Vent Attachment System For Micro-Electromechanical Systems
20180009655 · 2018-01-11
Inventors
Cpc classification
B81B2201/0257
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B27/322
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B81C1/00833
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B81C99/002
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B7/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B81B7/0029
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B81B7/0061
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B81B7/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B27/28
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B81C1/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B7/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method of installing a vent to protect an open port of a micro-electrical mechanical system (MEMS) device, the vent being of the type comprising an environmental barrier membrane attached to a carrier and the vent further being attached to a liner, the method comprising the steps of: (a) feeding the vent to a die attach machine with die ejectors and at least one of a vacuum head and a gripper head; (b) detaching the vent from said liner using the die ejectors; (c) picking up the vent with at least one of the vacuum head and the gripper head of the die attach machine; (d) disposing the vent over the open port of the MEMS device; and (e) securing the vent over the open port of the MEMS device.
Claims
1. A method of installing a vent assembly to protect an open port of a micro-electrical mechanical system (MEMS) device, said vent assembly being of the type comprising an environmental barrier membrane attached to a carrier and said vent further being attached to a liner, said method comprising the steps of: (a) feeding said vent assembly to a die attach machine with die ejectors and at least one of a vacuum head and a gripper head; (b) detaching said vent assembly from said liner using said die ejectors; (c) picking up said vent assembly with at least one of said vacuum head and said gripper head of said die attach machine; (d) disposing said vent assembly over said open port of said MEMS device; and (e) securing said vent assembly over said open port of said MEMS device.
2. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said carrier comprises a material selected from the group consisting of PEEK and polyimide.
3. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said carrier is attached to said membrane by a pressure sensitive adhesive.
4. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said carrier is attached to said membrane by a weld.
5. A method as defined in claim 4 wherein said weld is selected from a group comprising a heat weld, a sonic weld, and a laser weld.
6. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said liner comprises a material having a stiffness lower than a stiffness of said carrier.
7. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said liner comprises a dicing tape.
8. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said vent assembly is attached to said liner by a pressure sensitive adhesive.
9. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said membrane comprises ePTFE.
10-15. (canceled)
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0013] This disclosure provides for the protection of an open port of a MEMS device by enabling a vent, which is an environmental barrier such as an ePTFE membrane, to act as a barrier to dust and liquid while allowing transmission of the intended signal: typically a temperature, pressure, or acoustic signal. The disclosure specifically relates to the attachment method, and more specifically to constructions that allow the vent to be attached with equipment that is readily available, and already used, by MEMS packaging companies.
[0014] Currently, adhesive vents are most commonly mounted on substrates either by hand or with something like a label applicator, which removes parts from an advancing roll and uses a vacuum head to place the parts on a substrate. The substrate is typically put in place by hand, or is introduced through an assembly line. Manual application and label applicators do not offer the accuracy or the throughput required for MEMS packaging applications.
[0015] Exemplary embodiments of vent assemblies according to this disclosure will now be described in connection with the Figures. One exemplary embodiment is vent assembly 10, shown in
[0016] Alternatively, materials other than ePTFE are used, provided they have higher melt temperatures than carrier 12 and can withstand the processing temperatures. An exemplary alternative material is polyparaxylylene (PPX) and its derivatives.
[0017] With reference to
[0018] An alternative embodiment, which eliminates the need to use epoxy dispensing, is illustrated in
[0019] The disclosed vent assembly is installed either on the internal or external surface of the package, or both, and it is used in either a top or bottom port package (or both) as well.
[0020] The following examples are intended to illustrate certain embodiments of the disclosure, but are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims.
EXAMPLES
[0021] The following Test Method is described in connection with the examples: Axial Stiffness.
[0022] Axial Stiffness (k) in units of kg-f/cm was calculated according to the following equation:
A is the cross-sectional area (width times thickness) of the sample in cm.sup.2
E is the elastic modulus in kg-f/cm.sup.2
L is the length of the sample in cm
[0023] The elastic modulus of the sample (25.4 mm in width, 50.8 mm in length) was measured using ASTM D882-12.
Example 1 Single Sided Adhesive Construction|PEEK Carrier & UV Curable Liner
[0024] A vent composite was constructed as follows: One of the two release liners from a sheet of a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive material (0.025 mm in thickness) which has two release liners on either side of the adhesive layer, was removed. The sheet of silicone adhesive was then laminated by means of pressure to a carrier layer of a film of PEEK (0.05 mm in thickness available as Product No. LS425444 from GoodFellow, USA). The PEEK side was further laminated by means of pressure to a layer of low tack adhesive with a 0.09 mm PET substrate.
[0025] Arrays of holes (diameter of 0.35 mm with center to center distance of 1.35 mm) were laser cut on the resultant laminate. Some fiducial holes were also laser cut around the perimeter of the laminate. The low tack adhesive layer was then removed from the laminate. The laminate was then placed on a layer of UV curable liner (thickness of 0.125 mm, Product No. Adwill D-485H from Lintec of America, Inc). The other release liner of the silicone pressure sensitive adhesive material sheet was then removed. An ePTFE membrane (mass/area of 1 g/m.sup.2) was then laminated to the pressure sensitive adhesive material by means of pressure to create a vent composite.
[0026] A vision system was used to identify the fiducial holes cut around the perimeter of the laminate. The vent composite was positioned such that nine arrays (1 inch by 1 inch), each comprising 400 vents (squares of length 1.3 mm each) were cut down through all the layers of the composite except the UV curable liner layer. The vent composite was then cured using the Dymax UV flood curing system for 6 seconds.
[0027] The cured vent composite was then mounted on to the ePAK hoop ring (Part No. eHR-170/186-6-OUT-X-Y) and the ring was positioned in the pick and place equipment (PP-One Manual Placer, JFP Microtechnic). Using a microscope, each vent in the array was centered over the center guide hole (2 mm in diameter) of the pepper pot having 4 needles which were spaced at a distance of 0.85 mm from each other.
[0028] The pick up tool comprised a rubber tip with four holes, 50 micron in diameter and spaced 0.76 mm apart from each other. The pick up tool was moved into place and pressed down on the vent of the array with about 50 g force. Vacuum of 55 kPa was pulled through the holes in the pick up tool as well as through the pepper pot. The pepper pot was then pneumatically pushed down, allowing the die eject needles (Small Precision Tools Inc, Part No. PUN-0.70-18 mm-15DG-25MIC) to extend by about 0.75 mm, thereby puncturing the UV curable liner layer of the vent composite and releasing the vent from the liner. The pick up tool was then moved to a placement stage consisting of a pattern of die attach epoxy. The vent was then disposed and secured over the stage.
[0029] As described in Table I below, the vent created in this example was able to be successfully picked from the liner and placed on to the placement stage. The stiffness of the liner and the carrier were measured to be 3.7 kgf/cm and 60 kgf/cm respectively.
Example 2 Double Sided Adhesive Construction|PEEK Carrier & LDPE Liner
[0030] A vent composite was constructed as follows: One of the two release liners from a first sheet of a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive material (0.025 mm in thickness) which has two release liners on either side of the adhesive layer, was removed. The first sheet of silicone adhesive was then laminated by means of pressure to a carrier layer of a film of PEEK (0.05 mm in thickness available as Product No. LS425444 from GoodFellow, USA).
[0031] The PEEK side was further laminated to a second sheet of a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive material (0.025 mm in thickness) having two release liners and from which one of the release liners was removed.
[0032] Arrays of holes (diameter of 0.35 mm with center to center distance of 1.35 mm) were laser cut on the resultant laminate. Some fiducial holes were also laser cut around the perimeter of the laminate. The second release layer of the second silicone adhesive sheet was then removed from the laminate.
[0033] The laminate was then placed on a layer of LDPE release liner (thickness 0.05 mm with CIS Easy Release 65 coating from Rayven Inc.). The other release liner of the first sheet of silicone pressure sensitive adhesive material was then removed. An ePTFE membrane (mass/area of 1 g/m.sup.2) was then laminated to the pressure sensitive adhesive material by means of pressure to create a vent composite.
[0034] A vision system was used to identify the fiducial holes cut around the perimeter of the laminate. The vent composite was positioned such that nine arrays (1 inch by 1 inch), each comprising 400 vents (squares of length 1.3 mm each) were cut down through all the layers of the composite except the LDPE liner layer.
[0035] The resultant vent composite was then mounted on to the ePAK hoop ring (Part No. eHR-170/186-6-OUT-X-Y) and the ring was positioned in the pick and place equipment (PP-One Manual Placer, JFP Microtechnic). Using a microscope, each vent in the array was centered over the center guide hole (2 mm in diameter) of the pepper pot having 4 needles which were spaced at a distance of 0.85 mm from each other.
[0036] The pick up tool comprised a rubber tip with four holes, 50 micron in diameter and spaced 0.76 mm apart from each other. The pick up tool was moved into place and pressed down on the vent of the array with about 50 g force. Vacuum of 55 kPa was pulled through the holes in the pick up tool as well as through the pepper pot. The pepper pot was then pneumatically pushed down, allowing the die eject needles (Small Precision Tools Inc, Part No. PUN-0.70-18 mm-15DG-25MIC) to extend by about 0.75 mm, thereby puncturing the UV curable liner layer of the vent composite and releasing the vent from the liner. The pick up tool was then moved to a placement stage. The vent was then disposed and secured over the stage.
[0037] As described in Table I below, the vent created in this example was able to be successfully picked from the liner and placed on to the placement stage. The stiffness of the liner and the carrier were measured to be 4.1 kgf/cm and 60 kgf/cm respectively.
Comparative Example
Double Sided Adhesive∥PEEK Carrier & PET Liner
[0038] A vent composite and a vent was created according to the materials and methods described in Example 2 with the exception that a 0.05 mm PET release liner was used instead of the LDPE release liner.
[0039] As reported in Table I below, the vent created in this example was not able to be successfully picked from the liner. The stiffness of the liner and the carrier were measured to be 65 kgf/cm and 60 kgf/cm respectively.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Axial Stiffness Axial Stiffness Example Liner (kgf/cm) Carrier (kgf/cm) Result Example 1 3.7 60 Able to be pick and placed Example 2 4.1 60 Able to be pick and placed Comparative 65 60 Not able to be picked Example