Oil solution for carbon fiber precursors and carbon fiber precursor

Abstract

An oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor is provided that contains a base component, a cationic surfactant, and a nonionic surfactant, wherein the cationic surfactant is a specific nitrogen-containing compound.

Claims

1. An oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor, comprising a base component, a cationic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant, and an optional organic polybasic acid salt, wherein the cationic surfactant is a compound represented by Chemical Formula 1: ##STR00003## in Chemical Formula 1, wherein R.sup.1 is selected from the group consisting of an alkyl and an alkenyl group having 7 to 18 carbon atoms, wherein R.sup.2 is selected from the group consisting of a hydroxyethyl group, a hydroxypropyl group, and a propyl group, wherein R.sup.3 is selected from the group consisting of a methyl and an ethyl group, and wherein Y.sup. is selected from the group consisting of a methylsulfate group, an ethylsulfate group, and an organic group represented by Chemical Formula 2: ##STR00004## in Chemical Formula 2, wherein R.sup.4, R.sup.5 is selected from the group consisting of a methyl and an ethyl group, wherein the base component is an amino-modified silicone that is liquid at 25 C. and the oil agent comprises 50 to 95% by mass of the base component, 0.01 to 30% by mass of the cationic surfactant, 3 to 45% by mass of the nonionic surfactant and 15% by mass or less of the optional organic polybasic acid salt such that the total content of the base component, the cationic surfactant, the nonionic surfactant, and the optional polybasic acid salt is 100% by mass, and wherein the nonionic surfactant is a compound obtained by addition reaction of ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide to an organic alcohol at a ratio of 1 to 50 mol ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide with 1 mol of an organic alcohol having 4 to 40 carbon atoms.

2. The oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor according to claim 1, wherein the cationic surfactant is at least one selected from a compound represented by Chemical Formula 1 in which Y.sup. is a methylsulfate group and a compound represented by Chemical Formula 1 in which Y.sup. is an ethylsulfate group.

3. The oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor according to claim 1, wherein the organic polybasic acid salt is present.

4. The oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor according to claim 3, wherein the organic polybasic acid salt is an alkali metal salt or amine salt of an organic polybasic acid.

5. A carbon fiber precursor comprising the oil agent of claim 1.

Description

EXAMPLES

(1) Although Examples and the like will be mentioned hereinafter to make the constitution and the effect of the present invention more specific, the present invention is not limited to these Examples. In the following Examples and Comparative Examples, parts means parts by mass and % means % by mass.

(2) Test Section 1 (Provision of Base Components)

(3) The following base components were provided.

(4) A-1: Amino-modified polyorganosiloxane in which the kinematic viscosity at 25 C. is 650 mm.sup.2/S, and the amino equivalent is 1800 g/mol (trade name KF-880 produced by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.)

(5) A-2: Amino-modified polyorganosiloxane in which the kinematic viscosity at 25 C. is 90 mm.sup.2/S, and the amino equivalent is 2200 g/mol (trade name KF-8012 produced by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.)

(6) A-3: Amino-modified polyorganosiloxane in which the kinematic viscosity at 25 C. is 450 mm.sup.2/S, and the amino equivalent is 5700 g/mol (trade name KF-8008 produced by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.)

(7) A-4: Amino-modified polyorganosiloxane in which the kinematic viscosity at 25 C. is 250 mm.sup.2/S, and the amino equivalent is 7600 g/mol (trade name KF-860 produced by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.)

(8) A-5: Epoxy-modified polyorganosiloxane in which the kinematic viscosity at 25 C. is 17000 mm.sup.2/S and epoxy equivalent: 3800 g/mol (trade name SF-8413 produced by Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd.)

(9) Test Section 2 (Synthesis of Cationic Surfactants)

(10) Synthesis of B-1

(11) A flask was charged with 282 g (1 mol) of octadecenoic acid and 104 g (1 mol) of N-2-hydroxyethylamino ethylamine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 350 g of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-heptadecenyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 175 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-heptadecenyl 2-imidazoline was warmed to 70 to 90 C. Quaternization reaction was performed by gradually dropping 77 g (0.5 mol) of diethyl sulfate thereinto with stirring at the same temperature. After the dropping, aging was performed for 2 hours at the same temperature to then obtain 252 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-ethyl-2-heptadecenyl-2-imidazolinium ethosulfate. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-1.

(12) Synthesis of B-2

(13) A flask was charged with 144 g (1 mol) of octanoic acid and 102 g (1 mol) of N-propylamino ethylamine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 210 g of 1-propyl-2-heptyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 105 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-propyl-2-heptyl-2-imidazoline was melted by warming it to 70 to 90 C. Quaternization reaction was then performed by gradually dropping 63 g (0.5 mol) of dimethyl sulfate thereinto with stirring at the same temperature. After the dropping, aging was performed for 2 hours at the same temperature to then obtain 168 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was 1-propyl-1-methyl-2-heptyl-2-imidazolinium methosulfate. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-2.

(14) Synthesis of B-3

(15) A flask was charged with 200 g (1 mol) of dodecanoic acid and 118 g (1 mol) of N-3-hydroxypropylamino ethylamine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 282 g of 1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-2-undecyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 141 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-2-undecyl-2-imidazoline was melted by warming it to 70 to 90 C. Quaternization reaction was then performed by gradually dropping 77 g (0.5 mol) of diethyl sulfate thereinto with stirring at the same temperature. After the dropping, aging was performed for 2 hours at the same temperature to then obtain 218 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was 1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1-ethyl 2-undecyl-2-imidazolinium ethosulfate. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-3.

(16) Synthesis of B-4

(17) A flask was charged with 284 g (1 mol) of octadecanoic acid and 104 g (1 mol) of N-2-hydroxyethylamino ethylamine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 352 g of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-heptadecyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 176 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-heptadecyl-2-imidazoline was warmed to 70 to 90 C. Quaternization reaction was performed by gradually dropping 77 g (0.5 mol) of diethyl sulfate thereinto with stirring at the same temperature. After the dropping, aging was performed for 2 hours at the same temperature to then obtain 253 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-ethyl-2-heptadecyl-2-imidazolinium ethosulfate. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-4.

(18) Synthesis of B-5

(19) A flask was charged with 200 g (1 mol) of dodecanoic acid and 104 g (1 mol) of N-2-hydroxyethylamino ethylamine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 268 g of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-undecyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 134 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-undecyl-2-imidazoline was warmed to 80 C. with stirring in a nitrogen atmosphere. Reaction was performed with the reaction temperature maintained at 80 to 85 C. by dropping 70 g (0.5 mol) of trimethyl phosphate thereinto over 10 minutes. Aging was performed at the same temperature for 3 hours to obtain 204 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was a quaternized product of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-undecyl-2-imidazoline. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-5.

(20) Synthesis of B-6

(21) A flask was charged with 296 g (1 mol) of nonadecenoic acid and 102 g (1 mol) of N-propylamino ethyl amine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 362 g of 1-propyl-2-octadecenyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 181 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-propyl-2-octadecenyl-2-imidazoline was warmed to 80 C. with stirring in a nitrogen atmosphere. Reaction was performed with the reaction temperature maintained at 80 to 85 C. by dropping 91 g (0.5 mol) of triethyl phosphate thereinto over 10 minutes. Aging was performed at the same temperature for 3 hours to obtain 272 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was a quaternized product of 1-propyl 2-octadecenyl-2-imidazoline. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-6.

(22) Synthesis of B-7

(23) A flask was charged with 158 g (1 mol) of nonanoic acid and 104 g (1 mol) of N-2-hydroxyethylamino ethylamine. Reaction was performed for 8 hours with the mixture maintained at 180 C. while produced water was distilled off by a nitrogen air flow to obtain 226 g of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-octyl-2-imidazoline. Then, 113 g (0.5 mol) of the obtained 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-octyl-2-imidazoline was warmed to 80 C. with stirring in a nitrogen atmosphere. Reaction was performed with the reaction temperature maintained at 80 to 85 C. by dropping 91 g (0.5 mol) of triethyl phosphate thereinto over 10 minutes. Aging was performed at the same temperature for 3 hours to obtain 204 g of a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was a quaternized product of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-octyl 2-imidazoline. This was used as a cationic surfactant B-7.

(24) The contents of the cationic surfactants synthesized above were summarized and shown in Table 1.

(25) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Chemical Formula 1 Chemical Formula 2 Type R.sup.1 R.sup.2 R.sup.3 Y.sup. R.sup.4 R.sup.5 B-1 Heptadecenyl 2-Hydroxyethyl Ethyl group Ethylsulfate group group group B-2 Heptyl group Propyl group Methyl group Methylsulfate group B-3 Undecyl group 3-Hydroxypropyl Ethyl group Ethylsulfate group group B-4 Heptadecyl 2-Hydroxyethyl Ethyl group Ethylsulfate group group group B-5 Undecyl group 2-Hydroxyethyl Methyl group Organic group represented Methyl group Methyl group group by Chemical Formula 2 B-6 Octadecenyl Propyl group Ethyl group Organic group represented Ethyl group Ethyl group group by Chemical Formula 2 B-7 Octyl group 2-Hydroxyethyl Ethyl group Organic group represented Ethyl group Ethyl group group by Chemical Formula 2

(26) The following were provided as rB-1 to rB-3.

(27) rB-1: Water-soluble amide compound obtained by cationizing, with diethyl sulfate, an amide compound obtained by reacting diethylene triamine and docosanoic acid

(28) rB-2: Dialkylethylmethylammonium ethosulfate (trade name Arquad 2HT-50ES produced by Lion Akzo Co., Ltd.)

(29) rB-3: Dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (trade name QUARTAMIN 24P produced by Kao Corporation)

(30) Test Section 3 (Synthesis of Nonionic Surfactants)

(31) Synthesis of C-1: An autoclave was charged with 186 g (1.0 mol) of dodecan-1-ol and 1 g of potassium hydroxide, and gas therein was purged with nitrogen gas. The mixture was warmed to 120 C., and 308 g (7 mol) of ethylene oxide was forced thereinto and reacted therewith. After 1-hour aging reaction, the catalyst was removed by adsorbent treatment to obtain a reaction product. When the obtained reaction product was analyzed, it was a compound comprising one dodecan-1-ol group and a total of seven oxyethylene units in one molecule. This was used as a nonionic surfactant C-1.

(32) The following nonionic surfactants were synthesized in the same manner as the nonionic surfactant C-1 or provided.

(33) C-2: Polyoxyethylene (n=5) octyl ether

(34) C-3: Polyoxyethylene (n=40) docosanyl ether

(35) C-4: Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether (trade name SOFTANOL 50 produced by NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO., LTD.)

(36) C-5: Polyoxyethylene (n=40) octadecyl ether

(37) C-6: Polyoxyethylene (n=10) nonylphenyl ether

(38) rC-1: Octadecene -octadecylthiopropionate

(39) rC-2: Dioctyloctadecene amine oxide

(40) rC-3: Polyethylene glycol (n=8) hexadecanoate

(41) rC-4: Polyoxyethylene (n=30) hydrogenated castor oil ether

(42) rC-5: Triisodecyl trimellitate

(43) Test Section 4 (Provision of Organic Polybasic Acid Salts)

(44) The following organic polybasic acid salts were provided.

(45) D-1: Diethanolamine phthalate

(46) D-2: Dipotassium dodecenylsuccinate

(47) D-3: Calcium dodecenylsuccinate

(48) rD-1: Potassium octadecanoate

(49) Test Section 5 (Provision of Other Compounds)

(50) The following other compounds were provided.

(51) rX-1: Ammonium acetate

(52) rX-2: Ammonium hydroxide salt

(53) Test Section 6 (Preparation of Oil Agents for Carbon Fiber Precursor)

Example 1

(54) First, 140 g of the base component A-1, 30 g of the cationic surfactant B-1, 20 g of the nonionic surfactant C-1, and 10 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-1, which were synthesized or provided in Test Sections 1 to 5 were added in a beaker and well mixed. An aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 1 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 2

(55) Similarly to Example 1, 110 g of the base component A-2, 20 g of the cationic surfactant B-2, 50 g of the nonionic surfactant C-2, and 20 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 2 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 3

(56) Similarly to Example 1, 170 g of the base component A-3, 8 g of the cationic surfactant B-2, 20 g of the nonionic surfactant C-3, and 2 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-1 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 3 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 4

(57) Similarly to Example 1, 190 g of the base component A-4, 6 g of the cationic surfactant B-3, 6 g of the nonionic surfactant C-4, and 1 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 4 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 5

(58) Similarly to Example 1, 120 g of the base component A-2, 14 g of the cationic surfactant B-4, 60 g of the nonionic surfactant C-5, and 6 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 5 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 6

(59) Similarly to Example 1, 150 g of the base component A-1, 40 g of the cationic surfactant B-3, 26 g of the nonionic surfactant C-6, and 4 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 6 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 7

(60) Similarly to Example 1, 160 g of the base component A-3, 20 g of the cationic surfactant B-1, 10 g of the nonionic surfactant C-4, and 10 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 7 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 8

(61) Similarly to Example 1, 60 g of the base component A-3, 10 g of the cationic surfactant B-2, 120 g of the nonionic surfactant C-3, and 10 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-3 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 8 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 9

(62) Similarly to Example 1, 50 g of the base component A-1, 40 g of the cationic surfactant B-1, 90 g of the nonionic surfactant C-2, and 20 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-3 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 9 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 10

(63) Similarly to Example 1, 176 g of the base component A-2, 8 g of the cationic surfactant B-3, 6 g of the nonionic surfactant C-1, and 10 g of the C-4 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 10 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 11

(64) Similarly to Example 1, 130 g of the base component A-2, 20 g of the cationic surfactant B-2, and 50 g of the nonionic surfactant C-3 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 11 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 12

(65) Similarly to Example 1, 40 g of the base component A-1, 20 g of the cationic surfactant B-4, and 140 g of the nonionic surfactant C-5 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 12 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 13

(66) Similarly to Example 1, 104 g of the base component A-5, 16 g of the cationic surfactant B-5, and 80 g of the nonionic surfactant C-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 13 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 14

(67) Similarly to Example 1, 170 g of the base component A-5, 4 g of the cationic surfactant B-6, and 26 g of the nonionic surfactant C-3 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 14 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Example 15

(68) Similarly to Example 1, 130 g of the base component A-5, 10 g of the cationic surfactant B-7, and 60 g of the nonionic surfactant C-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Example 15 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 1

(69) Similarly to Example 1, 176 g of the base component A-1 and 24 g of the nonionic surfactant C-4 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 1 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 2

(70) Similarly to Example 1, 30 g of the nonionic surfactant C-6, 120 g of the rC-1, 20 g of the rC-2, 20 g of the rC-3, and 10 g of the rC-4 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 2 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 3

(71) Similarly to Example 1, 120 g of the base component A-2, 46 g of the A-5, 30 g of the nonionic surfactant C-4, and 4 g of the rX-1 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 3 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 4

(72) Similarly to Example 1, 199.4 g of the base component A-2 and 0.6 g of the rX-2 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 4 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 5

(73) Similarly to Example 1, 160 g of the nonionic surfactant C-1 and 40 g of the organic polybasic acid salt D-1 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 5 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 6

(74) Similarly to Example 1, 30 g of the cationic surfactant rB-1, 80 g of the nonionic surfactant C-1, and 90 g of the rC-5 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 6 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 7

(75) Similarly to Example 1, 140 g of the base component A-2, 40 g of the nonionic surfactant C-4, and 20 g of the organic polybasic acid salt rD-1 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 7 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 8

(76) Similarly to Example 1, 172 g of the base component A-4, 4 g of the cationic surfactant rB-2, and 24 g of the nonionic surfactant C-1 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 8 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

Comparative Example 9

(77) Similarly to Example 1, 172 g of the base component A-4, 4 g of the cationic surfactant rB-3 and 24 g of the nonionic surfactant C-1 were added in a beaker and well mixed, and an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of Comparative Example 9 was prepared by adding ion-exchanged water to the mixture gradually with stirring continuously such that the solid content concentration was 50%.

(78) The contents of the oil agents for a carbon fiber precursor of the examples prepared above were summarized and shown in Table 2.

(79) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Base Cationic Nonionic Polybasic component surfactant surfactant acid salt Other Section Type Ratio (%) Type Ratio (%) Type Ratio (%) Type Ratio (%) Type Ratio (%) Ex. 1 A-1 70 B-1 15 C-1 10 D-1 5 2 A-2 55 B-2 10 C-2 25 D-2 10 3 A-3 85 B-2 4 C-3 10 D-1 1 4 A-4 95 B-3 1.5 C-4 3 D-2 0.5 5 A-2 60 B-4 7 C-5 30 D-2 3 6 A-1 75 B-3 20 C-6 13 D-2 2 7 A-3 80 B-1 10 C-4 5 D-2 5 8 A-3 30 B-2 5 C-3 60 D-3 5 9 A-1 25 B-1 20 C-2 45 D-3 10 10 A-2 88 B-3 4 C-1 3 C-4 5 11 A-2 65 B-2 10 C-3 25 12 A-1 20 B-4 10 C-5 70 13 A-5 52 B-5 8 C-2 40 14 A-5 85 B-6 2 C-3 13 15 A-5 65 B-7 5 C-2 30 Com. Ex. 1 A-1 88 C-4 12 2 C-6 15 rC-1 60 rC-2 10 rC-3 10 rC-4 5 3 A-5 23 C-4 15 rX-1 2 A-2 60 4 A-2 99.7 rX-2 0.3 5 C-1 80 D-1 20 6 rB-1 15 C-1 40 rC-5 45 7 A-2 70 C-4 20 rD-1 10 8 A-4 86 rB-2 2 C-1 12 9 A-4 86 rB-3 2 C-1 12

(80) Test Section 7

(81) Adhesion of Oil Agent for a Carbon Fiber Precursor

(82) An aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of each example prepared in Test Section 6 was adhered to acrylic filament yarn (75 denier/40 filament) by roller oiling method such that the oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor was 0.50.1%, and the yarn was then dried at 115 C. for 4 seconds using a drying roller to obtain sample yarn A. This sample yarn A was used for the evaluation of electric resistance value and generated electricity mentioned below. An aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent of each example prepared in Test Section 6 was adhered to acrylic filament yarn (16000 denier/12000 filament) by immersion such that the oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor was 0.50.1%, and the yarn was then dried at 115 C. for 4 seconds using a drying roller to obtain sample yarn B. This sample yarn B was used for the evaluation of convergence properties mentioned below.

(83) Test Section 8 (evaluation)

(84) Evaluation of Electric Resistance Value

(85) The sample yarn A was left to stand in an atmosphere of 2065% RH for 24 hours, and a box for measuring electric resistance (40-ml capacity) was charged with 10 g of evaluation sample under the same conditions. The electric resistance (log ) was measured using the trade name Insulation Meter SM-5E manufactured by TOA Electronics Ltd., and the electric resistance value was evaluated according to the following criteria.

(86) Evaluation criteria of electric resistance value (log ):

(87) : less than 9

(88) : 9 to less than 10

(89) x: 10 to less than 11

(90) xx: 11 or more

(91) Evaluation of Generated Electricity

(92) The sample yarn A was left to stand in an atmosphere of 2065% RH for 24 hours and made to travel in contact with a chrome-plated pin subjected to satin finish under the same conditions at an initial tension of 20 g and a yarn speed of 100 m/minute, and the generated electricity after the contact was measured with a current-collecting potential meter (manufactured by KASUGA DENKI, INC.) and evaluated according to the following criteria.

(93) Evaluation Criteria of Generated Electricity

(94) 5: Less than 50 volts

(95) 4: 50 volts or more to less than 100 volts

(96) 3: 100 volts or more to less than 300 volts

(97) 2: 300 volts or more to less than 500 volts

(98) 1: 500 volts or more

(99) Evaluation of Convergence Properties

(100) When 50 kg of the sample yarn B was manufactured, the convergence condition of the carbon fiber precursor fiber at the time of passing in each process and being wound was visually observed. The same test was performed 5 times, and the convergence properties were evaluated according to the following criteria.

(101) Evaluation Criteria of Convergence Properties

(102) : The convergence properties are very good, and there is no problem with process passability at all.

(103) : The convergence properties are good, and there is no problem with process passability.

(104) x: The convergence properties are short, and there is a slight problem with process passability.

(105) xx: The convergence properties are inferior, and there is a great problem with process passability.

(106) Evaluation of Rust

(107) Ion-exchanged water was further added to an aqueous 50% liquid of the oil agent for a carbon fiber precursor of each example prepared in Test Section 6 such that the solid content concentration was 2%. A washed metal guide roller was immersed in this aqueous solution, and it was then left to stand at 20 C.100% RH for 24 hours. The rusting condition of each metal guide roller was visually observed, and the rust was evaluated according to the following criteria.

(108) Evaluation Criteria of Rust

(109) : The rusting is not observed.

(110) x: The rusting is observed.

(111) The results of the oil agents for a carbon fiber precursor of the examples evaluated above were summarized and shown in Table 3.

(112) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Evaluation results Electric Generated Convergence Section resistance value electricity properties Rust Ex. 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 4 9 4 10 4 11 4 12 4 13 3 14 3 15 3 Com. Ex. 1 xx 1 2 xx 1 xx 3 x 1 4 xx 1 5 2 xx 6 x 1 xx 7 xx 1 8 x 2 9 3 x

(113) As is clear from the results of Table 3 corresponding to Table 2, according to the present invention, excellent antistatic properties and convergence properties can be imparted to a carbon fiber precursor, process passability of the carbon fiber precursor during production can be consequently improved, and the production of rust in a machine for producing a carbon fiber precursor can be suppressed.