MICROBIAL FUEL CELL, METHOD OF CONTROLLING AND MEASURING THE REDOX POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE OF THE FUEL CELL

Abstract

A microbial fuel cell (MFC) in which the anode and/or cathode half-cell comprises at least one additional electrode insulated from direct contact with the working electrode and arranged to be coupled to an external voltage or current source, wherein the additional electrode does not comprise an internal redox system, methods of operation of MFCs and methods for measuring, controlling or modulating MFC circuits are described.

Claims

1. A microbial fuel cell (MFC) in which the anode and/or cathode half-cell comprises at least one additional electrode insulated from direct contact with the working electrode and arranged to be coupled to an external voltage or current source, wherein the additional electrode does not comprise an internal redox system.

2. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the insulation of the additional electrode is provided by an open-ended impermeable coat or a fully closed semi-permeable coat.

3. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 2, wherein the open-ended impermeable coat or the fully closed semi-permeable coat comprises one or more ceramic, polymeric plastic, silicone or rubber or wherein the fully closed semi-permeable coat comprises one or more semi-permeable fabric, intestinal skin, collagen, or biodegradable organic matter.

4. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the surface area of the additional electrode is the same as or smaller than the surface area of the working electrode.

5. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the additional electrode comprises or is formed from the same material as the working electrode

6. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the additional electrode comprises or is formed from different material from the working electrode.

7. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the external voltage or current source is provided by one or more of an additional microbial fuel cell or any other external circuit supplying low power including, a domestic mains supply, wind power, photovoltaics, hydropower, a battery, an accumulator or a chemical fuel cell

8. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the anode and/or cathode half-cell comprises two or more additional electrodes.

9. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the ratio of the macro-surface area of the additional electrode to the volume of the half-cell containing the electrode is from about 1:1 to about 1:50.

10. The microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of the microbial fuel cells are connected by time-division multiplexing

11. A method of controlling the redox potential of a microbial fuel cell according to claim 1, the method comprising adding at least one additional electrode to an anode and/or cathode half-cell, the additional electrode being insulated from direct contact with the working electrode and connected to an external voltage or current source.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the additional electrode poises the anode toward a more negative redox potential and/or poises the cathode toward a more positive redox potential.

13. The method according to claim 11, wherein the external voltage or current source is provided by one or more of an additional microbial fuel cell or any other external circuit supplying low power including, a domestic mains supply, wind power, photovoltaics, hydropower, a battery, an accumulator or a chemical fuel cell

14. The method according to claim 11, wherein at least two microbial fuel cells are connected by time-division multiplexing.

15. A method of measuring a microbial fuel cell circuit including a fuel cell according to claim 1, the method comprising adding at least a first additional electrode to the anode half-cell and a second additional electrode to the cathode half-cell, the additional electrodes being insulated from direct contact with the working electrodes and not comprising an internal redox system, and measuring the redox potential difference across the first and second additional electrodes.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the voltage or current of the microbial fuel cell circuit is measured across the first and second additional electrodes.

17. A method for exerting rapid modulatory control of networks, groups or stacks of MFC by secondary circuits, the method comprising providing secondary circuits by an external voltage or current source, and using amplification or attenuation to increase or decrease the power output from the MFCs.

18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the secondary circuits are provided by MFCs

19. The method according to claim 17, wherein the modulatory control is amplification,

20. The method according to claim 17, wherein the modulatory control is attenuation.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0023] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings FIGS. 1 to 3, of which:

[0024] FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of electrochemical reactions within the anode and cathode of a mediator-based MFC. The + and − signs indicate the direction of electrons.

[0025] FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a standard MFC with two compartments (half-cells) and 4 electrodes.

[0026] FIG. 3 shows data produced from experiments where a 3rd electrode (anode half-cell) is used. FIG. 3a shows an increase of ˜80% as a result of poising through a carbon 3rd pin (same material as anode). FIG. 3b shows a 10-fold increase in the current output of an identical MFC, poised by a smaller (driver) MFC through an aluminium 3rd electrode (dissimilar to the anode) and the effect of disconnecting the driver MFC.

DESCRIPTION

[0027] As shown in FIG. 1, within the mediator-based MFC, (natural or synthetic) three distinct redox potential differences exist for the system to work. The first of these is between the oxidised form of the mediator and the biological electron carrier within the bacterium cell (δV.sub.1). Once the mediator intercepts the electron transport chain and becomes reduced (gains electrons) there is a potential difference between the reduced form of the mediator and the anode electrode (δV.sub.2). Due to the dissimilarity between the two electrolytes (anolyte and catholyte) there is a third redox potential difference between the anode and cathode terminals (δV.sub.3).

[0028] These redox potentials can be optimised by poising toward a more +ve or more −ve redox value using the MFCs of the present invention. For example, poising the anode half-cell toward a more negative value, resulting in a greater difference between the anode half-cell and the cathode, results in a greater number of electrons flowing through the circuit and hence a greater power output.

[0029] FIG. 2 shows a MFC according to one embodiment of the invention with two compartments (half-cells) and four electrodes. The MFC comprises an anode half-cell 1, containing anode liquid electrolyte (anolyte) 7 and a cathode half-cell 2, containing cathode liquid electrolyte (catholyte) 8. Electrodes 3 and 4 are the standard anode and cathode working electrodes, connected to un-insulated or insulated wire 11. Electrode 5 is the 3.sup.rd electrode and electrode 6 is the 4.sup.th electrode, each being connected to insulated electrical wire 12. The anode working electrode is by default negatively charged and the cathode working electrode is by default positively charged.

[0030] Anode half-cell 1: The addition of a smaller similar or dissimilar metal or conductive non-metal electrode 5 into this compartment allows the electrochemical poising—and hence the control—of the anolyte 7 to a more negative redox value or to any value for a desired electrochemical reaction. This can be done by any conventional voltage or current source, however, this can also be realised by using another MFC. This connection might involve the inclusion of resistors or diodes. The smaller or equal surface area 3rd and/or 4th electrode is insulated by an open-ended impermeable coat or indeed a fully closed semi-permeable coat 9. This is to stop the 3rd and/or 4th electrodes from having direct contact with the working electrodes—especially important for a small scale MFC—but to allow the electrochemical poise to still take place.

[0031] Cathode half-cell 2: The addition of a smaller similar or dissimilar metal or non-metal electrode 6 into this compartment allows the electrochemical poising—and hence the control—of the catholyte 8 to a more positive redox value or to any value for a desired electrochemical reaction.

[0032] The 3rd and 4th electrodes provide junctions for electrochemical control of a MFC, and also provide novel connection points for modulatory control of multiple MFC units as stacks.

[0033] FIG. 3 shows data produced from experiments where only a 3rd electrode (in the anode half-cell) is used. FIGS. 3a and 3b show a remarkable increase in the power output of two different individual MFCs, after being poised by a separate smaller (driver) MFC, via the additional electrode (3rd electrode) in the anode. FIG. 3a shows an increase of ˜80% as a result of such poising through a carbon 3rd pin (same material as anode). FIG. 3b shows a 10-fold increase in the current output of an identical MFC, poised by a smaller (driver) MFC through an aluminium 3rd electrode (dissimilar to the anode) and the effect of disconnecting the driver MFC. These novel findings have opened up a whole new field of MFC modulation and control towards favourable redox conditions for maximum performance.

[0034] Also noted were the effects of switching on and off the third or fourth pin electrodes in terms of speed and decay of the MFC response, noting that the response is in terms of seconds rather than hours (important feature of modulation). This is due the electrodes acting electrochemically to boost the redox potential across the half-cells, rather than acting on the microbial population, which can take minutes or hours to react to a change in stimulus.

REFERENCES

[0035] Menicucci J1, Beyenal H, Marsili E, Veluchamy R A, Demir G, Lewandowski Z. Procedure for determining maximum sustainable power generated by microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Feb. 1; 40(3):1062-8.