Method of stripping films which are stuck together without damage

Abstract

A method of stripping films which are stuck together without damage is disclosed. The whole reel of films which are stuck together is placed in a sealing device with outlet valves. Liquid nitrogen is added at a bottom of the sealing device. The films are stripped off by a flow of gas through gaps between the layers of the films while the vaporization of liquid nitrogen. The present invention adopts a natural force of liquid nitrogen vaporization to strip the films, which does not compromise the PH value, the dimensional performance and the mechanical performance of the films. The films are stripped off without damage. The conventional method of stripping the films causes the fragile film to break off or the image layer with a decreased combing power to detach. The present invention has the advantages of simple operation, low cost and good promotion value.

Claims

1. A method of stripping films which are stuck together without damage, comprising steps of adding liquid nitrogen into a sealing device with safety valves; hanging the films which are stuck together inside the sealing device horizontally; setting the safety valves to automatically discharge gas when a pressure inside the sealing device reaches 0.10-0.50 MPa; vaporizing the liquid nitrogen added in the sealing device for 30 to 150 minutes; taking out the films when a temperature returns to a room temperature; completing stripping of the films.

2. The method of stripping the films which are stuck together without the damage, as recited in claim 1, wherein the safety valves automatically discharge the gas when the pressure inside the sealing device reaches 0.15-0.20 MPa.

3. The method of stripping the films which are stuck together without the damage, as recited in claim 1, wherein a distance between a bottom of the films which are stuck together and an initial liquid nitrogen surface is 0.5-2 cm.

4. The method of stripping the films which are stuck together without the damage, as recited in claim 2, wherein a distance between a bottom of the films which are stuck together and an initial liquid nitrogen surface is 0.5-2 cm.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

(1) Referring to the drawings, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. The embodiments are not a limitation for the present invention.

Embodiment 1

(2) The liquid nitrogen is added into the sealing device with safety valves on the top lid. The sealing device is a stainless steel barrel with a diameter of 15 cm and a capacity of 1.5 L. The liquid nitrogen reaches a height of 5 cm. The bonded cellulose acetate films are hung is in the sealing device horizontally. The distance between the bottom of the films and the initial liquid surface of the liquid nitrogen is 1 cm. The safety valves automatically discharge gases when the pressure inside the sealing device reaches 0.17 MPa. The films are taken out when the liquid nitrogen fully vaporized (about 50 minutes) and a temperature returns to a room temperature. The films are successfully stripped and the stripped films are spread freely.

Embodiment 2

(3) The liquid nitrogen is added into the sealing device with safety valves on the top lid. The sealing device is a stainless steel barrel with a diameter of 35 cm and a capacity of 15 L. The liquid nitrogen reaches a height of 5 cm. The bonded cellulose acetate films are hung in the sealing device horizontally. The distance between the bottom of the films and the initial liquid surface of the liquid nitrogen is 0.5 cm. The safety valves automatically discharge gases when the pressure inside the sealing device reaches 0.10 MPa. The films are taken out when the liquid nitrogen fully vaporized (about 30 minutes) and a temperature returns to a room temperature. The films are successfully stripped.

Embodiment 3

(4) The liquid nitrogen is added into the sealing device with safety valves on the top lid. The sealing device is a stainless steel barrel with a diameter of 35 cm and a capacity of 15 L. The liquid nitrogen reaches a height of 8 cm. The bonded cellulose acetate films are hung in the sealing device horizontally. The distance between the bottom of the films and the initial liquid surface of the liquid nitrogen is 1 cm. The safety valves automatically discharge gases when the pressure inside the sealing device reaches 0.20 MPa. The films are taken out when the liquid nitrogen fully vaporized (about 40 minutes) and a temperature returns to a room temperature. The films are successfully stripped.

Embodiment 4

(5) The liquid nitrogen is added into the sealing device with safety valves on the top lid. The sealing device is a stainless steel barrel with a diameter of 35 cm and a capacity of 15 L. The liquid nitrogen reaches a height of 10 cm. The bonded cellulose acetate films are hung in the sealing device horizontally. The distance between the bottom of the films and the initial liquid surface of the liquid nitrogen is 2 cm. The safety valves automatically discharge gases when the pressure inside the sealing device reaches 0.50 MPa. The films are taken out when the liquid nitrogen fully vaporized (about 60 minutes) and a temperature returns to a room temperature. The films are successfully stripped.

(6) In order to illustrate the benefits of the present invention, the inventor test the film properties with different processing time by adopting the method described in the embodiment 1.

(7) 1 the Difference in the pH Value.

(8) The pH value is tested by adopting the film acidity testing method developed by the Manchester industrial school and the Eastman Kodak company. The test comprises the following steps: a) weighing 1 g of the sample film with an accuracy of 0.01 g; b) cutting the sample film with the emulsion layer and all the coating layers to small blocks of 25 mm and putting the small blocks into 100 ml of deionized water; c) soaking the film in water of 38 degrees and stirring continuously for 24 hours; d) filtering the solution and removing the film granules (especially the emulsion granules, because the gelatin is amphoteric and affects the test result); e) testing the sample film with a pH meter; wherein the relative pH accuracy of the pH meter is +/0.01; averaging the results after the parallel determination of three samples for the same film. The test results are shown in the table 1.

(9) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 the difference in pH value before and after the processing Processing time/min Processing sequence 0 30 60 90 120 150 1 4.00 4.05 3.98 3.97 3.99 4.03 2 4.14 3.96 4.03 3.92 4.10 4.11 3 3.96 4.08 4.08 4.10 4.08 3.98 Average value 4.03 4.03 4.03 4.00 4.06 4.04

(10) As illustrated in the table 1, with an increasing in the processing time, the pH value of the film before and after the processing is basically unchanged, which proves that the processing time does not affect the acidity of the films

(11) 2 the Difference in the Dimensional Stability of the Film.

(12) The moisture content of the film is for a measurement of the water and the volatile component in the film and the film base, which is also an indicator for the dimensional stability of the film. The present test adopts a standard method for determining the moisture content of the film listed in Chinese industry standard HG/T 3558-1988. The method comprises the following steps: taking a sample film about 1 g; placing the sample film inside a weighing bottle which is pre-dried to a constant weight; putting the lid on the weighing bottle; weighing with an analytical balance; opening the lid and drying the film inside a constant-temperature dry box of 70 degrees for 3 hours; putting the lid on and placing the weighing bottle inside a drier before weighing again. The formula is as below:
moisture content %=(weight of the sample film before dried-weight of the sample film after dried)*100/weight of the sample film before dried

(13) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 dimensional stability after processing Processing Processing time/min item 30 60 90 120 150 Weight of sample 1.0750 1.0866 1.0434 1.1876 1.0966 film before dried(g) Weight of sample 1.0664 1.0776 1.0342 1.1775 1.0873 film after dried(g) m(g) 0.0086 0.0090 0.0092 0.0101 0.0093 moisture content 0.80 0.83 0.88 0.85 0.83 (%)

(14) As illustrated in the table 2, with an increasing in the processing time, the moisture content of the film before and after the processing is basically unchanged, which proves that the processing time does not affect the dimensional stability of the films. The moisture content refers to the water and volatile component content, which is an indicator for the dimensional stability of the film base in production.

(15) 3 the Difference in the Mechanical Stress of the Film.

(16) The difference in the mechanical stress of the film is indicated by the tensile strength and the folding endurance of the film.

(17) The test for the folding endurance comprises the following steps: cutting the sample film into strips 150 mm*15 mm; preparing for at least 15 strips; setting the tension of the folding tester which is controlled be a computer to 4.9N; testing the folding endurance; recording the number of the double fold; testing 10 strips for each sample group; averaging the test results. The tests results are listed in the table 3.

(18) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 the difference in the folding endurance before and after the processing Processing time/min Processing sequence 0 30 60 90 120 150 1 1.08 1.08 1 1 0.95 0.9 2 0.95 1.1 1.11 0.95 1.11 1.1 3 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.00 1.08 4 1.04 0.95 0.9 1.11 1.00 0.95 5 0.95 0.9 1.08 1.11 1.04 0.9 6 1.00 1 0.95 1.04 1.00 1.11 7 0.95 1 0.96 0.9 0.95 1 8 1.00 0.95 1.08 1 1.11 0.95 9 1.00 1.08 1 1.11 1.15 1.08 10 1.00 1 1.04 1 1.00 1.11 Average value 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.02

(19) The test for the tensile strength comprises the following steps: cutting the sample film into strips 150 mm*15 mm; preparing for at least 15 strips; testing the tensile stress of the samples by a pendulum tensile strength tester; testing 10 strips for each sample group; averaging the test results and calculating the tensile strength with the below formula:

(20) $S=\frac{F}{L_w}$

(21) wherein S denotes the tensile strength, kN/m; F denotes the tensile stress, N; L.sub.w denotes the width of the sample, mm. The test results are illustrated in the table 4.

(22) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 difference in the tensile strength of the film before and after the processing Processing time/min Processing sequence 0 30 60 90 120 150 1 78.0 78.2 77.8 77.8 83.4 75.8 2 79.6 78.4 78.4 80.4 82.6 80.4 3 82.4 81.6 85.6 82 80.1 78.9 4 80.2 83.0 77.4 79 82 80.2 5 77.0 78.4 76.8 78.4 75 85.8 6 80.9 78.4 77.8 76.8 78.4 82.6 7 81.1 83.8 80.5 80.3 77 79.4 8 80.0 77.8 84.5 86.6 82 76.4 9 78.9 79.0 86 80.8 82.2 83.6 10 82.3 80.8 78.4 78.8 78.6 84.4 Average value 80.0 79.9 80.3 80.1 80.1 80.7

(23) As illustrated in the table 3 and table 4, with an increasing in the processing time, the folding endurance and the tensile strength of the film before and after the processing is basically unchanged, which proves that the processing time does not affect the dimensional stability of the films.

(24) The inventor test the cellulose acetate films made in China during 1980s. A reel of films is processed by parallel determination for 150 minutes. The research shows the liquid nitrogen does not compromise the pH value, the dimensional stability and the mechanical stress of the films. The liquid nitrogen is able to strip the bonded films without damage.