BROADBAND OPTICAL NETWORK APPARATUS AND METHOD

Abstract

Methods and apparatus for providing enhanced optical networking service and performance which are particularly advantageous in terms of low cost and use of existing infrastructure, access control techniques, and components. In the exemplary embodiment, current widespread deployment and associated low cost of Ethernet-based systems are leveraged through use of an Ethernet CSMA/CD MAC in the optical domain on a passive optical network (PON) system. Additionally, local networking services are optionally provided to the network units on the PON since each local receiver can receive signals from all other users. An improved symmetric coupler arrangement provides the foregoing functionality at low cost. The improved system architecture also allows for fiber failure protection which is readily implemented at low cost and with minimal modification.

Claims

1-38. (canceled)

39. A computerized method of adjusting an optical power of an optical network unit (ONU) of a passive optical network, the computerized method comprising: accessing data descriptive of at least an expected received power level corresponding to an optical communications path between the ONU and a first optical coupler of the passive optical network; calculating a transmitter power level of the ONU based at least on the accessed data descriptive of at least the expected received power level; and adjusting a current transmitter power level to the calculated transmitter power level.

40. The computerized method of claim 39, further comprising: transmitting a self-ranging message to the first optical coupler through the path; and receiving the self-ranging message from a second optical coupler; and determining a round-trip distance of an optical communications path through the first optical coupler and the second optical coupler, the determining the round-trip distance comprising measuring: (i) a transmit time corresponding to the transmitting of the self-ranging message to the first optical coupler and (ii) a receipt time of the self-ranging message from the second optical coupler; wherein the calculating of the transmitter power level of the ONU is directly proportional to the determined round-trip distance.

41. The computerized method of claim 39, further comprising determining whether a signal power received at the ONU correlates with the expected received power level, the correlation being based at least on: (i) a difference of values between the signal power received at the ONU and the expected received power level and (ii) a predetermined error range.

42. The computerized method of claim 41, further comprising, when the difference of values falls outside of the predetermined error range: readjusting, at least once, the current transmitter power level of the ONU; and comparing a difference of values between (i) a readjusted signal power received at the ONU and (ii) the expected received power level.

43. The computerized method of claim 42, further comprising, when the difference of values between (i) the readjusted signal power received at the ONU and (ii) the expected received power level falls outside of the predetermined error range, causing the ONU to enter a non-operational state, the non-operational state for implementing a corrective action.

44. The computerized method of claim 41, further comprising, when the difference of values falls inside the predetermined error range, causing the ONU to enter an operational state.

45. The computerized method of claim 39, wherein the accessing of the data further comprises accessing information descriptive of at least: (i) a distance between the ONU and the first optical coupler and (ii) the current transmitter power level of the ONU.

46. An optical network unit (ONU) comprising: at least one optical communications interface configured to perform data communication with (i) an optical access point of a passive optical network and (ii) an optical coupler of the passive optical network; a transmitter comprising a transmitter power associated therewith; processor apparatus in data communication with the at least one optical communications interface; and a non-transitory computer-readable storage apparatus in data communication with the processor apparatus and having at least one computer program, the least one computer program comprising a plurality of instructions configured to, when executed by the processor apparatus, cause the ONU to: perform an initialization comprising: (i) transmission of a message to the optical coupler, (ii) receipt of a message from the optical coupler at the ONU, and (iii) determination of a distance to the optical coupler based at least on measurements of a time taken for the transmission to the optical coupler and a time taken for the return and receipt by the ONU; access a data resource file comprising at least an expected power level; and adjust the transmitter power level of the ONU based at least on the expected power level and the determined distance to the optical coupler.

47. The optical network unit of claim 46, wherein the plurality of instructions are further configured to, when executed by the processor apparatus, cause the ONU to compare a received power level to the expected power level; wherein the ONU is configured to, responsive to a value derived from the comparison between the received power level and the expected power level within a predetermined error, enter an operational state; and wherein the ONU is further configured to, responsive to the value derived from the comparison between the received power level and the expected power level being outside the predetermined error, readjust the transmitter power level.

48. The optical network unit of claim 47, wherein the ONU is further configured to, when the readjustment of the transmitter power occurs: responsive to a value derived from a comparison between another received power level and the expected power level within the predetermined error, enter the operational state; and responsive to the value derived from the comparison between other received power level and the expected power level being outside the predetermined error, enter a non-operational state.

49. The optical network unit of claim 48, wherein the entrance to the non-operational state comprises an institution of a corrective action, the corrective action comprising one or more of (i) a log of the non-operational state and/or (ii) a report of the non-operational state.

50. The optical network unit of claim 46, wherein the ONU is configured to perform a calibration prior to power-up of the ONU, the calibration comprising: determination of at least the expected power level, where the expected power level corresponds to an optical communications path between the ONU and the optical coupler; and storage of information related to at least the expected power level within the data resource file.

51. The optical network unit of claim 46, wherein the at least one optical communications interface comprises at least: a first optical communications interface configured to receive digital data from the optical access point; and a second optical communications interface configured to transmit digital data from the ONU.

52. The optical network unit of claim 51, wherein the passive optical network is configured to allow redirection of the digital data transmitted from the ONU to a second ONU via a second optical coupler of the passive optical network.

53. An optical network comprising: an optical line terminal (OLT) configured to exchange data with a switched network; a plurality of optical couplers in data communication with the OLT; and an optical network unit (ONU), the ONU configured to: access data descriptive of at least an expected received power level corresponding to an optical communications pathway between the ONU and the plurality of optical couplers; determine a transmitter power level of the ONU based at least on the data descriptive of at least the expected received power level; adjust a current transmitter power level of the ONU based on a comparison of the current transmitter power level with the determined transmitter power level; responsive to a comparison between the adjusted transmitter power level and the expected power level within a predetermined error, enter an operational state; and responsive to the comparison between the adjusted transmitter power level and the expected power level outside the predetermined error, readjust the transmitter power level.

54. The optical network of claim 53, wherein the plurality of optical couplers comprises at least a P×N star coupler.

55. The optical network of claim 53, wherein the ONU is configured to receive one or more of: video traffic signals and/or data traffic signals.

56. The optical network of claim 55, wherein the OLT is configured to transmit the video traffic signals and/or the data traffic signals.

57. The optical network of claim 53, wherein the determined transmitter power level is determined from a self-ranging process, the self-ranging process comprising a transmission of a message from the ONU to itself via the plurality of optical couplers.

58. The optical network of claim 53, wherein: the plurality of optical couplers comprises a first and a second optical coupler; the ONU comprises a first ONU configured to communicate data with a second ONU; and the entrance to the operational state is configured to enable the first ONU and the second ONU to communicate data with each other via optical pathways, the optical pathways being configured to provide optical signal communication between the first and the second optical couplers.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0029] The features, objectives, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:

[0030] FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a typical passive optical network (e.g., APON or EPON) architecture according to the prior art.

[0031] FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of one exemplary embodiment of the optical network architecture according to the present invention.

[0032] FIG. 2a is a graphical representation illustrating the operation of a 2×2 directional coupler according to the prior art.

[0033] FIG. 3 is block diagram illustrating a first exemplary embodiment of an OLT functional architecture according to the present invention.

[0034] FIG. 4 is block diagram illustrating a first exemplary embodiment of an ONU functional architecture according to the present invention.

[0035] FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of a first exemplary embodiment of the optical network architecture of the invention, illustrating downstream traffic flow.

[0036] FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram of the optical network architecture of FIG. 5, illustrating upstream traffic flow.

[0037] FIG. 6a is a logical flow diagram illustrating an exemplary method for determining when an ONU can transmit onto the network.

[0038] FIG. 7a is a logical flow diagram illustrating one exemplary embodiment of the calibration methodology according to the present invention.

[0039] FIG. 7b is a logical flow diagram illustrating one exemplary embodiment of the power balancing methodology according to the present invention.

[0040] FIG. 8 is a functional block diagram of the optical network architecture of FIG. 5, illustrating the operation of local networking services according to the present invention.

[0041] FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram of the optical network architecture of FIG. 5, illustrating an exemplary arrangement for a 1:1 protection switch (downstream traffic only) according to the present invention.

[0042] FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram of the protection switch arrangement of FIG. 9, except with upstream traffic.

[0043] FIG. 11 is a functional block diagram of the protection switch arrangement of FIGS. 9 and 10, illustrating the operation of local networking in the case of a protection switch.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0044] Reference is now made to the drawings wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.

[0045] It is noted that while the following description is cast primarily in terms of an exemplary Ethernet-based CSMA/CD system, other access techniques and protocols may be used in conjunction with or in place of the particular techniques described herein. Accordingly, the following discussion of the Ethernet CSMA/CD approach is merely exemplary of the broader concepts.

[0046] As used herein, the terms “splitting” and “split” refer generally to the process of dividing or reducing a signal into two or more constituent components, and in no way is limited to an even division into two equal components.

[0047] As used herein, the term “node” refers to any functional entity associated with a network, such as for example an OLT or ONU, whether physically discrete or distributed across multiple locations.

Overview

[0048] The present invention includes methods and apparatus for providing enhanced optical networking service and performance which are particularly advantageous in terms of low cost and use of existing infrastructure and systems.

[0049] In the exemplary embodiment, the invention leverages the current widespread deployment and associated low cost of Ethernet-based systems to provide the aforementioned benefits. Specifically, an Ethernet CSMA/CD MAC is advantageously implemented in the optical domain on a conventional PON system. Additionally, local networking services can be provided to all the network units (ONUs) on the network since each local receiver can receive signals from all other users. A novel symmetric coupler arrangement provides this functionality at low cost.

[0050] Finally, by taking full advantage of the aforementioned symmetrical structure of the system architecture, the system can support feeder-fiber protection with minimum cost. Such protection strategy greatly improves the service and access network availability and yet maintains the low-cost characteristic of the conventional PON.

Apparatus and Methods

[0051] Referring now to FIGS. 2-11, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is described in detail. In this embodiment, a B-PON architecture is disclosed that enables a simplified (e.g., CSMA/CD) MAC to be implemented in the optical domain such that no other complicated MAC protocol is required. As a result, standard Ethernet devices can advantageously be used with only minor optical and electronic adaptation. Another significant advantage of this approach is that the existing PON architectures require very little change, and the number of extra components required is minimum. The utilization of specially adapted optical couplers (e.g., two 2×N optical star couplers in the illustrated embodiment) are instrumental in providing these features.

[0052] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary network architecture according to the invention. For clarity, the EMS, the service provider's core networks, and the end users are not shown. In this architecture 200, two effectively parallel optical couplers 202, 204 are provided between the OLT 300 (FIG. 3) and the plurality of ONUs 400 (FIG. 4) which form the network. The respective optical couplers 202, 204 are dedicated to corresponding or symmetrical portions of the network; i.e., the “data” portion 210 and the video portion 212. In the present embodiment, the data portion 210 is based upon the Ethernet standard as previously discussed, thereby comprising an Ethernet passive optical network (EPON). By providing both data and other (e.g., video) services in one PON, the architecture 200 of FIG. 2 is considered “converged” or multi-functional.

[0053] FIG. 2a shows an exemplary embodiment of a 2×2 directional coupler 250 that can be naturally generalized to a P×N star coupler. As is well known in the optical arts, a star coupler can be used to split and combine signals in an optical network. It has the property that the power from each input is equally divided among all the outputs. The minimum theoretical insertion loss in dB of a P×N star coupler is given by Eqn. 1:

L.sub.P×N=10 log.sub.10(max{P, N})   (Eqn. 1)

[0054] It is noted that optical star couplers are reciprocal devices, that is, they work exactly the same way if their inputs and outputs are reversed.

[0055] The optical line terminal (OLT) 300 in the optical network 200 is typically connected to the switched networks via standardized interfaces. At the distribution side, it presents optical accesses according to the agreed requirements, in terms of bit rate, power budget, etc. FIG. 3 shows an exemplary OLT architecture according to the present invention. In this configuration, the OLT 300 is connected to a telephony switch using an industry standard interface 302. In addition, the OLT is connected via a corresponding interface 304 to an IP router for data delivery. Finally, the OLT is connected via an interface 06 to video content suppliers to provide IP streaming video or RF video services. At the distribution side 308, the OLT 300 has two interfaces. The first interface 310 is for downstream and upstream Ethernet traffic, and the second interface 312 is for downstream video traffic only. At the first interface 310, Ethernet traffic is broadcast by the OLT 300 through the first 2 ×N star coupler (not shown) and extracted by the appropriate destination ONU based on the MAC address. The upstream traffic from various ONUs is received by the OLT 300 at the same interface 310. Due to the broadcasting nature in the downstream direction and the contention-based media access control in the upstream direction (described in greater detail subsequently herein), the Ethernet interface 310 at the OLT 300 operates in full-duplex mode (no CSMA/CD). Finally, video traffic is broadcast by the OLT through the second interface 312 and associated 2×N star coupler to the ONUs that are connected to customer's analog and/or digital TV receiving devices such as set-top boxes, etc. In addition to the above, the OLT 300 is also responsible for providing connections (or mapping) between the service port function (such as an IP router interface) and the ODN interface (such as the Ethernet interface to the PON). Techniques for providing such mapping are well known to those of skill in the art, and accordingly are not discussed in detail herein.

[0056] Referring now to FIG. 4, the exemplary ONU architecture of the invention is described in detail. The ONU 400 provides the interface between the customer and the PON. The primary function of ONU is to receive traffic in optical format and convert it to the customer's desired format. An ONU is also responsible for transmitting upstream customer traffic to the OLT 300. The ONU 400 has three optical distribution network interfaces 402, 404, 406. Through the first interface 402, the ONU connects to an input port of the aforementioned first (star) coupler and is responsible for receiving downstream Ethernet traffic from the OLT as well as transmitting upstream Ethernet traffic to the OLT 300 (EPON). For this interface 402, 1550 nm and 1310 nm wavelengths are used in the downstream and upstream directions, respectively, although it will be recognized that other wavelengths may be used for either or both downstream and upstream directions if desired consistent with the present invention. Note that the upstream Ethernet traffic of the illustrated embodiment carries data and voice as well as other signals such as video-on-demand and channel change requests. The OLT 300 acts as the coordinator between the Ethernet and video portions of the network (i.e., EPON and VPON, respectively, described subsequently herein). Through the second interface 404, the ONU 400 connects to an input port of the second star coupler and is responsible for receiving downstream video traffic from the OLT 300 (VPON). A 1550 nm wavelength is used in the present embodiment in the downstream direction for this interface. The third interface 406 of the ONU 400 provides the return path for upstream Ethernet traffic such that the CSMA/CD protocol can be implemented. In addition, it enables local networking services among the various ONUs. The operating wavelength for this interface is the same as that of the upstream traffic (1310 nm), albeit in the opposite direction. The downstream video traffic and the redirected upstream traffic (now traveling downstream) both pass through the second star coupler 204 and travel along the same distribution fiber. However, they operate at different wavelengths (1550 nm and 1310 nm, respectively). In addition to performing optoelectronic conversion, an ONU 400 also offers Layer 2 (or even Layer 3 ) switching capability, which allows customer traffic to be switched internally at the ONU 400. As in the case of ATM PON, an ONU may also include a number of other components (such as user port functions 420, 422) in addition to the ODN interface(s) 402, 404, 406. The implementation details of such other components are well known to those of ordinary skill, and accordingly not described further herein.

[0057] FIG. 5 shows that in the downstream direction, the optical signals are broadcast by two different transmitters at the OLT 300 (e.g., located at the CO) to all the ONUs 400 by the first and the second couplers 202, 204 that are located within the first and second PONs 210, 212, respectively. As previously referenced herein, the difference between these two network portions 210, 212 in the present embodiment is that the first PON 210 carries data, voice, and IP streaming video (operating wavelength 1480-1580 nm), while the second PON 212 carries video (operating wavelength 1480-1580 nm). The first PON is an Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) where all data, voice, and IP video are encapsulated in Ethernet frames. The second PON 212 is a video passive optical network (VPON) where, inter alia, standard analog video content can be delivered along with digital CATV over the RF spectrum. As far as downstream traffic (from central office to user) is concerned, the architecture according to the embodiment of FIGS. 2-5 is effectively identical to a co-located EPON/VPON combination in which both networks have the same physical layout. It should be noted that the two feeder fibers can also be routed through diverse paths so that they do not get fiber cut at the same time.

[0058] In the upstream direction, instead of using a time-division multiple access (TDMA) technique as in the prior art, the present embodiment uses a contention-based media access control protocol CSMA/CD to manage the optical channel sharing among multiple ONUs 400. One of the four basic elements of Ethernet is the media access control (MAC) protocol; i.e., the carrier sense multiple access/collision detection (CSMA/CD) protocol. This protocol is designed to provide fair access to the shared channel so that all users are provided an opportunity to access the network and no user is locked out due to one or more other users “hogging” the channel. After every packet transmission, all users use the CSMA/CD protocol to determine which user gets access to the Ethernet channel next. It should be noted that CSMA/CD is only used in half-duplex mode of Ethernet operation. Half-duplex in the present context simply means that only one user can send upstream data over the Ethernet channel at any given time.

[0059] As shown in FIG. 6, all of the ONUs 400 are in the same collision domain 606 and follow the same media access control rules. Being in the same collision domain means they are all part of the signal timing domain in which if two or more devices transmit at the same time, a collision will occur. The media access control rules refer to the CSMA/CD protocol. Note that the OLT 300 is not part of the collision domain in this embodiment, and therefore does not use CSMA/CD protocol even though it is directly connected (not through an Ethernet switching hub) to the rest of the network. The reason for not including OLT 300 in the collision domain of this embodiment is that the ONUs 400 can perform upstream bandwidth arbitration by utilizing CSMA/CD MAC entirely among themselves. Adding the OLT 300 to the collision domain has no additional value in this context. In fact, since OLT 300 is the only source for downstream traffic, there is no need for downstream bandwidth arbitration in the present embodiment. The OLT simply broadcasts to all the ONUs whenever it wants to.

[0060] From the above discussion, it is clear that while the architecture according to the present invention is generally similar to an Ethernet network, salient distinguishing features do exist. One such difference between an Ethernet architecture and that of the present embodiment is that CSMA/CD MAC of the present embodiment is only used in the upstream direction. In addition, the exact implementations (such as carrier detection) are different due to architectural differences between the two systems.

[0061] As in an Ethernet network, an ONU 400 must obey the following when transmission of data is desired: i) the ONU 400 must know when it can transmit; and ii) it must be able to detect and respond to a collision.

[0062] To determine when a given ONU 400 may transmit, the following methodology 650 is applied (referring to FIG. 6a).

[0063] If there is no carrier (step 652) and the period of no carrier has continued for an amount of time that equals or exceeds the inter-frame gap (IFG) per step 654, then the frame is transmitted immediately (step 656). Note that for an ONU, no carrier means that there is no optical signal received by its local receiver.

[0064] If there is carrier (i.e. there is optical signal) per step 652, the ONU 400 will continue to listen until the carrier becomes absent. As soon as the carrier becomes absent (step 658), the ONU may begin the process of transmitting a frame, which includes waiting for the inter-frame gap as previously described.

[0065] If a collision is detected during the transmission (step 660), the ONU will continue to transmit a collision enforcement jam signal (step 662). Note that for an ONU, a collision is signaled by a difference between the beginning of the received data and the data transmitted. The difference may be due to errors caused by colliding transmissions, or reception of an earlier transmission from another ONU, or a bit error on the channel. After sending the jam signal, the ONU goes through the backoff process (step 664). The operation and implementation of the backoff algorithm are well known to those of ordinary skill, and accordingly not described further herein.

[0066] Once an ONU 400 has transmitted a predetermined quantity of data (e.g., 512 bits of a frame for 100 Mbps assumed) without a collision (step 666), the ONU is considered to have acquired the channel (step 668). After channel acquisition, the ONU simply continues the transmission until the entire frame is transmitted (step 670).

[0067] It should be noted that although analogs of the above methodology have generally been used in Ethernet networks for many years, the present invention advantageously adapts this methodology to conventional passive optical networks, and specifically the architectures disclosed herein, for the first time.

[0068] In terms of required bandwidth, Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps) provides adequate bandwidth for contemplated applications occurring in the immediate future. Gigabit Ethernet (1000 Mbps, or 1 Gbps) and even more capable technologies developed subsequently hereto may be optionally utilized in applications where additional bandwidth is required. Hence, the present invention can advantageously be readily adapted to (i) the bandwidth needs of the particular application; and (ii) accommodate new higher data rate technologies, without altering the fundamental architecture disclosed herein.

[0069] Ethernet standards provide configuration guidelines to ensure that the important Ethernet timing requirements are met, so that the MAC protocol will function correctly. One of the requirements for Fast Ethernet configuration is that fiber segments must be less than or equal to 412 meters in length. Similarly, for Gigabit Ethernet, segment lengths are limited to 316 meters in order to meet the bit-timing budget of the system. These rules are implemented when configuring the ONU(s) 400, in addition to other signal transmission considerations. That is, in the exemplary application of the invention employing Fast Ethernet, the distance between one ONU 400 to another should be less than 412 m, and similarly in Gigabit applications, the ONU-ONU distance should be maintained less than 316 m.

[0070] ITU Std. G.983.1 requires that the maximum range (i.e., distances between each ONU and the OLT) of the PON is at least 20 km. While this is certainly a relatively easy task for Fast Ethernet when operated in full-duplex mode (assuming single-mode fiber optic cable is employed), it is not necessarily as easy when Gigabit Ethernet is utilized, as the standard specifies that a full-duplex 1000BASE-LX segment can reach as far as 5000 meters (with single-mode fiber optic cable). Nevertheless, the IEEE 802.3ah Ethernet in the First Mile (EFM) Task Force is as of the present date defining a ≧10 km range with single single-mode fiber (SMF) as a standard for “Point to Point over Fiber”, and this standard can be used as a reference for the present embodiment. In addition, vendors have developed “extended reach” versions of 1000BASE-LX single-mode interfaces that can send signals over distances of 70-100 km or more. Therefore, in practice, a 20 km maximum range is not problematic for the EPON 210 operating at Gigabit Ethernet speed. It should be noted that although the EPON portion 210 of the system 200 according to the present invention does not operate in full-duplex mode in a precise manner, at least the OLT 300 operates in full-duplex mode. In addition, since OLT 300 is not part of the collision domain, the distances between each ONU 400 and the OLT do not have to be limited by the Ethernet timing requirements. As a result, distances allowed by full-duplex mode can be used between each ONU and the OLT.

[0071] An example downstream optical power budget calculation for the EPON 210 of the illustrated embodiment is shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Mean loss Available Mean loss Quantity or sub-total power level Items per unit (dB) length (dB) (dBm) Mean launched power −2.0 Splitter insertion loss −14.5 1 −14.5 −16.5 ( 1/16) Splitter excess loss −1.0 1 −1.0 −17.5 Splitter uniformity −3.0 1 −3.0 −20.5 Splitter polarization −0.6 1 −0.6 −21.1 dependent loss Fiber optic cable at 1550 nm −0.2 10 −2.0 −23.1 (dB/km) Miscellaneous splices −2.0 1 −2.0 −25.1 Total optical loss −23.1 Optical power level at the −25.1 receiver Minimum receiver −30.00 sensitivity (dBm)

[0072] An example upstream optical power budget calculation for the EPON 210 is shown in Table 2 below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Mean Quantity Mean loss Available loss per or sub-total power level Items unit (dB) length (dB) (dBm) Mean launched power −2.0 Splitter insertion loss −3.6 1 −3.6 −5.6 (½) Splitter excess loss −0.15 1 −0.15 −5.75 Splitter uniformity −0.8 1 −0.8 −6.55 Splitter polarization −0.12 1 −0.12 −6.67 dependent loss Fiber optic cable at −0.35 10 −3.5 −10.17 1310 nm (dB/km) Miscellaneous splices −2.0 1 −2.0 −12.17 Total optical loss −10.17 Optical power level at −12.17 the receiver Minimum receiver −30.00 sensitivity (dBm) Note that in the example of Table 2, a splitting ratio of 50/50 is used. A different splitting ratio (e.g. 25/75) can be used such that a different portion of optical power goes to the OLT.

[0073] An example optical power budget calculation for the return path of the system 200 is shown in Table 3 below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Mean loss Available Mean loss per Quantity or sub-total power level Items unit (dB) length (dB) (dBm) Mean launched power −2.0 1.sup.st splitter insertion loss −3.6 1 −3.6 −5.6 (½) 1.sup.st splitter excess loss −0.15 1 −0.15 −5.75 1.sup.st splitter uniformity −0.8 1 −0.8 −6.55 1.sup.st splitter polarization −0.12 1 −0.12 −6.67 dependent loss 2.sup.nd splitter insertion loss −14.5 1 −14.5 −21.17 (1/16) 2.sup.nd splitter excess loss −1.0 1 −1.0 −22.17 2.sup.nd splitter uniformity −3.0 1 −3.0 −25.17 2.sup.nd splitter polarization −0.6 1 −0.6 −25.77 dependent loss Fiber optic cable at 1310 nm −0.35 2 −0.7 −26.47 (dB/km) Miscellaneous splices −2.0 1 −2.0 −28.47 Total optical loss −26.47 Optical power level at −28.47 the receiver Minimum receiver −30.00 sensitivity (dBm)
FIGS. 7a-7b illustrate an exemplary methodology for power balancing according to the invention. As previously described, the near-far problem is caused by unequal distances between the central office (CO) and various ONUs. The longer the distance, the lower the power level received at the OLT 300. To overcome this problem, the power levels from all the ONUs 400 shall be equalized to a pre-defined value at the input ports of the first star coupler. To achieve this goal, the ONU power level differences due to varying distances as seen by the first coupler 202 need to be compensated.

[0074] The power balancing methodology according to the present embodiment first performs a calibration process 700 (FIG. 7a) to establish an accessible resource (e.g., look-up table) per step 704 that contains at least three types of information: (a) the ONU-to-coupler distance, (b) the ONU transmitter power level, and (c) the expected received power from the return path. In the exemplary look-up table, this information may comprise respective columns or rows. The resource is designed to ensure that for a given distance, there is a corresponding transmitter power level that will lead to equalized power levels from all the ONUs 400 at the input ports of the first (star) coupler. The resource information is stored in an appropriate storage device (not shown) per step 706 of FIG. 7a.

[0075] When a new ONU 400 is powered on, as part of its initialization routine, it sends a message (i.e., “self-ranging” message) to itself per step 732 of FIG. 7b through the signal return path and measures the round trip time which directly relates to the distance between the ONU 400 and the coupler(s) 202, 204.

[0076] Once the distance between the ONU 400 and the star coupler 202, 204 is known, the resource of FIG. 7a is accessed (step 734) to determine the appropriate transmitter power level, and the ONU transmitter power level adjusted accordingly per step 736.

[0077] Next, per step 738, the power received from the return path is measured and compared with the expected value. If these values match (within a determined error band), the ONU transmitter power level is considered balanced, and the ONU enters the operational state (step 740). If the values do not match in step 738 due to reasons other than interferences from other ONUs, the ONU transmitter power is re-adjusted in the appropriate direction (as determined by the sign of the difference of the comparison of step 738) for one or more additional times. If the compared values still do not match after such re-adjustment(s), the ONU remains in the non-operational state and the failure is logged, reported , and/or other corrective action instituted.

[0078] FIG. 8 illustrates that the architecture according to the present embodiment can be easily extended to provide “local” networking services. As used herein, local network services includes, for example, so-called local area networks (LAN), intranets, secure (“trusted”) networks, and virtual private networks (VPN). Such networking services may be desirable, for example, in scenarios where the use of intranet is essential, such as in business offices or other enterprises, community networking, and premises networking cases. The operation of the local network 800 of the embodiment of FIG. 8 is similar to an Ethernet LAN. When one ONU 400 needs to communicate to another ONU, it follows the same CSMA/CD rules as described previously herein. However, the destination address of the receiving ONU is a local one. It should be noted that since the same transmitter is used for both upstream traffic and local traffic, the total upstream bandwidth can be shared between the upstream traffic and the local traffic if local networking service were selected.

[0079] Referring now to FIGS. 9 and 10, the feeder-fiber protection aspects of the invention are described in detail. Specifically, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, the symmetric system architecture 200 of the present invention can be utilized to provide protection switching in case of feeder-fiber failure. As is well known in the fiber-optic communications arts, an unprotected feeder-fiber is a highly vulnerable part of a PON system. A fiber cut may cause loss of service to all users for significant amount of time (on the order of hours or even days). Therefore, it is highly desirable that any PON architecture have some redundancy strategy in place. The redundancy strategy according to the embodiment of FIG. 2 (as detailed in FIGS. 9 and 10) is based on 1:1 (one-to-one) protection, although it will be recognized that other schemes of protection may be employed. In 1:1 protection, two fibers are used between the source and the destination. Traffic is transmitted over only one fiber at a time (normally referred to as the working fiber). If the working fiber is cut, the source and destination both switch over to the remaining (i.e., protection) fiber. One of the main advantages of 1:1 over other techniques such as “1+1” protection is that under normal operation, the protection fiber can be used to transmit lower-priority traffic. This lower-priority service will be discontinued if the working fiber is cut.

[0080] As shown in FIG. 9 and FIG. 10, the first feeder-fiber 902 connecting the OLT 300 and the first coupler 202 is considered as the working fiber, and the second feeder-fiber 904 connecting the OLT 300 and the second coupler 204 is considered as the protection fiber. Under normal conditions, the system operates as previously described with respect to FIGS. 2-8. However, when a fiber-cut 907 occurs on the working fiber 902, the OLT 300 and the ONU(s) 400 will both detect the cut and switch to the protection fiber 904, and no automatic protection switching (APS) protocol is required. To enable the protection switch capability, a small number of devices need to be added to the existing architecture 200. Specifically, on the OLT side, a simple optical switch (not shown) can be utilized such that the signal can be switched from the working fiber 902 to the protection fiber 904. On the ONU side, the receiver originally considered (for receiving local traffic only) now need to be replaced by or modified with a transceiver that is the same type as those being used for the ONU-OLT communication. In order to operate under both normal and failure conditions, the two transceivers at the ONU 400 must be capable of receiving optical signals properly in both 1310 nm and 1550 nm wavelength ranges, respectively, which is readily accomplished using existing and well known optical technology.

[0081] Thus, a PON system that provides 1:1 feeder-fiber protection capability is created with very minimal modification and cost. In fact, if service and access network availability is the primary concern, this functionality can be implemented in the PON at manufacture/installation.

[0082] It should also be noted that in addition to feeder fiber failure, the distribution fiber(s) 920 could also fail. However, the impact of distribution fiber failure is much smaller, as such failures only affect the connected ONU, and therefore only a limited number of users as compared to the feeder fiber. There is a possibility that an ONU 400 will perform a fiber switch due to a distribution fiber failure (as opposed to the feeder failure previously described). In this case, switching over to the protection fiber will not restore the traffic, since the OLT 300 is still operating on the working fiber. To handle this situation, the ONU of the present embodiment is optionally configured to simply switch back to the working fiber, and at the same time, the OLT can declare that the affected ONU is out of service after a predetermined time period of lost communication with the ONU.

[0083] As far as local networking services during a feeder fiber failure are concerned, the ONUs 400 can still communicate with each other as if no protection switch has occurred. However, the signal path 1100 under this circumstance (FIG. 11) is different than that previously shown in FIG. 8.

[0084] It will be further recognized that while the foregoing discussion is cast in terms of a single PON 200 having an OLT 300, two couplers 202, 204, and a plurality of ONUs 400, the present invention may be adapted to larger or different architectures wherein, for example, multiple PONs 200 are interconnected, or additional OLTs and/or couplers are utilized.

[0085] It should be noted that although in the aforementioned description Ethernet CSMA/CD MAC was used to perform access arbitration in the upstream direction, other techniques (such as TDMA) can be used as well provided certain pluggable circuit pack units at both the OLT and the ONUs are replaced by appropriate units that support TDMA functionalities. In addition, a different set of software components may be required at both the OLT and the ONUs, such software being readily implemented by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.

[0086] Furthermore, it will be recognized that the architecture of the present invention advantageously provides economies in terms of component usage and configuration. Specifically, it is noted that under the prior art, two separate or “stand alone” optical networks (i.e., a VPON and EPON configured as separate networks) will require an effectively equivalent number of components to the improved “connected” architecture of the present invention. Hence, the present invention affords the aforementioned enhanced functionality (i.e., collision detection, protection switch, and local networking services) without requiring additional components of any significance.

[0087] Furthermore, the architecture of the present invention affords enhanced cost efficiency over the prior art, in that existing, lower cost “off-the-shelf” CSMA/CD and related components can be used as opposed to the more costly and often more complex components used for upstream arbitration in such prior art systems; e.g., a TDMA system requiring complex synchronization and related techniques.

[0088] It will be recognized that while certain aspects of the invention are described in terms of a specific sequence of steps of a method, these descriptions are only illustrative of the broader methods of the invention, and may be modified as required by the particular application. Certain steps may be rendered unnecessary or optional under certain circumstances. Additionally, certain steps or functionality may be added to the disclosed embodiments, or the order of performance of two or more steps permuted. All such variations are considered encompassed within the invention disclosed and claimed herein.

[0089] While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. The foregoing description is of the best mode presently contemplated of carrying out the invention. This description is in no way meant to be limiting, but rather should be taken as illustrative of the general principles of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.