ADJUVANT COMPOSITION CONTAINING AT LEAST ONE INFLUENZA VIRUS NEUTRALIZING AND BINDING MOLECULE AND VACCINE COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME

Abstract

This invention relates to an adjuvant composition containing at least one binding molecule for neutralizing influenza virus and a vaccine composition containing the same. The composition containing at least one binding molecule for neutralizing influenza virus is capable of increasing the effects of a vaccine, and can thus be used as an adjuvant, which increases an immune response upon vaccine administration, and is very useful in the prevention of diseases caused by viruses.

Claims

1. An adjuvant composition, comprising at least one binding molecule for neutralizing an influenza virus.

2. The adjuvant composition of claim 1, wherein the binding molecule binds to an epitope in a stem region of a hemagglutinin (HA) protein of an influenza A virus.

3. The adjuvant composition of claim 1, wherein an epitope of the binding molecule is at least one selected from the group consisting of i) an epitope comprising any one amino acid residue selected from the group consisting of amino acids at positions 18, 25, 27, 32, 33, 38, 40, 54, 55, 278, 291, 292, 310, 311, 312 and 318 of an HA1 polypeptide; and ii) an epitope comprising any one amino acid residue selected from the group consisting of amino acids at positions 18, 19, 20, 21, 38, 39, 41, 42, 45, 46, 48, 49, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58, 60 and 99 of an HA2 polypeptide.

4. The adjuvant composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one binding molecule is at least one selected from the group consisting of i) a binding molecule, comprising a light-chain variable domain including a CDR1 region of SEQ ID NO:1, a CDR2 region of SEQ ID NO:2 and a CDR3 region of SEQ ID NO:3, and a heavy-chain variable domain including a CDR1 region of SEQ ID NO:4, a CDR2 region of SEQ ID NO:5 and a CDR3 region of SEQ ID NO:6, as determined according to the Kabat method; and ii) a binding molecule, comprising a light-chain variable domain including a CDR1 region of SEQ ID NO:7, a CDR2 region of SEQ ID NO:8 and a CDR3 region of SEQ ID NO:9, and a heavy-chain variable domain including a CDR1 region of SEQ ID NO:10, a CDR2 region of SEQ ID NO:11 and a CDR3 region of SEQ ID NO:12, as determined according to the Kabat method.

5. The adjuvant composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one binding molecule is at least one selected from the group consisting of i) a binding molecule including a light chain having a polypeptide sequence of SEQ ID NO:13 and a heavy chain having a polypeptide sequence of SEQ ID NO:14; and ii) a binding molecule including a light chain having a polypeptide sequence of SEQ ID NO:15 and a heavy chain having a polypeptide sequence of SEQ ID NO:16.

6. A vaccine composition, comprising the adjuvant composition of claim 1 and a target antigen.

7. The vaccine composition of claim 6, wherein the target antigen is an influenza virus antigen.

8. The vaccine composition of claim 6, wherein a weight ratio of the antigen and the adjuvant composition ranges from 1:0.02 to 1:200.

9. A method of preparing a vaccine composition comprising the adjuvant composition of claim 1 and a target antigen.

10. A method of enhancing an immune response to a target antigen, administering the vaccine composition of claim 6 to a host.

11. A method of preparing an immunological product, comprising: a) immunizing a host by administering the vaccine composition of claim 6 to the host; and b) obtaining an immunological product from the immunized host, wherein the immunological product is a T cell, a B cell or an antibody against a target antigen comprised in the vaccine composition.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0062] FIG. 1 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H1N1 influenza virus in a serum that is sampled 13 days, 17 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 1);

[0063] FIG. 2 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H1N1 HA protein and H1N1 influenza virus in a serum that is sampled 28 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 3);

[0064] FIG. 3 shows changes in the survival rate and body weight of the immunized mouse after inoculating the immunized mouse with 10MLD.sub.50 of H1N1 influenza virus;

[0065] FIG. 4 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H1N1 influenza virus in a serum that is sampled 13 days, 20 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 5);

[0066] FIG. 5 shows changes in the survival rate and body weight of the immunized mouse after inoculating the immunized mouse with 10MLD.sub.50 of H1N1 influenza virus;

[0067] FIG. 6 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H1N1 influenza virus in a serum that is sampled 13 days, 20 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 7);

[0068] FIG. 7 shows changes in the survival rate and body weight of the immunized mouse after inoculating the immunized mouse with 10MLD.sub.50 of H1N1 influenza virus;

[0069] FIG. 8 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H3N2 influenza virus in a serum that is sampled 13 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H3N2 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 9);

[0070] FIG. 9 shows changes in the survival rate and body weight of the immunized mouse after inoculating the immunized mouse with 10MLD.sub.50 of H3N2 influenza virus;

[0071] FIG. 10 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H1N1 influenza virus in a serum is sampled 13 days, 20 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 11);

[0072] FIG. 11 shows the results of measurement the proportion of the B cell population among immune cells in the spleen 1 day, 3 days and 7 days after the second intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 14);

[0073] FIG. 12 shows the results of measurement the proportion of the B cell population among immune cells in the inguinal lymph node 1 day, 3 days and 7 days after the second intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 14);

[0074] FIG. 13 shows the results of measurement the proportion of the B cell population in the spleen and lymph nodes 1 day and 3 days after inoculation with H1N1 virus 4 weeks after the second intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 15); and

[0075] FIG. 14 shows the ELISA results of a specific antibody titer against H1N1 influenza virus in a serum that is sampled 13 days, 20 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection under the condition that each mouse is intramuscularly injected twice with an H1N1 vaccine composition at an interval of two weeks (Table 16).

MODE FOR INVENTION

[0076] Hereinafter, the present invention will be explained in more detail with reference to the following examples. However, the following examples and test examples are provided only to illustrate the present invention but are not to be construed as the limit of present invention. The documents cited in the present invention are incorporated by reference into description of the present invention.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Evaluation of Vaccine Adjuvant Effect of Influenza Virus-Neutralizing Antibody

1-1. ELISA

[0077] In order to evaluate the effect of therapeutic CT120 and CT149 antibodies as an influenza virus vaccine adjuvant, as set forth in Table 1 below, animal testing was performed. As shown in Table 1 below, 0.2 μg of H1N1 split vaccine was administered alone, or in combination with an adjuvant Alum (1 mg) typically used as an adjuvant or a CT120 antibody (0.5 μg, 1 μg, 5 μg, 10 μg) or a CT149 antibody (0.5 μg, 1 μg, 5 μg, 10 μg) as an adjuvant, after which the antibody titer against influenza virus in each mouse was measured.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Mouse Group Antigen Adjuvant Route # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 4 Group 2 PBS CT 120 10 μg i.m. 4 Group 3 PBS CT 149 10 μg i.m. 4 Group 4 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg — i.m. 4 Group 5 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT 120 10 μg i.m. 4 Group 6 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT 120 5 μg i.m. 4 Group 7 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT120 1 μg i.m. 4 Group 8 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT120 0.5 μg i.m. 4 Group 9 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT149 10 μg i.m. 4 Group 10 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT149 5 μg i.m. 4 Group 11 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT149 1 μg i.m. 4 Group 12 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg CT149 0.5 μg i.m. 4 Group 13 H1N1 split vaccine 0.2 μg Alum i.m. 4

[0078] As set forth in Table 1, the H1N1 vaccine composition was intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of two weeks, after which the immune response induced in each test group was observed. 13 days, 17 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection, the serum was sampled from each test group and the antibody titer thereof was measured through ELISA.

[0079] As seen in the results of FIG. 1, the antibody able to detect a virus corresponding to the vaccine administered as a whole was produced in a larger amount in the groups administered with the vaccine in combination with CT120, CT149 or Alum than in the group administered only with the vaccine. When comparing the amounts of the antibodies 27 days after administration of the vaccine and the adjuvant, the amounts of the produced antibodies were similar in the group administered with 5 μg of CT120 or 10 μg of CT149 and the group administered with Alum, and the group administered with 1 μg or 0.5 μg of CT149 produced the antibody in a large amount compared to the group administered with Alum.

1-2. Hemagglutinin Inhibition Assay (HI Assay)

[0080] As shown in Table 2 below, in order to verify whether the therapeutic antibodies CT120 and CT149 are effective as an influenza virus vaccine adjuvant, the effectiveness of the vaccine was evaluated through hemagglutinin inhibition assay (HI assay). 13 days, 17 days and 27 days after administration of the vaccine and the adjuvant, the serum was obtained from each mouse, and the antibody titer able to inhibit the hemagglutination of influenza virus and chicken erythrocyte was measured.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 HI titer Day Day Day Group Antigen Adjuvant 13 17 27 Group 1 PBS — N.D. N.D. N.D. Group 2 PBS CT 120 10 μg N.D. N.D. N.D. Group 3 PBS CT 149 10 μg N.D. N.D. N.D. Group 4 H1N1 split vaccine — N.D. N.D. 40 0.2 μg Group 5 H1N1 split vaccine CT 120 10 μg N.D. N.D. 40 0.2 μg Group 6 H1N1 split vaccine CT 120 5 μg N.D. N.D. 80 0.2 μg Group 7 H1N1 split vaccine CT120 1 μg N.D. N.D. 40 0.2 μg Group 8 H1N1 split vaccine CT120 0.5 μg N.D. N.D. 40 0.2 μg Group 9 H1N1 split vaccine CT149 10 μg N.D. N.D. 80 0.2 μg Group 10 H1N1 split vaccine CT149 5 μg N.D. N.D. 40 0.2 μg Group 11 H1N1 split vaccine CT149 1 μg N.D. 40 160  0.2 μg Group 12 H1N1 split vaccine CT149 0.5 μg N.D. N.D. 160  0.2 μg Group 13 H1N1 split vaccine Alum N.D. 20 80 0.2 μg

[0081] As in the results of FIG. 1, when comparing the amounts of the antibodies 27 days after administration of the vaccine and the adjuvant, the groups administered with 5 μg of CT120 and 10 μg of CT149 (Groups 6 and 9) exhibited an HI titer similar to that of the group administered with Alum (Group 13), and the groups administered with 1 μg and 0.5 μg of CT149 (Groups 11 and 12) exhibited high HI titer compared to the group administered with Alum.

[0082] When CT120 or CT149 was administered together upon injection of the influenza virus vaccine, an immunogenicity-enhancing effect similar or superior to that of the Alum adjuvant was manifested. Thereby, CT120 and CT149 can be found to be effective as the influenza virus vaccine adjuvant.

Example 2: Determination of Antigen Concentration to Verify the Adjuvant Effect of CT120 and CT149 Using H1N1 Vaccine as Antigen

2-1. Antibody Production Result

[0083] As shown in Table 3 below, animal testing was performed to determine the appropriate antigen concentration before the verification of the adjuvant effect of the therapeutic antibody. H1N1 vaccine (cell-based) in an amount ranging from 0.01 μg to 1 μg was administered alone or in combination with an Alum adjuvant, after which the antibody titers were measured through ELISA, and the neutralizing antibody titers were measured through HI. “Standard” indicates a commercially available trivalent vaccine, and was used for comparison of test results.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 5 Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 1 μg — i.m. 5 Group 3 H1N1 vaccine 1 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 4 Standard 3 μg — i.m. 5 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.5 μg — i.m. 5 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.5 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.2 μg — i.m. 5 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.2 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.1 μg — i.m. 5 Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.1 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 11 Standard 0.3 μg — i.m. 5 Group 12 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 5 Group 13 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 14 H1N1 vaccine 0.01 μg — i.m. 5 Group 15 H1N1 vaccine 0.01 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 16 Standard 0.03 μg — i.m. 5

[0084] As set forth in Table 3, the H1N1 vaccine composition was intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of two weeks, after which the immune response induced in each test group was observed. 28 days after the first intramuscular injection, the serum was sampled from each test group and the antibody titer against HA protein and virus in the serum was measured through ELISA and the neutralizing antibody titer was measured through HI assay.

[0085] As seen in the results of FIG. 2, the antibody titer was increased in approximate proportion to the amount of the antigen that was added, and the antibody titer was higher when the Alum adjuvant was added therewith. Furthermore, there was no great difference between the antibody titer against HA protein and the antibody titer against H1N1 virus.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Group HI titer Group 1 PBS N.D. Group 2 H1N1 1 μg 160 Group 3 H1N1 1 μg + alum 1280 Group 4 Standard 3 μg 80 Group 5 H1N1 0.5 μg 160 Group 6 H1N1 0.5 μg + alum 320 Group 7 H1N1 0.2 μg 80 Group 8 H1N1 0.2 μg + alum 160 Group 9 H1N1 0.1 μg 20 Group 10 H1N1 0.1 μg + alum 160 Group 11 Standard 0.3 μg N.D. Group 12 H1N1 0.05 μg 20 Group 13 H1N1 0.05 μg + alum 80 Group 14 H1N1 0.01 μg N.D. Group 15 H1N1 0.01 μg + alum N.D. Group 16 Standard 0.03 μg N.D.

[0086] As is apparent from the results of Table 4, the HI titer was increased in the test groups administered with the antigen and Alum compared to the test groups administered only with the antigen. Furthermore, in the test groups having an antigen concentration of 0.1 μg (Groups 9 and 10) and the test groups having an antigen concentration of 0.05 μg (Groups 12 and 13), the HI titer was increased 8 times and 4 times respectively when the Alum adjuvant was further added compared to when only the antigen was added, whereby a difference in the vaccine effects with or without the adjuvant was clearly confirmed.

2-2. Protective Immunity Result

[0087] In order to evaluate the protective immunity against influenza virus, 4 weeks after the second immunization, 10MLD.sub.50 of CA/04/09 H1N1 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity and allowed to infect it, after which changes in the survival rate and body weight of each mouse were measured for 15 days.

[0088] As shown in the results of FIG. 3, the protective immunity effect against influenza virus was high at all concentrations in the test groups administered with the antigen and the adjuvant compared to the test group administered only with the antigen. Furthermore, as for the test groups of two antigen concentrations (0.1 μg and 0.05 μg) at which the vaccine effect was significantly different in the presence or absence of the adjuvant through HI titer measurement, in the 0.1 μg test groups, the test group administered only with the antigen exhibited a survival rate of 80% and the test group administered with the antigen and the adjuvant showed a survival rate of 100%. On the other hand, in the 0.05 μg test groups, the test group administered only with the antigen exhibited a survival rate of 60% and the test group administered with the antigen and the adjuvant showed a survival rate of 100%.

2-3. Conclusion

[0089] Based on the HI titer results and the protective immunity effects against influenza virus, as for the 0.1 μg test groups, the HI titer results were different but a difference in the protective immunity effects depending on whether or not the adjuvant was present was low, and thus, 0.05 μg, at which differences in the HI titer results and the protective immunity effects were significant depending on whether or not the adjuvant was present, was determined as the ultimate antigen concentration. Subsequently, animal testing was performed to evaluate the adjuvant effect using the same.

Example 3: Evaluation of Adjuvant Effect of CT120 and CT149 Using H1N1 Vaccine as Antigen

3-1. Evaluation of Adjuvant Effect of CT120 Using H1N1 Vaccine as Antigen

[0090] 3-1-1. Antibody Production Result

[0091] Using an antigen concentration of 0.05 μg, determined based on the animal test results (Example 2), animal testing for verifying the adjuvant effects of therapeutic antibodies CT120 and CT149 was carried out. Here, in mouse testing, the adjuvant effects of CT120 (mIgG2a) and CT149 (mIgG2a), corresponding to the mouse forms of CT120 and CT149 antibodies, are expected to be effective compared to CT120 or CT149, and thus all of CT120 and CT149 and mouse forms thereof were used for animal testing.

[0092] The mouse-form antibody was manufactured by replacing the constant region of the Fc region in CT120 or CT149, which is the human IgG1 form, with the IgG1 or IgG2a region of the mouse.

[0093] The amounts of CT120 and CT120 (mIgG2a) were determined by selecting the concentrations effective as the adjuvant through the preliminary test (not described herein).

[0094] The H1N1 vaccine (cell-based) was mixed with the therapeutic antibody at various concentrations, reacted at 37° C. for 1 hr, and intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of 2 weeks, as shown in Table 5 below. 13 days, 20 days, and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection, the serum was sampled in each test group and the antibody titer against H1N1 virus in the serum and the neutralizing antibody titer were measured through ELISA and HI assay, respectively.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 10 Group 2 PBS CT 120 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 3 PBS CT 120 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg Group 4 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 10 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 0.05 μg i.m. 10 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 0.1 μg i.m. 10 Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.05 μg Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg Group 11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 10 Group 12 Standard 0.15 μg — i.m. 10

[0095] As seen in the results of FIG. 4, the antibody titer against H1N1 virus was higher in the test group using the mouse-form CT120 (mIgG2a) as the adjuvant than in the test group using CT120 as the adjuvant. Furthermore, in the case of the test group using CT120 (mIgG2a), the antibody titer was high compared to the test group using Alum as the adjuvant, and the antibody titer was drastically increased in the serum (D20 of FIG. 5) sampled 3 weeks after the first immunization.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Ag Adjuvant HI titer G1 PBS — N.D. G2 PBS CT 120 0.5 μg N.D. G3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg N.D. G4 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — 20 G5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 0.05 μg 40 G6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 0.1 μg 20 G7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 0.5 μg 20 G8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.05 μg 40 G9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg 80 G10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg 160  G11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum 80 G12 Standard 0.15 μg — N.D.

[0096] As is apparent from the results of Table 6, the HI titer was generally increased a maximum of 4 times depending on the concentration in the test group using CT120 (mIgG2a) as the adjuvant compared to the test group using CT120 as the adjuvant. The test group (Group 10) using 0.5 μs of CT120 (mIgG2a), having the highest antibody titer, exhibited the highest HI titer, specifically 160, among all test groups.

[0097] 3-1-2. Protective Immunity Result

[0098] In order to evaluate the protective immunity against influenza virus, 4 weeks after the second immunization, 10MLD.sub.50 of CA/04/09 H1N1 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity and allowed to infect it, after which changes in the survival rate and body weight of each mouse were measured for 15 days.

[0099] As seen in the results of FIG. 5, when CT120 (mIgG2a) was used as the adjuvant, the survival rate was higher than in the test group using CT120 as the adjuvant or the test group using only the antigen, and the changes in body weight were the lowest. In particular, the test group using, as the adjuvant, 0.5 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a), having the highest antibody titer and HI titer results, exhibited a survival rate of 100%, which is 30% higher than that of the test group using Alum as the adjuvant.

[0100] Thereby, CT120 (mIgG2a) can be found to be more effective as the adjuvant compared to CT120 and to manifest the greatest effect when administered at a concentration of 0.5 μg.

3-2. Evaluation of Adjuvant Effect of CT149 Using H1N1 Vaccine as Antigen

[0101] 3-2-1. Antibody Production Result

[0102] As shown in Table 7 below, the concentration at which the adjuvant effect was exhibited in the preliminary test (not described herein) for CT149 was determined, and the same testing as in Example 3-1-1 was carried out.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 10 Group 2 PBS CT 149 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 3 PBS CT 149 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg Group 4 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 10 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 0.01 μg i.m. 10 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 0.05 μg i.m. 10 Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.01 μg Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.05 μg Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg Group 11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 10 Group 12 Standard 0.15 μg — i.m. 10

[0103] As seen in the results of FIG. 6, the adjuvant effect of CT149 was generally weak, unlike CT120, and the antibody titer similar to the test group using the Alum adjuvant was represented in the test group using 0.5 μg of CT149 (mIgG2a).

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Ag Adjuvant HI titer G1 PBS — N.D. G2 PBS CT 149 0.5 μg N.D. G3 PBS CT 149 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg N.D. G4 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — 20 G5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 0.01 μg 20 G6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 0.05 μg 40 G7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 0.5 μg 20 G8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 (mIgG2a) 0.01 μg 20 G9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 (mIgG2a) 0.05 μg 40 G10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 149 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg 80 G11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum 80 G12 Standard 0.15 μg — N.D.

[0104] As is apparent from the results of Table 8, the HI titer was not significantly increased in the test group using CT149 or CT149 (mIgG2a) as the adjuvant, and as in the results of antibody titer measured through ELISA, the HI titer in the test group using 0.5 μg of CT149 (mIgG2a) (Group 10) was the same as that in the test group using the Alum adjuvant (Group 11).

[0105] 3-2-2. Protective Immunity Result

[0106] In order to evaluate the protective immunity against influenza virus, 4 weeks after the second immunization, 10MLD.sub.50 of CA/04/09 H1N1 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity and allowed to infect it, after which changes in the survival rate and body weight of each mouse were measured for 15 days.

[0107] As seen in the results of FIG. 7, the test group using 0.5 μg of CT149 (mIgG2a) as the adjuvant exhibited a survival rate of 80%, which is 10% higher than when using Alum. The extent of changing the body weight was not significantly improved compared to when using Alum.

3-3. Conclusion

[0108] Based on the above results, CT120 (mIgG2a) exhibited an outstanding adjuvant effect for the H1N1 vaccine, especially the greatest effect when used at a concentration of 0.5 μg. When CT149 (mIgG2a) was used at 0.5 μg, the adjuvant effect was exhibited, but was lower than that of CT120 (mIgG2a).

Example 4: Evaluation of Adjuvant Effect of CT120 and CT149 Using H3N2 Vaccine as Antigen

[0109] The effects of CT120 and CT149 as the adjuvant for H1N1 vaccine were confirmed through Examples 1 to 3, and, using another influenza virus strain, Philippines/2/82 (H3N2), H3N2 vaccine (cell-based) was produced, and animal testing was performed to evaluate the effects of CT120 and CT149 as the adjuvant for H3N2 vaccine.

4-1. Antibody Production Result

[0110] As shown in Table 9 below, animal testing was performed to determine the appropriate antigen concentration before verification of the adjuvant effect of the therapeutic antibody. H3N2 vaccine in an amount ranging from 0.01 μs to 1 μg was administered alone or in combination with the Alum adjuvant, after which the antibody titers were measured through ELISA and the neutralizing antibody titers were measured through HI. Furthermore, in order to evaluate the protective immunity effect, each mouse was infected with mouse-adapted Philippines/2/82 (H3N2) virus and changes in the survival rate and body weight thereof were measured.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 5 Group 2 H3N2 vaccine 1 μg — i.m. 5 Group 3 H3N2 vaccine 1 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 4 H3N2 vaccine 0.5 μg — i.m. 5 Group 5 H3N2 vaccine 0.5 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 6 H3N2 vaccine 0.2 μg — i.m. 5 Group 7 H3N2 vaccine 0.2 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 8 H3N2 vaccine 0.1 μg — i.m. 5 Group 9 H3N2 vaccine 0.1 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 10 H3N2 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 5 Group 11 H3N2 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 5 Group 12 H3N2 vaccine 0.01 μg — i.m. 5 Group 13 H3N2 vaccine 0.01 μg Alum i.m. 5

[0111] As set forth in Table 9, the H3N2 vaccine composition was intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of two weeks, after which the immune response induced in each test group was observed. 2 weeks after each intramuscular injection, the serum was sampled from each test group and the antibody titer against H3N2 virus in the serum was measured through ELISA and the neutralizing antibody titer was measured through HI assay.

[0112] As seen in the results of FIG. 8, the antibody titer was increased in proportion to the amount of the antigen that was added, and the antibody titer was higher when used together with the Alum adjuvant.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Group Ag Adjuvant HI titer Group 1 PBS — N.D. Group 2 H3N2 vaccine 1 μg — 160 Group 3 H3N2 vaccine 1 μg Alum 320 Group 4 H3N2 vaccine 0.5 μg — 160 Group 5 H3N2 vaccine 0.5 μg Alum 320 Group 6 H3N2 vaccine 0.2 μg —  80 Group 7 H3N2 vaccine 0.2 μg Alum 640 Group 8 H3N2 vaccine 0.1 μg —  80 Group 9 H3N2 vaccine 0.1 μg Alum 320 Group 10 H3N2 vaccine 0.05 μg — N.D. Group 11 H3N2 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum 640 Group 12 H3N2 vaccine 0.01 μg — N.D. Group 13 H3N2 vaccine 0.01 μg Alum 160

[0113] As is apparent from the results of Table 10, the HI titer was higher in the test group using the antigen and Alum than in the test group using only the antigen. In the test groups using 0.01 μg and 0.05 μg of the antigen (Groups 12 and 10), the HI titer could not be measured, but the HI titers were increased to 160 and 640 in the test groups further added with the Alum as adjuvant (Groups 13 and 11), respectively.

4-2. Protective Immunity Result

[0114] In order to evaluate the protective immunity against influenza virus, 4 weeks after the second immunization, 10MLD.sub.50 of A/Philippines/2/82 H3N2 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity and allowed to infect it, after which changes in the survival rate and body weight of each mouse were measured for 15 days.

[0115] As shown in the results of FIG. 9, the immune response effects were high in the test groups other than the test groups administered only with low-dose antigens, namely 0.01 μg of the antigen and 0.05 μg of the antigen.

4-3. Conclusion

[0116] The H3N2 vaccine composition exhibited variable HI titer and survival rate depending on the presence or absence of the adjuvant at the antigen concentration (0.05 μg) used in the H1N1 test of Example 3. Thus, animal testing for evaluating adjuvant effects of the therapeutic antibodies CT120 and CT149 using the determined H3N2 antigen concentration of 0.05 μg was performed in the same manner as in Example 3, whereby the effects of CT120 and CT149 as the adjuvant for H3N2 vaccine serving as the antigen were confirmed.

Example 5: Mechanism of Adjuvant Function for Influenza Vaccine

[0117] Based on the test results of Examples 1 to 4, the therapeutic influenza antibody was concluded to function as an adjuvant for enhancing the effect of the influenza vaccine. Thus, animal testing for the mechanism for generating the adjuvant effect was performed.

[0118] The hypothesis about the mechanism for exhibiting the effect of the therapeutic antibody as the adjuvant for influenza vaccine is that the Fc region of the antibody may bind to the Fc receptor present in immune cells, whereby the immune response to influenza vaccine may occur more efficiently.

[0119] In order to prove this hypothesis, the antibody concentrations of CT120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg and 0.5 μg, which manifested the apparent adjuvant effect in Example 3, were chosen, and intact CT120 (mIgG2a) and Fe-free CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2 in various amounts as shown in Table 11 below were reacted with 0.05 μg of H1N1 vaccine and were then intramuscularly injected to mice, after which the induced immune response was observed.

5-1. Antibody Production Result

[0120] As shown in Table 11 below, the CT120 (mIgG2a)-administered group was tested at concentrations of 0.1 μg and 0.5 μg, at which the greatest effects as the H1N1 vaccine adjuvant were shown in Example 3. As for the CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2-administered group, testing was performed in the group in which the same amount was administered as to CT120 (mIgG2a) and in the group in which the amount of CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2 was calculated and administered so as to be identical to the molar ratio with the vaccine at 0.5 μs and 0.1 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a).

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 10 Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 10 Group 3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 4 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 10 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg i.m. 10 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.5 μg i.m. 10 Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.3 μg i.m. 10 Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.1 μg i.m. 10 Group 11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.06 μg i.m. 10

[0121] H1N1 vaccine was mixed with various concentrations of CT120 (mIgG2a) or CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2, reacted at 37° C. for 1 hr, and intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of 2 weeks as shown in Table 11, after which the immune response induced in each test group was observed. 13 days, 20 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection, the serum was sampled in each test group and the antibody titer against H1N1 virus in the serum and the neutralizing antibody titer against H1N1 virus were measured through ELISA and HI, respectively.

[0122] As shown in the results of FIG. 10, the antibody titer was relatively low when using CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2, and the antibody titer difference was not significantly different in any of the test groups.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Group Ag Adjuvant Route HI titer Group 1 PBS — i.m. N.D. Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 20 Group 3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.5 μg i.m. N.D. Group 4 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg i.m. N.D. Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 160  Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg i.m. 160  Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg i.m. 80 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.5 μg i.m. 40 Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.3 μg i.m. 20 Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.1 μg i.m. 20 Group 11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.06 μg i.m. 40

[0123] As is apparent from the results of Table 12, the HI titer in all of the test groups using CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2 as the adjuvant (Groups 8 to 11) was similar to that of the test group (Group 2) in which the H1N1 vaccine was administered alone without the adjuvant. In contrast, the test groups (Groups 6 and 7) using intact CT120 (mIgG2a) as the adjuvant exhibited HI titers of 160 and 80, respectively, which are increased 8 times and 4 times compared to the test group in which the H1N1 vaccine was administered alone (Group 2).

5-2. Protective Immunity Result

[0124] In order to evaluate the protective immunity against influenza virus, 4 weeks after the second immunization, 10MLD.sub.50 of CA/04/09 H1N1 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity and allowed to infect it, after which the survival rate of each mouse was measured for 15 days.

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Survival rate Group Ag Adjuvant (%) Group 1 PBS — 0% Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — 20% Group 3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.5 μg 0% Group 4 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg 0% Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum 80% Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg 100% Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg 90% Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.5 μg 50% Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.3 μg 30% Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.1 μg 30% Group 11 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) F(ab')2 0.06 μg 30%

[0125] As is apparent from the results of Table 13, the test groups using intact CT120 (mIgG2a) as the adjuvant (Groups 6 and 7) exhibited a high survival rate, as in Example 3, but the test groups using CT120 (mIgG2a) F(ab′)2 as the adjuvant (Groups 8 to 11) manifested a survival rate similar to that of the test group using only the antigen (Group 2).

5-3. Conclusion

[0126] Based on the above results, the Fc region of the antibody was found to play an important role as the influenza vaccine adjuvant.

Example 6: Target Immune Cells Discovery of Influenza Vaccine Adjuvant

6-1. Verification of Target Immune Cells

[0127] The Fc region of the influenza antibody was confirmed to play an important function as the adjuvant in Example 5. Accordingly, animal testing was performed to discover cells having an immune response varying depending on the binding to the Fc region, among immune cells that express the Fc receptor. Used as the amount of the antibody was mouse-form CT120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg, which exhibited the greatest effect as the H1N1 vaccine adjuvant in Example 3.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse# Group 1 PBS — i.m 3 Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m 3 Group 3 — CT 120 (mIgG2a) i.m 3 0.5 μg Group 4 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m 3 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) i.m 3 0.5 μg Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) i.m 3 F(ab')2 0.5 μg

[0128] The H1N1 vaccine and the adjuvant were mixed, reacted at 37° C. for 1 hr, and intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of 2 weeks, as set forth in Table 14. 1 day, 3 days and 7 days thereafter, the spleen and the inguinal lymph node in each mouse were separated and thus the number of various immune cells and the corresponding cell proportion were measured.

[0129] As shown in the results of FIGS. 11 and 12, when H1N1 vaccine and CT120 (mIgG2a) were added, the amount of B cells was approximately doubled in both the spleen and the inguinal lymph node 1 day after the two intramuscular injections, compared to the other administered groups. On the 3.sup.rd day and the 7.sup.th day, relatively similar cell proportion resulted.

[0130] Thus, the CT120 adjuvant was confirmed to increase the immune response of B cells through the Fc region. In the CT120 F(ab′)2-administered group, there was no difference with the mouse to which the PBS control was administered, and thus the importance of the Fc region was confirmed once more. Accordingly, the CT120 adjuvant can be found to increase the immunogenicity of the H1N1 vaccine through a mechanism different from that of the commercially available adjuvant Alum.

6-2. Protective Immunity Result of B Cells

[0131] The CT120 adjuvant was confirmed to enhance B cell immunity in Example 6-1. Based thereon, animal testing for evaluating whether the CT120 adjuvant is able to be associated with the protective immunity of B cells even in a state of viral inoculation was performed.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse# Group 1 PBS — i.m 3 Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m 3 Group 3 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) i.m 3 0.5 μg Group 4 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m 3

[0132] As set forth in Table 15, the H1N1 vaccine composition was intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of 2 weeks. After 4 weeks, 10MLD.sub.50 of CA/04/09 H1N1 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity. 1 day and 3 days after viral infection, the spleen and the internal lymph node in each mouse were separated and the B cell proportion in all the cells was measured using a flow cytometer.

[0133] As seen in the results of FIG. 13, when the spleen was analyzed 1 day after viral infection, the B cell population was increased by about 10% in the test group using both the H1N1 vaccine and CT120 compared to the PBS control. In the test group using both the vaccine and Alum, the B cell population was significantly increased compared to the PBS control, but was not greatly increased compared to the test group using CT120. Furthermore, immature B cells, namely B-1 cells (CD19+B220−) were present in the other groups, but only B-2 cells (CD19+B220+) developed from the B-1 cells were present in the test group using the H1N1 vaccine and CT120. In the case of lymph nodes, as in the spleen, the B cell proportion was not drastically increased, but was significantly increased in three repeated experiments.

6-3. Conclusion

[0134] Thereby, when CT120 was used as the adjuvant, more mature B cells were rapidly formed.

Example 7: Comparison of Effects of Commercially Available Adjuvant and CT120

[0135] Through the above Example, CT120 was confirmed to be effective as the influenza vaccine adjuvant, and this effect was compared with the effect of a currently useful influenza vaccine adjuvant. The currently commercially available seasonal influenza vaccine adjuvant is MF59, Fluad of Novartis. In the following comparison test, AddaVax™ (InvivoGen, Catalog # vac-adx-10) having the same composition as MF59 was used.

7-1. Antibody Production Result

[0136] Testing was performed using 0.5 μg and 0.1 μg of mouse-form CT120 (mIgG2a), showing the greatest effect as the H1N1 vaccine adjuvant in Example 3. In Table 16 below, 100% AddaVax indicates the amount of the adjuvant contained in 45 μg of seasonal influenza vaccine HA.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Group Ag Adjuvant Route Mouse # Group 1 PBS — i.m. 10 Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — i.m. 10 Group 3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) i.m. 10 Fab 0.5 μg Group 4 PBS AddaVax 100% i.m. 10 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum i.m. 10 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 i.m. 10 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 100% i.m. 10 Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 10% i.m. 10 Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 1% i.m. 10

[0137] H1N1 vaccine was mixed with CT120 (mIgG2a) or AddaVax having the same composition as the commercially available adjuvant, reacted at 37° C. for 1 hr, and intramuscularly injected twice to mice at an interval of 2 weeks, as set forth in Table 16, and the immune response induced in each test group was then observed. 13 days, 20 days and 27 days after the first intramuscular injection, the serum was sampled in each test group and the antibody titer against H1N1 virus in the serum and the neutralizing antibody titer against H1N1 virus were measured through ELISA and HI, respectively.

[0138] As seen in the results of FIG. 14, only the test group administered with 100% AddaVax exhibited the antibody titer similar to that of the test groups administered with 0.5 μg and 0.1 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a). When 10% and 1% AddaVax were administered, low antibody titers resulted.

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 HI Group Ag Adjuvant titer Group 1 PBS — N.D. Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — 20 Group 3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) Fab 0.5 μg N.D. Group 4 PBS AddaVax 100% N.D. Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum 160 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg 160 Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg 80 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 100% 160 Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 10% 20 Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 1% N.D.

[0139] As is apparent from the results of Table 17, the 100% AddaVax-administered test group (Group 8) exhibited the HI titer similar to the test groups administered with 0.5 μg and 0.1 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a) (Groups 6 and 7), but the test groups administered with 1% and 10% AddaVax (Groups 10 and 9) manifested the HI titer similar to the test group administered only with H1N1 vaccine (Group 2) or the HI titer thereof was not measured.

7-2. Protective Immunity Result

[0140] In order to evaluate the protective immunity against influenza virus, 4 weeks after the second immunization, 10MLD.sub.50 of CA/04/09 H1N1 virus was inoculated to the immunized mouse nasal cavity and allowed to infect it, after which the mouse survival rate was measured for 15 days.

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Survival Group Ag Adjuvant rate (%) Group 1 PBS — 0 Group 2 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg — 20 Group 3 PBS CT 120 (mIgG2a) Fab 0 0.5 μg Group 4 PBS AddaVax 100% 0 Group 5 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg Alum 80 Group 6 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.5 μg 100 Group 7 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg CT 120 (mIgG2a) 0.1 μg 90 Group 8 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 100% 90 Group 9 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 10% 60 Group 10 H1N1 vaccine 0.05 μg AddaVax 1% 0

[0141] As is apparent from the results of Table 18, the test group administered with 100% AddaVax (Group 8) exhibited a survival rate similar to that of the test groups administered with 0.5 μg and 0.1 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a) (Groups 6 and 7), and the survival rate was decreased in the test groups administered with 1% and 10% AddaVax (Groups 10 and 9).

7-3. Conclusion

[0142] Therefore, the adjuvant effect when H1N1 vaccine was added with 0.5 μg and 0.1 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a) was similar to the effect when the adjuvant was added in an amount (100% AddaVax) in 45 μg of the commercially available influenza vaccine HA. In Example 4, when 0.5 μg of CT149 (mIgG2a) was used as the adjuvant, similar results were obtained compared to when 0.1 μg and 0.5 μg of CT120 (mIgG2a) were administered, from which CT149 (mIgG2a) can be expected to exhibit effects similar to those of CT120 (mIgG2a).