MOLECULAR WHITE-LIGHT EMITTER
20200328358 · 2020-10-15
Inventors
- Andreas BEYER (Marburg, DE)
- Sangam Chatterjee (Marburg, DE)
- Stefanie Dehnen (Karlsruhe, DE)
- Jens Eussner (Dresden, DE)
- Nils W. Rosemann (Marburg, DE)
- Kerstin VOLZ (Dautphetal, DE)
Cpc classification
H10K50/125
ELECTRICITY
C09K2211/188
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02B20/00
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
The invention concerns a highly efficient molecular white-light emitter. The invention describes amorphous materials that emit a broadband spectrum of light upon irradiation with an infrared laser. Inorganic nanocrystals form the core of the material and are coated with organic ligands on the surface.
Claims
1. A non-crystalline compound, characterized in that the compound comprises a diamandoid core-structure containing at least one atom of at least one chemical element, chosen from the list comprising C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb, O, S, Se, Te, whereby the atoms forming the diamandoid core-structure are chosen independently from each other and may or may not carry substituents, whereat a compound comprising either Ge or Sn in combination with S does not comprise the substituent p-Styryl.
2. The compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the core-structure is formed by inorganic nanocrystals of the material comprising at least one chemical element, chosen from the list comprising C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb, O, S, Se, Te, whereat the nanocrystals are coated with organic ligands on the surface.
3. The compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the compound exhibits a molecular structure according to Formula I, ##STR00002## whereat the atoms M are independently from each other chosen from the list comprising C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb and atoms X are independently from each other chosen from the list comprising O, S, Se, Te, C and the substituents R are independently from each other chosen from the list comprising aromatic monocyclic substituents, for example Phenyl, Benzyl, Styryl; aromatic polycyclic substituents, for example Naphthyl, Anthryl, Phenanthryl; heteroaromatic monocyclic substituents, for example Pyridyl; heteroaromatic polycyclic substituents, for example aza-Naphthyl, aza-Anthryl, aza-Phenanthryl, diaza-Naphthyl, diaza-Anthryl, diaza-Phenanthryl.
4. The compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the substituents are randomly oriented organic ligands.
5. An electronic device comprising the non-crystalline compound according to claim 1.
6. The electronic device according to claim 5, characterized in that the electronic device is directionally emitting white light.
7. The electronic device according to claim 5, characterized in that the electronic device is selected from the group consisting of laser-diodes, semiconducting laser-diodes, waveguides, light emitting diodes (LED), organic light emitting diodes (OLED), light emitting transistors, LED-screens, OLED-screens, and backlight-devices of TFT-displays.
8. The electronic device according to claim 5, characterized in that the compound is integrated into a monolithic device.
9. The electronic device according to claim 5, characterized in that the compound is applied via vacuum deposition on hydrogen-terminated silicon single crystals and/or on GaAs, whereat the compound forms amorphous layers.
10. The electronic device according to claim 5, characterized in that at least one type of substituent, attached to the diamandoid core-structure is used for further chemical modification and/or covalent attachment of the compound to inorganic materials.
11. A polymer film comprising at least one compound according to claim 1.
12. A device characterized in that the polymer film according to claim 11 is located distant from an infrared laser diode emitting laser light with a wavelength between 800 nm and 1100 nm.
13. The device according to claim 12, characterized in that the polymer film is located between two glass slips.
14. The layer comprising at least one compound according to claim 1.
Description
DETAILED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[0051] Synthesis and Characterization Methods
[0052] All manipulations were performed under argon atmosphere. Acetone was dried and freshly distilled prior to use, as well as all other solvents. Distilled water was degassed freshly prior to use. Trichloro(4-vinylphenyl)tin (R.sup.delocSnCl.sub.3, R.sup.deloc=4-(CH.sub.2CH)C.sub.6H.sub.4) (A) was prepared according to the method reported in the state of the art. [(MeSn).sub.4S.sub.6] (2), [(NpSn).sub.4S.sub.6] (3, Np=1-naphthyl), [(StySn).sub.4S.sub.6] (1, Sty=para-styryl), and [(PhSn).sub.4S.sub.6] (4) are also prepared according to methods reported in the state of the art. Na.sub.2S.9H.sub.2O and all other reagents are purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
[0053] Melting points were measured in a sealed glass tube on a Krss KSP1 N meltingpoint apparatus. Nuclear magnetic resonance (.sup.1H NMR, .sup.13C NMR, .sup.29Si and .sup.119Sn NMR) measurements were carried out using a Bruker DRX 300 MHz and DRX 500 MHz spectrometer at 298 K. The chemical shifts were quoted in ppm relative to the residual protons of deuterated solvent in .sup.1H NMR and .sup.13C NMR. Me.sub.4Sn was used as external standard for .sup.119Sn and .sup.29Si NMR measurements. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Tensor 37. ESI-MS measurements were performed on a Thermo Fischer Scientifics LTQ-FT Ultra mass spectrometer. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis, EDX, was performed using the EDX device Voyager 4.0 of Noran Instruments coupled with the electron microscope CamScan CS 4DV. Data acquisition was performed with an acceleration voltage of 20 kV and 100 s accumulation time. Elemental analysis was performed on an Elementarvario micro apparatus. RFA is done employing a Bruker Tornado M4.
Synthesis and characterization of 1,3,5,7-Tetrakis(4-vinylphenyl)-2,4,6,8,9,10-hexathia-1,3,5,7-tetrastanna-adamantane, [(R.SUP.deloc.Sn).SUB.4.S.SUB.6.] 1
[0054] Na.sub.2S.9H.sub.2O (0.55 g, 2.3 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of 5 mL water and 5 mL acetone. A solution of trichloro(4-vinylphenyl)tin (A; R.sup.delocSnCl.sub.3, R.sup.deloc=4-(CH.sub.2CH)C.sub.6H.sub.4), 0.50 g, 1.5 mmol) in 3 mL of acetone was added dropwise at a temperature of 268 K. It was stirred at this temperature for 15 minutes. The resulting colorless precipitate was filtered, washed with water, and dried in high vacuum to become a fine homogeneous powder.
[0055] Yield: 0.36 g (0.33 mmol, 88%)); m.p.: not observed (slow decomposition above 573 K); .sup.1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMF-d.sub.7): 7.80-8.22 p.p.m. (m, 8H), 7.46-7.69 (m, 8H, Ph), 6.79 (dd, J=10.9, 17.8 Hz, 4H, CH), 5.92 (d, J=17.8 Hz, 4H, CH.sub.2), 5.30 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 4H, CH.sub.2); .sup.13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMF-d.sub.7): 114.94, 126.36, 135.03, 135.32, 136.92, 138.94; .sup.119Sn-NMR (187 MHz, DMF-d.sub.7): 258; IR: 2849 (w), 1626 (w), 1586 (w), 1547 (w), 1490 (w), 1386 (m), 1295 (w), 1185 (w), 1068 (w), 1024 (w), 1011 (w), 986 (m), 911 (m), 824 (s), 728 (w), 632 (w), 585 (m), 449 (s) cm.sup.1; HRMS (m/z; see
[0056] As the compound is intrinsically amorphous, the suggested molecular geometry was calculated and validated by means of DFT calculations (see below).
Synthesis of 1,3,5,7-tetraphenyl-2,4,6,8,9,10-hexathia-1,3,5,7-tetrasilana-adamantane, [(PhSi).SUB.4.S.SUB.6.]
[0057] Anhydrous sodium sulfide, Na.sub.2S, (0.906 g, 11.6 mmol) was suspended in tetrahydrofurane (18 mL). At a temperature of 0 C. phenyltrichlorosilane, PhSiCl.sub.3, (1.61 g, 7.75 mmol) was added dropwise under stirring. After two hours the reaction was continued at room temperature for 22 hours. The solvent was evaporated and the residue was extracted with toluene (18 mL). The solvent was slowly evaporated and the product was isolated as single crystalline material.
[0058] Yield: 0.38 g (0.62 mmol, 33% single crystalline yield based on PhSiCl.sub.3). .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3, 25 C.): 7.49-7.93 (m, 20H) ppm. .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl.sub.3, 25 C.): 129.1, 132.6, 133.1, 135.2 ppm. .sup.29Si NMR (99 MHz, CDCl.sub.3, 25 C.): 8.5 ppm. IR: 442 (w), 454 (w), 473 (s), 492 (m), 508 (m), 555 (s), 619 (m), 688 (s), 703 (s), 738 (s), 794 (s), 863 (m), 915 (w), 925 (w), 998 (s), 1014 (s), 1087 (s), 1106 (s), 1184 (w), 1258 (s), 1302 (s), 1334 (s), 1426 (m), 1484 (s), 1587 (s), 2962 (m), 3043 (w), 3066 (w) cm.sup.1. Analysis (% calcd, % found for C.sub.24H.sub.20S.sub.6Si.sub.4): C (36.43, 35.91), H (2.55, 2.52). RFA (calcd, found for S.sub.6Si.sub.4): S (1.00, 1.00), Si (0.67, 0.66).
Synthesis of 1,3,5,7-tetraphenyl-2,4,6,8,9,10-hexathia-1,3,5,7-tetragermana-adamantane, [(PhGe).SUB.4.S.SUB.6.]
[0059] Phenyltrichlorogermane, PhGeCl.sub.3, (1.52 g, 5.93 mmol) was added at room temperature to a solution of sodium sulfide nonahydrate, Na.sub.2S.9H 2 O, (2.12 g, 8.90 mmol) in a solvent-mixture of water (10 mL) and acetone (8 mL). The resulting white precipitate was filtered and washed with water.
[0060] Yield: 0.63 g (0.80 mmol, 42% based on PhGeCl.sub.3). .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMF-d.sub.7, 25 C.): 7.41-8.04 (m, 20H) ppm. .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, DMF-d7, 25 C.): 130.4, 131.7, 133.0, 133.9 ppm. IR: 420 (m), 457 (m), 537 (m), 617 (w), 690 (s), 732 (s), 815 (s), 834 (m); 883 (w), 929 (m), 996 (w), 1024 (w), 1087 (w), 1099 (w), 1159 (w), 1184 (w), 1260 (w), 1305 (w), 1332 (w), 1432 (m), 1438 (w), 3050 (w), 3070 (w) cm.sup.1. Analysis (% calcd, % found for C.sub.24H.sub.20Ge.sub.4S.sub.6): C (36.43, 36.40), H (2.55, 2.64). RFA (calcd, found for Ge.sub.4S.sub.6): Ge (0.67, 0.64), S (1.00, 1.00).
Synthesis of 1,3,5,7-tetraphenyl-2,4,6,8,9,10-hexathia-1,3,5,7-tetragermana-adamantane, [(PhGe).SUB.4.S.SUB.6.] (5)
[0061] Phenyltrichlorogermane, PhGeCl.sub.3, (1.52 g, 5.93 mmol) is added at room temperature to a solution of sodium sulfide nonahydrate, Na.sub.2S.9H.sub.2O, (2.12 g, 8.90 mmol) in a solvent-mixture of water (10 mL) and acetone (8 mL). The resulting white precipitate is filtered and washed with water.
[0062] Yield: 0.63 g (0.80 mmol, 42% based on PhGeCl.sub.3). .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMF-d.sub.7, 25 C.): 7.41-8.04 (m, 20H) ppm. .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, DMF-d.sup.7, 25 C.): 130.4, 131.7, 133.0, 133.9 ppm. IR: 420 (m), 457 (m), 537 (m), 617 (w), 690 (s), 732 (s), 815 (s), 834 (m); 883 (w), 929 (m), 996 (w), 1024 (w), 1087 (w), 1099 (w), 1159 (w), 1184 (w), 1260 (w), 1305 (w), 1332 (w), 1432 (m), 1438 (w), 3050 (w), 3070 (w) cm.sup.1. Analysis (% calcd, % found for C.sub.24H.sub.20Ge.sub.4S.sub.6): C (36.43, 36.40), H (2.55, 2.64). RFA (calcd, found for Ge.sub.4S.sub.6): Ge (0.67, 0.64), S (1.00, 1.00).
Synthesis of 1,3,5,7-tetraphenyl-2,4,6,8,9,10-hexathia-1,3,5,7-tetrasilana-adamantane, [(PhSi)4S6] (6)
[0063] Anhydrous sodium sulfide, Na.sub.2S, (0.906 g, 11.6 mmol) is suspended in tetrahydrofurane (18 mL). At a temperature of 0 C. phenyltrichlorosilane, PhSiCl.sub.3, (1.61 g, 7.75 mmol) is added dropwise under stirring. After two hours the reaction is continued at room temperature for 22 hours. The solvent is evaporated and the residue was extracted with toluene (18 mL). The solvent is slowly evaporated and the product is isolated as single crystalline material.
[0064] Yield: 0.38 g (0.62 mmol, 33% single crystalline yield based on PhSiCl.sub.3). .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3, 25 C.): 7.49-7.93 (m, 20H) ppm. .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl.sub.3, 25 C.): 129.1, 132.6, 133.1, 135.2 ppm. .sup.29Si NMR (99 MHz, CDCl.sub.3, 25 C.): 8.5 ppm. IR: 442 (w), 454 (w), 473 (s), 492 (m), 508 (m), 555 (s), 619 (m), 688 (s), 703 (s), 738 (s), 794 (s), 863 (m), 915 (w), 925 (w), 998 (s), 1014 (s), 1087 (s), 1106 (s), 1184 (w), 1258 (s), 1302 (s), 1334 (s), 1426 (m), 1484 (s), 1587 (s), 2962 (m), 3043 (w), 3066 (w) cm.sup.1. Analysis (% calcd, % found for C.sub.24H.sub.20S.sub.6Si.sub.4): C (36.43, 35.91), H (2.55, 2.52). RFA (calcd, found for S.sub.6Si.sub.4): S (1.00, 1.00), Si (0.67, 0.66).
[0065] Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
[0066] The TGA/DSC measurements were performed simultaneously on a Netzsch STA 400 with a heating rate of 10 K/min in Ar atmosphere in an Al.sub.2O.sub.3 crucible. The compound decomposes slowly above 573 K in an endothermic process (see
[0067] The thermal decomposition of the compounds in inert Ar atmosphere is observed at about 220 C. (2), 270 C. (3), 285 C. (1), 250 C. (4), 310 C. (5) and 370 C. (6), as shown in
[0068] Methods of Quantum Chemical Investigations
[0069] For density functional theory (DFT) calculations the program system TURBOMOLE Version 7.0, using the RIDFT program with the BP86 functional and grid size m3 was used. Basis sets were of def2-TZVP quality. For Sn atoms effective core potentials (ECP-28) have been used. No symmetry restrictions (i.e., C1 symmetry) during simultaneous optimizations of geometry and electronic structure were hold. The accuracy of the structures was found within the typical error of the method. Electronic excitations were calculated within the program system by using the ESCF program.
[0070] Quantum-Chemical Investigations of Structural Isomers
[0071] According to the obtained sum formula of (R.sup.delocSn).sub.4S.sub.6, two isomers for the organotin sulfide cluster exist. One isomer exhibits a hetero adamantane type scaffold with pseudo T.sub.d symmetry, the other isomer exhibits a double-decker like scaffold with pseudo D.sub.2 symmetry (see
[0072] Calculation of the lowest triplet and singlet excitations, gained from time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations of the most stable isomer, are in perfect agreement to the observed optical absorption behavior. The lowest singlet excitation exhibits 3.15 eV. The lowest triplet excitation exhibits 2.80 eV, being shifted by 0.3 eV towards lower energy due to fact that electron exchange energy is gained in these case. For higher triplet excitations the energies converge beyond 12 eV which is in good agreement with the 13.46 eV ionization energy used in the simulation of the anharmonic potential.
[0073] Linear Optical Absorption Spectroscopy
[0074] The linear optical absorption behavior was examined by means of UV-visible spectroscopy, measured as powder in reflectance mode under ambient conditions on a Varian Cary5000 spectrometer. Sample spectra are shown in
[0075] X-Ray Powder Diffraction
[0076] In order to confirm the amorphous nature of compounds 1 to 5 as well as the crystallinity of compound 6, all samples are examined by means of X-ray powder diffraction. The diffractograms are shown in
[0077] Single Crystal X-Ray Crystallography of Compound 6
[0078] Data of the X-ray diffraction analyses are collected on a diffractometer equipped with a STOE imaging plate detector system IPDS2 using Mo.sub.K radiation with graphite monochromatization (=0.71073 ) at 100 K. Structure solution is performed by direct methods, full-matrix-least-squares refinement against F.sup.2 using SHELXTL software. Table 4 (
[0079] Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculations
[0080] Methods of the quantum chemical investigation of compounds 1-6: For the DFT calculations, the program system TURBOMOLE Version 6.5 using the RIDFT program with the BP86 functional and grid size m3 is applied. Basis sets are of def2-TZVP quality. For Ge and Sn atoms, effective core potentials (ECP-28) is employed. The simultaneous optimization of geometric and electronic structures are done without symmetry restrictions (C.sub.1 symmetry). The accuracy of the structures is found within the typical error of the method.
[0081] According to the obtained general sum formula of [(RT).sub.4S.sub.6] (T=Si, Ge, Sn) two isomers for the organotetrel sulfide cluster exist. One isomer exhibits a hetero adamantane type scaffold with pseudo T.sub.d symmetry, the other isomer exhibits a double-decker like scaffold with pseudo D.sub.2 symmetry. DFT calculations show that the hetero adamantane topology is energetically favored in every case with various substituents (RH, Me, Ph) by 20.7 to 41.0 kJ. For compounds 1-6, the calculated values are given in Table 5 (
[0082] Angular-Resolved Spectroscopy
[0083] The angular-resolved spectroscopy was performed using a 980 nm, 200 mW continuous-wave laser module for excitation. The collimated laser was focused onto the sample using a 5 cm focal-length lens (see
[0084] Time-Resolved Photoluminescence Spectroscopy
[0085] Time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy (TRPL) was performed using a confocal microscopy setup using a streak camera for detection as depicted in FIG. 8, part A. For excitation, we used 100-fs pulses from a Ti:Sapphire laser oscillator with an repetition rate of 78 MHz. Extending its intrinsic operating range, the pulsed could be frequency doubled or tripled. The pulses are focused onto the sample using a 0.5 NA reflective microscope objective. The samples are kept in vacuum inside a cryostat. All measurements are performed at room temperature (293 K). The emission from the sample is collimated in reflection geometry using the same objective and is then imaged either onto a charge-couple device (CCD) camera or onto the entrance slit of a Czerny-Turner-type spectrometer. A spatial resolution <5 m was achieved for optical control by the CCD-camera. Chromatic dispersion was performed using a 40 g/mm grating with a blaze angle of 500 nm. Time-resolution was provided by a standard synchronously scanning Hamamatsu streak-camera. This setup provides a time-resolution of 1.5 ps with an overall time-window of 1.5 ns.
[0086] Steady-State White-Light Spectroscopy
[0087] Steady-state white-light emission spectroscopy was performed using the same optical path and sample holder as for TRPL. A 980 nm, 200 mW laser diode module operating in continuous-wave mode was used for excitation instead of the Ti:sapphire laser. A thermoelectrically-cooled Si-CCD camera is used for detection in the VIS/NIR spectral range. For detection in the NIR/IR range a thermoelectrically cooled (Ga,In)As-CCD camera is used. The cameras are mounted to the second output port of the same imaging spectrometer used for the TRPL experiments. However, here a grating with 122 grooves/mm blazed at 500 nm is used.
[0088] Spectral Response Correction
[0089] All setups were corrected across an extended visible spectral range (300-1100 nm) for the spectral response characteristics to derive the CIE values from the measured spectra. Therefore, a standard traceable tungsten-halogen lamp with a fixed temperature of 2000 K is mounted at a position equivalent to the sample. The spectrum of the lamp was then recorded with both the TRPL and steady state luminescence setup, compared to the supplied black-body spectrum of 2000 K and the correction factor derived.
[0090] Influence of Excitation Wavelength
[0091] To check on the influence of the excitation wavelength multiple spectra of the white-light were obtained using the Ti:sapphire laser tuned to different wavelength, ranging from 725 to 1050 nm. For all these spectra the laser was operating in CW-mode, i.e., not mode-locked. The resulting spectra are given in
[0092] Influence of Sample Temperature
[0093] To exclude thermal emission as a source of the white-light multiple spectra at different sample temperatures were obtained using the steady-state setup with the 980 nm, 200 mW laser diode for excitation. The excitation density was held constant for all measurements. Here, the sample was cooled by liquid nitrogen in the flow cryostat in contrast to all other measurements. The resulting spectra are shown in
[0094] Light Microscopy
[0095] Bright field images of cluster powder layers used to generate supercontinuum were obtained using a standard microscope (Askania RMAS) in reflection geometry. The images were recorded using a Panasonic KR222 CCD-camera. For sample preparation, the powder was dispersed on a coverslip and then capped by another. On a longer-range scale of about 100 m the powder layer is very inhomogeneous with empty spaces between fully covered areas (see
[0096] Microscopy photographs of the compounds 4, 5 and 6 are taken with a stereo microscope (Carl Zeiss-STEMI SV 6) equipped with a standard CMOS camera. The compounds 4 and 5 are obtained as amorphous powders (cf.
[0097] Measurements of the Nonlinear Optical Response
[0098] The nonlinear responses of the samples are measured using the setup depicted in
[0099] Conversion Efficiencies
[0100] Both Mie and Rayleigh scattering are very efficient as the samples are very inhomogeneous and the grain size is in the (sub-)m range (see light-microscopic investigations above and
[0101] As first method, the efficiency was measured only in forward direction: a high-sensitivity thermal power meter (Thorlabs S401C) was placed behind the sample. Benefit of this method is that power density impinging on the detector is relatively high resulting in an accurate estimation of the emitted power. Different filters were placed in front of the detector in order to ensure that only the desired powers are measured, i.e., a 3 mm thick Schott color glass filter (RG850) discriminated the laser intensity and a 900 nm cut off hard-coated short pass filter with more than five orders of magnitude rejection was used to measure the white light emission.
[0102] This yielded a power of 400 mW with only two coverslips without sample in the beam path. Upon insertion of sample in the beam path, this is reduced to 290 mW; however, it was initially mounted out of focus so that the excitation density is below the supercontinuum threshold and no white light emission occurs. This loss of transmitted laser power is due to the efficient scattering of the sample. Powers of 1.6 mW and 7.36 mW were measured for the white light and the residual laser, respectively, once the sample is placed in the focus and the supercontinuum threshold is overcome. This leads to an efficiency of around 0.5%, but changing the excitation spot size by moving the sample into focus also changes the scattering and thus leads to an underestimation of the efficiency.
[0103] To account for the backscattering, the inventors used a 20 cm diameter integrating sphere. While this reduces the errors due to scattering, one can no longer separate the transmitted and scattered contributions and the power density on the detector will be lower resulting in a larger uncertainty of the measured power. This setup yields a laser power of 2.1 mW at the 5 mm diameter output port below supercontinuum threshold. Above threshold, the inventors find powers of 280 W for the white light and 750 W for the residual laser, yielding an efficiency of 20.745.51%.
[0104] To support these values, the inventors repeated the measurements using a calibrated Si-diode based power meter. While this ensures higher accuracy of the power determination due to its larger sensitivity, a proper spectral response needs to be taken into account. The inventors hence used two band pass filters with transmission of 44010 nm or 632.83 nm to measure the power of two different spectral regions. These values were set in proportion to the overall emitted powers by scaling them with the corresponding emitted spectrum. This way, supercontinuum efficiencies of 16.7110.96% and 9.056.02% are found using the 440 nm filter and the 632 nm filter, respectively.
[0105] Thresholds
[0106] The onset of the supercontinuum generation and the destruction limit of the sample are determined in a setup similar to the steady-state white-light spectroscopy setup discussed above. Now, the spectrometer was replaced by a higher throughput system. This is necessary to ensure more than 4 orders of magnitude in detection sensitivity. The driving laser was focused to a spot size of 0.00138 cm.sup.2. The onset of white light generation was observed for 1 mW, whereas the sample degenerated above 70-80 mW. This yields a threshold value of 0.7 W/cm.sup.2 for the onset of supercontinuum generation, and a destruction threshold of 50 W/cm.sup.2.
[0107] Comparison to Thermal Black-Body Emitter
[0108] To further exclude thermal radiation as the white-light source the respective color temperature for every spectrum obtained in the pump-density dependence series was calculated. Then the emitted powers for every color temperature were estimated by integrating the respective spectrum.
[0109] The setup used to measure the spectra does not yield absolute values of emitted power hence only the relative powers can be compared. The normalized powers plotted vs. color temperatures are shown in
[0110] Furthermore a thermal process can be excluded to be the source of white-light radiation by the fact that the compound decomposes above 573 K (see
[0111] Preparation for Immobilization on Semiconductor Surfaces
[0112] A freshly prepared hydrogen-terminated Si (001) surface or an oxide-terminated GaAs (001) surface and 10 mg 1 were placed next to each other in a glass vessel under Ar atmosphere. The vessel was heated to 523 K for 15 minutes.
[0113] Subsequently, the surface was washed with THF, dried in high vacuum and stored in argon atmosphere. For measurements electron transparent foils of the molecular layers on GaAs (001) and Si (001) substrates were prepared in [110] zone axis of the substrates by conventional mechanical polishing followed by 5 KeV argon ion milling from both sides with an angle of incidence of 4 in a Gatan precision ion polishing system. Final polishing was carried out at 1.7 keV to reduce the amount of amorphous material on the samples.
[0114] Electron Microscopy Deposited on a Si (001) Surface
[0115] The high angle annular dark field (HAADF)-Scanning TEM (STEM) measurements were carried out in a double aberration corrected JEOL 2200 FS, operating at 200 kV. A beam convergence semi-angle of 24 mrad was used and the annular detector was set to collect electrons scattered in the range between 73 and 173 mrads. For EDX spectroscopy in the STEM a Bruker Quantax X-Flash detector was used. The clusters form a perfectly amorphous layer on an H-terminated Si substrate as can be seen from
[0116] White-Light Spectrum Simulation
[0117] Without being confined to a certain theory, the principle idea behind the white-light generation mechanism is the reemission from an accelerated electron in an anharmonic molecular ground-state potential. For the simulation, the electron experiences the simplified anharmonic potential (U) of the form:
U(x)=m.sub.0.sup.2.Math.x.sup.2+ma.Math.x.sup.3(51)
[0118] Here, x denotes the elongation of the electron from the potential minimum, m is the electron mass, .sub.0 the normal mode of the oscillator, and a the strength of nonlinearity. This potential results in a restoring force of the form:
F(x)=m.sub.0.sup.2.Math.xma.Math.x.sup.2(S2)
[0119] To get a rough estimate of the nonlinearity, we apply Miller's rule, i.e., for elongations equal to the size (d) of the oscillator the linear and nonlinear contributions to the restoring force become comparable. Inserting the size in (S2) leads to the following expression for a:
[0120] Using this substitution the inventors get the equation of motion of the electron:
[0121] Here, is the restoring force of the oscillator that is comparable to damping caused by radiative loss and E(t) is the driving external electric field. This differential equation is solved numerically using the odeint algorithm of the SciPy Phython library. Calculations are performed on a time scale up to 100 ps width a step size of 0.1 fs. The electric field was assumed to be sinusoidal with the frequency of the pump-laser used in the experiment, for the used field-strength as well as the other parameters see: Table 3,
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0122]
[0123]
[0124]
[0125]
[0126]
[0127]
[0128]
[0129]
[0130]
[0131]
[0132]
[0133]
[0134]
[0135]
[0136]
[0137]
[0138]
[0141]
[0144]
[0146]
[0147]
[0148]
[0152]
[0153]
[0154]
[0155]
[0156]
[0157]
[0158]
[0159]
[0160]
[0161]
[0162]
[0163]
[0164]
[0165]