METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE SIZE OF NANOPARTICLES IN A COLLOID

Abstract

The system includes an adjustable light source constructed to direct a beam of electromagnetic radiation at a specimen chamber that allows a portion of the beam to scatter when illuminating particles within the chamber. The scattered portion of the beam is directed to a sensor, the sensor having a frame rate and a time period between frames. The system may have a processor connected to the sensor and light source, the processor may perform the following steps: activate the light source and obtain images from sensor; if the images from the sensor show that particles are blinking then reduce the frame rate, set the exposure time to at least 60% of the time between frames and reduce the illumination. Then the processor obtains additional images and processes those images to mitigate blurring. The processor determines the Brownian motion of the particles from the processed images and determines the sizes of the particles based on the motion.

Claims

1. A method for determining the size of particles for use in a system that comprises a light source constructed to direct a beam of electromagnetic radiation at a specimen chamber that allows a portion of the beam to scatter when illuminating particles within the chamber, wherein the scattered portion is directed to a sensor the sensor having an image plane, the system further comprises electrodes constructed to produce an electric field within the image plane and across in the specimen chamber, the method comprising: A. activating the light source; B. obtaining images from sensor while actuating the electrodes to produce the electric field; C. determining the Brownian motion of the particles from the images of step (B); D. decomposing the motion into a first component that is substantially parallel to the electric field and a second component that is substantially orthogonal to the electric field; E. for each component, determining the sizes of the particles.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: prior to step (B): (1) obtaining images from sensor; (2) determining the Brownian motion of the particles from the images; (3) determining the sizes of the particles based on the Brownian motion; (4) determining a particle size distribution (PSD) function based on the determined sizes; (5) from the PSD determining whether the particles are elongated; (6) if the particles are elongated, continue to steps (B)-(E).

3. A system for determining the particle size distribution of a colloid, the system comprising: A light source constructed to direct a beam of electromagnetic radiation at a specimen chamber, the chamber constructed to allow a portion of the beam to scatter when illuminating particles within the chamber; a sensor position to detect the scatter of the beam, the sensor having an image plane; electrodes constructed to produce an electric field within the image plane and across the specimen chamber; a processor connected to the light source, sensor and electrodes; the processor configured to perform the following steps: A. activating the light source; B. obtaining images from sensor while actuating the electrodes to produce the electric field; C. determining the Brownian motion of the particles from the images of step (B); D. decomposing the motion into a first component that is substantially parallel to the electric field and a second component that is substantially orthogonal to the electric field; E. for each component, determining the sizes of the particles.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the processor performs the following steps before step (B): (1) obtaining images from sensor; (2) determining the Brownian motion of the particles from the images; (3) determining the sizes of the particles based on the Brownian motion; (4) determining a particle size distribution (PSD) function based on the determined sizes; (5) from the PSD determining whether the particles are elongated; (6) if the particles are elongated, continue to steps (B)-(E).

Description

5.0 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] The invention can be better understood with reference to the following figures. The components within the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed on clearly illustrating example aspects of the invention. In the figures reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views and/or embodiments. It will be understood that certain components and details may not appear in the figures to assist in more clearly describing the invention.

[0019] FIG. 1 is a series of image frames taken at a fast rate, showing the blinking of nanoparticles.

[0020] FIG. 2A is the particle size distribution of an elongated nanoparticle colloid.

[0021] FIG. 2B is the particle size distribution of a spherical nanoparticle colloid.

[0022] FIG. 3A illustrates several elongated nanoparticle in a solution.

[0023] FIG. 3B illustrates several elongated nanoparticle in a solution aligned in an electric field that is parallel to the image plane.

[0024] FIG. 4A is an improved method to size particles.

[0025] FIG. 4B is a subroutine for image detection, processing and PSD plotting.

[0026] FIG. 4C is a subroutine to reduce blinking.

[0027] FIG. 5 is a schematic of an instrument setup.

6.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0028] Reference is made herein to some specific examples of the present invention, including any best modes contemplated by the inventor for carrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying figures. While the invention is described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to the described or illustrated embodiments. To the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

[0029] In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. Particular example embodiments of the present invention may be implemented without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, process operations well known to persons of skill in the art have not been described in detail in order not to obscure unnecessarily the present invention. Various techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be noted that some embodiments include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple mechanisms unless noted otherwise. Similarly, various steps of the methods shown and described herein are not necessarily performed in the order indicated, or performed at all in certain embodiments. Accordingly, some implementations of the methods discussed herein may include more or fewer steps than those shown or described. Further, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes describe a connection, relationship or communication between two or more entities. It should be noted that a connection or relationship between entities does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection, as a variety of other entities or processes may reside or occur between any two entities. Consequently, an indicated connection does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection unless otherwise noted.

[0030] The following list of example features corresponds with the attached figures and is provided for ease of reference, where like reference numerals designate corresponding features throughout the specification and figures: [0031] Image Frame 10 [0032] Scattering Nanoparticles 15 [0033] Non-scattering Nanoparticles 20 [0034] Brownian Translational Movement 25 [0035] Grouping 30 [0036] Nanoparticle 1, 2, 3 35A, 35B, 35C [0037] Particle Size Distribution (PSD) (Elongated Nanoparticle) 40 [0038] Particle Size Distribution (Spherical Nanoparticle) 45 [0039] Elongated Nanoparticles in Absence of Electric Field 50 [0040] Elongated Nanoparticles in Presence of Electric Field 55 [0041] Sensor Image Plane 56 [0042] Electric Field 60 [0043] Example Brownian Movement Vector 65 [0044] First Component of Movement Parallel with Electric Field 70 [0045] Second Component of Movement Orthogonal with Electric Field 75 [0046] Improved Method to Size Nanoparticles 100 [0047] Steps for Improved Method to Size Nanoparticles 105-160 [0048] Subroutine for Image Detection, Processing and PSD Plotting 200 [0049] Steps for Subroutine for Image Detection, Processing and PSD Plotting 205-220 [0050] Subroutine to Reduce Blinking 230 [0051] Steps for Subroutine to Reduce Blinking 235-255 [0052] Instrument Setup 310 [0053] Adjustable Light Source 315 [0054] Light Beam 320 [0055] Optical Objective 325 [0056] Light Sheet 330 [0057] Specimen Chamber 335 [0058] Scattered Light 340 [0059] Focusing Optical Objective 345 [0060] Focused Light Beam 350 [0061] Sensor (e.g., Camera) 355 [0062] Processor 360 [0063] Electrodes 365

[0064] A complicated situation that is solved in this disclosure involves tracking of nanoparticles that due to Brownian rotational movements exhibit very strong blinking or rapid changes of the intensity of scattered light. This can be also the case of spherical particles that were chipped off crystalline-like materials, typical of many colloids produced by disintegration of solid rocks in turbid river waters that carry plenty of inorganic materials. Such particles usually have many faces or flat surfaces created by crystalline planes of the originating material. Colloids containing such gem-like particles are nearly impossible to analyze using standard particle tracking methods because rapid changes in the intensity of scattered light (blinking) prevents recording of continuous tracks depicting Brownian motion as discussed above.

[0065] FIG. 1 represents six image frames 10 of video taken at 30 frames/second (fps). Nanoparticles are either scattering 15 (solid circle) or non-scattering 20 (dashed circle). So any non-scattering nanoparticle 20 will not be detected by the sensor that is capturing these image frames. Because the nanoparticles experience both translational (shown by arrow 25), and rotational Brownian movement, nanoparticles can scatter in one frame and disappear in the next, only to re-appear later in a completely different position, making tracking of the particles impossible. Without accurate tracking of Brownian movement, the particle size cannot be accurately calculated.

[0066] Grouping 30 in frames 4, 5 and 6 of FIG. 1, illustrates the blinking and movement of three nanoparticles 35A, 35B and 35C. Within this grouping 30, the processor may make the mistake of determining that nanoparticle 35B (frame 4) moved and is nanoparticle 35C (frame 5), when in fact the movement of nanoparticle 35B was completely different than what was determined by the processor.

[0067] The proposed solution in such cases is to use of an extremely low number of recorded frames per second. Instead of a typical 30 fps, one should use 10 smaller number of frames per second and at the same time apply increased exposure time. As an example, when using 30 fps, one typically employs exposure times of about 15 msec or about half of the time between frames (in this case 33 msec). With 4 fps or 250 msec frame length, one should use exposure of at least 200 msec which of course necessitates instrumentation that allows for not only changes in camera gain but also possibility of lowering the power of illuminating laser to prevent overexposure of imagined particles.

[0068] But having a long exposure introduces its own problem. Images on subsequent frames become fuzzy because of Brownian motion during exposure. Proper statistical methods can resolve such fuzziness being detrimental to accuracy of particle size determination, cf. e.g. X. Michalet and A. J. Berglund 2012 Phys Rev E85, pp. 061916-1-061916-14. Such low fps measurements are possible and they can give accurate sizing of observed particles because much longer tracks lasting for many seconds can be recorded and processed automatically by modern processors.

[0069] FIG. 4A discloses a method that mitigates the effects of nanoparticle blinking. If the nanoparticles are blinking (step 105), then subroutine 230 is engaged. First, the system determines the original count of blinking incidents in the images (step 235) and then reduces the frame rate and increases the exposure time to be equal at least 60% of the time between frames (step 240). Because the exposure time for each frame is increased, the illumination should be reduced, otherwise nanoparticles will scatter too much light and drown out adjacent particles, rendering those adjacent particles invisible to the sensors (step 245). The system then checks if the number of blinking incidents has been reduced sufficiently in step 250, and if not the frame rate is again reduced (step 255). Although not shown, if the frame rate is again reduced, the exposure time will be increased and the illumination may need to be again reduced. The system continues to check after frame rate reductions until the blinking incidents have been reduced to a preset value. This value may be set to optimize the ability of the processor to de-blur the images to achieve accurate particle tracking.

[0070] Instead of engaging in the subroutine 230, the system may just reduce the frame rate to 4 fps with at least a 200 msec exposure for each frame.

[0071] After the blinking has been addresses the system may perform subroutine 200, which entails recording images at the new frame rate, frame exposure length and illumination (step 205). Then the system detects the particle locations in step 210, processes the images to correct for the blurred movement to arrive at an accurate tracking of the distance moved in step 215. From this movement, the particle size can be determined and plotted in step 220.

[0072] The remainder of the method shown in FIG. 4A relates to the problems associated with an elongated particle, which will now be discussed. Brownian movements of elongated particles are naturally separated into two components: movements along longer axis are more vigorous while movements in the direction perpendicular to that axis are more constrained due to viscosity of the diiluent. This means that sizes inferred from Brownian movements in each direction will be different. It is expected that movements along longer axis will represent small diameter of each particle (movements will be more vigorous) while movements perpendicular to the longer axis will correspond to much larger size or their length (movements will be smaller). If Brownian rotation perpendicular to the longer axis of tracked particles is slow as compared to the observation time (several seconds), one will notice distribution of apparent sizes between diameter of the rod-like particles and their length. Practically, it means a very broad distribution of sizes with most probable size being the average of two dimensions: diameter and length of a particle. In case of an example of TMVs mentioned in the introduction, this is about 160 nm with distribution extending from nearly zero up to 300 nm diameters or even more due to the natural broadening of the distribution (limited number of tracking steps in tracking process).

[0073] FIG. 2A presents such a distribution 40 measured experimentally with special recording conditions specific to the method being patented imposed to mitigate blinking. For comparison, FIG. 2B illustrate the particle size distribution function (PSD) 45 for a spherical nanoparticle. The base of the elongated nanoparticle is much broader than the sharp and narrow base of the spherical nanoparticle. Therefore, by analyzing the PSD the system can determine that the observed nanoparticles are elongated and can take steps to increase the accuracy of the Brownian tracking, and thus imposing the accuracy of the size calculations.

[0074] FIG. 3A illustrates several elongated nanoparticle 50 that are randomly suspended in a colloid. When the particle has an electric dipole moment, i.e. they can interact with a static electric field by aligning their axis with the field, such a field can be used to accurately determine the size of the particle in two projections. FIG. 3B illustrates the application of an electric field 60 within the image plane of the sensor 56, which aligns the elongated nanoparticles 55. If the nanoparticles are all aligned then Brownian motion distances observed as a projection on the surface of a camera's sensor will give two different sizes depending on the direction of tracking (along or perpendicular to the direction of the field applied). In such case, to get dimensions of elongated nanoparticles present in a colloid, one just needs to perform standard Brownian analysis of mean square distance but to do that separately in two perpendicular components. Specifically, if the nanoparticles Brownian motion is represented by vector 65, then that can be decomposed into a first component parallel with the electric field 70 and a second component orthogonal to the electric field 75. For simplicity, the electric field can be constructed to align the nanoparticles along the rows or the columns of sensor's pixels.

[0075] Returning to FIG. 4A, the system may determine from the PSD whether there is a broad based-triangle (step 110broad-based triangle denotes shape of PSD that resembles triangle with a horizontal side extending from very small size of about 10 nm up to the maximum expected length of elongated particles, e.g. 300 nm in case of MTVs with understanding that the tail of PSD can extended to even larger values due to aggregates of particles and small number of impurities always present in colloids) and if so expose the sample volume to an electric field within the sensor image plane (step 120). The system records the images, detects the locations of the nanoparticles in the images and de-blurs the images to arrive at a distance and directions moved in steps 125-130. Then in step 140 the movement is decomposed into a first and second component. Based on the first component, which is parallel to the electric field, the size of the nanoparticle is determine and plotted (step 145), from which the size of the nanoparticle is determined representing the first nanoparticle dimension (step 150). The same is done based on the second component with is orthogonal to the first component, as shown in steps 155 and 160.

[0076] FIG. 5 illustrates a system using the methods and devices disclosed herein. The system 10 includes an adjustable light source 315 that produces light beam 320 that passes through cylindrical lens and an optical objective 325 that form a light sheet 330, which is directed at specimen chamber 335. The chamber 335 contains the nanoparticles in a colloid made out of a diluent. Electrodes 365 when actuated cause an electric field 60 across the specimen chamber 335.

[0077] The nanoparticles in the chamber 335 scatter light 340 that is directed through a focusing optical objective 345 (which may also include magnifying optical objectivesi.e., a microscope), producing a focused light beam 350 onto a sensor (e.g., camera) 355. A processor 360 may be connected to the sensor 355, the light source 315 and the electrodes 365 to control them. The setup 310 enables illumination of any liquid with a precisely-formed, narrow light sheet and observation of scattered light from the nanoparticles, usually at a 90-degree angle relative to the light sheet plane. In other words, the direction of observation is perpendicular to the direction of the plane of illumination. The processor 360 may be configured to perform the methods disclosed herein.

[0078] Although exemplary embodiments and applications of the invention have been described herein including as described above and shown in the included example Figures, there is no intention that the invention be limited to these exemplary embodiments and applications or to the manner in which the exemplary embodiments and applications operate or are described herein. Indeed, many variations and modifications to the exemplary embodiments are possible as would be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The invention may include any device, structure, method, or functionality, as long as the resulting device, system or method falls within the scope of one of the claims that are allowed by the patent office based on this or any related patent application.