Drug Delivery System Comprising Nanocarrier Loaded with Urate Oxidase and Metal-Based Nanoparticle Capable of Degrading Hydrogen Peroxide and Pharmaceutical Composition Comprising the Same

Abstract

The present disclosure is directed to a drug delivery system in which urate oxidase and metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation are loaded in a temperature-sensitive nanocarrier, and a pharmaceutical composition for treating hyperuricemia-related disease comprising the drug delivery system. In the drug delivery system of the present disclosure, urate oxidase and metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation are positioned close to each other, thereby effectively removing the toxic substance hydrogen peroxide (H.sub.2O.sub.2) generated during uric acid degradation. The drug delivery system of the present disclosure may be developed as an active ingredient of a drug for preventing or treating hyperuricemia-related disease.

Claims

1. A drug delivery system comprising: (i) urate oxidase; (ii) metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation; and (iii) a temperature-sensitive nanocarrier loaded with (i) and (ii).

2. The drug delivery system of claim 1, wherein the metal based is metal, metal ion with chelate or metal oxide.

3. The drug delivery system of claim 2, wherein the metal is gold (Au), platinum (Pt), manganese (Mn), silver (Ag) or iron (Fe).

4. The drug delivery system of claim 2, wherein the metal ion with chelate is manganese ion (Mn2+), Prussian Blue (PB) or iron ion (Fe2+).

5. The drug delivery system of claim 2, wherein the metal oxide is manganese oxide (MnO2), iron oxide (Fe2O3) or ceria (CeO2).

6. The drug delivery system of claim 1, wherein the temperature-sensitive is a property in which the size of the nanocarrier decreases with increasing temperature and the size of the nanocarrier increases with decreasing temperature.

7. The drug delivery system of claim 6, wherein the temperature-sensitive nanocarrier is a Pluronic-based nanocarrier.

8. The drug delivery system of claim 7, wherein the Pluronic is a triblock copolymer comprising poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO).

9. The drug delivery system of claim 8, wherein the triblock copolymer comprising PEO-PPO-PEO further comprises a photo-crosslinkable functional group.

10. The drug delivery system of claim 1, wherein the weight ratio between the urate oxidase and the metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation is 1 (urate oxidase): 0.15 to 1.5 (metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation).

11. A pharmaceutical composition for preventing or treating hyperuricemia or hyperuricemia-related disease comprising: (i) a therapeutically effective amount of the drug delivery system of claim 1; and (ii) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

12. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 11, wherein the hyperuricemia-related disease is a disease selected from the group consisting of acute or chronic gout, gouty redness, gouty arthritis, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

13. A method for producing a drug delivery system comprising steps of: (a) preparing urate oxidase and metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation; and (b) loading a temperature-sensitive nanocarrier with the prepared urate oxidase and metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein step (b) is performed at a low temperature so that the size of the temperature-sensitive nanocarrier is increased.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0043] FIG. 1A is a schematic view showing that when uric acid (UA) is converted into 5-HIU by uric acid oxidase (UOX), toxic substance H.sub.2O.sub.2 is generated and can cause cell damage in tissues of hyperuricemia patients.

[0044] FIG. 1B shows cascade reactions between UOX and gold nanoparticles (AuNP).

[0045] FIG. 1C shows that when UOX and AuNP are loaded and encapsulated in a nanocarrier (NC) and co-administered, efficient degradation of UA may occur in vivo due to effective removal of H.sub.2O.sub.2.

[0046] FIG. 2A is a graph showing the degradation rate of UA by UOX in the presence of various concentrations of AuNP encapsulated in a nanocarrier (NC).

[0047] FIG. 2B is a graph comparing the size of a nanocarrier (NC) with that of UOX-AuNP@NC in the case in which UOX and AuNP were loaded in the nanocarrier (NC) to form a drug delivery system (UOX-AuNP@NC).

[0048] FIG. 2C shows a graph showing the change in surface charge of a nanocarrier (NC) and UOX-AuNP@NC after loading UOX and AuNP in the nanocarrier (NC), and shows the change in PDI value after loading UOX and AuNP.

[0049] FIG. 3A is a graph showing the results of analyzing UA degradation by comparing the cascade reactions of UOX and AuNP in different systems.

[0050] FIG. 3B is a graph showing the results of analyzing relative H.sub.2O.sub.2 generation by comparing the cascade reactions of UOX and AuNP in different systems.

[0051] FIG. 4A is a graph showing the cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP@NC in the absence of UA.

[0052] FIG. 4B is a graph showing the results of comparing cytotoxicity in the presence of UA in various systems, including a UOX-AuNP@NC system, to evaluate cytotoxicity induced by H.sub.2O.sub.2 (# p>0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, t-test and ANOVA).

[0053] FIG. 5A is a schematic view showing an experimental process for comparing the hyperuricemia treatment effects of various enzyme systems, including a UOX-AuNP@NC system, in vivo using a mouse model.

[0054] FIG. 5B is a graph comparing the hyperuricemia treatment effects of various enzyme systems, including a UOX-AuNP@NC system, in vivo.

[0055] FIG. 6 is a graph showing that the particle size of UOX-AuNP@NC is maintained at a substantially constant level in 10% serum-containing medium (37 C., 100 rpm) up to 7 days.

[0056] FIG. 7 is a graph showing residual UOX activity in blood 18 hours after administration of five enzyme systems.

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

[0057] Specific embodiments described herein are intended to represent preferred embodiments or examples of the present disclosure, and the scope of the present disclosure is not limited thereto. It is obvious to those skilled in the art that modifications and other uses of the present disclosure do not depart from the scope of the present disclosure as defined in the appended claims.

EXAMPLES

[0058] Experimental Materials and Method

[0059] 1. Materials

[0060] Gold nanoparticles (diameter: 5 nm) coated with poly(vinylpyrrolidone) were purchased from nanoComposix Inc. (San Diego, Calif.). Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) resin was purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, Calif., USA). A Vivaspin centrifugal concentrator with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 50 kDa was purchased from Sartorius Corporation (Bohemia, N.Y., USA). A PD-10 desalting column was purchased from GE Health Care (Piscataway, N.J., USA). Yeast extract, tryptone and agar were purchased from DB Biosciences (San Jose, Calif., USA). Pluronic F127 of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) (PEO100-PPO65-PEO100, molecular weight: 12.6 kDa) was obtained from BASF Corporation (Seoul, Korea). Acryloyl chloride was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI, Tokyo, Japan). 4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl-(2-hydroxy-2-propyl) ketone (Irgacure 2959) was obtained from Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc. (Basel, Switzerland). A Nanosep centrifugal device (MWCO 300 kDa) for spin filtration was purchased from Pall Life Sciences (Ann Arbor, Mich., USA). Unless otherwise indicated, all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, Mo., USA). All reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification.

[0061] 2. Purification of Urate Oxidase (UOX) and Production of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNP)

[0062] UOX was prepared as follows. Briefly, the plasmid-encoding UOX gene (pQE80-UOX) was transformed into TOP10 Escherichia coli cells. The transformed TOP10_pQE80-UOX cells were cultured for UOX expression. Cells expressing UOX were harvested and subjected to immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography using a hexahistidine affinity tag attached to UOX. The purity of UOX is equal to or more than 95%, as analyzed by SDS-PAGE analysis. The catalytic activity of the purified UOX was analyzed by uric acid degradation assay.

[0063] More specifically, the plasmid encoding a recombinant urate oxidase (UOX) gene derived from Aspergillus flavus under the control of T5 promoter (pQE80-UOX) was transformed into TOP10 E. coli cells. The pre-cultured transformed cells were inoculated into a fresh 2YT medium containing 100 g/mL of ampicillin, and shake-cultured at 220 rpm and at 37 C. When the optical density at 600 nm (OD.sub.600 nm) reached 0.5, 1 mM isopropyl -D-1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to the culture for induction of UOX expression and incubated for 5 hours. Then, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The cell pellets were stored at 80 C. until use, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 0.3 M sodium chloride, 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.4), and incubated with 100 g/mL of lysozyme on ice for 10 minutes. The resuspended cell pellets were sonicated on ice for 15 min (10-sec pulse on and 20-sec pulse off). The cell lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 C. for 40 minutes, and then Ni-NTA resin was added to the supernatant which was then incubated at 4 C. for 30 minutes. The supernatant incubated with the Ni-NTA resin was loaded onto a polypropylene column and washed with washing buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.4). After washing, UOX was eluted with elution buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 0.3 M sodium chloride, 250 mM imidazole, pH 7.4). The eluted UOX solution was buffer-exchanged with PBS buffer (pH 7.4) using a PD-10 column. The UOX concentration was determined by absorbance measurement at 280 nm using Synergy multimode microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, Vt., USA) according to Beer-Lambert's law. The extinction coefficient of UOX was 53,520 M.sup.1cm.sup.1.

[0064] Before encapsulation into nanocarriers (NC), the catalase-mimic catalytic activities of AuNPs were measured by H.sub.2O.sub.2 degradation assay.

[0065] 3. Determination of Degradation Rate of Uric Acid by UOX (Urate Oxidase)

[0066] In order to optimize the ratio of UOX to AuNPs, various concentrations of AuNPs (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 g/mL) were mixed with 500 nM UOX. To determine the degradation rate of UA, 200 M UA was mixed with UOX in PBS buffer (pH 7.4), and the absorbance at 293 nm was monitored using Synergy multi-mode microplate reader. The extinction coefficient of UA at 293 nm was 12,300 M.sup.1cm.sup.1.

[0067] 4. Production of UOX-AuNP@NCs

[0068] Pluronic-based nanocarriers (NCs) were synthesized by photo-crosslinking the micelle state of diacrylated pluronic F127 (DA-F127).

[0069] Briefly, a 10 wt % DA-F127 solution was prepared in deionized water (DIW). Then, 0.154 mL of the DA-F127 solution was added to 1.846 mL of DIW containing 0.057 wt % of irgacure 2959 to induce micelle formation of DA-F127. Using an ultraviolet (UV) lamp (VL-4.LC, 8 W, Vilber Lourmat, France), a photocrosslinking process for NC synthesis was performed by irradiation at 1.3 mW/cm.sup.2 for 15 minutes. The produced NCs were purified by dialysis for 1 day and freeze-dried. UOX and AuNPs were co-encapsulated into the nanocarriers (NCs) using the temperature-dependent size change of the NCs (UOX-AuNP@NCs).

[0070] Briefly, 1 mg of NCs was dissolved in 1 mL of a 5 M UOX solution containing 50 g of AuNPs. The mixture was incubated overnight at 4 C. to induce the size expansion of the NCs. Then, the temperature of the mixed solution was increased to 37 C. and maintained for 10 minutes to reduce the size of the NCs for encapsulation. The final solution was centrifuged using a Nanosep centrifugal device to remove unloaded UOX and AuNPs (11,000 rpm, 37 C., 10 min). Then, the amount of UOX in UOX-AuNP@NCs was measured by bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Micro BCA protein analysis kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass., USA). The loaded amount of AuNPs in UOX-AuNP@NCs was calculated by absorbance of AuNPs at 525 nm using a spectrometer (Molecular Devices, Spectra-MaxM2e, Trenton, N.J., USA).

[0071] 5. Size and Surface Charge of UOX-AuNP@NC

[0072] The sizes and surface charges of NCs and UOX-AuNP@NCs were analyzed at 37 C. using an electrophoretic light scattering system (ELS-8000, Otsuka Electronics Osaka, Japan). Then, the stability of UOX-AuNP@NCs was determined by measuring the size change of UOX-AuNP@NCs at 1 mg/mL in a cell culture medium (RPMI 1640, Gibco, N.Y., USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 C. and 100 rpm. The size of UOX-AuNP@NCs was observed at predetermined time points for 7 days.

[0073] 6. Determination of In Vitro UA Degradation Rate in NCs

[0074] In order to compare the UA degradation efficiencies, four enzyme systems were prepared as follows: (1) UOX, (2) UOX in NCs (UOX@NC), (3) UOX with AuNPs (UOX-AuNP), and (4) UOX-AuNP in NCs (UOX-AuNP@NC). Enzyme samples were incubated at 37 C. for 15 minutes and enzymatic assays of UOX at 10 nM were performed. 200 L of assay buffer (50 mM sodium borate buffer, pH 8.0, 100 M UA) was used and the UA degradation rates were calculated by measuring absorbance change at 293 nm.

[0075] 7. Determination of H.sub.2O.sub.2 Levels In Vitro

[0076] Concentrations of H.sub.2O.sub.2 generated by UOX systems (UOX, UOX@NC, UOX-AuNP, or UOX-AuNP@NC) when adding UA to the samples were estimated using degradation of N,N-dimethyl-4-nitroaniline (RNO). 0.25 M of RNO and 0.03 M of histidine were prepared in DIW and mixed together. Then, UOX, UOX@NC, UOX-AuNP or UOX-AuNP@NC solution was added to the RNO solution. The concentrations of UOX and UA were fixed at 200 nM and 1 mM, respectively. Then, H.sub.2O.sup.2 generation from each sample was measured by incubating the sample at room temperature for 10 minutes and observing N,N-dimethyl-4-nitroaniline (RNO) concentration by measuring absorbance at 440 nm.

[0077] 8. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP@NC

[0078] Cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP@NCs without UA was examined using squamous cell carcinoma-7 (SCC7) cells obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md., USA). First, SCC7 cells were seeded at 510.sup.3 cells/well in a 96-well tissue culture plate with a cell culture medium (RPMI 1640, Gibco, N.Y., USA) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The seeded cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37 C. under a 5% CO.sub.2 condition. Then, the cells were washed with PBS buffer (pH 7.4) and treated with the prepared UOX-AuNP@ NC samples at different concentrations (from 0 to 1 mg/mL on the basis of NC concentration). The sample-treated cells were incubated overnight at 37 C. Then, the cells were washed with PBS buffer, and the cytotoxicity of the UOX-AuNP@NCs without UA was calculated using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan).

[0079] 9. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Determination of H.sub.2O.sub.2 Generated by the UOX Systems

[0080] To examine the cytotoxicity of H.sub.2O.sub.2 generated by the UOX systems, the cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP@NC in the presence of UA was compared to that of UOX, UOX@NC and UOX-AuNP. SCC7 cells were seeded at 510.sup.3 cells/well in a 96-well tissue culture plate and cultured overnight at 37 C. under 5% CO.sub.2. The cultured cells were washed with PBS and treated with 100 L of each of samples such as UOX, UOX@NC, UOX-AuNP and UOX-AuNP@NC. Each sample was processed to a final concentration of 200 nM UOX and 1 mM UA. Among them, UOX@NC was a negative control. The sample-treated cells were incubated for 3 hours at 37 C. and washed with PBS. The cytotoxicity of sample groups in the presence of UA was determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8.

[0081] 10. Determination of In Vivo Uric Acid Level

[0082] For in vivo experiments, 8-week old C57BL/6 mice (Orient Bio Inc., Seongnam, South Korea) were used. To induce a hyperuricemia state in the mice, the mice were treated with hypoxanthine and potassium oxonate. Before the induction of hyperuricemia, all the mice were fasted overnight. Hypoxanthine was dissolved in 3% soluble starch solution and injected intragastrically into the mice at a dose of 475 g/g. Then, potassium oxonate was dissolved in a co-solvent composed of a mixture of lanolin and liquid paraffin (3:2, v/v) and injected subcutaneously into the hypoxanthine-treated mice at a dose of 95 g/g.

[0083] Five groups of mice were prepared: (1) normal mice (control), (2) untreated hyperuricemia mice, (3) hyperuricemia mice treated with UOX, (4) hyperuricemia mice treated with UOX-AuNP, and (5) hyperuricemia mice treated with UOX-AuNP@NC. 100 L of sample solution (UOX concentration was fixed at 1 M) of either PBS, UOX, UOX-AuNP or UOX-AuNP@NC was injected into the tail vein of the hyperuricemia mice. At predetermined time points (pre-induction and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 hours after injection), blood was collected from the sample-treated mice via retro-orbital bleeding. At 18 hours after injection of samples, blood was collected by cardiac puncture. The collected blood was centrifuged at 4 C. and 3000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain serum. The UA concentration in the serum was analyzed after sample injection to compare the effect of UA degradation by sample treatment. For measuring the serum level of uric acid, samples were analyzed by the previously reported method with little modification. Serum samples were mixed with 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6) and then stored at 4 C. until analysis. Reagent mixtures for determination of serum UA were prepared in 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6) at a concentration of 0.83 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) and 1.66 mM FeCl.sub.3.H.sub.2O. The absorbance at 593 nm was measured to determine the UA concentration. In addition, in the presence or absence of NCs, the UA degradation rates of serum samples at 18 hours after sample injection were measured to evaluate the residual activity of UOX.

[0084] Experimental Results

[0085] 1. Physiochemical Properties and Optimal Ratio of UOX and AuNPs Encapsulated in NCs

[0086] In the present disclosure, Pluronic-based NCs were used to deliver UOX and AuNPs simultaneously. UOX and AuNPs were co-encapsulated in NCs through temperature-dependent size changes. In order to achieve efficient UA degradation by UOX in the presence of AuNPs, the optimal ratio of UOX to AuNPs was examined. Various concentrations of AuNPs (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 g/mL) were mixed with 500 nM UOX, and then encapsulated in NCs. In all cases, the loading efficiencies were 90% or higher.

[0087] The enzymatic activity assay of samples showed that 5 g/mL was the optimal concentration of AuNPs for efficient UA degradation (see FIG. 2A). In the presence of 5 g/mL AuNPs, the amount of UA degraded by UOX was 2.5 times higher than that by UOX alone. The simple and efficient loading of various components into Pluronic-based NCs made it possible to modulate the composition of active components in the carrier and easily determine the optimal ratio between UOX and AuNPs. The ratio of UOX to AuNPs was fixed at the optimal ratio in all subsequent experiments. Under these conditions, the loading efficiency of UOX and AuNPs into the NCs was 90% or higher (928% AuNPs and 931% UOX, respectively).

[0088] The size and surface charge of the produced NCs were analyzed using an electrophoretic light scattering system at 37 C. to predict the size of NCs in the body. When UOX and AuNPs were not loaded, the size and surface charge of NCs were 6715 nm and 4.20.8 mV, respectively (see FIGS. 2B and 2C). After encapsulating UOX and AuNPs in NC (UOX-AuNP@NC), the size and surface charge of UOX-AuNP@NCs were 6519 nm and 5.11.7 mV, respectively (see FIGS. 2B and 2C), indicating that there was no significant change in the size and surface charge of NC upon loading of UOX and AuNPs. Efficient loading of AuNPs into NCs, instead of adsorption to the surface of NCs, was confirmed. In addition, considering the predicted net charge of UOX as +1.4 at pH 7.4, no increase but similar surface charge of NCs after loading both UOX and AuNPs supports that UOX together with AuNPs was loaded inside the NCs, instead of adsorption onto NC surfaces. In addition, UOX-AuNP@NC showed good size stability in a serum-containing medium (10% serum, 37 C., 100 rpm) up to 7 days (FIG. 6). This implies colloidal stability in vivo. Considering that Pluronic-based NCs can preserve protein activity and capture gold nanomaterials without perturbation of properties such as absorbance shift, it was speculated that the physicochemical properties of UOX and AuNPs are not substantially affected by the encapsulation of UOX and AuNPs. In FIG. 3A, the catalytic activity of UOX in NCs was not substantially reduced compared with that of free UOX. Similarly, the AuNPs in NCs exhibited catalytic activity comparable to that of free AuNPs. Therefore, it is expected that NCs simultaneously deliver UOX and AuNPs without compromising the critical properties in an in vivo environment.

[0089] 2. Enhanced Catalytic Activities of UOX Encapsulated Together with AuNPs in NCs

[0090] The present inventors analyzed the change in catalytic efficiency of UOX upon co-encapsulation with AuNPs in NCs. It was hypothesized that the efficiency of catalytic activity will be enhanced by two factors. One is that the addition of AuNPs will degrade the side-product H.sub.2O.sub.2, accelerating the UA degradation reaction. The other is the proximity effect of multiple catalysts in cascade reactions. Co-encapsulation of UOX and AuNPs in NCs will greatly reduce the distance between UOX and AuNPs, accelerating H.sub.2O.sub.2 degradation in situ. In order to prove these hypotheses, four groups of enzyme systems were prepared, including UOX alone (UOX), UOX encapsulated in NC (UOX@NC), a free mixture of UOX and AuNPs (UOX-AuNP), and UOX and AuNPs encapsulated in NCs (UOX-AuNP@NC). The degraded amounts of UA and H.sub.2O.sub.2 were measured. As shown in FIG. 3A, UOX and UOX@NC showed similar UA degradation rates. In the presence of AuNPs, UA degradation by UOX was 40% higher than that by UOX alone. In addition, UOX-AuNP@NC degraded 70% more UA than UOX alone. It was observed that UA degradation rate by UOX in NCs was similar to that by UOX alone.

[0091] Next, the present inventors examined whether different enzyme systems led to different H.sub.2O.sub.2 levels during UA degradation in vitro. H.sub.2O.sub.2 levels were estimated by measuring RNO degradation (FIG. 3B). In the case of UOX alone, almost 20% of RNO was degraded via H.sub.2O.sub.2 produced from UA degradation by UOX. Under the same reaction conditions, RNO degradation by UOX@NC was not significantly different from that by UOX alone. However, in the presence of AuNPs (UOX-AuNP), approximately 14% of RNO was degraded, indicating the lower H.sub.2O.sub.2 level. This result was consistent with the hypothesis of in situ degradation of H.sub.2O.sub.2 by AuNPs. Interestingly, when both UOX and AuNP were loaded into NCs (UOX-AuNP@NC), only about 5% of RNO was degraded, implying more efficient removal of H.sub.2O.sub.2 than UOX-AuNP. These RNO degradation assay results (FIG. 3B) were well consistent with UA degradation assay results (FIG. 3A).

[0092] Similar UA degradation and H.sub.2O.sub.2 production by UOX alone and UOX@NC indicate that NCs themselves did not substantially affect the enzymatic activity of UOX. More importantly, these results imply that NCs do not hinder the transport of UA as well as H.sub.2O.sub.2 across NCs or inside NCs. Thus, NCs not only provided the efficient loading of enzyme and nanoparticles, but also allowed the transport of small molecules including substrate and product for enzymatic reaction across or inside the carrier, which is a key requirement for proper action of delivered enzymes against target molecules present inside the body. A significant increase in the UA degradation and a significant decrease in H.sub.2O.sub.2 level of UOX-AuNP@NC compared to UOX-AuNP imply that NCs did not hinder the cascade reactions between them. In addition, these results demonstrate the hypothesis of the proximity effect made by co-localizing UOX and AuNPs in NCs on H.sub.2O.sub.2 removal and UA degradation. The present inventors speculated that the distances between UOX and AuNPs were closer in NCs than those between a free mixture of UOX and AuNPs. Considering that the blood volume is much greater than the sample injection volume, samples are expected to be substantially diluted in vivo upon administration. Therefore, the more pronounced effect of co-encapsulation of UOX and AuNPs in NCs on H.sub.2O.sub.2 removal and UA degradation would be expected in vivo. Through the above-described experimental results, the present inventors confirmed the favorable features of the Pluronic-based delivery platform having enhanced efficacy.

[0093] 3. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP@NC with or without UA

[0094] Before the in vivo experiment using UOX-AuNP @NC, the cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP@NC without UA was measured to verify the biosafety of the nanosystem using SCC7 cancer cells (FIG. 4A). The cytotoxicity was indicated by reduction in the cellular activity. The assay results showed that UOX-AuNP@NC without UA exhibited no cytotoxicity up to 1 mg/mL based on the NC concentration. Considering that NCs themselves have no in vitro toxicity, AuNP does not have severe toxicity issue, and UOX can produce toxic substance such as H.sub.2O.sub.2 only in the presence of UA. Thus, UOX-AuNP@NC, containing both UOX and AuNP inside the Pluronic-based NC, is expected to be safe without significant toxicity in the absence of UA.

[0095] In order to evaluate H.sub.2O.sub.2-related cytotoxicity, the cytotoxicity of UOX-AuNP @ NC system was compared to those of other samples in the presence of UA (FIG. 4B). SCC7 cancer cells were used because cancer cells are more susceptible to reactive oxygen species such as H.sub.2O.sub.2 accumulation than normal cells. As expected, UA alone samples (UA (+)) did not show any significant cytotoxicity, similar to negative control samples without UA (UA ()). In contrast, in the presence of UA, UOX samples showed significant (about 70%) cell death due to the produced H.sub.2O.sub.2. Encapsulation of UOX in NCs (UOX@NC) did not significantly reduce the cytotoxicity, similar to the results of H.sub.2O.sub.2 production (FIG. 3B). On the other hand, UOX and AuNPs dissolved solution (UOX-AuNP) samples showed the significantly reduced cytotoxicity (about 40%) due to H.sub.2O.sub.2 removal by AuNPs in the closed experimental setup. More importantly, UOX-AuNP@NC showed significantly reduced cytotoxicity compared to UOX-AuNP. The cellular activity of UOX-AuNP@NC samples was very high, and was even comparable to that of the control UA (). All of these results were well consistent with the results of UA degradation assay (FIG. 3A) and H.sub.2O.sub.2 production assay (FIG. 3B). In addition, these results suggest that H.sub.2O.sub.2 generated by UOX during UA degradation can cause toxicity, a potential side-effect in in vivo clinical applications; however, efficient removal of H.sub.2O.sub.2 by UOX-AuNP@NC can significantly mitigate the toxicity issue of H.sub.2O.sub.2 produced by UOX.

[0096] 4. Evaluation of In Vivo Activities of NC Loaded with UOX and AuNP

[0097] To evaluate the therapeutic effect of UOX-AuNP @NC in vivo, a hyperuricemia mouse model was used, as shown in FIG. 5A. Mice were divided into the following groups: normal control (Control), hyperuricemia (Hyperuricemia), UOX-treated (UOX), UOX-AuNP-treated (UOX-AuNP), and UOX-AuNP@NC-treated (UOX-AuNP@NC) groups. C57BL/6 hyperuricemia mice were injected with UOX, UOX-AuNP, or UOX-AuNP@ NC by intravenous administration with the same amount of enzyme. Blood samples obtained at predetermined time points were analyzed and the concentrations of UA were determined using a calibration curve (FIG. 5B).

[0098] First, among the experimental groups, the hyperuricemia group showed a much higher (over 3-fold) UA concentration in serum at 1 hour compared to the pre-induction (0 hour) or the normal control (no hyperuricemia) group (FIG. 5B). At 3 hours after induction of hyperuricemia, a 2-fold or more increase in UA concentration was observed for the hyperuricemia group compared to pre-induction (0 hour) or the normal control group. At 6 hour after induction of hyperuricemia, the hyperuricemia group showed similar UA concentrations in serum compared to that of the control group or the pre-induction state. Thus, the method for hyperuricemia induction induced an increase in the UA concentration initially, then lasted at least up to 3 hours. This temporal effect on hyperuricemia was also reported in previous reports using the similar induction method. In contrast, UOX-treated groups (UOX, UOX-AuNP, and UOX-AuNP@NC) all showed significantly lower concentrations of UA than that of the hyperuricemia group at both 1 hour and 3 hours, confirming the UA degradation by UOX in vivo. Among UOX-treated groups, UOX and UOX-AuNP showed very similar UA concentrations (similar UA degradation), whereas UOX-AuNP@NC showed a significantly lower concentration of UA than UOX and UOX-AuNP, revealing a superior UA degradation by UOX-AuNP@NC compared to UOX and UOX-AuNP (FIG. 5B). The similar effects of UOX and UOX-AuNP suggest that simple mixing and co-injection of UOX and AuNP was not sufficient to achieve the cascade reaction of UOX and AuNP in vivo. Thus, as expected, dilution after injection seemed to prevent the co-localization of UOX and AuNP in vivo. In contrast, much more effective degradation of UA by UOX-AuNP@ NC compared to UOX and UOX-AuNP proved that co-delivery of UOX and AuNP by NC encapsulation could make a sufficient environment for the cascade reaction to occur in blood.

[0099] In addition, at 6 hours or later, the UOX and UOX-AuNP groups showed similar UA concentrations compared to the normal or hyperuricemia group in contrast to the maintenance of lower concentration of UA for the UOXAuNP@NC group, indicating that only the UOX-AuNP@NC group was effective up to 18 hours. Considering the biodistribution results of Pluronic-based NCs, which showed that when administered intravenously, the administered NC stayed in the main organ (predominantly in the liver) for at least 1 day in the previous experiment, the residual UA degradation effect at a later time point appeared to be because the in vivo half-life of UOX and AuNP was extended by encapsulation into NCs. At 18 hours, the residual UOX activity in serum by UOX-AuNP@NC was confirmed (FIG. 7).

[0100] Clearance of the toxic intermediate H.sub.2O.sub.2 can facilitate UA degradation. Also, the effective removal of H.sub.2O.sub.2 by UOX-AuNP@NC can lower the toxicity issue associated with H.sub.2O.sub.2. Thus, the UA degradation effect was significantly enhanced by co-delivering UOX and AuNP using NC (UOX-AuNP@NC) in vivo, and the delivery platform of the present disclosure has an obvious clinical potential for hyperuricemia treatment through synergistic effect of UOX and AuNPs.

[0101] The effects and advantages of the present disclosure are summarized as follows.

[0102] (i) The present disclosure is directed to a drug delivery system in which urate oxidase and metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation are loaded in a temperature-sensitive nanocarrier, and a pharmaceutical composition for treating hyperuricemia-related disease comprising the drug delivery system.

[0103] (ii) In the drug delivery system of the present disclosure, urate oxidase and metal-based nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide degradation are positioned close to each other, thereby effectively removing the toxic substance hydrogen peroxide (H.sub.2O.sub.2) generated during uric acid degradation.

[0104] (iii) The drug delivery system of the present disclosure may be developed as an active ingredient of a drug for preventing or treating hyperuricemia-related disease.

[0105] Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to specific features, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that this description is only of a preferred embodiment thereof, and does not limit the scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the substantial scope of the present disclosure will be defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereto.