CELL RETENTION DEVICE

Abstract

A cell retention device includes a structured support with a plurality of circumferentially distributed ribs to retain the active filtering surface of a flexible, porous membrane filter medium. The filter medium surrounds the support in contact with the peaks of the ribs, thereby forming axial voids between the rib peaks. This arrangement imparts sufficient structural support over small regions of the filter medium to facilitate its use in a circular (or other rounded) configuration while providing sufficient channel volume to support high throughput of fluid sparse of cells.

Claims

1. A filter comprising: an elongated nonporous element having a plurality of axial ribs circumferentially distributed around an exterior portion thereof, the ribs having radial peaks and radial recessions therebetween; a membrane filter medium surrounding the exterior portion of the nonporous element in contact with the peaks of the ribs, thereby forming a plurality of axial voids between the radial recessions and the membrane filter medium; a central channel extending axially through at least a portion of the nonporous element and terminating in an outlet; and at least one radial channel fluidically coupling the axial voids to the central channel, whereby negative pressure at the outlet propagates through the axial channels to the membrane filter medium.

2. The filter of claim 1, wherein the elongated element is substantially nonporous.

3. The filter of claim 1, wherein the elongated element has pores sized to exclude cells and selectively allow proteins and fluids to pass.

4. The filter of claim 3, wherein the pores have diameters ranging from 10 nm to 5 m.

5. The filter of claim 3, wherein the pores are sized to allow proteins having weights up to 500 kDa to pass.

6. The filter of claim 1, wherein the elongated element is fully nonporous.

7. The filter of claim 1, wherein the at least one radial channel has a first end opening into the central channel and a second end opening into an annular region radially recessed relative to the ribs.

8. The filter of claim 7, wherein the annular region is unribbed.

9. The filter of claim 7, wherein the annular region has a plurality of circumferentially distributed radial channels therethrough.

10. The filter of claim 7, wherein the elongated element includes a plurality of unribbed annular regions each having a plurality of circumferentially distributed radial channels therethrough.

11. The filter of claim 1, wherein the filter medium is cellulose ester.

12. The filter of claim 1, wherein the filter medium is polyethersulfone.

13. The filter of claim 1, wherein the filter medium is cellulose acetate.

14. The filter of claim 1, wherein the filter medium is polyvinylidene fluoride.

16. The filter of claim 1, wherein the filter medium is polycarbonate.

16. The filter of claim 1, wherein the nonporous element has a substantially circular cross-section.

17. The filter of claim 1, wherein the radial peaks each have (i) a radial height relative to the radial recessions and (b) a circumferential width, the radial height being approximately equal to the circumferential width.

18. The filter of claim 1, wherein the central channel has first diameter and the elongated element with the membrane filter medium wrapped therearound has a second diameter, a ratio of the first diameter to the second diameter ranging from 0.1 to 0.95.

19. The filter of claim 18, wherein the ratio of the first diameter to the second diameter is 0.75.

20. The filter of claim 1, wherein the elongated element has a length and the the elongated element with the membrane filter medium wrapped therearound has a diameter, a ratio of the element length to the diameter being approximately 3.0.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] The foregoing and the following detailed description will be more readily understood when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which:

[0019] FIG. 1 is an elevation of a support in accordance with embodiments of the invention.

[0020] FIG. 2A is a sectional view of a portion of the axial length of the support shown in FIG. 1.

[0021] FIG. 2B is a transverse sectional view of the support shown in FIG. 1, taken along the line A-A in FIG. 2A.

[0022] FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a middle segment of the support shown in FIG. 1.

[0023] FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an end segment of the support shown in FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0024] Refer first to FIG. 1, which illustrates a support 100 that includes a stacked series of longitudinal segments collectively indicated at 105, and terminating in first and second opposed ports or outlets 1101, 1102. In some embodiments, the support 100 includes only one outlet 110. The support 100 also includes a series of axial, circumferentially distributed ribs 115 interrupted by one or more radially recessed annular regions 120. The recessed regions 120 each contain one or more bores 125 leading to an interior central channel discussed in greater detail below. The support 100 may be fabricated using any suitable method (e.g., molding, etching, 3D printing, etc.) from any suitable durable, solid, nonporous material such as stainless steel or other metal, highly crosslinked polymer, or ceramic material. Examples of suitable materials include cellulose acetate (CA), polycarbonate, cellulose ester (CE), polyethersulfone (PES), or modified polyethersulfone (mPES). Such materials are herein referred to as fully nonporous. Some porosity may be acceptable so long as the pores are sized to exclude cells and selectively allow proteins or other components in the fluids to pass. These pores may be sized from 10 nm to 5 m. The pores may allow proteins of 5 kDa, 10 kDa, 20 kDa, 30 kDa, 40 kDa, 50 kDa, 60 kDa, 70 kDa, 80 kDa, 90 kDa, 100 kDa, 110 kDa, 120 kDa, 130 kDa, 140 kDa, 150 kDa, 160 kDa, 170 kDa, or up to 500 kDa, or any weight in between these values to pass. In some embodiments, the pore sizing is selected to be 0.22 m, 0.45 m, 0.9 m, 1 m, 2 m, 5 m, or any diameter in between these values. Such materials are herein referred to as substantially nonporous.

[0025] FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate the central interior channel 130 extending through at least a portion of the axial length of the support 100, i.e., with reference to FIG. 1, at least from an outlet 110 to the radial bores 125 of the sole or distal recessed region 120. A membrane filter 135 surrounds the support 100, its interior surface resting against the peaks of the ribs 115 to form axial voids 140 along the support 100. These voids 140 are in fluid communication with the recessed region(s) 120 and, hence, with the central channel 130 via the radial bores 125.

[0026] The arrows in FIGS. 2A and 2B indicate fluid flow through the device. Negative pressure applied at the outlet 110 draws surrounding liquid through the membrane filter 135 and along the axial voids 140 toward the radial bores 125 that lead to the central channel 130. The device is bidirectional and negative pressure may alternatively be applied at the other outlet 110.

[0027] The membrane filter 135 can be molded as a cylindrical sleeve that may be drawn over the form 100, or may instead be a planar sheet that is wrapped around the form 100. Because of the closely spaced ribs 115 that it surrounds, the membrane filter 135 does not experience excessive bending or other radial strain despite the vacuum applied to its interior surface, and therefore need only be stiff enough to avoid collapse into the recesses between ribs 115 during operation. This facilitates use of a wide range of conventional filter materials, including cellulose ester, polyethersulfone, and cellulose acetate. As noted above, the support 100 may be assembled as a stacked sequence of segments 105 that may be screwed or otherwise sealably fitted together, affording a variable length that may be tailored to a particular application.

[0028] As illustrated in FIG. 3, a middle segment 305.sub.1 may include respective female and male threaded connectors 310, 315 and multiple such segments may be assembled in desired numbers between top and bottom segments to form the final support 100. The radially recessed annular regions 120 occur where two segments are connected; for example, the bores may extend through a flat (unthreaded) upper region of the male threaded connector 315.

[0029] A representative top segment 405 is shown in FIG. 4. The segment 405 may include respective terminal and male threaded connectors 410, 415. The terminal connector 410 facilitates fluid connection to the central interior channel 130. The optimal size of the segments 305.sub.1, 405 relative to the overall length of a typical support 100 depends on the desired degree of design flexibility for users and the performance sensitivity to small changes in overall length. In general, the segments 305.sub.1, 405 may range in length from 1 cm to 10 cm. A typical length of the overall support may range from from 5 cm to 50 cm.

[0030] Various other dimensions and parameters may be varied to suit particular applications. The interior diameter (ID) i.e., the diameter of the central channel 130determines the flow rate through the device. For example, it may be desirable to keep protein velocity at or below 2 m/s. Various embodiments utilize IDs ranging from 1 to 147 mm; a representative ID is 4 mm. The radial bores 125 may have diameters ranging from 1 mm to 5 mm. The number of bores through each radially recessed annular region 120 may typically range from one to 10, but larger devices may have 20 or more bores.

[0031] The outer diameter (OD) of the device 100 including the membrane filter 135 often represents a compromise between sufficient overall filter surface area (given the device length) and space constraints within a bioreactor. A representative (but non-limiting) minimum is 10 mm, and a typical value is 20 mm. The OD and ID may be considered together. The difference (i.e., the thickness of the support 100) must be adequate to support the pressure differential to which the support will be subjected. Increasing the ID:OD ratio means decreasing wall thickness, reducing mass and hence mechanical durability, but also reducing the pressure drop across the support. A representative range of ID:OD values is 0.1 to 0.95, with an optimal value of about 0.75.

[0032] The optimal overall device length may reflect application-related considerations (e.g., the size of a bioreactor, the amount of necessary surface area, etc.) as well as manufacturing considerations (e.g., assembly and heat sealing). Typical supports 100 may range in length from mm to 400 mm. Length may also be considered alongside OD, e.g., as a ratio. This ratio may range from as little as 1.0 to very high levels limited by bioreactor geometry and working liquid level. At this time a ratio of about 3.0 appears optimal.

[0033] The ribs 115 may be specified in terms of a depth (i.e., the height of the rib peak relative to the lowest point of the recession) and a width, or a ratio of depth to width. An optimal depth-to-width ratio is about 1.0, although values ranging from 0.1 to 15 are suitable. At a ratio of 1.0, the height of the peak is about the same as the width of the peak. This is the easiest form to manufacture (deep recesses can be hard to release from a mold intact). Ribs having a higher ratio may offer less mechanical stability and smaller flow channels, and may be more difficult to machine. A lower ratio means that a smaller amount of pressure-induced bowing of the filter material may reduce or eliminate flow through the channels. Typical depth values range from 0.1 mm to 10 mm, with about 1 mm being optimal in practical bioprocessing systems.

[0034] The number of ribs 115 may range from a low of three to higher values limited primarily by application, manufacturing and geometric (i.e., maintaining discreteness) considerations. The more ribs that are used for a given OD, the lower the flow will be between the membrane 135 and the support 100, but the greater the support that will be provided to the membrane to prevent collapse under pressure. The minimum number of ribs 115 for an application involving a given flow rate and pressure drop is that number which will prevent excessive bowing of the filter material into the axial voids 140 (i.e., bowing sufficient to retard flow).

[0035] The number of ribs 115 may also be considered as a ratio relative to the OD; that is, with the same rib geometry, the number of ribs distributed circumferentially around the support 100 may be varied. Optimally, as noted above, the channel width matches the rib width, corresponding to a ratio of 1.0 (or approximately 1.0). But this ratio may vary from, for example, 0.5 to 2, with smaller ratios producing larger flow channels and larger ratios resulting in smaller flow channels. In terms of performance, reducing the ratio is equivalent to decreasing the number of ribs, and increasing the ratio is equivalent to increasing the number of ribs.

[0036] The terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms and expressions of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof. In addition, having described certain embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts disclosed herein may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.