SHEET MATERIAL PRESS FORMING METHOD

Abstract

Provided is a sheet material press forming method of press forming a formed part including a top portion with a protrusion having a blockage protrusive shape, the method including: preforming a high-strength steel sheet; and then forming it into a target shape without fractures or wrinkles, which is achieved by determining a shape in the preforming by press forming analysis according to the following steps: S1: the region of the protrusion having the target shape is discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes for finite element analysis; and S2: the discretized portion are applied with internal stress in the normal directions of the two-dimensional elements from the inside of the discretized portion and deformed under the following conditions: (a) the two-dimensional elements are deformed within an elastic deformation range; and (b) adjacent ones of the two-dimensional elements have an angle therebetween which is free to change.

Claims

1. A sheet material press forming method of press forming a formed part having a hat-like cross-sectional shape and including a top portion, a side wall portion, and a flange portion, the top portion having a protrusion with a blockage protrusive shape, from a metal blank, the method comprising: first, for the top portion in a region of the protrusion, determining, by press forming analysis, a preforming shape which has almost the same surface area as a target shape and is easy to form according to the following steps S1 and S2; and then, press forming the metal blank into the preforming shape, and subsequently crash forming a pertinent portion of the metal blank into a target final shape, where S1: the region of the protrusion having the target shape is discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes for finite element analysis, and S2: a discretized portion is applied with internal stress in the normal directions of the two-dimensional elements from the inside of the discretized portion and deformed under the following conditions: (a) the two-dimensional elements are deformed within an elastic deformation range; and (b) adjacent ones of the two-dimensional elements have an angle therebetween which is free to change.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] In the accompanying drawings:

[0022] FIG. 1 illustrates a formed part including a top portion having a protrusion with a blockage protrusive shape;

[0023] FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram indicating the concept of this disclosure and illustrates one example of target shapes of the protrusion;

[0024] FIG. 2B illustrates a state in which the protrusion is discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes;

[0025] FIG. 2C illustrates a preformed shape of the protrusion;

[0026] FIG. 3A illustrates a state in which a surrounding portion of the projection is discretized;

[0027] FIG. 3B is an enlarged view of an essential part of FIG. 3A;

[0028] FIG. 4A illustrates the shape of a preformed shape after the discretized portion is applied with internal pressure;

[0029] FIG. 4B illustrates a target shape of the discretized portion;

[0030] FIG. 5A illustrates a comparative method including a first step of shallow draw forming and a second step of bending deformation with pad;

[0031] FIG. 5B illustrates a position at which the pad is held in FIG. 5A;

[0032] FIG. 6 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio when a conventional method 1 is used for forming;

[0033] FIG. 7 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio during shallow draw forming (first step) in a comparative method 1;

[0034] FIG. 8 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio during bending deformation with pad (second step) in the comparative method 1;

[0035] FIG. 9 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio when a preformed shape is formed according to a disclosed method 1;

[0036] FIG. 10 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio when a target shape is formed according to the disclosed method 1;

[0037] FIG. 11 illustrates the shape of a part to be used in Example 2;

[0038] FIG. 12 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio when the part to be used in Example 2 is formed according to a conventional method 2;

[0039] FIG. 13 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio of the part to be formed in Example 2 during shallow draw forming (first step) in a comparative method 2;

[0040] FIG. 14 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio of the part to be formed in Example 2 during bending deformation with pad (second step) in the comparative method 2;

[0041] FIG. 15A illustrates a state in which a surrounding portion of a fracture risk portion of the part used in Example 2 is discretized;

[0042] FIG. 15B is an enlarged view of an essential part of FIG. 15A;

[0043] FIG. 16A illustrates the shape of the preformed shape after the discretized portion is applied with internal pressure;

[0044] FIG. 16B illustrates a target shape of the discretized portion;

[0045] FIG. 17 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio when a preformed shape is formed according to a disclosed method 2; and

[0046] FIG. 18 illustrates a thickness reduction ratio when a target shape is formed according to the disclosed method 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0047] The following describes the present disclosure in detail.

[0048] For example, as illustrated in FIG. 1, even if a formed part 10 having a hat-like cross-sectional shape and including a top portion 11, a side wall portion 12, and a flange portion 13, the top portion 11 having a protrusion 14 having a protrusive shape with a closed periphery, that is, a blockage protrusive shape is formed in a single step using a tool of press forming, when a target shape is complicated and a used metallic sheet has low ductility, a fracture occurs near the protrusion and a product having a target shape cannot be obtained.

[0049] In order to solve this problem, a method of dividing the press forming process into a plurality of steps is sometimes used. That is, press forming is performed to form a rough shape in a preforming step and press forming is performed again (restrike) in the subsequent step to obtain a target shape. At that time, a shape formed in the preforming step (hereinafter, referred to as preformed shape) has been conventionally designed depending on design expert's experience and know-how.

[0050] Recently, a design has been made based on the idea of taking, in a preformed shape, product cross sections including fracture regions in a grid pattern or radially from the centroid, deforming the preformed shape, keeping the cross-sectional line lengths of the cross sections in a suitable range to thereby suppress the elongation and contraction of a metallic sheet in the restrike step, which makes it possible to obtain a product without fractures or wrinkles (for example, PTL 2).

[0051] However, the metallic sheet during restrike is rarely deformed in the cross sections in a grid-like form or taken radially from the centroid. Typically, the metallic sheet moves three dimensionally in arbitrarily directions almost across the entire region. Therefore, only with the idea of matching the cross-sectional line lengths described in PTL 2, failures such as fractures and wrinkles often occur during the restrike, and trials and errors need to be repeated to determine the shape of the preformed shape. In the worst case, an optimal shape of the preformed shape may not be determined.

[0052] Therefore, to deal with three-dimensional deformation of the metallic sheet which cannot be dealt with relying on the idea of using the cross-sectional line length, the inventors conceived of determining an optimal preformed shape by using a three-dimensional finite element method as press forming analysis.

[0053] The following describes the concept of this disclosure based on FIGS. 2A to 2C.

[0054] FIG. 2A illustrates one example of the target shape of the protrusion. Although FIGS. 2A to 2C illustrate a two-dimensional cross section to illustrate clearly, it is necessary to consider a three-dimensional shape in practice.

[0055] Then, protrusion regions 1 to 8 to form the target shape are discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes (making a mesh) as illustrated in FIG. 2B. It is preferable to make the distance between adjacent ones of the nodes indicated by Nos. 1 to 8 as equal as possible.

[0056] Then, using the finite element method, a rough preformed shape which makes forming of a final shape easy in the subsequent step is determined (FIG. 2C). At that time, it is preferable that the sides connected by the nodes bend freely and that the determined rough preformed shape has approximately the same surface area as the target shape.

[0057] Specifically, internal stress is applied to the discretized portion from the inside in normal directions of the two-dimensional elements (also referred to as shell elements) to determine the preformed shape. Important points are (a) the two-dimensional elements should be deformed within an elastic deformation range and (b) an angle between adjacent ones of the the two-dimensional elements should be free to change.

[0058] Thus, the rough preformed shape is determined as illustrated in FIG. 2C.

[0059] Next, in actual press forming, a tool of press forming having the preformed shape determined as described above (FIG. 2C) is made, and a blank is formed into the preformed shape and subsequently formed into the target shape (FIG. 2A) by restrike.

[0060] Next, specific procedures using the above method will be described.

[0061] First, a connection ridge portion between the top portion 11 and the side wall portion 12, including a portion where fractures or wrinkles may occur in the target shape illustrated in FIG. 1, is discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes, adjacent nodes are connected by a line segment, and a region surrounded by the line segments is determined as a two-dimensional element (making a mesh). This schematic diagram is illustrated in FIG. 3A. FIG. 3B is an enlarged view of an essential part. At that time, the distance between discretized nodes is not particularly limited, but it is preferably set to about 50% to 300% of the sheet thickness.

[0062] Next, finite element analysis in which the two-dimensional elements constituting the discretized portion are applied with internal pressure from the inside of the discretized portion in normal directions of the two-dimensional elements for deformation is performed. At that time, the analysis is performed under conditions that the two-dimensional elements are deformed within the elastic deformation range and an angle between adjacent two-dimensional elements are free to change.

[0063] Thus, the shape of the preformed shape which is easy to form since the shape is rougher than the target shape and has the same surface area as the target shape can be readily obtained. One example of the shape of the preformed shape thus obtained is illustrated in FIG. 4A. FIG. 4A illustrates the shape of the preformed shape after the application of internal pressure and FIG. 4B illustrates the target shape.

[0064] The preformed shape thus obtained has a rougher shape than the target shape and can avoid local deformation and stress concentration, and thus, it is free from fractures or wrinkles. Further, when the preformed shape is crash formed into the target shape, bending deformation is only applied to the two-dimensional elements and nodes in the crash forming, and thus the two-dimensional elements are less easily deformed. Accordingly, the preformed shape can be obtained without fractures or wrinkles, and when the preformed shape is press formed into the target shape, additional elongation or contraction will not occur. Thus, the target shape can be eventually obtained without fractures or wrinkles.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

[0065] A part having a shape illustrated in FIG. 1 was manufactured by press forming. The metallic sheet of the part was a steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1180 MPa and a sheet thickness of 1.2 mm.

[0066] A method having only one step of draw forming was used as a conventional method (conventional method 1).

[0067] A method having a first step of shallow draw forming and a second step of crash forming with pad as illustrated in FIG. 5A was used as a comparative method (comparative method 1). FIG. 5A illustrates a formed shape and FIG. 5B illustrates a position at which the pad is held.

[0068] The disclosed method had a first step of draw forming and a second step of crash forming (disclosed method 1).

[0069] First, a forming result of the conventional method 1 is illustrated in FIG. 6. As illustrated in FIG. 6, using the conventional method 1, a large local thickness reduction occurred, which might lead to fraction.

[0070] Further, using the comparative method 1, a result of shallow draw forming of the preformed shape is illustrated in FIG. 7 and a result of subjecting the preformed shape to crash forming with pad to obtain a target shape is illustrated in FIG. 8. When the comparative method 1 was used, local thickness reduction occurred during the draw forming as the first step and the crash forming with pad as the second step and there was a concern that a fracture might occur from this portion.

[0071] Next, in performing the disclosed method 1, the preformed shape was subjected to press forming analysis by the finite element method. As illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, a part of the side wall portion and the top portion were discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes. In the discretization, the interval between adjacent nodes was set to about 1.2 mm which was roughly equivalent to the sheet thickness. Then, the two-dimensional elements were applied with internal pressure in the normal directions using finite element analysis. The result is illustrated in FIG. 4A. The shape illustrated in FIG. 4A was regarded as the shape of the preformed shape. A tool of press forming was prepared and the preformed shape was draw formed using the tool. The result is illustrated in FIG. 9. Comparing FIG. 9 with not only FIG. 6 but also FIGS. 7 and 8, it can be seen that the thickness reduction was mitigated to prevent fractures.

[0072] Furthermore, a result of crash forming, as the second step, using a tool of press forming having the target shape is illustrated in FIG. 10. Since no significant thickness reduction occurred in the second step and no fracture occurred, it was confirmed that the method according to this disclosure is effective.

Example 2

[0073] A part having a shape illustrated in FIG. 11 was manufactured by press forming. The metallic sheet of the part was a steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1180 MPa and a sheet thickness of 1.2 mm.

[0074] As in Example 1, a method having only one step of draw forming was used as a conventional method (conventional method 2).

[0075] A method having a first step of shallow draw forming and a second step of crash forming with pad was used as a comparative method (comparative method 2).

[0076] The disclosed method had a first step of draw forming and a second step of crash forming (disclosed method 2).

[0077] First, a forming result of the conventional method 2 is illustrated in FIG. 12.

[0078] As illustrated in FIG. 12, using the conventional method 2, a large local thickness reduction occurred, which might lead to fraction.

[0079] Further, using the comparative method 2, a result of shallow draw forming is illustrated in FIG. 13 and a result of the crash forming with pad of the comparative method 2 is illustrated in FIG. 14. When the comparative method 2 was used, local thickness reduction occurred during the draw forming as the first step and the crash forming with pad as the second step and there was also a concern that a fracture might occur from this portion.

[0080] Next, in performing the disclosed method 2, the preformed shape was subjected to press forming analysis by the finite element method. As illustrated in FIGS. 15A and 15B, a part of the side wall portion and the top portion were discretized into two-dimensional elements and nodes. In the discretization, the interval between adjacent nodes was set to about 1.2 mm which was roughly equivalent to the sheet thickness. Then, the two-dimensional elements were applied with internal pressure in the normal directions using finite element analysis. The result is illustrated in FIG. 16A (FIG. 16B illustrates the target shape). The shape illustrated in FIG. 16A was regarded as the shape of the preformed shape and draw formed using a tool of press forming. The result is illustrated in FIG. 17. Comparing FIG. 17 with not only FIG. 12 but also FIGS. 13 and 14, it can be seen that the thickness reduction was mitigated to prevent fractures.

[0081] Furthermore, a result of crash forming using a tool of draw forming having the target shape as the second step is illustrated in FIG. 18. Since no significant thickness reduction occurred in the second step and no fracture occurred, it was confirmed that the method according to this disclosure is effective.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

[0082] 1 to 8 Nodes of a protrusion region [0083] 10 Formed part [0084] 11 Top portion [0085] 12 Side wall portion [0086] 13 Flange portion [0087] 14 Protrusion