the basis of tensile strength and breaking strength in accordance with ASTM D638:2014.

14. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1 wherein the tensile stiffness is measured on the basis of Elastic Modulus (GPa).

15. The olefinic polymer composition according to claim 1 wherein the melt flow index is measured in accordance with ASTM D1238:13.

16. An olefinic polymer composition comprising at least one polyolefin and a eucalyptus lignin with a pH from 3 to 6, wherein the polyolefin consists of polyethylene, wherein the lignin content is 30% of the total weight of the composition, wherein the olefinic polymer composition has increased tensile stiffness and melt flow index (MFI) when compared to a pure polyethylene, and wherein the lignin is Kraft lignin.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D—comparative test charts of successive extrusions of PP and composites comprising 30% lignin A (92.5% of lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in PP, FIG. 1A presents flow index variation, FIG. 1B shows carbonyl variation, FIG. 1C presents GPa stiffness variation and FIG. 1D presents tensile strength variation in Mpa;

(2) FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E and 2F—evaluation charts with properties of composites comprising between 10 and 40% of lignin A (92.5% of lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in PP and PE, the presented values therein being relative to the properties of pure polymers, FIG. 2A showing the flow index variation, FIG. 2B shows thermo-oxidative resistance variation, FIG. 2C shows stiffness variation (elasticity modulus), FIG. 2D shows tensile strength variation, FIG. 2E shows variation of breaking strength and FIG. 2F shows flexural strength variation;

(3) FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D—evaluation charts with properties of composites comprising 30% lignin A (93.3% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in recycled PP or PE, the presented values therein being relative to the properties of pure polymers, where the recycled PE is used in a composition with mostly PE derived from industrial scrap and post-consumption recycled PP, FIG. 3A shows variation of the flow index, FIG. 3B shows thermo-oxidative resistance variation, FIG. 3C shows stiffness variation (elasticity modulus) and FIG. 3D shows the tensile strength variation;

(4) FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D—evaluation charts with properties of composites comprising 30% of different types of lignin in PP, the presented values therein being relative to the properties of the pure polymer, FIG. 4A shows flow index variation, FIG. 4B shows thermo-oxidative resistance variation, FIG. 4C shows stiffness variation (elasticity modulus) and FIG. 4D shows tensile strength variation;

(5) FIGS. 4A′, 4B′, 4C′ and 4D′—evaluation charts of composites properties comprising 30% of different types of lignin in PE, the presented values therein being relative to the properties of the pure polymer, FIG. 4A′ shows flow index variation, FIG. 4B′ shows thermo-oxidative resistance variation, FIG. 4C′ shows stiffness variation (elasticity modulus) and FIG. 4D′ shows tensile strength variation;

(6) FIGS. 5A, 5B and 5C—evaluation charts with properties of composites comprising between 30% lignin A and 3% of compatibilizer in PP, in order to improve the interface properties and the visual aspect of manufactured objects, the presented values being relative to the properties of the pure polymer; the compatibilizer was Polybond® 7200, a polypropylene homopolymer graphitized with maleic anhydride, provided by the company Addivant, FIG. 5A shows flow index variation; FIG. 5B shows tensile strength variation; and FIG. 5C shows flexural strength variation;

(7) FIGS. 5A′, 5B′ and 5C′— evaluation charts with properties of the composites comprising between 30% lignin A and 3% of compatibilizer in PE, in order to improve the interface properties and the visual aspect of the pieces, the presented values therein being relative to the properties of the pure polymer; the compatibilizer was Polybond® 3349, a linear low density polyethylene graphitized with maleic anhydride, provided by the company Addivant, FIG. 5A′ shows flow index variation; FIG. 5B′ shows tensile strength variation; and FIG. 5C′ shows flexural strength variation;

(8) FIGS. 6A, 6B and 6C—evaluation charts with the effect of addition of lignin A (93.3% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in the properties of composites, comprising 10% of talc in PP, the presented values therein being relative to the properties of the pure polymer, FIG. 6A shows flow index variation, FIG. 6B shows thermo-oxidative resistance variation; and FIG. 6 shows elasticity modulus (stiffness) variation.

EXAMPLE 1

(9) comparative evaluation of general properties, between the PP and PE polymers, and PP and PE composites comprising 30% lignin A (92.5% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin).

(10) See the table below, with the variation of different properties related to the incorporation of 30% lignin in PP and PE in relation to the properties of pure polymers.

(11) TABLE-US-00001 PP + 30% lignin PE + 30% lignin MFI 287% 103% OIT 2650% >9900% HDT 35% 51% Hardness = = Stiffness 40% 58% (Tensile) Tensile −9% 5% resistance Breaking 38% 78% strength Stiffness 38% 26% (Flexural) Flexural 22% 80% resistance

(12) With the incorporation of 30% lignin in PP and PE, the flow index increases significantly (287% for PP and 103% for PE) indicating greater processability of the compositions, when compared to pure polymers. The incorporation of lignin also led to a marked increase in thermo-oxidative resistance, assessed by the induced oxidation time (Oxidative-Induction Time—OIT) and dimensional stability, assessed by the heat deflection temperature (HDT).

(13) With respect to mechanical properties, the incorporation of 30% lignin in PP and PE did not have significant impacts on hardness and tensile strength (measured at the outflow) and led to an increase in (tensile and flexural) stiffness, the breaking strength and the flexural strength.

EXAMPLE 2

(14) Comparative tests of successive extrusions of PP and composites, according to the invention, comprising 30% lignin A (92.5% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in PP.

(15) See FIG. 1A, flow index variation; FIG. 1B, carbonyl variation; FIG. 1C, stiffness variation, GPa; FIG. 1D, tensile strength variation, MPa.

(16) It can be seen that throughout successive extrusions the flow index (1A) only oscillates, and no increasing or decreasing trend for that property with reprocessing was observed.

(17) Also, no significant increase in the intensity of the carbonyl group absorption band was observed along the extrusions (1B). Only after 6 extrusion cycles, the composition comprising lignin shows an increase in the intensity of the band under discussion. It is known that the increased intensity of this band is observed in degraded polyolefins. The pure PP, by its turn, presents a clear trend of increased intensity of the carbonyl absorption band from the third extrusion cycle.

(18) The rigidity (1C) and the tensile strength (1D) of the composition comprising lignin did not significantly change with reprocessing.

(19) The results show stability of the composition with reprocessing, indicating potential for the material to be recycled by mechanical processing.

EXAMPLE 3

(20) Evaluation of properties of composites comprising between 10 and 40% lignin A (92.5% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in PP and PE. The presented values are relative to the properties of the pure polymers.

(21) See FIGS. 2A, flow index variation; FIG. 2B, thermo-oxidative resistance variation; FIG. 2C, stiffness variation (elasticity modulus) and FIG. 2D, tensile strength variation; FIG. 2E, breaking strength variation; and FIG. 2F, flexural strength variation.

(22) The samples with different lignin contents follow the behavior observed for samples with 30% lignin: increase in flow index, in thermo-oxidative resistance, stiffness (traction), breaking strength, flexural strength and tensile strength maintenance measured at the outflow point (variations of up to ±10%). With increasing lignin content, increase is observed in the flow index, stiffness (tensile) and breaking strength, for both PP and PE compositions.

EXAMPLE 4

(23) Evaluation of properties of composites comprising 30% lignin A (93.3% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) in recycled PP and PE. The presented values are relative to the properties of the pure polymers. The composition with recycled PE comprises mostly PE derived from industrial scrap and post-consumption recycled PP.

(24) See FIGS. 3A, flow index variation; FIG. 3B, thermo-oxidative resistance variation; FIG. 3C, stiffness variation (elasticity modulus); and FIG. 3D, tensile strength variation.

(25) The compositions with 30% lignin in recycled PP and PE showed the same behavior of the compositions with virgin polymers: increase in flow index, thermo-oxidative resistance, stiffness (tensile) and tensile strength maintenance measured at the outflow (variation less than ±10%).

EXAMPLE 5

(26) Evaluation of properties of composites comprising between 30% of different types of lignin in PP and PE. The presented values are relative to the properties of the pure polymer. The types of lignin tested are identified below:

(27) lignin A: eucalyptus Kraft lignin; pH<7; 92.5 to 93.3 lignin;

(28) lignin A′: softwood Kraft lignin; pH<7; 91.9% lignin;

(29) lignin B: eucalyptus Kraft lignin; pH>7; 92.0 lignin;

(30) lignin B′: softwood Kraft lignin; pH>7; 82.5% lignin;

(31) Sugar cane lignin: hydrolysis residue from sugar cane biomass; pH<7; 60% lignin.

(32) See the figures related to the tests with PP: 4A, flow index variation; FIG. 4B, thermo-oxidative resistance variation; FIG. 4C, stiffness variation (elasticity modulus); FIG. 4D, tensile strength variation; see the figures related to tests with PE: 4A′, flow index variation; FIG. 4B′, thermo-oxidative resistance variation; FIG. 4C′, stiffness variation (elasticity modulus); and FIG. 4D′, tensile strength variation.

(33) From the types of lignin tested, only the lignin A (eucalyptus Kraft lignin with pH<7) presents a significant increase in flow index and thermo-oxidative resistance, with increased stiffness (tensile) and tensile strength maintenance (variations of less than ±10% in relation to the pure polymer).

EXAMPLE 6

(34) Evaluation of properties of composites comprising 30% lignin A and 3% of compatibilizer in PP and PE to improve interface properties and the visual aspect of the objects. The presented values are relative to the properties of the pure polymer. For PP, compatibilizer Polybond® 7200 was used, a polypropylene homopolymer graphitized with maleic anhydride, provided by the company Addivant. For PE, compatibilizer Polybond® 3349 was used, a low density linear polyethylene graphitized with maleic anhydride, provided by the company Addivant.

(35) See FIGS. 5A and 5A′, flow index variation; FIGS. 5B and 5B′, tensile strength variation; FIGS. 5C and 5C′, flexural strength variation.

(36) Besides improving the visual aspect of the molded objects, the use of a compatibilizer led to an increase in flexural strength of the lignin compositions with PP and PE, compared to the pure polymers. It was also observed, in the lignin composition with PE, an increase in the tensile strength measured at the outflow.

EXAMPLE 7

(37) Evaluation of the effect of addition of lignin A (93.3% lignin, pH<7, eucalyptus Kraft lignin) on composite properties, comprising 10% talc in PP. The presented values are relative to the properties of the pure polymer.

(38) See FIGS. 6A, flow index variation; FIG. 6B, thermo-oxidative resistance variation; and FIG. 6C, elasticity modulus variation (stiffness).

(39) With the incorporation of 20% lignin in PP with 10% talc, the flow index, thermo-oxidative resistance and elasticity modulus (stiffness) radically increase.

(40) Analytic Methodologies of the Evaluated Parameters

(41) Determination of Lignin pH

(42) 1. Weigh 5 g of lignin in a 100 mL beaker;

(43) 2. Add 45 g of distilled water;

(44) 3. Homogenize the dispersion with a glass rod;

(45) 4. Insert an electrode to measure the pH, waiting for the stabilization of the reading.

(46) Stiffness, Tensile Strength Measured at the Outflow and Breaking Strength

(47) The stiffness, tensile strength measured at the outflow and the breaking strength were measured in accordance with ASTM D638:2014: “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics” using an Instron equipment, 5569 model, under the following conditions: temperature at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, 5.0 KN load cell, test speed of 5.0 and 50.0 mm/min.

(48) Flow Index

(49) The flow index for PE and compositions therewith was measured according to ASTM D1238:13, “Standard Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer”. The assays were carried out at 190° C. with applied load of 2.16 Kg.

(50) The flow index for PP and compositions therewith was measured according to ASTM D1238:13, “Standard Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer”. The assays were carried out at 230° C. with applied load of 2.16 Kg.

(51) Stiffness and Flexural Strength

(52) The stiffness and flexural strength were measured according to ASTM D790:2010: “Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials” using an Instron equipment, model 5569, under the following conditions: temperature at 23° C., 50% relative humidity, 50 KN load cell, distance between supports (span) of 50 mm and test speed of 1.2 mm/min.

(53) Heat Deflection Temperature (HDT)

(54) The heat deflection temperature was measured according to ASTM D648:2007: “Standard Test Method for Deflection Temperature of Plastics Under Flexural Load in the Edgewise Position” using a CEAST equipment, model HDT 6 VICAT P/N 6921, under the following conditions: 1.82 of Mpa load, heating rate of 2.0±0.2° C./min, silicon oil as heat transfer medium, specimen in the upright position and distance between supports (span) of 100 mm.

(55) Thermo-oxidative resistance (OIT)—The analyses were carried out according to ASTM D3895:2014—“Standard Test Method for Oxidative-Induction Time of Polyolefins by Differential Scanning calorimetry”.

(56) The test measures the oxidative induction time, that is the time the material takes to start the oxidation process, at a given temperature, when subjected to an oxidizing atmosphere (O.sub.2).

(57) The assay occurs under the following parameters:

(58) TABLE-US-00002 Temperature Rate Gas flow Step (° C.) (° C./min) Gas rate (mL/min) Heating 25 to 200 20 N.sub.2 50 Isotherm 200 — O.sub.2 50 Sample 6 ± 1 mass (mg) Equipment DSC, Shimadzu, model DSC-60

(59) Carbonyl groups (FTIR)—The objective of this analysis is to verify the material degradation index after successive processing cycles by sample extrusion. To obtain the degradation index, the absorption bands of 2720 cm-1 were monitored, which is considered the reference band characteristic for polypropylene and the absorption band around 1720-1730 cm.sup.−1, of the carbonyl group, characteristic of polyolefin degradation. To obtain the degradation index, a ratio between the intensities of the carbonyl and reference bands was set forth. The analyses were carried out using a Shimadzu spectrophotometer, model IRPrestige-21, each reading being carried out in 32 repetitions from 4000 to 400 cm.sup.−1. The samples were analyzed as films formed from the hot solubilization of polyolefins, or from their compositions in decalin.

(60) Determination of lignin purity—modified Klason method (TAPPI T 222 om-11 methodology: Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp).

(61) The total lignin content is calculated from the following formula:
total lignin content=% Klason lignin free from ashes+% soluble lignin

(62) Obtaining the % Klason ash-free lignin is as given below.

(63) Measuring the solid content of the lignin sample dried at 105° C. If the solid content is below 90%, the sample must be dried at a maximum temperature of 50° C. before the analysis;

(64) Weighing, in duplicate, about 175 mg of dry sample (A mass) in a 10 mL test tube with a screw cap;

(65) Adding 1.5 mL of 72% (mass %) sulphuric acid to the sample A;

(66) Stirring the contents of the test tube to help sample dissolution;

(67) Keeping the test tube in a water bath at 30° C. for 1 hour and under magnetic stirring;

(68) Transferring the contents of the test tube to a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask;

(69) Adding about 42 mL of demineralized water in small portions to wash the test tube, removing all material deposited on the tube wall and transferring the wash water to the Erlenmeyer flask;

(70) Keeping the Erlenmeyer flask (properly stoppered) in an oil bath at 102±2° C. for 3 hours;

(71) After 3 hours of hydrolysis, cooling the Erlenmeyer flask to ambient temperature in a water bath;

(72) Filtering the contents of the Erlenmeyer flask using a sintered glass crucible, previously dried and weighed (B mass);

(73) Rinsing the Erlenmeyer flask with 75 mL of demineralized water passing the wash water in the crucible;

(74) Transferring the filtrate into a 200 mL volumetric flask;

(75) Washing the Buchner flask used in the filtration with 25 mL demineralized water, transferring the washing water to the volumetric flask and completing the volume with demineralized water. The filtrate is used for determining the content of soluble lignin;

(76) Drying the sintered glass filter with the filtration residue for at least 12 h at 105° C.;

(77) After drying, maintaining the sintered glass crucible in a desiccator for 5 to 10 min and then weighing it with the residue (mass C);

(78) Keeping the crucible with the dry residue in a kiln at 550° C. for 2 to 3 hours;

(79) Cooling the crucible in a desiccator and then weighing the crucible with the ashes (mass D).

(80) Calculating the % of Klason lignin without considering the ash content:
Klason lignin content(not adjusted)=((C−B)/(A×E/100))×100

(81) Calculating the % of ashes:
Ash content=((D−B)/(C−B))×10
wherein:
A=Initial mass sample (g)
B=mass of the sintered glass crucible (g)
C=mass of the sintered glass crucible+mass of the residue after drying (g)
D=mass of the sintered glass crucible+mass of residual ash (g)
E=sample solids content (%)

(82) Calculating the % ash-free Klason lignin:
Content of ash-free Klason lignin=(Klason lignin content not adjusted)×(100−% ashes)/100

(83) The determination of % soluble lignin, by UV spectroscopy, is as follows.

(84) Diluting 2.0 mL of the filtered solution (from the 200 mL volumetric flask) with demineralized water (1× to 20× dilution is usually required)

(85) Measuring the absorbance of demineralized water in a cell with 1 cm optical path, at 205 nm as blank (Ab measurement)

(86) Measuring the absorbance of the filtered solution in the same cell and under the same conditions of the blank (Aa measurement)

(87) The value “Aa−Ab” must be between 0.2 and 0.7 ABS. If it is not the case, the filtrate must be diluted until the difference “Aa−Ab” is within the recommended range.

(88) Calculating the soluble lignin content with the following formula:

(89) $\%\mathrm{soluble}\mathrm{lignin}=\frac{\left(\mathrm{Aa}-\mathrm{Ab}\right)*d*\mathrm{Vfilt}*100}{\mathrm{Easl}*M*\frac{\mathrm{Ts}}{100}*\mathrm{CP}}$
wherein
Aa=absorbance of the diluted sample
Ab=blank absorbance (demineralized water)
d=dilution factor (1/xx)
Vfilt=total volume of the filtrate in L (0.2 L)
Easl=extinction coefficient of lignin in L cm/g (110 L cm/g)
M=initial mass of the sample in grams
Ts=total solids content in %
CP=optical path of the cell (1 cm)

(90) Based on the information presented herein, a person skilled in the art will readily know how to assess the advantages of the invention, as well as to propose variations and alternative embodiments not expressly described, but that are equivalent to the invention in terms of function and result, without departing from the scope of this patent as defined in the annexed claims.