LINE OF DUAL MOBILITY JOINT IMPLANT SYSTEMS

Abstract

A line of joint implant systems includes an implant including a cup to be affixed in one of the elements of the considered joint, defining a smooth inner cavity of substantially hemispherical shape. The implant also includes an insert, mobile within the inner cavity of the fixation cup and having its smooth outer surface intended to cooperate by ball-and-socket joint with the inner cavity, and defining in turn a smooth inner cavity of substantially hemispherical shape. The implant further includes a head or ball, solid with a second element of the joint, of spherical shape, intended to be received in the inner cavity of the mobile insert and to form a second ball-and-socket joint. The ratio of the inner diameter of the inner cavity of the fixation cup to the inner diameter of the inner cavity of the mobile insert is constant, whatever the diameter of the selected ball.

Claims

1. A line of joint implant systems, said implant being of the type comprising: a cup configured to be affixed in one of the elements of the considered joint, defining a first smooth inner cavity of substantially hemispherical shape, said first cavity having a first inner diameter; an mobile insert within the inner cavity of the fixation cup and having a smooth outer surface configured to cooperate by ball-and-socket joint with the first inner cavity of the fixation cup, and defining in turn a second smooth inner cavity of substantially hemispherical shape, said second cavity having a second inner diameter; a head or ball of spherical shape having a respective diameter, said head or ball being solid with a second element of the joint, and being configured to be received in the second inner cavity and to form a second ball-and-socket joint, wherein a ratio of the first inner diameter of the first inner cavity to the second inner diameter of the second inner cavity for all the joint implant systems of the line, is constant, regardless of the respective diameter of the head or ball.

2. The line of joint implant systems of claim 1, wherein the ratio is in the range from 1.1 to 3.

3. The line of joint implant systems of claim 1, wherein a thickness of the mobile insert remains constant for a given ball size, regardless of the cup used.

4. The line of joint implant systems of claim 1, wherein the mobile insert comprises, at a level of a base of the mobile insert, a sinking, configured to cooperate with the second element of the joint.

5. The line of joint implant systems of claim 1, wherein the ratio is 1.6.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0023] The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present embodiments will be discussed in detail in the following non-limiting description, in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0024] FIG. 1 is a simplified representation illustrating a dual mobility joint implant according to prior art.

[0025] FIG. 2 is a series of sagittal sections of a line or range of joint implants, mainly illustrating the variation of the thickness, in particular, of the outer cup.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0026] As already indicated, FIG. 1 shows the schematic diagram of a dual mobility joint implant according to the prior state of the art.

[0027] Basically, the implant is first formed of a cap-shaped fixation cup (1) intended to be affixed within a first element of a joint to be fitted with a prosthesis (2), and for example, the acetabular cavity of a patient's pelvis in the context of a hip prosthesis.

[0028] The fixation cup is made of a biocompatible rigid material, and for example made of metal such as one-piece chromium-cobalt, or a chromium-cobalt composite with a trabecular titanium additional thickness, for example, in order to lighten it. The fixation cup defines an inner cavity having a substantially hemispherical shape, defining a first inner articulation surface (51).

[0029] The inner cavity of the fixation cup is intended to receive and to cooperate with a mobile insert (3), also made of biocompatible material, and typically made of high-density polyethylene. The mobile insert (3), also having a substantially hemispherical shape, is thus intended to be received in the inner cavity of the fixation cup (1) to form a first ball-and-socket joint called large articulation. The outer diameter of the mobile insert (3) is thus, to within the clearance, substantially equal to the inner diameter of the inner cavity of the fixation cup (1).

[0030] The mobile insert (3) also comprises an inner cavity, also having a substantially hemispherical shape, and defining a second articulation surface (S2), called small articulation, said inner cavity being intended to receive and to cooperate with a spherical head or ball (4), solid with another element of the prosthesized joint, in the case in point, with a femoral stem (5), inserted into the medullary cavity of the femur of the considered joint.

[0031] Conventionally, the ball (4) is mounted on a Morse taper located at the end of the neck (7) of the femoral stem (5), and this, in known fashion. The femoral stem is typically made of a biocompatible rigid material such as titanium, chromium-cobalt, stainless steel, etc.

[0032] Thereby, a possible double rotating motion according to a double ball-and-socket joint, respectively of the mobile insert (3) with respect to the fixation cup (1) and of the ball (4) with respect to the mobile insert (3) is created.

[0033] Advantageously, and to optimize the range of motion of the joint, and accordingly to limit dislocation phenomena, the base of the mobile insert has a flared shape defining a sinking (6), capable of cooperating with the tapered shape of the neck (7) located at the upper end of the stem (5).

[0034] In known fashion, the dimensions of the fixation cup (1) are inherent, on the one hand, to the considered joint, with as a main object the conservation of the patient's bone stock, and on the other hand, to the stress that it is intended to withstand. Conventionally, concerning a hip joint implant, the outer diameter of the fixation cups of a line typically varies between 44 and 74 millimeters with a 2-millimeter increment.

[0035] The thickness of the fixation cup of prior art implants is constant in a standard line, and thus according to the growth of the outer diameter thereof, the articulation surface (S1), that is, the inner surface area of the inner cavity of the fixation cup, as well as the thickness of the mobile insert, are impacted according to this growth. Due to the increase in the insert thickness, the articulation surface area (S1) increases, and thus, accordingly, the friction torque at this level increases. As a result, the wear of the prosthesis at this level also increases for motions of large amplitude.

[0036] Similarly, two sizes of joint balls (4) are conventionally retained, for a hip prosthesis, respectively with a diameter of 22 and of 28 mm.

[0037] It can be inferred that, as previously indicated, with prior art implants, to take into account the variation of the diameter of the fixation cup (1) and the standard diameter of the ball (4), the size of the mobile insert will vary, and more particularly its outer diameter, in contact with articulation surface S1, thereby increasing its thickness.

[0038] Once the outer diameter of the fixation cup has been determined by the surgeon, according to the state of the patient's acetabulum after milling and to the desired maximum conservation of the bone stock, within a same line of such joint implants, the selection of the insert and accordingly that of the ball can be naturally deduced. More practically, for outer diameters of fixation cups typically in the range from 52 to 74 millimeters, a ball having a 28-millimeter diameter will be preferred to limit the friction torque at the level of surface S1. Once the ball has been selected, there is no further choice concerning the insert, there being only one insert for a ball of determined diameter. However, and given this uniqueness, the selection of the fixation cup in terms of thickness is dictated by the constant ratio desired by the embodiments of the inner diameter of the inner cavity of the fixation cup, in the case in point, of the surface of the joint (S1), to the inner diameter of the mobile implant, and thus, in the case in point, (S2), and typically in the range from 1.1 to 3, advantageously close to 1.6.

[0039] However, for outer diameters of fixation cups smaller than 52 millimeters, a ball having a 22-millimeter diameter will be favored, thus determining the selection of the second insert in the line of implants, having an inner cavity adapted to such a ball diameter. Here again, the selection of the fixation cup in terms of thickness is directly inherent to this insert, still to respect to constant ratio of the embodiments.

[0040] In the described example of hip prosthesis implants, and, the considered line or range only comprises two balls, respectively having a 22- or 28-millimeter diameter, and as a corollary two mobile inserts, depending on the selected ball diameter.

[0041] In other words, taking into account, on the one hand, the selected mobile insert (itself only depending on the diameter of the selected ball) and, on the other hand, the outer diameter of the fixation cup, determined by the acetabular environment observed by the surgeon, the surgeon is capable of selecting the fixation cup best adapted for the desired result while respecting the ratio.

[0042] In the case in point, FIG. 2 shows a series of sagittal section views of different cups/mobile insert pairs, where it can be observed that for a given mobile insert, here adapted for a ball having a 28-millimeter diameter, the thickness of the fixation cup increase with the increase of its outer diameter, to respect the constant character of the ratio of the diameters, respectively the inner diameter of the fixation cup and the inner diameter of the insert. In other words, if the range of balls (4) comprises two sizes, typically having a 22-millimeter diameter and a 28-millimeter diameter for a hip, there are for the line of inserts (3) only two sizes respectively corresponding to the sizes of the balls (4). Practically, one can see in FIG. 2, from left to right, six fixation cups having an outer diameter varying from 52 to 62 millimeters, with a discrete 2-millimeter increment, and accordingly a single mobile insert, adapted for a 28-millimeter ball.

[0043] The situation is strictly the same for fixation cups having an outer diameter varying from 44 to 50 millimeters, with the difference that the ball diameter is here 22 millimeters, and that accordingly, the used insert is adapted to such a ball diameter.

[0044] With the compliance with such a ratio, the present embodiments aim at further significantly decreasing the few prosthetic failures of prior art dual mobility implants. Indeed, the decrease in the starting torque difference in the joint between the small and the large articulation results in: [0045] on the one hand, the fact that when the prosthetic neck of the stem comes into contact with the mobile insert in large ranges of motion, the large articulation requires less energy to be actuated and thus results being less damaging for the sinking of the mobile insert, which is the weak point of dual mobility implants, and [0046] on the other hand, the external surface area of the mobile insert is optimized so that, even in fixation cups having a large outer diameter, the outer surface area of said mobile insert remains constant and limited, thus limiting wear debris capable of causing osteolyses and, thus, prosthetic failures; literature shows that the number of particles emitted in a hip joint is a function, among others, of said outer surface area of the mobile insert.

[0047] Accordingly, due to the decrease in the friction torque, wear phenomena, which inevitably appear despite the use of high-hardness materials, are also decreased, thus causing a debris decrease, and thus optimizing the lifetime of such joint implants.

[0048] The advantages of the presently described embodiments which, in addition to decreasing dislocation phenomena, on the one hand, and debris genesis, on the other hand, enable in economical terms to decrease the number of elements belonging to a line of joint implants, and in logistic terms, to decrease stocks, thus become apparent.

[0049] Further, in terms of patient security, the simplification of the number of joint implants avoids a number of operation errors, such as resulting from labeling errors or errors of size compatibility between the mobile insert and the fixation cup.