GOOD-TEXTURE HEALTHY BOILED NOODLE

Abstract

An object of the present invention is to provide good-texture healthy boiled noodles or raw noodles having an effective health function of calcium alginate and excellent in texture by imparting a health function of calcium alginate to noodles, and in addition, without impairing original texture of noodles, and in order to solve the object, in a method for producing boiled noodles or raw noodles employing, as noodle making steps in a noodle production method, (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; and (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings, a 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production, and thus, healthy boiled noodles or raw noodles with the health function of calcium alginate and retaining a good texture of noodles are produced. The present invention provides good-texture healthy boiled noodles or raw noodles with original texture of noodles retained, effectively retaining the health function such as an effect of inhibiting postprandial blood glucose level increase, and in addition, without causing, in production of the noodles, deterioration of viscoelasticity and the like of noodle tissue and deterioration of texture otherwise caused in adding calcium alginate.

Claims

1. A method for producing healthy boiled noodles having a health function of calcium alginate and retaining a good texture of noodles, wherein in a method for producing boiled noodles comprising (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings; and (C) a boiling step of boiling and cooling the noodle strings to prepare boiled noodles, a 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production.

2. The method for producing healthy boiled noodles according to claim 1, wherein the health function of the healthy boiled noodles is an effect of suppressing postprandial blood glucose level increase.

3. The method for producing healthy boiled noodles according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the boiled noodles are selected from boiled udon, chilled boiled buckwheat noodles, chilled boiled Chinese noodles and frozen boiled pasta.

4. A method for producing healthy raw noodles having a health function of calcium alginate and retaining a good texture of noodles, wherein in a method for producing raw noodles for boiled cooking comprising (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings; and (C) a step of cutting the noodle strings into a predetermined amount, a 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed, for production, in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production.

5. The method for producing raw noodles of healthy raw noodles according to claim 4, wherein the raw noodles are selected from chilled raw udon, chilled raw buckwheat noodles, chilled raw pasta and chilled raw Chinese noodles.

6. A method for allowing boiled noodles or raw noodles to retain a good texture of noodles and for imparting a health function of calcium alginate thereto, wherein in a method for producing boiled noodles comprising (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings; and (C) a boiling step of boiling and cooling the noodle strings to prepare boiled noodles, or in a method for producing raw noodles for boiled cooking comprising (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings; and (C) a step of cutting the noodle strings into a predetermined amount, a 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0035] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating comparison in transition of a change in blood glucose level between that obtained after ingestion of udon in which a calcium alginate powder is kneaded and that obtained after ingestion of udon in which a calcium alginate powder is not kneaded.

[0036] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating comparison in transition of a change in blood glucose level between that obtained after ingestion of udon in which a calcium alginate powder is kneaded and that obtained after ingestion of udon in which a calcium alginate powder is not kneaded and a calcium alginate powder.

[0037] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating comparison in transition of a change in blood glucose level among that obtained after ingestion of udon in which a calcium alginate powder is kneaded, that obtained after ingestion of udon in which sodium alginate is kneaded, and that obtained after ingestion of udon having been subjected to a calcium alginate gel formation treatment.

[0038] FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating comparison in transition of a change in blood glucose level among those obtained after ingestion of udon in which calcium alginate powders having different grain sizes are respectively kneaded.

[0039] FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating comparison in transition of a change in blood glucose level obtained in Example 5.

[0040] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 6.

[0041] FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating each Ca alginate addition percentage and an evaluation score (hardness) obtained in Example 7.

[0042] FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating each Ca alginate addition percentage and an evaluation score (chewy texture) obtained in Example 7.

[0043] FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating each Ca alginate addition percentage and an evaluation score (powderiness) obtained in Example 7.

[0044] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating each Ca alginate addition percentage and an evaluation score (comprehensive texture) obtained in Example 7.

[0045] FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 8.

[0046] FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 9.

[0047] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 10.

[0048] FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 11.

[0049] FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 12.

[0050] FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 13.

[0051] FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating blood glucose levels obtained at elapsed times after ingestion in Example 14.

MODE OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

[0052] The present invention provides a method for producing healthy boiled noodles having a health function of calcium alginate and retaining a good texture of noodles, in which in a method for producing boiled noodles comprising (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings; and (C) a boiling step of boiling the noodle strings and cooling the resultant to prepare boiled noodles, a 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production, and a method for producing healthy raw noodles with a health function of calcium alginate and retaining a good texture of noodles, in which in a method for producing raw noodles for boiled cooking comprising (A) a mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to a powder raw material for noodle production obtained through a mixture of raw materials containing wheat flour; (B) a noodle making step of forming the dough into noodle strings; and (C) a step of cutting the noodle strings into a predetermined amount, a 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed, for production, in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production.

[0053] In production of boiled noodles of the present invention, production raw materials, production procedures, production conditions and the like of the boiled noodles, or production raw materials, production procedures, production conditions and the like of raw noodles are not different from those employed in a known method for producing boiled noodles or raw noodles except that the 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production. In the noodle production raw material, not only a wheat flour but also an auxiliary raw material, a mixed raw material and an additive used in known production of noodles can be appropriately mixed or added in a range not changing the effect of the present invention.

[0054] In the production of boiled noodles or raw noodles of the present invention, as a noodle production wheat flour raw material, a known wheat flour raw material used in production of noodles can be used, and for example, a wheat flour used as a raw material for producing udon is not limited to a specific wheat flour in principle, and specific examples of a wheat flour particularly suitable for the method of the present invention include wheat flours obtained from imported wheat of ASW (Australian standard white), wheat from Hokkaido such as Kitahonami, low amylose wheat such as Chikugoizumi, wheat from Kyushu, and other domestic wheats, and a particularly preferable wheat flour is a wheat flour obtained by blending low amylose wheat with ASW or Kitahonami. In order to take advantage of flavor of the wheat flour, the wheat flour can be mixed in a mixing amount of 50% by mass or more, and particularly preferably 70% by mass of more of the powder raw material of boiled udon.

[0055] In the present invention, starch having a higher gelatinization viscosity than the wheat flour used as the raw material can be mixed as a part of the powder raw material to increase chewy texture and viscoelasticity of the texture. For example, oxidized starch such as tapioca starch or waxy corn starch, or modified starch having been subjected to a treatment for increasing the gelatinization viscosity through acetylation, etherification or the like regardless of an origin raw material can be used. A mixing amount of such starch is not especially limited, and is preferably in a range of 5 to 30% by mass, and more preferably 10 to 20% by mass with respect to a total amount of the wheat flour and the starch.

[0056] Besides, in the present invention, starch more indigestible than the wheat flour used as the raw material can be mixed as a part of the powder raw material. For example, high amylose corn starch, or modified starch minimally digested and absorbed by phosphate acid crosslinking or the like regardless of an origin raw material can be used. A mixing amount of such starch is not especially limited, and is preferably in a range of 10 to 50% by mass with respect to the powder raw material.

[0057] When a mixing ratio of starch is increased, vital gluten can be added as a part of the powder raw material for purposes of compensate relatively insufficient gluten. Besides, ones for improving noodle making properties such as fats and oils, and an emulsion can be used.

[0058] In the method for producing boiled noodles of the present invention, the 270-mesh pass pulverized calcium alginate powder is mixed in the powder raw material for noodle production in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production. As an origin raw material of the powdered calcium alginate, any species can be used as long as it is a brown alga, but nigrescence belonging to the class Phaeophycease, the order Laminariales, the family Lessoniaceae is preferred, and although its molecular weight is not limited to a specific molecular weight range, the molecular weight is said to be about 700000 KDa. As the grain size of the powdered calcium alginate, a 270-mesh pass pulverized powder is used, and as the grain size of the powdered calcium alginate, a pulverized one having a value, measured using LA-920, a laser diffraction/scattering grain size distribution analyzer manufactured by Horiba Ltd., in a range of 1 to 50 m is preferred, and a range of 1 to 30 m is further preferred. Preparation of the pulverized powder can be performed by pulverizing a powder of calcium alginate by an ordinary method using grinding means such as a ball mill, and classifying the pulverized powder by classifying means such as a mesh screen into a predetermined mesh pass pulverized powder. Alternatively, it is appropriately available from commercially available standardized products.

[0059] Regarding the mixing ratio of mixing the powdered calcium alginate, it is mixed in a ratio of 4 to 8 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the powder raw material for noodle production, and it is mixed more preferably in a ratio of 5 to 6 parts by mass. When the mixing amount of the calcium alginate powder is less than 4 parts by mass, it is apprehended that the effect of suppressing postprandial blood glucose level increase may be insufficient, and when it exceeds 8 parts by mass, the texture may be deteriorated in some cases.

[0060] In the mixing and kneading step of kneading a dough by adding kneading water to the powder raw material for noodle production in the method for producing boiled noodles or raw noodles of the present invention, not only a salt but also potassium chloride can be used in the kneading water added to the powder raw material. Besides, when a salt is singly used, its concentration is in a range of preferably 2 to 12% by mass, and more preferably 8 to 10% by mass.

[0061] In the kneading step in the method for producing boiled noodles or raw noodles of the present invention, after premixing the powder raw material with the powdered calcium alginate, the kneading water can be added to knead the resultant with a vacuum mixer. In order to effectively perform the kneading step, for example, a method in which a ribbon mixer is provided on a front stage for highly homogenizing the powdered calcium alginate can be employed.

[0062] The noodle making step in the method for producing boiled noodles or raw noodles of the present invention can be performed using, for example, a roll type noodle belt forming machine or a roll mill, or can be freely performed using a hand-made style noodle making machine or an extrusion type noodle belt forming machine. Incidentally, a noodle belt stiffened by noodle making can be finely cut into noodle strings through a rolling mill and a noodle slitter after appropriate standing time. In the production process for raw noodles of the present invention, after the noodle making step (B) of forming the dough into noodle strings and the step (C) of cutting the noodle strings into a predetermined amount, a powder sprinkling step (D) of sprinkling starch over the noodle strings cut into a predetermined amount for preventing adhesion among the noodle strings can be provided.

[0063] In the boiling step in the method for producing boiled noodles of the present invention, noodle strings divided into the same number may be cut into a predetermined length corresponding to each serving unit to be boiled and cooled, or the noodle strings are boiled and cooled in the lump, and then weighed. A temperature of water used for boiling may be adjusted to 98 C. or more, and pH may be adjusted to 5.0 to 6.0. Boiled udon may be subjected to a dipping treatment in a mixture of cooling water with an organic acid for increasing a preserving property at the time of chilled distribution, or may be subjected to a secondary heat treatment using steam, hot water, microwaves or the like after sealed packaging for further increasing the preserving property. Besides, in a case of frozen noodles, quick freezing is preferred for retaining texture obtained immediately after boiling, and freezing may be completed within 30 minutes after boiling.

[0064] In the present invention, pulverized calcium alginate is contained within udon in a homogeneously dispersed state, and thus, an operational advantage of maximizing the function of calcium alginate without missing the timing of digesting and absorbing udon can be obtained. Besides, pulverized calcium alginate does not excessively absorb water like water-soluble alginate, and hence does not inhibit gluten film formation in a dough in the kneading step, and therefore, an effect that deterioration in slippiness and good feeling on the tongue can be prevented with retaining appropriate hardness and elasticity in the texture of udon can be obtained.

EXAMPLES

[0065] Now, Examples 1 to 5 will be given to more specifically describe the present invention, but the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the exemplified description.

Example 1

[0066] The effect of suppressing postprandial blood glucose level increase of udon in which 5 parts by weight (with respect to a powder raw material) or 8 parts by weight (with respect to a powder raw material) of 270-mesh pass Ca alginate is added is examined.

[0067] [Preparation of Udon Samples]

[0068] After powder raw materials shown in [Table 1] were respectively homogeneously mixed, kneading water shown in [Table 1] was added respectively thereto, and the resultants were kneaded at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 10 to 16 minutes to obtain kneaded doughs in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C. Each of the kneaded doughs was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 10 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 3.6 mm using a three-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth with a grove width of 3.5 mm.

[0069] The thus obtained noodle strings were boiled in hot water used for boiling at 98 C. for 13 minutes, then somewhat cooled by putting them in water at 15 C. twice, and dipped in a 0.4% by mass acetic acid solution at 5 C. for 1 minute and 45 seconds. Thereafter, the solution remaining thereon was rapidly removed, 180 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film, subjected to steam sterilization at 85 C. for 30 minutes, and rapidly cooled in a refrigerator at 10 C. to prepare chilled boiled udon having a boiled noodle moisture shown in [Table 1].

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sample Type Operation Operation Item Control Plot 1 Plot 2 (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour mainly 2520 g 0 g 0 g composed of ASW Wheat Flour mainly 0 g 2760 g 2760 g composed of Kitahonami Acetylated Tapioca Starch 480 g 240 g 240 g Calcium Alginate 0 g 150 g 240 g Total of Powders 3000 g 3150 g 3240 g (Kneading Water) 10% Salt Solution 1298 g 1474 g 1570 g Boiling Time 13 min 13 min 13 min Boiled Noodle Moisture 67.4% 67.4% 67.2%

[0070] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0071] Three boiled udon samples in total of a control, an operation plot 1 and an operation plot 2 were prepared, and the measurement of postprandial blood glucose level was entrusted to General Incorporated Association Kendai Translational Research Center. Subjects were 15 healthy males and females (healthy volunteers) over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 180 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 3 minutes in boiling water to be served as kake udon (udon in a hot soup) with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the udon was able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after finishing the ingestion.

[0072] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 2], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 3], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 4], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 5]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose level is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 1.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Control Operation Plot 1 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 15 30 45 60 90 120 15 30 45 60 90 120 Prior min min min min min min Prior min min min min min min Subject 1 95.5 110.0 127.5 117.0 113.0 94.5 107.0 94.5 104.0 125.0 128.0 107.0 107.0 103.0 No. 2 90.5 100.5 129.5 113.5 92.5 106.5 104.0 87.0 101.5 125.0 105.0 93.0 102.0 101.0 3 80.0 127.5 148.5 142.5 124.5 120.5 112.0 90.0 117.5 132.0 135.5 146.0 108.5 103.0 4 84.0 99.0 110.0 128.0 137.0 123.0 108.0 81.5 100.0 136.5 139.5 142.5 113.5 97.5 5 84.5 99.5 120.5 140.0 142.5 111.5 95.5 83.5 105.5 128.5 115.5 92.5 98.0 103.0 6 79.5 114.5 142.0 144.0 127.5 108.5 99.0 81.0 110.5 131.5 129.0 113.5 107.5 81.5 7 90.0 101.0 132.0 139.5 126.5 107.5 110.5 93.5 107.5 137.0 137.5 141.0 124.5 112.5 8 99.5 105.5 128.0 131.5 108.0 110.0 105.5 104.0 123.5 131.0 130.0 115.0 106.0 107.5 9 95.0 133.0 147.0 147.0 139.5 127.5 106.5 105.5 123.5 152.5 151.0 120.0 112.5 99.5 10 86.0 126.5 150.5 168.5 135.0 120.5 104.0 88.5 123.5 147.5 139.5 131.0 117.5 114.0 11 89.5 126.5 141.0 110.0 106.0 97.5 96.0 90.0 110.5 131.0 122.5 110.5 104.0 93.5 12 77.5 106.0 107.5 87.5 97.0 99.5 99.0 91.5 111.0 126.5 115.0 105.0 93.0 88.0 13 93.5 126.0 140.0 129.5 118.0 103.5 98.5 98.0 120.5 129.5 125.0 139.0 116.5 117.0 14 92.0 106.0 135.0 136.5 118.0 107.5 111.0 90.0 110.0 139.5 128.5 109.5 105.0 93.5 15 85.5 109.5 137.5 134.5 139.0 125.5 107.0 95.5 118.0 136.0 140.5 135.0 129.5 109.0 Average of 88.2 112.7 133.1 131.3 121.6 110.9 104.2 91.6 112.5 133.9 129.5 120.0 109.7 101.6 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 91% 77% 64% 72% 64% 32% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Control Operation Plot 2 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 15 30 45 60 90 120 15 30 45 60 90 120 Prior min min min min min min Prior min min min min min min Subject 1 95.5 110.0 127.5 117.0 113.0 94.5 107.0 97.5 109.5 118.5 121.5 118.0 117.0 109.0 No. 2 90.5 100.5 129.5 113.5 92.5 106.5 104.0 80.0 89.5 112.0 111.5 98.5 94.0 91.0 3 80.0 127.5 148.5 142.5 124.5 120.5 112.0 100.0 114.5 132.5 126.5 125.0 111.0 98.5 4 84.0 99.0 110.0 128.0 137.0 123.0 108.0 87.5 108.0 154.0 163.0 150.0 126.0 97.5 5 84.5 99.5 120.5 140.0 142.5 111.5 95.5 92.0 100.0 129.5 138.0 137.5 105.5 96.0 6 79.5 114.5 142.0 144.0 127.5 108.5 99.0 70.0 104.0 123.0 113.5 108.0 81.5 82.0 7 90.0 101.0 132.0 139.5 126.5 107.5 110.5 92.5 106.0 124.0 124.5 104.0 102.0 93.0 8 99.5 105.5 128.0 131.5 108.0 110.0 105.5 101.5 118.0 124.5 117.0 106.0 113.0 106.0 9 95.0 133.0 147.0 147.0 139.5 127.5 106.5 96.5 113.5 147.5 132.5 116.5 127.5 98.0 10 86.0 126.5 150.5 168.5 135.0 120.5 104.0 95.5 122.0 150.0 137.5 117.0 121.0 108.0 11 89.5 126.5 141.0 110.0 106.0 97.5 96.0 91.5 116.0 131.5 123.0 121.5 93.5 103.5 12 77.5 106.0 107.5 87.5 97.0 99.5 99.0 96.0 114.5 132.0 119.5 102.5 89.0 85.0 13 93.5 126.0 140.0 129.5 118.0 103.5 98.5 96.5 116.5 140.5 126.0 114.5 104.0 96.0 14 92.0 106.0 135.0 136.5 118.0 107.5 111.0 84.5 110.5 129.5 137.0 123.0 118.5 113.0 15 85.5 109.5 137.5 134.5 139.0 125.5 107.0 89.5 102.0 128.0 133.5 140.0 114.0 101.5 Average of 88.2 112.7 133.1 131.3 121.6 110.9 104.2 91.4 109.6 131.8 128.3 118.8 107.8 98.5 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 23% 77% 55% 40% 31% 2% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 unit: mg/dl Control Operation Plot 1 Operation Plot 2 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 15 30 45 60 90 120 15 30 45 60 90 120 15 30 45 60 90 120 min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 14.5 32.0 21.5 17.5 1.0 11.5 9.5 30.5 33.5 12.5 12.5 8.5 12.0 21.0 24.0 20.5 19.5 11.5 No. 2 10.0 39.0 23.0 2.0 16.0 13.5 14.5 38.0 18.0 6.0 15.0 14.0 9.5 32.0 31.5 18.5 14.0 11.0 3 47.5 68.5 62.5 44.5 40.5 32.0 27.5 42.0 45.5 56.0 18.5 13.0 14.5 32.5 26.5 25.0 11.0 1.5 4 15.0 26.0 44.0 53.0 39.0 24.0 18.5 55.0 58.0 61.0 32.0 16.0 20.5 66.5 75.5 62.5 38.5 10.0 5 15.0 36.0 55.5 58.0 27.0 11.0 22.0 45.0 32.0 9.0 14.5 19.5 8.0 37.5 46.0 45.5 13.5 4.0 6 35.0 62.5 64.5 48.0 29.0 19.5 29.5 50.5 48.0 32.5 26.5 0.5 34.0 53.0 43.5 38.0 11.5 12.0 7 11.0 42.0 49.5 36.5 17.5 20.5 14.0 43.5 44.0 47.5 31.0 19.0 13.5 31.5 32.0 11.5 9.5 0.5 8 6.0 28.5 32.0 8.5 10.5 6.0 19.5 27.0 26.0 11.0 2.0 3.5 16.5 23.0 15.5 4.5 11.5 4.5 9 38.0 52.0 52.0 44.5 32.5 11.5 18.0 47.0 45.5 14.5 7.0 6.0 17.0 51.0 36.0 20.0 31.0 1.5 10 40.5 64.5 82.5 49.0 34.5 18.0 35.0 59.0 51.0 42.5 29.0 25.5 26.5 54.5 42.0 21.5 25.5 12.5 11 37.0 51.5 20.5 16.5 8.0 6.5 20.5 41.0 32.5 20.5 14.0 3.5 24.5 40.0 31.5 30.0 2.0 12.0 12 28.5 30.0 10.0 19.5 22.0 21.5 19.5 35.0 23.5 13.5 1.5 3.5 18.5 36.0 23.5 6.5 7.0 11.0 13 32.5 46.5 36.0 24.5 10.0 5.0 22.5 31.5 27.0 41.0 18.5 19.0 20.0 44.0 29.5 18.0 7.5 0.5 14 14.0 43.0 44.5 26.0 15.5 19.0 20.0 49.5 38.5 19.5 15.0 3.5 26.0 45.0 52.5 38.5 34.0 28.5 15 24.0 52.0 49.0 53.5 40.0 21.5 22.5 40.5 45.0 39.5 34.0 13.5 12.5 38.5 44.0 50.5 24.5 12.0 Average of 24.6 44.9 43.1 33.4 22.7 16.1 20.9 42.3 37.9 28.4 18.1 10.0 18.2 40.4 36.9 27.4 16.4 7.1 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 18% 44% 16% 28% 16% 6% 6% 29% 23% 13% 11% 1% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 unit: mg/dl Operation Operation C.sub.max Control Plot 1 Plot 2 Subject No. 1 32.0 33.5 24.0 2 39.0 38.0 32.0 3 68.5 56.0 32.5 4 53.0 61.0 75.5 5 58.0 45.0 46.0 6 64.5 50.5 53.0 7 49.5 47.5 32.0 8 32.0 27.0 23.0 9 52.0 47.0 51.0 10 82.5 59.0 54.5 11 51.5 41.0 40.0 12 30.0 35.0 36.0 13 46.5 41.0 44.0 14 44.5 49.5 52.5 15 53.5 45.0 50.5 Average of Subjects 50.5 45.1 43.1 Standard Deviation 14.4 9.5 13.8 T-test against Control Food (Probability 2.8% 6.3% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 unit: mg .Math. min/dl Operation Operation AUC Control Plot 1 Plot 2 Subject No. 1 1556 1886 2074 2 1808 1853 2096 3 5374 3735 1973 4 3998 4545 5149 5 3878 2415 2861 6 4673 3454 3338 7 3191 3806 1706 8 1594 1448 1339 9 4279 2104 2963 10 5220 4384 3281 11 2344 2344 2355 12 2449 1466 941 13 2651 2978 2025 14 2858 2561 4166 15 4601 3731 3476 Average of Subjects 3365 2847 2650 Standard Deviation 1302 1034 1113 T-test against Control Food (Probability 3.6% 4.3% according to t-distribution)

[0073] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0074] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 15 subjects was 88.2 to 91.6 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 45.1 mg/dl in the operation plot 1 and 43.1 mg/dl in the operation plot 2, which were obviously lower as compared with that of the control, 50.5 mg/dl. Besides, AUC was 2847 mg.Math.min/dl in the operation plot 1 and 2650 mg.Math.min/dl in the operation plot 2, which were also obviously lower as compared with that of the control, 3365 mg.Math.min/dl. In other words, when calcium alginate was added in a ratio of 5% or more with respect to a powder raw material, the increase of the blood glucose level was able to be effectively suppressed as compared with that in the boiled udon of the control.

Example 2

[0075] In Example 2, comparison is made to a case where a Ca alginate suspension is simultaneously orally ingested. A case where boiled udon of the control of Example 1 was ingested was a control, and a case where the udon of the operation plot 1 was ingested was an operation plot S1. Incidentally, in 180 g of the udon sample of the operation plot 1, 270-mesh pass calcium alginate in an amount equivalent to 2.8 g was kneaded. A comparative plot 1 was a case where 2.8 g of the 270-mesh pass calcium alginate suspended in 100 ml of water was ingested and then the boiled udon of the control of Example 1 was ingested, and a comparative plot 2 was a case where the boiled udon of the control of Example 1 was ingested and then the suspension of the 270-mesh pass calcium alginate was ingested.

[0076] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0077] The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation. As subjects, 5 healthy males and females (2 males and 3 females) (healthy volunteers) over 20 years old were selected using a BMI reference value as an index. Udon was cooked and served in the same manner as in Example 1, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after finishing the ingestion.

[0078] The thus measured blood glucose level is shown in [Table 6], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 7], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 8], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 9]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 2.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Control Operation Plot S1 Comparative Plot 1 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 120 30 60 Prior min min min min Prior min min min min Prior min min Subject 1 92.0 140.0 133.5 122.0 124.5 92.0 129.0 125.0 102.0 99.0 97.0 149.5 146.0 No. 2 93.0 142.0 102.0 111.5 111.0 88.0 129.0 99.0 108.0 90.0 87.5 117.0 114.0 3 83.5 118.0 88.0 98.5 90.0 84.0 108.0 89.0 98.0 91.0 82.5 111.0 109.0 4 101.0 144.0 112.0 103.0 107.0 91.0 126.0 124.0 111.0 110.0 92.0 117.5 109.5 5 94.0 121.5 107.0 103.5 97.5 90.0 122.0 99.5 96.5 94.0 104.0 138.0 106.5 Average of 92.7 133.1 108.5 107.7 106.0 89.0 122.8 107.3 103.1 96.8 92.6 126.6 117.0 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 2.7% 76.3% 37.2% 19.2% 49.8% 12.5% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Control Comparative Plot 1 Comparative Plot 2 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 90 120 30 60 90 120 Prior min min min min min min Prior min min min min Subject 1 92.0 140.0 133.5 122.0 124.5 128.0 124.5 91.0 131.5 108.0 90.0 103.0 No. 2 93.0 142.0 102.0 111.5 111.0 105.5 115.0 98.5 150.5 121.0 118.5 118.5 3 83.5 118.0 88.0 98.5 90.0 86.0 86.0 84.5 132.5 93.5 88.5 88.0 4 101.0 144.0 112.0 103.0 107.0 115.0 104.5 92.5 141.5 117.0 118.0 100.0 5 94.0 121.5 107.0 103.5 97.5 118.0 111.5 97.5 120.5 110.0 114.5 106.5 Average of 92.7 133.1 108.5 107.7 106.0 110.5 108.3 92.8 135.3 109.9 105.9 103.2 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 62.0% 51.5% 62.1% 85.7% 84.6% 64.0% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Control Operation Plot S1 Comparative Plot 1 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 120 30 60 min min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 48.0 41.5 30.0 32.5 37.0 33.0 10.0 7.0 52.5 49.0 No. 2 49.0 9.0 18.5 18.0 41.0 11.0 20.0 2.0 29.5 26.5 3 34.5 4.5 15.0 6.5 24.0 5.0 14.0 7.0 28.5 26.5 4 43.0 11.0 2.0 6.0 35.0 33.0 20.0 19.0 25.5 17.5 5 27.5 13.0 9.5 3.5 32.0 9.5 6.5 4.0 34.0 2.5 Average of 40.4 15.8 15.0 13.3 33.8 18.3 14.1 7.8 34.0 24.4 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 8.1% 65.6% 88.9% 46.4% 30.0% 20.0% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Control Comparative Plot 1 Comparative Plot 2 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 90 120 30 60 90 120 min min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 48.0 41.5 30.0 32.5 31.0 27.5 40.5 17.0 1.0 12.0 No. 2 49.0 9.0 18.5 18.0 18.0 27.5 52.0 22.5 20.0 20.0 3 34.5 4.5 15.0 6.5 3.5 3.5 48.0 9.0 4.0 3.5 4 43.0 11.0 2.0 6.0 23.0 12.5 49.0 24.5 25.5 7.5 5 27.5 13.0 9.5 3.5 14.0 7.5 23.0 12.5 17.0 9.0 Average of 40.4 15.8 15.0 13.3 17.9 15.7 42.5 17.1 13.1 10.4 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 61.1% 43.5% 60.6% 86.1% 84.6% 56.3% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 unit: mg/dl Compar- Compar- Operation ative ative C.sub.max Control Plot S1 Plot 1 Plot 2 Subject No. 1 48.0 37.0 52.5 40.5 2 49.0 41.0 29.5 52.0 3 34.5 24.0 28.5 48.0 4 43.0 35.0 25.5 49.0 5 27.5 32.0 34.0 23.0 Average of Subjects 40.4 33.8 34.0 42.5 Standard Deviation 9.2 6.4 10.8 11.7 T-test against Operation 8.1% 97.0% 19.0% Plot S1 (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 unit: mg .Math. min/dl Compar- Compar- Operation ative ative AUC Control Plot S1 Plot 1 Plot 2 Subject No. 1 4073 2505 4388 1875 2 2565 2190 2633 3135 3 1718 1395 1808 1883 4 1770 2925 2168 3083 5 1553 1500 1628 1710 Average of Subjects 2336 2103 2525 2337 Standard Deviation 1047 654 1110 708 T-test against Operation 62.1% 37.7% 41.4% Plot S1 (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0079] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0080] As a result of the measurement of the 5 subjects, an average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 89.0 to 92.8 mg/dl. C.sub.max was 40.4 mg/dl in the control plot, but was 33.8 mg/dl in the operation plot S1, 34.0 mg/dl in the comparative plot 1 and 42.5 mg/dl in the comparative plot 2, and thus, the lowest value was obtained in the operation plot S1. Incidentally, it was in the control plot and the comparative plot 2 that there was an obvious difference from the operation plot S1. AUC was 2336 mg.Math.min/dl in the control plot, but 2103 mg.Math.min/dl in the operation plot S1, 2525 mg.Math.min/dl in the comparative plot 1 and 2337 mg.Math.min/dl in the comparative plot 2, and thus, the lowest value was obtained in the operation plot S1. Incidentally, it was in the comparative plot 1 that there was a larger difference from the operation plot S1. Accordingly, it was confirmed that kneading of calcium alginate in udon is more effective than simultaneous oral ingestion of the same amount of calcium alginate.

Example 3

[0081] Comparison in the effect of suppressing postprandial blood glucose level increase is made between boiled udon in which sodium alginate is added instead of calcium alginate, and boiled udon further subjected to a Ca alginate gel formation treatment.

[0082] [Preparation Method for Samples]

[0083] In a control plot and an operation plot 3 of Example 3, samples were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that a wheat flour principally containing Kitahonami was used. In a comparative plot 3 in which Na alginate was added, and a comparative plot 4 subjected to the Ca alginate gel formation treatment, powder raw materials shown in [Table 10] were homogeneously mixed, kneading water was added thereto, and the resultant was boiled for a boiling time shown in [Table 10] after performing the noodle making step of Example 1.

[0084] Incidentally, in the comparative plot 4, etherified tapioca starch having a higher gelatinization viscosity than acetylated tapioca starch was used and its mixing amount was doubled in consideration that texture becomes hard through the Ca alginate gel formation treatment.

[0085] Boiled noodle strings were somewhat cooled by putting them in water at 15 C. twice, and were dipped in a 0.4% by mass acetic acid solution at 5 C. for 1 minute and 45 seconds in the comparative plot 3. On the other hand, in the comparative plot 4, the noodle strings were dipped in a mixture liquid of 0.3% by mass calcium chloride and 0.4% by mass acetic acid at 5 C. for 1 minute and 45 seconds to perform the calcium alginate gel formation treatment. In both the plots, the solution remaining on the noodle strings was rapidly removed, 180 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film, subjected to steam sterilization at 85 C. for 30 minutes, and rapidly cooled in a refrigerator at 10 C. to prepare chilled boiled udon. A boiled noodle moisture of the boiled noodles is shown in [Table 10]. Besides, the grain size of calcium alginate was 270 mesh pass.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Sample Type Operation Comparative Comparative Item Control Plot 3 Plot 3 Plot 4 (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour mainly 2760 g 2760 g 2760 g 2520 g composed of Kitahonami Acetylated Tapioca Starch 240 g 240 g 240 g 0 g Etherified Tapioca Starch 0 g 0 g 0 g 480 g Calcium Alginate 0 g 150 g 0 g 0 g Sodium Alginate 0 g 0 g 150 g 150 g Total of Powders 3000 g 3150 g 3240 g 3240 g (Kneading Water) 5% Salt Solution 0 g 0 g 1215 g 1215 g 10% Salt Solution 1154 g 1474 g 0 g 0 g (Cooling Water) 0.4% Acetic Acid added added added added 0.3% Calcium Chloride not added not added not added added Boiling Time 13 min 13 min 11 min 11 min Boiled Noodle Moisture 67.6% 67.3% 67.0% 66.8%

[0086] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0087] The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation. Subjects were the same as those of Example 2, and cooking and serving of udon and the measurement times of the blood glucose level were the same as those of Example 2. The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 11], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 12], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 13], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 14]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 3.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Control Operation Plot 3 Comparative Plot 3 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 120 30 60 Prior min min min min Prior min min min min Prior min min Subject 1 93.5 152.5 122.5 120.5 108.0 92.5 135.5 121.0 110.0 93.0 89.0 137.0 120.5 No. 2 92.0 131.0 92.5 94.5 106.5 92.0 132.0 86.5 102.5 93.5 85.5 133.0 106.0 3 81.0 114.0 87.5 93.5 93.0 83.5 114.5 85.5 91.5 93.0 85.0 129.0 103.5 4 87.5 157.5 126.0 105.5 107.5 87.0 135.0 101.5 102.0 87.0 95.0 133.0 99.5 5 90.0 128.0 100.5 109.0 94.0 90.0 114.0 97.5 88.0 91.0 96.0 120.5 107.0 Average of 88.8 136.6 105.8 104.6 101.8 89.0 126.2 98.4 98.8 91.5 90.1 130.5 107.3 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 9.4% 16.4% 29.5% 5.5% 42.4% 85.4% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Control Comparative Plot 3 Comparative Plot 4 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 90 120 30 60 90 120 Prior min min min min min min Prior min min min min Subject 1 93.5 152.5 122.5 120.5 108.0 102.5 97.0 90.5 133.0 113.0 109.0 103.0 No. 2 92.0 131.0 92.5 94.5 106.5 94.0 101.0 87.0 137.5 110.0 112.0 112.5 3 81.0 114.0 87.5 93.5 93.0 94.0 91.0 84.0 116.0 91.0 89.5 102.5 4 87.5 157.5 126.0 105.5 107.5 102.5 96.5 95.5 138.0 116.5 93.0 92.0 5 90.0 128.0 100.5 109.0 94.0 96.5 96.0 98.0 131.5 103.5 104.0 104.5 Average of 88.8 136.6 105.8 104.6 101.8 97.9 96.3 91.0 131.2 106.8 101.5 102.9 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 14.0% 9.6% 40.5% 85.2% 59.8% 83.6% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Control Operation Plot 3 Comparative Plot 3 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 min min min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 59.0 29.0 27.0 14.5 43.0 28.5 17.5 0.5 48.0 31.5 13.5 No. 2 39.0 0.5 2.5 14.5 40.0 5.5 10.5 1.5 47.5 20.5 8.5 3 33.0 6.5 12.5 12.0 31.0 2.0 8.0 9.5 44.0 18.5 9.0 4 70.0 38.5 18.0 20.0 48.0 14.5 15.0 0.0 38.0 4.5 7.5 5 38.0 10.5 19.0 4.0 24.0 7.5 2.0 1.0 24.5 11.0 0.5 Average of 47.8 17.0 15.8 13.0 37.2 9.4 9.8 2.5 40.4 17.2 7.8 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 7.2% 14.5% 27.2% 3.6% 40.2% 98.4% 13.4% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Comparative Control Plot 3 Comparative Plot 4 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 120 30 60 90 120 min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 59.0 29.0 27.0 14.5 8.0 42.5 22.5 18.5 12.5 No. 2 39.0 0.5 2.5 14.5 15.5 50.5 23.0 25.0 25.5 3 33.0 6.5 12.5 12.0 6.0 32.0 7.0 5.5 18.5 4 70.0 38.5 18.0 20.0 1.5 42.5 21.0 2.5 3.5 5 38.0 10.5 19.0 4.0 0.0 33.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 Average of 47.8 17.0 15.8 13.0 6.2 40.2 15.8 10.5 11.9 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 10.2% 31.9% 86.5% 51.0% 86.3% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 unit: mg/dl Compar- Compar- Operation ative ative C.sub.max Control Plot 3 Plot 3 Plot 4 Subject No. 1 59.0 43.0 48.0 42.5 2 39.0 40.0 47.5 50.5 3 33.0 31.0 44.0 32.0 4 70.0 48.0 38.0 42.5 5 38.0 24.0 24.5 33.5 Average of Subjects 47.8 37.2 40.4 40.2 Standard Deviation 15.9 9.6 9.7 7.6 T-test against Operation 7.2% 45.5% 38.2% Plot 3 (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 unit: mg .Math. min/dl Operation Comparative Comparative AUC Control Plot 3 Plot 3 Plot 4 Subject No. 1 3668 2678 2910 2693 2 1478 1373 2528 3338 3 1740 1373 2235 1613 4 4095 2325 1523 1778 5 2085 900 1080 1448 Average of Subjects 2613 1730 2055 2174 Standard Deviation 1187 741 745 810 T-test against Operation 4.1% 38.9% 35.0% Plot 3 (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0088] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0089] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 88.8 to 91.0 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 47.8 mg/dl in the control plot, but was 37.2 mg/dl in the operation plot 3, 40.4 mg/dl in the comparative plot 3 and 40.2 mg/dl in the comparative plot 4, and thus, was the lowest in the operation plot 3 in which calcium alginate was kneaded, and second lowest in the comparative plot 4 subjected to the calcium alginate gel formation treatment, followed by the comparative plot 3 in which sodium alginate was kneaded. AUC was 2613 mg.Math.min/dl in the control plot, but 1730 mg.Math.min/dl in the operation plot 3, 2055 mg.Math.min/dl in the comparative plot 3 and 2174 mg.Math.min/dl in the comparative plot 4, and thus, was the lowest in the operation plot 3 in which calcium alginate was kneaded in the same manner as the value of C.sub.max, and second lowest in the comparative plot in which sodium alginate was kneaded, followed by the comparative plot 4 subjected to the calcium alginate gel formation treatment.

[0090] Accordingly, it was revealed that kneading of calcium alginate suppresses the increase of the blood glucose level caused by udon more effectively than kneading of sodium alginate or the calcium gel formation treatment performed in boiled noodles in which sodium alginate is kneaded.

[0091] [Check of Viscosity of Water used for Boiling]

[0092] 100 g of the noodle strings of each of the operation plot 3 and the comparative plot 3 were boiled in 1 L of water used for boiling at 98 C. for 13 minutes in a 1.5 L cooking pan, the water used for boiling was allowed to cool to 20 C. to be measured under the same conditions using a BROOKFIELD viscometer (manufactured by Eko Instruments Co., Ltd.), and as a result, the viscosity was 2.80 CP in the operation plot 3 and 3.33 CP in the comparative plot 3, and thus, sodium alginate was eluted through boiling to increase the viscosity of the water used for boiling. The results are shown in [Table 15]

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 (Rotating Speed: 60 rpm, Spindle: LV-1) unit: CP (mPa .Math. S) Operation Comparative Plot 3 Plot 3 Sample No. 1 2.80 3.30 2 2.70 3.50 3 2.90 3.20 Average 2.80 3.33 Standard Deviation 0.10 0.15 T-test 6.7% (Probability according to t-distribution)

Example 4

[0093] The grain size of calcium alginate added in the operation plots 1 and 2, the operation plot S1 and the operation plot 3 was 270 mesh pass. Different grain sizes of 150 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass are compared.

[0094] [Preparation Method for Samples]

[0095] Udon samples were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3 except that an addition percentage of calcium alginate was changed to 5% by mass with respect to the powder raw material, and that a grain size of 150 mesh pass was used in a comparative plot 5 and 80 mesh pass was used in a comparative plot 6. Incidentally, data of the 270 mesh pass and the control was that obtained in Example 3.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Test Type Operation Control of Plot 3 of Comparative Comparative Item Example 3 Example 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour mainly 2760 g 2760 g 2760 g 2760 g composed of Kitahonami Acetylated Tapioca Starch 240 g 240 g 240 g 240 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 0 g 150 g 0 g 0 g 150 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 0 g 0 g 150 g 0 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 0 g 0 g 0 g 150 g Total of Powders 3000 g 3150 g 3150 g 3150 g (Kneading Water) 10% Salt Solution 1154 g 1474 g 1474 g 1474 g Boiling Time 13 min 13 min 13 min 13 min Boiled Noodle Moisture 67.6% 67.3% 67.7% 67.4%

[0096] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0097] The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation. Subjects were the same as those of Example 3, and cooking and serving of udon and the measurement times of the blood glucose level were the same as those of Example 3. The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 17], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 18], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 19], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 20]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 4.

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Control of Operation Plot Comparative Example 3 3 of Example 3 Plot 5 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 120 30 60 Prior min min min min Prior min min min min Prior min min Subject 1 93.5 152.5 122.5 120.5 108.0 92.5 135.5 121.0 110.0 93.0 95.5 150.0 133.0 No. 2 92.0 131.0 92.5 94.5 106.5 92.0 132.0 86.5 102.5 93.5 94.5 137.5 95.5 3 81.0 114.0 87.5 93.5 93.0 83.5 114.5 85.5 91.5 93.0 85.5 130.5 111.5 4 87.5 157.5 126.0 105.5 107.5 87.0 135.0 101.5 102.0 87.0 99.0 128.5 131.0 5 90.0 128.0 100.5 109.0 94.0 90.0 114.0 97.5 88.0 91.0 98.5 138.0 116.0 Average of 88.8 136.6 105.8 104.6 101.8 89.0 126.2 98.4 98.8 91.5 94.6 136.9 117.4 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 9.4% 16.4% 29.5% 5.5% 97.2% 3.8% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Control of Comparative Comparative Example 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 90 120 30 60 90 120 Prior min min min min min min Prior min min min min Subject No. 1 93.5 152.5 122.5 120.5 108.0 125.0 105.0 96.0 142.0 120.5 103.0 104.0 2 92.0 131.0 92.5 94.5 106.5 105.5 110.0 92.0 134.0 111.5 113.5 104.5 3 81.0 114.0 87.5 93.5 93.0 91.5 96.0 85.0 128.5 92.0 104.5 87.0 4 87.5 157.5 126.0 105.5 107.5 122.5 105.5 92.5 147.5 94.5 96.0 103.5 5 90.0 128.0 100.5 109.0 94.0 109.5 106.0 102.0 136.0 105.5 119.0 104.5 Average of 88.8 136.6 105.8 104.6 101.8 110.8 104.5 93.5 137.6 104.8 107.2 100.7 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 14.9% 36.8% 85.0% 91.1% 72.4% 73.0% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Control of Operation Plot Comparative Example 3 3 of Example 3 Plot 5 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 30 60 90 120 30 60 min min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 59.0 29.0 27.0 14.5 43.0 28.5 17.5 0.5 54.5 37.5 No. 2 39.0 0.5 2.5 14.5 40.0 5.5 10.5 1.5 43.0 1.0 3 33.0 6.5 12.5 12.0 31.0 2.0 8.0 9.5 45.0 26.0 4 70.0 38.5 18.0 20.0 48.0 14.5 15.0 0.0 29.5 32.0 5 38.0 10.5 19.0 4.0 24.0 7.5 2.0 1.0 39.5 17.5 Average of 47.8 17.0 15.8 13.0 37.2 9.4 9.8 2.5 42.3 22.8 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 7.2% 14.5% 27.2% 3.6% 58.0% 25.2% Time (Probability according to t-distribution) unit: mg/dl Control of Comparative Comparative Example 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 60 90 120 90 120 30 60 90 120 min min min min min min min min min min Subject 1 59.0 29.0 27.0 14.5 29.5 9.5 46.0 24.5 7.0 8.0 No. 2 39.0 0.5 2.5 14.5 11.0 15.5 42.0 19.5 21.5 12.5 3 33.0 6.5 12.5 12.0 6.0 10.5 43.5 7.0 19.5 2.0 4 70.0 38.5 18.0 20.0 23.5 6.5 55.0 2.0 3.5 11.0 5 38.0 10.5 19.0 4.0 11.0 7.5 34.0 3.5 17.0 2.5 Average of 47.8 17.0 15.8 13.0 16.2 9.9 44.1 11.3 13.7 7.2 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 90.9% 35.3% 48.4% 55.9% 78.1% 3.0% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 unit: mg/dl Compar- Compar- Operation ative ative C.sub.max Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Subject No. 1 59.0 43.0 54.5 46.0 2 39.0 40.0 43.0 42.0 3 33.0 31.0 45.0 43.5 4 70.0 48.0 32.0 55.0 5 38.0 24.0 39.5 34.0 Average of Subjects 47.8 37.2 42.8 44.1 Standard Deviation 15.9 9.6 8.2 7.6 T-test against Control Food 7.2% 59.5% 48.4% (Probability according to t- distribution)

TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 unit: mg .Math. min/dl Compar- Compar- Operation ative ative AUC Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Subject No. 1 3668 2678 3788 2445 2 1478 1373 1883 2678 3 1740 1373 2468 2130 4 4095 2325 2648 1980 5 2085 900 2153 1673 Average of Subjects 2613 1730 2588 2181 Standard Deviation 1187 741 732 393 T-test against Control Food 4.1% 94.9% 50.0% (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0098] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0099] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 88.8 to 94.6 mg/dl, and C.sub.max was 47.8 mg/dl in the control plot, and was 42.8 mg/dl in the comparative plot 5 and 44.1 mg/dl in the comparative plot 6, which were not largely different, and no significant difference was found among these. AUC was 2613 mg.Math.min/dl in the control plot, and was 2588 mg.Math.min/dl in the comparative plot 5 and 2181 mg.Math.min/dl in the comparative plot 6, which were not largely different, and no significant difference was not found also among these.

[0100] In other words, when calcium alginate is simply powdered, the effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase cannot be obtained by kneading it in udon, and it was revealed that the effect can be obtained merely when it is pulverized to a grain size of about 270 mesh pass.

[0101] [Physical Property Test using Texture Analyzer]

[0102] As a sample for a physical property test using a texture analyzer, a sample corresponding to each serving stored at 10 C. for 3 days was boiled for 3 minutes in a 1.5 L cooking pan, then cooled to a temperature of noodle strings of 15 C. in 1 minute, and drained with a strainer, and measurement was performed after 1 minute from the draining every 5 minutes ten times in total. Measurement conditions were those of a 2-byte method. In the 2-byte method, in first compression, noodle strings are compressed with a plunger by 50% of their thickness to record a change of stress, the plunger is released once, and the noodle strings are compressed in the same position by 97% of the thickness of the noodle strings to record a change of the stress. The stress obtained in the compression performed twice is regarded as an index of the hardness of the noodle strings, and a change ratio of an area under a curve of the first compression and an area under a curve of the second compression corresponding to stresscompression amount was regarded as an index of elasticity. An elevating speed of the plunger was 1 mm per second, and the load was recorded at intervals of 0.01 seconds. The obtained results are shown in [Table 21].

TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 21 unit: N unit: N unit: % Hardness (50% Compression) Hardness (97% Compression) Elasticity Compar- Compar- Compar- Compar- Compar- Compar- Operation ative ative Operation ative ative Operation ative ative Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Sample 1 0.33 0.32 0.35 0.33 0.58 0.61 0.52 0.49 62.3 67.0 60.9 58.7 No. 2 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.32 0.57 0.64 0.57 0.47 63.5 65.7 62.4 60.1 3 0.37 0.34 0.33 0.36 0.56 0.63 0.49 0.57 65.4 64.9 61.6 63.7 4 0.34 0.37 0.33 0.33 0.55 0.61 0.51 0.49 64.0 64.3 59.0 53.5 5 0.33 0.38 0.32 0.36 0.60 0.62 0.52 0.59 61.1 64.4 62.3 62.6 6 0.34 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.55 0.56 0.49 0.51 64.1 63.6 61.4 57.4 7 0.32 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.58 0.66 0.52 0.48 61.0 66.1 59.5 58.5 8 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.58 0.53 0.50 0.50 62.3 62.6 59.6 58.8 9 0.29 0.31 0.32 0.29 0.56 0.47 0.46 0.42 60.9 60.2 57.0 56.9 10 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.36 0.53 0.47 0.48 0.53 64.4 62.0 56.6 57.3 Average 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.34 0.57 0.58 0.50 0.51 62.9 64.1 60.0 58.8 Standard 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.05 1.59 2.05 2.06 2.88 Deviation T-test against 21.2% 92.4% 64.2% 53.2% 0.0% 0.3% 17.0% 0.5% 0.3% Control Food (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0103] As a result, the stress at the time of 97% compression was 0.57 N in the control plot, but was 0.58 N in the operation plot 3, 0.50 N in the comparative plot 5 and 0.51 N in the comparative plot 6, and thus it was revealed that merely the operation plot 3 in which the 270-mesh pass calcium alginate was added was equivalent to the control plot, and that the comparative plots 5 and 6 were significantly soft. The index value of the elasticity was 62.9% in the control plot, but was 64.1% in the operation plot 3, 60.0% in the comparative plot 5 and 58.8% in the comparative plot 6, and thus, it was revealed that the elasticity was significantly low in the comparative plots 5 and 6, and that the elasticity was not deteriorated in the operation plot 3. In other words, it was clarified that the deterioration of texture otherwise caused when it is kneaded in udon can be prevented by pulverizing calcium alginate to a grain size of about 270 mesh pass.

[0104] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0105] The 4 samples having been evaluated in the physical property test using a texture analyzer were subjected to sensory evaluation. As an evaluation method, a 5-point rating scale assuming that the boiled udon of the control plot had a score of 3 was employed, and four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), chewy texture (chewy: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 8 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 22 Hardness Chewy Texture Operation Comparative Comparative Operation Comparative Comparative Powderiness Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Control Evaluator No. 1 3.0 3.5 2.6 2.1 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 2 3.0 3.5 1.6 2.1 3.0 2.5 1.5 2.0 3.0 3 3.0 3.0 3.7 2.1 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.0 3.0 4 3.0 3.0 3.1 4.2 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.1 3.0 5 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.1 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.0 3.0 6 3.0 3.0 2.1 4.2 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.1 3.0 7 3.0 3.0 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.5 2.6 3.1 3.0 8 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.1 3.1 3.0 Average 3.0 3.1 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.5 2.6 3.0 Standard 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.5 Deviation T-test against 17.0% 34.2% 56.7% 68% 5.6% 5.2% Control Food (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture Hardness Operation Comparative Comparative Operation Comparative Comparative Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Control Plot 3 Plot 5 Plot 6 Evaluator No. 1 3.0 3.0 4.1 4.6 3.0 3.0 1.9 1.5 2 3.0 3.0 4.6 4.1 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.9 3 3.0 3.0 4.1 4.6 3.0 3.0 1.9 1.5 4 3.0 3.5 4.1 4.6 3.0 3.0 1.9 1.9 5 3.0 3.0 4.1 4.6 3.0 3.0 1.9 1.5 6 3.0 2.5 2.6 3.6 3.0 3.5 2.4 3.4 7 3.0 4.0 4.1 3.6 3.0 2.5 1.9 2.4 8 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.6 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.4 Average 3.0 3.1 3.9 4.2 3.0 2.9 2.1 2.1 Standard 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.7 Deviation T-test against 45.1% 0.8% 0.0% 59.8% 0.0% 0.5% Control Food (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0106] As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the operation plot 3 had a score of 3.1, the comparative plot 5 had a score of 2.7 and the comparative plot 6 had a score of 2.8, and thus, the operation plot 3 had an equivalent value, and the comparative plots 5 and 6 had lower values. In the item of chewy texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the operation plot 3 had a score of 3.1, the comparative plot 5 had a score of 2.5 and the comparative plot 6 had a score of 2.6, and thus, the operation plot 3 had an equivalent value, and the comparative plots 5 and 6 had lower values. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the operation plot 3 had a score of 3.1, the comparative plot 5 had a score of 3.9 and the comparative plot 6 had a score of 4.2, and thus, the operation plot 3 had an equivalent value, and the comparative plots 5 and 6 had obviously higher values. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the operation plot 3 had a score of 2.9, the comparative plot 5 had a score of 2.1 and the comparative plot 6 had a score of 2.1, and thus, the operation plot 3 had an equivalent value, and the comparative plots 5 and 6 had obviously lower values.

[0107] In this manner, also in the sensory evaluation, it was clarified that the deterioration of texture otherwise caused when it is kneaded in udon can be prevented by pulverizing calcium alginate to a grain size of about 270 mesh pass.

Example 5

[0108] The effect of suppressing postprandial blood glucose level increase of udon in which 5% or 4% of 270-mesh pass Ca alginate is added is checked.

[0109] [Preparation Method for Samples]

[0110] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 23] were respectively homogeneously mixed, kneading water shown in [Table 23] was respectively added thereto, and then chilled boiled udon was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1.

TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 23 Test Type Operation Operation Item Control Plot 4 Plot 5 (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour mainly 2520 g 2520 g 2520 g composed of ASW Wheat Flour mainly 0 g 0 g 0 g composed of Kitahonami Acetylated Tapioca Starch 480 g 480 g 480 g Calcium Alginate 0 g 150 g 120 g Total of Powders 3000 g 3150 g 3120 g (Kneading Water) 10% Salt Solution 1298 g 1650 g 1570 g Boiling Time 13 min 13 min 13 min Boiled Noodle Moisture 67.4% 67.4% 67.6%

[0111] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0112] The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation. Subjects were the same as those of Example 3, and cooking and serving of udon and the measurement times of the blood glucose level were the same as those of Example 3. The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 24], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 25], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 26], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 27]. Besides, transition of an average of change in the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of Figure

TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 24 unit: mg/dl Control Operation Plot 4 Operation Plot 5 Time Elapsed after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 92.0 140.0 133.5 122.0 124.5 92.0 129.0 125.0 102.0 99.0 90.0 134.0 116.0 115.0 96.5 No. 2 93.0 142.0 102.0 111.5 111.0 88.0 129.0 99.0 108.0 90.0 99.0 137.5 106.0 97.5 96.5 3 83.5 118.0 88.0 98.5 90.0 84.0 108.0 89.0 98.0 91.0 94.5 133.5 117.5 114.0 107.5 4 91.0 123.0 115.0 104.0 97.0 93.0 117.0 98.0 107.0 102.0 87.0 116.0 109.5 105.0 99.0 5 94.0 121.5 107.0 103.5 97.5 90.0 122.0 99.5 96.5 94.0 89.0 120.5 100.0 100.0 98.5 Average of 90.7 128.9 109.1 107.9 104.0 89.4 121.0 102.1 102.3 95.2 91.9 128.3 109.8 106.3 99.6 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 3.0% 8.1% 23.0% 22.2% 89.2% 93.4% 76.2% 60.2% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00025 TABLE 25 unit: mg/dl Control Operation Plot 4 Operation Plot 5 Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30min 60min 90min 120min 30min 60min 90min 120min Subject 1 48.0 41.5 30.0 32.5 37.0 33.0 10.0 7.0 44.0 26.0 25.0 6.5 No. 2 49.0 9.0 18.5 18.0 41.0 11.0 20.0 2.0 38.5 7.0 1.5 2.5 3 34.5 4.5 15.0 6.5 24.0 5.0 14.0 7.0 39.0 23.0 19.5 13.0 4 32.0 24.0 13.0 6.0 24.0 5.0 14.0 9.0 29.0 22.5 18.0 12.0 5 27.5 13.0 9.5 3.5 32.0 9.5 6.5 4.0 31.5 11.0 11.0 9.5 Average of 38.2 18.4 17.2 13.3 31.6 12.7 12.9 5.8 36.4 17.9 14.4 7.7 Subjects T-test against Control Food at Corresponding 8.1% 20.7% 34.3% 25.4% 55.3% 93.1% 58.0% 48.3% Time (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00026 TABLE 26 unit: mg/dl Operation Operation C.sub.max Control Plot 4 Plot 5 Subject No. 1 48.0 37.0 44.0 2 49.0 41.0 38.5 3 34.5 24.0 39.0 4 32.0 24.0 29.0 5 27.5 32.0 31.5 Average of Subjects 38.2 31.6 36.4 Standard Deviation 9.7 7.6 6.1 T-test against Control Food 8.1% 55.3% (Probability according to t- distribution)

TABLE-US-00027 TABLE 27 unit: mg .Math. min/dl Operation Operation AUC Control Plot 4 Plot 5 Subject No. 1 4073 2505 2948 2 2565 2190 1283 3 1718 1395 2640 4 2160 1425 2265 5 1553 1500 1748 Average of Subjects 2414 1803 2177 Standard Deviation 1008 511 671 T-test against Control Food 8.1% 60.3% (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0113] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0114] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 89.4 to 91.9 mg/dl, and C.sub.max was 38.2 mg/dl in the control plot, but was 31.6 mg/dl in the operation plot 4 and 36.4 mg/dl in the operation plot 5, and thus, there was a tendency depending on a difference in the addition concentration of calcium alginate, but while there was an obvious difference in the operation plot 4 of 5% addition, there was a slight difference in the operation plot 5 of 4% addition. AUC was 2414 mg.Math.min/dl in the control plot, but was 1803 mg.Math.min/dl in the operation plot 4 and 2177 mg.Math.min/dl in the operation plot 5, and thus, there was a tendency depending on the difference in the addition concentration similarly to C.sub.max, but while there was an obvious difference in the operation plot 4 of 5% addition, there was a slight difference in the operation plot 5 of 4% addition. Accordingly, regarding the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase obtained when 270-mesh pass powdered calcium alginate is added to a powder raw material, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase was obtained by 4% addition, but a more preferable effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase is obtained by 5% addition.

Example 6

[0115] <Addition of 4.5% by mass of Ca Alginate to Powder Raw Material for Noodle Production>: An effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of boiled Japanese soba (buckwheat noodles) in which 4.5% of 270 mesh pass Ca alginate was added was checked.

[0116] [Preparation of Boiled Buckwheat Noodle Samples]

[0117] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 28] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. As the powder raw material, a wheat flour and a buckwheat flour (crude protein: 11.5%, ash: 2.0%) were mixed with modified starch and vital gluten, so as to improve texture and enforce binding of a dough. 270 mesh pass Ca alginate was added in a ratio of 4.5% in an operation plot, and was not added in a comparative plot, and glycine was dissolved in the kneading water for purposes of improving the preserving property. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 8 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C.

[0118] The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 6 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 1.50 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth with a grove width of 1.54 mm. The thus obtained noodle strings were boiled in hot water for boiling at 98 C. for 1 minute, then somewhat cooled by putting them in water at 15 C. twice, and dipped in a 0.4% by mass acetic acid solution at 5 C. for 2 minutes and 20 seconds. Thereafter, the solution remaining thereon was rapidly removed, 160 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film, subjected to steam sterilization at 85 C. for 30 minutes, and rapidly cooled in a refrigerator at 10 C. to prepare chilled boiled buckwheat noodles having a boiled noodle moisture shown in [Table 28].

TABLE-US-00028 TABLE 28 Sample Type 4.5% Item Control Plot Operation Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Strong Wheat Flour 1972 g 1972 g Buckwheat Flour 1232 g 1232 g Modified Starch for buckwheat 295.8 g 295.8 g noodles Vital Gluten 350 g 350 g Dried Egg White Powder 26.3 g 35 g Total of Powder Raw Materials 3876.1 g 3884.8 g (100%) For Noodle Production 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 175 g (4.5%) Total of Powders 3876.1 g 4059.8 g (Kneading Water) Glycine 41.3 g 41.3 g Fresh Water 1278 g 1540 g Boiling Time 1 min 1 min * Boiled Noodle Average Moisture 61.2% 60.7%

[0119] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0120] The blood glucose level was compared with that of a control plot. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation. Subjects were 5 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 160 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 1 minute in boiling water to be served as kake soba (buckwheat noodles in a hot soup) with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the buckwheat noodles were able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0121] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 29], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 30], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 31], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 32]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 6.

TABLE-US-00029 TABLE 29 unit: mg/dl Control Plot 4.5% Operation Plot Time Elapsed after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 85.0 122.5 111.0 105.5 104.0 82.5 136.5 97.5 96.5 91.5 No. 2 84.0 131.0 101.0 99.0 106.0 93.5 127.0 107.5 103.5 108.0 3 81.5 158.0 95.0 109.0 119.0 88.0 147.5 96.5 105.0 101.5 4 82.5 116.5 111.0 86.0 88.0 80.5 106.5 105.5 97.0 89.0 5 99.0 134.0 116.5 108.5 116.0 103.0 128.0 105.0 104.0 116.5 Average of 86.4 132.4 106.9 101.6 106.6 89.5 129.1 102.4 101.2 101.3 Subjects T-test against Control Plot 26% 50% 30% 92% 26% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00030 TABLE 30 unit: m/dl Control Plot 4.5% Operation Plot Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90min 120 min Subject 1 37.5 26.0 20.5 19.0 54.0 15.0 14.0 9.0 No. 2 47.0 17.0 15.0 22.0 33.5 14.0 10.0 14.5 3 76.5 13.5 27.5 37.5 59.5 8.5 17.0 13.5 4 34.0 28.5 3.5 5.5 26.0 25.0 16.5 8.5 5 35.0 17.5 9.5 17.0 25.0 2.0 1.0 13.5 Average of 46.0 20.5 15.2 20.2 39.6 12.9 11.7 11.8 Subjects T-test against Control Plot 34% 4% 45% 13% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00031 TABLE 31 unit: mg/dl Cmax Control Plot 4.5% Operation Plot Subject No. 1 37.5 54.0 2 47.0 33.5 3 76.5 59.5 4 34.0 26.0 5 35.0 25.0 Average of Subjects 46.0 39.6 Standard Deviation 17.8 16.1 T-test against Control Plot 34.1% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00032 TABLE 32 unit: mg .Math. min/dl AUC Control Plot 4.5% Operation Plot Subject No. 1 2805 2625 2 2700 1943 3 4088 2753 4 2063 2153 5 2115 1043 Average of Subjects 2754 2103 Standard Deviation 817 680 T-test against Control Plot 7.1% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0122] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0123] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 86.4 to 89.5 mg/dl, and C.sub.max was 46.0 mg/dl in the control plot, but was a low value of 39.6 mg/dl in the 4.5% calcium alginate operation plot. Besides, AUC was 2754 mg.Math.min/dl in the control plot, but was an obviously low value of 2103 mg.Math.min/dl in the 4.5% calcium alginate operation plot.

[0124] In other words, it was confirmed, in boiled Japanese buckwheat noodles, that when 4.5% by mass of 270-mesh pass calcium alginate is added to a powder raw material for noodle production, the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained.

Example 7

[0125] <Sensory Evaluation Test for Checking Upper Limit of Addition of 270-Mesh Pass Calcium Alginate in Boiled Udon>: By using, as a control, the operation plot of 5% addition in which the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase and excellent texture was able to be obviously both obtained, 7%, 9% and 11% addition was performed respectively as a 5% operation plot, a 7% operation plot, a 9% comparative plot and an 11% comparative plot to check a range in which excellent texture can be obtained.

[0126] [Preparation Method for Samples]

[0127] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 33] were respectively homogenously mixed, and then, boiled udon samples of the respective operation plots and comparative plots were prepared in accordance with the preparation method for samples described in Example 1.

TABLE-US-00033 TABLE 33 Sample Type 5% Opera- 7% Opera- 9% Compar- 11% Compar- Item tion Plot tion Plot ative Plot ative Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour 2760 g 2760 g 2760 g 2760 g mainly composed of Kitahonami Acetylated 240 g 240 g 240 g 240 g Tapioca Starch 270 Mesh Pass 150 g 210 g 270 g 330 g Ca Alginate Total of Powders 3150 g 3210 g 3270 g 3330 g (Kneading Water) Salt 150.6 g 150.6 g 150.6 g 150.6 g Fresh Water 1356 g 1356 g 1416 g 1386 g

[0128] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0129] As an evaluation method, a 10-point rating scale assuming that boiled udon of the control had a score of 5 was employed, and the 4 items of hardness (hard: 10 to soft: 0), chewy texture (chewy: 10 to brittle: 0), powderiness (powdery: 10 to not powdery: 0), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 10 to not preferable: 0) were scored with an integer, and an average of scores of 8 specialized panelists was employed.

[0130] Results of the sensory evaluation test are shown in [Table 34], and graphs of evaluation scores obtained at the respective addition percentages of Ca alginate are illustrated in FIG. 7 (hardness), FIG. 8 (chewy texture), FIG. 9 (powderiness), and FIG. 10 (comprehensive texture).

TABLE-US-00034 TABLE 34 Boiled Udon different in Amount of Ca-Alg Added (5% as reference, 7%, 9%, 11%) Hardness Viscoelasticity (Chewy Texture) 5% 7% 9% 11% 5% 7% 9% 11% Operation Operation Comparative Comparative Operation Operation Comparative Comparative Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Evaluator 1 5 (reference) 6 8 7 5 (reference) 5 4 5 No. 2 5 (reference) 5 6 7 5 (reference) 4 3 2 3 5 (reference) 6 6 8 5 (reference) 3 4 2 4 5 (reference) 5 7 7 5 (reference) 4 3 2 5 5 (reference) 4 3 2 5 (reference) 5 3 2 6 5 (reference) 4 3 4 5 (reference) 4 2 4 7 5 (reference) 6 6 6 5 (reference) 5 4 3 8 5 (reference) 4 7 4 5 (reference) 4 3 2 Average 5.0 5.8 5.6 4.3 3.3 2.8 Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 5% 7% 9% 11% 5% 7% 9% 11% Operation Operation Comparative Comparative Operation Operation Comparative Comparative Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Plot Evaluator 1 5 (reference) 6 8 7 5 (reference) 5 3 4 No. 2 5 (reference) 5 6 7 5 (reference) 4 3 2 3 5 (reference) 7 6 8 5 (reference) 4 4 2 4 5 (reference) 5 7 6 5 (reference) 4 3 2 5 5 (reference) 6 8 9 5 (reference) 4 3 2 6 5 (reference) 5 4 5 5 (reference) 4 3 4 7 5 (reference) 4 6 9 5 (reference) 5 2 1 8 5 (reference) 5 6 8 5 (reference) 2 3 1 Average 5.4 6.4 7.4 4.0 3.0 2.3

[0131] As a result, as an average score of the item of hardness, as compared with the 5% operation plot of the control (reference score of 5), the 7% operation plot had a score of 5.0, the 9% comparative plot had a score of 5.8 and the 11% comparative plot had a score of 5.6, and thus, there was not a difference of a score of 1 in all the operation plot and comparative plots as compared with the reference score of 5. As an average score of the item of chewy texture, as compared with the 5% operation plot of the control (reference score of 5), the 7% operation plot had a score of 4.3, the 9% comparative plot had a score of 3.3 and the 11% comparative plot had a score of 2.8, and thus, there was not a difference of a score of 1 in the 7% operation plot as compared with the reference score of 5, and was a difference of a score of 1 or more in all the comparative plots as compared with the reference score of 5. As an average score of the item of powderiness, as compared with the 5% operation plot of the control (reference score of 5), the 7% operation plot had a score of 5.4, the 9% comparative plot had a score of 6.4 and the 11% comparative plot had a score of 7.4, and thus, there was not a difference of a score of 1 in the 7% operation plot as compared with the reference score of 5, and was a difference of a score of 1 or more in all the comparative plots as compared with the reference score of 5. As an average score of the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the 5% operation plot of the control (reference score of 5), the 7% operation plot had a score of 4, the 9% comparative plot had a score of 3 and the 11% comparative plot had a score of 2.3, and thus, there was a difference of a score of just 1 in the 7% operation plot as compared with the reference score of 5, and was a difference of a score of 2 or more in all the comparative plots as compared with the reference score of 5.

[0132] That there was not a difference of a score of 1 in the average score of the 8 panelists from the reference indicates that there was a panelist that determined there was no difference, and hence can be a rough standard indicating the range of equivalence. Therefore, the 5% operation plot of the control and the 7% operation plot were equivalent in the three items of the hardness, the chewy texture and the powderiness, and it is revealed that they were within a range where excellent texture can be obtained. Besides, in the graphs of the items of the chewy texture and the powderiness, an inclination between the 7% operation plot and the 9% comparative plot is larger than an inclination between the 5% operation plot and the 7% operation plot, and an inclination between the 9% comparative plot and the 11% comparative plot. This indicates that the chewy texture is rapidly deteriorated and the powderiness is rapidly increased between the addition percentages of 7% and 9%. These indicate critical significance of defining an addition percentage of 8% as the upper limit value.

Example 8

[0133] <Chilled Boiled Buckwheat Noodles>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of boiled buckwheat noodles in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0134] [Preparation of Boiled Buckwheat Noodle Samples]

[0135] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 35] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. As a powder raw material, a wheat flour and a buckwheat flour (crude protein: 22.4%, ash: 3.0%) mainly ground from an outer layer were mixed with modified starch and vital gluten, so as to improve texture and enforce binding of a dough. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and glycine was dissolved in the kneading water for purposes of improving the preserving property. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 8 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C.

[0136] The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 6 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 1.50 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using mixed cutting teeth having grove widths of 2.1 mm:1.7 mm:1.5 mm=occupied widths of 12:19:21. The thus obtained noodle strings were boiled in hot water for boiling at 98 C. for 1 minute and 10 seconds, then somewhat cooled by putting them in water at 15 C. twice, and dipped in a 0.4% by mass acetic acid solution at 5 C. for 2 minutes and 40 seconds.

[0137] Thereafter, the solution remaining thereon was rapidly removed, 160 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film, subjected to steam sterilization at 85 C. for 30 minutes, and rapidly cooled in a refrigerator at 10 C. to prepare chilled boiled buckwheat noodles having a boiled noodle moisture shown in [Table 35].

TABLE-US-00035 TABLE 35 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Strong Wheat Flour 1932 g 1776 g 1776 g Outer Layer Buckwheat Flour 966 g 966 g 966 g Modified Starch for 96 g 96 g 96 g Buckwheat Noodles Vital Gluten 126 g 126 g 126 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g Total of Powders 3120 g 3120 g 3120 g (Kneading Water) Glycine 35.4 g 35.4 g 35.4 g Fresh Water 996 g 1056 g 1056 g Boiling Time 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec * Boiled Noodle Average 63.0% 65.0% 65.0% Moisture

[0138] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0139] For cooking, each sample was boiled in boiling water for 1 minute. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that boiled buckwheat noodles of the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 5 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00036 TABLE 36 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Powderiness Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Control Evaluator 1 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 3 (reference) No. 2 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 (reference) 3 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 (reference) 2.5 3.0 3 (reference) 4 3 (reference) 2.0 3.0 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 (reference) 5 3 (reference) 4.0 4.0 3 (reference) 4.0 3.0 3 (reference) Average 2.6 3.0 2.7 2.8 Standard 0.89 0.61 0.84 0.27 Deviation T-test against 9.9% 74.9% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Hardness Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator 1 3 (reference) 3.5 3.5 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 No. 2 3 (reference) 4.0 3.5 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 3 (reference) 4.0 3.0 3 (reference) 2.5 2.5 4 3 (reference) 4.0 3.5 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 5 3 (reference) 2.0 2.0 3 (reference) 3.5 3.5 Average 3.5 3.1 2.6 2.8 Standard 0.87 0.65 0.65 0.45 Deviation T-test against 9.9% 17.8% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0140] Results are shown in [Table 36]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had the same score and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a score of a low value of 2.6. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.7 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively increasing from a score of 3.1 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 3.5 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.6 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0141] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0142] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 5 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 160 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 1 minute in boiling water to be served as kake soba with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the buckwheat noodles were able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0143] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 37], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 38], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 39], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 40]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 11.

TABLE-US-00037 TABLE 37 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot Time Elapsed after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 89.5 149.0 146,0 131.0 103.5 94.0 123.0 109.0 110.0 106.0 No. 2 97.0 142.5 98.5 106.0 106.0 107.5 144.5 100.5 110.5 117.5 3 95.5 124.0 101.5 100.5 102.5 90.0 113.0 92.5 105.0 93.0 4 89.5 141.5 113.5 97.0 93.5 88.5 114.0 97.5 96.5 90.5 5 88.0 143.0 98.5 110.0 98.5 89.0 131.0 95.0 95.5 96.5 Average of 91.9 140.0 111.6 10B.9 100.8 93.8 125.1 98.9 103.5 100.7 Subjects T-test against 80 mesh Operation Plot 52% 5% 13% 36% 98% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00038 TABLE 38 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 59.5 56.5 41.5 14.0 29.0 15.0 16.0 12.0 No. 2 45.5 1.5 9.0 9.0 37.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 3 28.5 6.0 5.0 7.0 23.0 2.5 15.0 3.0 4 52.0 24.0 7.5 4.0 25.5 9.0 8.0 2.0 5 55.0 10.5 22.0 10.5 42.0 6.0 6.5 7.5 Average of 48.1 19.7 17.0 8.9 31.3 5.1 9.7 6.9 Subjects T-test against 80 Mesh Operation Plot 3% 11% 30% 8% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00039 TABLE 39 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 59.5 29.0 2 45.5 37.0 3 28.5 23.0 4 52.0 25.5 5 55.0 42.0 Average of Subjects 48.1 31.3 Standard Deviation 12.1 8.0 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 2.8% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00040 TABLE 40 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 4935 1980 2 1815 1140 3 1290 1260 4 2565 1305 5 2783 1748 Average of Subjects 2678 1487 Standard Deviation 1395 359 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 7.1% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0144] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0145] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 91.9 to 93.8 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 48.1 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 31.3 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot, and a significant difference was found by a t-test. Besides, AUC was 2678 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 1487 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot.

[0146] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in Japanese boiled buckwheat noodles by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

Example 9

[0147] <Chilled Boiled Chinese Noodles>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of boiled Chinese noodles in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0148] [Preparation of Boiled Chinese Noodle Samples]

[0149] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 41] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. As a powder raw material, a wheat flour for Chinese noodles was mixed with vital gluten and an egg white powder, so as to enforce binding of a dough and improve texture. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and kansui (an alkaline solution or powder used for Chinese noodles) and a pigment were dissolved in the kneading water in addition to glycine used for purposes of improving the preserving property. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 11 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C. The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 10 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 2.45 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth having a grove width of 1.9 mm.

[0150] The thus obtained noodle strings were boiled in hot water for boiling at 98 C. for 1 minute and 45 seconds, then somewhat cooled by putting them in water at 15 C. twice, and then cooled with ice water at 5 C. for 1 minute and 20 seconds. Thereafter, the solution remaining thereon was rapidly removed, 150 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film, subjected to steam sterilization at 85 C. for 30 minutes, and rapidly cooled in a refrigerator at 10 C. to prepare chilled boiled Chinese noodles having a boiled noodle moisture shown in [Table 41].

TABLE-US-00041 TABLE 41 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour 3000 g 3000 g 3000 g Vital Gluten 90 g 90 g 90 g Egg White Powder 30 g 30 g 30 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g Total of Powders 3120 g 3276 g 3276 g (Kneading Water) Glycine 36 g 36 g 36 g Salt 30 g 30 g 30 g Kansui (Powder) 27 g 27 g 27 g Gardenia Pigment 6 g 6 g 6 g Fresh Water 993 g 1260 g 1260 g Boiling Time 1 min 45 sec 1 min 45 sec 1 min 45 sec * Boiled Noodle Moisture 65.0% 68.0% 68.0%

[0151] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0152] For cooking, each sample was boiled in boiling water for 1 minute. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that boiled Chinese noodles of the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 5 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00042 TABLE 42 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Powderiness Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Control Evaluator 1 3 (reference) 2.5 2.5 3 (reference) 3.5 3.5 3 (reference) No. 2 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 (reference) 1.5 2.0 3 (reference) 3 3 (reference) 2.5 3.0 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 3 (reference) 4 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 3 (reference) 2.0 3.0 3 (reference) 5 3 (reference) 2.0 3.0 3 (reference) 2.0 3.0 3 (reference) Average 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.9 Standard 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.5 Deviation T-test against 9.9% 8.9% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Hardness Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator 1 3 (reference) 3.5 3.0 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 No. 2 3 (reference) 4.0 3.5 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 3 3 (reference) 2.5 2.5 3 (reference) 3.0 3.0 4 3 (reference) 2.5 3.0 3 (reference) 2.0 2.5 5 3 (reference) 3.5 3.0 3 (reference) 2.0 3.0 Average 3.2 3.0 2.4 2.8 Standard 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.3 Deviation T-test against 37.4% 9.9% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0153] Results are shown in [Table 42]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.4 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.9 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.4 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had the same score and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a score of a high value of 3.2. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.4 in the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0154] Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0155] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0156] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 5 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 150 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 1 minute in boiling water to be served as ramen in a soy-sauce flavored soup with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the ramen was able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0157] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 43], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 44], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 45], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 46]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 12.

TABLE-US-00043 TABLE 43 Unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot Time Elapsed after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 99.0 154.0 137.0 133.5 121.5 98.0 145.0 123.0 111.5 115.5 No. 2 92.0 144.0 101.5 116.0 109.0 94.5 124.5 99.5 109.0 99.5 3 98.0 126.5 101.5 115.0 108.0 95.5 116.5 106.0 113.5 107.0 4 98.0 139.5 101.5 106.0 104.0 91.0 123.5 94.5 101.5 105.5 5 99.0 153.0 125.0 119.0 110.5 94.0 141.5 103.5 104.5 108.5 Average of 97.2 143.4 113.3 117.9 110.6 94.6 130.2 105.3 108.0 107.2 Subjects T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 19% 0.3% 15% 6% 16% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00044 TABLE 44 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot Time Elapsed after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 55.0 38.0 34.5 22.5 47.0 25.0 13.5 17.5 No. 2 52.0 9.5 24.0 17.0 30.0 5.0 14.5 5.0 3 28.5 3.5 17.0 10.0 21.0 10.5 18.0 11.5 4 41.5 3.5 8.0 6.0 32.5 3.5 10.5 14.5 5 54.0 26.0 20.0 11.5 47.5 9.5 10.5 14.5 Average of 46.2 16.1 20.7 13.4 35.6 10.7 13.4 12.6 Subjects T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 2% 27% 16% 83% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00045 TABLE 45 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 55.0 47.0 2 52.0 30.0 3 28.5 21.0 4 41.5 32.5 5 54.0 47.5 Average of Subjects 46.2 35.6 Standard Deviation 11.3 11.5 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 2.1% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00046 TABLE 46 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 4163 2828 2 2820 1560 3 1620 1658 4 1680 1613 5 3173 2243 Average of Subjects 2691 1980 Standard Deviation 1070 548 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 7.2% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0158] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0159] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 94.6 to 97.2 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 46.2 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 35.6 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot, and a significant difference was found by a t-test. Besides, AUC was 2691 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 1980 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot.

[0160] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in boiled Chinese noodles by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

Example 10

[0161] <Raw Udon>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of raw udon in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0162] [Preparation of Raw Udon Samples]

[0163] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 47] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. As a powder raw material, a wheat flour was mixed with acetylated tapioca starch, so as to improve texture. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and alcohol and salt were dissolved in the kneading water for purposes of improving the preserving property and noodle making properties. The mixing was performed by kneading under normal pressure of a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 12 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C.

[0164] The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 10 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 2.15 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using mixed cutting teeth having grove widths of 1.9 mm:2.2 mm:2.5 mm=occupied widths of 33:27:19, and 100 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film after powder sprinkling.

TABLE-US-00047 TABLE 47 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour mainly composed of 2813 g 2813 g 2813 g Kitahonami Acetylated Tapioca Starch 187 g 187 g 187 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 150 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 150 g Total of Powders 3000 g 3150 g 3150 g (Kneading Water) Alcohol 150 g 150 g 150 g Salt 84.9 g 113.8 g 113.8 Fresh Water 795 g 1024 g 1024 g

[0165] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0166] For cooking, each sample was boiled in boiling water for 5 minutes and 30 seconds. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 4 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00048 TABLE 48 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3 3.5 3.0 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 2 3 2.0 3.0 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 3 3 2.0 3.0 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 4 3 2.0 3.0 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) Average 2.4 2.8 2.1 2.6 Standard 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 Deviation T-test against 39.1% 5%> Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3 4.5 3.5 3 2.0 3.0 (reference) (reference) 2 3 3.0 3.0 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 3 3 2.5 3.0 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 4 3 4.0 3.0 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) Average 3.5 3.1 2.1 2.8 Standard 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 Deviation T-test against 39.1% 1.5% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0167] Results are shown in [Table 48]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.4 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.6 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.1 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively increasing from a score of 3.1 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 3.5 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.1 in the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0168] Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0169] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0170] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 4 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 100 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 5 minutes and 30 seconds in boiling water to be served as kake udon with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the udon was able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0171] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 49], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 50], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 51], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 52]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 13.

TABLE-US-00049 TABLE 49 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 94.5 143.5 112.5 111.0 114.5 99.0 144.0 112.0 112.0 108.5 No 2 103.5 137.0 132.5 100.5 116.5 102.0 124.5 117.5 109.5 104.5 3 88.0 118.0 108.5 107.0 103.0 91.5 120.5 107.0 100.0 86.5 4 90.5 115.5 88.0 100.0 94.0 97.5 113.5 105.0 104.5 99.0 Average of Subjects 94.1 128.5 110.4 104.6 107.0 97.5 125.6 110.4 106.5 99.6 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 15% 45.2% 100% 62% 21% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00050 TABLE 50 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 49.0 18.0 16.5 20.0 45.0 13.0 13.0 9.5 No. 2 33.5 29.0 3.0 13.0 22.5 15.5 7.5 2.5 3 30.0 20.5 19.0 15.0 29.0 15.5 8.5 5.0 4 25.0 2.5 9.5 3.5 16.0 7.5 7.0 1.5 Average of Subjects 34.4 16.3 10.5 12.9 28.1 12.9 9.0 2.1 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 7% 54% 75% 6% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00051 TABLE 51 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 49.0 45.0 2 33.5 22.5 3 30.0 29.0 4 25.0 16.0 Average of Subjects 34.4 28.1 Standard Deviation 10.4 12.4 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 7.2% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00052 TABLE 52 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 2805 2273 2 1980 1403 3 2310 1515 4 1013 938 Average of Subjects 2027 1532 Standard Deviation 756 553 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 4.7% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0172] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0173] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 4 subjects was 94.1 to 97.5 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 34.4 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 28.1 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot. Besides, AUC was 2027 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 1532 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot, and a significant difference was found by a t-test.

[0174] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in raw udon by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

Example 11

[0175] <Raw Buckwheat Noodles>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of raw buckwheat noodles in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0176] [Preparation of Raw Buckwheat Noodle Samples]

[0177] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 53] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. As a powder raw material, a wheat flour and a buckwheat flour (crude protein: 12.3%, ash: 1.6%) milled with chaff were mixed with vital gluten and an egg white powder, so as to enforce binding of a dough and improve texture. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and an organic acid salt and salt were dissolved in the kneading water for purposes of improving the preserving property. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 12 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C.

[0178] The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 6 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 1.45 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth having a grove width of 1.40 mm, and 100 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film after powder sprinkling.

TABLE-US-00053 TABLE 53 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Strong Wheat Flour 1616 g 1616 g 1616 g Buckwheat Flour milled with Chaff 1385 g 1385 g 1385 g Vital Gluten 150 g 150 g 150 g Egg White Powder 30 g 30 g 30 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 159 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 159 g Total of Powders 3181 g 3340 g 3340 g (Kneading Water) Organic Acid Salt 46.2 g 46.2 g 46.2 g Salt 63.3 g 76.8 g 76.8 g Fresh Water 991 g 1202 g 1202 g

[0179] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0180] For cooking, 100 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled in boiling water for 2 minutes. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 4 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00054 TABLE 54 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3 3.0 3.0 3 3.0 3.0 (reference) (reference) 2 3 3.5 3.0 3 2.5 2.5 (reference) (reference) 3 3 4.0 3.5 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 4 3 2.5 3.0 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) Average 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.8 Standard 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 Deviation T-test against 63.8% 18.2% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3 4.0 3.0 3 3.0 3.5 (reference) (reference) 2 3 3.5 3.0 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 3 3 4.0 3.5 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 4 3 4.0 3.0 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) Average 3.9 3.1 2.5 3.0 Standard 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 Deviation T-test against 1.4% 5%> Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0181] Results are shown in [Table 54]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively increasing from a score of 3.1 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 3.3 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.5 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively increasing from a score of 3.1 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 3.9 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had the same score and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a low score of 2.5.

[0182] Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0183] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0184] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 4 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 100 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 2 minutes in boiling water to be served as kake soba with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the buckwheat noodles were able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0185] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 55], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 56], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 57], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 58]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 14.

TABLE-US-00055 TABLE 55 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 94.0 137.5 115.0 105.0 102.0 97.0 135.0 107.0 112.5 104.5 No 2 100.5 133.0 124.5 103.5 100.5 99.0 126.5 109.5 111.5 99.5 3 93.5 125.0 108.0 104.5 102.0 88.5 122.5 100.0 91.0 92.0 4 94.0 123.5 99.5 96.5 96.0 93.0 116.0 107.0 101.5 100.5 Average of Subjects 95.5 129.8 111.8 102.4 100.1 94.4 125.0 105.9 104.1 99.1 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 54% 3.6% 30% 76% 78% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00056 TABLE 56 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 43.5 21.0 11.0 8.0 38.0 10.0 15.5 7.5 No. 2 32.5 24.0 3.0 0.0 27.5 10.5 12.5 0.5 3 31.5 14.5 11.0 8.5 34.0 11.5 2.5 3.5 4 29.5 5.5 2.5 2.0 23.0 14.0 8.5 7.5 Average of Subjects 34.3 16.3 6.9 4.6 30.6 11.5 9.8 4.8 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 18% 41% 52% 96% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00057 TABLE 57 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 43.5 38.0 2 32.5 27.5 3 31.5 34.0 4 29.5 23.0 Average of Subjects 34.3 30.6 Standard Deviation 6.3 6.7 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 17.7% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00058 TABLE 58 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 2385 2018 2 1785 1523 3 1838 1493 4 1155 1478 Average of Subjects 1791 1628 Standard Deviation 503 261 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 39.2% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0186] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0187] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 4 subjects was 94.4 to 95.5 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 34.3 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was a low value of 30.6 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot. Besides, AUC was 1791 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was a low value of 1628 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot.

[0188] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in raw buckwheat noodles by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

Example 12

[0189] <Raw Pasta>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of raw pasta in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0190] [Preparation of Raw Pasta Samples]

[0191] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 59] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and salt and a pigment were dissolved in the kneading water in addition to alcohol used for purposes of improving the preserving property. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 12 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C.

[0192] The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 8 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 1.95 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth having a grove width of 1.50 mm, and 100 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film after powder sprinkling.

TABLE-US-00059 TABLE 59 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) All Purpose Flour 3000 g 3000 g 3000 g Egg Yolk Powder 90 g 90 g 90 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g Total of Powders 3090 g 3246 g 3246 g (Kneading Water) Alcohol 150 g 150 g 150 g Pigment 0.75 g 0.75 g 0.75 g Salt 83.3 g 109 g 109 g Fresh Water 750 g 981 g 981 g

[0193] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0194] For cooking, each sample was boiled in boiling water for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that raw pasta of the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 4 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00060 TABLE 60 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 2.0 2.0 (reference) (reference) 2 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 (reference) (reference) 3 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 (reference) (reference) Average 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.9 Standard 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 Deviation T-test against 5.8% 39.1% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 (reference) (reference) 2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 (reference) (reference) 3 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 4 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 (reference) (reference) Average 3.3 3.1 2.9 3.0 Standard 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 Deviation T-test against 39.1% 39.1% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0195] Results are shown in [Table 60]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.9 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.5 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.9 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.8 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively increasing from a score of 3.1 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 3.3 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had the same score and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a score of a low value of 2.9.

[0196] Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0197] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0198] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 4 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 100 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 2 minutes and 30 seconds in boiling water to be served after being dressed with 15 g of a commercially available pasta seasoning with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the pasta was able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0199] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 61], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 62], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 63], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 64]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 15.

TABLE-US-00061 TABLE 61 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 95.0 138.0 101.5 107.5 119.5 91.5 115.5 110.5 109.5 105.5 No 2 104.0 129.0 124.0 119.0 117.5 106.5 122.0 122.0 116.5 112.0 3 87.0 109.5 126.5 112.5 95.5 84.5 104.5 100.5 93.0 90.5 4 89.5 117.0 96.5 92.5 97.0 95.0 105.5 100.5 111.0 108.5 Average of Subjects 93.9 123.4 112.1 107.9 107.4 94.4 111.9 108.4 107.5 104.1 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 83% 6.0% 66% 96% 59% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00062 TABLE 62 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 43.0 6.5 12.5 24.5 24.0 19.0 18.0 14.0 No. 2 25.0 20.0 15.0 13.5 15.5 15.5 10.0 5.5 3 22.5 39.5 25.5 8.5 20.0 16.0 8.5 6.0 4 27.5 7.0 3.0 7.5 10.5 5.5 16.0 13.5 Average of Subjects 29.5 18.3 14.0 13.5 17.5 14.0 13.1 9.8 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 5% 61% 90% 38% according to t distribution)

TABLE-US-00063 TABLE 63 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 43.0 24.0 2 25.0 15.5 3 39.5 20.0 4 27.5 16.0 Average of Subjects 33.8 18.9 Standard Deviation 8.8 4.0 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 1.0% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00064 TABLE 64 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 2228 2040 2 2003 1313 3 2753 1425 4 1238 1163 Average of Subjects 2055 1485 Standard Deviation 629 385 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 14.0% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0200] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0201] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 4 subjects was 93.9 to 94.4 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 33.8 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 18.9 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot, and a significant difference was found by a t-test.

[0202] Besides, AUC was 2055 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 1485 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot.

[0203] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in raw pasta by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

Example 13

[0204] <Raw Chinese Noodles>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of raw Chinese noodles in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0205] [Preparation of Raw Chinese Noodle Samples]

[0206] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 65] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. As a powder raw material, a wheat flour for Chinese noodles was mixed with vital gluten, so as to improve texture and enforce binding of a dough. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and kansui, salt and a pigment were dissolved in the kneading water in addition to alcohol used for purposes of improving the preserving property. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 80 kPa for 12 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C.

[0207] The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 6 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 1.5 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth having a grove width of 1.4 mm, and 100 g thereof corresponding to each serving was sealed with a polyethylene film after powder sprinkling.

TABLE-US-00065 TABLE 65 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Wheat Flour 3000 g 3000 g 3000 g Vital Gluten 90 g 90 g 90 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 156 g Total of Powders 3090 g 3246 g 3246 g (Kneading Water) Alcohol 135 g 135 g 135 g Kansui (Powder) 30.3 g 30.3 g 30.3 g Salt 54 g 54 g 54 g Gardenia Pigment 2.7 g 2.7 g 2.7 g Fresh Water 780 g 1020 g 1020 g

[0208] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0209] For cooking, each sample was boiled in boiling water for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 4 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00066 TABLE 66 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3 2.0 2.0 3 3.5 3.5 (reference) (reference) 2 3 2.5 2.5 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 3 3 2.0 2.5 3 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 4 3 2.0 2.5 3 1.5 2.5 (reference) (reference) Average 2.1 2.4 2.5 3.0 Standard 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.4 Deviation T-test against 18.2% 9.2% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3 3.0 3.0 3 2.5 2.5 (reference) (reference) 2 3 4.0 3.5 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 3 3 4.0 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 (reference) (reference) 4 3 2.5 2.5 3 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) Average 3.4 3.1 2.3 2.5 Standard 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.0 Deviation T-test against 18.2% 18.2% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0210] Results are shown in [Table 66]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.4 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.1 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had the same score and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a score of a low value of 2.5. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively increasing from a score of 3.1 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 3.4 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.5 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.3 in the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0211] Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0212] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0213] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 4 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes.

[0214] For cooking, 100 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 2 minutes and 30 seconds in boiling water to be served as ramen in a soy-sauce flavored soup with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the ramen was able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0215] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 67], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 68], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 69], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 70]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 16.

TABLE-US-00067 TABLE 67 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 mm Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 mm Subject 1 90.5 165.5 121.0 107.0 114.5 88.0 137.0 104.0 104.0 101.5 No. 2 97.5 139.5 113.5 115.5 103.5 100.5 128.5 113.0 110.5 107.0 3 79.0 112.5 97.5 101.5 89.5 86.0 122.0 114.0 96.5 106.5 4 89.5 126.0 97.0 100.5 104.5 98.0 131.5 98.0 106.5 104.5 Average of Subjects 89.1 135.9 108.0 106.1 103.0 93.1 129.8 107.3 104.4 104.9 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 20% 53.1% 93% 55% 78% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00068 TABLE 68 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 75.0 33.5 16.5 24.0 49.0 16.0 16.0 13.5 No. 2 42.0 16.0 18.0 6.0 28.0 12.5 10.0 6.5 3 33.5 18.5 22.5 10.5 36.0 28.0 10.5 20.5 4 36.5 7.5 11.0 15.0 33.5 0.0 8.5 6.5 Average of Subjects 46.8 18.9 17.0 13.9 36.6 14.1 11.3 11.8 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 21% 46% 12% 68% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00069 TABLE 69 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 75.0 49.0 2 42.0 28.0 3 33.5 36.0 4 36.5 33.5 Average of Subjects 46.8 36.6 Standard Deviation 19.2 8.9 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 20.7% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00070 TABLE 70 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 4110 2633 2 2370 1613 3 2393 2543 4 1875 1358 Average of Subjects 2687 2036 Standard Deviation 978 646 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 14.8% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0216] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0217] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 4 subjects was 89.1 to 93.1 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 46.8 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was a low value of 36.6 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot. Besides, AUC was 2687 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was a low value of 2036 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot.

[0218] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in raw Chinese noodles by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

Example 14

[0219] <Frozen Boiled Pasta>: The effect of suppressing the postprandial blood glucose level increase of boiled pasta in which Ca alginate was added was checked, and sensory evaluation was performed to compare 270 mesh pass and 80 mesh pass.

[0220] [Preparation of Boiled Pasta Samples]

[0221] Powder raw materials shown in [Table 71] were respectively homogeneously mixed, and kneading water was respectively added thereto, followed by mixing. Ca alginate was added in a comparative plot and an operation plot, and a salt solution was used as the kneading water for purposes of improving the noodle making properties. The mixing was performed by kneading at a decompression degree of 90 kPa for 8 minutes to obtain a kneaded dough in a crumbled state at a temperature of 28 to 34 C. The kneaded dough was formed into crude noodle belts each having a thickness of 9 mm using a noodle belt forming roll to be compounded with the thickness kept, the resultant was allowed to stand at 25 C. for 60 minutes under a condition where it was not dried, was rolled into a thickness of 2.15 mm using a four-stage flat roll, and then finely cut into noodle strings using cutting teeth having a grove width of 1.9 mm.

[0222] The thus obtained noodle strings were boiled in hot water for boiling at 98 C. for 1 minute, then somewhat cooled by putting them in water at 15 C. twice, and then cooled with ice water at 5 C. for 1 minute. Thereafter, the solution remaining thereon was rapidly removed, 150 g thereof corresponding to each serving was put in a forming tray for freezing, and was quick-frozen at 36 C. for 40 minutes to prepare frozen boiled pasta having a boiled noodle moisture shown in [Table 71].

TABLE-US-00071 TABLE 71 Sample Type 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Item Control Plot Plot (Powder Raw Materials) Durum Wheat Flour 2571 g 2571 g 2571 g Acetylated Tapioca Starch 429 g 429 g 429 g 80 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 150 g 270 Mesh Pass Ca Alginate 150 g Total of Powders 3000 g 3150 g 3150 g (Kneading Water) Salt 68.7 g 68.7 g 68.7 g Fresh Water 1182 g 1440 g 1440 g Boiling Time 1 min 1 min 1 min * Boiled Noodle Average 62.5% 64.7% 64.7% Moisture

[0223] [Sensory Evaluation Test]

[0224] For cooking, each sample was boiled in boiling water for 20 to 30 seconds. Sensory evaluation was performed on a 80 mesh comparative plot and a 270 mesh operation plot by using a control plot as a reference. By employing a 5-point rating scale assuming that boiled pasta of the control plot had a score of 3, the four items of hardness (hard: 5 to soft: 1), viscoelasticity (viscoelastic: 5 to brittle: 1), powderiness (powdery: 5 to not powdery: 1), and comprehensive texture (preferable: 5 to not preferable: 1) were evaluated, and an average of scores of 5 specialized panelists was employed.

TABLE-US-00072 TABLE 72 Hardness Viscoelasticity 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 (reference) (reference) 2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 3 3.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 4 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 (reference) (reference) 5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 5.0 4.0 (reference) (reference) Average 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.2 Standard 0.6 2.4 1.2 0.6 Deviation T-test against 37.4% 100.0% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution) Powderiness Comprehensive Texture 80 Mesh 270 Mesh 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Comparative Operation Comparative Operation Control Plot Plot Control Plot Plot Evaluator No. 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 (reference) (reference) 2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 (reference) (reference) 3 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.5 (reference) (reference) 4 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 (reference) (reference) 5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 (reference) (reference) Average 3.2 3.1 2.8 3.0 Standard 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 Deviation T-test against 37.4% 17.8% Comparative Plot (Probability according to t- distribution)

[0225] Results are shown in [Table 72]. As a result, in the item of hardness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, there was a tendency of successively lowering from a score of 2.8 in the 270 mesh operation plot to a score of 2.7 in the 80 mesh comparative plot. In the item of viscoelasticity, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot and the 80 mesh comparative plot had the same score of 3.2. In the item of powderiness, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had a score of 3.1 and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a score of a high value of 3.2. In the item of comprehensive texture, as compared with the reference score of 3 of the control plot, the 270 mesh operation plot had the same score and the 80 mesh comparative plot had a score of a low value of 2.8.

[0226] Based on these results, the 270 mesh operation plot had the scores closer to those of the control plot in almost all the items than the 80 mesh comparative plot.

[0227] [Measurement Method for Blood Glucose Level]

[0228] For the measurement of the blood glucose level, comparison was made between the 80 mesh comparative plot and the 270 mesh operation plot with the control plot excluded. The measurement of the blood glucose level was performed in Shimadaya Corporation, and subjects were 5 healthy males and females over 20 years old including a person having a fasting blood glucose level corresponding to borderline diabetes. For cooking, 150 g corresponding to each serving of each sample was boiled for 20 to 30 seconds in boiling water to be served after being dressed with 15 g of a commercially available pasta seasoning with no ingredients. Conditions were adjusted so that the pasta was able to be finished in 5 minutes after serving, and the blood glucose level was measured 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after starting the ingestion.

[0229] The thus obtained blood glucose level is shown in [Table 73], a change in the blood glucose level is shown in [Table 74], a difference (C.sub.max) between a maximum blood glucose level and preprandial blood glucose level is shown in [Table 75], and a product (AUC) of the blood glucose level and the time calculated using the preprandial blood glucose level as a baseline is shown in [Table 76]. Besides, transition of an average of the blood glucose levels is illustrated in a graph of FIG. 17.

TABLE-US-00073 TABLE 73 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 mm Prior 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 mm Subject 1 96.0 134.0 107.5 107.0 109.0 96.0 117.5 107.0 102.0 103.5 No 2 89.5 117.0 98.5 102.0 118.5 97.5 116.5 97.0 98.5 106.5 3 91.5 123.5 99.5 102.5 104.0 94.5 124.5 93.5 100.5 100.0 4 91.0 131.0 109.5 104.5 102.5 98.5 126.0 119.0 99.5 109.0 5 87.5 123.5 102.5 111.0 100.5 91.0 124.5 101.0 106.5 106.5 Average of Subjects 91.1 125.8 103.5 105.4 106.9 95.5 121.8 103.5 101.4 105.1 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 4% 29.4% 100% 0% 64% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00074 TABLE 74 unit: mg/dl Time Elapsed 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 270 Mesh Operation Plot after Ingestion 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Subject 1 38.0 11.5 11.0 13.0 21.5 11.0 6.0 7.5 No. 2 27.5 9.0 12.5 29.0 19.0 0.5 1.0 9.0 3 32.0 8.0 11.0 12.5 30.0 1.0 6.0 5.5 4 40.0 18.5 13.5 11.5 27.5 20.5 1.0 10.5 5 36.0 15.0 23.5 13.0 33.5 10.0 15.5 15.5 Average of Subjects 34.7 12.4 14.3 15.8 26.3 8.0 5.9 9.6 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot (Probability 4% 13% 1% 18% according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00075 TABLE 75 unit: mg/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh Cmax Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 38.0 21.5 2 29.0 19.0 3 32.0 30.0 4 40.0 27.5 5 36.0 33.5 Average of Subjects 35.0 26.3 Standard Deviation 4.5 6.0 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 3.7% (Probability according to t-distribution)

TABLE-US-00076 TABLE 76 unit: mg .Math. min/dl 80 Mesh 270 Mesh AUC Comparative Plot Operation Plot Subject No. 1 2010 1268 2 1905 720 3 1718 1133 4 2333 1628 5 2430 2003 Average of Subjects 2079 1350 Standard Deviation 297 488 T-test against 80 Mesh Comparative Plot 0.5% (Probability according to t-distribution)

[0230] [Measurement Results of Blood Glucose Level]

[0231] An average of the preprandial blood glucose levels of the 5 subjects was 91.1 to 95.5 mg/dl, C.sub.max was 35.0 mg/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 26.3 mg/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot, and a significant difference was found by a t-test. Besides, AUC was 2079 mg.Math.min/dl in the 80 mesh comparative plot, but was an obviously low value of 1350 mg.Math.min/dl in the 270 mesh operation plot, and a significant difference was found by a t-test.

[0232] In other words, it was confirmed that the effect of suppressing the blood glucose level increase can be obtained also in frozen boiled pasta by using calcium alginate pulverized to 270 mesh pass as compared with that of 80 mesh pass.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0233] The present invention provides good-texture healthy boiled noodles retaining original texture of noodles having a health function of calcium alginate such as an effect of suppressing postprandial blood glucose level increase effectively retained, and in addition, without causing, in production of the noodles, deterioration of viscoelasticity and the like of noodle tissue and deterioration of texture otherwise caused in adding calcium alginate. When the method of the present invention is applied to production of boiled udon, boiled udon in which calcium alginate does not elute during a boiling step so that viscosity increase of hot water used for boiling can be restrained, in which deterioration of texture corresponding to a characteristic of udon, such as softness and chewy texture, can be prevented, and with which rapid increase of postprandial blood glucose level can be suppressed is provided.