Probiotic recolonisation therapy

Abstract

The present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions suitable for the treatment of chronic diseases associated with the presence of abnormal or an abnormal distribution of microflora in the gastrointestinal tract of a mammalian host, which compositions comprise viable non-pathogenic or attenuated pathogenic Clostridia. The compositions further comprise one or more additional viable non-pathogenic or attenuated pathogenic microorganisms selected from the group consisting of Bacteroides, Eubacteria, Fusobacteria, Propionibacteria, Lactobacilli, anaerobic cocci, Ruminococcus, E. coli, Gemmiger, Desulfomonas, Peptostreptococcus, and fungi. The present invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions suitable for the treatment of the same chronic diseases comprising viable non-pathogenic or attenuated pathogenic Escherichia coli, at least one strain of viable non-pathogenic or attenuated pathogenic Bacteroides and at least one strain of viable non-pathogenic or attenuated pathogenic microorganism.

Claims

1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a purified bacterial mixture of at least two viable bacterial strains selected from the group consisting of Clostridium leptum, Clostridium clostridioforme, Clostridium indolis, Clostridium oroticum, Clostridium scindens, Clostridium sphenoides, and Clostridium symbiosum, wherein the bacterial strains are isolated from a human, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for delivery to the intestine, and wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include at least one of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Bacteroides.

2. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include Lactobacillus.

3. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include Bifidobacterium.

4. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include Bacteroides.

5. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include any of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, or Bacteroides.

6. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for oral administration.

7. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 6, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is formulated as a capsule.

8. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein at least one of the viable bacterial strains is spore-forming.

9. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is effective for treating inflammatory bowel disease.

10. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical composition comprises at least one of Clostridium indolis and Clostridium symbiosum.

11. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 10, wherein the pharmaceutical composition comprises Clostridium indolis and Clostridium symbiosum.

12. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a purified bacterial mixture of at least two live bacterial strains selected from the group consisting of Clostridium indolis, Clostridium scindens, Clostridium symbiosum, and Blautia producta, wherein said pharmaceutical composition is formulated for delivery to the intestine, and wherein said pharmaceutical composition does not include at least one of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Bacteroides.

13. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition comprises all of Clostridium indolis, Clostridium scindens, Clostridium symbiosum, and Blautia producta.

14. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition comprises at least one of Clostridium indolis and Clostridium symbiosum.

15. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition comprises Clostridium indolis and Clostridium symbiosum.

16. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include Lactobacillus.

17. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include Bifidobacterium.

18. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include Bacteroides.

19. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein the pharmaceutical composition does not include any of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, or Bacteroides.

20. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 12, wherein at least one of the viable bacterial strains is spore-forming.

Description

BEST METHOD OF PERFORMING THE INVENTION

(1) In the practice of the invention a synthetic faecal composition of predetermined flora in the form of a liquid or dry powdered culture of Clostridia, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Escherichia coil, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus, which composition does not include antibiotic resistant populations, is prepared as a liquid culture.

(2) Typically the method of the invention is applicable to a patient suffering from a chronic disorder associated with the presence of abnormal microflora in the gastrointestinal tract such as irritable bowel syndrome.

(3) In the practice of the invention a composition of predetermined flora in the form of a liquid culture of Clostridia, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus is ingested by the patient in an amount sufficient to replace and recolonise the dysbiotic flora of the gastrointestinal tract, and reverse the disease process. Alternatively fresh homologous faeces obtained from a disease screened donor are liquefied and mixed with unprocessed bran. The mixture is then homogenised anaerobically under CO.sub.2 cover and infused into the patient per colonoscope.

(4) Cure or remission of symptoms is then monitored subjectively and by assessment of stool frequency or other appropriate criteria.

(5) Using liquid cultures of Clostridia, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus the inventor has achieved total reversal of colitis, irritable bowel syndrome and constipation.

(6) As indicated in the method of treatment aspect of the invention, a preparatory course of appropriate antibiotics may be used. For example, Septrin for chronic yersiniasis, Metronidazole for ulcerative colitis, anti-TB therapy in Crohn's disease, or Vancomycin in chronic Clostridium difficile infestations.

(7) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 % of flora .sup.b Organism(s) 11.8(0.90) Bacteroides fragilis ss. Vulgatus 9.9(0.83) Eubacterium aerofaciens 8.9(0.78) Bacteroides fragilis ss. Thetaiotaomicron 6.6(0.68) Peptostreptococcus productus II 6.0(0.64) Bacteroides fragilis ss. Distasonis 4.4(0.55) Fusobacterium prausnitzii 3.5(0.49) Coprococcus eutactus 3.0(0.45) Eubacterium aerofaciens III 2.8(0.44) Peptostreptococcus productus I 2.7(0.43) Ruminococcus bronii 2.6(0.43) Bifidobacterium adolescentis 2.2(0.39) Gemmiger formicilis, Bifidobacterium longum 2.1(0.38) Eubacterium siraeum 1.8(0.35) Ruminococcus torques 1.7(0.34) Eubacterium rectale III-H 1.6(0.33) Eubacterium rectale IV, Eubacterium eligens 1.5(0.32) Bacteroides eggerthii 1.4(0.31) Clostridium leptum 1.3(0.29) Bacteroides fragilis ss. A 1.2(0.29) Eubacterium biforme 0.91(0.25) Bifidobacterium infantis 0.84(0.24) Eubacterium rectale III-F 0.57(0.20) Coprococcus comes, Bacteroides capillosus 0.50(0.18) Ruminococcus albus, Eubacterium formicigenerans, Eubacterium hallii, Eubacterium ventriosum I, Fusobacterium russii 0.43(0.17) Ruminococcus obeum, Eubacterium rectale II, Clostridium ramosum I, Lactobacillus leichmanii 0.36(0.16) Ruminococcus cailidus, Butyrivibrio crossotus 0.30(0.14) Acidaminococcus fermentans, Eubacterium ventriosum, Bacteroides fragilis ss. fragilis, Bacteroides AR 0.23(0.12) Coprococcus catus, Eubacterium hadrum, Eubacterium cylindroides, Eubacterium ruminantium, Eubacterium CH-1, Staphylococcus epidermidis 0.17(0.10) Peptostreptococcus BL, Eubacterium limosum, Bacteroides praeactus, Bacteroides L, Fusobacterium mortiferum I, Fusobacterium naviforme, Clostridium innocuum, Clostridium ramosum, Propionibacterium acnes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens 0.10(0.08) Ruminococcus AT, Peptococcus AU-1, Eubacterium AG, -AK, -AL, -AL-1, -AN; Bacteroides fragilis ss. ovatus, -ss, d, -ss, f; Bacteroides L-1, L-5; Fusobacterium nucleatum, Fusobacterium mortiferum, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus morbiliorum 0.05(0.05) Peptococcus magnus, Peptococcus G, -AU-2; Streptococcus intermedius, Ruminococcus lactaris, Ruminococcus CO Gemmiger X, Coprococcus BH, -CC; Eubacterium tenue, Eubacterium ramulus, Eubacterium AE, -AG-H, -AG- M, -AJ, -BN-1; Bacteroides clostridiiformis ss. clostridliformis, Bacteroides coagulans, Bacteroides orails, Bacteroides rumlnicola ss. brevis, -ss. ruminicola, Bacteroides splanchnlcus, Desuifomonas pigra, Bacteroides L-4, -N-i; Fusobacterium H, Lactobacillus G, Succinivibrio A .sup.b The percentage of the faecal population (the standard deviation of the estimate is given in parentheses).

(8) The invention will now be further described with reference to the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES

(9) Formulations:

(10) The probiotic therapeutic agents may be prepared in liquid culture anaerobically or aerobically (depending on bacterium cultured) in pure form. Alternatively the probiotics may be cultured on solid media and scraped into a liquid carrier. The resulting product may be spray-dried into a powder form and encapsulated or combined with excipients to be delivered in sachets.

(11) Combinations of Clostridia, Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, and Peptostreptococcus with or without Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria and Eubacteria may be used in varying disorders.

Example No 1-43 Year Old Female

(12) Patient with long standing constipation not responsive to high-dose fibre usage together with prokinetics and standard anti-constipation treatments, was treated with increasing doses of orally administered bacterial mix (mixture composition included Clostridium innocuum, bifermentans, butyricum, together with Bacteroides fragilis, thetaiotaomicron and uniformis. Three strains of Escherichia coli were also included, as was Lactobacillus). This was ingested twice daily in the first two weeks and then daily thereafter. The patient was not given any pre-treatment purgative nor any antibiotics. However, she did take Ranitidine (an acid suppressant) three hours prior to ingestion of the bacterial mix. Two weeks after commencing the treatment the patients constipationwhich would prevent her from defecating for up to four daysreversed to increased frequency with reduction of bloating. Initially, gas production increased and there was burbulance and gurgling in the abdomen but after four weeks of treatment the patient was defecating on a daily basis with no sensation of incomplete emptying and an almost total absence of bloating. Following the treatment she remained virtually normal, defecating on a daily basis with 3 month follow up.

Example No 2-4 Year Old Male

(13) Patient with 3 year history of diagnosis of autism associated with Irritable Bowel Syndrome characterised by constipation alternating with diarrhoea and flatulence, with foul motions, was treated with oral administration of bacterial mix consisting of Clostridium bifermentans, Clostridium innocuum, and Clostridium butyricum in combination with three strains of Escherichia coli, three strains of bacteroides and Peptostreptococcus productus. These were ingested following acid suppression with Ranitidine and were at first taken 3 times daily, reducing to twice daily and then once daily maintenance for eight weeks. The patient's autistic symptoms were reversed quite dramatically with word power increasing from 20 to 200 words (counted by teacher at special autistic school), he began to sleep through the night, and his IBS-type symptoms reverted to near-normality with less constipation, less diarrhoea and less foul flatulence. He developed eye contact, was able to speak sentences up to six words constructed to commands and he began to look, to the untrained eye, as a relatively normal child by about week 10.

Example 3 Male Child, 5 Years Old

(14) Male child, 5 years of age with autism symptoms dating back to age of around 15 monthsbut diagnosed significantly later. The patient presented initially with gastrointestinal symptoms in association with classical autismfor treatment of the bowel symptoms. Although stool test did not indicate any specific pathogen the bowel symptoms resembled those of a chronic infection or adult Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), i.e. intermittent diarrhoea, constipation, cramping, colicky pain, inability to sleep at night, occasional explosive diarrhoea and incontinence. The patient was treated with orthostatic lavage using sodium pico-sulfate followed by water to produce voluminous diarrhoea and to flush out the enteric contents. He was then given 125 mg Vancomycin three times daily orally followed by oral re-colonisation with bacteria at a concentration of 10.sup.9 through to 10.sup.10, suspended in yoghurtof strains which included bacteroides, Escherichia coli, and non pathogenic Clostridiaincluding Clostridium innocuum, bifermentans and ramosum. The response was quite noticeable, in the reversal of the abnormal stool function towards normality. The patient was also able to sleep through the night without any explosive diarrhoea and produced formed stools within five days of commencing the bacterial therapy. While the bacteriotherapy was continued the bowel symptoms were well controlled. Within 3-4 weeks of missing out the treatment for a week or two some of the symptoms would begin to recur. This suggested that the abnormal bacterial flora was suppressed rather than being cured with this treatment in this patient. The unexpected finding however, was a noticeable and marked reversal of symptoms of autism. Whereas previously repetitive movements were present with lack of eye contact, eye contact returned fairly rapidly together with cessation of repetitive movement and progressive increase of word power from around 20 words to around 600 words by the sixth month of treatment. The therapy continues now for more than 12 months with sustained reversal of autism and IBS symptoms.

Example 4 Male Child, 7 Years Old

(15) A seven year old male patient was referred for treatment initially of bowel problems. He had developed autism between age 1 and 2 years characterised by lack of eye contact, repetitive movements, poorly developed cognitive abilities, vocabulary of fewer than 20 words The marked bowel symptoms were characterised by either constipation or large voluminous motions, sometimes diarrhoea and explosive stools. Stool examination was negative.

(16) The patient was given a pre-treatment of Vancomycin 125 mg twice daily and at one week he was given an orthostatic lavage consisting of picosulfate preparation which flushed out his bowel. He was then given twice daily oral bacteriotherapy consisting of cultures containing living probiotics. These included several bacteroides species, Escherichia coli and non-pathogenic Clostridia such as Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium bifermentans and Clostridium innocuum. Within two weeks the bowel symptoms reversed to normal defecation with soft, formed stoolonce or twice per day. Constipation disappeared, eye contact returned over the next six weeks and vocabulary and word use quite dramatically improved, to everyone's surprise. When followed for eight months over 600 words could be counted in the vocabulary with sentences of up to eight words being constructed where previously this was not possible. Some abstract thinking was noted by teachers at the special autism school. Parents in particular noted reduced aggression, greater co-operation, and general increasing ability to develop a more normal relationship with the child. Repetitive action also disappeared.

Example 5 Male Child, 6 Years Old

(17) A male patient aged 6 was referred to the clinic for treatment of chronic diarrhoea and at times incontinence. The child had been autistic since the age of one year and three months. The diagnosis however was delayed. He had slow cognitive development and very limited vocabulary. There was virtually absent eye contact and at times violent and explosive behaviour. The greatest problem with management was that of control of defecation as the child developed a fascination with the stools which would then be spread over furniture and walls. This brought severe pressure upon the family with respect to difficulty with management. Stool test was collected and again was negative for any pathogen. The patient was given Vancomycin 250 mg twice daily for 10 days after which a polyethylene glycol orthostatic lavage achieved a large volume flush of the bowel. He was then given twice daily oral bacteriotherapy in a neutral yogurt as a carrier. Within one week the bowel function returned to virtual normality. However, the behavioural changes were just as rapid in reversing again characterised by fairly rapid reduction in aggressiveness and uncontrollable behaviour, sleeping through the night, increased eye contact, and progressively increased word power. The behaviour of spreading stools also disappeared, more as a behavioural change than learnt phenomenon. The patient was continued on medications for over a year and progressively improved in all parametersat times fluctuating in severity.