INSECT TRAP

Abstract

The invention relates to an insect trap (10) and more particularly to an insect trap which has been designed to facilitate the destruction of micro-organisms thereby countering odours and mitigating against the spread of germs. The trap (10) comprises a. a housing (12); b. a cover (14); c. one or a plurality of insect attracting lights (16); and d. an insect catching means (18) and further comprises a UVC lamp which emits radiation (or other means) which is capable of destroying air-borne pathogens. The insect attractant lamps (16) heat the air which is convected as a consequence of louvered openings (26) in the cover and an opening (30) in the top (28) of the trap and circulate across the UVC lamp where the micro-organisms are killed.

Claims

1. A trap for catching insects comprising a. a housing; b. a cover; c. one or a plurality of insect attracting lights; and d. an insect catching means characterised in that said trap further comprises a means capable of destroying air-borne pathogens which is positioned towards the top of the trap and wherein at least one insect attracting light is disposed at the bottom of the trap such that an air flow is generated from the bottom towards the means capable of destroying air-borne pathogens where the air is treated or sterilized to destroy airborne pathogens picked up in the convecting air stream.

2.-15. (canceled)

Description

[0030] The various aspects of the invention will be described further, by way of example, with reference to the following figures in which:

[0031] FIG. 1 is perspective view of an insect trap according to the invention with the cover removed and the UVC shield displaced;

[0032] FIG. 2 is perspective view of an insect trap according to the invention with the cover shown displaced from the housing and the UVC lamp and cover removed;

[0033] FIG. 3 is perspective view of the insect trap with the housing hinged open to show the insect catching means;

[0034] FIG. 4 is a graph showing the levels of A. niger present in the atmosphere over time with an insect trap with and without a UV lamp fitted; and

[0035] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the levels of B. circulans present in the atmosphere over time with an insect trap with and without a UV lamp fitted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] Referring to the Figs an insect trap (10) according to the invention comprises five basic components: [0037] a housing (12); [0038] a cover (14) [0039] one or a plurality of insect attracting lights (16a,b,c) [0040] an insect catching means (18a,b); and [0041] a means (20) for destroying air-borne pathogens.

[0042] In the exemplifying embodiment the frame (12) comprises a perimeter frame (12) which is hinged to a back frame (12). Such a frame allows the insect attracting lights to be carried in a manner allowing ease of access as disclosed in PCT/GB2009/001097. The perimeter frame (12) is best illustrated in FIG. 3 and comprises upper (12a) and lower (12b) frame members and two side members (12c; 12d). The perimeter frame (12) is swing, swivel or hinge mounted to the back frame (12) via a swing mechanism (22).

[0043] A plurality of 15 W or 25 W UV lights (16), three are illustrated in the example, are connected to paired electrical fittings and wiring which runs in channels or conduits which are sealed by rubber or silicon gaskets and enclosed by fascia plates such that they provide rigidity to the moulded plastics frame in a manner disclosed in PCT/GB2009/001097.

[0044] Behind each light (16a, b, c) there is provided a reflector (24a, b, c) which is held in place by stops which enable the reflectors to be sprung mounted thereby facilitating ease of removal for cleaning. An insect capturing means (18a, b), in the form of a back glue board (18a) and a base glue board (18b) can be easily fitted between the back frame (12) and the perimeter housing (12).

[0045] The cover (14) is made of a translucent material and has an innermost surface which is shaped or roughened to maximise the transmission of UV light as set out in EP1457111. The openings (26) which allow insects in maybe simple apertures as illustrated or louvered or angled to prevent the lights (16) being visible when viewed substantially perpendicularly to the normal plane of the back housing (12a). The general principle of maintaining a pleasant appearance of trap is set out in EP0947134 but the use of louvers is a further improvement in this regard. In particular, the louver openings (26) are paired about a centre axis (x-x) to provide a downward and upward inflexion respectively of between 30 and 60. The apertures whether planar or louvered help facilitate air flow in the trap and air moves upwards by convection as it is heated by the lights (16). Thus, an air flow is created from the bottom, over base glue board (18b) and across back glue board (18a) towards the UVC lamp (20) where it is treated or sterilized to destroy airborne pathogens picked up in the convecting air stream. The UVC lamp has associated with it a safety screen (32) which is fitted in front thereof. In FIG. 1 it is shown displaced for clarity.

[0046] At the top (28) of the trap there is a sized opening (30) which allows hot air to escape. This assists in ensuring the air flows across the UVC lamp (20) for a period sufficient to destroy airborne pathogens. The skilled person will appreciate that to increase the contact time between the air and the UVC lamp, the lamp (or lamps) can be orientated in different directions, for example longitudinally (from top to bottom) as opposed to transverse (across), thereby increasing contact time as the air flows across the lamp from the bottom of the trap to the top.

[0047] As described in PCT/GB2009/001097 the trap has many of the features and benefits described therein and which are not therefore disclosed in detail herein. Thus, the trap is suited to jet washing (to IP65 requirements) and shields (34) are fitted around of the light where it connects to electrical fittings. In this manner two single shields (34) can be removed to access a plurality of lights. A similar shield may be used about the UVC lamp.

Examples

[0048] In order to test the efficacy of the trap arrangement, the trap described with reference to FIGS. 1-3 was subjected to a trial as described below, in order to determine if any microorganisms derived from fly corpses were prevented from contaminating the atmosphere of a room by the incorporation of a UV lamp into the trap.

[0049] Two microbial sources were employed. In a first trial, a fungal lawn of Aspergillus niger was grown on agar plates which were placed at the bottom of the trap. It was anticipated that this would provide a consistent and abundant source of airborne spores. A second trial involved the location of 300 dead house flies which had been sprayed with a Bacillus circulans (Bacterial) culture at the bottom of the trap.

[0050] Each trial involved measuring the level of fungal or bacterial contamination in a 25 m.sup.2 vented space over a 48 hour sampling period at 4 hour intervals. A control trap had a white light source, whilst the active trap utilised a UV source.

Results

[0051] The results of the respective experiments are given in Table 1 and Table 2 and these are shown graphically in FIGS. 4 and 5.

CONCLUSIONS

[0052] The results shown in the tables and graphs indicate that UV dosing reduced fungal emissions by 95% (Table 1 and FIG. 4) and bacterial emissions by 65% (Table 2 and FIG. 5).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Atmospheric levels of Aspergillus niger detected during operation of Orbit devices fitted with a UV lamp or White light lamp (Internal device challenge with an Aspergillus niger lawn) Hours Treatment 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 MEAN UV 17 40 90 110 70 60 300 340 200 130 110 200 390 158 Control 9 36 103 940 460 1200 4300 3100 2300 9200 7200 6300 8300 3342 Mean Percent Difference reduction due to UV treatment over 48 hours; All data Colony forming units per Litre of atmosphere

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Atmospheric levels of TOTAL VIABLE COUT detected during operation of Orbit devices fitted with a UV lamp or White light lamp (Internal device 300 House flies spiked with Bacillus circulans) Hours Treatment 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 MEAN UV 90 50 70 30 50 90 110 60 90 80 55 Control 50 20 90 40 180 300 260 310 460 340 200 173 Mean Percent Difference reduction due to UV treatment over 48 hours; All data Colony forming units per Litre of atmosphere