Dual dilution rate closed loop insert
11548776 · 2023-01-10
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B67D7/36
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A consistent water to chemical ratio in each of two described operating modes is achieved by implementing a closed loop insert comprising a single straw with a dual dilution rate. The closed loop insert is installed at the packaging level and is recessed into the neck of the container so that it does not interfere with the bottle cap or the dispensing unit to which it might be attached. The closed loop engages with a mating cap adapter or chemical dispenser that keys up to a closed insert to allow the dilution dispenser to draw chemical out of the container through the use of a vacuum pressure. The dual dilution rate closed loop insert of the invention has two different metering tip sizes that fit inside a single straw closed loop insert, selected based upon operating modes.
Claims
1. A method for changing a flow rate of a chemical fluid from a chemical reservoir, the method comprising: applying a first vacuum pressure level to a metering device in an insert disposed in the chemical reservoir to expose a first fluid metering hole in the metering device and thereby dispense a first flow rate of the chemical fluid from the chemical reservoir; and applying a second different vacuum pressure level to the metering device in the insert, wherein the second different vacuum pressure level exposes a second fluid metering hole in the metering device which is differently sized than the first fluid metering hole to thereby dispense a second flow rate of the chemical fluid from the chemical reservoir, the second flow rate being different than the first flow rate.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of applying the second different vacuum pressure level comprises moving a diaphragm and an associated metering poppet, the movement of the metering poppet covering the first fluid metering hole and uncovering the second fluid metering hole.
3. The method as recited in claim 2, the method further comprising a step of disposing the insert in the chemical reservoir in a storage position, wherein both the first fluid metering hole and the second fluid metering hole are closed, so that no chemical fluid can be discharged from the chemical reservoir.
4. The method as recited in claim 3, and further comprising a step of threading a cap onto a threaded flange surrounding an opening in the chemical reservoir, the cap comprising a cap elbow having an outlet passage therein.
5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the step of threading the cap onto the threaded flange exposes an outlet hole in a piston comprising a part of the insert.
6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the step of threading the cap onto the threaded flange moves a valve which exposes the outlet hole in the piston.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first fluid metering hole is larger than the second fluid metering hole.
8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the first flow rate is 3-4 gallons per minute.
9. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the second flow rate is 1 gallon per minute.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(21) The closed loop insert system has been around for years and been proven to work effectively using vacuum to evacuate liquids from the container to the chemical dispensing equipment. However, the closed loop insert systems available in the market comprise a single straw and a single size metering tip. Most of the time, this single straw is utilized for both the low (bottle) flow fill rate (approximately 1 gpm) and for the high (bucket) flow fill rate (3-4 gpm), which, as discussed above, is a compromise resulting in inaccurate and inconsistent actual flow rates in each flow mode, with too much or too little chemical being used for the two different flow rates. This translates into poor results or a waste of chemical. As also discussed above, sometimes, where accurate flow rates in each flow mode are particularly important or desirable, a two straw system is employed, with a different metering tip in each of the two straws. This dual straw design requires specific chemical dilution dispensers to interface with the dual straw design. This requires the customer/user to change its whole chemical dispensing program, which can be very costly and complex.
(22) The present invention is unique and improved because it employs two differently sized metering tip holes in a single straw, allowing for chemical dilution dispensers to deliver the same chemical-to-water ratio for both identified flow rates. This works based on the application of a pressure differential on a rubber diaphragm, as will be described below. The metering tip holes are chosen based on the vacuum achieved by the selected flow rate, which activates a diaphragm that opens the particular metering tip hole for that selected flow rate. What makes the design unique is that the dual metering tip is designed into a single straw that is able to fit and interface with the majority of chemical dilution dispensers and mating caps used in the industry. This allows users to employ the inventive design without changing up their entire existing dispensing dilution program. The inventive dual dilution rate closed loop in a single straw design enables the user to obtain the correct flow rate of chemical and still be able to use their existing chemical dilution dispensers utilizing a single straw closed loop insert.
(23) The insert locks the chemical into the container to prevent leaks and spills throughout the product life cycle—from shipping to storage to use to disposal. After the chemical is consumed, the bottle with the insert is discarded or recycled. This makes it the “razor blade” of the chemical proportioning market.
(24) Now, with more particular reference to the drawings, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described in greater detail.
(25) In
(26) The
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30) A second exemplary embodiment of the insert system 20 of the present invention is shown in
(31) In
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35) Although, as noted above, there are some relatively minor structural differences between the embodiments of
(36) Operationally, as in the first embodiment, the piston outlet hole 36 is closed (covered) by the ball-type check valve 26 when the insert is 20 in a closed position. This is the storage orientation for the bottle 10 with the insert installed therein.
(37) When the cap 18 is installed, it pushes the ball-type check valve 26 downwardly, thereby compressing the sliding valve spring 28, consequently exposing the outlet hole 36 of the piston. In this orientation, which is the default position or high flow position, a larger hole 46 on the poppet 30 is exposed for chemical to pass through. A second smaller hole 48 on the poppet 30 is covered in this orientation and not accessible to fluid flow.
(38) At a higher vacuum (e.g. 23 Hg and above), the diaphragm 34 and metering poppet 30 are pulled upwardly to an “up” position, thereby compressing the poppet spring and thus exposing the smaller poppet hole 48 for chemical to flow through and covering the larger poppet hole 46. Depending upon the applied vacuum pressure, the diaphragm and metering poppet move upwardly or downwardly to expose the proper metering hole 46, 48 for chemical flow-through. When dispensing of the chemical is completed, the poppet spring 33 is biased to push the diaphragm 34 and metering poppet 30 back to their default position.
(39) Accordingly, although an exemplary embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that all the terms used herein are descriptive rather than limiting, and that many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made by one having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.